User talk:Miekal
Hai Thar; for the page histoy prior to June 2nd 1012 and any Liquidthread stuff, go to Here!
Contents |
[edit] people talk
[edit] Ahem
Okay, knee-jerk bad snark aside, I do intend to present a new asshole to our concern troll friend, with LEGITIMATE SOURCES®©™, and protecting your new pet edit war is hardly good form. PacWalker 13:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- And i'd like us to, but not from how he was doing it. Protecting it made sure he didn't keep edit warring over the inclusion of how we essentially never do refuttals unless it's a side by side. --Miekal 13:17, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- I have not vandalized the page as you claimed in your edit summary, if my edits were problematic, i will address it. Please be mature and unprotect the page so that I can refute the crank claim. --LobPo (talk) 13:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- I see. Would it be considered rude to run a prelim draft/source gathering elsewhere (i.e. in userspace?) PacWalker 13:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- no? go for it. Besides something about period blood i have little knowledge of the bullshit claims as to why women can't fight in the military. --Miekal 13:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey, on a not unrelated note, you just lowered my blood pressure by at least 5 points. I guess I probably ought to thank you. PacWalker 13:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
[edit] US superpower debate
Please don't delete this page. It is a very interesting and relevant topic. --LobPo (talk) 15:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, sunshine, but you're an idiot. Were it down to me, you'd be blocked. Scream!! (talk) 15:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Regardless of LobPo's stupidity, what made the discussion deletionworthy? FuzzyCatTomato (talk/stalk) 16:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- I mean after all it *is* serving as a nice repository for all of our spare {{DFTT}} templates... oh. not how that works... ah well. PacWalker 16:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- [EC] Some bullshit is not worth the time it takes to read it. MaillardFillmore (talk) 16:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Regardless of LobPo's stupidity, what made the discussion deletionworthy? FuzzyCatTomato (talk/stalk) 16:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
[edit] BC, BCE
Same shit. Both are backwards systems, in every way possible. 32℉uzzy, 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 13:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, they're both backwards, but there's a reason the weatherman doesn't use the word Kelvin. PacWalker 13:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- A very very bad reason. Everyone should speak in SI-units. :P 141.134.75.236 (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- (EC) Because Kelvin is unfamiliar to his viewers, not because it's actually good or bad. Cømrade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 13:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly what I meant, actually. Likewise, the goatple are woefully unfamiliar with alternate epochs. PacWalker 13:59, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Plan: Turn every single RationalWiki page into nothing but a loosely-topical set of dates, each one hyperlinked to a multi-megabyte page explaining the Grand International RationalWiki Dates System. Soon, they shall know... FuzzyCatTomato (talk/stalk) 14:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- GIRDS. Hmm. PacWalker 14:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- That acronym looks awkwardly similar to GRIDS. :/ 141.134.75.236 (talk) 14:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Fine. Grand Omni-Anthropic Temporal System. FuzzyCatTomato (talk/stalk) 14:21, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Butbutbut TimeCube. PacWalker 14:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Lol. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 14:24, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Butbutbut TimeCube. PacWalker 14:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Fine. Grand Omni-Anthropic Temporal System. FuzzyCatTomato (talk/stalk) 14:21, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- That acronym looks awkwardly similar to GRIDS. :/ 141.134.75.236 (talk) 14:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- GIRDS. Hmm. PacWalker 14:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Plan: Turn every single RationalWiki page into nothing but a loosely-topical set of dates, each one hyperlinked to a multi-megabyte page explaining the Grand International RationalWiki Dates System. Soon, they shall know... FuzzyCatTomato (talk/stalk) 14:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly what I meant, actually. Likewise, the goatple are woefully unfamiliar with alternate epochs. PacWalker 13:59, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- (EC) Because Kelvin is unfamiliar to his viewers, not because it's actually good or bad. Cømrade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 13:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
- A very very bad reason. Everyone should speak in SI-units. :P 141.134.75.236 (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
[edit] The age thing (Clinton et al)
Hi Miekal.
I just noticed that you cut the "she's too old"-thing from the Hillary Clinton article and I raised the general question about when & why someone is "too old" on Talk:2016 Democratic Party presidential nomination#When and why are someone "too old" to be POTUS? I'm wondering why we have this objection to Biden and Clinton (though I tend to agree on Sanders, but he has no chance anyway), but no one has made it about a slew of Republicans in the same age bracket, or about lesser known Democrats, such as Webb. ScepticWombat (talk) 20:51, 12 April 2015 (UTC)