Talk:Property is theft

IIRC this has been deleted umpteen times already. Most because of the misogynistic crap you try and sneak in at the end. -- PsyGremlin  11:36, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't read it to the end before moving. I see that the user has, er, a history. Should I nuke it?--ZooGuard (talk) 11:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I've stuck a delete tag on. let the mob decide. -- PsyGremlin  11:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, off-mission, and definitely misogynistic to boot. Junggai (talk) 11:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved it back to the original place. Mob on. I should learn to pay more attention. +1 for deletion.--ZooGuard (talk) 11:47, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

This essay hasn't been posted anywhere before - it was prompted by a single question I had about intellectual property, which led to me fitting everything together. The section you call misogynist had to be included because it just doesn't make sense without it - and anyway 'misogynist' is just a label, not an argument. If the truth is 'misogynist', then so it is. The whole idea is just too brilliant for people to understand I guess. But you can delete it. Fall down (talk) 11:57, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * FD, I'm not even going to discuss your usual crap with you. You've tried this before, with the same crap content before. Now fuck off back to RWW and whine about how you've been abused here. -- PsyGremlin  12:06, 23 February 2011 (UTC)