User talk:Weaseloid

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Banana.gif Banana.gif Banana.gif Banana.gif Banana.gif
Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif

Nods.gif Slap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gif Nods.gif
Nods.gif Slap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gif - ARCHIVES - Slap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gif Nods.gif
Nods.gif   Slap.gif 1 (mostly boring) Slap.gif 2 (mostly arguments) Slap.gif   Nods.gif
Nods.gif   Slap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gif   Nods.gif
Nods.gif 3 (mostly insults) Slap.gif 4 (mostly tedious) Slap.gif 5 (mostly complaints) Nods.gif
Nods.gif Slap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gifSlap.gif Nods.gif

Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif Shakinghead.gif Nods.gif

Contents

[edit] Congrats

You've been re-elected to the Moderator position. The Noisy Orchestra Oi! Oi! Oi! 13:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, and I really appreciate your standing down. But please wait for more users' input/comment before making any changes or announcements of results. I don't want to come out of this thing looking like a usurper, so let's see if everyone is happy with this interpretation of the results before going ahead. €₳$£ΘĪÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel
Alright, fair enough. The Noisy Orchestra Oi! Oi! Oi! 13:30, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Bootstar?

Some people say...that you're awesome! :) Bootmii(Nomic) 03:39, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Really? Who are these people? Square.gif ЩєазєюіδWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 06:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Gay lobby strikes again

Gay lobby.
Back passage not displayed.

Once again, the gays have prevented a discussion about their parasitical activities. When will you allow a free and fair discussion about homosexuality? — Unsigned, by: MarkCarthy / talk / contribs

[edit] Right, cause there's totally an Oompa Loompa land!

Thanks for the save, I forget that with my already racist username people might fail to see the humor and go right for OMG racist! So thanks again. C®ackeЯ 02:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for unblocking me. Although blocking Tor exit nodes is kind of pointless, I just press "Use New Identity" in Vidalia and Tor gives me a new one. Since Tisane's page could well be illegal, I am complaining via Tor because I don't want to admit having seen it in a way which could be tied to my real life identity (e.g. via my IP address). 85.17.26.51 (talk) 12:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Sure, but by linking to it you're prompting other readers to look at it from their own IP. WëäŝëïöïďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 12:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Yeah you are right. I didn't quite think this through, did I now. But maybe now as many people as possible should look at it. As they say, there is safety in numbers. 85.17.26.51 (talk) 12:19, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

[edit] That link

Would you like for me to add it to the spam filter for the duration of this? ТyBored 12:15, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank link, or that entire website... Hipocrite (talk) 12:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
(EC) Not particularly. Only if people keep posting it. WèàšèìòìďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 12:17, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Alright. ТyBored 12:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)


[edit] Mod stuff

Read and comment, please. Thanks!--ADtalkModerator 04:08, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


Hi I am new and I was told that my username is offensive in the UK. Could you change it to Guidedog? Guidewog (talk) 23:49, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

[edit] About credentials

I listed Melissa Harris-Perry's degrees to be thorough, though I concede it was pedantic, as we do link to her website. Because I'm new here, I do not know, should I only go into detail about credentials when they are suspect? --TheLateGatsby (talk) 18:13, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, unless it's particularly relevant. WẽãšẽĩõĩďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 18:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Got it, thank you. --TheLateGatsby (talk) 18:51, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Patience

You don't think that you could maybe wait for a little discussion before deleting articles that this "agnosticorationale" spent time on creating? Try to imagine how frustrating it must be to spend time completing something only to have it instantly shut down. I'm not saying that the articles should be kept. I'm sure that they're worthy of deletion. But you need to consider the implications of swift deletion before anything. You wouldn't want to needlessly bring down another user.--"Shut up, Brx." 18:21, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

[edit] WTF?

Why the hell did you take off both my articles? I left comprehensive references to replace the Google Test. You could have at least followed them before deleting my goddamn work...

-- AgnosticoRationale

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) Thank you.
Your references don't establish those things as "internet laws"; one of them was a comment posted in a forum today FFS. We're not a repository of forced memes, and don't need to write an article about it every time somebody somewhere on the internet says something they think is witty. WëäŝëïöïďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 18:33, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Rights

I'm an elected mod. My constituents require representation. Chop, chop. Acei9 12:19, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Once you stop fucking around with other users' rights, you'll get yours back. WěǎšěǐǒǐďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 12:51, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
He already did, thanks to Punky. -- Nx / talk 12:52, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
For Chrissakes, take them away again. He's obviously dead set on abusing them.--"Shut up, Brx." 13:12, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
What did he do now? WẽãšẽĩõĩďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 13:14, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Just now, he removed all of Blue and Nx's rights.--"Shut up, Brx." 13:45, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Report

Thanks for that. it's really strange to read it, cause it's like "yeah, THAT!". First question I was asked is "why were you at the bar, where you looking to hook up?" as if that somehow would make it less a rape. I hope things have changed in the now 30 years. Sounds from this, like most of the studies that had "icky cops being mean" were 80-90s. unless of course you are a drug addict, a prostitute, a gay man, or the wife of a policman/soldier.--Green mowse.pngGodot She was a venus demilo in her sister's jeans 22:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Just something I found on a Google search. Haven't read it fully; just scanned the intro & conclusion, but it's an interesting study. WeaseloidWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 07:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Move

I don't think my post belongs here. — Haamer 17:20, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

- Shrug. - So move it here. €₳$£ΘĪÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 18:07, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Moves

Why do you move all my posts to the forum falsifiability which is a discussion on Popper. So a screed on suicide gets moved there and also a neuroscience discussion also gets moved there. Why is that? I do not understand the logic. Ta. Dirk Steele (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Because they're all reiterations of you airing your views on mental health & diagnosis, and I'm tired of seeing multiple variants of the same debate taking up half the Saloon Bar. If you're going to keep starting thread after thread on the same topic, please keep it within one forum page and don't keep spamming the Bar with it. Ta. WëäŝëïöïďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 21:11, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

[edit] AndrewStewart1

I dunno, the Truman thing was better than a redirect, showed some potential. Your call, but there are editors here of long standing who do far worse without getting reverted on sight and blocked. Theory of Practice "Now we stand outcast and starving 'mid the wonders we have made." 20:30, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

I had nothing to do with the blocking & don't approve of it. But the two stubs I looked at were embarrassing frothy-mouthed rant. The Harry Truman article can be reinstated if somebody's going to temper & balance it a bit, but as it stood I don't think it was better than a redirect. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 20:38, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Boxing day

Thanks for getting rid of the cat. Redchuck.gif ГенгисunbelievingModerator 20:32, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

It's still there. I left it alternating randomly between the two images. WěǎšěǐǒǐďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 20:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
I must be having a lucky run then. Redchuck.gif ГенгисpillagingModerator 10:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Uh

