User talk:Human/Archive10

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This usely to cher is suspas appepets abusiveat in officpupry, and harently uted of socksed pupcial mopetb votes.

This is an archive page, last updated 27 March 2015. Please do not make edits to this page.
Archives for this talk page: <0>, <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>, <8>, <9>, <11>, <12>, <13>, <14>, <15>, <16>, <17>, <18>, <19>, <20>, <21>, <22>, <23>, <24>, <25>, <26>, <27>, <28>, <29>, <30>, <31>, (new)(back)

Contents

[edit] vandalize

SleepingGoats.jpg
This

Page

Needs

More

Goat



GHammer and Sickle text gold.svgdlessLiberal 22:16, 31 October 2007 (EDT)

It sure does. Nice to see you back :) humanUser talk:Human 23:09, 31 October 2007 (EDT)
Speaking of that, can I be a sysop again? ΓHammer and Sickle text gold.svgδλεσςΛιβεραλ 14:47, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
Of course. humanUser talk:Human 14:51, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
Just in time; we need to start creating some content to that NT and Bodhan don't become the sole purpose of the site.--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 14:52, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
"Content"? What's that? humanUser talk:Human 14:54, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
When I am made the ruler of this site, you will be banned for that. Bohdan 14:55, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
Thanks, human. Bohdan, my powers are at your disposal. ΓHammer and Sickle text gold.svgδλεσςΛιβεραλ 14:55, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
Oh noes!!! flees the coming armagoatdon humanUser talk:Human 15:02, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
In attempt to undermine Bohdan's future reign And bring about my own I hereby request Cratship, and anything else that you can throw in. Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 15:17, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
I thought you already were, Pinto bean guy. Did you get to play with the tools and have them taken away after the fun was over? humanUser talk:Human 17:57, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
No, I never was a Crat. Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 18:00, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
Of course, doh, I was mixing it up with syslopness. Oh well. humanUser talk:Human 18:03, 3 November 2007 (EDT)
The 'vaporize' tab makes it a lot more tempting to delete stuff... it just sounds so much cooler! I'm going to go create random stuff and delete it. ΓHammer and Sickle text gold.svgδλεσςΛιβεραλ 18:22, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

[edit] Thank u...

...for the compliment. | DINESENyep? 01:22, 4 November 2007 (EDT)

You are fully welcome. humanUser talk:Human 01:31, 4 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] Red Links

Is there a way to find articles that have loads of redlinks? I'm envisioning a list of pages sorted by number of redlinks in descending order. Sort of like a reverse Wanted Pages. That might be an efficient way of going after them, and also of tracking down serial redlink-creators for horsewhipping goatwhipping.--Bayesupdate 16:18, 6 November 2007 (EST)

Here 162.82.215.199 16:20, 6 November 2007 (EST)
Wanted pages shows a list of non-extant pages that are linked to. I'm thinking of a list of extant pages sorted by the number of redlinks that they contain.--Bayesupdate 16:34, 6 November 2007 (EST)
Yeah, I know what you mean - a gold mine list. I try to find them by following "odd" entries on the wp list - scored two gems today, one a subpage of hoji's (it's his cp page, unedited, so it's full of links that don't work), and the awful [[essay:New World Order]] page, which I removed, I swear, a hundred links from today. (wp went from 905 to 770 in the last couple hours...). But there ought to be a way to do what you suggest. I just don't know how. So I'd suggesting asking Trent and/or Linus, they have more skills, especially on back end stuff, which might be required.
Speaking of red links, do you want to remove this one, now that the essay is gone? (Anyone else, and I'd do it myself with an explanation and an apology, but I'd rather ask you first.) Thanks, Researcher 03:29, 19 December 2007 (EST)
Done, and hey, feel free to do it yourself when you find anything like that on my pages. It's always easy to revert if there was a reason for a link... humanUser talk:Human 14:13, 19 December 2007 (EST)
Danke, and will do. Researcher 15:41, 19 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Thanks

Well, I've managed to block you for pi minutes, but I can't seem to unblock you. It tells me that the Block ID isn't found. Any suggestions? Stile4aly 23:20, 10 November 2007 (EST)

The block may have expired before you tried to undo it. You could try a longer time, check out the various block logs that can be looked at, note that when you go to block a user you can see their block history below the boxes you fill in... humanUser talk:Human 13:11, 11 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] Creation

Hey how do we create accounts on conservapedia, managed it once...but can't see to find it again. When i look at the login/create account I don't see a create any account button.The LoraxSlackers! 01:11, 11 November 2007 (EST)

They're likely on account creation lockdown. Happens :-P It should be back up tomorrow, I think their servers take the Lord's day off :-)-αmεσ (spy) 13:14, 11 November 2007 (EST)
It gets turned off at night - usually around 9 PST (12 EST). I think it's automatic, though my sock has been unable to edit sometimes at 8:50, and sometimes I'm still able to edit at 9:30. Perhaps it's manually turned on/off. --Ζωροάστρης 00:49, 13 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] Your on RW beta right?

Can you see if you can make this more visually appealing? Tables maybe? tmtoulouse annoy 00:45, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Can you make the poll thing run on one line only? And not create a blank line before it? Otherwise, it looks pretty good already. Maybe the arrows could be "thumbs up" and "thumbs down"? buttons in the middle, options to left and right of them? humanUser talk:Human 00:56, 13 November 2007 (EST)
Okay I will work on it. tmtoulouse annoy 00:59, 13 November 2007 (EST)
Check again? tmtoulouse annoy 01:34, 13 November 2007 (EST)
OK, the thumbs are cool. I wish it was easy to tell you what I mean. Put the thumbs in the "middle" making the vote obvious. Text to the left and right. And make it centered automatically? But it's getting better... all the time... it can't get now worse, hehe humanUser talk:Human 02:32, 13 November 2007 (EST)
Okay, I am done for tonight its 4 am. Take a look and see what you think and see what others think. tmtoulouse annoy 03:54, 13 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] Timeout

I think that 209.17.190.78 needs a timeout. --Edgerunner76 15:02, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Thank you. --Edgerunner76 15:18, 13 November 2007 (EST)

You're welcome. humanUser talk:Human 15:19, 13 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] WIGO

I have ported the system over from Beta to the main wiki and set-up an example at User:Tmtoulouse/wigosample when you get a chance... tmtoulouse annoy 17:21, 13 November 2007 (EST)


[edit] C.E. Young'uns

Good name. On principle I like to choose my own, but I must admit I have no ideas coming to me at the moment. Did I choose mostly youngsters (of course, we must count the man-child Andy as a youngster)? I wasn't aware. Then again, the collective naivete makes me assume so many of them are children (is Ken really older than 16?).

Thanks. I just came up with after naming my team, and picked your team as a possible use of the name. Mostly I was trying to spread the silly team naming meme to other users, though. humanUser talk:Human 20:44, 13 November 2007 (EST)

By the way, 'Tony Franciosa used to date my mom'. I guess that's not the same guy though. DickTurpis 20:41, 13 November 2007 (EST)

No, not the same guy. Did the one who dated your mom know how to execute a perfect double-switch? humanUser talk:Human 20:44, 13 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] proposed block

http://70.184.229.61. Click on the link and see why. Elassint Throw things at me

Is this IP editing our stuff? I couldn't find it easily in recent changes... humanUser talk:Human 20:53, 13 November 2007 (EST)
The ip address belongs to the Westboro Baptist Church. Elassint Throw things at me
Yes, I saw that, but there's no point in pro-actively blocking IPs, is there? The IP hasn't edited here at all, and may never try. Unless I am missing something here... humanUser talk:Human 21:00, 13 November 2007 (EST)
Agreed, unless/until this IP or a user from this IP makes edits that we deem objectionable then there isn't much point in going out of our way to block it. CЯacke®

[edit] oops

Can you finish archiving tmtidiots page for me? I could delete the stuff fine, but when I went to paste it in "archive 9" I couldn't do it. Obviously tmt is at fault. Thanks in advance. Bohdan 15:35, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Gee, yeah, what happened to your skillz? You mean I have to rollback your deletion first, too? Since I can't paste what you cut, can I? I done did it. humanUser talk:Human 16:03, 14 November 2007 (EST)
Actually, you could have gone in the history and copied from before I did anything. I could not paste such a large amount of material, tmtoulouse is a fool for not archiving sooner. I am about to propose a community ban against him. Can I count on your vote? Bohdan 16:05, 14 November 2007 (EST)
Sure, I'll vote. Which way, I will not reveal in advance of the plebiscite, of course. humanUser talk:Human 16:07, 14 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] Susan's playing

I'm gonna be playing with templates & some help files for a couple of hours. I'll clear up after (unless it works!)  :-p. Susan... purrrrrr ... 19:17, 14 November 2007 (EST)

HA! Thanks for the heads up, I'll turn up my freakout threshold for the duration ;) humanUser talk:Human 20:23, 14 November 2007 (EST)
Have a few tall cool ones or some short single malted ones, (NO ICE). CЯacke®

[edit] Deletion

Why did you delete [[Encyclopedia Dramatica]]? Ron Paul 21:32, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Stupidity, mostly (of the article and its subject). See Fun:Encyclopedia Dramatica if you think you can improve it. humanUser talk:Human 21:35, 14 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] Excuse me.

Please stop vandalising my userpage psst.. I'm on your side — Unsigned, by: A Conservative / talk / contribs

Oh, but it was so much fun! And it helps build your cover. humanUser talk:Human 20:19, 15 November 2007 (EST)

OK. And just so you know, i am a sockpuppet of Elassint

I know. humanUser talk:Human 20:24, 15 November 2007 (EST) And why are we whispering?
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you! I didn't know there were sockpuppets allowed here!CЯacke® 20:27, 15 November 2007 (EST)
Oh, grow the fuck up Cracker. (Stoopid username) Toe Tapping Republican
Hey, keep your feet in your own stall, buddy! humanUser talk:Human 21:09, 15 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] War on Christmas

Added a link. I remember the fooferaw when it happened. (They fixed it shortly thereafter.) Researcher 23:54, 15 November 2007 (EST)

Got it, thanks very much. I suspected you, of all people, might have sources... BOR is insane... humanUser talk:Human 23:57, 15 November 2007 (EST)
I'm a big believer in sources, but I had to go look it up, because while I remembered it, I hadn't bothered to research it first. Researcher 23:59, 15 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] Crat

Any chance you could give me crat status? It is possible that we may need someone to have those powerz while the US sleeps.--Bobbing up 04:13, 16 November 2007 (EST)

Thy will be done. I trusteth thou. Or something like that. Uze yr pwrz fr gud nt evl! humanUser talk:Human 02:34, 20 November 2007 (EST)
Good. Thanks. :-)--Bobbing up 04:45, 20 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] Censoring my comment on Cracker's page

No, I don't mind that you did that - I think it speaks to what we're trying to get at - If I don't think links to the Nazi Party belong of W-power's userpage, I shouldn't have a hard time with you toning down the strong language that I was using only to make a point.PFoster 22:50, 18 November 2007 (EST)

I'm glad you don't mind - the original is, of course, in the edit record. I really, truly, appreciate your commment and perspective. You wanna know why I hate comedy central sometimes? Because they play n----r "comedy". I don't want to get comfortable using that word. Ever. No matter how much black comedians use it. I hope this response makes sense? humanUser talk:Human 00:29, 19 November 2007 (EST)
I agree. However I have a question, what is going on around here? By that I mean that it seems that there has been more tension between editors around here than usual in the past week or so. Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 01:22, 19 November 2007 (EST)

maybe it has something to do with all the nazi/white supremicist garbage that the site has been attracting ever since RW and Metapedia got each other in their sights? Cause that's been pissing me off to no end and making RW way less fun than it used to be. PFoster 14:22, 19 November 2007 (EST)

I don't think so - we've had plenty of little spats or discussions over time. The fact that none have turned into outright decampments to war is pretty cool. And, yeah, PFoster, we managed to get lined up for a particular insidious brand of wandalism. Which gets us arguing the free speech vs. censorship issue, even though we are probably all clustered very close together on whatever spectrum could be drawn for that issue. humanUser talk:Human 14:29, 19 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] Thanks (2)

Just realised that you'd changed the background colour on the ? piccy - thanks. Susan... miaow ... 07:13, 20 November 2007 (EST)

*
* *
* * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * *
* *    * *
*      *

(Soostar) Susan... miaow ... 08:35, 20 November 2007 (EST)

Aw, thanksies! Wasn't that days ago? As I recall it took about eleven seconds to do... and you're welcome! humanUser talk:Human 14:02, 20 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] Contest

Done. Though the scores are not official. I tallied up the final scores for the fantasy league and posted the winners. Congratulations, you won the 7 player division, by a good margin too. DickTurpis 15:04, 20 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] Editing

Cheers for editing my stuff, I'm lazy at proof reading things. Question though, shouldn't Earth, the Sun and The Moon (when referring to Earth's natural satellite) be capitalised as proper names? --JeɚvsYour signature uses all my CPU time... 18:08, 27 November 2007 (EST)

YVW. As far as that, it's a tough call sometimes. Certainly not with a "the" in front of them, no. It's "the moon, which we pretentiously call Luna, rules the night while the sun, a/k/a Sol, rules the day as seen from our planet, which we call Terra". See how Sol and Luna are like Jupiter, but the words earth, sun and moon are not proper nouns. Similarly, universe is not either. Since there was some slight inconsistency in the article, I decided to run the way I did - if it had been entirely internally consistent, I would have left it alone probably. The tough call is when "earth" is uaed without "the" - "The moon lights Earth's nighttime sky" vs. "The moon pees on the earth's evenings" makes my head potentially hurt. I've also got your creation/social history thing in my sights ;)
By the way, that moon/sun article is awesome. That was a lot of work just to school a bunch of twits! humanUser talk:Human 19:02, 27 November 2007 (EST)
Yeah, one day I'll finish that article. It's just tedious, because I have to actually try and find books I own. --JeɚvsYour signature uses all my CPU time... 19:11, 27 November 2007 (EST)


[edit] hydrogen from cellulose

I added this to the hydrogen article. But as you're always interested in alternative energy I thought I draw your attention to it here. --Bobbing up 14:51, 28 November 2007 (EST)

Thanks, that's a cool article! The whole AE field is ripe for apollo-mission level research and development revolutions and successes, IMHO, as long as oil-soaked (US) politicians don't continue to hamstring it. Oh well, due to US peak oil passing 30 odd years ago, at least we won't get more generations of patchiots out of texas...

[edit] d00d

You have an awesome quarter collection!!1!1 --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 21:26, 28 November 2007 (EST)

Haha, thanks! I actually only have about 2/3 of them, the images were copped at the us mint website. wikipedia has monster hi res images of all of them. The last five were just announced, so I got to load them up.
Here is what I have, which shows what I need, hint hint: http://home.comcast.net/~human747/quarters.htm & check out the uberkewl map I made in a obsessive minute or 200. humanUser talk:Human 21:40, 28 November 2007 (EST)

[edit] Jeb and Metapedia

With the exception of User:WHITE POWER all of the "nazi socks", including me, are Jeb socks. Also Jeb is not a MP user actually, just a visitor and defender against left-wing propaganda. Duo 22:29, 30 November 2007 (EST)

Gee, thanks. But from now on I'm going to call all nazi-esque visitors here the "Teletubby Gang" humanUser talk:Human 22:37, 30 November 2007 (EST)
And we know that you all take orderz from Elassint! humanUser talk:Human 22:41, 30 November 2007 (EST)
teletubbies on the march!!!
This, at least is true. But Teletubby Gang" has a nice ring as well.--Bobbing up 08:39, 2 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Nav keyword

Remember how you asked if the keyword could be hidden on the help pages (helpnav keyword)? - dun it! Susanpurrrrr ... 07:13, 2 December 2007 (EST)

Excellent! I don't remember how it was a problem (ie, the old format), but certainly works now! humanUser talk:Human 15:22, 4 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Name Change

Hey Human, can you change my username from "Olliegrind" to "BeastmasterGeneral" (without the quotes)? Thanks! ollïegrïnd 13:36, 4 December 2007 (EST)

OK, I did it. You better check to make sure everything works properly for you
And check your sig if it's custom. humanUser talk:Human 14:00, 4 December 2007 (EST)
THANKS! The Beastmäster General 15:15, 4 December 2007 (EST)
You are most welcome. I see the new clothes seem to be fitting nicely! humanUser talk:Human 15:21, 4 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] welsh colour

[ http://www.undermilkwood.net/prose_undermilkwood.html Sloe black! ] Susanpurrrrr ... 20:14, 4 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] It would be funny, if it weren't so horrifying

Whilst I was wondering about dar interwebs, I came across this wonderfully loony site. I'll spare you the link to it, but it's called the "Liberty Guard of New America", one of those kooky militant anti-government sites. Oh, hell, here's the link: [1]. It's telling just how off-mainstream they are that the first ten listings in Google mentioning the organization consisted of newspaper articles mentioning them in passing and, believe it or not, their Myspace page. I found Ed Brown reasonable (or, as reasonable as holing yourself up in your wooded home and calling for revolution can be), right up until he started mentioning the Illuminati.

