Difference between revisions of "User talk:Lumenos/Abortion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] ([[User talk:Lumenos|talk]]) 18:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] ([[User talk:Lumenos|talk]]) 18:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Are you talking to yourself? | ||
+ | |||
+ | :I'm very sorry to interrupt this private conversation, but if your arguments are based on the premise that unborn human beings are not persons (you see, only 0,01 - 0,1 out of all abortions are done because of rape, this is a ''very'' minor issue) then you should discuss it (perhaps as a rebuttal to "personhood" section in my essay) instead of simply putting quotation marks around these words. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 20:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:23, 8 June 2010
Earthland has posted some right highfalutin musings that sound curiously similar to those Christian terrorists. I was wondering if someone might elaborate on how far they are willing to take the notion that zygote/embryo = person:
Lumenos (talk) 18:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
- Are you talking to yourself?
- I'm very sorry to interrupt this private conversation, but if your arguments are based on the premise that unborn human beings are not persons (you see, only 0,01 - 0,1 out of all abortions are done because of rape, this is a very minor issue) then you should discuss it (perhaps as a rebuttal to "personhood" section in my essay) instead of simply putting quotation marks around these words. --Earthland (talk) 20:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC)