Talk:Toxoplasma gondii
From RationalWiki
I think it would be better to put what is actually known about it first, before the crank versions, because of a few known psychological effects about debunking. It would be also nice to find a better source than the HuffPo - either a link to the original research, or a more reputable source discussing the research.--ZooGuard (talk) 13:16, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Do you think there's room for more general info about toxoplasmosis at the top? Transmission, treatment, groups at risk, etc? Helen 15:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- I think the article should start with just general outline of what it is (something about transmission can go there) and its real/documented effects - first "what it does" before "what it doesn't". :) Further detail should be somewhere in the body of the article. I don't think I have special preferences where.--ZooGuard (talk) 16:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Is this better? Helen 16:59, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- I think the article should start with just general outline of what it is (something about transmission can go there) and its real/documented effects - first "what it does" before "what it doesn't". :) Further detail should be somewhere in the body of the article. I don't think I have special preferences where.--ZooGuard (talk) 16:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)