User talk:William Grimes

Topic
Generally when people proclaiming themselves to be conservatives pop up, they're just here to vandalize. I'm glad to see somebody not doing such a thing. яεvεятεя σғ ωαη∂αℓιsм, ραтяσℓℓεя σғ ε∂ιтs, ΓУППЯ ・「ҭагк」・асђіεѵеϻԑηтѕ・тіме: 03:38, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I see. However, I would most certainly contend that only some individuals see the Song of Solomon as so-called “erotica.” The Bible is not a book intended to sexually arouse, and I think it does a disservice to compare a work divinely inspired by God to such utter smut as “Fifty Shades of Grey’’. The latter has absolutely no redeeming qualities whatsoever in any sort of literary, educational, or spiritual sense. However, the Word of God contains the key to eternal salvation. --William Grimes (talk) 03:49, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

The rich ruleth over the poor
Methinks that, if you truly believe the rich rule over the poor, your political beliefs should be much more leftward than "don't get debt". 04:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
 * One might think that. Nonetheless, private charities have proven to be far more able to distribute aid to the needy than the government which uses force to take money and pay for ineffective programs. Soup kitchens are superior to food stamps, and private medical aid is way better than the monstrosity that is Medicaid. So-called “bleeding heart liberals” are trying to hide the homelessness problem in predominately liberal cities, and issuing punitive measures such as spikes and other barriers on benches and other surfaces the homeless use to sleep. They also criminalize feeding homeless people, or creating useless regulations such as the requirement for someone providing food to a homeless person also owning a public restroom or something. I’m a conservative because I believe in cutting the red tape and abolishing the ineffective government programs that do far more harm than good. --William Grimes (talk) 04:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Huh?
Pastor Grimes? What are you doing here? --Elvis is King (talk) 00:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Must be fun talking to yourself. 08:01, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Please stop
Stop dragging a discussion beyond what's settled. I may also add that it's not a matter of hive mind as much as a matter of no one caring about your opinion. 17:04, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I was simply responding to claims and accusations made against me. Surely there is no fault against that. Although I must say that only a hive mind can claim to value science above God and then make thoroughly anti-scientific claims. For instance, in Talk:Autogynephilia, it was claimed that intentional, medically self-induced gynecomastia constitutes womanhood. This is thoroughly wrong on a scientific level. I am not a medical doctor, but I did take rigorous biology courses and labs as an undergraduate, and I know this to be the case. Hence, liberal political correctness overrides real science per hive mind mentality. --William Grimes (talk) 23:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The page is archived, tough shit. 23:48, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * PS: You're lucky no one has banned this account for block evasion Elvis, given you are perma-banned from this site and all. 23:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Is that your intellectual, well thought out response? This proves further that I am correct. --William Grimes (talk) 23:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You can believe whatever you want Elvis, doesn't make it any less false. 23:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * So, science doesn't matter now? What happened to science being one of your false idols? Guess SJWism superseded it. Additionally, I am not Elvis is King, for he is a deacon at NTBC, and I am the pastor. --William Grimes (talk) 23:52, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't worship jack fucking shit. The Abrahamic god is a myth, the books that praise him paper, and the people who worship him deluded. All of that being said I'm not going to stop them from worshiping, hell no one can. That being said there is zero evidence that God (with the big G) is real. Get over it, tough shit, thems the breaks, etc. 23:59, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * PS: you're EiK, wiser minds than mine saw through that horseshit a long time ago. 23:59, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Do you have any evidence for that? The Bible is absolutely free of errors, so it's not "just another book" because books written by mere man without the influence of the Holy Spirit contain errors. Additionally, are you referring to the claims made by that liberal variety blog that went defunct recently because they lack substantive original content? I assume you have no real desire to defend this liberal variety blog.