User talk:173.191.101.65

wow, just wow...
um,smell yourself much ? i only had to read one entry and some of the 'talk' behind it to realize you are pedantic asshats... the entry was about a site called collective evolution, and Regardless of the amount of 'woo-mongering' and generally credulous take on new agey 'stuff' i may agree with as valid criticism, the author / editor / whatever who wrote about it WAS juvenile (NOT humorous), WAS condescending and just plain unnecessarily nasty...  this was in response to what i read as a VERY well presented, well reasoned,and reasonable assessment of both the original site itself, and your 'rational', spittle inflecfed rantings...  the commenter was rational in comments and response, the rationalwiki guru was irrational... buh-bye, faux rationals... &mdash; Unsigned, by: 173.191.101.65 / talk
 * Had you said nothing, you might have been mistaken as being wise. The article itself is quite spartan, hardly "spittle inflecfed rantings", in quite a contrast to your own commentary. 17:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)