RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Doctor's Data

Doctor's Data | Result: Kept

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete

 * 1) Seven years old, and still a stub. 17:58, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * 18:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Long and informative enough to be its own article and its relationship with QuackWatch is worth keeping IMO. It sucks we have a stub that's untouched for 7 years but it doesn't mean we should delete it. This isn't like the other stubs we deleted where they have conveyed virtually no information. Counter-arguing with "why don't you expand" sounds too tu quoque so don't do it. 18:29, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) All the links necessary for a good article are in the External links. It's [1] an unexpanded stub, but it's not [2] hopelessly stubbish or [3] useless. On net, it should stay. 19:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * 3) Entirely missional and more informative than no article, no reason to delete - David Gerard (talk) 09:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * 4) Its not that much of a stub in my opinion Spectral Thief Marshadow (talk) 18:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Goat

 * 1) Missional, but still a stub. RoninMacbeth (talk) 18:44, 2 September 2017 (UTC)