Talk:Really cool rich people

Not cool. 07:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * This makes an Ed stub look positively useful. 07:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hot, then? Pi, your joke is getting old. I ask, who is that crazy guy in a motorcycle jacket?  His dad owned a giant magazine empire.  07:22, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It is not a joke. Some of the articles you have created recently have had an Edish quality to them. 07:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, whine. 07:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, come on. The one that was a single quote about a TV show you just saw couldn't have been more Ed if you tried. At least the Iron Age stub had a joke. 07:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If you continue to compare me to smeg Ed, I will bring you before the for slander, my friend!  07:46, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Delete
I see no section or argument. These people are really cool, and rich. 07:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * What makes them really cool, other than being rich? & What does it have to do with the site missions?   07:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * (EC)Lets see. 1) Not mission relevant. 2) No incoming links, or a wanted page. 3) Out of the three people listed only one has an article the rest are redlinks meaning the creation of three more possible non-mission articles. 07:33, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Could be replaced with a category. 07:37, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * They are on mission because they donate millions of dollars to our cause. Just not to us :( 07:44, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Doesnt make any sense to me.. Acei9 07:44, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Though if we had a Really Cool Moderately Well Off People article that I could add myself to I'd be happy..... Acei9 07:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Still, this article contains all the information of category. 07:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree with Pi on this being off mission as an article and better off as a category (if it must be kept at all).  09:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

BILL FUCKING GATES??????? Totnesmartin (talk) 07:51, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Bill did not write your broken operating system.  He just built the company that did. I used to hate him, too, until W XP.  07:54, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Vote
So, I don't even get a chance to improve it and say why these people are cool? And the deletion process only takes one day? 05:34, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete 09:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete 10:05, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Acei9 10:07, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep bitches. What have any of you added recently?  05:20, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete –SuspectedReplicant retire me 05:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep (conditional on Human getting the article to more than just a list of seemingly unrelated people) .  Lets give him a day or two to sort out what he wants to write.  --DamoHi 07:23, 19 May 2010 (UTC)


 * A good start would be to explain how the page is even close to the mission statement. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 05:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * A better start to deletion would have been to give me time to answer that question. These are really rich fucks who put some of there wealth towards "   1. Analyzing and refuting pseudoscience  and the anti-science movement.    2. Analyzing and refuting crank ideas.    3. Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism. "  One or some of the above.  I may be wrong, but I think these people qualify.  Shouldn't be a category because they don't all deserve their own articles.  Of course, if they do, it could be.  06:32, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The article title is completely foolish and unwieldly. Acei9 07:30, 19 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks Damo. And if I fail to suck seed, I understand deletion. But give me a freaking week like they do at WP, at least? @ Ace, so maybe it needs a better title down the road, so it will be linked to?  07:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)