Forum talk:Nuclear Option

I nominate this trash heap of lazy hate and delusion for deletion. Want to control content? Start a blog and monitor all comments. Start your own wiki and use checkuser and rangeblocks to stifle dissent and arguments. Stay in bed eating Weetabix and watch Teletubbies all day. 04:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Seconded. P-Foster (talk) 04:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You know, the teletubbies are pretty fun if one is on shrooms. Just saying..... 04:50, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Drugs and homosexual kids' shows are bad. +1 for smashing the thread, though. 05:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Purge it. AceX-102 05:19, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Fishbowl the fucker! 05:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. P-Foster (talk) 05:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Nice work, P. AceX-102 05:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Apparently Nx disagrees, somehow? 06:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Since when did we start deleting discussion pages? 09:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It has an historical interest and I rather thought that that burning stuff was not in our ethos. Perhaps we should put up a note saying "Debate closed - any further comments will win the lucky editor two hours in the vandal bin."
 * For that matter I would suggest that anybody who brings up the - oh so old and worn out - "Oh my God! look at what MC is doing to us! We need to do something radical like set fire to the wiki, introduce checkuser, rangeblock the world, shoot Trent" should
 * A be assumed to a a sock of MC.
 * B be sent to the bin for half a day.--BobSpring is sprung! 12:55, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Smell something that smells kind of like shit? Thats the vapors of the page I just vaporized. Ex-Troll Cheerleader (talk) 13:07, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Deleting discussion pages is against RationalWiki policy. 13:08, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm rather with pi on this.--BobSpring is sprung! 13:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Talk pages (including user talk as well as article talk pages) and other discussion pages, such as debates or the Saloon bar, are community property. They must not be deleted, nor protected, although they can be archived periodically.
 * People around here seem to have reading comprehension problems. 13:13, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey! I was just going to quote that!--BobSpring is sprung! 13:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You need to be quick if you are going to be self-righteous around here. 13:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

To those who want to delete this
"Want to control content? Start a blog and monitor all comments." EddyP (talk) 14:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey I was just going by what I thought was consensus. We have different rules at WP. Ex-Troll Cheerleader (talk) 14:18, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You forgot, "Start your own wiki and use checkuser and rangeblocks to stifle dissent and arguments." And Human forgot to say "delete discussions that just so happen to have some polls showing that this community does not favor 'rangeblocks'". But that's ridiculous, Human doesn't want rangeblock. Eeeaarum but why does Human want to delete this discussion???? Human has been so open about how y'all pretend to have elections (for bureaucrats). Pi keeps "pretending" there are elections. Pi described this wiki as a "wikiblog". I don't suppose you (Human) consider this to be your wikiblog here, do you?


 * Now I've copied the most recent version of the forum, so your option is to "move" the last version to a lumeniki, or to leave it here. I don't see any problem with the thread. It is far from being a problematic thread IMHPerception. I defended yar people [at] WikiIndex, and now I defend this thread. ~ Lumenos (talk) (other talk pages: LI1, LI2, WP) 18:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC) (Update 18:26, 27 July 2010 (UTC)) (Strikeouts 00:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC))
 * What. The.  Fuck.  Lumenos.  Theemperor
 * Okay, maybe malfunctioned a bit there. I revoke the struckout comments. Sorry about that. ~ Lumenos (talk) (other talk pages: LI1, LI2, WP) 00:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)