Welcome to TK's Talk Page. You Can IM Me--Exculpatory1 On AIM.
|
| This user will be away from RationalWiki for extended periods from time-to-time, due to its unwelcoming climate. They are in hopes of change here. Therefore, they may not respond to queries until they return unless you email or IM. This page has been accessed over 5,660 times!!
Archive #1 +
Give the guy a break already.
He's been blocked, just let bygones be bygones. --Linus(plot evil tech) 16:57, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
- Gee, it's rough on him, isn't it? He got blocked for one minute and two minutes, for good reasons. He also contributed an act of unfunny vandalism and is going to get blocked for one hour for this, with the edit comment: "Fuck you, Jtl:Terrorist and Blackmailer". In violation of personal attacks, and at least three people already putting that stale discussion on the talk page, where jtl noted: "I'll consider any further attempts to move conversation from this page back to the article page to be non-funny vandalism, and will block accordingly. --jtltalk 15:24, 15 June 2007 (CDT)". One hour starting after I save this. humanbe in 19:11, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
- NM, he's being a bastard again. --Linus(plot evil tech) 20:56, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
5,000 Views!
See you are popular! -Ĭ₠ŴΣĐĝё 18:58, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
They can't survive without you
You are the most popular person here! Bohdan 00:27, 16 June 2007 (CDT)
- Did you like your balloons? G
dlessLiberal 00:38, 16 June 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, coming from you, Godless, I can't tell you just how much they mean! Of course you will be burning in the eternal fires of hell, so no balloons there, so I will share them with you here! :D Thanks, Bohdan. You know your shit from Shinola, don't you! Ice! I am so flattered! You do know there won't be any keyboards where you will end up, right? :p Okay, busy next couple of weeks, so much as I enjoy your company...adios, until next time. I will make an extra effort look in again soon! --TK/MyTalk 00:49, 16 June 2007 (CDT)
- I'll take the balloons with me. I bet they pop around all those flames. I'm out, goodnight. G
dlessLiberal 00:55, 16 June 2007 (CDT)
Hey Bohdan, how are the pageviews on CP going without the RationalWiki crowd around? I hear they're ... not so good.-AmesG 00:57, 16 June 2007 (CDT)
- Shows what a Mocking Deceitful Liberal like you knows. According to Glorious Leader Aschlafly, the weekly pageviews have increased from 10,000 to 8,000! (Let's see who gets that reference...) --Gulik 04:47, 18 June 2007 (CDT) (Not TK)
- Only proves that some CP editors more equal than others, yes? God's peed Babel fishÅЯ†ђŮŖ ÐΣй†Now look here! 06:15, 18 June 2007 (CDT)
- "THIS SITE IS GROWING RAPIDLY!!! LMAO! --Ë. 05:57, 18 June 2007 (CDT)
Another block
A three hour block for this edit; personal attacks are not welcome here. --jtltalk 13:17, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Sorry, I was in meetings. Something happen? :p I wonder if I am allowed to demand that Jtl prove my comments were an attack, instead of being factual? --TK/MyTalk 14:06, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
Actually I think it would require you citing your quotes if they are facts; otherwise they're to be taken as attacks or opinions. :-P Jrssr5 14:12, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- It's the Conservative school of discussion. TK gets to make insults (Uh, I mean... uh... "claims") and the other side has to prove that the claims are wrong. --Sid 14:20, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Did TK really ask for a notarized photo of my penis alongside a ruler? --jtltalk 14:27, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Ok, folks, if we are forcing him to keep this page archived, let's not pollute it while he's gone. :) --PalMD-yada yada 14:28, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Doc, while your point is very well taken, you realize jtl was addressing the exact issue at hand (sorry!), right? Or, at least, the least relevant one. humanbe in 14:42, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- I'm sympathetic to that, it's just that we ask people to preserve their talk page, and we have sort of hijacked this one for the (good) discussion. IMHO, not trying to start sometin'.--PalMD-yada yada 14:46, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Should we start an article about the size of jtl's ummm ... goods so we can have a talk page? Jrssr5 14:47, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- What I am saying is that if someone wants to block another, they should have proof, and be able to supply evidence that whatever is said, is true, since they are the one with the "power". I'm just pleased as punch to have forced you guys to abandon your original no block policy! Hell you wouldn't even block a bonafide Nazi, but will block someone as hated as me for saying someone has a small dick. ROFLMFAO! And that whole authoritarian rule about forced archiving really is worthy of some ideological nutter. Where else is it enforced? Nowhere. Not even China or North Korea. Its sole reason for being is to provide fodder for the existing elite power structure, same as anyplace else. (Damn edit conflicts! sorry Doc! --TK/MyTalk 14:55, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Actually, truth of a statement does not make it more polite. I have a big nose, it's true, but you still shouldn't call me on it in public. Oh, and my above statements are void, as TK is back to talk and defend himself. Anyway, just cuz someone is an asshole, doesn't mean we should let people call them that openly.