User talk:67.135.49.116

Or not...  ħ uman  00:05, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

I *did* give you evidence...
But here it is again, just in case you missed it...

"Bunchanumbers: see our articles on MexMax and Samwell. There clearly are parodists (or agents provocateur, rather) amongst the CP camp, and, what's more, they are mostly undetectable. Sorry. ↳↑⇨↕▽← 17:47, 28 June 2008 (EDT)"

Enough? More? 15:06, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Poe Law
Hi. I left a couple of questions for you on the Poe's law page. Could you have a shot at them? Thanks.--Bobbing up 15:09, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * In case it's not clear what they are I've copied them below. Thanks again.--Bobbing up 15:48, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

The questions
Actually I've got a question for our unsigned editor. Could you tell me what is the the difference between the parody and the non-parody sites? It may be easier for you because you are "In the loop" so-to-speak. I know you say they "try too hard", but could you expand on this? Perhaps give a few concrete examples of both "legitimate fundamentalist" and and "parody fundamentalist". I don't mean the sites but actual statements. I mean this question in all seriousness and I'm interested in the answer.--Bobbing up 18:09, 28 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Ps. Could you also tell us if  this one is a parody, 'cause we don't know.  Thanks.--Bobbing up 08:07, 29 June 2008 (EDT)

Our unsigned editor...
...is likely Jinxmchue. --Helena Bonham Carter 15:58, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Really? Wow! Hi, Jinxmyshoe! How's that "almost-a-sysop" thing working out for you? 16:13, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Might I refer interested parties to our community standards RationalWiki:Community Standards. --Bobbing up 16:25, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Technically speaking, our dear HBC was merely stating her personal opinion that the present IP is likely Jinxmchue. Which is not technically "volunteering personal information", at least not as long as we don't have any solid evidence to back up that opinion. -- 16:28, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I was merely drawing people's attention to the existence of the line. I did not say it had been crossed.  I suspect however that we are walking it. One might also talk in general terms about the spirit and the letter of the law. --Bobbing up 16:36, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed, sir, indeed. Such discussions are the heart and soul of jurisprudence, while walking that line is the heart and soul of practical law. -- 16:38, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Then I am sure that we are, as usual, in agreement.--Bobbing up 16:52, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Wow. Brilliant deduction, Sherlock. That must've burned up, what? At least 3 brain cells?  Go back to acting.  You're much better at it.  67.135.49.116 01:19, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed, it is Jinxmchue. No one else can be so big an asshole in so few words.   01:23, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Wow! We are crotchety today. &mdash; Unsigned, by: 3.14159 / talk / contribs 01:26, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Denis Leary said it best: "I'm an asshole and I'm proud of it." 67.135.49.116 17:30, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * 67.135.49.116, please cease and desist from your scandalous attitude towards my client, or we will initiate proceedings towards having you excommunicated and optionally drawn and quartered. Thank you. -- 04:34, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Once again
See the red link above? Why not join up, so we don't think of you as some random bunch of numbers, and instead address you by some hilarious concatenation of characters. Otherwise, you are just some (blank) on the internet making no sense (and I might point out, not answering our questions in response to yours).  ħ uman  01:28, 2 July 2008 (EDT)