User talk:Millicent
[edit] Read this....
Even if it available elsewhere on the internet, we do not include personal information about people in our articles. Thanks. PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.
20:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- It's not personal information, it's public information in Norway, published on the website of the national broadcasting company. Millicent (talk) 20:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- That's nice. But it does not need to be published here. Thanks. PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.
20:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- That's nice. But it does not need to be published here. Thanks. PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.
- Which policy says that we cannot include relevant context such as this[1]? This information was posted in an interview with himself published on his own website. Millicent (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Well, there's nothing there that says that, is there? Moreover, I fail to see how his employment history is relevant to his arguments. PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.
21:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- 1) You didn't ask for details and 2) The fact that he has not had any recent affiliation with mainstream newspapers is relevant. Millicent (talk) 21:18, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- 1) I didn't ask for details because I'm not interested in them and 2) No it isn't attack him for what he writes, not for where he does or does not work. Thanks. PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.
21:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- 1) I didn't ask for details because I'm not interested in them and 2) No it isn't attack him for what he writes, not for where he does or does not work. Thanks. PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.
- 1) You didn't ask for details and 2) The fact that he has not had any recent affiliation with mainstream newspapers is relevant. Millicent (talk) 21:18, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Well, there's nothing there that says that, is there? Moreover, I fail to see how his employment history is relevant to his arguments. PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.
- Which policy says that we cannot include relevant context such as this[1]? This information was posted in an interview with himself published on his own website. Millicent (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Other articles here include such material. Eg. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ed_Poor#Ed.27s_job Millicent (talk) 21:53, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
And we need less of that, not more of it. PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.
22:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
[edit] Autopatrolled + Sysop
Based on your edits and general lack of insanity, I grant you sysop status. Let the ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ course through your veins, and also see here for more information. If you have questions, feel free to ask another editor.FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 18:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
- What a lovely surprise :) Millicent (talk) 20:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Enjoy your incredible new powers. Remember, with small power, comes small responsibility. FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 22:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
[edit] Page you created for deletion
The citations included in the article don't bear out some of the charges about the subject, and I'd appreciate any insight you have about what I might have missed. Ikanreed (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2015 (UTC)