RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Champagne socialist

Champagne socialist | Result: Kept

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete
''I'm sorry, dear. I'm reading Pokemon horror stories for the internet.]] 20:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Largely a pointless hit job on a strawman |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ [[image:Star_of_David.png|12px|link=Special:Block/Raysenn]] [[User_talk:Raysenn|
 * 1) Concur. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 20:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) Agree, Massive edit war invlolved Bubba41102 CUMON STEP IT UP 20:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * So? I'm pretty sure articles on many subjects have had "edit wars", both here and on Wikipedia. Should that be a reason for removal? Carpetsmoker (talk) 20:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * check the edit history, one is incredibly long and not spov, and one is incredibly short 21:23, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) The page makes sense, some edits by some users don't.  Carpetsmoker (talk) 20:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 20:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) But only on the condition we fix it into a discussion of the phenomenon and why it's bullshit to say the upper class can't socialist. Otherwise, delete-- Mie kal  20:59, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Exactly because it's used as a snarl word I think it merits an article. But the original version was pretty crap. ScepticWombat (talk) 21:53, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 5) Something on the snarling usage, maybe some of the discussion Miekal mentions. PacWalker 22:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 6) Fine and useful as-is, could do with development - David Gerard (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Goat

 * Could be funnified (and moved accordingly). PacWalker 20:09, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * RW does have other snarl word pages so this could make sense in that context.--SpecialFFrog (talk) 20:20, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * For general informational purposes, the term was first used in 1906. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 20:51, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and put that in the article. Thank you. PacWalker 21:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)