Talk:Do you want to be descended from a monkey?

I kind'a think that there should be a better title for this - but I'm not sure what.--BobSpring is sprung! 19:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Someone is making abunch of articles with random titles that need to be rounded up. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 19:46, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Sub-section of How come there are still monkeys. Scarlet A.pnggnostic 19:47, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Could be. Or part of a new article "Questions dumb theists think are clever". Like "How come there are still fish?"--BobSpring is sprung! 20:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Oooh, I can definitely see that as quite an awesome category. Scarlet A.pngmoral 20:08, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah - but it works better as an article title. Otherwise we get articles titled like this one. --BobSpring is sprung! 20:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Good point. Perhaps dumb questions and make a bit of a project of it. Scarlet A.pngsshole 20:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * > Forum:EvoWiki ports 20:17, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * This shouldn't be in how come there are still monkeys because it's a completely different stupid question about monkeys. It should be included as an example in argument from adverse consequences, with Rev Moon's quote (from here) & a short explanation of why it's silly.  We don't need the rest of this, which is just a series of laboured counterexamples appealing to the same fallacy.  18:24, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

No; having ascended this monkey, I am enjoying the ride. Giddyup ! 02:05, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, holding onto their tails are useful when descending, but I must say, when descending from monkeys, be careful of random droppings.  (at least the title could be well written.  This doesn't bode well for EvoWiki.  grins)[[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]Godot   Moi j'dis, laisse beton 23:03, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

'Depends upon the monkey' :) 82.44.143.26 (talk) 17:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Delete tag.
I do want to see this disappear. it's embarrassing. Ken-like in substance. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 22:59, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The best thing is the weasel's comment above. Burn. Тy talk 23:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Aye. 23:04, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Anyone here
object to being related to or ? (Search 'cute monkey' on the web for more - you know you want to). 109.150.43.10 (talk) 22:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)