Talk:Luke Rudkowski

Pissed at us
Where? When? 12:27, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Rudkowski is a Kremlin tool
Like all good hardcore Ron Paul acolytes, Rudkowski’s work is most beneficial to the Kremlin. What’s that, the Ron Paul “revolution” is a Russian front? Answer: Yes, and it’s way past time people woke up to that.
 * Are you familiar with the concept of a bare assertion, where there's reasoning attached to the conclusion you want us to reach. There's no intuitive connection between Ron Paul and Russia.  No reason for anyone to go "yep those things have a relationship".  You need to be more explicit in why you think that.   I will, however, contribute one oddity I personally observed to your thought.  In the course of the 2012 election, I turned RT on twice.  No real good reason for why I did that, channel surfing while I still had cable.  But both times it happened they were running an interview with a Ron Paul supporter, with an interviewer who believed that he was likely to win.  I found that strange, and unlikely to happen unless they were running a lot of such content.  ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:03, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It would be instructive to simply google the terms “Ron Paul Russia” and read at least 10-20 articles written on the subject. There is certainly no shortage. Paul’s appearances on Russia Today are too many to count. Among anyone who studies such topics, stating that Ron Paul is an agent of influence for Russia is like stating water is wet. McCain even called out his son, Rand Paul on the senate floor for working for Putin, and he was serious. This is not exactly a fringe claim. https://mobile.twitter.com/lizwahl/status/1031955770764664833?lang=en
 * Rudkowski can be found on Russia Today as well as its sister sites like globalresearch and in older infowars “episodes.”
 * Forgive me for necroposting, but for future reference stating "just search it" after asserting a claim, is lazy and stupid. If you don't care enough about your claim to cite sources, why should anyone else care enough to look further into said claim? 10:03, 19 April 2019 (UTC)