Category talk:Article Creation Drive

Brilliant Idea!!!!!!!! -Ĭ₠ŴΣĐĝё 21:41, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
 * To bad we can't import the entire category en masse to CP.DocSock 21:42, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
 * What exactly do you want to import? If it's amusing enough, I could pull something together. --jtl talk 23:37, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Oh, wait...you said to CP, not RW. I'm no help there. --jtl talk 23:37, 4 June 2007 (CDT)

Shouldn't this category be called "ADHD"? I mean, I get the joke, and all, and it certainly boosts our penis size article count. Do we have to come up with something funny to say about every letter? How about a "Sesame Street dot com has an article about X" template? Will random visitors get the joke, or just think we are even weirder than we already are? Enquiring minds want to be schooled, is all... human be in 11:07, 7 June 2007 (CDT)
 * I think its finally time to purge this category. Its useless and provides no more lulz. Thoughts? - Icewedge (*bleet*) 13:03, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I guess that it's probably just confusing, it could be interesting to those interested in the history of RW, (If such people exist) but I'd' say zap it.--Bobbing up 13:06, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I agree with teh big ZAPping...  ħ uman  23:12, 12 July 2008 (EDT)

Ah memories. 24.141.66.208 23:32, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Wow. This is old.  Pages like this make me want to start a Category:RationalWiki museum to commemorate them.   23:56, 12 July 2008 (EDT)


 * IIRC we ditched this in favor of "Fun" once the joke got old.-- [[Image:Asclepius staff.png|8px]]-PalMD -- 00:15, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
 * As I said, kill it, it won't be missed... and remove it from 30-odd articles. Really odd articles!  ħ uman  01:57, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I'll miss it.  02:31, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
 * So copy it and a screenshot of its inhabitants to our version of BJAODN?  ħ uman  03:39, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I favor saving the talk pages of deleted pages, provided the talk page is of a sufficient length (which this one is). (1) To preserve a record of the discussion regarding the article in question's deletion, in order that the reasons for said deletion do not come into dispute in the future.  (2)To preserve a record of the wiki's culture.  By understanding our own evolution we can better understand ourselves.   03:48, 13 July 2008 (EDT)

Really, this is embarrassing. Can we remove this category from the articles and delete the cat? Sterile 00:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, go ahead. Is it added by any templates?  01:36, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think so, but I'll look when I do this. Sterile 01:40, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Hmmmm.... A lot of these are "fun numbers." Sterile 01:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)