Talk:Iron Age

I see no intelligent chatter. And also no contributions to make it better. Not my best? OK. Moving to "fun" without discussion? Not "your" best. 08:05, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Better now? The joke is in fun, the true is in main. Totnesmartin (talk) 08:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Why not have joke in main, too? We iz funny website, after all...  08:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * oh all right then... I can't argue while eating scrambled eggs. Totnesmartin (talk) 08:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Human is drunk and daft, whereas I am drunk and clever and writing an assignment about the challenges posed by globalisation from an egalitarian perspective. Drunking help me gets A's. Oh yeah, and it certainly aint no mainspace article. Acei9 08:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Mission
Aside from YEC stupidity, any reason to have this? We don't have pages on the Bronze, Neolithic, or Paleolithic. Tytalk 13:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I would say we should have an outline article which covers the ages of early human development, and redirect this article and Stone Age (etc.) to it. 02:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * my own view on "outline articles" is that they are pretty useless. Why cant we just have one decent article that lists the various ages, and explains them, and use redirects to subsections, rather then lots of little stub looking articles.[[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]Godot   If you google 'Google', you'll break the internet. 02:58, 17 October 2011 (UTC)  ps.  unless of course someone can state parts that are on mission.  I do think Bronze age might be worth something, since that's when most of man's religions got their hooks in the door, and it's certainly a common statement "Bronze age religion" about xianity / the bible around here.
 * That's exactly what I proposed - one article on all the little ages instead of lots of stubs. I only used the word "outline" to mean "not in great detail for the boring stuff you can go to Wikipedia for". 03:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. then I agree.  I'm used to seeing "outline" around here used for stubs that are factual, goatless, and on topics too complex to be addressed in a stub, but too irrelevant to our mission to be developed.   :-)  so yeah, i agree with Blue.  --[[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]Godot   If you google 'Google', you'll break the internet. 03:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Can we kill it now? Тy communications wire 20:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Been two months. No one has commented but you me and blue.  and i'm betting, if we can find blue, the same three people will say yah.