User talk:Klapaucius/Archive1

Welcome to the mob. Silver Sloth 07:06, 27 January 2009 (EST)
 * Thanks for the welcome! Who'd have thought there could be such a thing as a rational mob? KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 10:07, 27 January 2009 (EST)
 * You should stick around: we're pretty irrational about 60% of the time. Love² 10:11, 27 January 2009 (EST)
 * Sounds like I should fit in quite well, then. :) KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 10:29, 27 January 2009 (EST)
 * Oh yes, you will. Welcome. I greet you on behalf of all rusty-spotted cats. Rusty-spotted catspeed! --" 19:24, 28 January 2009 (EST)
 * Why thank you. KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 19:36, 28 January 2009 (EST)
 * GOAT! MOAR GOAT! EVEN MOAR GOAT! GOAT! EXTERMINGOAT! --" 19:40, 28 January 2009 (EST)
 * Exterminating goats? My dear fellow, that's bordering on the blasphemous! KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 19:42, 28 January 2009 (EST)
 * That's my imitation of a Dalek. As you can see, they believe that all goats must be exterminated! They are the enemies of RationalWiki! My comrades, I rally you to fight these evil invaders! FOR GOATS! FOR RATIONALITY! FOR SCIENCE! FOR HAVING A FOURTH REASON! --" 19:52, 28 January 2009 (EST)

Bad News...
I've demoted you to sysop. I'm well and truly sorry for this. Get yourself a mop and bucket.TheoryOfPractice 11:40, 29 January 2009 (EST)
 * Wow, that was fast! Thanks for the tools; I shall get scrubbing. KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 12:33, 29 January 2009 (EST)

Comment
You know, you don't always have to type comment into the edit summary when making a comment. If it is on a talk page it is always a comment. --"CURtalk 18:48, 8 February 2009 (EST)
 * It's the dutiful Wikipedian in me trying to achieve 100% edit summary usage. Sad, I know. KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 18:50, 8 February 2009 (EST)

Good work
I appreciate the work you did correcting the cat. It's good to see other people actively work on categories. 18:38, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Thank you! There's just something about (lack of) apostrophe abuse that makes me correct it on sight. ;) KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 18:41, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Speling and Gramar
You thank for fixing me speling and gramar. --"CURtalk 18:25, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * No prolbem. KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 13:58, 13 February 2009 (EST)

WGOIW
Sighs. YOu did good, alright. That story is sad, pathetic, and so like the bigots of "religion is bigger than a 9 year old's desire to, you know, be happy".-- 14:06, 5 March 2009 (EST)
 * You beat me to it, Vladimir (or are you Estragon?). Yeah, Good WIGO Klapaucius. Typical church acting on doctrine rather than trying to help someone. Totnesmartin 14:09, 5 March 2009 (EST)
 * Thank you both. Just thought I'd check for my first WIGOIW entry. KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 14:12, 5 March 2009 (EST)
 * I've been double beaten to the punch, great find for the WigoW and a sad one at that... The church would rather have a 9 year old carry twins to term, nevermind the fact that it would probably lead to complications for the mother and serious issues for the children themselves. Religious opinion seems to be once they're born, it's god's issue now. SirChuckB  14:16, 5 March 2009 (EST)
 * My god, the well read Totnesmartin knows both Vlad and the characters of Godot... anyhow...  I don't know why the church doesn't just demand we all put down every bit of science and live like animals - save for things like slaughtering cows and tossing blood on the alter.  After all, god didn't give us medicine, the tree of knowledge did. and that was a sin.  therfore knowledge is a sin.  therefore, "just die you freaks, and pay the church all your money in the mean while".  (oh, was that harsh of me.  gosh. )-- 14:36, 5 March 2009 (EST)
 * Looks like I got here last... yes, good item to add. Coincidentally I am listening to Mike Malloy rant about that very case right now.  ħ uman  21:16, 5 March 2009 (EST)