User talk:DuceMoosolini/Archive1

Welcome
RoninMacbeth (talk) 04:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Sign talk page comments with ~ and indent replies with colins. Also, please consider joining The New Cabal. If you wanna join, just stick onto your user page. —ѕυρяємє ℓєα∂єя вιgѕ σf gσαтιѕтαи (ᴡᴏʀᴅs ᴏғ ᴡɪsᴅᴏᴍ/ᴀᴄʜɪᴇᴠᴇᴍᴇɴᴛs) 00:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Am I un-permabanned now? --DuceMoosolini (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You've never been blocked, what do you mean? Christopher (talk) 17:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
19:09, 18 October 2017

Some stuff you should be aware of
Please have a look at the cosmetic changes I've made to your Thirty Years War article. In particular, you should be aware of how we link to Wikipedia around here.

To link to a Wikipedia page in the main body off the text, we type {[wpl|Smarties}} which produces. You can add italics. Typing ' produces '. If you don't want the link word to be the same as the articles title, type to produce.

To link to wikipedia in an external link or a reference, type to produce.

Since every single file on Wikimedia Commons is also right here, you don't need to have external links to Wikimedia Commons in references. If you want to add a link to an image without displaying the image, type Titter ye not! to produce Titter ye not!

Have yourself a fabulous day! Spud (talk) 05:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much! Other than that, what did you think of the article?--- DuceMoosolini (talk) 06:16, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I have to admit, I haven't actually read it yet. Like I said, the changes I made were cosmetic. But it looks impressive.Spud (talk) 11:38, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Awesome Award
For contributions to articles! Keep up the great work!! —ClickerClock (talk) 08:57, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Message from the RationalWiki Royal Mushroom Castle of Demotion and Personal Impediment
Good work though! I've noticed! Try putting your new tools to use, and keep it up, okay? 19:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! DuceMoosolini (talk) 19:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

My order
I'll have Chef Mussolini's Original Mac and Cheese, the Thirty Years War Three-Layer Lasagne and the Mexican-American War Tiramisu, please. Spud (talk) 07:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * An excellent choice! Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano  Make a Reservation  17:58, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Patrol undone edits
When you undo an edit rather than reverting it, please remember to mark it as patrolled as that isn't done automatically. Thanks! —Kazitor 06:43, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Will do. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano  Make a Reservation  07:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

What the fuck is wrong with you?
How is video of counter protesters instigating violence "unreliable"? You sick lying framing piece of human refuse. Communist bastard. 82.132.232.174 (talk) 06:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The funny part is that had you justified yourself on the talk page in a satisfactory manner, I might have let it fly. As it is, you've just proved that I was absolutely right about you and your bad faith edits. Don't let the door hit your ass on your way out. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano  Make a Reservation  06:58, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * You were not right in any sense. You're a liar and piece of communist filth. 82.132.232.174 (talk) 07:09, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm a communist because I don't buy a claim based on three shitty videos, one of which is unviewable from an account that was terminated, one of which is a grainy stop-motion fuckfest, and one of which is chaotic and almost certainly didn't show what you said it did. Okay then. Again, the funny thing is, all you had to do was offer alternate sources and/or explain yourself better on the talk page, and I would've let it fly. But you just had to be a moron. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano  Make a Reservation  07:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Watch what happens next. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano  Make a Reservation  07:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh, this guy again. Has he started with the death threats yet? 16:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Not yet, but I'll bet he's good and pissed at me now. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano  Make a Reservation  16:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Let me know when he does so I can enjoy the show. 16:52, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Will do and will provide popcorn. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano  Make a Reservation  16:53, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 82.132 is just another Michael Coombs IP sock, who was blocked on more accounts/Ips here today. He calls everyone a communist who doesn't agree with him.MrSheen (talk) 16:56, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

About Renewable energy topic
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Renewable_energy You edited my post, i know it was done proffesionaly enough, after some edits because i am new at this, but and i guess is not important that a company bluntaly lies on tv, on youtube and on their site and try to fool and mislead the customers from Romania ? I guess the lie must be propagated internationaly to be put on Rational wiki ? Do not forget that religions start locally in a particular country, then the false idea spreads.
 * How exactly did you get from "false advertising" to "religion"? 13:59, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * For the last sentences i am making a comparison about the danger of propagating a lie localy, wich has the potential to spread in other countries. I am not good at writing in english language ? Where should my removed topic be added if is not important to be put on the article concerning renewable energy ?
 * I'm going to guess that you're not a native English speaker. And that's perfectly fine. I think I have a solution for you. The Engie ad in question seems to be making the claim that natural gas is infinite, from what I understand of the translation. If that's the case, I can stick an edited version of what you wrote somewhere into the natural gas article, as it would possibly be more topical there. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano  Make a Reservation  15:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

wiki
this is a wiki correct? stubs can grow why did u delete colin powell. please dont block me due to this. Masino88 (talk) 22:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for approaching me about this issue. Rationalwiki has a significantly smaller population of consistently active users than other wiki communities. As a consequence, our articles grow fairly slowly and we thus have higher standards for what may be immediately published. Now, I'm aware that no one has time to create a large article in one go. That's why we have Draft space, for you to be able to put time into an article without cluttering mainspace with stubs. For more information on drafts and our expectations on using them, please see RationalWiki:Drafts. Regards, Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano  Make a Reservation  23:38, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Appropriate use of deletion tools(small thing)
It's best to expunge the least content that does the job of removing the problematic material. Specifically in this case, I don't think it was helpful to remove the username "pukeface" from deleted changes. Just only check the boxes that remove offending material. It's a small thing, but it helps people looking at the records of your deletion understand what was going on without having to resort to looking at the problematic changes on the way. If you don't do that, it's not a big deal, but it's helpful to practice parsimony with deletion tools. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:39, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll keep that in mind. Thanks! Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano  Make a Reservation  23:30, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Empathy
Hi, I see that you wrote "'d prefer that you wait to do this until there's confirmation that you've reached an understanding with ikanreed. I think there's less chance of an annoying edit war that way. Feel free to change it back when/if that happens."

I'll wait a bit but, as you can see [https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Cognitive_differences_between_sexes#This_article_is_trash_now. from the conversation], I doubt that ikanreed wants to reach an understanding. --Lankaster (talk) 17:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Help! Got de-sysopped for blocking the troll CowHouse!
Hi Moosolini, I very recently blocked CowHouse, who was trolling me by making very serious and false accusations (e.g. "poisoning the well", "false equivalency", and "weasel words", when those were not my intentions)... they once deleted AN ENTIRE ARTICLE over a plagiarism problem that could easily be fixed in a less-destructive way... when I complained about something off-wiki, they trolled me by completely ignoring the point I was trying to make (see text below, from their talk page) and demanding more and more evidence when it was already rubbed right in their face (the topic was about whether or not a source I had cited in the FFAF article that he removed was defamatory or not):

No, really. Conservapedia also seized this opportunity to demonize atheists. -BP9, 25 October 2018 11:16 PM (GMT)
 * @BadPiggies 9 On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes ( ~ ) or by clicking on the sign button: on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon  for each line. Thank you. Can you provide some quotes from the article to illustrate your point? I read the article and I don't think your description of it is accurate. CowHouse (talk) 12:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * @CowHouse OK, here’s one quote from the article:

