RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Age of consent

Age of consent | Result: ?

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete

 * 1) "Off mission" -- reason given by User:PBustion87 on page, but posted here by User:FuzzyCatPotato to make the AFD work oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 15:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Seems pretty on-mission to me. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 16:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm not particularly in love with this article but there's no reason to delete it. Doxys Midnight Runner (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Make it three. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 21:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Goat

 * 1) Meh. Hipocrite (talk) 15:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) A great opener for New Order's best album.  Bicycle  wheel silverbrain.png 20:23, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Doing this to make the AFD happen, not actually supporting delete. Cømrade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 15:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Then why not just let someone else who wants the article gone make the deletion so we at least know the proposed reason. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 15:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ... Reasons. I totally have them. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 15:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't do that, FCP. We don't need to "make AFD happen" if there's nothing for it to do. --Castaigne (talk) 15:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The guy in delete added the AFD template, but probably didn't understand how to add the AFD here. Just fixing that. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 21:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Stop wasting everybody's time, Fuzzy. 21:41, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Everyone's acting like fixing someone's unfinished AFD is some terrible thing. It's not. Get over it. FᴜᴢᴢʏCᴀᴛPᴏᴛᴀᴛᴏ﹐ Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 22:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you're not a moron you'll have noticed that PBustion87's deletion nomination on this article was just a retaliation for his/her own puberty article being deleted. Do you really think picking up other people's frivolous AFD cases that they can't be bothered to follow through themselves is a worthwhile exercise?  22:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Weaseloid has the very correct point on this one. Let's just go ahead and archive this nonsense. --Castaigne (talk) 22:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * It's archived.
 * Sorry, Weaseloid, I didn't notice, because I wasn't following PBustion87's every action. Maybe you could say this next time, minus the insults? FuzzyCatTomato (talk/stalk) 23:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Or you could go back through the Recent Changes and do some investigative history. ;) --Castaigne (talk) 14:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Generally my thought process doesn't go, "Huh, this person failed to do something perfectly, I better look into their probably insidious motives." oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 15:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Mine do, especially a newbie editor on RW or WP - or at least I check for possible malice, just in case. if there is none, fine, and they get a nice welcome template. Bicycle  wheel silverbrain.png 18:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC)