Fun:The RationalWiki Silly Person's Society

__NEWSECTIONLINK__

This Society is growing rapidly!

The RationalWiki Silly Person's Society was founded by SuperJosh at 03:29AM on Saturday 28th November 2009 in a drunken stupor. It aims to fill RationalWiki full of net memes, bigotry to the religious and non-religious, and to create a rigid, but arbitrary, hierarchy where every Thursday a person is chosen at random to be high-priest (or priestess) of RationalWiki.

Please add your name to the roster if you wish to join the Silly Person's Society - it's free!

Silly Person's Society Roster
(talk) 11:49, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 03:29, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 03:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * TheoryOfPractice 03:34, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The noble Lord Sir Javascap the Third, Champion of the third realm and ruler of the Second, does accept your invitation to step to the mantle of Great Member of the Silly Person's Society.
 * Please choose Thanatos 03:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC) for all your blocking needs.
 * as of three years ago.
 * 08:01, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Aye, feck. I'lldothafightforfree! 16:10, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It's free, therefore it's my moral imperative to join. --Kels 20:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * About time we had one of these. 20:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * High Pope of the Unpredictable reporting for doody. --[[Image:Concrnedresident logo.png|140px|link=User:Concernedresident|Concernedresident|baseline]]Ask me about our truffle 07:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Why the fuck did I never join? I demand an answer! 14:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I am so in. Mr. Swift (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * How did i miss this? I'm in and so's my anteater. Totnesmartin (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * And, of course, the Squirrels. Secret Squirrel (talk) 14:40, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I want not approve on it, I think amusing group. 20:34, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I want to proselitize to RatWikians and turn this wiki into a spiritually sound God fearing institution. Who will join me? God is Lord
 * Solomon Grundy (talk) 22:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm only going to use an IP address just to make things confusing. Kindly suck my clit. 121.211.33.244 (talk) 16:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

No fucking memes

 * AceMcWicked 03:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * You are aware this is in fun space and not to be taken seriously? 04:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * And moar bent. Teh, that is. Mispeelings rukle. 06:20, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Get Bent.  04:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Memes are OK in moderation or appropriate context

 * 04:34, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * You hav no iodea wha moderatioon mans! 10:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Moar memes

 * Why this sudden objection to memes I see over the site? In the broadest sense of the term all ideas are memes.  More memes!--BobNot Jim 10:27, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Memes are half the fun of this site. 19:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I can haz moar memes pleez? Kthanxbai. TheoryOfPractice 19:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Sup dawg, I herd you didn't liek memes on yr intertubes but I accidentally in your base. 20:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * 15:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Less yoyos

 * What? --127․0․0․1 18:41, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Fucking goddamn fucking memes
Fucking memes are fucking stupid. AceMcWicked 20:01, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I was killed by a meme, once. --Kels 20:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The Holy word of God says it is appointed unto man to die once! Therefore you can't have been killed and reincarnated, Kells you are an unbelieber. God is Lord (talk) 11:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The worst meme is that one where we tell the tale(s) of the previous night's or week's utter debauchery, or what we imagine we remember of it, anyway. 20:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Quiet you! that is for everyones amusement. Besides I didn't tell the tale of the other weekends debauchery wherein someone went missing and the bloodstained doorknob and bed sheets caused people to quiver in fear. Aceof Spades 21:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

I've never fucked a meme
Aren't the ugly memes, you know, the ones that aren't chased, chaste? 16:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC) C ® ackeЯ
 * Good question. I've never fucked a meme, either, so I wouldn't know. 16:39, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I've never fucked any meme over in my life that didn't have it coming to it. 16:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

A new Silly Person's meme
I can't believe I just accidentally the whole damn thing! 23:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I just accidentally myself. It was totally.   23:22, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * THE WHOLE THING!!! I ACCIDENTALLIED IT!! 20:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Important
I seem to have a grapefruit stuck on my thumb. Can someone pass a motion to have it removed? 20:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I object, my constituents can't even afford grapefruit. -  π    11:26, 2 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Where are you, my seekrit dolphin wife? 17:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * You leave Rule 34 out of this! I mean it... Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 17:09, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I only drove the bus there once. The Chinese guy punched me and stole my keys. 17:12, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * He stole you keys? That reminds me of this time I dressed up as a Chinese guy and stole some young punk's keys.... 17:13, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Motion two
Unreleventually to the prior motion, I put forward a second motion calling for the immediate replacement of the RationalWiki:Proposed_Constitution,_May_2011 with the proposed Reform Constitutional Convention currently under draft by the user commonly identified as resident troll, MarcusCicero, on the basis that I haven't read either but that the troll's constitution is written in Middle English, and he obviously spent a lot of time doing that and should be rewarded for his efforts.

