Category talk:Sexuality

Oopsie, I just noticed Category:Sexuality. One should stay, the other should go. Thoughts? human be in 19:20, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Well, unless the articles are all about your sexuality in particular... --Kels 19:23, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
 * ROTFL! You know, I hadn't even considered that possiblity. Anyway, once we decide whether the short or long name survives, we need to build a portal and a kewl template for the articles. And drag back some of that stuff Tmt ACD'd in his rampage last night. human be in 19:43, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Well, "sexuality" is concise, but "human sexuality" just sorta rolls off the tongue (innuendo intended), doesn't it? --Kels 20:10, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
 * I do have some small concern that "sexuality" would also include dolphin fucking. Even just each other. human be in 20:17, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
 * As I recall, dolphins are the only known non-primate species that has sex for fun. --Kels 20:21, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Well OK then, dolphins get to be included. human be in 20:24, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Does this mean we have to include dolphin pr0nz now? 'Cuz, y'know, I could probably find some. --Kels 22:19, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
 * No. Please, no.  Well, at least not without adequate warningz! Would that fall under "Swimmy Fandom"? human be in 00:38, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
 * What if we just dealt with the ones who fantasize about being human? Y'know, leggies.  --jtl talk 12:46, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Is my search function fucked up, or do we lack a Homophobia article?--PalMD-Goatspeed! 12:53, 9 July 2007 (CDT)

I see I'm reopening an old debate, but I really think a Sexuality category would make more sense than a "human sexuality" one. If we don't already have any content about homosexuality in animals, then we really should, especially as it's been a hot topic on CP fairly recently, & I think it should be in the same category as the other sexuality articles. It's not "human sexuality", but it is an interesting comparison point.  w easeLOId ~ 18:14, 15 December 2008 (EST)
 * That would be in another category I think - maybe sexuality would contain human sexuality though...  ħ uman  19:45, 15 December 2008 (EST)

Also, if it is to be human sexuality, do both words need to be capitalised?  w easeLOId ~ 18:48, 15 December 2008 (EST)
 * No, this goes back to the early days and we hadn't made up our mind about capping yet. If you want to move it and fix all the occurrences you are totally welcome to do it.  ħ uman  19:45, 15 December 2008 (EST)