User talk:Human

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Human.gif

  • The 2008 election night party is enshrined at this dump. Thank you all for popping in, it was a blast!
  • The May 20/21 2009 RationalWiki second birthday party is here. There may still be some stains on the carpet, so be careful.
  • Somewhere around here I usually express my preference for avoiding table-tennis conversations. If I muck up your talk page, I'll stalk you until you reply there. If you defame my lovely estate of ones and zeros here, I'll add some random non sequitur to it here. Cheers! ħumanUser talk:Human
  • Threads over seven days old are automatically archived by an irrational "bot"
  • Here is my special archive for sticky threads.
This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page: Archive list
See the history of vandalism to this article
Bunny.gif

You have been smitten by a bunny in accordance with the community standards for... no real reason. Feel free to revert this odd edit.


Debinning

Linuxianthegreat should be vandal binned as he was only blocked for an hour and is the sock of a clear and known vandal. - π 12:23, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

And he also seems to have no trouble creating sockpuppets. Many of them, from what I can see? ħumanUser talk:Human 12:25, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
So why does he need them unbanned then? - π 12:26, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Unbinned, not unbanned. Because it is pointless and I am sick of fascists on this site binning/banning people for silly reasons. ħumanUser talk:Human 12:30, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
It is just as pointless unbinning obvious vandal socks. You accuses David of power-tripping but this is just as bad, "oh look at me I can revert all you bins because I am the final arbitrator". Whatever, I don't care either way. - π 12:35, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Your valiant defence of worthless trolls against mere users who aren't here just to be fuckwits is noble and admirable - David Gerard (talk) 12:37, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Wow, that takes me back. Ah, those Halcyon days when Human was calling me a fascist instead. Go bravely, young man, I pass the torch to you! --Kels (talk) 14:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
People use that freaking F-bomb far too much. It dilutes the actual meaning of the word, and anyway, you can't be fascist on RW because the system is set up to encourage anti-authoritarian behaviour and there's no way one individual could realistic enforce a "fascist" regime. Scarlet A.pngsshole 14:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
That's quitter talk, mister! --Kels (talk) 14:55, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
What are you, a FASCIST? - David Gerard (talk) 15:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
No, YOU'RE the fascist! Scarlet A.pngsshole 15:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
This is such self congratulatory backslapping from the mediocre intellects that reverted this site into a parody of rational debate and enlightenment. Gerard is an utter and absolute wanker, he is a despicable person, beneath my contempt. He is a cocksure, wikipedian geek with an authority complex intent on getting his way on just about everything. He ignores the counsel of his colleagues but continues the nonetheless the myopic quest to increase regulations on this site (Even though 2/3 of the member base is devotedly opposed to increased regulation)
How this utter bastard gets through the net time and time again I'll never know. 86.40.209.27 (talk) 16:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
I knew there was something I liked about him. --Kels (talk) 16:29, 11 July 2010 (UTC)