Talk:Right Wing Watch

Criticism
I'm wondering if there is any criticism directed at this organization. I know it's clearly biased against right-wings so I myself am hesitant on citing this site for that kind of reason, something people will dismiss. 03:01, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Media Bias Fact Check says "Right Wing Watch does occasionally take statements out of context and they sometimes source to far left sources. Overall, this is a left biased website that is mixed for factual reporting." It is probably unwise to use them as a primary source, then. However they generally aggregate news from the interwebs so secondary sources shouldn't be too hard to find. Regards, Cosmikdebris (talk) 03:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I haven't seen an instance where they did take a quote out of context. Media Bias Fact Check links one evidence of "taking out of context" to Snopes, but Snopes was referring to Newslo, and Right Wing Watch wasn't wrong; they did quoted him saying that "those who didn't vote Trump will be guilty of murder" and did not fabricate claims about a "civil war". So that link Media Bias Fact Check used is... weird. 03:33, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It's always good practice to get multiple sources, especially for controversial or divisive topics, to avoid the appearance of bias. Media Bias Fact Check pays attention to the use of loaded words in headlines, too, as a reference point for a site's bias. Cheers, Cosmikdebris (talk) 04:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Styx fanboy ponders: Does Rationalwiki endorse rape?
If not then they would not have issues with legitimate complaints raised against the most well known member of Right Wing Watch2600:1702:2A00:B3F0:3464:B5CF:8EEA:C76D (talk) 23:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * RW does not endorse rape. We aren't fond of bad faith accusations either. Furthermore, the allegations have little to do with RWW, but rather are directed at a single contributor. 23:10, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You really sure you don't want to leave another comment on how mean we are to Styx at Talk:Styxhexenhammer666? 00:47, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I like how no one here can actually act in good faith. It's funny like if your not willing to put any of the flaws of rightwingwatch on an article is it really rational?2600:1702:2A00:B3F0:D4D9:B463:664A:C035 (talk) 13:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I mean, you aren't acting in good faith, you're promoting a smear campaign for Styx so... 13:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * A two year old Smear campaign, by the way. 13:14, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It's going to be a three-year smear campaign at this rate. 00:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Styx fanboy screams at a wall: Why is it when I post citations that are not youtube related they still get treated as if they are youtube related
I'm citing other sources that are not YouTube related but for some irrational reason the edits keep being undone. This is irrational2600:1702:2A00:B3F0:6112:CB4D:A9A5:3A47 (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Still surrrre you don't want to leave a comment at Styx's talk page? 18:46, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I mean I cited a non-youtube source so it's clearly more credible. But please continue to defend rape2600:1702:2A00:B3F0:4983:50DD:43FF:A9C5 (talk) 21:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Also more citations:
 * https://bigleaguepolitics.com/revealed-anti-gay-facebook-past-of-right-wing-watchs-jared-holt/
 * &mdash; Unsigned, by: a styx fanboy
 * Mario The Door is This Way.jpg
 * That's basically just the same fucking Facebook link from earlier, but with added commentary from a no-name "news" aggregator ran by a bunch of former Breitbart hacks with gutter bottom journalistic standards that immediately hawks me "Let's Go Brandon" T-shirts and has articles like "Shane Trejo Discusses Disenfranchisement Of Conservatives With OANN" and Qanon promotion. Here's my diff for anyone else when this gets memory holed, since you're freaking atrocious at vetting sources. 22:19, 28 November 2021 (UTC)