Are you resigning? Do you want your rights back at some point? Picon small.pngLiquid Blue 23:59, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Not particularly; otherwise I would have signed up to stand in the election. They expire in, what, nine days anyway, & I think I get cope without them till then & the wiki likewise, but if you want to tell Reckless Noise Symphony that he's now a mod for the next nine days, by all means go ahead. WèàšèìòìďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 00:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Actually, since he declined his election candidature, it's probably more bother than necessary to make RNS a moderator for now. Can the wiki survive with just six moderators for a week? WěǎšěǐǒǐďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 00:30, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
We can survive with no moderators, as long as the dickheads don't wake up. Redchuck.gif ГенгисGum diseaseModerator 10:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
I have been awake for hours. Acei9 21:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
"If men were angels..." Picon small.pngAcer Blue 21:37, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Please reconsider running, Weas. You're among the few it seems doesn't feel compelled to reinvent the role to consolidate power, yet do nothing to ensure our new rules are enforced fairly. GK's definitely got the right idea about "light touch"; I haven't seen you act any differently and I trust your judgment so far. The only thing that matters is being prudent about putting out fires, not all this bullshit extraneous posturing. Do it. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 22:18, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
100% agree with Nutty. Mods like yourself, GK and AD are what is mandated for. Not for people who have these grand statement like they are running for political office because mods aren't any sort of grander position. Just assholes with more buttons, not community drivers/elected officials/senior users. Acei9 22:31, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Nutty & Ace; I really appreciate that. But, having suggested that this mod election is irrelevant & unwanted (which maybe it isn't after all), it would be a little hypocritical if I stood for election now. I also do support reinventing the role (at least to some extent) but that's more to do with widening power rather than consolidating it. I really don't think the seven-guy STV popularity contest is in the community's interests, & having pointed this out several times to no avail, it would again be hypocritical for me to continue within the existing system while it remains unchanged. When the role is open to more candidates on a less capricious selection process, I'd be happy to put myself forward again.
So how come you guys aren't standing? WěǎšěǐǒǐďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 22:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
So how come you guys aren't standing? Me? Really? Even if nominated I would decline having abrogated my responsibilities last time in a somewhat bombastic fashion it'd be a cruel joke to run. A joke on me more than anyone. I haven't read the conversation you linked to but will do so now but I feel, looking at those who have stood and the lack of enthusiasm in general, that this has come down to a total failure in the mod system. But I stand by what I say in regards to you, GK and AD. Acei9 22:56, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
So how come you guys aren't standing? WėąṣėḷőįďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 22:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
I don't see any real point in running now that the discussion is effectively over and I've alienated myself enough by getting quite angry in prior discussions. I don't even think there are enough editors left who understand the discussion for it to go anywhere. It really does seem to me to be exactly the popularity contest people who purported to want order railed against in the bureaucrat system and that we're worse off for it. My real interest is in continuing to help the board but, despite doing the corporate filings and dozens of hours of research and other work, I'm not even sure I can win that election. I fear that the popularity contest is going to spill over there as well. Oh well. As for Ace's perspective, I mostly agree but we've had some heated off-wiki arguments. I don't think AD is a great choice. Good enough, but not great. He's just as disconnected from fairly enforcing new rules, though I think he's in it for the right reasons. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 23:02, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

[edit] One-liners

You're right. Sorry about that.--Krejtalk 23:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

No biggy. I just don't like coming to a page & finding it's only a few words. Could the comments re Bob Barefoot maybe be put into the Kevin Trudeau article, unless you think there's much else to be written about BB? WěǎšěǐǒǐďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 23:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply. Anyway, yes, I'll do that just as soon as I get to a non-mobile device.--Krejtalk 22:28, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

[edit] "Nonsensical block reason"

Dirk Steele was blocked earlier per his own request. [1] When immediately thereafter another editor joins the same conversation saying exactly the same thing in exactly the same manner, I am inclined to think that editor a sockpuppet. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 22:24, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

So fuckin' what? Did he ask for all his socks to be blocked? Has the community had any input? ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 22:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
I did not ask to be blocked. I stated that if censorship of ideas was the rule and that thinking differently from the 'norms' of RW was a crime.. then I would be glad to be blocked. For two years!! So do not play the straw man please.. helloSailor 22:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
When I asked if you wanted to be permabanned, you said yes. See the diff-link above. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 22:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
where? Quote in context. helloSailor 22:39, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
All right, since you cannot be bothered to click a diff-link, here goes:
  • You: "Theory of Practice now rules RationalWiki. Look at his actions. Censorship by fascism. I give up on this site."
  • Me: "Would you care to formalize that giving up by having yourself permabanned?"
  • You: "Yes. Just undo all of his censorship in the past day. See for yourselves."
Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 22:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
And did anyone "undo all TheoryOfPractice's censorship"? Because it looks like a conditional request. Besides which, we have a history of not permabanning people, even when they ask for it. Besides which, if somebody asks to be banned (in a "so ban me why don't ya?" comment) then goes on editing as a sockpuppet, it suggests they didn't really intend to be blocked, doesn't it? ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 22:47, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Look. I am on an uber ultra rant! You cannot expect me to remember every fucking incoherant statement that I make... 22:54, 20 January 2013 (UTC)helloSailor
And so ban me! But you will have to ban all the other nutters here also.. (no I only mean't ban me in a symbolic metaphorical way.. you know..) helloSailor 22:57, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Cunt

