User talk:Graham McKnight

16:05, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

Haha, a very thorough introduction :-). Welcome, judging by political beliefs you should like it here.  I don't know if we have a good article on the Iraq War yet... halp?-α m ε σ  (!) 16:30, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
 * No, but we have a bad one. Welcome to the Dollhouse, Graham Crackers! human be in 19:25, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

I am 95% certain that you may be a conservative infiltrator by using a real name rather than engaging in liberal deceit and choosing an alias like most other editors here. Come on, own up you're a conservative aren't you? ;-)       Genghis Khant 16:32, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
 * Sorry Graham, you must realise that not everything written here (especially on user pages) is serious. I was parodying the welcome you (as a "liberal" - Conservapedian usage) might expect on the "dark-side". Genghis Khant 18:19, 16 September 2007 (EDT)


 * So, does Graham McKnight always refer to himself in the third person?CЯacke ® 17:02, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
 * This isn't a sock for Bob Dole is it?--Edgerunner 76 08:00, 17 September 2007 (EDT)
 * That Bob Dole (1996 Republican U.S. Presidential candidate) thing is a joke. He often refered to himself in third-person.--Edgerunner 76 10:14, 17 September 2007 (EDT)
 * Welcome to the Wiki Graham McKnight! Have a goat:
 * [[Image:goat.jpg|40px]]
 * And again welcome! - Icewedge 18:23, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
 * ''P.S. don't be disturbed by our obsession with goats, we just think they cute!

CP
Do you post on CP as just Graham?--Edgerunner 76 09:01, 24 September 2007 (EDT)


 * You have the right to remain silent. Genghis Khant 12:01, 24 September 2007 (EDT)


 * After checking the Banwatch page I think that I have my answer, so you can probably disregard my question.--Edgerunner 76 12:08, 24 September 2007 (EDT)

No, I don't post on CP --Graham 10:30, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
 * Smart move! --ИїģḥŤ¤Ṭŗáìṇ  ♦Τάļќ ǃ 14:08, 29 September 2007 (EDT)

Could you blame me for believing that RWs mission was to bring down CP? The celebrated Samwell incident? I am taking a different direction after a change of heart on this matter. Thanks for the clarification Human. I will continue to write articles here, but have also created an account at CP so I can better study their polemical arguments and perhaps offer a little constructive crit' in order to help end this feud.--Graham 08:14, 13 November 2007 (EST)


 * What "feud"? Susan  ... purrrrrr ...  08:35, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Feigning ignorance?--Graham 08:39, 13 November 2007 (EST)


 * If you can call totally despising everything they stand for "a feud" then good luck to you. Susan  ... purrrrrr ...  08:48, 13 November 2007 (EST)
 * I recognise that what we are engaged in here exemplifies perfectly the standard dictionary definition of feud: 'any dispute or rivalry, esp. when bitter or protracted.'--Graham 09:09, 13 November 2007 (EST)


 * Ah...like the Korean war was a "police action"! Ha!  Susan  ... purrrrrr ...  09:33, 13 November 2007 (EST)

No, like two adversaries bearing incompatible methodologies. You are certainly quick to judge and lambast me, Susan.--Graham 12:22, 13 November 2007 (EST)


 * I had no intention of any personal imputation - just that dictionary definitions can be misleading. I don't think that anyone could bridge the yawning chasm betweenCP & RW. A feud, to me, is a minor, irrational difference of agreement quite other than that which exists here. Susan  ... purrrrrr ...  12:49, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Thank you for making clear your relative understanding of the word 'feud'. I am better able to understand the cause of your upset now.--Graham 13:34, 13 November 2007 (EST)