--PalMD-yada yada 14:52, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Aren't people able to edit their own talk page while they're blocked? I remember that being pointed out as unusual on CP where talk pages get blocked so the person has no public way to defend themselves. --Kels 14:53, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- That's CPs way of keeping dissent down and make them look like they're always in the right (pun sorta intended). If no one complains there's nothing wrong! Jrssr5 15:17, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Jrssr, the "truth" still remains, that any user on CP can delete all content from their talk or user pages, and no one gives a flying crap. They might be locked and deleted when someone is perma banned, but while they are there, sysops do not edit, archive or bother them, unless in highly unusual cases. Please feel free to find out for yourself. --TK/MyTalk 16:34, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, people can edit the discussion page with their name on it, while blocked, anywhere, I have been told by Ed Poor. It isn't their talk page, if the community insists on ownership of it. It is merely "a" discussion page with their name on it, to be accurate. Of course because of that, the power hungry elite here moved the discussion to another, more or less hidden page, to discuss it. That is because Liberal minds are small minds, and cannot stand disagreement with their dictates. So, they seek to exclude others who have a different POV. And it is proven each and every day here. :D --TK/MyTalk 14:57, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- tl;dr XD --Kels 15:08, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Oh, yes, I see...moved to disallow input from the banished! Just like they claim CP does! Ok, I got it finally! Block then discuss the "issue" in a quiet, back water area, where such pesky things as another POV isn't allowed because of the block! And no link to it! How transparent can you guys get? How much more pedantic and predictable can you be? ROFL! --TK/MyTalk 16:30, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- It's amazing how much sense that didn't make. 0.o --Kels 16:37, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- "Hell you wouldn't even block a bonafide Nazi, but will block someone as hated as me..." as of yet thats my favorite RW moment. Tolerance gone wild. Isn't it ironic how the RW crowd criticised the length of a block for antisemitism at CP[1], and then they allow a Nazi who made pages such as "evil Jew" and inserted the work kike into articles to refer to Jews to remain on their site?Bohdan 16:39, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Exactly! What we have learned here, from the Syops, is that a Nazi is more liked and tolerated than someone who is Conservative, telling a proven blackmailer and terrorist, he has a small dick and a shitty mind! Amazing! Attacks on Jews = okay on RW, attacks on sysops = bad. Hahahhaaah!! --TK/MyTalk 16:50, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Um, guys? I've been following this fairly closely (fascinating exercise in sociology/psychology), and have seen accusations of blackmail and terrorism, but NO evidence, much less proof. So, where could I find that? MyaR 16:59, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- For the record, I consider the "proven blackmailer and terrorist" bit worthy of another block, no matter who it's directed at. And further, I'll once again point out that neither is true and you've offered no proof of either. --jtltalk 17:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- But the Nazi user didn't deserve a block? Bohdan 17:02, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- User:NeoNazi was blocked, twice, first for 2 hours and then an infinite block which was rescinded after about an hour and forty-five minutes. And if he came back and repeated his offenses, he'd get ever-increasing blocks. TK here started off with one-minute blocks, and has worked himself up; his next one should be for five hours. Remember, Bohdan, TK is really good at making claims and really poor at proving them. --jtltalk 17:06, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Really, Jtl? And would you please post my block number? It was 3. So how many blocks did the Nazi get? And me getting more time blocked than a filfthy anti-semite Nazi, says what about you, blackmailer? I bet that little dick of yours gets soooo hard blocking doesn't it? --TK/MyTalk 17:20, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- What is this fascination you have with his penis anyhow? --Kels 17:27, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Somewhere between 6 and 8, depending on how you count the unblocks. Should I also try to total up the number of times you should have been blocked and weren't? And I think you just earned yourself another one, before the last one was even put in place. --jtltalk 17:23, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- (Hope you're finding this at least mildly entertaining, jtl. I am. Just proving the need for a rational response, not that it seems to do any good, at least on the level of the individual.) MyaR 17:26, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- You don't seem to have any more success getting evidence from him than I do. This edit got summarily deleted, and this one just never got answered.
