Talk:Why can't I own a Canadian?
From RationalWiki
Acer Blue 04:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
LOL! Kirk Johnson (talk) 07:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
I'd love to see a counter-counter-argument to that counter-argument at tektonics.org. - LucidFox (talk) 17:17, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Here it is: "The article claims that our objective intuitive morality shows that homosexuality is evil, and a very bad kind of evil. I say they're full of shit." (See my user page.) LiberalOfAnUnknownVariant (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'd go with "full of shit" as a counter-argument too. Some points don't need addressing, you just need to demonstrate clearly that they weren't even a counter-argument to begin with, which is usually far easier than refutation - hence a colour scheme can come in handy.
d hominem
17:31, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'd go with "full of shit" as a counter-argument too. Some points don't need addressing, you just need to demonstrate clearly that they weren't even a counter-argument to begin with, which is usually far easier than refutation - hence a colour scheme can come in handy.
This text was used almost word for word on an episode of the "West Wing". Does anyone know which came first? VOXHUMANA 03:13, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- The West Wing came second.
gnostic
06:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC)