RationalWiki:Articles for demotion/Drake equation

Drake equation | Result: Rapid 6-0 consensus to demote, demoted

 * – ( View discussion View log )

Demotion to silver

 * 1) I believe the article should be demoted to silver. My reason being that I think the article is a lot better than it was before I started going WikiOgre on it. The reason I left a large chunk of the section explaining the Drake equation proper uncited is cause it honestly doesn't need it, and any of the references I added would just say the same thing more or less. This wiki allows for original research after all, and we are not an encyclopedia. Vee (talk) 05:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Yeah I’ll back silver. 19:03, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) Looks good to me. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 23:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) This article looks good to me. ConverginglyRational (talk) 16:10, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 5) Satisfactory.Andrew5 (talk) 21:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 6) Good enough for me. GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 21:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Goat

 * What is the proposal for, exactly? Andrew5 (talk) 13:16, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Demotion to silver. Vee (talk) 17:07, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * How illustrated is illustrated enough for Silver? I'm not sure if the Drake Equation actually needs any more pictures than it already has, but just want to be pedantic.  14:17, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Given how the article deals in purely theoretical topics, I think the level of illustration it already has is more than sufficient. Vee (talk) 19:28, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Wow, that was quick. Clear consensus to demote. Andrew5 (talk) 23:35, 12 November 2022 (UTC)