User talk:2607:FB90:3A21:6645:9449:BEFE:15AE:ED1F

JK Rowling is transphobic, no matter how many times she'll hide behind the "I'm just gender critical" or "I'm not transphobic but" or "he can call himself a woman and it's not my problem", as long as she disrespects trans women like this, she's transphobic. It is not "libelous", and the accusation that the article is "misogynistic" is even more ludicrous... Unless you can explain to me how this is "misogynist" even if the transphobia accusations are unfounded. 23:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Because JK Rowling has been a strong fighter for women’s rights. She has done a lot more than men who self identify as women.
 * Yeah, I kind of figured you'd be a TERF. Given the whole flat out denial of reality thing. 01:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * We are not obligated to accommodate dumbass radfem ideologies built on a bedrock of hate. That's not what "libel" actually means. -- Goatspeed. 01:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * By your own admission you're transphobic. Why are you complaining that we consider J.K. transphobic too? GeeJayK (talk) 01:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Please stop wasting out time, and leave because you're not going to have a good time here. 02:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)