|Thread title||Replies||Last modified|
|Your personality, summarised in two edits||1||01:08, 23 July 2011|
|Blocks||0||04:51, 30 June 2011|
|HIV/AIDS||2||02:44, 28 June 2011|
|A delayed response.||0||01:26, 15 June 2011|
|Eh?||13||02:30, 13 June 2011|
|User:JSTC||2||02:29, 6 June 2011|
|Illiterate||3||13:59, 3 June 2011|
Here is the instinctual reaction of an unimaginative sycophant and idiot - block, revert, repress, ignore, destroy. Here is where you realise that your superior has sanctioned the post, and you slavishly fall into line.
The concentration camps were full of guards like you. You make me sick.
Hardly. And I'm sick of hearing all the bullshit Nazi analogies- it is you who makes me sick for comparing all who you do not like to Nazis. You are the one defending them with ridiculous claims, not I; and I think idiots such as yourself with the "hero complex" should have been outright banned long ago- censorship is not always evil I'm afraid. And I reverted because I did not see that P Foster replied so fast.
Hey, just so you know, we tend to avoid indefinite/infinite blocks. Three months is more than enough most of the time, and anyone patient to wait around that long just to vandalize again will just get blocked again anyway. Also remember that we have the vandal bin, which means we can sometimes do without blocks at all.
I added a subsection about the current debate about when to start treatment for HIV infection. You deleted it. Why? What is your POV on the subject? The subject of authoritarianism seems to be part of your mission statement. Do you believe that AIDS carriers who are denied proper treatment are given a say in the matter?
it had no reference and the tone didn't match the rest of the article.
Diging up citations would not be a problem. You still haven't stated your POV on the subject, which makes it hard to answer your concerns. As for "tone", I'm afraid I cannot speak to that. --I haven't chosen a username yet. (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
My talk page. Sorry for the delay.
Was it the cheerleader trolls causing all that wandalism? I thought it was Lockett-related.
I believe so for several reasons. First, Publix is a grocery store in the Southern US, where Brant/Ex-troll cheerleader has stated she lives. Second, both account have been inactive and 3, she has admitted to trolling in the past, so put 1 + 2 + 3 together. Cheers
Seems logical enough. I fucking gate cheerleaders....
And apparently she's a crat on wikipedia?! Don't know if i believe that, but if that's true, thats fucked up.
This edit also leaves no doubt who we're dealing with.
WP crat? That is fucked up. I mean, imagining the captain of the pom squad at my old school an editor at WP ould frighten me. I am thinking on doing an article on cheerleading now. Ms. Bryant must be stopped. And that edit? Cheerleader pussy is full of AIDS and other disease and Pippa surely must not.
He's already on a long block, as will anyone who tries to get that shit on the wiki again.
I understand that, but the vandal bins is for when his block expires and after 24 hours when the username block would not longer block the IP address from account creation.
Also, your deleting the WIGO screwed up the numbering of the one above it, by keeping the same number. I might be illiterate, but at least I know how a fucking wiki works.