As for their revised constitution, this has got to be my favorite part:

"Freedom of Religion" therefore as such; shall be enforced in New America as the the public display of worship of Jesus The Christ alone. This preservation shall not include those who would chose to allegedly serve "god" through any "secret societies" or "closed to public access" dark questionable-christian formats that are punishable by penalty of law. It is NOT mandatory for one to be a protestant Christian in New America, but no other religion shall be preserved or protected by the New American Constitution. Neither shall any other religion be practiced in any public venue. Nor shall any other religion indoctrination materials or forms of persuasion be allowed. To attempt to do so is TREASON.

I half expect them to say something about upholding the white race, too.

Care to join me in ripping it apart, just for fun? --My cat is smarter than Andrew Schafly RA harass stalk 02:25, 6 December 2007 (EST)

Hahaha, I think I have seen that before. It's, er, batshit insane of course. I find it hilarious - I would only find it scary if it were written in decent English. And used real math! Note in the Executive thing, it's a 12 member council, with 6 year terms, and two people are replaced every two years. Does not compute... In fact, even the opening section is fairly illiterate. Reads like it was written as a first draft by an angry drunk with poor language skills at 3 in the morning. The only drag to ripping it apart would be reproducing enough (or all) of it to be fair and clear - there's an awful lot of gibberish to be copied over, and our reader's eyes will fall out of their sockets. Still, it might be fun... do you want to whip up a format in a sandbox so we can see how it looks? humanUser talk:Human 13:49, 6 December 2007 (EST)
I'm playing here. Feel free to copy it to your own sandbox to work on. Please don't edit my version for now. Although comments on the sandbox talk page are welcome. humanUser talk:Human 14:46, 6 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Thanks (3)

Thanks for the prompt thing on the EC page. (I'm at work, and can't always look things up like I'd like.) If you're interested, two times when the popular vote winner lost the election were in 1820 (I think) when Jackson lost to JQ Adams, and in 1876 when Tilden lost to Hayes. However, in each case, it wasn't that one won the EC, but instead other factors were at play. (No one won the EC in 1820, sending it to the House; returns from 4 states were disputed in 1876, resulting in a VERY corrupt bargain.)

By the way--you seriously rock. Researcher 19:30, 6 December 2007 (EST)

Aw, shucks, thanks. I'd return the compliment but then we'd have 12 other RWians over here telling us to get a room!
One thing the current EC does do (I should mention it over there) is solve the "no one won" problem, especially in serious 3-way races. It let JFK win with just under 50%, and of course Clinton with under 40% (IIRC) in the '92 3-way race. Of course, there are better ways of doing this, my favorite of which is IRV. Instant Runoff Voting lets people vote for their real first choice first, and order their 2nd, 3rd, etc. after that, as I'm sure you know. Which would give 3rd (etc.) parties a chance to show their real support, even if they don't/can't win. EG, we'd know who Perot voters really undermined, Bush or Clinton, and Nader voters could have had Gore as a second choice, letting them feel free to vote their conscience first. I'm sure there are also examples where this would have helped a Republican, too, of course. humanUser talk:Human 15:11, 7 December 2007 (EST)
(Get a room.)--Bobbing up 15:15, 7 December 2007 (EST)
It *might* have helped Dewey, actually, since Strom's supporters were particularly pissed at Truman for integrating the military. I'm also a fan of that, but it would require a complete restructuring of our system in each state. Though it might be possible to do in ONE state, but then almost every state ends up going for one person or another anyway. (What I mean is, even if a third party gets enough votes nationally to keep the winner in a plurality, the winner still gets the majority in each of the states they win, if I understand thing correctly. But I could be wrong; I've never studied the state vote breakdowns before.) Researcher 15:18, 7 December 2007 (EST)
Yes, pretty much. It results in someone eventually getting over 50% no matter how split up the votes are. As far as boosting 3rd (etc.) parties, it would let people vote Green or Libertarian (EG) first, and Dem or GOP second - signalling support for their ideal candidate without "throwing away their vote". Meaning we would see how many people really held those beliefs. I think the results might be surprising. As far as implementing IRV, yes, I think it would happen at the local/state "incubator" level first. Whether it would be used to eliminate the EC or not is another question, since that's in the darn constitution. I do believe there are some activist groups trying to instate IRV in some cities; and also there are other countries/lovalities using it. But that's off the top of my head, without researching what "I think I know", hehe. Like my dumbass thing about JFK/RMN. Which is why I yanked it ASAP from the EC article - I was the idiot who put it in there... humanUser talk:Human 15:24, 7 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Helios wuz here

As long as I'm here, I thought I'd drop by to say hi. ɧєɭıסş-get sunburn! 01:00, 10 December 2007 (EST)

Hiya Helios, yes, it's been a cloudy/snowy few days, so a little ray of sunshine is welcome ;) humanUser talk:Human 14:01, 10 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Chirpy?

what kind of slur is that? Bohdan 16:40, 11 December 2007 (EST)

Huh? Wha? How? Hi Bohdan! How have you been? humanUser talk:Human 17:16, 11 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Thanks, fella :)

Don't know if this is Assfly news to you or not, but I just had great fun reading this. --Robledo 18:00, 11 December 2007 (EST)

Haha, thanks, I think I had seen some of that before - somewhere on there Andy is busy trying to school a bunch of evil atheists on the origins of Devil's Mountain in Wyoming. (The Global Flood created it, of course!). It was hilarious to watch him flounder without editorial control over what other people can say. humanUser talk:Human 14:35, 12 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] sysop powers activate

Alright, so I apologized. Give me my sysop powers back and I will come make life more interesting at RW. HeartGoldSwarm like a hive 01:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)

So I saw, over at BobM's talk page. & he accepted, so the past is the past. Apparently, the mob wants to "vote" on it. My personal feeling (if I felt free to act on my own & ignore the mob) would be to say, "how about making life more interesting for a week or two first?" Someone suggested a 3 month probation on your talk page, which I think is absurd for a 6 month old wiki, but what I usually do is if I see a new, busy editor who seems to have the site's goals in their sights, I figure they might as well be a sysop so they can block vandals as well. And that usually only takes a week or two. I'll go paste something like this on the "vote" debate at your talk page...
By the way, I know you probably didn't mean it, but the wording of your request above is almost like an ultimatum. humanUser talk:Human 14:19, 12 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Well...

Thanks very much. I promise to use my powers for good and not evil. Is there a "so you're a sysop now" brochure I need to read or sump'n? PFoster 15:20, 12 December 2007 (EST)

I'm not sure if there's a concise set of advice anywhere. If there is, Susan probably wrote it and put it under "help". I was thinking as I just demoted you and Edgerunner76 that a "newsysop" template would be cool, and could link to a "sysop guidelines" article, if we wrote it. We'll see if I get any work done today, if I do I might try to create them. And, you're welcome! humanUser talk:Human 15:33, 12 December 2007 (EST)
I just emailed you something I had kept from a previous foray of trying to write something up along the lines of what you are talking about. I was going to slap it on my page, but decided it might engender too much extraneous talk. If it is of help, or could be, feel free to use it. --TK/MyTalk 18:48, 13 December 2007 (EST)
Thanks, yes, I got it. The sysop guide thing. It's interesting, I may try to steal some of it to make something for RW. Of course, it will get vandalized edited mercilessly, but it would be nice to have for new sysops to check out. Explanation of their new buttons, etc. humanUser talk:Human 19:39, 13 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Chances of being a sysop...

Exponentials aren't a nice enough way to express your chances. Rather than 999, how about 999. Look up tetration. Thats a big number. --Shagie 17:35, 13 December 2007 (EST)

Wow, yeah, that is a big number! Did you ever follow the annual MIT "biggest number on a blackboard" competition? Of course, they end up using words, not "digits", and set theory and other weird stuff. By the way, you don't need the "small" tag, "sup"s are automatically smaller. humanUser talk:Human 18:19, 13 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Hey

I know what you said, but I amn't really bothered with an encyclopedic entry on Libertarianism. I love satire. The article on Libertarianism is just silly looking. RW isn't an encyclopedia, so why would I write one? I think someone should write a satirical entry... but not one that merely misrepresents it and comes out with a ream of cliches... Hope I've made things clearer, and sorry if I offended you at all. MarcusCicero 18:47, 13 December 2007 (EST)

No offense taken... the tough thing is that we don't really do "pure" satire - we are trying to actually cover things, although with our POV (the one ont he main page), and, with our seemingly endless need to make at least ourselves laugh. Pure satire belongs on uncyclopedia, I think. Or I bet liberapedia would love a good satire of libertarianism. So, is that the only article here that you've read, or just the only one you think is "silly looking"? After all, this is a wiki, and everything is a work in progress. Maybe no one wants to work on that article on this particular day when you request us to rewrite it? humanUser talk:Human 19:43, 13 December 2007 (EST)
I like the way this place is a pisstake - I've been lurking around for a while now and have read a few articles. MarcusCicero 08:55, 16 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] sock

