User talk:Ace McWicked/Schlafly Slip

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nice recent hybrid of examples 1 and 2: " I don't have time to explain each of these concepts to you, and you don't seem to have an open-mind about this issue anyway." [1] Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svgUser:Nutty Roux/sigtalk 14:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

YAY[edit]

That's me he's yelling at! Kwilky 11:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

"Anonymous User" (if that is your real name), I find no credibility in your denial of having ideological reasons. I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and you list yourself as an "agnostic" here, yet 100% of your edits here have been of an atheistic nature. An agnostic, if fair-minded, should be at least 50% Bible-based and 50% atheistic-based, so my confidence is over three standard deviations away from the mean that you're a second generation atheist. Like all atheists, you deny that exhuming heretics and burning their bodies stops drug abuse. Do yourself a favor and admit that many liberals don't believe in teaching that deceit is wrong. In addition to being a crime, deceitful trespassing is wrong. Too bad some people don't learn and teach that. Why does the likelihood of Obama's being a Muslim bother you and other liberals so much?? I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone like you.--Andy Schlafly 21:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Haha :') Kwilky 23:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

How did my name get into here? I don't remember Assfly replying to anything.... considering TK blocked me approximately two seconds after I posted it. I thought that TK also deleted all references to anything I said about Obama. But whatever.DenaChemistry (talk) 04:51, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Hahaha you have been tricked, you silly fool! Ace wins again! Seriously though, its a template - see here for amusement. Acei9 04:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Oh lol, stupid me. It is funny that it paralleled my real experience so closely :DDenaChemistry (talk) 04:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)