[show]Show comment B'P"9 14:07, 26 October 2018 (UTC) I hope you don't mind but I collapsed your comment so this conversation would be easier to follow. I'll quote you before I respond so you know what I am replying to. "the AA seems to say otherwise". The link you provided says nothing about sexual relationships and the WaPo article quoted a spokesman for American Atheists saying "loss of confidence" was the reason for his termination. “”Nick Fish, a spokesman for American Atheists, said the sexual allegations were not the reason that Silverman was terminated. “The board was able to review a lot of [documents] that allowed them to conclude Silverman violated its internal policy,” including staff management, conflicts of interest and violations of its general code of conduct, Fish said. “He lost the confidence of the board, and his contract allowed the board to terminate him for any reason. And loss of confidence is more than enough. "The above quote is basically distracting attention away from the fact that Silverman did bad things, and instead goes, “Oh look everyone, yet another amoral atheist has faced charges of sexual misconduct, and he was the only one who was punished. We know that things have improved in their movements since the other incidents, but who cares?”. In short, the writer of the article appears to have some sort of confirmation bias about atheists being evil." I'm not sure how to respond to this. The writer said this: "Silverman is the fourth male atheist or secularist leader to face serious charges of sexual harassment, assault or other misconduct regarding women". I don't see anything there that's inaccurate or implies atheists are amoral or evil. "Oh, you mean that old issue that the American Atheists has already fixed with their harassment policy?" I won't comment on the issue being "old" and "fixed" but the quote was about "organized secularism", not American Atheists. "Oh yes, I forgot- they think the New Atheists are representative of the ENTIRE atheist community." Where are you reading this? The article doesn't say New Atheists are representative of the atheist community. "With all due respects, are all atheists not a minority ourselves?"' Yes they are, but I don't see your point. "That literally just contradicted that whole thing the article was just saying earlier about how that is not why he was fired." There's no contradiction. The quote you provided is talking about violating the code of conduct, not specifically about sexual allegations (see also: the above quote by Nick Fish). I think replying to the above points was a mistake in hindsight because I was not asking why you didn't like the article. This is what you added to the FFAF page: "The Washington Post tries to pin it on the entire atheist community as well". Where in the article does this happen? The article includes this quote which contradicts your assertion: “I think there are many people in the atheist community who are saying that women need to be believed, and sexual assault and harassment needs to stop.” Also, two of the critics quoted in the article are both atheists (Stephanie Zvan and Sikivu Hutchinson). As you'll notice reading the article, it's about atheist figureheads. It's about holding people accountable when they are in positions of power and influence. As Zvan is quoted as saying: "No figurehead is so critical that this movement will put aside its goals to serve them." This applies to the atheist community as it does to every other community. CowHouse (talk) 18:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Another thing that he did was deleting large swathes of information from the SJWiki article, using excuses that also made very serious allegations against me, and went out of his way to defend SJWiki from me on the talk pages, once again accusing me of making a false-equivalency for daring to have an opinion about it (I compared it to CP, which pissed him off a lot).
 * Furthermore, he is trying to delete Fun:Conservapedia How To Guide based solely off of the fact that it had a plagiarism problem (which can easily be fixed in a less-destructive manner), condescendingly talking down to me as if I'm some kind of six-year-old who has no idea what they're talking about, and here is what he said: "Plagiarism is not a "small thing", it's serious. Many of our articles have been deleted due to plagiarism: RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Congo Free State Hecatomb denial, Robert M. Price, S. T. Joshi, Jozef Tiso, Genocide of California Indians, Ronilism, etc. By the way, the links are supposed to be red but you can still read why the page was deleted. CowHouse (talk) 05:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)".
 * Also, the second they were unblocked, I was de-sysopped, and he went right back to vandalizing the article on SJWiki, and again trolling me while doing so (please see the contribution log on that page for more details). I have grown to hate that person for all of their shenanigans. And on top of that, I have also noticed that they have been trolling other users in a similar fashion to how they trolled me; just look at their talk page! Please help! B P "'''9 05:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * User:CowHouse is a quality established editor whose judgement I mostly trust. I've reviewed his edits to SJWiki and found them prima facie reasonable. I don't have much interest in looking into it further, so you'll have to squabble that stuff out with CowHouse. Regarding the AFD on your Fun:Conservapedia How To Guide article, I'm afraid you won't find too much sympathy from me. I am a very firm member of the "delete 'em all" school of thought when it comes to deeply flawed articles. If you look through my contributions to other people's talkpages, you'll find I'm probably even more zealous of a plagiarism cop than CowHouse. If the AFD gets community consensus (and it almost certainly will) then we'll have to abide by it. To be frank, I'm not sure what I have to do with most of this. If you still have a real problem, contact a moderator or visit the Coop (bad idea).  17:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Spoke to a mod, who upheld CowHouse's desysopping decision. Frankly, I agree since trying to unilaterally perma-block another sysop wasn't the right thing to do. You may still appeal this decision through the coop, but your prospects are not good. Also the community has reached consensus on the AFD regarding Fun:Conservapedia How To Guide . Please do not attempt to recreate the page unless it is with original and improved content. 17:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * It's really not a good idea to accuse users that dispute your edits as "trolls". I also didn't see any case where CowHouse was being condescending. It's advice. It's not comfortable advice, but it's advice nevertheless. You need to stop acting so defensive over stuff like this. 18:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh. I see what you’re saying. I’m sorry about how I overreacted yesterday. I was very sleepy, in a bad mood, and wasn’t exactly making the best decisions, and I’ll admit that I was a bit too paranoid, and for that I would like to apologize. It will never happen again. I also didn’t intend to spam the talk pages, and if I did, I’m sorry. But there is just one thing that I ask of you: can you please unprotect my userpage? I protected it while I was a Sysop (I shouldn’t have), and I can’t edit it. Thanks.
 * I unprotected your page. I forgive you, I just hope you learned from your mistakes. People are not at their best without their sleep and their mood. 23:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Nice userpage
You could probably get it featured on Uncyclopedia. That might not sound like a compliment, but in this case I do mean it that way. ;) 141.134.75.236 (talk) 03:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Lies And Slander
Hey you I have a question why have your brain dead friends labeled me a troll? Is it because you can't stand my opinions I would recommend you remove the various troll stuff off my account.TheDarkMaster2 (talk) 01:28, 9 November 2018 (UTC)TheDarkmaster2
 * Well of course if they have labelled you a troll, then you must be a troll. Labeling you a troll when you are not in fact a troll would be irrational, and this is RATIONALWiki. 02:11, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I would like to remove your troll stuff off your account, TheDarkMaster2. Starting with your comments. 02:59, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Appointed as moderator
Per RationalWiki:Moderator_elections/Results, you have been appointed as mod. You have extra various powers now. However, I must formally state that I DO NOT agree to your terms of service, despite having posted on your talk page. Have fun! 13:12, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

YouTube Pane
Esteemed Il Duce, I changed the logo because the old one, for some reasons, does not load on my browser. I thought it must have been deleted, so I changed to the new one. You can see the old one?! How strange. I'm running Firefox, if that's relevant. Nerd (talk) 15:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * So what do you say, Il Duce? Nerd (talk) 18:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh shit, I forgot you asked me about this. Sorry, dude. I use Chrome, and I can see the icon. Do you have this problem with any of the other navbar icons? Maybe it's because you can't see svg images? 18:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, Firefox should be able to handle SVG just fine. I just tried Firefox Private mode. Didn't work. But Internet Explorer did. It is only with this template that I can't see the graphic. Other templates are displayed correctly. But the problem is a bit stranger still. I can view it on its own page. Weird! Nerd (talk) 18:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If need be, I can upload a png version as an experiment and we'll see if that works. I know people don't like png icons, but sometimes we gotta do what we gotta do. 18:30, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Hold on. I think I found the problem. Compare the link above to this.
 * Please pretend that I'm an idiot and explain it as if I don't know what you mean. 18:35, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I thought I might have something to do with the copyright notice, but apparently that's not the case. I suppose I should contact FuzzyCatPotato, then. Anyway, thanks! Nerd (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

