Template talk:Pundits2

This is just ridiculous. Why not work with the community on template:pundits instead of being as ass? Better yet, write an article on pundits to anchor this whole topic? 06:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You apparently consider yourself 'the community' - when I see more widespread rejection than from your own opinion, I'll realize I need to understand 'the community' and its concerns better. I don't consider you an adequate rep, particularly as you have now resorted to name-calling, which is irrational.  --07:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Two templates is just plain unnecessary. 07:18, 23 May 2010 (UTC)


 * The "community" is "other people". I am one of them. So are you. And you.  And you.  07:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Lets not turn this into the Care Bears. 07:31, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Delete
There is no need for this template. I'd put the template on it but I don't want to make a mess. 00:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Also, no pages link here. Speedy will probably be my approach, does anybody mind? 00:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Supportdeletequicknowdoitbeforethedamnredsgetyou! 00:55, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Kill it. -- 00:55, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * We don't need two, but i like the way this one divides up the pundits rather than throwing an alphabetical list at you like the other template. Maybe we should sort combine them?-- Centimeter INCHES  01:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The one in use now makes use of (standard) dynamic page lists. This one has no potential for that, because the category "pundits" is rather broad, and a dpl wouldn't distinguish the different "kinds."
 * Also, all of the types listed on this one are really dubious. 02:01, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe so, but I like to differentiate between, say, Frum and Coulter-- Centimeter INCHES  02:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * So would I, but generally speaking these "portal" templates don't make those sort of distinctions. 03:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * And this one's "divisions" are really low quality. Fire will ensue shortly.  03:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)