Talk:Fibonacci sequence

That, IM-very-HO, was a new, interesting form of vandalism, as well as its sister article 'Fibonacci to the 1000th number'. I wonder why nobody, at CP, defined pi to a precision of n thousand numbers? Ed @but not the Poor one! 15:00, 15 January 2008 (EST)
 * I wouldn't even call it "vandalism" - some one did that with our fun:pi article - only probelm is it makes the article huge. When I undid it I encouraged them to put it in it's own home (ideally a sub-page). I assume that became the sister article? human  15:38, 15 January 2008 (EST)

fibonacci sequence is pseudoscience
pls read this article about the fibonacci sequence:

http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/pseudo/fibonacc.htm

mystical numbers? numerology? on *rational wiki*? &mdash; Unsigned, by: 84.141.141.56 / talk / contribs


 * The Fibonacci sequence is just a sequence. As described in the article. --Seantalk 02:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 84.141.141.56 also posted this at Talk:Golden ratio, but I deleted that comment to keep the conversation on one page.
 * Neither of the offending articles contain any mystical or pseudoscientific statements. They just cover the basics and say that people have considered the golden ratio significant - which is true. There is no issue here. -- 03:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * My mistake: there was some merit in the article after all. I think we're all good now. --  04:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Really, it just looked like an unsubstantiated rant to me. Not so much a "source" as "some angry person's webshite". 05:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Really, was there? Looked lame to me....  09:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)