User talk:Inquisitor Ehrenstein

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Add new post

Rage deposite box
Deposite your rage and concerns here for prompt addressing without disrupting other areas of communication

Deposite rage here

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Inquisitor Ehrenstein!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

If you are interested in contributing, please read what our articles are intended to be.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

Picon small.pngAcer Blue 23:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Archive 1 LQT Archive

Contents

[edit] Generally

people like it if you atleast in some way archive the liquidthread when you remove it--MikallakiM 22:46, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Or at least put up this link. Peter mqzp 22:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Done. ఠ_ఠ Тод Зенос ан форфар фор 23:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
That's not much of an archive. There's no easy way to tell the most recent threads from the earliest. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 23:42, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
I doubt anyone's going to read it. The only reason why I care about users archiving their talk pages properly is because some of them are going to use clearing the page as a way of getting rid of warnings or block notices. ఠ_ఠ Тод Зенос ан форфар фор 01:57, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Is there really no way to properly archive Liquid threads? Or is IE just being a twat? DamoHi 03:14, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
There's what I did (listed by most recently edited and everything). Star of David.png Radioactive Misanthrope 03:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Good job with organizing that. Considering that no one's actually ever going to go back and read it, I don't really feel like taking the time to arrange it into a list. I can understand that people wouldn't want to lose massive (all) discussions if LQT were to go under, but for the most part, the loss of user talk page discussions wouldn't be much of a problem. ఠ_ఠ Тод Зенос ан форфар фор 04:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
You might want to take a closer look at how it was done. Peter mqzp 04:47, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Ok, thanks, that's a lot better. If it's done automatically than I can do it. ఠ_ఠ Тод Зенос ан форфар фор 04:59, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] What exactly is your problem?

First you make this weird, out-of-the-blue comment that I am unable to figure out the justification for, then you repeatedly remove my comment from my talk page, and then you drop a substantial block on me, i guess for undoing your unjustified removal of my comment. What the hell is wrong with you today? Inspiration Move me brightly. 15:12, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

You removed my comment. So it would have been better if I put it back. Sorry. Why did you remove my comment? ఠ_ఠ Inquisitor Ehrenstein 15:19, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Where did I remove your comment? Inspiration Move me brightly. 15:23, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Summary: You didn't (initially). Vox did (while nerfing the inquisitor's signature). Then the inquisitor tried to unpick that, but deleted your comment in the process. Hydrogen and Time (talk) 15:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Sign

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) Thank you. Inspiration Move me brightly. 17:49, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

That's how I do it. –Inquisitor Sasha 17:54, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
I like how you made that edit on my talk page. –Inquisitor Sasha 17:56, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Why not include links to your talk page? Why be an asshole when so many people have asked you to do that? Inspiration Move me brightly. 17:57, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
I'll do it, but not when you're being weird about it and spending your time stalking me and editing all my signatures. Then again, I realize it's really juvenile and I'll change it. –Inquisitor Sasha 18:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] I am not a troll.

Why don't you like me? I just want to make interesting discussions and share my ideas for improving the site--Inquistor Behrenstein (talk) 19:41, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Impersonation

Is a dick move, just so you know. Peter mqzp 02:58, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Replied User_talk:PeterL#ImpersonationInquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 03:06, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Baby steps.

Can you try to go, like, 48 hours, without doing something that you end up having to apologize for? And then maybe build from there? Inspiration Move me brightly. 03:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes. –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 03:19, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

[edit] That "medal" on your user page.

It makes you look like a fool. all the more because you apparently designed it and awarded it to yourself. But having it float over the page while I scroll downwards? That's the kicker. Did he doubt/Or did he try? 12:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

I removed that because it looks like shit. I replaced the scrolling fixed position with the user tools template, which is far more useful. I'm also far too modest to want to be announcing it that loudly, though I think that it's something that people might want to keep it mind should they get the idea that RW would be better off without me. If you clicked the revision link, you would see that it's actually based on a verbal award for doing exactly what it says. I'll probably make a collapsible section for it, so it's not so prominent. –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 22:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
"I'm also far too modest to want to be announcing it that loudly" So then why do you have a GIANT RED BOX trumpeting an award you MADE UP and GAVE YOURSELF? "it's actually based on a verbal award..." That's someone saying "thank you." That is not an award. There is a difference. Did he doubt/Or did he try? 22:09, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Calm down bro, I put it in a collapsible section where people can only see it if they scroll down to the section, and then also click a link that says to expand the section. I made the medal as a template so anyone could use it, and I needed to have something to test it on. You don't see it anymore, and neither does anyone else. –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 22:15, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
What about this (the link at the top) while you're at it? Peter mqzp 22:23, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
I'll dispose of it. I put it there when people were crapping on me, but it was a shit idea. –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 22:34, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Your signature, again.