Stop hand.png

I have tagged you for puppetry. You are not allowed to edit or remove the tag until the situation is cleared up. Thank you. Bohdan 19:42, 13 December 2007 (EST)

Why, how delightful. Who or what was the sockpuppet I am suspected of running? humanUser talk:Human 19:44, 13 December 2007 (EST)
User:Tmtoulouse and User:AmesG. They have also been warned. Bohdan 19:45, 13 December 2007 (EST)
Which one of us is "real" do you think? humanUser talk:Human 19:55, 13 December 2007 (EST)
Well, obviously not User:Tmtoulouse. He has no personality. Obviously a sock. I'm guessing your a sock of AmesG. Bohdan 19:56, 13 December 2007 (EST)
Hmmm, but how you be sure? I often wear the same socks for several days in a row, you know. And I run four socks on RW, none smelly. humanUser talk:Human 19:59, 13 December 2007 (EST)
Thats the point of the tagging. Now the investigation starts. Bohdan 20:03, 13 December 2007 (EST)
Good luck with that, since we disabled checkuser. Do you need to subpwna my tapes? humanUser talk:Human 20:04, 13 December 2007 (EST)
This will all be done Holistically Bohdan 20:09, 13 December 2007 (EST)
Ah, that's a relief! humanUser talk:Human 20:11, 13 December 2007 (EST)
No way these people are socks! --Cheers,Ryanǂ wuz here ǂ 01:36, 14 December 2007 (EST)
Chunky hunks of meat yuncks, maybe? humanUser talk:Human 02:09, 14 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] I pester you because you're the only user here I'm familiar with

Commence pestering:

Look! New template!



Warning: This page may contain blasphemy.
You can help it by burning in Hades.
 --My cat is smarter than Andrew Schafly RA harass stalk 00:51, 14 December 2007 (EST)
Well, gee, thank you :) (I think) humanUser talk:Human 02:07, 14 December 2007 (EST)
Easily stolen from uncyclopedia [2] — Unsigned, by: Elassint / talk / contribs
Ah, correct, young grasshopper, but, who was that made it on Uncyclopedia in the first place? Moi! And whose genius was it to bring it over here? Moi! --My cat is smarter than Andrew Schafly RA harass stalk 05:40, 15 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Crazy Constitution thingy

I finished my commentary...what the heck should we title it, and what namespace does it go in? Researcher 16:37, 14 December 2007 (EST)

Well, first, I think the mainspace would be fine. However, if there's a lot of first person voice in it from you, or if you don't want it mercilessly "improved", then it should go in essay. As far as a title... do we know the name of the "group" that made this thing up? As an essay, it could just be "Constitutional lunacy" or something. Hmm, that would work in main, too, I guess. "Alternative consitution for an alternative universe" is a bit long... the lunacy one is easy to remember and might actually get linked once in a while. Give me a link when you put it up, will ya? humanUser talk:Human 16:51, 14 December 2007 (EST)
By the way, my first reaction was that "Crazy Constitution thingy" was a pretty good title... humanUser talk:Human 16:52, 14 December 2007 (EST)
Went with the actual title of the piece Constitution of the New America. It's in mainspace, and people can edit it. (If I feel the edits get crazy, I can always put another version in essay later, right?) Researcher 16:57, 14 December 2007 (EST)
'Twas made by the Liberty Guard of New America. Which is in no way affiliated with Ron Paul for President, in case you thought "Gee, these guys sound a lot like Ron Paul's loony supporters" :) --My cat is smarter than Andrew Schafly RA harass stalk 05:44, 15 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Human's gone! Everyone try him in absentia!

Oooh, me first! He's... smelly!-αmεσ (spy) 01:30, 15 December 2007 (EST)

Bitch is guilty! To the crushing fields!-- Offeep 01:31, 15 December 2007 (EST)
He's a sexist, egotistical, lying, hypocritical bigot. Stile4aly 01:32, 15 December 2007 (EST)

Move to desysop?-αmεσ (spy) 01:35, 15 December 2007 (EST)

Second!-αmεσ (spy) 01:35, 15 December 2007 (EST)

HERETICAL DISCUSSION CENSORED BY TEH CABAL.-αmεσ (spy) 01:36, 15 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] I've desysoped you

To appease Bohdan. Since you still have your other skillz feel free to reverse. I seem to have left you bureaucrat privileges, though. I wonder why.-αmεσ (spy) 18:51, 16 December 2007 (EST)

Ha Ha! Yes, justice is served! Bohdan 18:54, 16 December 2007 (EST)
Service is just Ed! humanUser talk:Human 19:06, 16 December 2007 (EST)

What! How did you manage to resysop yourself! It's impossible! Impossible I say!-αmεσ (spy) 19:08, 16 December 2007 (EST)

How can he do that when he's still a bureaucrat? Impossible, I agree. --Cheers,Ryanǂ wuz here ǂ 01:36, 17 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] defend the human race

Hey someone (probably truthist, although he's not logging in) keeps posting that junk about our reptilian overlords on the main talk page. I rolled it back twice but it keeps magically reappearing. Any chance you can use your sysop powers to, like, vaporize him or something cool like that? --BillOhannity 21:41, 16 December 2007 (EST)

YOU CAN NEVER CENSOR OR DEFEAT THE TRUTH, IT WILL ALWAYS BE THERE!
Yeah, I just removed 80k of raving spam from talk:main. Twits... we should add a link to that site from one of our crank or PS articles, though, to get them some hits and reknown! * humanUser talk:Human 22:24, 16 December 2007 (EST)
*Methinks that'd be playing into his hands.**Susanpurrrrr ... 22:48, 16 December 2007 (EST)
Thanks for deleting the tripe - too big for my editor.Susanpurrrrr ... 22:29, 16 December 2007 (EST)
Man, yeah, that crap gets old fast. I blocked the IP who last added it for 3 days, but that might not be much help. humanUser talk:Human
**But the site is hilarious! We just don't want to freakin' host it for them. It's a classic, along with cubic zirconian time and that silly constitution for a dumber america. humanUser talk:Human 22:51, 16 December 2007 (EST)
I could take on that task again. I find it fun and soothing to read and snark stupidity. But I'll leave it to the collective will of the mob. Researcher 20:08, 17 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] i like cake

Cake is goooooooooood!Insert non-formatted text here

[edit] You beat me to the punch -

All day long I been thinkin' "How come I gets to be a sysop and Researcher don't? He busts his ass around here. I should tell one of the muckity-mucks to get off their ass and do somethin' 'bout that..." Good call. PFoster 17:49, 20 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks, and I hope he doesn't mind. I think anyone who works as hard as he does should have blocking powers to make vandalism cleanup easier. I know I really appreciate virtually never having to do it, all I ever see is the trail of rollbacks. humanUser talk:Human 17:55, 20 December 2007 (EST)
I don't mind at all. There have been a (very) few times I've wanted it to deal with some vandal or other because it didn't seem anyone else was on. Thank you very much. Researcher 18:33, 20 December 2007 (EST)
You are most welcome. humanUser talk:Human 18:41, 20 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] edits

er, I just discovered I've carved this turkey over 12,500 or so times... dang. humanUser talk:Human 22:59, 20 December 2007 (EST)

out of "109,886 page edits since RationalWiki was setup". humanUser talk:Human 23:00, 20 December 2007 (EST)
Dayum. Get a hobby. ΓδλεσςΛιβεραλ 13:08, 21 December 2007 (EST)
Apparently, this is my hobby. maybe I need to get a life... humanUser talk:Human 15:09, 21 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Redirect

Since a certain redirect to Idaho was debatable, I redirected it to you. I hope you appreciate this more than Bohdan did. --Wandalise me Bohdan! RA talk stalkOver 145 edits! 23:11, 20 December 2007 (EST)

Haha, I'll consider myself tagged... thanks. I suppose it's my job to pick the next victim of the redirect? Hey, by the way, have you considered putting all that code that makes your sig in a file like User:Radioactive_afikomen/sig and then putting {{User:Radioactive_afikomen/sig}} in your prefs as your sig? It would save talk page acreage, is all. humanUser talk:Human 15:08, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Testing, 1, 2, 3; testing, 1, 2, 3. --Wandalise me Bohdan! RA talk stalkOver 145 edits! 15:34, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Hmm, that still pasted in the five line version. humanUser talk:Human 15:36, 21 December 2007 (EST)
I'm afraid it isn't working. And before your suggestion I was doing what I did on Wikipedia and Uncyclopedia: I had {{SUBST:nosubst|User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}} in my preferences box. It works over there, but not here. And given that your suggestion didn't work either, I'd say it's RationalWiki itself that the problem here. --Wandalise me Bohdan! RA talk stalkOver 145 edits! 15:39, 21 December 2007 (EST)
I am using {{SUBST:User:Human/sig}}, you might need to get rid of the "nosubst|" part? Hmmm, let me think. (or was that just a way to display it here?) That would actually put everything that is in the subfile on the talk page. Maybe just {{user:blah/sig}} would do it? The trick is to get the template/transclusion thing to be all that goes on the talk page. Also, maybe we don't have whatever the "nosubst" thing is installed? Oh well, thanks for trying! I'll see if I can figure it out. humanUser talk:Human 15:45, 21 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Ha.

