Talk:White supremacy

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives for this talk page: , (new)



The Long List of Murders Committed by White Extremists Since the Oklahoma City Bombing[edit]

That's a lot. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 03:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Lack of argumentation[edit]

The whole page assumes white supremacy to be false, but it provides no argument for why this is the case. Why is pride in one's skin color being superior not ok? — Unsigned, by: 151.77.239.135 / talk / contribs

Because it's based entirely on falsehoods, inflated & undeserved sense of superiority, and outright denial of reality? Are you okay with black supremacy? How about that (fringe) female supremacy? Would you just as ardently defend someone who believed they were superior by dint of being a narcissist? If not, ask yourself why. 100.11.63.225 (talk) 02:15, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Incomplete[edit]

I agree with the content, but it's incomplete because "white supremacy" means more than what's included here. See wikipedia page and it's section "Academic use of the term." — Unsigned, by: 12.96.41.191 / talk / contribs


European Supremacy[edit]

So why do white supremacists always get angrily constipated about their right to celebrate "white" culture? If you are, say, Swiss or are of Swiss ancestry who is stopping you from celebrating your European heritage or culture? Yodelling, Fondue, Skiing, Watchmaking, money laundering and dressing up in colourful Lederhosen and Dirndl type costumes are all celebrating the Swiss aspects of European heritage and culture...right? Right! But white supremacists aren't interested in Mozart or Dadaism or even Wagner and Heidegger - all arguably part of European culture. Why is that? Because "culture" in WhiSup speak means "European people (including the "new world" settler variety) and their way of life dominating the world because they are superior to all other cultures and peoples." So white supremacy is the same as European supremacy. Makes "sense", no? The United States is just old Europe on steroids...the same pattern of imperial domination continues. The only difference is the American way of imperialism does not require formal colonization or a large number of Americans physically present in client states and subjugated territories. Which countries are "the enemy"? Iran, Iraq, North Korea, China, Afghanistan, Somalia, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Venezuela, Sudan etc. White (i.e. Western and Northern European) countries do not get bombed and sanctioned no matter what they do. And the US doesn't bomb and sanction itself for all the war crimes and torture and human rights abuses it commits.

It is quite clear which countries think they have a divine right to force other states and people to submit to their rule. Official American policy is world domination. Think about that next time you are not thinking about which "axis of evil" country or "rogue state" is getting bombed into the stone age. Think about that when you're arguing about "liberals" or "conservatives" like it makes a difference to the people of Mosul or Raqqa or Yemen or Pakistan what their killers "self-identify" as. Notice how the loudest Trump "haters" line up to love him when he bombs Muslim countries. Yes, you and you and you (not me because I am me and you are you) are a stooge for white supremacy. Yes, it's true...and you KNOW it and FEEL it and now you need to CONFRONT it and STOP pretending you are separate from it. Okay? Alright. OK. Good luck. And don't give me no Wikipedia grief about NPOV and crap like that. This is NOT Wikipedia! It is RationalWiki, n'est-ce pas? That's right and my Talk debut here is on the BLEEDING EDGE of rational (if also somewhat aroused and passionate but always always RATIONALLY so). Now get outta here and make yourself useful. Peace out. SpookMaster (talk) 04:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Film[edit]

The film 'White Vengeance' has nothing to do with the topic (but could be a useful misdirection). Anna Livia (talk) 20:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)