File talk:Wiki Wandal.jpg

Let's see. Miinor? Looks like it. Unknown copyright status and no license? Yep. Come on Morris. You didn't do better as the cheerleader troll either. Commence countdown to deletion. ... 00:05, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Quoth the site it came from, she's 18 yoa. Then again, people lie. DMorris2 (talk) 00:07, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * There's someone else that committed two acts of vandalism (which I knew about because I had an IP tracker on my Myspace) that I know isn't a minor because I knew her in 7th grade, but I'm hesitant to use her because I don't think I want to poke fun at her just for the sake of making lulz at Rat-Wiki. Then again, she shouldn't have vandalized if she didn't want to be made fun of. I also know a boy (well, man now) that said he'd wandalized, but I can't find him anywhere on the internet. DMorris2 (talk) 00:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Straight up, do not put any pictures of people who are not public figures an the wiki for any reason whatsoever. They will be deleted on sight. Try not to be a giant asshole, okay? P-Foster Talk " "Santorum is the cream rising to the top." " 00:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia and Conservapedia don't seem to care, but this wiki's welcome to adhere to what ever policies it desires. Whatever. DMorris2 (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * We're not Wikipedia. Conservapedia is written entirely by idiots and the mentally ill, and is really not a great example to point to as a way to do anything. P-Foster Talk "Armed with the knowledge of our past we can charter a course for our future"--MX 00:58, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh ho ho, I thought this was the wiki where pictures of non-prominent people weren't hosted! But this isn't really worth an argument, to be honest. Carry on. DMorris2 (talk) 01:03, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Do you understand the difference between pics that adults have themselves put up on the web and pics of minors that have no attribution/licence? P-Foster Talk "Armed with the knowledge of our past we can charter a course for our future"--MX 01:08, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes I do, and that pic that I uploaded was put up on a public website by an adult (18, if she was telling the truth, is considered an adult in the United States), and it was not hidden on a site where only her "friends" could see it (I couldn't have seen it if it was). But like I said before, it's not worth the fight, and even though she's an adult, she could squawk about it even though she was the one who vandalized and she was the one that uploaded the pic, so there, you win. But Jesus, you'd think we were talking about some innocent eight year old whereas we're actually talking about some person who's (apparently) the age of majority and called about five people "faggots" on a high traffic Wikipedia article. DMorris2 (talk) 01:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Um, if this is about what somebody did on Wikipedia, why don't you piss off to Wikipedia and deal with it there, instead of here, where nobody gives a toss? Just sayin'. P-Foster Talk "Armed with the knowledge of our past we can charter a course for our future"--MX 01:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Already did all of that, had the edits oversighted, reported it to the school (where she posted it from), got her internet privileges revoked, and all of that good stuff. Just making parody P, just making parody. Which is why, like I've said three times now, it's not worth arguing over. I'm just amazed at how this wiki's changed since the days when blatant copyright violations and potentially slanderous content was freely hosted here. It's changed for the better, I think. DMorris2 (talk) 01:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)