I'm more socialist than you are. --Linus(plot evil tech) 15:19, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Wanna share your excess socialism with me so we can be more equal? humanUser talk:Human 15:21, 21 December 2007 (EST)
No, Jews just make other people share, they don't do it themselves. Oh wait, now I've given it away, doggone it. --Linus(plot evil tech) 16:39, 21 December 2007 (EST)
I thought Jews were all communist kibbutzniks? Are you one of those anti-Semitic Jews I've heard about? humanUser talk:Human 20:46, 21 December 2007 (EST)
I think you missed the joke. Or I did. --Linus(plot evil tech) 17:57, 22 December 2007 (EST)
No, no, no, that's only Israeli Jews. American Jews are soul-sucking capitalists. --Wandalise me Bohdan! RA talk stalkOver 270 edits! 18:02, 22 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Will the real....

Which Elassint retired? The real one, or the wandal? And if the real one did, why?--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 16:32, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Elassint runs scores, if not hundreds, of socks on here. And uses several IPs. he has gotten into arguments and edit wars with himself. Who knows which of them this was? And if it was wandalism, E can fix it as one of his multiple parasites personas. humanUser talk:Human 16:33, 21 December 2007 (EST)
Oh, and if he is pretending to retire, it might be over the revert war at New World Order. humanUser talk:Human 16:35, 21 December 2007 (EST)
He has the weirdest sense of humor anyway. So who knows? I hope not, because E has been really helpful in the past. Researcher 16:37, 21 December 2007 (EST)
Dat's koo-koo!--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 16:37, 21 December 2007 (EST)
Yah, E. is weird, but strangely funny. You'll see E running around, wandalizing as three people & an IP, and making "strange" arguments about shirs pet topics, in the middle of reverting real outside wandalism. Of course, sometimes the wandalisms E. reverts a string of were almost certainly done by one of the parasites. humanUser talk:Human 16:42, 21 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] BTW

Care for a blog at RationalBlogs? <ignore>PalMD seems to be on vacation,</ignore> so I need other beta testers. --Linus(plot evil tech) 16:47, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Hmmm, thanks, but not really right now... RationalWiki is my blog, darn it! If I think of something I would rather put on a blog though, I'll let you know. The blogs could theoretically replace the "essay" space, couldn't they? humanUser talk:Human 20:44, 21 December 2007 (EST)
I don't think that's a wise direction to take RationalWiki, Human. Wikis are by their nature more accessible, and encourage more participation, than blogs. --Wandalise me Bohdan! RA talk stalkOver 160 edits! 20:50, 21 December 2007 (EST)
It's not a "direction" I am proposing, just an observation. If I had something I wanted to write and have people comment on here, I'd probably use the essay space. Leaving what purpose for an RW blog? I agree, it's too splintering - recent changes (or to a lesser extent, a watchlist) keep one up with everything on the wiki. I guess one would have to bookmark a blog, or sign up for a feed from it, or something? humanUser talk:Human 20:59, 21 December 2007 (EST)

[edit] Hola!

Just stopping by and saying hi. Love what you've done with the place, it's quite shiny and official-looking. --Hojini hao 21:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey Hoji! I don't think I dusted or polished anything, I prefer what we call "patina" in the antiques trade... what 50s housewives called "grime". Hope you are well! ħumanUser talk:Human 02:21, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Hoji, eh...I am still pissed at you for not replying to that email I sent you 2 years ago. I replied to you but you never emailed back. I am gonna hold that shit until I die. AceModerator 02:33, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
He was busy colleging and American footballing. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:35, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Ace was busy sheepfucking. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 02:45, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes I was...assuming "sheepfucking" is American for snorting meth and enjoying life. AceModerator 03:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
If by "sorting meth and enjoying life" you mean sheepfucking, then yes, snorting meth and enjoying life is NZ for sheepfucking. Lord of Reckless Noise Hooray! I'm helping! 03:16, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Swirlysparkly.gif
Oh my god those colors blew my mind. --Hojini hao 20:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 :) Nice to see you sticking around... wanna join the seekrit kabal? (I have to spell it funny to hide it from the mean people) ħumanUser talk:Human 02:21, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Is there juicy gossip and pillow fights? If so, then of course. --Hojini hao 04:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Absolutely, of course, what did you expect? That and 8 quart jugs of Goat Pilaf! ħumanUser talk:Human 01:30, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Bullying

I won't stand for your bullying any longer. You are on notice. AceModerator 02:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

I noticed. Did you bring more beer than you can consume? Otherwise I'm not listening. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:42, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
does it have to be good beer?--il'Dictator Mikal 02:43, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Some issues with Ray Comfort articles

While randomly cleaning up the Discovery Institute article yesterday, I found a problem with something Feredir added. I then turned my attention back to a list of his articles I'd been meaning to go through and noticed that he is responsible for ginormous walls of text, just absolutely massive amounts that work out to comprise the bulk of our largest articles. These include some of the articles that Google ranks highly that you and I have discussed. So I was looking at the 4th longest article on the wiki and found a few more problems. I'm exquisitely sensitive to the possibility of getting this kind of thing wrong and I'd be mortified about saying the wrong thing. I'd appreciate your input and counsel. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 02:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

I was just reading that comment, yes. I think we should just proactively userfy those "book reviews" and leave it at that. Will that hide them from Google? If not, deletion is the solution to pollution.
Your hope that he will address the question is not going to be satisfied, from what I've seen, he only replies to high compliments. And never copyedits his awful first drafts.
I say terminate with extreme prejudice. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:31, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
I remember trying to edit some of those reviews into shape a year or so ago. They're uniformly horrible and, since they're mostly a one-person vanity project, should go in user/essay space at best. Theory of Practice "I never set out to hit anybody. It's just that a lot of people got hit." -- Andy Roberts 02:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Actually, what he does is whine, and say "then I'll take my ball elsewhere", threatening to make some new anti-Comfort wiki type thing. I don't know of your discussions with The Nut, but in my own view, we need quality articles on these books, cause Comfort, along with DI, and AIG, and whoever is the new kid on the block, need to be refuted. I've never personally been convinced this particular person is really doing a RW worthy job. But I'm one of the No CP bangers, so what do I know.--Green mowse.pngGodot 02:36, 13 May 2012 (UTC) (EC)
I hope I'm not getting this wrong. If I'm not, I think just found 13+k of plagiarism in a single article. I'm not userifying that. I'm deleting it. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 02:37, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
He's like Maratrean. Search for any string from these essays and you'll find it on 4+ sites. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 02:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Are you going to leave the redirects where they are? And what about the other things that he has written (i.e. those youtuber articles)? Peter with added ‼Science‼ 03:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
See what I just did at Evolution: A Fairy Tale for Grownups - this ain't rocket science, it's cleaning up a bunch of crap. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:26, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Template: Rated

Don't forget to remove the relevant code from all these linked pages after you've kiboshed the template. Theory of Practice "I never set out to hit anybody. It's just that a lot of people got hit." -- Andy Roberts 02:34, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

I'll delete them as I run into them. Or maybe someone who likes to do useless shit can write a robot to do it? ħumanUser talk:Human 02:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

[edit] We have voted, and our say is final!!!!

And by "we," I mean me. I have voted and decided that you might enjoy this fine piece of music. Enjoy! Lord of Reckless Noise Hooray! I'm helping! 13:26, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Great song, but so overshadowed by the single that follows in on the American Green Album... [3]. Thanks! ħumanUser talk:Human 03:06, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
True that. Oh well, both are excellent songs just the same. Lord of Reckless Noise Hooray! I'm helping! 08:56, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Sometimes the bastardised US releases are so much better than their UK counterparts. So many good songs on that record. Utterly groundbreaking - I still remember the day I bought it. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:58, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Fun:Delicious

If no one else votes, your vote can save that page. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 02:33, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

I appreciate the heads up. That was very "old school doing it right" of you. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:49, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Hi!

