|Thread title||Replies||Last modified|
|Your WIGOs||1||15:02, 26 February 2013|
|Blue can fuck off and die||7||21:45, 23 February 2013|
|Ace World Tour - 2013||6||06:22, 10 February 2013|
|You don't like me.||5||22:50, 7 February 2013|
|I do get annoyed when the new kids decide that the content that brought most people here in the first place needs to be deleted.||5||19:49, 14 January 2013|
|Sterile for mod||2||17:13, 27 December 2012|
|"Answer the question."||8||21:20, 27 October 2012|
|Can you block me as well. I am determined to think I cannot help myself.||4||18:05, 26 October 2012|
|Foreign language accounts||4||14:53, 29 August 2012|
|Then||1||12:17, 29 August 2012|
|Creator of "The Spirit Science"||1||05:31, 10 August 2012|
|One minor issue||1||15:41, 2 August 2012|
|Gimp Cock Terrorism||1||08:47, 26 July 2012|
First you WIGO a story about a diamond ring, then do one about someone proposing marriage. Hmmm...
Please stop moving Roko's basilisk without discussion and blocking people for long durations. This constitutes an abuse of administrative privileges.
We do have talk pages for this kind of issue you know.
What's the point when they're inhabited by wankers who think that kind of recursively-wanking shit is relevant?
Because by using a talk page you can use your eloquence and intelligence to persuade others of the validity of your position. Admittedly this is easier for some than others.
When the users concerned are only concerned with tonguing the balls of the owner of the site, and/or his critics, there's no point debating. That's abundantly clear from the talk page as it already exists. The fixation of some users with LW is ridiculous, especially as there's something close to a 100% link between LW lovers and people criticising others for wanting to keep some kind of focus on CP.
Hey buddy - I am traveling a lot this year and will be in London mid-June. Drink?
That sounds like a splendid idea. There are a couple of things I have planned later in the year but I should be able to adjust those so they don't clash. Let me know when you'll be around.
I'll keep ya posted. I have a lot of people to see and a lot of things to do but I'll be in London at least 2 or 3 days.
If you've got a real schedule clash, and you fancy popping out to the Tower Bridge sort of area, I could always meet you for a pint or two at lunch time. Which also has the advantage that we have a cast-iron excuse to get rid of each other after an hour if we don't get on.
Anyway, the whole city will have been taken over by creationism before you get here.
Fine, I don't give a shit. Have the fucking manners to keep it to yourself.
You used to be a decent person. I have no idea what has changed you into the obnoxious shit that currently presents itself to the site but I hope you undo it.
It's not bad manners to point out when somebody who was once nice becomes nasty. I'm trying to get you to wake up and take a long, hard look at yourself.
FFS, what the FUCK has your religious conversion done to you?????????
Maybe religion is part of my attempt to deal with a bunch of shit that's gone horribly wrong lately, I dunno, I'm just fed up. Sorry if I've been acting like a cunt.
How can you believe in something you already know not to exist?
All I know is that I used to look forward to reading your posts. These days I see you crop up on RC and instantly assume it's going to be something that annoys me. Changing outlook isn't wrong, and it's one reason I switch from rpeh to SuspectedReplicant, but as least the basis of my beliefs remain reasonably consistent.
In the latest case, I can't believe you're agreeing that shutting down proxy (and even IP) access for everyone because of the actions of one person is a Good Thing. It's a case of one user being an idiot; that user gets shut down; he tries some other things; he gets bored; he goes away.
Yes, other people dealt with a brief vandal attack. I was cooking dinner or I'd have dealt with it myself. That's shit happening.
I do get annoyed when the new kids decide that the content that brought most people here in the first place needs to be deleted.
"New kids?" Idiot.
Wasn't talking to you. Asshat. I really don't know when you started being such a fucking idiot but I wish you'd go back to how you used to be.
Sorry, dude. Didn't mean to piss you off -- but seeing as how that thread was populated entirely by old-timers and regulars, I couldn't see any reason to drag the question of "new kids" into it. And referring to a guy who's been here only a few months less than you, and who has been a regular for three years as a "new kid" isn't really helping your argument very much. And hey, I yam what I yam.
My first girlfriend was seven days older than me. I used to tell her I was only interested because I was into older women.
Can barely resist urge to insert "your mother" joke here.
I do not bother trying to argue with obvious misogynists, racists, homophobes, as that would imply that they have an "argument" worth engaging with. I can't remember the exact wording, but Woody Allen once said something about how you shouldn't argue with fascists; you should beat them with baseball bats. I can get behind that.
How does one answer a question when there is no meaningful question to answer? How does one refute an argument when there is no real argument to refute? A madman stands on the corner screaming that he has proof that the world is going to end tomorrow. Do you bother to discuss his points rationally with him, or do you just move along? A hateful troll leaves a bunch of stupid nonsense on a page, and demands an answer to it. Do you try to reason with the hateful troll, or do you move along?
Are you really equating me to a crazy person ranting about the end of the world? The only thing I was saying is that I'm tired of hearing how privileged man are, and that being a woman has it's perks too. If somehow, saying that women have it better in some areas is misogyny, I'm a fucking happy misogynist. But that isn't the case and you know this. I know you well enough to know that you're not that stupid.
If you believe that makes me a misogynist, well, I can't do much more than to say I'm not, because I'm not. But keep in mind that "misogyny" has an actual definition and saying that men can't grow a child in them clearly doesn't fall under it. Neither would pointing out that women have THE POSSIBILITY of manipulating men, now if I said that all women do that, that would be misogyny. But I don't say that, because I know better.
I guess you mistook my argument as a man calling the whambulance, instead of a call for objectivity. Maybe it was the sarcastic and hyperbolic way I did it in, but that's me and it's not going to change.
If you'd like to have an honest discussion without unfactual name-calling, that would be nice and if you don't I won't bother you further.
curious. what area do women have a "perk" in? What aspect of our lives are better then men's just by being women? If your answer is "child birth", my answer is 1 in 10,000 women in will die from it. 1 in 4, throughout most of human history. 1 in 1 will have extrem discomfort, serious pain, and real complications.
You are correct, on the other hand men will never feel a little human being kicking inside of them. And from the pregnant women I've met, that's not exactly annoying the first dozen times (although I've heard different things once the play soccer with said women's blatter). Yet, it's a thing men can't experience.
I am not in control of my trolling. It must be natural for me.
It's just someonbody trying to figure some shit out. I got an e-mail from them explaining what was going on.
Not the one I re-blocked, it isn't. Check out the contents of the page I deleted.
Given we have this do we want a high profile in Arabic?
Apparently you Commie Bastards don't believe in Free Speech.
John F. Kennedy assassination. Wikipedia. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories. Wikipedia. A series of investigation videos by Gill Jesus: , , , , , ,  Another series videos from Bob Harris: , , , , , , [7,  Was Lee Harvey Oswald really guilty? by Gill Jesus: An website that proves Lee Harvey Oswald was innocent of everything. Compelling Evidence: A New Look at the Assassination of President Kennedy by Michael T. Griffith JFKHistory by Bob Harris: Legitimate facts related to the crime, supporting a case for conspiracy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htxY8_amToY&feature=plcp: A set of released classified CIA documents connect the assassination to the Watergate scandal that brought down Richard Nixon, and possible involvement by other U.S. presidents such as Gerald Ford and Lyndon B. Johnson. Jesse Ventura interviews Lee Harvey Oswald's wife to gain more insight into the proof that Oswald was a CIA operative. TheJFKConspiracy.com Rush to Judgment/: Mark Lane's classic documentary on the JFK assassination in which he interviews important witnesses whose statements contradict the conclusions of the Warren Commission. The Murder, The Patsy, The Conspiracy/pg1: A look at the evidence proving conspiracy in the murder. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread710323/pg1: A look at the story of Lee Bowers. An Analysis of Lee Harvey Oswald/pg1: A look at the man who was said to have been the killer of President Kennedy. http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v1n2/physical.html http://www.realhistoryarchives.com/collections/assassinations/jfk/basicev.htm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFSHP5bhNZs: Robert J. Groden, for the first time, shows his optically enhanced films and photographs from that dark day and the investigation and cover-up that followed. Mastered from Mr. Groden’s original materials. Website is dedicated to providing accurate information about Lee Harvey Oswald, as presented by those witnesses The Men Who Killed Kennedy: , , , , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TydmPwb_TRE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VI07govlUqI&feature=plcp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vkH2ILChHo&feature=plcp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_qQ0FBocFw&feature=plcp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuFDz-Z1jbY&feature=plcp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyvRfeLDsB4 Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig was on duty on November 22nd, and made crucial observations. Unlike others, he saw nothing wrong in telling people the truth of what he observed. After his name appeared in books, articles etc., his life changed, not for the better. Attempts were made on his life; his car blew up, he was shot at, and he was practically forced off the road and barely survived the accident. Amongst his many crucial observations at the Plaza, is Oswald running down the Grassy Knoll, being picked up by a slow driving station wagon, heading west in Elm St. after being signaled to. Also the rifle with the clear stamp on the barrel reading "7.65 Mauser" found in the depository. That is only some of the crucial observations he made.
I accidentaly hit "Save page" instead of "Show preview" that was not complete... I have not used wiki formating for a few years and was trying to see how the inline citations work I think "The Spirit Science" falls under the purpose of this wiki  
Discussion continued implies that people actually want to continue the discussion on Talk:Theology, whereas in reality it's just Proxima... being Proxima
Thanks for the callout. That sigil isn't technically very good but I'm still proud of the vein on the bottom cock. I've snuck cocks in as extremely low contrast easter eggs in the last few web sites I wrote. Maybe one day I'll be able to take credit for something like this. Cheers.