- It won't do any good, because that's the point of trolling. It has nothing to do with rationality, just with trying to push buttons. Any attempt at a logical, sensible response will be met with non-sequiteurs, abuse, or illogic, as we've seen on this page many a time. It is kinda funny to watch, though. --Kels 17:42, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Fine by me! Enjoy beating off with that puny meat of yours, terrorist. So affirmed by the LA Times! All you can do is introduce into one argument more un-provable information about other times, when your generosity didn't allow me to be blocked? Hahahahah! What a disgusting piece of shit you are, Nazi! --TK/MyTalk 17:28, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- For Christ's sake, will somebody just give him that block and get it over with, already? Sheesh. I swear, the quality of my lulz coming from this site has taken a sharp downturn recently. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 17:33, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Yey, trying to make other people look bad by, hmmm, trying to make yourself look like you're paranoid and delusional? I don't get the logic, but I'm entertained. Mmmm, drama popcorn. MyaR 17:34, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Just curious, did the nazi editors pages give you quality lulz? I believe it was called evil jew...Bohdan 17:35, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Well, let's see, said Nazi user made 44 edits over the course of an hour and a half, and was banned twice in that period. And hasn't been back since that day. Would you like me to go back through the logs for various TK abuse? I guarantee it's more than 44 and an hour and half. MyaR 17:38, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- I recall there was some pretty good Jewish humor floating around in response to him, so... yeah, I guess he did, indirectly. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 17:39, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- One cannot even imagine a sock of a sock being made sysop anywhere but here, lol. Mya you're just another nasty frustrated internet hoe, butting into an argument that doesn't concern you. Got fresh batteries for your dildo? Add that onto my time okay? You guys will make the blocks longer and longer, and evenually perma ban me, or ban me for a year, and then crow about how you aren't like CP....just so laughable. And you all are so stupid, you don't even realize that people like the Times reporter, they get what you are, and how you are right away. You are so exactly the same as the right-wing nutters you attack. Oh, why pretend you need to comb through the logs? Most of us know that the weirdo geek Jtl constantly updates a "TK Abuse" list! --TK/MyTalk 17:49, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- At that point, while we weep over having fought monsters and thereby become monsters ourselves, we may at least take solace in the fact that the act of unspeakable malice in question was banning someone for consistent trolling, rather than - say - a disagreement over Koine articles or daring to mention that "The New Ordeal" does not exist. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 17:59, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- I'd beat my breast, but that shit hurts, yo. --Kels 18:08, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Katharsis. Good for the soul. *nods* --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 18:15, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
Um, are you referring to me? I'm not a sysop. Nor am I sock, proof of which I offered to provide you. I've never even had a sock, dirty or clean. Well, except for the ones on my feet. And it's spelled 'ho'. And isn't that oxymoronic? Why would I be frustrated (I assume you mean sexually, what with the dildo reference) if I'm a ho? MyaR 17:52, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
Blocks II
Hahahaha, "He all but asked for it." I remember you bitching about me saying the same on CP, how unfair I was being, Trent! Hahahaha! --TK/MyTalk 17:55, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Oh the shame! The terrible shame! Some how I think the qualitative differences are obvious........but perhaps its all just a matter of degree. Tmtoulouse 18:12, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- I think "What a disgusting piece of shit you are, Nazi! --TK/MyTalk 17:28, 19 June 2007 (CDT)" earned you the block. humanbe in 19:19, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
- Of course you fail to tell the observing public that you not only blocked, but made it a 404 Server Block, which is something even WP & CP doesn't do! Not like I really care what happens to TK, but a server block is pretty rare indeed, where a blocked user cannot even reach their talk and user pages, or even allowed to read what people are saying about them. That might leave you open to charges TK actually is right about harassment, being abused and having different rules applied to him than other users. I do know that most wiki's and forums, people being blocked, and the community is informed of the duration. I don't seem to be able to find any blocking guidelines here. Anyway, least you think I am actually complaining, rather than just giving my random thoughts about the train wreck above, I am done with this topic. Ë. 21:04, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
|