Essay talk:Of Pandas and People

Shouldn't this be in user space or essay space? Pomegranate (talk) 05:28, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * You must have read the n00b guide quick to have spotted that ;) -  π    05:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Yah, I'm a quick study, thanks. This wiki seems to have well-organized noob and help pages, not hard to get up to speed. Pomegranate (talk) 06:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * We do, sort of, have a "review" space that could do with some entries. 06:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * If there are no objections, I'll move it to Review:Of Pandas and People. 18:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * We do? Tmtoulouse (talk) 19:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, there are a few marked "Review:..." not sure if it's a proper namespace, as such. 19:08, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, not any more since this move. But I certainly favour organising these by "Review:" rather than any other method. 19:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Which edition?
Of course, the difference in editions is important frequently hilarious - David Gerard (talk) 19:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Could this essay be adapted into mainspace?
It seems very well written (at a glance), and our main article on Of Pandas and People is very slim indeed. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 02:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC)