Conservapedia Talk:Newcomer's Guide

From RationalWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Seriously, add yourself)
(Seriously, add yourself: spelling)
Line 29: Line 29:
:Instead of berating Ames or whoever, you should really be thanking [[User:E.Wig]] for [http://www.rationalwiki.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia%3ANewcomer%27s_Guide&diff=20868&oldid=20839 restoring your edit about yourself].  That's the sort of thing a real friend would do, and probably deserves some credit. --[[User:Kels|Kels]] 13:38, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
:Instead of berating Ames or whoever, you should really be thanking [[User:E.Wig]] for [http://www.rationalwiki.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia%3ANewcomer%27s_Guide&diff=20868&oldid=20839 restoring your edit about yourself].  That's the sort of thing a real friend would do, and probably deserves some credit. --[[User:Kels|Kels]] 13:38, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
-
*Berating AmesG?  Maybe you have a language difficulty?  I was most certainly not berating Ames. However the pack mentality here doesn't give users of a different idealogy a chance.  Proof of that is the blatant fact you have so few here, and cannot attract them, unless you make a sock and pretend to be "different", lol. --[[User:E.Wig|Ë.]] 13:45, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
+
*Berating AmesG?  TK was most certainly not berating Ames. However the pack here doesn't give users of a different idealogy much of a chance.  Proof of that is the blatant fact we have so few here, and cannot attract them, unless you make a sock and pretend to be "different", lol. I don't want any thanks from TK, thank you very much! That is another reason so few want to stick around. --[[User:E.Wig|Ë.]] 13:45, 26 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:47, 26 June 2007

Help!

I've put it on watch for the moment. Got another fairly time-consuming RW article coming up today, but I'll try to make a few edits here, too (assuming that my messed-up sleep cycle doesn't screw me over on the way). --Sid 06:01, 24 June 2007 (CDT)

Everyone contribute!-AmesG 01:39, 25 June 2007 (CDT)
How many people do we want on the RationalWiki members? Should I include myself? ɧєɭıסş-get sunburn! 02:23, 25 June 2007 (CDT)
AmesG, nice beginning! Could you at least be more subtle/clever at trying to cast suspicion on me? I am soooo friendly to RW! Please don't confuse a willingness to chat with political/tactical agreement. --TK/MyTalk 15:14, 25 June 2007 (CDT)

Everyone should add themselves especially Helios.AmesG 15:48, 25 June 2007 (CDT)

"Everyone should add themselves?" Add themselves? I don't recall adding myself. Now I am totally confused! But I suppose it was a friendly attempt by Sid & AmesG to self-describe me in a "friendly" manner, since I am a member here and all? That is so kind! So they will not object to me contributing my own additions to the other users descriptions, right? --TK/MyTalk 15:58, 25 June 2007 (CDT)
Save a goat, starve a troll!
Lipson and several other editors quit trying to moderate the articles and instead started their own website, RationalWiki.com. From there, they monitor Conservapedia. And — by their own admission — engage in acts of cyber-vandalism. Notice...not attributed to PalMD. To "they". --DoxXox-DawkT0wk 17:07, 25 June 2007 (CDT)
TK, please learn how to read article histories. You would have noticed that I had not made any edits to it before you started complaining here. My only two edits happened a few minutes ago, long after your edit to PalMD's entry. Just a friendly heads-up for the future. --Sid 04:56, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
  • Sid, perhaps its your change in hours challenging you. I didn't say a word about you editing, I merely addressed the two who actually seem to have started the article. --TK/MyTalk 05:49, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
Let me see. My complete involvement (prior to my two extremely recent edits and the chat with you) was the comment at the top, in which I said I might help out later because Ames said he could use help. Ever since then, I didn't have a good chance to help and thus made zero edits (until recently). How does this translate to "Sid and Ames start the article"? --Sid 05:58, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
  • If you saw anything, other than your usual desire to be an ass, Sid, it would be a miracle, no? Since you know I was looking at the page history for this page, not the article page, and was mistaken, why not just say that instead of typing away to do what? Oh, wait, I forgot! It is your way, and that was the reason you were blocked so many times on CP, and I suspect other sites as well, lol. But I still love ya, Sid! --TK/MyTalk 12:43, 26 June 2007 (CDT)

Seriously, add yourself

Please add info about yourself!!!-AmesG 00:44, 26 June 2007 (CDT)

  • Sorry, AmesG, but as a Less Than user here, it has already been decided by some here that nothing I contribute will be allowed to stand. Just another example of Liberal Deceit. --TK/MyTalk 05:46, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
Instead of berating Ames or whoever, you should really be thanking User:E.Wig for restoring your edit about yourself. That's the sort of thing a real friend would do, and probably deserves some credit. --Kels 13:38, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
  • Berating AmesG? TK was most certainly not berating Ames. However the pack here doesn't give users of a different idealogy much of a chance. Proof of that is the blatant fact we have so few here, and cannot attract them, unless you make a sock and pretend to be "different", lol. I don't want any thanks from TK, thank you very much! That is another reason so few want to stick around. --Ë. 13:45, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
Personal tools
support