User talk:17br9

What would you do if we blocked this one too? 18br0 or 17bs0? Peter horas non numero nisi serenas 06:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi. Could I remind you that you are not supposed to go back and edit points that have been responded to.  Could you also sign your posts.  Perhaps you could work on making them make sense as well. --Bob"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." 19:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * hopelessness in full effect that is bitch of it.17br9 (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Archive pages
Don't edit them, got it? Otherwise, you'll be reverted. Thanks! 10:38, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * correcting typo.how is archived page not protected.17br9 (talk) 10:44, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * ESL? CopperheadHisssssss 15:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Please do not edit posts to which people have responded. To a certain extent the point is moot, as your posts are incomprehensible both before and after your subsequent edits - but you still should not do it.--Bob"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." 16:38, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * convenient to change typos no excuses.17br9 (talk) 16:43, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If you keep doing it you will be blocked.--Bob"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." 18:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * typos need to be changed otherwise it looks uncanny.17br9 (talk) 21:10, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. P-Foster Talk " "Santorum is the cream rising to the top." " 21:13, 26 March 2012 (UTC) If you continue post-editing you will be blocked.--Bob"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." 18:58, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

You continued post-editing.
...and now you are blocked.P-Foster Talk " "Santorum is the cream rising to the top." " 22:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * eat shit meaning gfu arguing is no use.17br9 (talk) 01:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * make believe this found it on searching for 17br9.Thanks ya.18br0 (talk) 04:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Removing posts
If post-editing your comments is bad&mdash;which it is, you've only been told that a million times already&mdash;then surely you could have worked out that removing them completely would be worse. As such, you have been vandal binned, which means that you can only edit once every half hour. Use your edits wisely: use the preview button. Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem 04:39, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Stop it.
Stupid or trolling? Which is it? Theory of Practice "I never set out to hit anybody. It's just that a lot of people got hit." -- Andy Roberts 03:21, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not replied to. It's gone too far with speculation challenging arguing.can I ask you a thing?17br9 (talk) 04:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Doesn't matter if it's relpied to, you can't change the time stamp. Get it right the first time and leave it alone. You've been told countless times. We don't have a lot of rules, but try not to crap all over the ones we have. You can ask whatever you want. Theory of Practice "I never set out to hit anybody. It's just that a lot of people got hit." -- Andy Roberts 04:06, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Is that Website legal? 17br9 (talk) 04:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You will have to ask the Internet Police. Theory of Practice "I never set out to hit anybody. It's just that a lot of people got hit." -- Andy Roberts 15:02, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * whoa sarcasm.17br9 (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Whoa. Theory of Practice "I never set out to hit anybody. It's just that a lot of people got hit." -- Andy Roberts 18:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)