User talk:Fox/Archive3
Contents |
[edit] Article
Nice article, I hope it is for us although if you could post it over you know where.... - User
07:37, 27 November 2008 (EST)
- The incipit reminds me of... Ed Poor's essays: "Historian X.Y. asserts that...". :-D Editor at CPOh, Finland! Why? 07:43, 27 November 2008 (EST)
- Actually that is not his essays that is how he thinks you write articles with a neutral point of view, instead of a single continuous objective prose they us at WP. - User
07:58, 27 November 2008 (EST)
- Actually that is not his essays that is how he thinks you write articles with a neutral point of view, instead of a single continuous objective prose they us at WP. - User
This article over at CP includes a lot about Rome based antisemitism. I wonder how it managed to survive so long? Special:Contributions/84.135.219.139
- Your "Christian Antisemitism" article comes at a most opportune time. Exactly when we are discussing how to react to essays/articles for which there is no consensus. I have no particular axe to grind on the issue in question, but it will be interesting to see how it goes down. I hope that you don't find yourself floundering in the vandal bin.--Bobbing up 15:44, 27 November 2008 (EST)
[edit] Message from the RationalWiki Ministry of Demotion and Personal Impediment
|
Dear Fox/Archive3, We regret to inform you that you have been demoted to the rank of sysop. You are requested to report to a bureaucrat, at your nearest possible convenience, to be assigned a mop and bucket for the purposes of cleaning up the mess around here. If you have any further questions please refer to the enclosed pamphlet So you are now a sysop. Your Sincerely, Sir Reginald Albert Humfildink-Hollingsworth the Third, |
Well, you go away for a couple of days sightseeing on the Borean Tundra, and come back to find this on your talk page! What is the world coming to? I shall formulate a block policy of my very own now that I have become an Officer Orifice of this organisation and immediately spam obsequious and fawning praise to the site owner, Randy Zipfly, while intimidating all other contributors with thinly veiled threats. /removes tongue from cheek, heads to janitor's closet. Fox 04:51, 4 December 2008 (EST)
[edit] Sic transit ...
08:30, 7 December 2008 Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) changed group membership for User:Fox from Block, edit and Upload to (none) (inactivity and prior self-removal of user pages) (again) Fortinbrass 09:20, 7 December 2008 (EST)
- IMO, it's for the better ;-) The whole procedure of unblocking yourself - posting a comment - re-blocking yourself reminded me of someone who places the cookie jar on top of his highest shelf, but doesn't stop to pinch a bit... --LArron 09:26, 7 December 2008 (EST)
[edit] Hi Foxy
![]()
and marmite 05:18, 25 February 2009 (EST) (SusanG)
- Morning, and back at ya =) Fox 05:48, 25 February 2009 (EST)
- I think Ed's half (mommy's half) Jewish if I remember aright.

and marmite 06:33, 25 February 2009 (EST)
- I think Ed's half (mommy's half) Jewish if I remember aright.
[edit] I see you've returned.
Since you went away reluctantly I left RationalWiki as well. Some of those who vandalize Conservapedia are just out and out cyberbullies in my opinion. I worked hard, tried to use my effort and intelligence to help build RationalWiki. The cyberbullies rewarded my work by targeting me. I'm now devoted to other wikis. I'm seeing what I can do for smaller wikis, notably Liberapedia as well as Atheism Wiki and Wikia Fiction. I could have done the same for RationalWiki. It was not to be. Take care that people here can't recognise your username elsewhere or they may follow you. Proxima Centauri 06:54, 25 February 2009 (EST)
- Paranoia strikes.

and marmite 07:13, 25 February 2009 (EST)
[edit] ...and welcome back
Hey, happy to see you here again, hope you stay around for awhile. :-) Refugeetalk page 11:43, 25 February 2009 (EST)
- This should be good for a larf. You gonna get all liquored up again, play the victim and scream at us to call you on the phone? TheoryOfPractice 14:34, 25 February 2009 (EST)
- Hehe I wouldn't need to get pissed to nonchalantly direct vitriol at a low-life, no-hope loser like you ;) It wouldn't even be sport. Fox 13:10, 27 February 2009 (EST)
[edit] What happened to your essay?
(Repeat subject line). It looked like it was coming along quite well (I didn't read it in great detail). If you want a point to your essay, looking at the multiple causes of antisemitism is pretty important. Christianity is hardly unique in its antisemitism but church doctrine and theology ways a huge contributing factor to its prevalence. Islamic antisemitism is the next obvious one, especially as it was a late nineteenth century imam or something who's teaching formed a lot of the basis of what would become Nazism. You could do a whole series on the types, causes and effects of antisemitism looking towards ways of combating it. It is a fairly unique form of racism in that it attacks one group for historical and religious reasons and is so widespread. Just my thoughts. - User
20:20, 20 March 2009 (EDT)
[edit] Contributions
Nice work. - User
18:52, 21 March 2009 (EDT)
- /bows Why thankee. What I'd learned from CP was that I was the only sysop who could spot "British" humour, and several of my socks spent many weeks transcribing the works of Roger Melly into CP. The other thing I'd discovered was that CP sysops tended in the main to be dumbasses who were blinded by science: hence, several socks set to work ensuring that very plausible-sounding technicalities went unnoticed. It was a labour of love, my love for Teacake and Ed Moon. Enjoy trying to find them, Terry XD Fox 19:11, 21 March 2009 (EDT)
[edit] You here
I like having you here. You make RW a more interesting place, in the way it was initially idealized to be - a place where people could discuss, debate, disagree, without fear of the stupid banhammer we all saw at CP. So, as I said, it's nice having you around. You add an element RW (desperately) needs. ħuman
22:58, 21 March 2009 (EDT)
- I second that observation, and I was interested in reading your take on the efficiency of birth control in England, even though I didn't have the time to research or put in my 0.02. I also enjoy having an agreeable person around with whom I disagree with, makes things more interesting, as Human said. Javasca₧


23:56, 21 March 2009 (EDT)
[edit] aSK account
I registered "Fox" on aSK with the vague idea of socking it up, but I've changed my mind, so if you want it, I can email you the username/password and you can have the account. -SockDrawer 03:06, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
- I thought it was someone taking the piss so I blocked the name XD Although if you send me the password I think it might be less confusing if I use that name and abandon the other one, with a redirect. I think. (Sorry, opiate mode =/) Fox 08:37, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
Can you perhaps help improve this article on Israel? I'm fighting Palestinian attack. Proxima Centauri 15:04, 22 April 2009 (EDT)
- Having just read it, it is mostly harmless, as these things go. Fox 01:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] OI! Fox!
Get out here buddy! Are you too scared to face me or are you busy with a Jinx in your Foxhole? Come on buddy, I am going to thrash you, then I'll be champion! Oh, what am I saying? Your too pussy to face me down. Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 06:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hm, I have no idea what you are wittering on about. Fox 00:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, er um, I was trying to call you out and challange you to a round of Jinx baiting. It was sometime ago and I gave into peer pressure. Never mind. Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 02:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Just sayin'
You youtube link is borken. Just sayin'. ĵ₳¥ášÇ♠ʘ hi there! 23:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- You leaving? - π 23:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- That is true, but I liked it when you came around a discussed the merits of shit in a can. Oh well, good luck with what ever you do. - π
- RW is a childish hangout for adults who really should be doing something more productive with their lives. You didn't know that? MarcusCicero (talk) 08:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ecce Homo Insults will get you everywhere, they are so convincing. ħuman
08:56, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ecce Homo Insults will get you everywhere, they are so convincing. ħuman