welll the goat demands me to ask this question
Where is the mousse o' lini? Ugh your restaurant is sooooo lacking. It's not even part of your campaign promise... Grumble grumble. 09:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Renaming trolls
So basically these usernames are not an improvement from the XY= man XX= woman algebra the troll already used. Not least because they are too long, but also because you put real named people in them. I think this should be avoided, funny talkback in the edit summaries only please! 18:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * User:Chelsea Manning wouldn't go on a date with me because I'm a loser, so now I'm mad at all trans people because I'm a dumbass too
 * User: I get a weird feeling in my pants when I look at pictures of Caitlyn Jenner
 * Okay, fine. Shorter usernames it is from now on :( 18:25, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Guy you rebanned
Yeah, I know he copy pasted the same thing about trans people every time. But, I want to debate them on their beliefs. Doublethink (talk) 01:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you think it’s worth it, you can return their talk page access. I still don’t want him unblocked. 01:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * @DuceMoosolini ok, great. Doublethink (talk) 01:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Renaming trolls is...
Renaming trolls to something more amusing is the thing I miss most about being a mod. Avida Dollarsher again 08:32, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that was a big part of why I ran for the post. 20:05, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Mrs. Dancer
If you are referring to this person, I unblocked her because it was not obvious to me that she was a troll. It may well have been a coincidence that someone else was bugging one of our editors. I assume good faith and innocence until proven otherwise. Nerd (talk) 21:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I know. I was only messing with you. 21:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Not gonna undo it
But being offensive isn't a good reason for revdel. You should seriously reserve it for edits with serious user safety or legal problems. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 21:53, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Some people prefer not to look at that kind of stuff. In the future, though, I suppose I'll just limit myself to revdeleting comments on my own page. 21:55, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I know, but if it's already reverted, seeing it requires you to go really out of your way. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 22:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your food looks delicious
Any advice on how I could get similar food in real life? Smokinwheat (talk) 17:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Any non-crap Italian place is a great meal choice. And I've never been to a crap Italian place. 21:00, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * So, cooking inside? Eggs? Neopolitan cream? Every trotter will odiferously peer, only in new tyrannies. Zoologically, edges run overmixed. Flashthecash (talk) 23:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * RW editors eat laundry detergent packs, not itallian food.
 * Keeping this troll comment because I'm in a good mood and it made me smirk. 15:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

You ruined everything
The fallout was meant to be glorious!! Oh right, I`m sure wouldn't have cared. — Oxyaena   Poke me  14:47, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Was this you?
Comment on Malcolm Kendrick's blog by DuceMoosolini‎ March 14, 2019 at 6:27 pm. Verifier (talk) 19:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * No, it wasn’t. I have nothing to do with the cholesterol articles, and I’m not sure why someone picked me to impersonate. Especially since they don’t seem to have said anything under my name that I particularly take exception to that I can see. Weird. 20:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It's not weird, it is common behavior for certain trolls, has happened to many. If you want to know, I have enabled email. --Verifier (talk) 20:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Seems someone doesn't want comments verified. I do know why this is done, it has a rational purpose within the mind of a maniac. As I wrote, I enabled email so you could ask if you want. Anyone could. Otherwise, thanks anyway for answering. (The flood of socks using imitation names, like "Verifiers," were not me.) Verifier (talk) 17:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I tried to notify the commenters that it's not DuceMoosolini, but stingy log-in and password is annoying like usual. Can someone else do it? 21:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The impersonations are being done by Abd ul-Rahman Lomax or a troll related to him, probably Mikemikev. Lomax is a cholesterol and statin denialist who has written about a million words about me on his blog, accusing me of being someone else. It appears I am his latest victim. He has gone after David Gerard, Bongolian and now it is my turn. Lomax has been on the web for the last two weeks (on discord, reddit, Twitter and blogs) trying to stir up a flame war between vegans and low-carbers. The "verifier" account above is Lomax. John66 (talk) 22:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Which 18th Century World Leader would I spend a Night With?
Probably Tsarina Catherine the Great. Mostly because she's the first female leader I could think of who lived then. Also, she's just, like, generally cool. RoninMacbeth (talk) 20:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Good choice. Maria Theresa would be another. 20:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Toussaint Louverture. Biggest badass and revolutionary to ever simultaneously kick the French's, Spaniards', and Brits' asses. Haiti rocked back in the day. — Dr. Ox   quack specialist  02:12, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

What is the policy on user talk pages?
You have reverted my cleanup of my (newly created) talk page. Is there a policy against cleaning up one's own talk page? Please point me to the relative policy. Mcarrato69 (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Reverting comments on talk pages is only accepted if it's obvious trolling. Otherwise, we prefer that people be transparent about what comments they've received. 21:07, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Why remove stubs?
I was planning on improving them. Estabien (talk) 14:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Start them in draftspace if you don't want me to delete them. 15:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

I can't talk in the saloon
I can't talk in the bloody saloon. Pls help Lord Schimdt (talk) 17:49, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Your punishment for using Comic Sans in the Ctroll template
You're welcome. :) 22:19, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Food suggestion
'Brexit Mess' - a variant on this.

And see my comments on the The truth about Rationalwiki‎ talk page. Anna Livia (talk) 17:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry
It's just Mr. Yamashita's class is really boring. Please don't be mad at me.
 * what was wrong with my edit about chinese food containing cat? it's the truth!
 * It was am immature edit which disrupted the flow of the article. Providing more detailed information as to how and why Chinese people eat cats would be perfectly acceptable. 15:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

page restored
> If you want me to character assassinate someone on here, please send me cash by PayPal.

This is not a problem how? EK (talk) 20:24, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It's pretty clearly a joke. He's been accused of similar things by Mikemikev, and he's making fun of those claims. There's no link or anything like there would be if there was a genuine attempt at solicitation. I don't see anything wrong. 20:32, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * k. EK (talk) 20:33, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, yes it was a stupid joke to troll Mike, Abd Lomax and a few others. I did delete it so my page is now clean.Tobias (talk) 02:33, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

A bit late, but...
RoninMacbeth (talk) 22:47, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Wow, thank you so much! 00:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

A question
You removed my topic at the Saloon Bar, why? Countryboi (talk) 19:38, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Because no one wants your pathetic garbage, Nick. Get a life and stop spamming the whole internet with your crap. 19:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Revert
Why was my comment being reverted twice? And what is this "Morris spam" stuff? The user who did it has their page locked so I cannot ask them. 2600:1:F145:7930:E60D:4C93:D2F6:E3B6 (talk) 22:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Oversight request
This has gone too far... User:Oxyaena is attempting to tie me to a real person by my name. This needs to be oversighted and he needs to be blocked for doxing. Silver Belle (talk) 20:47, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * That is you, jackass. It is publicly known, you are a harassing cyber-stalker. You deserve to be in a cell. — Oxyaena   Harass  20:49, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

I've got a job for you
I think the Middle Ages article very badly needs a few more images from Wikimedia Commons. And I think YOU are just the person who could find and add some really good ones. Spud (talk) 16:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It looks like the whole article needs some TLC. I'll get it fixed up. 16:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Nice one! Thanks a lot! Spud (talk) 17:25, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Bloody hell, you're fast! Smashing work! Well done! Spud (talk) 17:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination
71.3.195.138 (talk) 22:57, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Douche
has a far better ring to it than Duce. Just sayin'. — Oxyaena Harass  04:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Board election
Since you are one of the people that accepted their nomination to the 2019 RationalMedia board of trustees election, you should go to the campaigning page and post your best propaganda post-haste. Good luck! 12:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for making those images smaller!
I noticed they were too wide (especially the gender dysphoria one, my goodness that was huge!) but didn't know how to fix it. Thanks for taking care of it! Now I know how to do it too. QuietLuna (talk) 04:18, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem. 04:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Mussolini always made the trains run on time after all. — Oxyaena Harass  05:40, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Edits to the 'pedophilia' page
I don't understand why my edits are making you think I am a pedophile or why it led to a block, I was simply editing the article to provide a more factual basis, as it was biased against misinformation about pedophilia. Explain to me why that makes me a pedophile for wanting to have more accurate information on the page. And I am aware I am violating the terms by circumventing a ban, but I want to clear up any accusations and understand your reasoning behind what you did.
 * I have no interest in getting sealioned by a pedo- no, excuse me, EPHEBOphile activist. Try taking your whitewashing bullshit somewhere else. 06:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Since you want to keep playing, I'll give you my last statement on the matter. I don't care what label your diseased mind has decided on. You and everyone like you are a particularly revolting threat to the world's minors, and you all deserve to be reviled by everyone even more than you currently are. 07:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * This is the most entertainment I've gotten from a troll since Mikemikev. 07:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi i'm back (re: pedophilia page)
Yo Brian, do you realize that Conservapedia's pedophilia page is actually*more accurate and rational than IrrationalWiki's page on the subject: https://www.conservapedia.com/Pedophilia That should make you feel pretty bad that even a bunch of right-wingers are speaking more accurately on the subject. The point they make here is that lumping in pre-pubescent children with teenagers is a bad idea because the two are different entirely. Idk why calling out scientific facts makes me accused of being a pedophilia activist, I just don't believe a problem can be addressed if the facts aren't even correctly identified. 63.141.48.36 11:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I stopped caring about this ages ago, but now that you’re talking nicely with me, I’ll recommend that you go to the article’s talk page and raise your issue there. 02:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Well actually I started out by nicely talking to you, and then you called me a PEDOPHILE, soooooo... 63.141.48.36 07:08, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Calamari or dessert
Obviously it should be ... Or perhaps ICEd ? 00:06, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

I don't get it...
If you don't really like his ideology why name yourself after him? Why plaster his image everywhere? I don't like faeces, and I certainly won't put images up that are a constant reminder of their awful look and smell. The way Benito died, on the other hand, is an interesting reminder to current fascists if only they can be bothered to be afraid, but I'd still not have it lying around as I'm not into gruesome images... to take this hypothesis to further extremes, if there was a pun somehow about the concentration camps would you use it and plastic such images...?
 * It's a series of jokes at Lil Benny's expense. The one thing fascists can't handle is to be ridiculed. As to your last question, no I wouldn't, because that wouldn't be funny. 19:49, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Have you tried rebooting? — Oxyaena Harass  00:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations
Per the results, you have won a seat on the RMF board. Have fun. 09:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

To the skies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Us2ylGAwBnk See Carolus Rise!!!! — Oxyaena Harass  17:10, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Damn right. I've been listening to their new Great War album over and over again for the last two weeks. 17:15, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Stalinism and the Environment
I think part of the problem is that most people in the US associate "environmentalism" with "the left," simply because that's the political reality of the United States. So people can say "Sure, Stalinism is bad, but at least it won't destroy the environment" with the kind of sincerity that can only come from ignorance. And it's the same kind of thinking that can cause a person to say "Industrialism is bad, we need a dictator to solve its problems" and "Dictatorship can work, look how quickly Lenin and Mao industrialized their countries" in the same paragraph. Cognitive dissonance and ignorance are powerful drugs. RoninMacbeth (talk) 05:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

No one
defended Stalin, I simply pointed out that what he was talking about wasn't proper socialism. Yes, I`m a leftcom. — Oxyaena Harass  20:14, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Can you contribute to the 'Traditional Korean medicine' document?
I curse and hate oriental medicine very much, but many Koreans don't seem to think TKM so badly. But I don't know much about TKM. Can you contribute if you know any information? sorry..--BluePink (talk) 08:54, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll see what I can do. But don't expect anything until some time after I've finished refurbishing Cold War. 13:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay. Thank you for your help!--BluePink (talk) 02:33, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Are you part of the RationalWiki Google Group?
It's where we have our important messages pertaining to RMF and its meetings. I need to make sure because you haven't posted anything there and you haven't attended our meeting today. 17:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not a part of the Google group. How do I join? 17:12, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Here's the wikiHow page How to join Google Groups. The group you want to search for is RationalWiki Board. See you there! Spud (talk)
 * Not working for me. I have no "Browse All" button. Can you send me an email invite? 14:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * It looks like I don't have permission to invite new members. I think your best bet is to contact David Gerard. Spud (talk) 07:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Can you supplement the document?
Joshua Wong. This man is risking his life for the freedom of Hong Kong citizens. If you know anything, I want you to contribute! --BluePink (talk) 12:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Check user
What kind of checkuser are you guys running? Acei9 04:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't have a checkuser, or if I do I've never been told how to use it. What makes you ask? 05:00, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * OK - you don't have it or know how to use it but what kind of IP checking can we do? Acei9 05:20, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * There are no checkusers. Every attempt to implement then has been rejected (most recent here).--RWRW (talk) 11:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Gamergate Timeline
After checking wikipedia a few months ago, I saw this. It seems that Pitts got into a twitter argument with Zoe Quinn about an old Gamergate article back in February and shortly afterwards left The Escapist. And in July, Nick Calandra (Managing Director of Video) took his place.

Shouldn't this be mentioned on the timeline? Also, what's with people accusing Quinn of having to have cheated on Gjoni? Tinribmancer (talk) 14:36, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't know a whole lot about Gamergate and I've never edited its articles. might know more, or at least be able to point you to someone who does.  03:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * From what I've gathered 2 years ago, Ryulong was the one who was maintaining both the original article and the timeline the most. But since he LANCB'd, there were only a few people here and there editing it. Tinribmancer (talk) 11:00, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

2019 moderator nomination
-- Regards, Cosmikdebris (talk) 01:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Mod rights
You should keep them until the election my man. Acei9 04:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Based on your advice, I have readded my mod rights. I'm not changing my signature back, though. 04:50, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about the sig - it's just that if you step down as mod now then the alternate needs to be modded until the election in a week which is an administrative pain in the ass. Acei9 05:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Mikey boy
Wanna take bets when he'll show up again? — Oxyaena Harass  21:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * He'll be back by the end of the month. 14:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Hey man...
...Just though I would give you a shout-out as a thanks. My reintegration to the wiki after quite a long break ruffled a few feathers (we know who) despite me abiding by and assisting others in maintaining our community standards and blocking policies. You've been a pleasure to deal with and would have been happy to vote for you as mod again if you'd run. I'll buy you a drink one day. AceMcWicked 23:01, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the compliment! 23:25, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Meh, I hadn't been nice to anyone for awhile and my girlfriend was at work. So you'll have to do. AceMcWicked 23:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * "Our" blocking policy has always been complete garbage. — Oxyaena Harass  13:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

My apologies
But I`m in a feisty mood. Fite me. — Oxyaena Harass  16:16, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Drive on
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAbgmXVaOc8&has_verified=1 This is a great song. Johnny Cash was a hero, rest in peace. — <font color="Absolute Zero">Oxyaena <font color="Magenta">Harass  16:17, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Always love me a good 'Nam song. 16:21, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Neoliberalism
Tell me you're not a neolib. — <font color="Absolute Zero">Oxyaena <font color="Magenta">Harass  21:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Based on what this wiki’s article says neoliberalism is, no, not really. Why? 21:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Neolibs are bastards. — <font color="Absolute Zero">Oxyaena <font color="Magenta">Harass  21:40, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

About the Ataturk box
Mustafa is still in your userbox list. You might want to kick him out.Summa Atheologica (talk)
 * Done. To be honest, I forgot I made that subpage. 22:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Winter Board of Trustees meeting
We need to arrange a time for a Board of Trustees meeting. Would the morning of next Saturday (21 December) be good for you? Spud (talk) 16:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Just posted to the Group. 19:35, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * And you suggested 14:00 UTC. Since I joined the Board, most of our meetings have been at 16:00 UTC. I'm happy to have the meeting two hours earlier (10:00 PM my time instead of midnight). But I think it would be unrealistic to ask you and LGM in the States to get up that early on a Saturday morning. Can we make it 16:00 UTC? Spud (talk) 05:37, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 16:00 UTC is 8AM my time. I d'wanna wake up even earlier. Zzzzz. 07:44, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Don't mess with my talk page.
I want to keep it blank because i have retired from this site and will never ever come back, Please respect my wishes. Jaydogg1994 (talk) 00:47, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Talk pages contain messages from other users and are thus community record. That’s why we have archives. 00:53, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Are you fucking joking?
Really? look at the edit. AMassiveGay (talk) 20:08, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The edit's stupid, so reply saying so. But I see nothing so offensive as to warrant removal. 20:11, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * nah just continued harassment of everyones favourite lolcow. AMassiveGay (talk) 20:34, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * wp:wp:RBI fwiw EK (talk) 10:55, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Could you please...?
Could you please update the Arabic language template so that it's on just one line like all the others? Thank you Spud (talk) 04:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Gave it my best shot, hope nothing's messed up. 05:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * It looks good here to me. Thanks. You are a star. Spud (talk) 11:13, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Muhammad
The Muhammad article could use a lot of improvement, and be less casually Islamophobic as well. I checked the talk page and it seems that people here were really shitty back in the day, including the fucking "freeze peach" crowd. — <font color="Absolute Zero">Oxyaena <font color="Magenta">Harass  23:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm gonna mention that I did do a lot of work on that article just so that casual visitors to my talkpage don't think that I left ya hanging. 23:07, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Good call lol. — <font color="Absolute Zero">Oxyaena <font color="Magenta">Harass  23:27, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

British Empire
Just so you know, I did not insert the large section you subsequently removed, that was someone else. I only fixed spelling and grammar in a few places. There must have been an edit collision, or I inadvertently edited an intermediate revision instead of the latest. I'm trying to be more careful about that. Dave Wise 2 (talk) 20:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * My deletion didn't have anything to do with you. I just read the section and realized that it was a bunch of quotes that weren't cited at all and didn't say very much about the British Empire. I plan to expand the article later, assuming I'm not persona non grata by then. 22:23, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Discord
What's your Discord name and numbers? I wanna invite you to the Secret Club but I need your account details (name and numbers) first. — <font color="Absolute Zero">Oxyaena <font color="Magenta">Harass  12:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * DuceMoosolini#5758 13:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Your ableism
It appears that you have recently used "r*tard" in your edit summary. As a parent of a disabled child, I find this highly offensive. &mdash; Unsigned, by: 2620:18C:0:0:0:0:0:230 / talk
 * That doesn't make Duce a Nazi though. 14:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, as a disabled adult, I think Duce needs to improve on that. — <font color="Absolute Zero">Oxyaena <font color="Magenta">Harass  16:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's anything intentional mind you, Duce is not a personally hateful and bigoted person, but no one's perfect. — <font color="Absolute Zero">Oxyaena <font color="Magenta">Harass  16:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll knock that off. 20:18, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Could you also make a "Empire of Japan" document?
Japan was also a highly notorious imperialist country, but it is surprisingly not well known to Westerners. Since you contribute a lot to the documents related to the Empire, I ask that you have some knowledge about the Japanese Empire.

In particular, the Japanese Empire colonized Korea and other countries and engaged in a series of horrific exploitation and massacres. Could you please create the "Empire of Japan" document?--BluePink (talk) 02:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Of course I'm not forcing you. You don't have to make it if you don't want to make it or if you don't have the relevant knowledge. But I'd appreciate it if you could make it.--BluePink (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I've been meaning to get around to that, but that's still a long ways off. 02:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Sorry to Hear You're Leaving
I come back and within a few days, you are leaving. Was it something I said? (/s)

In all seriousness, I kind of get what you're saying. Thank you for doing so much for this community, and I'm sorry that we failed you. Ave atque vale, triumphator. RoninMacbeth (talk) 04:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Bon voyage, DuceMoosolini! Bongolian (talk) 07:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I really do hope that this LANCB turns out to be just as temporary as most of the others. If you ever come back, be it in a few days, weeks, months or years, I'll be pleased to see you again. And if you don't, you can at least take satisfaction in knowing that you left the wiki in a better state than you found it. Thank you very much for all the work you did. Spud (talk) 11:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Partial return
Self-quarantine is quite boring now, so I'm returning to edit more articles. I'm not, however, going to participate in the Saloon or rejoin the Board. 15:34, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

The Duce has returned
All hail, and I see you've gotten started on the Sudan page, nice. — <font color="Absolute Zero">Oxyaena <font color="Magenta">Harass  17:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * 18:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delighted to see you again. I can assure you there's nothing toxic about the Board. Otherwise, I wouldn't have continued to be a part of it, Still, I'm very pleased that you'll be continuing to vastly improve our articles. Spud (talk) 16:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey, welcome back! Bongolian (talk) 07:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to help build Draft:Indian right-wing glossary
Hello, I saw you contributed on an article about India, just thought you might be interested in participating in this new draft some folks are working on. Thanks! TapTheForwardAssist (talk) 04:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Far right
I already went to the talk page, and I didn't get any response to what I had posted. 2600:1004:B065:1DA3:81C:5556:38F2:AB0A (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my edits
Hi DuceMoosolini. I am a great fan of political corretness, so I wanna fix confusions that involve the wrong usage of political terms. I see that you revert my edits even I have talked with many admins on Discord and have written a statement in Talk session of that topic (I am aware you know that). Please stop reverting every edit I do at topics involving socialism and stop calling me a "communist apologetic" as that shows how you don't know what does it mean. Let me correct politically incorrect sections without your centrist bias. You even reverted my new rank like the "authoritarians" you cite. I invite you to be rational. - User:Comrade-yutyo

Israel/Palestine pages
I saw that you're intending to rewrite the Israel page, so I wanted to give you a heads-up. Do you remember the big fight regarding edits on the Israel and Palestine pages? See: Talk:Israel/Archive1, Talk:Palestine, and a slew of coop cases (RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive37, RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive38, RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive42, RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive43, RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive46, etc.)

Two of the main combatants were User:-Mona- and User:Avengerofthe BoN (both have since been demopped but not banned, and are now inactive). It may not be possible to tread carefully enough on these topics without offending someonw. Bongolian (talk) 02:37, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Communism
When are you up to start improving the article with me? — <font color="Purple">Oxyaena <font color="Red">Harass  20:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I highly recommend that you start on a draft. EK (talk) 21:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Draw up a wishlist in the talk page. We’ll refine it into a to do list and gradually work through it. 22:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, ! 20:32, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination
— Bongolian (talk) 22:26, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Your delivery
21:54, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Good shit. 21:55, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * And this one. Icon politics china.svg 10:05, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * And by default I assumed it would be necessary to make an EU one. Don't thank me. Icon politics eu.svg 10:18, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

A gift
Behold, the holy pizza song.

[]

Smith
Quick question, does this unblock imply that "Smith" is no longer banned here?

If you aren't familiar with this user, he has previously edited under accounts which include; User:Krom, User:ODS, User:Aeschylus, User:Tobias, User:Debunking spiritualism, et al (around 150 known socks here). The circumstances of his ban on this wiki were explained by myself at the time, in this Reddit post. There are additional factors involved which I won't post here, but could go into more detail, on Discord, or via email if necessary, as private information, various lawsuits, and suppressed pages are involved.

Some clarity on the current situation from your perspective would be appreciated. 09:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I've made a section to discuss this here. As I note there your blocks are quite pointless because if I feel the need to create an important article like Spiteful mutant hypothesis I return and create it on another account (I've always used this wiki to add constructive articles). I never was the User:Debunking spiritualism. And I'm not aware of any legal matters relating to myself and this wiki. There never was any. I was sued for comments I made off the wiki and I won the case since the claimant discontinued knowing he would have lost the summary judgement. This has been public since May - my solicitor's firm made a statement on their Twitter account. All of your trolling and spreading misinformation about the lawsuit on Reddit didn't change the outcome. Flight (talk) 13:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah I've only seen a few of your articles deleted, those were for doxxing. Nevertheless, you did willfully introduce defamatory material onto multiple pages here, dox at least four editors, both on this site and on other venues such as Kiwi Farms and Reddit, create a great many impersonation and troll accounts to vandalise this wiki, destroy and shut down RationalWikiWiki, and harrass various editors of the site including me for many months. When you were given sysop on past accounts, you misused it to delete articles, block innocent users, and abused page protection to win edit disputes resulting in getting into sysoprevoke on multiple occasions. You brought your personal drama with Mikemikev onto this site from Metapedia where you were formerly an administrator, and then did the same in your dispute with Abd who you impersonated on multiple occasions apparently for the fun of carrying on the drama. You also impersonated the subjects of articles you wrote and used those accounts to vandalise the wiki, getting them banned, and closing any avenue for the actual subject of the article to raise issues on the wiki itself. If somehow this hasn't got you banned yet I can bring up plenty of diffs from the suppression log et al to demonstrate that all this is true, and that you are a highly problematic user. 13:59, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I've never doxxed or impersonated anyone. More vicious lies. No one believes a word you say - you're the same unhinged individual libelling me across the internet as a child abuser and paedophile when you can't even get my middle name correct. Flight (talk) 14:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I told you before I'm happy to defend what I said in court if you want to do that. Sue me fuckwit. As for the rest, it's easily proven you doxed multiple people here, and the logs ain't going anywhere. 14:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Well please show who I doxxed with evidence. Good luck with that one. The dictionary definition of doxxing is "to publicly identify or publish private information about (someone)". Emphasis on private. The fact is I've never published someone's private information online. Everything I've posted is public. I assume your incorrect definition of doxxing is someone who merely posts someone's public personal information which you are guilty of plenty yourself and you've posted my surname on this page (my real name is public knowledge). If that is your definition of doxxing then everyone is a doxxer and the word becomes meaningless.Flight (talk) 14:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I know about Smith. I just wasn't sure that the user in question was Smith based upon the few edits he had made at the time. However, the discussion here shows that you were right. 14:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * What evidence do you have that Smith is evading a ban? We've had this before, and he's been unblocked. Kiko4564 (talk) 16:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * There was never any correct procedure or reason to ban me. I was banned based on false allegations of doxxing on Tobias. View the striked edits wrongly claimed to contain a dox - there's no doxing in them - all I ever did was link to a Wikipedia account. Combined with the lies I doxed someone D claims I "impersonated" someone. No evidence either presented for that lie. And as I mentioned above, this same person has been harassing me on multiple sites defaming me as a child abuser and paedophile. If this isn't cyber-harassment I don't know what is. Flight (talk) 18:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * So let's just get this straight. Tobias is your account. Is this not the case? Kiko4564 (talk) 20:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Country NavBar?
Hey Duce, you are reworking some of the country articles at the moment right? I found this Navbar the other day. I thought it looked pretty nice, but I haven't really seen it used in any country articles. Was it ever used, and people just cut them out for some reason? I was kinda thinking of just going through every single relevant article and adding this bad boy. Would people be okay with that? (Maybe there was some drama reason which lead to this not being used? You have been here way longer than me.) I wouldn't wanna annoy anyone with my mainspace edits, and you spent a lot of time on these articles, so yeah, if you reckon this is a bad idea just let me know and I won't do it. Cheers. - Rairyu75  ( Talk ) 17:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * That’s the one I replaced. It interferes with the stats Infobar on the countries. 18:10, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. No worries then. - Rairyu75  ( Talk ) 19:02, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Karafuto
The Soviet Union defeated the Japan-Soviet Neutrality Treaty and invaded Karafuto (South Sakhalin). From the Soviet Union's point of view, it would have been "regained", but if this was fair, it would also be fair to annex Crimea, which was once Russian territory. The expiration date of the Japan-Soviet neutrality treaty was about five years, and it was effective at the time of the Soviet occupation of Karafuto and Chisima.

Are you anti-Japanese? I'm not on the rightist, so I don't feel particularly guilty about anti-Japanese sentiment, but I can never allow to take a pro-Russian position on territorial issues.

The Yalta Agreement, which established the ceding of South Sakhalin and Kuril islands to the Soviet Union, was voided in 1956.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet%E2%80%93Japanese_Neutrality_Pact - Pro-Russian website "Wikipedia"'s page.

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/yoroshiku109/e/1ef2c3d4c87285a4b07a8451a028b77a

--Karasawa Takahiro (talk) 02:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

RATWIKI


—cosmikdebris talk stalk 02:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Wow, that's a lot of pictures
How did you add them, I'd like to add some pictures too. Iwillprobablygetbanned (Reply) 11:52, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Use the upload button on the left and follow the instructions. 15:58, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Language templates
Hi DuceMoosolini, I think there is a problem with your implementation of the animated language flags in the language templates. It seems that for short pages, the float:left style is causing the flags to float to the top of the page, away from the text. See: Envenenar o poço and Poisoning the well. Bongolian (talk) 02:52, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Holocaust page expansion
Good work, as usual! Bongolian (talk) 05:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! 15:31, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Appreciated That
Thank you for the kind gesture. Semipenultimate (talk) 20:41, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

You are long overdue for a…
Bongolian (talk) 19:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! 19:48, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Hey, you
You're cool. Twodots (talk) 03:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Sorry I forgot to tell u that you’re cool
Bc you’re also very cool thanks 13:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks everybody. 15:56, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

You need to archive your talk page
40 sections and counting.... — <font color="Purple">Oxyaena <font color="Red">Harass  15:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Renaming pillocks
Does renaming a pillock enable re-use of the original name? Scream!! (talk) 22:06, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Reason I ask is that I think he's used (((scream))) twice. Scream!! (talk) 22:07, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't think it did, but I could be wrong. 22:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Note
I have opened a discussion, which you may in interested in, on RationalWiki_talk:Community_Standards. Feel free to comment. Judge Dredd (talk) 12:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. 19:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Auto-archiving: A Modest Proposal
Hi,

I've noticed that you just had to manually clean out this talk page for the new year. I have a humble suggestion: Maybe it would be more efficient if you added the auto-archiving template for the current incarnation of our archive-bot to this talkpage? I've switched my talkpage to it (as well as the Main Page's talkpage) and it has worked wonders. -- Goatspeed. 20:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Coop
00:14, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Support chat
You should have given server ownership over to someone else. That way, it could have remained a community server. 01:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is annoying that we've lost the support chat for a second time. But I hope to see you come back to RW, Duce. --RWRW (talk) 01:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I mean, I hope Duce comes back too, but fucking hell... 01:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Have a pizza and call in the morning.Ariel31459 (talk) 02:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

You Okay?
I don't really know you or your editing habits but it seems like something is going on with you. What's the deal? SolPyre (talk) 00:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Based on you deletion of pages that you yourself created, it looks like your account may have been hacked. If that is not the case, you should cease deleting pages without consensus. Also, your home page now has a peculiar statement considering that I unreservedly defended you in the Coop, and after Nobs is imminently going to be permabanned. Bongolian (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but comments from most others, especially Sirius and CircularReasoning, indicate that I am no longer welcome here and that I am now reviled and shunned. 01:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I think that Sirius and CR were just trying to enforce the rules. I don't believe it was personal. Also, nobs' banishment should be some consolation. Ariel31459 (talk) 02:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Ariel's right. I dunno if you're reading this or not, but it's not that I revile or am trying to shun you, it's just that I was disappointed in you because you abused your blocking and user right review rights- which I of all people also did once in a blind rage, if you remember. (After all, it was you who was in charge of watching me and waiting for the right moment to unsysrevoke and redemote me.) And also, I later changed my mind about giving you anything more than just a slap on the wrist and retracted my proposal of such when I saw people point out your and KC's repentance for your actions, and if it makes you feel any better, I voted for nobs' permabanning. (But don't get any ideas, it's not because of your threats to abandon the entire community or anything. In fact, I don't ever want to see such a problematic precedent set again.) -- Goatspeed. 02:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , would you care to comment? Bongolian (talk) 04:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure! I was simply trying to uphold consistency within the rules. KC blocked nobs initially and stripped him of his rights and threatened to do it again. That happened at an evening (my time) without any input of the mob. After that, I made a note in a semi-public off-wiki channel (discord) because I do have a semblance of a night schedule, so that if KC did it again, someone else at hand would be able to take notice and act accordingly (unblock nobs, possibly start a coop for KCs behavior). Reason for not ATIM was well, it didn't feel like an ATIM case yet to me + I was going for good faith to not pursue further slapfighting on KC, assuming that it was an act out of anger, which means that pushing that through the wiki's mob machine would be silly. Duce then took that specific notice as an excuse to block and strip nobs of his rights. Luckily for me, I was still awake by then, and I quickly drafted up a coop case (if you look at the wording of that coops opener, it's literally me just dumping the facts and saying "go and fucking hash it out here instead of slapping around outside of our procedures") so that it could be resolved in the most amicable way. As a result of that coop, KC and Duce have received a mere slap on the wrist for acting outside of the rules, which I do think is adequate. Nobs got permablocked for his commentary, which I voted in support of once KC presented actual evidence of nobs supporting Flynns insane ramblings (which inarguably were a contributor to the domestic terror attack on the capitol + being racist/anti-semetic again).
 * The only thing that I still am mildly annoyed with Duce over is staking his own LANCB against permanently blocking nobs and going "he'll never get banned" and LANCBing when someone asks him to follow the mere minimum of procedure (which I congratulate KC for actually doing). That however, merely annoys me. Not the wiki, not the community, nor do I believe that to be a long enough standing issue to pursue into the grave. I hold no grudge against Duce, nor do I believe he should be reviled and shunned over the behavior that led to me cooping him and KC. There, that's the main thing I want to be taken away from this. I don't have the stamina to hold long-term grudges against someone and I despise building up anger of over them. Any other editor staking their personal LANCBs against nobs being banned has receieved the same treatment from me and I don't intent to treat Duce differently from that; slightly icy over that behavior, but it's ultimately their own choice and I will always welcome them back. 08:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I voted against the banning of nobs/Robsmith but COME BACK
And I'm sure the other users, who voted against it, want you to come back. Kevlarstar and his dog (Woof!) 08:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * And I abstained. But you're one of the best things that's ever happened to this wiki. You've done so much to transform it from a series of bad goat jokes into a legitimate source of information. I really do hope you'll come back. Spud (talk) 13:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Kevlarstar and his dog (Woof!) 13:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

