We Surround Them
|Hail to the Chief?|
|Persons of interest|
We Surround Them is a tract published by Glenn Beck in April 2009. While this sounds like something from a Calvin and Hobbes comic strip, it's supposed to rally conservatives to oppose Barack Obama, because that's really about the only original idea the GOP has had since the invasion of Iraq.
Beck unveiled this campaign in a television broadcast on Friday, March 13, 2009. He encouraged "cell groups" to hold watching parties to view the broadcast.
Presented here, along with rebuttals, are Glenn Beck's "Nine Principles" that can be used to see if you share the same values as him. It is implied that if you agree with these principles that you are not only a conservative, but that you are opposed to a 4.6 percent income tax increase in the top marginal bracket of people making over $250,000 a year.
 The Nine Principles
 1. America is good.
Wait, does that mean that America is always good? In that everything America does is always good? That America doesn't make mistakes in foreign policy, or step across the line in human rights issues? This goes back to the argument presented by conservative pundits that citizens who disagree with the invasion of Iraq, with torture, with imprisoning people without due process are "bad Americans."
This question is also something of a non sequitur, as America is an abstract concept, unless you are specifically talking about the land America occupies.
 2. I believe in God and He is the Center of my Life.
Is this required to be a good American? Is this required to be Republican? This is a huge looming issue for the GOP, and it will be interesting to see how this plays out. During the Bush II years the GOP became an increasingly religious party, and if the evangelical Christian branch of the party stays in control, they can look forward to many more years of losing elections.
 3. I must always try to be a more honest person than I was yesterday.
Well, of course. We agree. But what does this have to do with whether or not one opposes Obama? And shouldn't good Christians always be honest? It's not like it's hard to be completely honest. Also, how much more honest should one be compared to the day before? As much as the limits of the partitions used in a Riemann Integral? This statement needs clarification.
Unless you are gay, or single, or unmarried by choice, or divorced, or under 18. Is a "family" the only valid mode of living now? Does it somehow confer special rights that others don't have?
Also, authority on what? Your children? Yourself? Agricultural subsidies? The war on terror? This statement needs clarification.
Does this mean that Beck is pro-choice on abortion? After all, if your spouse and you are the ultimate authority, and not the government...
 5. If you break the law you pay the penalty. Justice is blind and no one is above it.
Except for Scooter Libby. And white collar criminals. And Bush administration torturers. And Dick Cheney. And..... Didn't he just say that my spouse and I are the ultimate authority, and not the government?
 6. I have a right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, but there is no guarantee of equal results.
What, is government forcing anyone to be charitable? And if God is the center of your life via a church, there may be a little artifact called "tithe", which is pretty much mandatory charitable efforts. As such, a Godly government would seem to be out. Perhaps Mr. Beck is referring to the idea of redistributing wealth via progressive taxation; perhaps he is referring to the publicly-funded social safety net. Whatever the case, he needs to clarify.
Alternatively it looks like he may be trying to join the tax protester movement.
See 1. Wasn't it called unpatriotic to question George W. Bush when he was president? Wasn't the argument "all Americans should support their president", or does that only apply to Republican presidents?
 9. The government works for me. I do not answer to them, they answer to me.
Fascinating. In November 2008, millions of Americans spoke at the polls, and said that the current government was not working for them nor answering to them, and voted for a change. Wouldn't following the will of the people be to support the policies of President Obama? Oh do let us guess; he didn't legitimately win the election, he won because of affirmative action, or because the Zionist Occupation Government pulled some strings, or something.
 The Twelve Values
- Hard Work
- Personal Responsibility
A Scout is "trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent". Nothing new here, except moving "reverent" up to second place, which sort of misses the point; by putting it last, the Scout Law honors it as a benediction, as it were. What this has to do with whether one opposes Obama is anyone's guess, especially considering that "hope" has been added. The differences between these two lists need to be analyzed in more detail. Interestingly, "loyalty" and "obedience" are completely removed, despite all the paeans to "patriotism" above. Can't be loyal to Obama, or obey him, eh? And, actually, all the "be nice to other people" virtues are gone except for "charity."
Some think that sincerity is more or less the same as honesty. Some scholarly analysis holds that sincerity is bullshit. Either way, the "sincerity" entry lacks significant value, leading to the assumption that the symbolism of twelve values was more important than the content of the list. Also, reverence? Towards what?
On the positive side, it does not require a very great stretching of one's personal virtue of charity to believe that although Mr Beck does not specifically include cleanliness among his Twelve Values, he does still expect his followers to bathe.
 See also
- W. Cleon Skousen, whose 1981 book The Five Thousand Year Leap appears to be the basis of Beck's list of values and principles.
- ↑ Glenn Beck We Surround Them. (www.glennbeck.com, 2nd April 2009)
- ↑ Of course, it all goes back to Bill Clinton who said "It depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is."
- ↑ Further arguments about what exactly is goodness comes in.
- ↑ ORLY?
- ↑ This is, of course, an allusion, since there is no such thing as a unit of honesty. (or is there?)
- ↑ Some people take any inequality of results as proof that some people are being denied life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness, but this is a non sequitur.
- ↑ Of course we do not exclude the possibility that opposing one or more individuals brings someone happiness.
- ↑ Well, except a government run by Jesus who made it a condition of discipleship that one should sell all his/her possessions and give them to the poor. (See Matthew 19:21, Mark 10:21, Luke 12:33, Luke 18:22).
- ↑ Apparently that does not apply to George H.W. Bush, Richard Nixon and possibly Gerald Ford (and that's only the guys after World War II); maybe a better classification would be "intellectually impaired" presidents?
- ↑ Frankfurt, Harry, On Bullshit, the last sentence on the ultimate page; full text on Archive.org here