Talk:SCEPCOP
From RationalWiki
Heh. First browse & what do I get? A Scientology (ads by Google) advert. say no more! This message brought to you by:
respondand honey 04:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Argument # 2: “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” Says: "there are nevertheless 7 problems with it to keep in mind". Err... number 2's missing, or at least not numbered. Shum mishtake shurely? This message brought to you by:
respondand honey 05:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hehe, shirley there is a mistake there. ħuman
05:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Forum topic: BLASPHEMY: taking the name of the GOAT in vain. - note, the author compares "believers" to sheep - Freudian slip? This message brought to you by:
respondand honey 05:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- "the believers - the 'sheep' - and the non-believers - the 'goats'" No, just her ESP in full force. Or... ħuman
05:38, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- "the believers - the 'sheep' - and the non-believers - the 'goats'" No, just her ESP in full force. Or... ħuman
- Forum topic: BLASPHEMY: taking the name of the GOAT in vain. - note, the author compares "believers" to sheep - Freudian slip? This message brought to you by:
- Hehe, shirley there is a mistake there. ħuman
Am I the only one who wasted half an hour on that homeopathy site just playing with the mouse following thingy? ĵ₳¥ášÇ♠ʘ swirling politicians! 01:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yup! I am eating
& honeychat 01:06, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- I "ran" it for a minute or so to see what the algorithm was. Interesting that a website would provide an irritating "game" that utterly distracts visitors from the content. I forget what the site was about or if there were any links, I was too busy herding blue dots. ħuman
03:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- I "ran" it for a minute or so to see what the algorithm was. Interesting that a website would provide an irritating "game" that utterly distracts visitors from the content. I forget what the site was about or if there were any links, I was too busy herding blue dots. ħuman
[edit] minor edit war
Fifth H'man, calling "Winston Wu" a schizophrenic twice in the article is really lame. And let's use the name he uses for himself, k? ħuman
05:20, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Hell I am using the fucking kid's gloves so far...the guy abandoned his kids, exploits women in third world countries, and is in general a total womanizing, fraudulent twit. Seriously look at this shit. Fifth Horseman 05:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Pffffft what a lame edit war - even for a minor one. Someone fuck the other guy up. I'll leave you guys to it. I have a slinky pillow-fight to attend to. Ace McWickedModel 500 05:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- I am laughing too hard at the fact that the best the woo community can muster is a schizophrenic pimp hiding in the Philippines because of the cheap prostitutes and the ability to avoid being forced to support his child and wife. I am sure once the smoke clears I can fight a proper battle. Fifth Horseman 05:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Pffffft what a lame edit war - even for a minor one. Someone fuck the other guy up. I'll leave you guys to it. I have a slinky pillow-fight to attend to. Ace McWickedModel 500 05:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)