So help me Christ, an animated GIF. I'm only surprised it took you this long to do that. Also, you have two links to your user page in your signature, but no link to your talk page. If the thunder don't get you/Then the lightning will. 20:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Fine. I'll fucking change it. –Nazis are bad and I don't like them Deadhorse.gif 00:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
I like the gif, personally.Transitional FormStill Durbinating 02:01, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
It's grotesque. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 02:38, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
LOL I totally forgot about position: fixed. Thanks! Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 02:43, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Here you are, writing about rape again.

More rape. Maybe instead of an anti-bigotry wiki, you should have considered started RapeWiki. She said her name was Billie Jean and she was fresh in town/I didn't know her stage-line ran from hell. 15:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I expanded that article to cover non rape subjects. Furthermore, I changed the title to not reflect rape, and to focus on additional war crimes. I suppose in your mind, it would be better to sweep the entire subject under the rug, and allow Nazi revisionists to run wild with BS claims that portray the Germans as victims of persecution by foreign invaders. I also see that you think that I should have started a wiki about rape; I don't think that you're really sarcastic about that. I did not mention rape in my recent edits; it is clear that you are obsessing about rape. –Inquisitor Ehrenstein (Talk | Contribs | Mikal's ragebox) 17:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I even said this on the talk page, yet you didn't read it. Yep, clearly you are obsessing and focusing only on rape. If I wrote a 1,000 page book about some random topic and mentioned the word rape once, you would mention it. I get the feeling that you're using me to satisfy your interest in rape. I do something vaguely related, and you rant about it, thereby giving you a chance to think about rape. Nice reaction formation. –Inquisitor Ehrenstein (Talk | Contribs | Mikal's ragebox) 17:06, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
EC Yes, you are absolutely correct. I think the main purpose of this wiki should be to focus on claims that portray the Germans as victims of persecution by foreign invaders. That's exactly my agenda here. That, and as many stories about rape as possible. She said her name was Billie Jean and she was fresh in town/I didn't know her stage-line ran from hell. 17:08, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I was mad when I wrote that. Still, I was broadening the article to include non rape related material, and did not make rape related edits. That, and for on mission work, I think your comment was unwarrented. –Inquisitor Ehrenstein (Talk | Contribs | Mikal's ragebox) 21:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Just as a aside: IE, you might want to reconsider the estimate of 10 million rape victims. I've skimmed through Gertjejanssen, whom yu gave as a source and I did not find that number. As an additional aside: academi courtesy and standards usually require that you give some page numbers with your references. BUt maybe that's different where you live. Cheers Th. BernhardDas Leben ist ein Prozeß, den man verliert, was man auch tut und wer man auch ist. 20:23, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I'll change it. I'm going to add the page numbers. The book I just added was one I cited recently, but I didn't have time to grab the page number. –Inquisitor Ehrenstein (Talk | Contribs | Mikal's ragebox) 21:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Have you been on a Warhammer forum?

What is that, like a chat-up line? WēāŝēīōīďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 20:10, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Hey baby, what's a nice Orc shaman like you doing in a level 3 dungeon like this? SophieWilder 20:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

[edit] keep that up

see how long you get to keep them fancy rights you got. --MikallakiM 18:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

I did a three second block. It's what we do here. Three seconds is short enough that it shouldn't cause a problem. Though, I still won't do that sort of thing a lot because it would make RC really long. –Inquisitor Ehrenstein (Talk | Contribs | Mikal's ragebox) 18:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Spam be spam love--MikallakiM 18:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
I just said I'm not going to do it a lot, and I have not. Please, use the ragebox. –Inquisitor Ehrenstein (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 18:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Toolbox
support