Talk:Voice of reason
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Delete[edit]
Unnecessary, poorly written, redundant and just crap. Innocent Bystander (talk) 16:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Vote for Deletion[edit]
Yes[edit]
- (Copy of above) Unnecessary, poorly written, redundant and just crap. Innocent Bystander (talk) 16:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- I first tagged the article -it's redundant and stubby. --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 18:32, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Seems to be the first thing that popped into somebody's head. Everyone thinks they're the voice of reason, the mere fact that a few unreasonable people do so too does not an article make. SophieWilder 20:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- So a few disagreeable people occasionally toss around a phrase, and that merits an article on said phrase? No. No it does not. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:18, 21 November 2013 (UTC)