User talk:Gcolvin

PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?. 21:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Phil. Trans.
I likely should have made it more clear in my first comment that ''Phil. Trans'' is an actual scientific journal. As it happened, I left for a bit and was unable to mention that until a few reversions occurred. - GrantC (talk) 00:52, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry
I apologize for undoing your edit. Though I was responding in good faith to what I thought was an unreasonable edit, I was actually in the wrong, while you were correct. I'm sorry. 07:05, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

No problem. I'm a newbie, so this was my first edit. I didn't expect it to be so controversial, but after a few tries it stuck. Of course now much of the article reads like the wiki is second-guessing the peer-reviewers of Schwartz, Stapp & Beauregard, and pretending to be better at quantum mechanics than the very expert Henry Stapp. When I have time I'll take it up on the talk page, since I find the current article a tendentious mess. Gcolvin (talk) 19:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Might as well get with the program
So you should view this fleeting world: A star at dawn, a bubble in a stream; A flash of lightning in a summer cloud, A flickering lamp, a phantom and a dream.

The tools you may use to deal with it -- Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 21:43, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Gcolvin (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Deleting edits from page histories
Don't do that unless the edits reveal somebody's personal information, contain serious libel, or are otherwise liable to cause harm. 07:45, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I get it now, thanks. They were all my edits, each failing to fix the one before.  I thought it was a favor to hide the mess away.  Sorry. Gcolvin (talk) 07:50, 4 March 2015 (UTC)