Talk:Vladimir Putin
Contents |
[edit] this guy is awesome!
i love Russian..... so serious...... with a deadly gaze without emotion.
.......... i wish my GF was a sexy Russian dominatrix but she just a normal girl...... WHY!? ............WHY!?Waronstupidity (talk) 20:16, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- Conservapedia's article on him is one of the few articles by them that's better than Wikipedia's. RationalWiki also has the right idea in shorter sentences, but the main Wikipedia is burdened by being a high value target for Putin's spin doctors. Look at [1] 's uncanny praise of him. I think it might have gotten a lil better lately, but still no mention of the very apparent poll rigging (some formal looking website as well as the Cobarat's Report (Misspelled ...or was it the Daily Show)) claimed there was one region where more ppl voted than the total number of legible voters, with only one voting against Putin.
- Wikipedia does not focus on defending Russia's image in general, [2] actually talks of a history of Psychiatry being used as an excuse for political suppression, and if you read to the end of that article, you'll find Putin's government using the method to defend him. But only 100 people a day read the article talking of political suppression, while 5000 a day read the article on Putin which contains no mention of political suppression other than that unfairness has been suggested. 24.85.161.72 (talk) 08:26, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
[edit] russian dominatrix
I disagree about Ukraine in this article. My opinion is RW must be free from lie.— Unsigned, by: 78.85.72.248 / talk / contribs
[edit] "journalist"
Didn't the guy that got polonium have a history of service at the KGB? I thought he was a defected spy. --85.78.156.46 (talk) 18:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] As a russian....
I think this article requires work. Putin is a subject worthy of having an article full of fun on this wiki. I shall be working on this in the near future. Lichy (talk) 14:14, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Removal of Link
ZooGuard took my last link away saying "Pravda is shit". I know very well that Pravda is shit! I wanted the article in there because it was hilarious! If he, and others think it was not relevant to Putin then maybe it can stay out, but it was relevant to claims of psychotronic weapons. Incidentally laser weapons and rail guns are just high technology. The things mentioned by Putin's defence minister are science fiction - to my knowledge - and probably based on pseudo-science.
[edit] Picture
TheoryOfPractice, Would you mind telling me and everyone else why you took the brilliant picture of Putin away?! It was the best thing on the page.Zara Thustra (talk) 20:13, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
[edit] Putin - BADASS
Putin is a BADASS... not a "very mean man". He just acts mean to keep his badassness up.— Unsigned, by: 67.169.77.38 / talk / contribs
- You know, you could have done with only one section title.--ZooGuard (talk) 19:11, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- "One year later..." Osaka Sun (talk) 04:53, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
[edit] Putin reverted
My edit was reverted for 'changing the tone' of the article (I guess, to 'accurate'), and even the links I used to back up evidence of Litvinenko's MI6 funds was deleted; the commentator above remains unanswered regarding Litvinenko; I've been here a day and can already see the agenda the 'Rational' Wiki attends to push.
Dalandzadzi (talk) 20:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
I agree, this article is stupid. It's a couple of kids who don't know anything fooling around. SuperInfinity (talk) 12:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Litvinenko is not the only person who spoke out against Putin to be killed. Several actual journalists have been killed by Russian security forces on Putin's command, or by upper levels of those associated with Putin.ROPChain (talk) 09:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- No they haven't you idiot. You are a very simple-minded person. SuperInfinity (talk) 15:13, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- What about Anna Politkovskaya? --Drowninginlimbo (talk) 15:32, 26 July 2014 (UTC)