What's up? I'm out of school for the summer which means I have more time to play on here! Yay! I see this place has changed a lot though. Doesn't look like you guys have as much fun :( Alyssa Bryant (talk) 17:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Yay to have you back around for a while. Yeah, some things have been less fun lately, but nevermind that. Host a party on your talk page! Thanks for looking me up and saying "Hi!" ħumanUser talk:Human 01:33, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Rules

RULES AceModerator 04:38, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


Lol,

RULES ħumanUser talk:Human 04:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

ROOLZ04:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit] I think Human is a pretty cool guy

He doesn't afraid of anything. AceModerator 04:59, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Would you like to subscribe to my newsletter? ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 01:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Dude

Why don't you give it a rest for now - and stick up a vote detailing how goddamned ugly it looks with those hideous fucking links? (And Brx, don't fucking get involved here - you'll just be stirring shit you little prick...) AceModerator 03:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Goodpost.gif Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 03:07, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
A vote? A vote? Are you serious? Let's just discuss it. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:20, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
It has already been discussed, and most people seemed to oppose the changes you advocate. As you are still unsatisfied, there is no consensus and the next step is a vote. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 03:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
I am having trouble finding this alleged "discussion". Why do you not provide links to back up your assertions? ħumanUser talk:Human 03:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
This section and those below it are devoted to the discussion in question--"Shut up, Brx." 03:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
That is the discussion I meant. I did not think I needed to reference it, seeing as how we both participated in it. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 03:59, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Exactly because edit warring is getting nowhere. I would vote for your option Human. AceModerator 03:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Discussion is how we decide. "!Voting" is how the authoritarians decide - and see who their enemies are. Jesus fucking Christ on an Easter stick, has no one here heard of the "secret ballot"? "Voting" in public is not voting. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
It sometimes happens that a decision cannot be reached by consensus through discussion. That is why we have votes. Also, it is just as easy for "authoritarians" to gauge a person's "enemy" status from their arguments in a public discussion as from their ballot in a public vote. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 04:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
So if we can't work it out, the authoritarians call a public !vote? You are an idiot. Discussion is discussion, and anyone can play "devil's advocate" in such. Public voting is so wrong it's not even funny. Those of you who don't get that are a few centuries, if not millennia, behind the times. PS, Ace was just joking. ħumanUser talk:Human 04:37, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Cheers Human

I read your comments in the coop. I'm touched, deeply touched. I'm five chapters into my George R.R. Martin inspired novel (A satire of RW). Unsurprisingly, you will play a major role in it. This most recent episode has thankfully helped get me over a nasty period of writer's block.

I haven't left. They may have banned me but I will always be hear. The voice of liberty can only be silenced by tyranny - never extinguished. So long as my ideas survive, so will I. You must carry the torch and fight the cockroaches to the last inch of your being. Never give up. Never surrender. Don't leave. Make them ban you. become a martyr. The more martyrs they create, the more powerful our movement will become. The aspies may have created this bureaucracy, but in time we will rise up and crush the rotten superstructure they have created.

I believe Foster the Cruel can amend his past evil ways. I don't believe him to be the root of all problems here. No, it is to the Sophist we must draw our ire, and challenge at all costs. He argues well and it is difficult to challenge him. But he has a fatal weakness. He is incredibly arrogant. We must prick him of his pomposity. We must crush him.

So much is tied up within you Human. The revolution MUST succeed! — Unsigned, by: 83.71.30.111 / talk / contribs 18:07, 07 June 2012 (UTC)

You terrify us!!! That novel of yours (if you find a publisher) will just get more publicity for RatWiki. Proxima Centauri (talk) 18:27, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

At least he can write a sentence with dependent clauses. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

If you're lucky all of ten people will start to read your novel and get halfway through the first chapter before giving up through boredom. Proxima Centauri (talk) 18:51, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

More hate? I'd like to read his novel, hell, if he emails me a draft I'll copyedit it for free. And enjoy it, unlike copyediting your work, which I do for free and in agony at your mutilation of the Queen's tongue. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
I would like to read it myself. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 04:19, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
As would I. MarcusCicero is the grandest foil to the new authoritarians we have. He's also one of us. Someone who injects himself deeply into all this bullshit, both to stir it and come through as a savior. Someone you know. He may be a moderator. Maybe he's a respected truth teller. He may be a provocateur. I trust him implicitly, as I trust all the moderators to execute their duty consistent with their job description. Hail MarcusCicero!Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 05:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

MarcusCicero is the grandest foil tinfoil to the new authoritarians we have. Proxima Centauri (talk) 06:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Lol, PC tried to make a joke! Sad that it was epic fail. Why do you hate MC, exactly, PC? In words, hopefully in sentences? ħumanUser talk:Human 04:33, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Nom Nom Nom

Nominated you for mod. AceModerator 04:41, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, sir, can I have another? ħumanUser talk:Human 02:40, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Vote Ace

File:Acemodlove.jpg
Vote Ace..for sexy times

AceModerator 02:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Can't we just go for a romantic drive? ħumanUser talk:Human 02:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Anything you say baby. AceModerator 02:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Not a Troll

Just thought I'd let you know. My aim is certainly not to start an argument. I'm sorry for not thinking the article is particularly great, you must have spent a lot of time on it? Don't take it so personally. - BON

Nobody amongst our neurotics bothered to sig that? ħumanUser talk:Human 07:05, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Ignore Human. Thats what everyone else does. --Revolverman (talk) 05:45, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Cool meme. Who are you again? Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 06:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Wait a second, I thought I was face man today? AceThe Rep Grows Bigger 06:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Keeping up with all the gratuitous shots against Human takes a village. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 06:29, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Nutty, that was well put. ħumanUser talk:Human 07:05, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQlI70PiyTg

[edit] Cabal

There is no cabal. And a late beware the ides of July to ye, sir. sterilesporadic heavy hitter 12:21, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

We were all just emailing about this. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 14:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
It was hot, nothing worse, but thanks! ħumanUser talk:Human 02:38, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
There was no cabal. Not back then, anyway. DogP (talk) 23:31, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Moderator

Ace McWicked has stepped down, so you are now a moderator again. WeaseloidWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 06:41, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

What does that mean, in terms of awesome powerz and debilitating responsibility? Is there an instruction manual? ħumanUser talk:Human 00:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
There's this. WëäŝëïöïďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 06:37, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. ħumanUser talk:Human 19:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Ancient Aliens

You, like me, enjoy a good episode of Ancient Aliens. Georgio, what a guy. this take down is pretty good. Acei9 09:11, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Nice, thanks! ħumanUser talk:Human 08:41, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
The second hour is perhaps even better than the first. I hope this wound up as an EL in a few places here? Or is that my job? ħumanUser talk:Human 05:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Vermont Secession

Greetings! (If you've ever received a draft notice, I know I've gotten your attention.) I recently found RW and am trying to add what meager knowledge I'm afflicted with about all things secessionist. I have a blog about the Vermont secesher movement here.

I was pawing through the Alaskan Independence Party article today and found an edit of yours from more than 4 years ago that reads, "No one panics when Vermont considers secession every few weeks, after all." It's a bit of snark that I'd like to reword so that it doesn't feed the meme that there's actually a meaningful movement here. The number of people that could be called secessionist activists in Vermont number somewhere under 50. They refer to themselves as a "small community." What about a half a dozen of them have been somewhat successful in doing is promoting the illusion to the out of state media that Vermonters get up in the morning and ask themselves, "How can I advance the cause of secession today?"

I've started an article about the Second Vermont Republic that may give you a sense of where I'm headed but it's by no means near finished.

Thanks, T.

ThomasRowley (talk) 22:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, fascinating! I hope you linked to it from Vermont at the very least. ħumanUser talk:Human 07:54, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
I intend to when I get the 2012 election data into SVR; the Vermont article will get a part on Vermont fringe candidates that come and go.
Enjoy, T.
ThomasRowley (talk) 13:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

[edit] For old times sake

U.S. Presidential Election has already ended. (refresh) steriletalk 01:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Nice work! Brings a tear to my eye. Vive les gut olde daze! ħumanUser talk:Human 06:43, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Nomination

You have been nominated to the 2013 Board of Trustees. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 21:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. I will now go register to vote... Oh, and I guess I should accept the nomination, right? ħumanUser talk:Human 01:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Hey buddy

Been awhile - how are ya? Acei9 03:10, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

OK thanks. It might be time to sue Kendoll, though. ħumanUser talk:Human 06:12, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Oh yeah, why's that? Acei9 06:51, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
My raging paranoia over why Norton/Semantec keeps messing with access to my business' website. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
As long as you understand who you are dealing with. I hear he once won a spelling bee. Acei9 04:14, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Clever insects make great pets. Redchuck.gif ГенгисYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.Moderator 08:44, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Better than winning a smartalec stick-insect. Acei9 19:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
You people are the greatest. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:07, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Putin

Human,

I have noticed that someone has removed your picture of Putin from the Putin page. Someone else then put it back - but removed it again!

