Fun talk:Liberal/Archive1

In Canada, the Liberal party is Centrist, with some left leanings. The New Democratic Party is the furthest left of the mainstream parties. --Kels 15:30, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

I just "seeded" Richard Dawkins dot net with a link to the deceit page on cp. We'll see if anything interesting happens.--PalMD-yada yada 15:54, 29 May 2007 (CDT)


 * "I sense a great disturbance in the net... as if hundreds of users posted once, then were suddenly banned." --Gulik 16:26, 29 May 2007 (CDT)

Funny?
This ought to be a flagship article but it's 90% lols. And a lot of it is in crowd lols. Should it be serioused up a bit & the funnies moved somewhere more appropriate? (I know that a lot of the content has come from respected RWians who mightn't like their pets vanishing but ...)  Susan Jayne Garlick  talk  22:49, 1 September 2007 (CDT)
 * That's "lulz", as you surely know. What do you wanna fix?  Please submit an edit plan.  Oh shit, I made you a sysop. never mind.  You are GOD now!!! human be in 23:06, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

I don't know where to put this?
Often communists, Liberals, who are almost as genetically similar to humans begins as are chimpanzees, are characterized by a lack of religious morality, common sense, love for the common man, and an extreme hatred for the goo goo dolls.

98.17.59.128 23:30, 29 November 2007 (EST)
 * Awesome work. Thanks for running it by the talk page first.  Otherwise it would have been reverted, but now we see its sublime truth and beauty. human  23:47, 29 November 2007 (EST)
 * I did not do it myself, i stole it from a vandal. 98.17.59.128 23:50, 29 November 2007 (EST)
 * If it had not been worthy of putting back in the article for lulz (a vandal's ultimate achievement), but worth saving otherwise, we create a subpage of the talk page called /vandalism and copy it there. There is a help page explaining this with examples, I believe (follow the help link at top left, look for "how to handle vandalism").  Thanks! human  14:50, 30 November 2007 (EST)

NWO
Please, to see the ongoing fighting over the NWO, go to the New World Order page. Researcher 16:19, 7 December 2007 (EST)

Burqa enablers
That's pretty funny. you are getting better Zoophile--Damo2353 03:39, 15 July 2008 (EDT)


 * What's with the silly edit warring on this article?  ħ uman  18:34, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Democrats and antisemitism. You'll no doubt censor this information.  I expect to be blocked shortly. Bohdan2 18:36, 31 July 2008 (EDT)


 * The editors at rationalwiki, are trying to end the debate by reverting factually well-sourced material --DanS 18:38, 31 July 2008 (EDT)


 * Your site has a liberal point of view, just admit it --DanS 18:38, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 * We have a "not accepting random research that supports what you already want to believe" POV. Marginally Less Chaos!Audacity! 18:39, 31 July 2008 (EDT)


 * If the data said it was true about Republicans, versus Democrats, you all would have spammed the link on every single article, and you know it--DanS 18:41, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 * No. Marginally Less Chaos!Audacity! 18:42, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

Bohdan? Dan? Please pay attention
The core of Dan's argument is still in the article, as we are still debating its worth. What I'm removing is his half-witted extrapolations. Marginally Less Chaos!Audacity! 18:42, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

No you removed 90% of my argument --DanS 18:43, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I left in the bits that said "these guys said liberals are more likely to be anti-Semitic." I took out the bits that said "an example would be Richard Dawkins, because I hate him. Also, Republicans are great." 18:45, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 * If that pdf is to be used as a source, can we at least have the particular page number(s) to scroll to?  ħ uman  18:54, 31 July 2008 (EDT)