You're the worst cunt of them all. Free MarcusCicero. Now. ProudTory (talk) 11:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello Marcus. I did rather suspect it might be you. Your spelling is improving. Keep it up. WėąṣėḷőįďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 11:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Fuck you. ProudTory (talk) 11:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Always a pleasure. WèàšèìòìďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 11:39, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Amn't I going to be banned? the only reason I behave like this is because I usually have so very little time. ProudTory (talk) 11:41, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Not by me, but I expect somebody else will oblige. If you used your time better, it might not keep happening. WèàšèìòìďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 11:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Numerous times I tried to come back by asking to be forgiven, but some little virgin dweeb like Tyrannis or Nx shows up and I'm banned again. You're like a slave owner telling his slave that if only he were less black he might be allowed to be free. ProudTory (talk) 11:46, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Not really. I'm not responsible for whether you get banned or not; but as long as you keep behaving like a dick, I don't think you'll get a lot of sympathy. ЩєазєюіδWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 11:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
So you don't think you're just like a southern slave owner circa 1850? ProudTory (talk) 11:55, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Nope. ωεαşεζόίďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 11:57, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Help me help myself. Be my advocate. Help me with a retrial. The first one was bogus and wrong, we all know that. It was a show trial in the Stalinist tradition. You're a man of wisdom and good sense, help me fight the evil in this place so that I can bring about the reforms so desperately needed. ProudTory (talk) 11:59, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Why would I? You just called me the worst cunt of them all. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 12:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
That was before I saw your humanity and your inherent sense of destiny. ProudTory (talk) 12:14, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
You silver-tongued devil you. WèàšèìòìďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 12:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
I tried to unblock you mate, but they re did it. I think there is some sort of conspiracy against you. Naca (talk) 12:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
I know, I appreciate that. Just bear in mind that every oppressed minority - Jews, blacks, homosexuals, gypsies - have had these kinds of obstacles to overcome. I console myself with the thought that in the end, history despises tyrants above all else. We're on the right side of history mate. They're the people operating the gas chamber control room. We know how history judges them, and how it judges us. ProudTory (talk) 12:28, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Nottingham

Why did I think you lived in Somerset? also, Bondurant is a Nottinghamite, one more RWian and you'll have the three wise men of Gotham. SophieWilder 13:53, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

When I first edited RW, I lived in Wiltshire (at my parents' place, temporarily). Prior to that, I was living in Exeter; I think I may have chimed in once or twice when you've been talking about Totnes or Devon, so that might be the reason. I've been in Nottingham 3+ years now. WẽãšẽĩõĩďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 14:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
I missed a full stop in your reply, and misread your last line as "...so that might be the reason I've been in Nottingham 3+ years now." :) SophieWilder 14:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Some guy I've never heard of sneaked that in without prior discussion

Reasons why the Community Standards should be locked at mod-only, perhaps? Polar Bear in the Jungle Peter Tosh > Bob Marley 00:29, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Not necessarily, but more closely monitored. ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 00:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

[edit] appologies

I wanted to appologize for yesterday. I was extremly up set about work (we were given our "reduction in force" notices a week ago, and tensions here are very high) and i took it out on you. please forgive me, and chalk it up to the "walks into a bar, looking for a fight" but virtually, attitude. :-)Green mowse.pngGodot Chúc mừng năm mới 16:11, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

If you mean on the MRA talk page, I didn't take it personally. No worries, no apology necessary. I think we were both misunderstanding each other. + I do agree with most of the stuff you added to the article recently; I just disagree with some of the generalisations. Sorry to hear about work; are you actually up for redundancy or just other people at your office? ΨΣΔξΣΓΩΙÐWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 19:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Yep, I'll be there through the end of this month. they entire Firm is going away. This is not public info on my Facebook page, just cause i don't want my parents to worry. I don't' *think* you are on my FB page.  :-) MRA is one of our messes that gets created when we have 3 or 4 different "pages" or "larger ideas" trying to shove into a smaller framework. How you pull that back from the brink is what's beyond me. Again, I think making "MRA" separate (or a distinct part) from "men's rights" would really help. Green mowse.pngGodot Chúc mừng năm mới 19:54, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
That sucks about your job; hope you have other options. No, I'm not FBF with anyone from RW; I've thought about it, but mostly like to keep RW separate from my life in the real world. Re MRA, I'll add some comments on the talk page shortly, probably tomorrow now. WēāŝēīōīďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 21:21, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Feminism

The fact is that feminists claim that 1 in 3 women in the US have been raped, while 1 in 5 women were raped during the Soviet invasion of eastern Germany. The End Ian Kershaw. Page 181. ఠ_ఠ Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector 19:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

That's innumerate math. You are banned from all statistics. If every human were to die, that would be a catastrophic global event. Every human will die. Do you see the difference? Hipocrite (talk) 20:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Are you talking about everyone dying at once versus the fact that everyone will die eventually? ఠ_ఠ Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector 20:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Shocker, right? Raping 1/5 of the population over a year is very different than 1/3 of the population eventually being raped. Hipocrite (talk) 20:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
I sort of see the difference. Though they also claim that girls in college are also equally like to be raped, which mathematically is a lot closer. ఠ_ఠ Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector 20:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
(EC, reply to Inquisitor Dickhead) So what? You are lying about what feminists have said (has any feminist ever really made the "more likely than" comparison you suggest?), you accuse them of "exaggerating" rape numbers without citing any relevant statistics to support this, and you are ultimately using some irrelevant facts about atrocities in the past to trivialise & downplay the very real problem of rape in modern women's lives. Disgusting. WeaseloidWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 20:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
I personally think that rapists should still be executed for what they do. I am standing up for the suffering that rape victims suffer. By calling out attempts to trivialize that, I am defending attempts to show the problem of rape in the lives of women. ఠ_ఠ Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector 20:12, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
No, you aren't. You are trivializing and downplaying the very real problem of rape, by denying it's severity. You used an argument from incredulity, and then lied about facts to do so. Is there a reason you are here, exactly? Hipocrite (talk) 20:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
(EC, reply to Inquisitor Dickhead) Yeah, by implying they're lying or exaggerating or have it easy compared to the Nazi women of the past. Real classy. ŴêâŝêîôîďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 20:14, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
I'm not saying that they "have it easy." You are degrading the tragedy of rape, and that is disgusting that you would do that. ఠ_ఠ Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector 20:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Nah, that's what you're doing. What was your intention in introducing this red herring into the feminism article if not to invalidate legitimate concerns feminists have raised about the high incidence of rape? ωεαşεζόίďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 20:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
There is also a reality that we are some 60 years gone, and rape is defined differently now. Getting a women drukn to the point where she giggles at your toes, turning on a fan, or a box of crayons and then having sex with her cause she's too drunk to even realize what you are doing - is rape. It wasn't, just 20 years ago. Telling your wife it is "her duty" to please you IS RAPE. it wasn't before the 70's. If you are 21, and you have sex with someone 17 - that's rape today, even if she's fully consentual. that was hardly rape 40 years ago, it was normal. It's a useless comparison to make, it serves none of the arguments in making it. Green mowse.pngGodot Chúc mừng năm mới 20:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Re 17-21 - depends on the jurisdiction. However, your point stands. Hipocrite (talk) 20:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
There are so many holes in the comparison, it's really not worth picking over them one by one. Let's just make sure it doesn't find its way back into the article. WẽãšẽĩõĩďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 21:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Are you seriously accusing me of trolling for opposing the secondary victimization of rape victims?

Because that is absolutely appalling. ఠ_ఠ Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector 21:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Give it a rest. I have defended you today, but this is totally unnecessary. Stop spreading this shit all over the wiki. DamoHi 22:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
I'm accusing you of trolling for derailing valid concerns about the prevalence of rape by insisting on irrelevant & badly framed comparisons with wartime Europe. Congratulations on getting everyone to argue with you over the details though. & If you don't like being accused of concern trolling, maybe you should stop playing the "it's disgusting that you disagree with me" line. ŴêâŝêîôîďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 22:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry

Sorry about acting like an idiot. ఠ_ఠ Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Sturmkrieg Sector 02:17, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

OK, fair enough. But I still think a lot of your opinions (e.g. on rape & feminism) are rather ill-informed. WéáśéĺóíďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 13:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Another ill-tempered little mustelid for your delectation

Even men with steel hearts love to see a pine marten on the pitch. SophieWilder 13:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Wow, look at him go! Oddly, I see the Guardian has now edited out the footage of him being grabbed, since you posted this earlier. Thanks for this anyway. WẽãšẽĩõĩďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 19:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Footage of real live pine marten grabbing was obviously too upsetting for Guardian readers. SophieWilder 21:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Trolls

Exactly in what way is it illegal to meet a troll IRL? ఠ_ఠ Тод Зенос ан форфар фор 17:14, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Signature




ఠ_ఠ


ఠ_ఠ Sturmkrieg Sector Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Ordo Scharzenkommando 22:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

You could just use a plain text signature and never change it again, then nobody will ever complain about how unwieldy it is. --MikallakiM 22:45, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
I just changed it. Also, you're saying that on the page of a user who doesn't use a plain text signature. ఠ_ఠ Sturmkrieg Sector Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Ordo Scharzenkommando 22:51, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Nor is his large or annoying, something you have often received criticism on and yet keep doing. --MikallakiM 22:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Take a look at some other people's sigs, particularly the height and length; that's the accepted style of sigmaking. They emphasise the user as an individual, without yelling LOOK AT ME!!! SophieWilder 22:58, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
This discussion has attracted a group of people who can't agree that the sky is blue, yet we've all united on how ugly and annoying your signature is. Yes, Weaseloid's signature uses colors, a graphic and various fonts. However, you can scan a page without getting annoyed by the appearance of Weaseloid's signature. Yours however, is as irritating as all hell. VOXHUMANA 23:28, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Is this better? ఠ_ఠ Sturmkrieg Sector Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Ordo Scharzenkommando 04:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
No.When Roosevelt came to the land of the hummingbird, shouts of welcome were heard!. 04:15, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
(EC) Marginally so, yes, but the adjective you're looking for is "tolerable." That, it is not. Peter mqzp 04:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Try this: ఠ_ఠ Sturmkrieg Sector Inquisitor Sasha Ehrenstein des Ordo Scharzenkommando When Roosevelt came to the land of the hummingbird, shouts of welcome were heard!. 04:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Lose the border, the grey fill and most of the unnecessary words and you might have something. Put in a link to the talk page. VOXHUMANA 04:19, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Ok, I'll work with that. Although I don't think a talk page link. I don't see the point of it. It pretty much renders user pages irrelevant when people can bypass it directly; no one is going to see it otherwise. It's not hard to click the talk tab. Inquisitor Ehrenstein (talk) 05:13, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Streamlining the process is a bad thing? (talk to a) Nihilist 05:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
"I dont see why the way pretty much everybody does it here should be followed, it seems silly". Thats great, but its considered the way to do signatures, you should learn that while trimming all that cruft off . --MikallakiM 05:36, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Here's an easy solution, we'll just refactor their signature until they come up with one that isn't as annoying as all fuck. [[User:Inquisitor Ehrenstein|Inquisitor Ehrenstein]] [[User_talk:Inquisitor Ehrenstein|(talk)]] will do the job nicely. VOXHUMANA 05:47, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Lose the grey box, for a start. And please keep the link to your talk page. Forcing people to go through your userpage makes you look like an attention seeker. SophieWilder 11:06, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Ninja vs Ninjas

