User talk:Albion Tourgee the Younger

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Albion Tourgee the Younger!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

If you are interested in contributing, please read what our articles are intended to be.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

I see you don't use the proper naming convention, I am 99% sure we'll never see an insightful edit from you. Like Obama. AceMcWicked 21:04, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

"Ace" (inappropriate name), that is such a liberal argument. I wasted time with your unsubstantial additions and you rely on hearsay, judges laugh at hearsay, so it's obvious to me you're not here to glorify the Lord Jesus Christ. And you persist in denying the obvious truth that homeschooling prevents school shootings. The answer to your silly question is this: feudalism had no commuting, no "lay offs," no "offshoring", fewer heinous crimes like today, no widespread breakups of marriage, no same-sex marriage, no drug addiction, etc. By the way, note how few liberals take the World History Midterm Exam. Being a liberal means merely pretending to be smarter, and it doesn't help that strategy to display one's actual knowledge. I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone like you.--aschlafly

[edit] Adding footnotes

Hey Albion. Your edit probably got reverted because the placement of the link was a bit random. If you intend it as a footnote, you should use the <ref> tag. Here's an example of your footnote attached to an arbitrary bit of text from the Originalism article:

Originalism refers to a school of thought concerning the interpretation of law by a judge. The idea behind originalism is that a law must be interpreted from the viewpoints extant at the time of its inception and not those of the present day. Originalism is popular with United States conservatives in general and conservative U.S. judges in particular.<ref>[http://www.libertary.com/books/unoriginal-misunderstanding Unoriginal Misunderstanding by Kenneth Shear (Libertary Editions 2009)]</ref> This can be best observed in the push for originalist judges to be nominated to positions where constitutional law cases will most likely be heard.

Just copy the underlined portion in to the source of the article. I don't know anything about that book, so I can't personally add the footnote.--ConcernedresidentAsk me about your mother 21:33, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support