User talk:Hipocrite/Archive4
From RationalWiki
This is an archive page, last updated 24 April 2015. Please do not make edits to this page.
Contents |
[edit] Argue with me some more hipocrite, where'd you go?
What happened?Tex an (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
[edit] I saw that
http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&curid=69484&diff=1223980&oldid=1223979
It's good that you reverted it, but clearly you treat rape as a joke and belittle the people who take it seriously.
–Александр(а) (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 19:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- RAPE RAPITY RAPE RAPE RAPE. Hipocrite 20:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- There's a difference between "making a joke about rape" and "making a joke about people who bring rape up all the time." You, ehrenstein, have come to be seen as "the person who brings up rape all the time." This might just possibly be because you continually brought rape up all the time. You have also made several enemies here, but no allies, possibly because you kep accusing people who disagrees with you of libel, bigotry, ableism etc. Your continual arguing and lawyering makes you an irritating and unsympathetic character. You're in a hole and you don't know when, or even whether, to stop digging. SophieWilder
21:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- Fair enough. –Александр(а) (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 21:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- There's a difference between "making a joke about rape" and "making a joke about people who bring rape up all the time." You, ehrenstein, have come to be seen as "the person who brings up rape all the time." This might just possibly be because you continually brought rape up all the time. You have also made several enemies here, but no allies, possibly because you kep accusing people who disagrees with you of libel, bigotry, ableism etc. Your continual arguing and lawyering makes you an irritating and unsympathetic character. You're in a hole and you don't know when, or even whether, to stop digging. SophieWilder
[edit] Google Books
Go search for either of their books, do a search for that statistic. Not fucking rocket science. –Aleksandr Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 16:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- No. I don't waste my time checking the facts of documented fabricators. You do it. Hipocrite 16:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- http://lmgtfy.com/?q=1.4+million+women+raped –Aleksandr Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 16:06, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Does not support your assertion that "Beevor and Kershaw both support 1.4 million Nazi women." Contradicts it, in fact. "Antony Beevor describes it as the "greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history", and has concluded that at least 1.4 million women were raped in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia alone." Could you please list your other fabrications? Hipocrite 16:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- First, what page is saying that? There are a lot of sensationalist webpages out there, usually crap newspapers that are trying to sound impressive. I also wouldn't dispute that it's one of the largest events in mass rape, though I would argue that mass rape by the Nazis was far higher, although it might not have been one single event. –Aleksandr Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 16:37, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Does not support your assertion that "Beevor and Kershaw both support 1.4 million Nazi women." Contradicts it, in fact. "Antony Beevor describes it as the "greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history", and has concluded that at least 1.4 million women were raped in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia alone." Could you please list your other fabrications? Hipocrite 16:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
[edit] Sometimes the best way to argue with somebody
Is to use their citation against them. Zero (talk) 14:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC)