User talk:Nx/talksandbox


 * Stuff. &mdash; Unsigned, by: Nx / talk / contribs19:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * User:Human, User:Blue stuff -- Nx  / talk 19:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Moar.-- Nx  / talk 19:27, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate how assiduously Philip is sticking with RATE in order to continue claiming radiometric dating suffers demonstrable inaccuracies. I wasn't aware of any, only that RATE was a joke, but hey I'd do the same thing if it was all I had and the real evidence suggested variability more likely suggested by machine or operator error. What's more interesting is what happens when you apply the same heuristic to Philip's apologetics. If one tiny bit of it's off, doesn't the whole thing have to go out the window and get hatefully attacked without mercy as the folly of those who reject evidence in favor of blind faith? On a completely related note, my neighbors think I have Tourette syndrome from all the swearing that comes through the walls. 14:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * stuff-- Nx  / talk 20:23, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I was at a news years party once and I split a small amount of highly intoxicating fluid all over the back seat of my car, my resulting outburst caused a woman to whisper to her friend "Does he have Tourettes?". Aceword up 19:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * testt-- Nx  / talk 20:27, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * MOAR-- Nx  / talk 20:29, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * MOAR MOAR-- Nx  / talk 20:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

hm-- Nx  / talk 20:32, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

test-- Nx  / talk 20:38, 10 November 2010 (UTC) Moar stuff-- Nx  / talk 20:23, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

West&mdash; Unsigned, by: Onion / talk / contribs 20:51, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm.. Occasionaluse (talk) 21:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * &mdash; Unsigned, by: Occasionaluse / talk / contribs 21:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * &mdash; Unsigned, by: Occasionaluse / talk / contribs 21:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It's actually detecting this last line as a modification of the previous one (added one extra :), while the previous one as a new line... which is already signed, so it doesn't need to sign it. -- Nx  / talk 21:42, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Got it. Occasionaluse (talk) 21:55, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It also seems like it's still not detecting edit conflicts properly, or rather it's forcing its edits through when there's an EC. -- Nx  / talk 21:56, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It also seems like it's still not detecting edit conflicts properly, or rather it's forcing its edits through when there's an EC. -- Nx  / talk 21:56, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

So if I do this... &mdash; Unsigned, by: Occasionaluse / talk / contribs 21:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * One last time
 * &mdash; Unsigned, by: Occasionaluse / talk / contribs 21:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC)


 * test -- Nx  / talk 10:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC)