Talk:Australian Labor Party

Bots behaving badly
''(diff) (hist). . mb Australian Labor Party‎; 19:49. . (-943) . . Stubbot (Talk | contribs | block) (Replacing page with '1')'' Uh... wha? Did I miss something, or has Stubbot (I assume it's a proper bot) developed a mind of its own? I'm off to bed right now, so I'll just take the attitude of if it's still like this in the morning, I'll simply revert, because I'm too tired to deal with this right now. In the meantime, if someone could shed some light as to why this page was replaced with 1, I'd be rather grateful. -Re dba ck 05:11, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Title/name
Surely they spell it "Labour"??? 19:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, guess not. I wonder why?  19:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The "labour" party is taken by the British Labour Party.Several ingredients (talk) 02:28, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * In Australia??? And please start learning how to successively indent comments, as I did for you here.  05:13, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Needs Work?
The page is biased, and needs so loving so it is up to scratch with the "Liberal Party" Page. If humorous but biased snark is to make up the entirety of the page, could this instead be the "fun" article for a better and more informative counter page.

--101.162.192.220 (talk) 14:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * then work on it. Тy Bored 14:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Why is this page in the centrist stupidity category when the article about the US Democratic Party isn't?
Seems a touch odd. Geminin667 (talk) 10:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)