User talk:BlueMoon

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, BlueMoon!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

[[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 15:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

"my favorite snark targets include George W. Bush" - oh it's so hard to let go... I remember a cartoon from the 2000 election: "I want Bush to win." "You're a republican?" "No, I'm a comedian, if he wins I get new material for my act every day." Totnesmartin 17:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, and I bet the same bunch were rooting for Palin. Still, I'd rather have a leader I like. One can always joke about loonies who aren't in power. BlueMoon 17:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm a confirmed Palin 2012er. As long as she never gets anywhere near the button, the lulz will be magnificent. Totnesmartin 18:07, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
A Palin/Cheney (or Cheney/Palin, I'm not fussy) ticket would provide plenty of campaign lulz while not providing much in the way of difficulty for Obama. BlueMoon 21:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Obvious naming problem is obvious[edit]

I regret to inform you that your account and IP are unlikely to finish the day unblocked over at the other site. 64.107.0.78 18:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, what? Are you saying my name will get me blocked on CP before my actions can? If that's the case, why did I just spend an hour rewriting their article on Black Holes? Please clarify which other site you mean if it's not CP. Agnostic Jewish Biologist 20:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Just wait and see buddy. Ace McWickedi9 21:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Satan[edit]

I reverted your edit:

"Also integral to the plot of the His Dark Materials trilogy by Phillip Pullman. Since reading those and the work of Jack Chick, when I read the word "Satan" I think "Vive la Revolution!" Because obviously the badass anti-servitude rebel angels are French."

The first sentence isn't one. Second sentence uses first person, poor writing style, zero content... third sentence, incomprehensible. In case you were curious. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Looking back, I should say thanks. You're right, and I shouldn't edit late at night when I'm too tired to make sense.