As an aside, I liek pudding and want not approve on it, I think tasty food. 17:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Regarding parties
In response to the emergence of several so-called "political parties" on teh RationalWacky, the RationalWiki Silly Person's Society would like to affirm it's position on this website solely as a society, and will not succumb to attempts at politics, which, when brought onto a wiki, is really, really gay. The RSPS would also like to take this opportunity to affirm it's position as pro-gay, in the homosexual sense, not the negative-connotated "gay" sense, which is gay. 15:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * And I'd like to add that, while we don't believe in parties, we sure as fuck believe in other parties. Especially if there is sex and/or alcohol involved! 15:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I oft wond'r'd why the Flintstones seemed so happy to be having a gay olde tyme.  15:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * [[File:Party.gif]][[File:Ymca.gif]][[File:Hump.gif]] 15:53, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The RationalWiki Progressive Party hereby denounces the RSPS as an enemy of progress. We would do so by means of a template if we could be bothered to make one.  However, we may be able to find common ground in our shared support of "other parties" and possibly "no fucking memes". --95.154.230.253 (talk) 16:16, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm bringing sexy books
This shit is one of the last pages on this wiki dedicated to silly fun instead of arguing about books. We should be laughing about shit, not arguing about books, life's too short for shit. I love laughing about shit, and I think you all do too. You've forgotten what shit's really about.

Also, I bought this book three days ago for seventy quid and don't know what to do with it. Who do I talk to about getting a refund? That Chinese guy still has my keys too, I've been locked out my house for eleven months. 00:06, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd like to refund you your money, but I spent it all last night on a high-class hooker. Sorry pal. 14:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Seventy quid is high class? Faaahkin ell. 23:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Here in Minnesota in the middle of winter, you'd be surprised.... 11:00, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposal: Brxbrx meme competition
Objective: Collect, or coin, as many silly memes about Brxbrx as possible &mdash; Unsigned, by: 58.163.175.185 / talk / contribs
 * That is an objectively terrible idea. 04:36, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I hate this idea so much I'm going to


 * While I think it's an inherently bad idea, I do think this is also not your circle jerk anymore! 11:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * This page is like the 1391 massacre of Jews in Cordova. -  π    silverbrain.png 11:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, how did I miss this?-- 03:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Miss what? It never happened. 10:42, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I've got one: argumentum ad brxbrx-- 23:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

IrrationalWiki: The drinking game
Thanks to ADK for this one. The game is simple: look through the various talkpages on the Wiki and on RationalWikiWiki. Everytime you see the arguement "Why do they call it 'RationalWiki'?" or the variation of someone calling it "IrrationalWiki," take a drink. Double up on the drink if they used the term "TrashionalWiki." 02:41, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, and one more to add: triple up on your drink for those who say RationalWiki is "just like CONservapedia!" 03:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Before you start playing search for the AA group nearest to you, you will need one after. -- 02:47, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * To go to AA, you have to first admit you have a problem. For me, if there's a drink in my hand, there is NO problem. Therefore, I'm not an alcoholic. 02:49, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Drink up, me boys (and gals)!!!
(Per previous discussion of RationalWiki: the drinking game)

I thought this was supposed to be rational Wiki. How can the Wiki be rational if they have a Silly Person's Society? Furthermore, a Wiki that rejects religion outright and isn't, at least, open-minded to people's religious beliefs when it comes to things like faith healing, creation doctrine and Christian Science isn't exactly a sign of being "rational" now is it? Plus, how can a place that fucking allows cursing by it's fucking editors be in any way rational when we all know that no truly rational person would need to swear and curse to get their fucking point across. Sounds like RationalWiki is more like "IrrationalWiki" to me. What a trashionalWiki this place seems to be. Conservative Punk (talk) 10:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Laughing at the unprovable and unproven--the supernatural--in all it's forms is very rational. The place where the rationality of rationalwiki breaks down is around neutrality, if there were a NPOV requisite then the site's large extreme left wing demographic (like I'm talking batshit left, I'm 'left' but these guys are like masturbating to Karl Marx and Lenin photos kind of mental agenda pushing lunatics) would be limited in how much damage they could do and the academic viability of the site would be significant. Sadly they seem to be either the majority, or at least the most vocal demographic leaving the rest of us with broken toys and a used condom hanging out our shitters. 121.211.33.244 (talk) 16:26, 5 March 2016 (UTC)