Difference between revisions of "User talk:David Gerard"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by David Gerard (Talk) to last version by Nx)
(MC is not a member of the community, Earthland is a single-issue advocate/troll who considers community rules an avenue for exploits and, as such, is a spammer)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== No ==
 
== No ==
  
You won't revert my edits. It was all Bob/Jack who begun to archive my edits from his talk page two seconds after I had written them, so why shouldn't I be allowed to do the same with his comments? Seriously. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 11:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
+
<small><small><small><small><small>You won't revert my edits. It was all Bob/Jack who begun to archive my edits from his talk page two seconds after I had written them, so why shouldn't I be allowed to do the same with his comments? Seriously. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 11:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)</small></small></small></small></small>
 
:Actually Earthland is right. --&nbsp;[[User:Nx|<span style="color:teal">'''''Nx'''''</span>]]&nbsp;/&nbsp;[[User talk:Nx|''talk'']] 12:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
:Actually Earthland is right. --&nbsp;[[User:Nx|<span style="color:teal">'''''Nx'''''</span>]]&nbsp;/&nbsp;[[User talk:Nx|''talk'']] 12:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
  
 
== Just something I need to say ==
 
== Just something I need to say ==
  
At first I could have accused you of being a hypocrite. After all, nobody has ever sued Bob for immediately archiving my edits, even when I reverted his edits. (Similarly, many things become "truth" just as soon as someone else than me says it, until that point it is something "completely laughable" and even "couldn't be farther from the truth").
+
<small><small><small><small><small>At first I could have accused you of being a hypocrite. After all, nobody has ever sued Bob for immediately archiving my edits, even when I reverted his edits. (Similarly, many things become "truth" just as soon as someone else than me says it, until that point it is something "completely laughable" and even "couldn't be farther from the truth").
  
 
However, there wasn't anything hypocritical about bringing Bob's comments back from the archive ''after'' you had just ''deleted'' (not archived) my comment on your talk page. Like, nobody is that openly hypocritical. It was an obvious, but nevertheless blatant and childish attempt to make me angry. God, you must really hate me. After all, if I were just another clown/troll then you should simply ignore me. I honestly don't know how come that I am the target of such hate, since I don't even remember that I would've ever directly talked to you.
 
However, there wasn't anything hypocritical about bringing Bob's comments back from the archive ''after'' you had just ''deleted'' (not archived) my comment on your talk page. Like, nobody is that openly hypocritical. It was an obvious, but nevertheless blatant and childish attempt to make me angry. God, you must really hate me. After all, if I were just another clown/troll then you should simply ignore me. I honestly don't know how come that I am the target of such hate, since I don't even remember that I would've ever directly talked to you.
Line 12: Line 12:
 
There is nothing left but to wonder how could people here seriously "accuse" poor little Tweety for being 12 years old. 12 is far more than RW's average.  
 
There is nothing left but to wonder how could people here seriously "accuse" poor little Tweety for being 12 years old. 12 is far more than RW's average.  
  
--[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 16:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
+
--[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 16:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)</small></small></small></small></small>
 
:[[image:wtf.gif]] {{User:Weaseloid/sigred}} 18:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
:[[image:wtf.gif]] {{User:Weaseloid/sigred}} 18:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
::He's 17. He's only just heard that thinking exists, let alone joined-up thinking. He could do with a fun time on [[LessWrong]], since we're too dumb for him - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 18:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
::He's 17. He's only just heard that thinking exists, let alone joined-up thinking. He could do with a fun time on [[LessWrong]], since we're too dumb for him - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 18:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
:::''"He's only just heard that thinking exists"'' your words speak of great maturity indeed. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 19:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
+
:::<small><small><small><small><small>''"He's only just heard that thinking exists"'' your words speak of great maturity indeed. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 19:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)</small></small></small></small></small>
 
::::You're 17, you've only just heard that joined-up thinking exists - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 19:43, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
::::You're 17, you've only just heard that joined-up thinking exists - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 19:43, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
::::I can't take you seriously because you're a single-issue troll. You have no interest in the site, you have no interest in its mission, you are a single-issue troll. You've reached the point where the difference between "troll" and "advocate" is meaningless. If you had any use here, you'd be contributing anywhere other than on your single droning monotone topic. You don't. Therefore you are a waste of bytes - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 20:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
::::I can't take you seriously because you're a single-issue troll. You have no interest in the site, you have no interest in its mission, you are a single-issue troll. You've reached the point where the difference between "troll" and "advocate" is meaningless. If you had any use here, you'd be contributing anywhere other than on your single droning monotone topic. You don't. Therefore you are a waste of bytes - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 20:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
::::You should have made this comment on the Administrative Abuse page, my dear. Talking on one topic does not make me troll. However, if it does interest you, I have made other contributions as well, as it is mentioned on my [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:Earthland#Contributions user page]. There once seemed to be quite a [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Debate:Block_Earthland_permanently%3F consensus] that I am not a troll. I think you have difficulties with reading, and oh... wishes give you big eyes. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 20:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
+
::::<small><small><small><small><small>You should have made this comment on the Administrative Abuse page, my dear. Talking on one topic does not make me troll. However, if it does interest you, I have made other contributions as well, as it is mentioned on my [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:Earthland#Contributions user page]. There once seemed to be quite a [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Debate:Block_Earthland_permanently%3F consensus] that I am not a troll. I think you have difficulties with reading, and oh... wishes give you big eyes. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 20:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)</small></small></small></small></small>
 
:::::As I noted, you are not a member of the community and, notably, have no detectable interest in being one - only pursuing a single issue and attempting to exploit local rules to continue pursuing a single issue - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 20:45, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::As I noted, you are not a member of the community and, notably, have no detectable interest in being one - only pursuing a single issue and attempting to exploit local rules to continue pursuing a single issue - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 20:45, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
  
 
== New section ==
 
== New section ==
  
(Just thought that you'll notice)
+
<small><small><small><small><small>(Just thought that you'll notice)
  
:::::[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEarthland&diff=519997&oldid=519995 Toast says it]. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 19:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
+
:::::[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEarthland&diff=519997&oldid=519995 Toast says it]. --[[User:Earthland|Earthland]] ([[User talk:Earthland|talk]]) 19:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC)</small></small></small></small></small>
  
 
== Death threat? ==
 
== Death threat? ==
Line 34: Line 34:
 
:::Plausibly he's talking about site politics. i.e., I wouldn't personally consider this worth an ISP report - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 21:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
:::Plausibly he's talking about site politics. i.e., I wouldn't personally consider this worth an ISP report - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 21:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
::::Honestly, I think he wants to have sex with you.  But it is a bit vague, as such innuendo often are. --[[User:Kels|Kels]] ([[User talk:Kels|talk]]) 21:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
::::Honestly, I think he wants to have sex with you.  But it is a bit vague, as such innuendo often are. --[[User:Kels|Kels]] ([[User talk:Kels|talk]]) 21:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 
I will admit that my rhetoric gets the better of me sometimes. Sorry if thats how it appeared. 'Waiting in the long grass' is a commong UK/Irish political term... IE, Brown waiting in the long grass for Blair.
 
 
I will take this as a providential sign that I should take an RW break for a while. My trolling has been pretty hardcore recently.
 
 
Sorry! [[Special:Contributions/86.40.207.73|86.40.207.73]] ([[User talk:86.40.207.73|talk]]) 21:53, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 22:33, 5 June 2010

No

You won't revert my edits. It was all Bob/Jack who begun to archive my edits from his talk page two seconds after I had written them, so why shouldn't I be allowed to do the same with his comments? Seriously. --Earthland (talk) 11:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Actually Earthland is right. -- Nx / talk 12:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Just something I need to say

At first I could have accused you of being a hypocrite. After all, nobody has ever sued Bob for immediately archiving my edits, even when I reverted his edits. (Similarly, many things become "truth" just as soon as someone else than me says it, until that point it is something "completely laughable" and even "couldn't be farther from the truth").

However, there wasn't anything hypocritical about bringing Bob's comments back from the archive after you had just deleted (not archived) my comment on your talk page. Like, nobody is that openly hypocritical. It was an obvious, but nevertheless blatant and childish attempt to make me angry. God, you must really hate me. After all, if I were just another clown/troll then you should simply ignore me. I honestly don't know how come that I am the target of such hate, since I don't even remember that I would've ever directly talked to you.

There is nothing left but to wonder how could people here seriously "accuse" poor little Tweety for being 12 years old. 12 is far more than RW's average.

--Earthland (talk) 16:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Wtf.gif WëäŝëïöïďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 18:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
He's 17. He's only just heard that thinking exists, let alone joined-up thinking. He could do with a fun time on LessWrong, since we're too dumb for him - David Gerard (talk) 18:54, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
"He's only just heard that thinking exists" your words speak of great maturity indeed. --Earthland (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
You're 17, you've only just heard that joined-up thinking exists - David Gerard (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
I can't take you seriously because you're a single-issue troll. You have no interest in the site, you have no interest in its mission, you are a single-issue troll. You've reached the point where the difference between "troll" and "advocate" is meaningless. If you had any use here, you'd be contributing anywhere other than on your single droning monotone topic. You don't. Therefore you are a waste of bytes - David Gerard (talk) 20:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
You should have made this comment on the Administrative Abuse page, my dear. Talking on one topic does not make me troll. However, if it does interest you, I have made other contributions as well, as it is mentioned on my user page. There once seemed to be quite a consensus that I am not a troll. I think you have difficulties with reading, and oh... wishes give you big eyes. --Earthland (talk) 20:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
As I noted, you are not a member of the community and, notably, have no detectable interest in being one - only pursuing a single issue and attempting to exploit local rules to continue pursuing a single issue - David Gerard (talk) 20:45, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

New section

(Just thought that you'll notice)

Toast says it. --Earthland (talk) 19:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Death threat?

Did he just threaten to kill you? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 21:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Dude, I tangle with Scientology for fun - David Gerard (talk) 21:12, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Yes, but if he's going to be making death threats, then we need to stop treating him like just another troublemaker. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 21:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Plausibly he's talking about site politics. i.e., I wouldn't personally consider this worth an ISP report - David Gerard (talk) 21:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Honestly, I think he wants to have sex with you. But it is a bit vague, as such innuendo often are. --Kels (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)