Talk:Vortex-based math

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

What the hell is this crap? Spud (talk) 14:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

More of a comment than an article, isn't it? SophieWilderModerator 15:16, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I think you're missing the great service this article provides. Just this morning, I was puzzling over whether Vortex based math was indeed one of the greatest scientific revelations of all time, like all the kids at school say. So I came to Rational Wiki and discovered, rather, that "the math that describes a vortex is pretty neat and potentially useful for this or that."
Would you rather that I continued in my confusion? There's real value in this short article! Phiwum (talk) 15:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Any one of you could have summarily deleted this delightful bit of fluff.
There is a RW article in there somewhere, but it has not made its way here yet. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 16:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I've sort of tried to start to fix it. I have to say I haven't laughed so much since I found Time Cube. Doxys Midnight Runner (talk) 17:12, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Much better, even as a work-in-progress. Thanks! Phiwum (talk) 17:41, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I guess it's better now. I can't claim to understand it but that's obviously my problem. Spud (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────I expanded quite a bit and added some snark. I thought it was funny, anyway. Here's an article I wouldn't be embarrassed to show to my parents. Wehpudicabok [話] [変] [留] 11:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

I enjoyed writing about something other than Gamergate, for a change. Math really is fun, even bad math!  :) Wehpudicabok [話] [変] [留] 11:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support