RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Fun:What do you mean we have too many templates

Fun:What do you mean we have too many templates | Result: Keep

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete

 * 1) Almost all of these templates are outdated and it's based on drama that happened almost 15 years ago 21:19, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Nah. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 21:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) It's RW's history. We'll save nothing by deleting as it'll still be on the server although not visible. Scream!! (talk) 23:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) Only just discovered this … The MarcusCicero quote is golden! I only had to scroll as far as the William Dembski category to realise that I’d stumbled on something … something very special. It’s a noble artefact from your history—why commit it to the flame?  Leucippus Jodie Foster made me do it! 23:35, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 4) Harmless and inoffensive. Techpriest (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 5) ? 09:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 6) No. 21:13, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Goat

 * Funspace is mostly historical at this point. When do we stop deleting things for being outdated and just leave them as they are, similar to all the stuff nobody cares about in the conservapedia namespace? Christopher (talk) 21:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * But Christopher, that collapse template you hate so much isn't even in this page. 23:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * "RationalWiki has been accused of having too many templates. It has been alleged that is caused by our editors being virgins who suffer from aspergers." This attempt at comedy hurt me. 22:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The talkpage makes me think it’s not an attempt at comedy and the page was created after someone did “allege” that. Christopher (talk) 23:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)