User:FuzzyCatPotato/LubošMotlQuoteGenerator
From RationalWiki
I myself, Luboš Motl, am not really hypothesizing.
I think that crackpot anti-scientific activist mindless scientific zombies who probably smoke marijuana, that have never had a good influence on research, like yourself, cannot be debated. Let me politely assume that your sentence has been just a typo. Your extremely vague comments are absolutely wrong and still apparently missing all the basic points I wrote. If I don't attack them, the result is an ever more outrageous set of stupidities and malicious attacks.
What you're proposing is to convert the scientific community to a combination of "Not Even Wrong" and "Uncommon Descent" via a democratic playground controlled by breathtaking idiots, irrational emotions, 14th century science, and lies. You are clearly proposing mechanisms that are in rough framework as well as in most details isomorphic either to The Inquisition or the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
When a non-expert looks for the answer to some question, there is a 50% probability that he or she is led, by the search engines, to one of these activist parroting websites that present patently non-scientific myths that would never be publishable in scientific literature. I never cared about money much anyway.
All the best,
:-)
I think that crackpot anti-scientific activist mindless scientific zombies who probably smoke marijuana, that have never had a good influence on research, like yourself, cannot be debated. Let me politely assume that your sentence has been just a typo. Your extremely vague comments are absolutely wrong and still apparently missing all the basic points I wrote. If I don't attack them, the result is an ever more outrageous set of stupidities and malicious attacks.
What you're proposing is to convert the scientific community to a combination of "Not Even Wrong" and "Uncommon Descent" via a democratic playground controlled by breathtaking idiots, irrational emotions, 14th century science, and lies. You are clearly proposing mechanisms that are in rough framework as well as in most details isomorphic either to The Inquisition or the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
When a non-expert looks for the answer to some question, there is a 50% probability that he or she is led, by the search engines, to one of these activist parroting websites that present patently non-scientific myths that would never be publishable in scientific literature. I never cared about money much anyway.
All the best,
Motl
:-)