User talk:Faunas

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Faunas!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

If you are interested in contributing, please read what our articles are intended to be.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

Picon small.pngLiquid Blue 17:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Conspiracy theory thing.

I've moved it to the essay space. Feel free to go nuts there. Cheers, Theory of Practice "Now we stand outcast and starving 'mid the wonders we have made." 18:37, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Faunas (talk) 18:38, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Estulin

Nice work. Two things: one, try to avoid linking to that other obscure wiki. Two, the image needs to be credited/sourced. Let my inspiration flow/In token token lines suggesting rhythm. 14:36, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Also...

This. Let my inspiration flow/In token token lines suggesting rhythm. 14:37, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Seriously, please stop.

Please don't create links to WP (see above). Especially, please don't link to TV Tropes for no good reason. Thanks! Let my inspiration flow/In token lines suggesting rhythm. 19:26, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

OK, I'll admit it. I'm the one who created the TV Tropes article (I even quote RW on the YMMV page!) and I'm the only one who edits that thing (so no quackery over there). On links to WP, weren't these to be avoided only on the bodies of the articles, i.e., we could link to WP on the end, so people know more about the thing in question? Faunas (talk) 19:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
The guidelines say "please don't link to Wikipedia." If people want to learn more, maybe we should write better articles? I dunno? Let my inspiration flow/In token lines suggesting rhythm. 19:36, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't have a problem with linking to Wikipedia in order to explain something that's not general knowledge but is off-mission. SophieWilder 22:08, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Gardner

I don't know if it had anything to do with the gender studies project, but thank you for creating the article on Gardner.--Token Conservative (talk) 22:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. No, it didn't have anything to do with the gender studies project, it's just that I had an axe to grind - those people who foam at the idea of Gardner being "pro-pedophile", when this is not true, and who misrepresent Gardner's research; i.e., I had an axe to grind for the truth. Faunas (talk) 08:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
If you have an axe to grind, RW mainspace may not be the place for it. Would you like to host the article in your own userspace instead, if the deletion effort is successful? Ochotona princepsnot a pokémon 10:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Well, if my axe to grind is the truth (along with the use of fallacies against Gardner), then RW is the place. If the deletion effort is successful, then I'll host it in my userspace instead, or in an essay. Faunas (talk) 10:22, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Lady Catherine's talk page

Please don't go bothering RW users who haven't made any edits for two full years (to the day) to go support your article. Thanks. Ochotona princepsnot a pokémon 20:40, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support