Talk:USS Liberty incident

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] Let's talk conspiracies

Does anyone have any serious reports on this incident that seriously disproves the NSA reports on this? If not, don't post. If so, your posts'll be taken on a case by case basis. Until someone finds something real, stop fucking with this article. *Asterisk* (talk) 05:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

This is a collaborative wiki. The article doesn't belong to you & you have no editorial authority over it. If you want to write something that other people don't interfere with, do it as an essay rather than an article. WèàšèìòìďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 11:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Not all contributions are created equal. So far, I'm the only guy who's gone into detail on what happened on June 8th, 1967, not to mention sourced it. All you've done is contribute unsourced speculation that my sourced facts completely contradict. *Asterisk* (talk) 18:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Actually, no, you haven't "gone into detail" — instead, you have dropped some context-free text on the page, accompanied by your own disjointed, sloppily proofread commentary. You have also removed the Rusk quote, and the mention of an eyewitness account, the Ennes book. That makes it look like you seem eager to tell one side of the story and suppress the other. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 19:18, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
If just being an eyewitness account meant anything, this would be a reliable 9-11 resource. I posted the history of what happened on that day by linking to accounts that were actually reliable in a summarized form. All you did was add back in the conspiracy support because you can't stand the idea that I'm right and your wrong. Just what the hell have you sourced from this that I haven't disproved? What have you added of any substance that hasn't been contradicted by more reliable accounts? Absolutely nothing, and now you've locked the page in an effort to keep this stupid conspiracy alive. You could've at least attempted to provide something real or critically analyze what's been presented to you, but that'd require actual work.
I hope your happy. You've made this site a dumber place from your contributions here. *Asterisk* (talk) 04:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
"You've made this site a dumber place from your contributions here." Can you maybe stop making comments like this as if you're the boss of the site? You've scarcely been here a week. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 17:56, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support