User talk:Franklin

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Thank you! I know youre busy but any contributions you make will be greatly appreciated. --PalMD-yada yada 23:01, 1 June 2007 (CDT)

So you are PalMD? One of the sysops at CP seemed to think I was you.--Franklin 23:02, 1 June 2007 (CDT)

What I sorted out is that they didn't think I was you, but that they thought someone who commented on the discussion was me. Our styles of engagement, however, are not dissimilar. See this [1] and this [2]

--PalMD-yada yada 23:39, 1 June 2007 (CDT)

Hi Franklin! Many people here enjoyed your exchange on Franklin (as did I), but I was particularly pleased by the New Ordeal bit. I assume you found what RobS was talking about over here, but just in case you didn't (or others want to see what his supposed proof was), it's [Conservapedia:New Ordeal|here]. My guess at this point is that Rob grew up in an anti-new-deal family, and someone in the family called it that, and he really didn't understand that it's not a standard term. And now...well, I've not seen any evidence that he knows how to say he was wrong, no matter how obvious or trivial the issue. --jtltalk 23:28, 1 June 2007 (CDT)

Welcome to this place, please tell Icewedge nobody loves him. Həlios-speak to me! 01:33, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

How hypocritical of you Helios. -ĬŴΣĐĝё 01:34, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

Welcome. --Linus(plot evil tech) 14:27, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

You've been here ages, yet I've never seen you? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:19, 22 October 2008 (EDT)

A troll?[edit]

Why would you suggest that I'm a troll? And I would thank you to keep such obscenity as "he*l" off my talk page. --SimonA 14:29, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

Who knows? Maybe you are. And if "hell" bothers you, then fuck you. Is that obsecenity enough for you?

I think he*l bothers him, probably something to do with the asterisk. He never said hell was bad. Jrssr5 10:19, 15 June 2007 (CDT)

According to...[edit]

Franklin, I cleaned up your post on Template:RationalWiki MainPage/AccordingTo a little. I also used the post on WillN's talk page where TK warns him to be careful and I added Andy's censorship on the same topic. Feel free to change the link back if you think the one on TK's page is better. olliegrind 09:07, 21 June 2007 (CDT)

Hi, I've just moved that item to the what's going on page because I felt it didn't fit in the 'According to' section. Although that sadly loses it from the front page now. Also I added an extra link showing andy removing Ames a second time --Stevo 09:18, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
Ollie and Stevo: Thanks! I am not the most proficent person in the world with computers, so thanks for cleaning that up.--Franklin 09:26, 21 June 2007 (CDT)

Sysop[edit]

You have been here for aaaaaaages! Acei9 00:51, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, but I really don't do that much.

Yeah, he doesn't even indent or sign his god damn posts. Occasionaluse (talk) 20:14, 13 September 2010 (UTC)