RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Gay-themed films

Gay-themed films | Result: Deleted

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete

 * 1) An off-mission mess of a listicle Doxys Midnight Runner (talk) 13:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 13:15, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Speedy. Queexchthonic murmurings 13:16, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Making a copy of it for my own personal use, but yes, off-mission. --Castaigne (talk) 13:49, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Fukken saved, too.--Arisboch (talk) 16:29, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * o-o FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 13:52, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ [[image:Star_of_David.png|12px|link=Special:Block/Raysenn]] ''Because I'm a terrorist! 13:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) FuzzyCatPotato™ (talk/stalk) 13:52, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) I see on the talk page that people have been moaning about it being crap for six years. Spud (talk) 16:28, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) dunno if i can vote and looks to be largely academic anyways, but i fucking loathe this article, for the reasons i have already stated on the talk page. There is so much than can be said for gay themes in cinema that could be on missionable that this piece of shit doesnt even try to address. I fail to see why some are bothering to make copies. even as a list of 'gay themed' films it is hopeless. i say this not as a noisy gay but as a fan of cinema AMassiveGay (talk) 17:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 5) The portrayal of homosexuality in popular media (and films in general) might be interesting, but this is not a very good page as it stands. Carpetsmoker (talk) 18:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 6) Not sure if my vote counts, but shouldn't the article mention the Fraser/Hurley remake of Bedazzled? I mean, Fraser's character comes home with the girl of his dreams, only to be outed to her by his "roommate" who proves his point by asking Our Hero to name the cast of the off-Broadway run of The Pajama Game, amirite? CamelCasePragmatist (talk) 20:09, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Keep

 * Keep (there are enough books or persons being written about here not, because they're really that good or notable, but cause it'd send right-wing's panties in a twist) --Arisboch (talk) 14:15, 22 June 2015 (UTC)