User talk:Stabby the Misanthrope/sig

Testing
-- 19:18, 6 January 2008 (EST) Hmm... That didn't do anything.


 * First make a page like this and subst your sig template on that page, and then subst that in your sig. Second, can you take the date and time out of the quote box?  19:24, 6 January 2008 (EST)
 * To clarify, if you were to make User:Radioactive afikomen/sigsubst the text on the page would read .  19:26, 6 January 2008 (EST)
 * Then, after making sure that Raw Signatures is checked set as your sig.  19:30, 6 January 2008 (EST)
 * I've been trying, and failing, to get your timestamp to print on the same line as your sig. I wonder why it displays like it does? (I removed a cr from the end, and closed all the span tags - I think) human  20:55, 6 January 2008 (EST)

over 600!!!11!!!1ONEONE ELVENTY!!!!
yOU pWN!!!! human  06:41, 7 January 2008 (EST)


 * I am amazed at myself. I made 160 edits in about four days.  At this rate, I'm set to pass my edit count at Uncyclopedia (which is about 1600, counting IP and puppet edits) in no time.  -- 14:21, 11 January 2008 (EST)

Over 900!!!11!!1!11!!1!
Yay! -- 00:37, 14 January 2008 (EST)

ITS OVER 900!!!!!!!!!!1111111111 -- Cheers,  ♦ R  y  a  n  ♦  ♦ ǂ wuz here ǂ  00:42, 14 January 2008 (EST)

I have made a miraculous discovery
Constantly updating your edit count on your signture is a great way to pad your edit count. I just checked my contributions, and discovered that had I spent 4.1% of all edits just on updating my edit count number. That's not counting any other changes in my signature, just the numeric updates. (The precise number was 40/975, counting this edit.) -- 23:19, 14 January 2008 (EST)

Update: Updating my edit count alone makes up 119 out of 3,616 edits, which is 3.3% of all my edits. Not that is what I call padding one's edit count! -- 17:47, 24 March 2008 (EDT)

1337!!!11!!1! edits
Lulz. -- 01:10, 23 January 2008 (EST)

Over 2000!!1!1!!11!1! edits
Yay! I have more edits than Christianity has years! I'm so happy ^_^  -- 20:48, 11 February 2008 (EST)

Ho do you know?
How does one check the number of own edits? Not that I'm interested in my edits, I value quality more than quantity, you know... Editor at RWwas rooting for HD DVD 07:04, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 * Go through your "my contributions" page and count 'em up. :-)  -- 08:34, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 * No magic command to have one's contributions at once? Too lazy to count, I'll focus on "quality" then... Editor at RWwas rooting for HD DVD 08:37, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 * Well, on Uncyclopedia, there's an edit counter (copypaste my username in and submit to see), but for some odd reason, we don't have it here. -- 08:45, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 * That would be useful! We must petition for it. Editor at RWwas rooting for HD DVD 08:52, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 * Would Linus be the one to ask? -- 08:53, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 * Don't ask me who to ask! :-D I guess so anyway. Editor at RWwas rooting for HD DVD 08:55, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 * But: how would you feel, having sacrificed so much time and effort counting your edits and keeping track of them, to know that there's a bot doing it for you? Editor at RWwas rooting for HD DVD 08:57, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 * Elated. I "report" my edit count in my signature because I'm obsessive like that.  A bot (is that what it is?) would make it easier.  :-)  -- 09:02, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 * I counted mine a few months ago at there were like 6000 or so :(. What's nice about the counter function is the namespace identification.  CP uses something that someone wrote off-site that is even cooler. It's linked, I believe, from their "welcome" template.  But don't go look now, wait until Friday.  We'll go slashdot them at 8 PM GMT next Friday... human  16:26, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 * Did you just call something about Conservapedia cool? Blasphemy!  -- 16:30, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 * Hey, they got something else right once, too, but I don't remember what it was. Oh, and I got cdesign proponentsists there, believe it or not.  Oh, and my edits are at about 15,800. human  16:49, 18 February 2008 (EST)

Interesting
Because my old signature included a link to RationalWiki:Moral Matrix in it, that page was the #23 or so most-linked page on RationalWiki, with something like 308 links to it. But now that I've replaced that link, rather than immediately dropping like a rock to the bottom of the Most linked to pages like it should have, its number of reported links just fell to 290-something, and each time I refreshed the page, it dropped a little lower each time. Why the slow reaction by the wiki? -- 01:31, 12 March 2008 (EDT)

I just manually counted the number of links RationalWiki:Moral Matrix really has: 6 links. And lo, it has reached its proper rank of... the 1229th most-linked page on all RationalWiki! It rules! : ) -- 01:36, 12 March 2008 (EDT)

Perhaps this is why your net connection got blocked?
I'm gonna keep my eye on you RA! You need to step away from the computer by any chance? :-) DogP  17:31, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
 * Nah. I'm waiting for the bus at school.  This is the only time I can squeeze in RW.  -- 17:41, 31 March 2008 (EDT)

Couldn't you...
...write something to do this automatically? 22:50, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
 * If I knew how.  22:52, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
 * Ya big jessie. There must be somewhere to look this kind of thing up on Wikipedia? I was thinking of putting a bit in my signature (one of the OTT ones) that said "Over 1 Edit!" -- 'cause then it would always be right. *folds arms in satisfied way* 22:55, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
 * As far as I know, there is no wikicode of that sort of function. It would require more complex coding, like parser or javascript or whatever you use for stuff like that.  It's out of my league.   23:01, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
 * Plus, you like updating it, don't you? :) 23:08, 21 May 2008 (EDT)

Since this part is no longer in my signature
I can't contain myself. I just gotta' say it:

'''Over 7,100 edits! 7,500 edits!'''

Oh, glorious catharsis. Or ego rush, or whatever the term for it is. 15:57, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
 * 14914 now. Nowwhat? 18:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * That was a different time for me. I don't keep track of my edit count anymore.   21:52, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You're in the top ten last time I checked, I have a table somewhere. Nowwhat? 23:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)