User:Armondikov/MainPageRedesign

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to RationalWiki!

Cleaning up toxic waste spills in the waterways of public discourse.
(Теперь и на русском языке)

What is Going On?

Need to know What Is Going On? We present regularly updated selections of the finest lunacy the Internet has to offer. Participate in the dialogue.

Actual news from the "real world."
Quality articles by bloggers, submitted by the RW community.
Crazy articles from the clogged-up fringes of the Internet.
Our own main back-page.

Participate in RationalWiki

RedditLogo.png
Twitter logo.png
Facebook logo.png
Discord logo.png
RationalWiki portal:
See our guide for newcomers!
A brief history of RationalWiki...
Share how you found RationalWiki!
For general chatter that doesn't fit anywhere else, the Saloon Bar is the place to go.
Essay portal:
Essays written by individual users covering a wide range of subjects. Comment on the talk pages or write your own.
Debate portal:
Informal debates covering political and philosophical issues. Participate freely or start your own.
Writing articles:
Read up on what a RationalWiki page is and our community standards.
Take a look at the help pages if you're having trouble.
We also keep a list of useful links.
Our to do list is where we pile up ideas for articles. See if anything piques your interest!

Featured Article

The peer review process.

Peer review is the process of subjecting scholarly work to review by other experts in the field.

The term "peer review" is typically used for scientific and academic publications. When an article is submitted, it is sent to the authors' "peers" (i.e., other experts in the same field) to assess the quality of the work. A similar approach is generally taken to evaluate research proposals submitted to agencies for funding, such as the National Science Foundation (U.S.) or Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada), where the proposals are sent out to qualified scientists to assess whether the proposed projects merit funding.

Approval by peer review is a necessary but not sufficient criterion for quality work. It mostly judges basic competence, such as minimizing the chances that pseudoscience can masquerade as science, and filters out trivial or low-quality work that would not contribute anything of value.

See other approved cover stories.

Portals and Articles