RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/College Conspiracy

College Conspiracy | Result: Keep

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete

 * 1) Nobody wants to improve it, apparently; it currently has 0 references, poor grammar, and may be utterly incorrect. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 20:01, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Sorry, tater, you nominate too many things. This isn't wikipedia, and unless the page is misleading, I don't really see the problem with its lack of refs for a "basic quality standards" thing.  I personally want to see a better deletion reason than "no one fixed this procedural problem".  ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 20:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Just look at the article content and tell me it's worth keeping. Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 20:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Literally what I just did when I put down this keep vote. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 20:48, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) I don't think you should delete it. I don't need to provide any references for this article because just watch the film College Conspiracy to realize how much BS the whole film really is. The film just pulls statistics out of their ass to prove their bs agenda. The makers of the documentary, College Conspiracy, are obviously trying to push an agenda. That is to sell you gold and silver instead of going to college. College Conspiracy is a pseudointellectual documentary about promoting people to buy gold and silver rather than going to college. It is a waste of freaking time. --DesuMaiden (talk) 21:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, I thought you had left us. (A lot of people start an article and head for the hills; apologies.) Have any other skeptics looked at thi movie? If so, you could certainly cite them. Otherwise, you could cite the movie, with timestamps. While citation isn't necessary, it really does help; see Seeds of Death for an example of why. Basically, we just need some way to know that the movie says what we say it does, and that we aren't strawmanning. Cømrade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 00:25, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, I can provide you a link to the movie. That's all I need for citations for this movie. And then provide you guys some addition citations. Here's a link to the movie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EKolPL5Cdc --DesuMaiden (talk) 20:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Because Fuzzy waited 2 days to declare the article had no future and thus we must delete. -- Mie kal  00:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Jesus fucking Christ. That's not why I suggested a delete, and you know it. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 00:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Seems like a good start. Also, what David said. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 00:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Goat

 * Missional on the face of it, but any sort of sourcing would be a really nice thing - David Gerard (talk) 00:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)