User talk:UnicornTapestry

Welcome to teh RatWiki. Peace, love, goats. ThunderkatzHo! 10:41, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Hi. Any other questions look here: RationalWiki:Newcomers.--Bobbing up 11:24, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Thank you. Umm, goats? I feel so, so cheesy. --UnicornTapestry 01:20, 1 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Welcome to the Dollhouse! Only one corn? I have several...   ħ uman  02:23, 1 August 2008 (EDT)
 * argh! must wake up before editing!
 * Welcome anyhow, glad you could make it. We're only small but we're keen. 03:04, 1 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Hi, just glancing at "recent changes" I one of your edit comments was about NPOV. You should be aware that RW is not NPOV.--Bobbing up 03:25, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

Hello, UnicornTapestry! You know, no offense, but yours is the third most, er, colorful username here, after Unicorn Rainbow and his knockoff, Shiny Happy Rainbow Unicorn. 11:28, 29 August 2008 (EDT)

WIP
Wips at two places @ the same time. Who's a busy tapestry then? 09:36, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
 * We tend not to Ping-Pong conversations on here (we're small enough to keep an eye on Recent changes or Watchlist) so I've replied on my talk page. 10:28, 29 August 2008 (EDT)

Mission
Having seen one of your recent articles I'm not sure if you're fully up to speed about what the site is about. Might I recommend the RationalWiki:Newcomers guide. Especially the bit "What is a RationalWiki Article?--Bobbing up 16:59, 5 September 2008 (EDT)


 * Bob, I can tell you're gently rebuking me and since my Over 9000 article was just deleted, I'm guessing the two are related. The Over 9000 was intended to be a groundwork reference for a section on the anti-Scientology anti-Hal Turner group, Anonymous. It wasn't intended to be an article for anime enthusiasts at all, but gave the history of how the term came about.


 * With that said, was the article still out of line? Should I have given a rationale on the talk page?


 * I looked in vain for What is a RationalWiki Article? Could you give a link to it? Thanks.


 * best regards, --UnicornTapestry 22:22, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 * RationalWiki:Project_Whitewash/What_is_a_RationalWiki_article might do it.  ħ uman  00:08, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Sorry, the "What is" not specifically mentioned by name in the guide though it is the recommend second link. I see your logic now, but I'm confused by the red links which linked to "4Chan" and "Dragonball Z". Were they also going to have some relevance to Anonymous?--Bobbing up 02:49, 6 September 2008 (EDT)


 * Thank you. In answer, I don't think Drabonball Z is necessary after considering what you had to say. The article's not about anime, but a peek into the 'culture' underlying Anonymous. 4chan might eventually be of interest, as Anonymous and 4chan have informal links, drawing from the same 'members' and sharing the same 'language'. At this point, I know enough to be aware of it, but not enough to write an article.


 * By the way, good management style. --UnicornTapestry 03:05, 6 September 2008 (EDT)


 * Note the "over 9000" on the Scientology page in the section titled "Don't worry, ma'am, the Internet is here"– That's the fingerprints of Anonymous at work.


 * --UnicornTapestry 03:13, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

Message from the RationalWiki Ministry of Demotion and Personal Impediment
(contritely) I'm so embarrassed.

And all this power… I feel it going… going to my head!

if 'teh' deliberate, set it off with quotes or italics
No. Please try to tell from context. It usually is intentional. 07:05, 18 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Fair enough, but how about correcting that one item instead of rolling back all corrections including grammar and misspellings?


 * --UnicornTapestry 07:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, as you said on my talk page, sorry about that, do you want to do it or shall I? 18:39, 18 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I plopped in the change/revert. Thanks, H. --UnicornTapestry 03:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, sorry for mucking it up. 07:10, 19 September 2009 (UTC)


 * No sweat. --UnicornTapestry 11:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

WP
Oops, didn't realise you were here as well... I'd have been nicer... :( Totnesmartin 13:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * You were very nice! --UnicornTapestry 22:40, 23 September 2009 (UTC)