Talk:Social Darwinism

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:Social Darwinism/Archive 1

[edit] BS

This is utter bullshit and a slander on both Spencer and Sumner, who were merely classical liberals or libertarians, which I would suppose the author to be.— Unsigned, by: somebody / talk / contribs

it's not slander, it's libel (because it's published rather than said). except that it's not even that, as they're both long dead. I think the word you're after is "misrepresentation"; however that seems to be exactly what the later Social Darwinists did. SophieWilderModerator 21:08, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Was good article until the ending bit of bias.

It was a very good article until the author slammed "the religious right" at the end. Whatever label you give yourself, please get over your own stereotypes because now I cannot use your article in my book which is against the social Darwinists (who do still exist and run our government until we get over their divide and conquer strategies against us and unite to remove them from power and from returning to power) and is from a religious perspective. Christ was not a social Darwinist. — Unsigned, by: 67.5.110.116 / talk / contribs 00:47, 31 October 2014

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support