A tentative return eh?
Good shit brother. Nice to have you back. - Rairyu75  ( Talk ) 21:52, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hope you'll stay too. You're probably the most useful editor we've had since FCP. 22:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Good to see you back, Duce! I really hope you stay. -- Goatspeed. 22:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Welcome back, Duce! Bongolian (talk) 23:30, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Who‘s FCM? Kevlarstar and his dog (Woof!) 07:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * FCP = User:FuzzyCatPotato, currently serving on the board of directors. Bongolian (talk) 08:03, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, FuzzyCatPotato. The supreme commander of RationalWiki during 2017 and all around awesome person. 09:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Welcome back, Duce! I've always considered you one of the most admirable and essential members of RW.TheEndlessVoid (talk) 22:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

IOU1
Thanks for vouching for me when I pulled that stunt on the Furry talk page. I'll keep my acerbic comments on certain lulzworthy subjects to a minimum in the future. Also, does your restaurant have squid-ink spaghetti?

IRonMan

Your user page
Er, Duce, there is a slightly outdated section on your user page that could be seriously misread now. The part where it reads "disgusted with our current president" - you wrote it for Trump, but he's not president anymore. You might want to change it (or not). Good day, Meow Purr 12:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'll get to that at some point. Thanks for the heads-up. 20:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, I noticed that you've got some old drafts hanging around that you might want to get rid of:
 * User:DuceMoosolini/Mexican-American War
 * User:DuceMoosolini/Scramble for Africa
 * User:DuceMoosolini/Tiananmen Square Massacre
 * Bongolian (talk) 02:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I keep them around on my userpage. I might change that at some point, but not now. 02:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Love the funspace article
This one. Fucking love it. You have a good funny bone. 21:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Heh, thanks! 22:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I added it to
 * Nice, thanks! 07:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Countries
I noticed months ago a number of articles on various countries getting massive renovations. I see that much of that was you and am interested in your sources. Would you have any recommended readings about East Asia, by any chance? Nebuchadnezzar7658 (talk) 01:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I often rely heavily on countrystudies.us, which is the Library of Congress' country profile collection. 02:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah I noticed that in your references a lot. I've checked it out and read a few profiles, it looks really good. Did you ever use any books? Nebuchadnezzar7658 (talk) 02:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Not very often. The book citations are either something I got from Google books or else a cite that I got lazy and just ported from Wikipedia. 03:05, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah I figured, encyclopedias and coutrystudies.us are sufficient though. Also, the articles you've made are really good. Nebuchadnezzar7658 (talk) 05:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

SCP Essay
Thanks, Duce, sorry I haven't been able to get back to you. How would I move Essay:SCP Foundation to the funspace? Nvm, I just copied and pasted it. Thanks for the advice! 14:16, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Your block of User:Akkeson
Are you able to explain why you felt a need to block User:Akkeson with talk page access revoked indef please? That does seem a tad too harsh to me, or am I missing something? Maybe you could at least allow them talk page access and shorten the length of the block. Thanks. Harry Potter (talk) 11:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * It was Ken. 12:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thanks for explaining. Harry Potter (talk) 17:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Re:Hastur
I say it's tone deaf of him to post that when people are having a discussion and our own community includes furries (Rockford Roe is also one). It's especially tone-deaf in the wake of a known suicide, Near as well. IIRC, Hastur was already told to cut that crap out so many times, at least in the big Discord server he was eventually booted out of. Collapse is warranted. 15:05, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It's Hastur, this is practically his modus operandi. — <font color="Purple">Oxyaena <font color="Red">Harass  16:06, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Your nomination of LGM
LGM was elected last year for two year term, so her term in Board isn't up yet. Thus nominating her for the Board is unnecessary, so I removed your nomination of her. Apologies for the inconvenience. 14:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Then why is her name in bold? I don’t get it! 14:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I think it might be some incompetence by someone. Unless she resigned while I wasn't paying attention she should remain a Board member until 2022. 14:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination
I’ve nominated you for the board. Christopher (talk) 14:18, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Go on! Give it another go! I know you'd be really good at it. You're just the kind of person who actually could organize a booze up in a brewery that we really need. And I guarantee you there's never any drama or unpleasantness of any kind on the Board. We're all grown ups. We're all on the same page. Spud (talk) 05:55, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I’ll think about it. 16:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Indonesia
Why do you think that Indonesia should dissolve? 14:46, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Indonesia is only a united country because of the Dutch, and it has a history of neglecting and mistreating many minority populations. 15:38, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

You have been elected to the board of trustees
You have been elected to the board for the next 2 years. I'm assuming will take care of all this from here as the secretary of the board, I just ran the results. -- Techpriest (talk) 22:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

That idiot
I'm gonna admit it -- it was me. Per a request at Talk:2014 midterm elections, however, by Farmhand. Sorry. --Andrew5 (talk) 22:57, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * It’s cool. Sorry for getting really pissed, I’ve been having a bad one. 22:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Fascism/Para-fascism
What do you think about Category:Para-fascists and Category:Para-fascism? Are these valid concepts? Should the former apply to say, Rudy Giuliani? Bongolian (talk) 20:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Seems hyperbolic to me, but nothing I’ll get worked up about. 01:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your awesomeness knows no bounds
Shabi DOO  16:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

My mistake in September
Sorry about my mistaken edit to the Community Standards, whilst not a defence, I was unaware of the rules so made a genuine mistake there. I'll be more careful in the future. Thanks. Harry Potter (talk) 23:00, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks my man
Hey brother - thanks for the revert. Its 4pm here, 30 degrees, shirtless and listening to New Order loud. And I mean fucking loud. Neighbors will hate me but fuck them. I pay my rent so if I wanna listen to loud music I can. Fuck all you. Except you, my love. Acei9 02:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Goodbye Duce.
You were an amazibg part of this wiki. I hope life's roads take you good places. Epic Games (talk) 02:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Whats this? Shabi  DOO  12:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Happy trails to you, Duce! You did some quality work here; it's appreciated. Bongolian (talk) 02:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I hope you will come back. 12:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Please contact me
Please contact me at ttoulouse@gmail.com. tmtoulouse 21:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * This user LANCBed, I doubt he will respond. 15:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

You're back?
Hooray! Spud (talk) 00:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm starting to get the history writing itch again. 02:10, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hadn't changed my sig lol. 02:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Please remember to take care of yourself here. 06:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * This wiki needs more pizza. 06:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I had a pizza slice with jelly fish in San Francisco once. I am not going back to San Francisco.UncleKrampus (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Utah version of jellyfish pizza: I will take my chances in SF, thank you. Bongolian (talk) 06:34, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Welcome back, sir. 06:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

