Template talk:CollapseComment
From RationalWiki
EGGSELLENT!!!!
- Does it really need to say "Commentary:"? It seems a bit redundant, and might read badly with some "titles"? ħuman
15:25, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
- See: RationalWiki talk:Collapsible Comment System/testmk11ideas
ContribsTalk 15:29, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
- Quit linking to that, there's nothing to "read" there! Keeping track of the talk page (and I changed the link you provided to it...). Thanks! ħuman
15:44, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
- Sorry about that, It's just that 10-15 minutes ago you started editing about this template & I wanted to let you know that there were other discussions going on, so I spammed all over.
ContribsTalk 15:53, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
- S'ok, I'm sure it's a bit like popping in when Trent are busy building something - sandboxes of half-finished stuff all over the place, discussion on six talk pages, etc... and in the case of T & me it can be even worse, since we have sometimes discussed what we are doing on the phone, too. I only noticed it because you added the link to RW:help. I know it can be hard to develop something with more than two or three main workers (Gawd, I remember trying to fix the old version of the page you got after moving a page so the "old location" link was tagged &redirect=no, and Elassint kept trying to "help" - by checking my test articles, then deleting them with the comment "it works", then when I would do the test, it wouldn't work, because I was getting red links that "shouldn't" have been. At least Trent & I have a fairly good division of labor - he does all the programming, and I do the copywriting and formatting, so we don't really collide. Anyway, if I see anything I am concerned about, I'll leave comments on talkie pages, hopefully Jeeves part Deux will see them. Thanks! ħuman
17:48, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
- S'ok, I'm sure it's a bit like popping in when Trent are busy building something - sandboxes of half-finished stuff all over the place, discussion on six talk pages, etc... and in the case of T & me it can be even worse, since we have sometimes discussed what we are doing on the phone, too. I only noticed it because you added the link to RW:help. I know it can be hard to develop something with more than two or three main workers (Gawd, I remember trying to fix the old version of the page you got after moving a page so the "old location" link was tagged &redirect=no, and Elassint kept trying to "help" - by checking my test articles, then deleting them with the comment "it works", then when I would do the test, it wouldn't work, because I was getting red links that "shouldn't" have been. At least Trent & I have a fairly good division of labor - he does all the programming, and I do the copywriting and formatting, so we don't really collide. Anyway, if I see anything I am concerned about, I'll leave comments on talkie pages, hopefully Jeeves part Deux will see them. Thanks! ħuman
- Sorry about that, It's just that 10-15 minutes ago you started editing about this template & I wanted to let you know that there were other discussions going on, so I spammed all over.
- Quit linking to that, there's nothing to "read" there! Keeping track of the talk page (and I changed the link you provided to it...). Thanks! ħuman
- See: RationalWiki talk:Collapsible Comment System/testmk11ideas