Can you please put the picture back and fight for it if necessary? (I don't yet have the right)

ThanksZara Thustra (talk) 20:42, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Seems to be all better now. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Heh

Well that only took about a year... Acei9 01:26, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Hey buddy

Since you're back, should we edit war over Gaia hypothesis again, just for old times' sake? Goddamn, it seems like only yesterday we were butting heads and throwing down over that thing. And almost nobody has touched it since! Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 09:44, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Like I said

There is good stuff in that article but it's not well written. My own writing is way too dense with sentences that are way too long. Some of what I and others wrote is still incomprehensible. It is cringe-inducingly humiliating to me that we've yet to reply to CMI directly responding to our responses. I wanted to take a run at tuning up the main article before jumping into replying to the responses since it comes up so high on google and still isn't. It should be a flagship article

Thanks for looking at the article. Ghostface Editah (talk) 03:54, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Which article? ħumanUser talk:Human 03:46, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Transphobia issues

You might want to brush up on some of the current issues in the trans community. The writers you deleted articles about are generally known within the community for being fiercely anti-trans, and Cathy Brennan's antics of recently have bordered on criminal harrassment in a couple of cases. It's probably safe to say that a few of the articles (particularly Germaine Greer's) really are deficient, but I don't think deleting the transphobia parts is the answer. EVDebs (talk) 08:31, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I agree. But it seemed like someone was on an equally hateful mission. A one-issue mission. "Fiercely anti-trans" I do not think I found, which is why I deleted the garbage. I suppose the very usage of the phrase "tranny" is like calling them "queer"?
The series of edits and the template disgusted me. ħumanUser talk:Human 07:05, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] What you escaped from …

… all those years ago: Welsh valleys misery. Scream!! (talk) 08:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

I dunno, it was very pretty in 1968. The mountains, the lunch in the satchels. Not sure being as confused as hell in the US educational system was a good thing. But here I am, buying, making, and selling at a "profit". It's ok, but I hate the climate here. Perhaps one day I will go home? ħumanUser talk:Human 03:29, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

[edit] It's nice...

...to feel like I am part of this place again. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:23, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Good to see you about these parts again, old pal. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 07:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
It certainly feels a bit more like the old days with you around; you don't know me from a bar of soap, but it's good to see you a bit more active. Tielec01 (talk) 08:13, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks both of you, old friends and new. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Good to see you around. Srsly. TofP aka P-Foster aka PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.Moderator 04:17, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Psycho killer, fa-fa-fa-fa-fafa-fa-fa. ħumanUser talk:Human 04:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Good to see ya Huh. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 00:16, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
 :) nice to see you too, you small sneaky mammal... ħumanUser talk:Human 04:13, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Human is best human. Icewedge (talk) 08:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Wholly schitt, Monsieur Wedge! Waves of nostalgia. How have you been, my friend? You must be almost ready for grad school by now! ħumanUser talk:Human 01:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm totally late to the party, but while I was lurking RW I definitely found you to be one of the more fun editors. This community always seemed quite fun to me because of folks like you. - GrantC (talk) 04:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Well, damn, Grant, that's a nice comment to come across late on a Sunday evening. Thank you. ħumanUser talk:Human 04:24, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
No problem at all! :) - GrantC (talk) 05:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Mallard Fillmore

Someone made a parody. Star of David.png Radioactive Misanthrope 04:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Cool, thanks! I am sure you are familiar with my long ago efforts to call Tinsley and his lying on the carpet? Hell, that was before RW, before blogs, before wikis... [4] Now to enjoy the parody! ħumanUser talk:Human 04:19, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Another Poem

Since you are something of a fan I thought you might like this as well. I put it up in the poetry section but it was taken down as not being a Rational Wiki thing. What do you say? Does it have goat? Sesquihypercerebral (talk) 18:35, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


Viper as ace don.

(see paranoid C.V. )


A sad pre-novice.

I can so deprave.

A ponce advisor.

Vices on parade.


Cadarvers opine.

Read vain scope.

Ape's darn voice

is a craven dope.


Sane recap void.

One vapid scare.

Novice arse pad.

A coven. Despair.

Lol, a series of anagrams. It ain't exactly haiku, but it is nicely arranged. Not sure if I'd call it true pottery though. Hard to tell. Did the fascists kill it it? Tell them I said "hi". They hate me. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:40, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Well if it's haiku you want how about


A Mr. A. Nag,

raga man, ran a mag, man!

A rag, Rama Nag.


I was thinking of sticking the first poem on a particular talk page but if I did that it would give away the punch line. Have you got it yet? Sesquihypercerebral (talk) 13:22, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

You probably don't mean "Cadaver Ponies". Still searching. Love your username, by the way. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Or "Paradise Coven". Wow, that set of letters anagrams really well. No, I don't get the underlying theme, please enlighten me! ħumanUser talk:Human 00:57, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Oh well I think you have had long enough now so put your slippers on in case you want to kick yourself. All the lines are anagrams of "Conservapedia". Sesquihypercerebral (talk) 10:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Fight the power

Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 13:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Cool. I think Fear of a Black Planet was my first rap CD, what an awesome effort. Either that or Ice Tea and Freedom of Speech... Just Watch What You Say. Most excellent. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:32, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

[edit] head's up

Someone's thinking of deleting your creation: Fun:Experimental control. A man's entilted to a fightin' chance.Civic CatTalk to Civic Cat 18:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. What a weird article. Deeply hilarious, though. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

[edit] HUMAN!!!!!!!

Cheers from Minnesota country!!!


Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 09:42, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Cheers, thank you! ħumanUser talk:Human 06:59, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Yes. Science and how it matters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jod7v-m573k ħumanUser talk:Human 05:03, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Teflon wiki

Hi Human. : -) For some reason an IP editor has decided to vandalise your archive there. It's not a problem, just thought you might like to know. Cheers. --Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 18:56, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

[edit] I'm sorry

About our argument a few days ago in the saloon bar. I realized later that I was thinking you had said things that you simply didn't. That was my own fear talking. I'm sorry. Wehpudicabok [話] [変] [留] 07:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

No blood, no foul. I respect (and accept - meaning the issue is closed) your apology, and the coolness it takes to do such a thing. Thanks. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:54, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

[edit] A wonderful gift headed your way

I'm sending you a bottle of Tomatin. Please enjoy it with my compliments, buddy. Cheers! Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 09:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Aw, as we have shared, you didn'tneedto do that. But I will appreciate every drop! ħumanUser talk:Human 05:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Did you just invoke the Law of appreciation ;-) Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 09:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Hahahaha! ħumanUser talk:Human 01:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Damn, that was some wonderfully complex stuff! ħumanUser talk:Human 10:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Lockman

Something should link to that article you wrote. Any ideas? TeenageWasteland (talk) 04:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Tea Party, Homophobia, Tax deniers, ... ħumanUser talk:Human 05:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Local politicians with a hateful axe to grind. I dunno. I added cat:bigots, lets fill it up. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:04, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Maine, Maine politics. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:05, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Don't let me stop you, then. The article should probably say something about the Tea Party and the tax denialism. TeenageWasteland (talk) 05:05, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
It is what it is so far. A quick start. You aren't stopping anything. You can help make it and the site better too. Not sure you know this but I've been around here for a couple years. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
That's nice. TeenageWasteland (talk) 05:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes, isn't it. Glad I've got new members like yourself to show me the ropes. ħumanUser talk:Human 10:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Seeds of Death

I moved it back to article space. Because it is an article. You whined about the first person material. So I took it out. It took about 12 minutes. You could have done the same. It would have been far more useful. TeenageWasteland (talk) 14:52, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

It's still an AWFUL article. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:50, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
My moving it to essay space was far more useful than your moving it back. But what do I know since I am obviously a noob in need of your schooling. I will learn, I promise. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
You're not a n00b, just bitter and useless. At this point you're less helpful than McWicked, which is saying something. --Gnillort (talk) 06:43, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
And who are you, Gnillort? And really, hiding behind a sock account? 75.72.230.174 (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
I lolled at "bitter and useless". Who are you? Oh I see, nobody, who has done nothing. Fuck off. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:00, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Banking crisis

Human, the Banking crisis is a travesty of crap. Makes RW look irrational and ignorant. It was written by british socialists with a hard on against maggie thatcher without a clue of US law, politics, or regulatory environment. Here's useful material, but the damn commies won't let me edit the page.

What the fuck's happened to RW? it's gotten like WP with the thought police. what a pity. nobsJesus loves you and I love you, but nobody else does. 21:31, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Copyvio claims

Like this one [5] -- is there a noticeboard or somesuch where they're dealt with? --MtDNotorious Sodomite 05:27, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

The talkpage of the photo in question is an ideal starting place, followed, perhaps, by a quick blurb about it in the Saloon Bar to draw attention to the subject. Naturally, we should also demand that whomever is making the claim provide proof that they are the originator of the material. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 07:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
See my comment on the talk page. Scream!! (talk) 08:31, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Cheers muchly. I wasn't sure as we don't tend to be as centralised as other wikis. --MtDNotorious Sodomite 10:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
I see my work is done here. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Discouraging lawsuits

Tmtoulouse doesn't want to encourage people to sue us. Please don't suggest that he does. Proxima Centauri (talk) 17:25, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry, I only based that on five years of conversation with the man. ħumanUser talk:Human 04:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
RationalWiki has changed over the years, RationalWikians have matured. A great deal of what was written in previous years was deleted because it's, 'what we were'. One change is we're more concerned about preventing lawsuits. The Kent Hovind affair could benefit us because has focused us on the consequences of lawsuits and the need to be prepared. Proxima Centauri (talk) 10:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Verrrry interrrresting. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:37, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

[edit] If you could please tell Dr. Toulouse thank you for hosting my amateur encyclopedia writing.