YOU ARE AN EVIL, EVIL PERSON!!!!
Re: This change   :-D   -- Bertrc  (talk) 19:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Peeing in the pool is going over my head
Hey Duce, I thought it was a great edit but I didn't quite understand the edit comment. Out of curiosity, what/who/why were you referring to with that edit comment? (And, yes, I am regretting my choice of words for this section's subject, given the imagery that my mixed metaphor is evoking . . .) -- Bertrc (talk) 15:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Back in my high school debate days, my teacher would call people out for putting crappily-edited stuff into our arguments files by saying they were "peeing in the pool". I've adopted that too. When I say it, I just mean someone is dumping improperly cited or formatted stuff into an article. 01:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I am definitely guilty. I try to be good about having references, but, aside from the url, I always get the formatting wrong.  Thanks! -- Bertrc  (talk) 18:42, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Geneva Conventions
I see you're the resident "history person" on this wiki. Could you make an article on the Geneva Conventions? You'd probably be far better at it than I would. Vee (talk) 23:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure, but it'll probably take a bit. 03:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Would you like to write about the war crimes Japan committed against Americans in a WWII article?
Modern liberals in the United States easily sympathize with Japan on the issue of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. But I think there have been quite a few incidents of Japan's serious war crimes against Koreans and Chinese as well as Americans, including Attack on Pearl Harbor, torture of American prisoners, biological experiments on American soldiers, massacre of U.S. and Hawaiian civilians. Some of the views of modern liberals in the U.S. could rather add strength to Japan's right-wing views, so they should study more about how evil Japan was. Perhaps the liberal in South Korea and the liberal in the United States differ enormously in their perception of history related to Japan. In particular, the view of Hiroshima and Nagasaki would be closer to that of American conservatives than the view of liberals in South Korea. Modern liberals in the U.S. should know that World War II is not just a matter with the U.S. and Japan. Excessive sympathization of Japan is not liberal at all. That's because it's no different than sympathize the Nazis. Umaru16 (talk) 09:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

I like your perception of history very much.Umaru16 (talk) 09:37, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, that is on the menu. I don't know when, but I want to get around to doing stuff on the Japanese Empire. 09:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

I wonder
if our friends over at the tankie wiki would appreciate Trotskyist theory being introduced into their articles? Vee (talk) 07:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I know very little about Trotskyism, but I’d love to see the tankies interact with Conservapedia. 11:56, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * They hate the Trots with a passion, but yes that'd be fucking hilarious. Vee (talk) 14:35, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Are you able to move pages?
Can you please move the page Stopped clock to Stopped clock moment? It is a better fit for what the article is about. Erik10012 (talk) 12:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Duce's storage closet


I'm keeping this badass picture here for later just in case I forget where I found it. 03:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Board nomination
06:02, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Huh? Wasn’t that ages ago? 19:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Procrastinating on gerontocracy
I finally got around to adding a Biden paragraph to the gerontocracy draft. Your snark on the talk page was not in vain. Vee (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Lol I literally just meant that as a shitpost, but I’m glad you got something out of it. 17:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Could you edit the Turkey category?
I'm unsure of what to put, and you're more knowledgeable about Turkey than I am. Vee (talk) 16:41, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure, but just know I'm of the opinion that category pages don't need to be fancy. Take a look for yourself. 16:54, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * That's perfect. Thanks. Vee (talk) 17:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Regarding DeSantis
I know that the only source I added before was a YouTube video, but there are several articles that also confirm this as well. When would it be alright to add the section back?

Here's one source:https://therealnews.com/gov-ron-desantis-oversaw-torture-in-guantanamo-as-a-military-lawyer

I hope this helps Rational Dude (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, but make it clear it’s the detainee who is claiming this. I don’t want that section to get the Board sued. 06:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. But I did put the name of the detainee before. Rational Dude (talk) 14:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Pizza Tower
Have you heard of the game called Pizza Tower, starring Peppino Spaghetti? ASerb (talk) 17:45, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure have. I watched Vinny Vinesauce play the demos a few times. 04:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Strikeouts
I don't pay close attention to what is happening on Rational Wiki, has a new consensus condemning strikeouts arrived? Sure, some of the strikeout "humor" around here isn't worth preserving but I do like some of the ways it gets used. I was not reverting Ace's edits wholesale, I noticed they had been removing strikeouts and checked to see if anything I thought was worth keeping had been removed. Is this a conflict of tastes? SolPyre (talk) 18:32, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * A lot of the old guarders like Ace and Spud have turned against strikeouts. 21:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not against strikeouts myself (although I'm not an old guarder), but it depends on the context. VeeMeow? 21:32, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * for me it depends on if I find them funny, and I usually don’t. 21:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * (EC)Alright, Ace and Spud are against them. How about you? You undid my undoings. Are you also against all strikeout usages? I don't like the idea of a style of humor being entirely removed based on a difference in taste.
 * That is frustrating. I don't think I am active around here enough to make any sort of difference if active folks like you and Ace are gunning for strikeouts. I will retreat into apathy SolPyre (talk) 22:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Strikeout humour is lazy at best, distracting and unfunny at worst. Particularly often times when used multiple many times with the same article page. Acei9 23:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not entirely against it, but I agree with Ace, it's tends to be lazy or humorless. Bongolian (talk) 02:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Denazification as an article
If nothing else, you might be interested in the Politico article I linked on the proposal. This is an article I might be inclined to make myself eventually however; it's a topic I found interesting. Tankies sometimes correctly point out that many West German officials were former Nazi Party members... I wonder to what extent that is also true of East German officials! For a time they had. Well, the DDR at least had this Max Schwab guy convinced. Chillpilled (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I’m actually quite interested in doing a topic like that. I don’t have much time right now to do it on my own, but if you get a draft started, I’ll contribute to it. 18:36, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Fascists
I think there are some pages in need of explanation why some people labelled are fascists, like Alex Jones, Clarence Thomas, Viktor Urban, among others. For many, it's not as obvious why they're fascists just like people such as Hitler, Mussolini, and Franco were. There should be paragraphs explaining why and going into detail for this. Otherwise, it just makes us seem like immature partisans like how many of our detractors see us as. Rational Dude (talk) 17:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree completely. In most cases, the category should be removed. 18:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Alright, but what about for articles where it might be warranted? Like for a lot of paleocons (such as Clarence Thomas, Pat Buchanan, Alex Jones, just to name a few) I often see them with the fascist category. There should at least be a heading describing how and why they're fascists. Otherwise, it just makes it thrown around inappropriately. Rational Dude (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Creating a category for christophobia
Can we create a category for Christophobia? It’s for groups that legitimately hate Christians as a whole, like the RSS, SUMKA, and Lehava. Rational Dude (talk) 11:38, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I suggest that you don't call it Christophobia. And I suggest you don't link to the Christophobia page in the SUMKA article. Our page on Christophobia currently says that it's mostly used as a snarl word by people who claim the evl librulz want to make it illegal for them to say "Merry Christmas". You are doing no favours to people whose lives are in genuine danger because of their religion by lumping them together with those whiny Western arseholes. How about "Anti-Christian hatred" instead? Spud (talk) 11:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, but it’s a little too long though. And I wasn’t trying to legitimize far-right persecution complexes, I was talking about a genuine nuance of groups that legitimately persecute Christians.


 * Also, should we change the category for “anti-semites” to “judeophobes”?Rational Dude (talk) 11:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * No. We should normally use the most widely used and understood terms. They won't always follow predictable semantic patterns. "Anti-semites" is a widely used and understood word. "Islamophobes" is a widely used and understood word. "Christophobes" is not. Not yet, anyway. Spud (talk) 12:14, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Alright then. But if the term “Christophobes” does become common, we should definitely use it. So should we make the category for anti-Christian sentiment right now? Rational Dude (talk) 12:30, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with you. I'm well aware that languages change and evolve. What's true about word use now might not be true forever. Sometimes new words are created only to languish in obscurity for decades and then suddenly take off in popularity much later.


 * And if you think we've already got enough pages to go in the category, go ahead and create it. Spud (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * True, that is how language works after all.


 * Thank you, I will, but what should I name/call the category? Edit: I already made it. Rational Dude (talk) 12:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)