User talk:Sleuth

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Sleuth!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

rational ghey (talk) 17:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Shhhhh......[edit]

I'm on vacation, but logged in as my bot to quick archive that whole mess. Cheers. The Goonie 1, aka PunchingBag (talk) 22:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

A sysopric in the See of your choice[edit]

There's some infuckignstructions around here somewhere... ħumanUser talk:Human 06:20, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Danke Sleuth (talk) 22:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Reversion on Ayn Rand[edit]

I think that Libertarian1's edit wasn't bad, since the sentence he removed was a bit of a word salad. While reverting his edit you appeared to remove a large amount of the content from the article. I'm not sure if that's intentional, but it's worth discussing on the talk page if making such large changes to an article with a history of causing people to bang shoes on podiums. --ConcernedResident daydream, for the ladies 20:37, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

sorry, device edit issue, wiped my edit summary too
No worries. Come join the ongoing fight on the talk page. I've no idea why this article is such a hot topic, since we could have a better time arguing over William Shatner's TekWar series. --ConcernedResident brisket, for the ladies 20:52, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

TK[edit]

Please don't do that again. The Talk page explains why he's blocked. --ConcernedResident kumquat, for the ladies 16:42, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Unsysopped[edit]

You've been unsysopped for unblocking TK, when it clearly says on his userpage that he is to remain blocked. FrankThePseudoscientist (talk) 16:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Deundesysopsing might be a bit extreme if it was a "joke." TK is a sore point and likely not a good thing to mess with. tmtoulouse 17:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry if I'm having trouble understanding here Tmtoulouse but, are you saying we should or should not re-consider de-sysopping this user? I think that, if they can make a good defense, then re-sysopping should be up to the community. FrankThePseudoscientist (talk) 18:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
I think you did the right thing until we hear something. ConcernedResident rucksack, for the ladies 18:32, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
New user comes out of nowhere, and after less than a month gets demoted and just wanders off and unblocks TK by chance? Yeah, I buy that. --Kels (talk) 18:44, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
This user either has bad judgment or is stirring shit. Either way, I wouldn't agree to demoting him again. Godspeed! Nutty Roux (talk) 19:24, 19 May 2010 (UTC)