The rest of those sorts of pages—bots, techs etc—all seem to be at the pluralised version of the name for some reason. Peter mqzp 05:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Fine, whatever. The user groups seem to be named arbitrarily, some in the singular, some plurals. WěǎšěǐǒǐďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 05:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Further arbitrariness is probably fine then. Peter mqzp 05:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] If you think that external links are too promoting

I can always take several extra steps out of my way for your benefit to take screenshots and upload those to show what websites look like. Then again, all the links here and on all MediaWiki websites are rel=nofollow by default, so such links wouldn't provide any SEO benefit anyway. –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk) 17:35, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] User:I am FED UP with the Democrat Party's leftist commie pro-porno, pro-fornication, pro-Islamic-TRASH agenda

Is it you? –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 19:54, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

No, it's a regular troll who creates ridiculously over-the-top usernames. SophieWilder 19:57, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
He's got previous. Don't bother about him. SophieWilder 19:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
I see. Weaseloid removed the Poe's Law template. Is this guy serious? His userpage seems like Poe. –Inquisitor Sasha (Talk | contribs | block) 20:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Ferrets on steroids

[2]--"Shut up, Brx." 17:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Awful. WéáśéĺóíďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 17:36, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Race

I was trying to find a way to separate what biologists mean when they use the term as opposed to a more everyday meaning. Also, the way the whole thing was constructed was horrible as it went back and forth between talking about species and the specific human connotation. Check it out and see if it's any better. If the thunder don't get you/Then the lightning will. 23:13, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Evolution

Your were right this didn't fit in the article an Pope Francis except as background information. Why didn't you add it to the article on the Roman Catholic Church? If I hadn't spotted it good material would have been lost. Proxima Centauri (talk) 09:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Color@TF

I'm aware that quotes are a tricky business, but I would suggest that you refrain from using colors to mark them. Some readers are colour blind, some even completely blind, and they would no see the difference. Thanks! --193.254.155.48 (talk) 13:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

I find green a soothing color. Reminds me of the walls of various government facilities where I've passed many an idle hour. 69.50.55.110 (talk) 14:10, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Personally

I think it's funny how cat food might be advertised as having been grilled, or that it comes with gravy. My cat just finished his "Sea Captain's Entree," which the ingredients helpfully label as consisting of "fish" (just fish, not any specific kind of fish), animal liver, and meat byproducts. You have to wander if he gives a fuck about whether or not his food is nautically themed or not. I like to think my kitty prefers fish-based filets, but in all probability he chows it down just the same as anything else I give him, indifferent to such nuances as gravy, parsley, or poaching.--"Shut up, Brx." 01:50, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Do you value liberty?

Where will your loyalties be when the revolution breaks out? I've always pictured you as a member of the ancien regime, but when freedom comes will you stand for the interests of the people, or for the powerful?

MARCUSCICERO

No one here values liberty. This is the Imperium of Man, we have no need for your silly ideas of "liberty"--Token Conservative (talk) 23:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

[edit] Cat and marmot wrestling

--"Shut up, Brx." 22:25, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Cute. Thanks Brx. WéáśéĺóíďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 22:45, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Toolbox
support