Template talk:Newage
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Needs[edit]
Needs these before being good enough for use:
- better top tagline
- background images of rainbows (very faded, not garish) rather than blocks of solid colour - this requires referencing an image by its name in our repo (the unicorn pic is on Wikimedia Commons)
- more stuff for the key concepts
- David Gerard (talk) 14:49, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- OK. It's not possible to set background-image in MediaWiki syntax, the sanitiser removes it (unless you make the wiki open to arbitrary image includes, which is almost always bad). Anyone else up to making this shinier?
- OK, I think I've got the unremitting horror going now - David Gerard (talk) 22:33, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oh now that says New Age all over it. You've even put it in Papyrus... I think I'm going to vomit... narchist 10:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- I blame the loved one, who frequently tells me "there's nothing you can do that I can't make worse." She suggested Papyrus for the font and the wake of stars from the dolphin's fins - David Gerard (talk) 12:19, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Tag at the top[edit]
I liked "unifying principle" better, actually. It's such a dead-on parody of every new age text ever. "Dolphins and money" doesn't quite have the same punch, in my opinion. Wehpudicabok (talk) 04:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- So purty.En attendant Godot 17:12, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit]
Thing is, while I like the icon, I really like Röstigraben's icon, I intentionally left this out of my spree in order to keep the use of papyrus as the font. It's not a big deal to put an override into the master template, but it seemed a little pointless just for this one thing. ADK...I'll loll your memo! 18:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- I've reverted it to David's version while keeping the icon and the all-violet backdrop. The old design wasn't too different from the cookie-cutter navbars, so it'll still look consistent. Röstigraben (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)