I deeply appreciate that you have information here absent from Wikipedia, like the page for Fundamentalist Mormonism for example. I also really appreciate you'd accept the absence of any studies to be noted when the unexplored variables are painfully obvious even to laymen like myself. I only have one edit I felt were unnecessarily reverted, when I said the developmental speed of the primitive streak was likely connected, for the most part my stay here was without incident and I made a few improvements to the articles arguments.

I have but a small favor to ask, I would like for one of the higher ups at Rational wiki to vouch for me to the Wikipedia Arbcom, for what ever affect that may have. I felt my time was better spent here than editing Memory Alpha, even though the only reason I was blocked from Wikipedia was because of over categorizing fiction, it seems at times like none at Wikipedia even remember that I mostly edit non-fiction. I learned my lesson about adding hundreds of categories in a day and having to use printed sources for media studies still.

Well, that's about it. Thanks for doing all this for free, or I guess less than free in the case of whose paying to host this. My only regret here is that I never really got the house style of humor. Amateur Encyclopedist (talk) 23:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

[edit] What's your opinion on Exiled Encyclopedist's infestation of this wiki?

Based off what you say about your self, I'd say we have similar views on most issues (not on guns); but I would prefer hearing your opinion on my edits. I'm sorry if you get in trouble for anything I've said. I guess if your Human, than I'm Vampire. I'll be leaving now, the parts on religious views towards abortion are as valid to include in the stem cell research section as absolute heat is for the big bang. Beginnings can be as difficult as endings. Also why do you even have fiction pages at all if people can't cite them to make the devil and God look stupid using the arguments of Gene Roddenberry and the writers of the David Tennant's run as Doctor Who, do you want more or less talk of fiction? The devil is just an idea, and Kirk doesn't care about appearances, only actions.

On a much more serious note, could I get your assistance with Rape, Genetic Engineering and my edits to presidential slavery? I'm also having trouble with Ryulong in the chicken coop. They are about to ban me for having no use, despite being on most of the pages on this Wiki. Exiled Encyclopedist (talk) 00:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

[edit] A BoN has nominated you for the board

Hi Human,

Just thought I'd alert you to the fact that this BoN has nominated you for the board.

You have until January 26th to accept the nomination. ScepticWombat (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up, M. Wombat! ħumanUser talk:Human 21:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

[edit] The list may be kind of long

but it could be a hell of a lot longer. I also think we need more descriptions, I encourage that. Rabbitxhampster (talk) 04:57, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

? Lost a bit here... ħumanUser talk:Human 07:12, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

"Most members of the conventional press are, of course, cowardly minds. They almost universally buy the corporate spin (or the White House spin) and never ask any tough questions anymore. Some of the REAL heroes -- the people who are asking intelligent questions about our world -- include:

Do you see a pattern here? Each one of these individuals has been marginalized or viciously attacked and slandered simply because they chose to ask intelligent questions about the world around them. Now, I don't agree with every single thing said by each one of these people, but I admire each of them for having the courage to ask the questions that need to be asked if we are to move forward as a society (and civilization).

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032293_gullible_minds.html#ixzz1OrDc8VqJ" ħumanUser talk:Human 07:53, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

I was talking about something you said on my page, but wow. Isn't Andrew Wakefield a vaccine crank? Ron Paul, Alex Jones, I guess you're more of a libertarian-liberal than a standard liberal, huh? I'm not Obama's bitch either. Rabbitxhampster (talk) 04:57, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say Human's quoting that not for something he agrees with, but for...something. A list of people we need articles on? B/c I doubt that Human would respect almost anyone on that list. And besides Wakefield, Rense, Icke, and Jones, etc., the page that's coming from claims there's a cure for cancer. So to say that Human's posting that as something he agrees with means Human possibly the biggest deep-cover mole in internet history. ThunderkatzHo! 05:04, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Katz is correct, sorry for the unclarity! ħumanUser talk:Human 08:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
You said they were 'real heroes'. You were being satirical? Alright. Rabbitxhampster (talk) 05:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
That was inside he quote marks... ħumanUser talk:Human 09:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
...means Human possibly the biggest deep-cover mole in internet history. -- I don't know, after all, his name is "human". maybe he is a deep-cover mole. Wouldn't a mole use such a sapian term, vs, you know "Talpidae" or "blind rodent". I'm just saying.... :-) --Pink mowse.pngEn attendant Godot 20:03, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Adding:

Ian R. Crane ħumanUser talk:Human 17:46, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Frank Turek Author of I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist. ħumanUser talk:Human 11:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
[6] at 26 he breaks Godwin's law. Also I think we have refutations of every argument he makes on this site. He actually sounds like a version of Kendoll who can make his own breakfast. ħumanUser talk:Human 12:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
By 1:30 or so the religious apologist start really unraveling and Hitchens really hits his stride. I know this is a long watch, but I might try to piece together some sense on the red links I just created. ħumanUser talk:Human 13:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Chad "Atheist Killa" Elliott a/k/a AK. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:41, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Interesting... User_talk:Theatheistkilla (This user is blocked... in 24 hours). ħumanUser talk:Human 03:07, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Gabriel Cousens http://americanloons.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/588-gabriel-cousens.html ħumanUser talk:Human 02:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

[edit] From an email about the Texas biology textbook controversy

"The most recent review of biology textbooks was a particularly egregious process considering the people who were invited to participate. Here are just a few of the reviewers who are listed in the Creation Science Hall of Fame as “Darwin Skeptics”4:

  • Raymond Bohlin, a research fellow for an organization whose purpose is the promotion of “intelligent design” — a religious idea which seeks to cast doubt on evolution while circumventing the Supreme Court ruling that bars the teaching of “creation science” in public schools.5
  • Walter Bradley, who helped launch the "intelligent design” movement with a book he coauthored, titled The Mystery of Life's Origin.
  • Ide Trotter, a wealthy funder of anti-science organizations who has repeatedly participated in science textbook reviews advocating for the inclusion of scientifically discredited theories about the weaknesses of evolution."

[edit] more weirdness

Your Move with Andy Stanley, Andy Stanley, interesting character, seems to be addicted to porn, though. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Some greatness

Rachel Parent

http://beyondblindfold.com/14-year-old-teen-schools-ignorant-tv-host/

ħumanUser talk:Human 04:59, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

World-renowned theoretical physicist and science-communicator Professor Lawrence Krauss ħumanUser talk:Human 04:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Yay, he's already here! ħumanUser talk:Human 04:08, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

[edit] Wachadoodle fake drugs

Prosvent, a concoction to help prostate enlargement sufferers to avoid reality-based medicine. ħumanUser talk:Human 04:46, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome back

Nice to see you around these parts again Huw. €₳$£ΘĪÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 16:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, it's nice to be back... ħumanUser talk:Human 16:12, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
I second that motion, it's good to see you around these parts again. -Gabe John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt (talk) 19:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

[edit] Whoops

Dropped my mouse, and that didn't have a confirm. Narky SawtoothNarky.png (Floof!~) 00:01, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

?? ħumanUser talk:Human 01:14, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
I accidentally rollback'd one of your edits. Narky SawtoothNarky.png (Floof!~) 03:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Did you fix it? ħumanUser talk:Human 03:36, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
I fixed it immediately after it happened. Narky SawtoothNarky.png (Floof!~) 18:04, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

[edit] Wait, what?

Did it just delete that? Narky SawtoothNarky.png (Floof!~) 03:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

I dunno, I tried to roll it back. The talk page comment is pretty garish for a minor omission. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Do I need to remove the {{sign}} from the message and/or change the bot's colour scheme? Narky SawtoothNarky.png (Floof!~) 18:04, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
I dunno. Make it simple text (no colors etc.), and if you can't incorporate a "delete this section" button, have it say "feel free to remove this post from your talk page". The thing is, since the bot fixes the signing, there's not much to gain by telling the editor about it, except perhaps for noobs. ħumanUser talk:Human 19:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

[edit] You're a bot

Methinks the user doth protest too much. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 20:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

??? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Bored and trying to amuse myself at the expense of your username. It was funnier in my head. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 21:15, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Ah, that explains everything. ħumanUser talk:Human 23:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support