--William Grimes (talk) 21:34, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Blocked for a week. Considering your history of transphobic remarks, this message is completely unacceptable to send to any user in our site. Colonel Sanders has previously removed the message, demonstrating the user wants nothing to do with you. You then tried to revert it and started an edit war with GrammarCommie. Continue the conduct again and face more blocks. I don't care if you're actually Elvis is King or not, I just want this behavior to stop. 01:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * So, pointing out basic medical facts constitutes "transphobic remarks" now?! What a joke! This gentleman needs to be saved so badly, and I have an obligation as a good pastor to bring the pastoral counseling the liberal government seeks to censor! Praise be unto God Almighty! --William Grimes (talk) 01:25, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Claims like "defying God’s natural law has severe ramifications on physical and mental health." and "Pumping men with estrogen for long periods of time results in increased risk for cardiovascular problems, blood clots, and other issues ranging from excessive emotional distress to morbid obesity." are far from "basic medical fact" and the counseling you gave is clearly unwanted, and repeated "counseling" is considered harassment. You want to push more buttons, go ahead, but there will be consequences. 02:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Here, here, and here. These are credible articles showing that my claims are indeed based in medical science. When God gets it right the first time, stick with it. If it ain't broke, don't fix it or some such. Men don't need high levels of estrogen. My counseling is stellar, and I graduated in the top ten percent of my class at Bob Jones University when I went back for my MDiv. --William Grimes (talk) 22:03, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The third doesn't support your outlandish claim ("much is unknown about this huge area of life"), only talks about more research being needed as well as discussing lifestyle changes, while the first two (both being the same link) doesn't advise against hormone changing therapy whatsoever, only taking into considering which estrogen to use ("Pre-existing cardiovascular risks should be taken into consideration when prescribing and choosing the type of estrogens in cross-sex hormone administration (oral vs transdermal). In addition, risk factors, as they emerge with aging, should be addressed.").
 * How about you just leave medical advice to a real doctor. 23:16, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It is important to consider that the AMA as well as the APA have sold out to the LGBT lobby as can be seen here. We need real medical practice and counseling advice to allow people to flourish. It is true that cross-sex hormones don't have any benefits, and have loads of health problems. This is a violation of the Hippocratic Oath, which says to "do no harm." Hormones don't treat mental illness, nor does genital mutilation as can be seen here. For a site that is supposed to debunk junk science, there is an awful lot of junk science being pushed. I guess it's fine as long as it is done in the name of social justice and virtue signalling. --William Grimes (talk) 01:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * hahahahaha lol wow you're citing the federalist lmfao 01:35, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I like how the article says that transgender people have "gender confusion". It's hard to take an article seriously when it fails to understand the basic concepts of being trans. 01:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * i read the article several times, and whoever wrote it sounds like he never had close relations to a transgendered person or doesn't know how it feels like to be one in the slightest. he keeps using the "biological reality" argument or a variation of it, ignoring that what you think in your head in a normal day, consistently is also biological reality (hello neurotransmitters) and people who think this way aren't in an altered biological state that would give rise to delusions and hallucinations. it's also rich that the title of the article labels transgenderism is just "mass hysteria" (though i don't think the writer writes headlines, it's usually the editors who do that). 02:14, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * also APA have sold out to the LGBT lobby as can be seen what is this the new "pharma shill" gambit how about they just did something that reforms against bigoted traditional conventions that have screwed multitudes of people over 02:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * "We need real medical practice and counseling advice to allow people to flourish."
 * How about you just leave medical advice to a real doctor. 02:36, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The APA declassified gender confusion as a mental disorder due to protests and bribery from the LGBT lobby. This is verified fact at this point. Biological realities are chromosomes, genitalia, and all of this. I mean, most people can look between their legs and figure out what gender they are. Genesis 1:27 says you are either male or female. Also interesting so-called liberals like yourselves only support genital mutilation when we are castrating men in dresses. --William Grimes (talk) 03:19, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * sure call it "bribery", indicative that you slurp up conservative "news" outlets without second thought (funny you accused us of doing just that, except with liberal outlets, eh?). i don't give a fuck on what genesis says. also, go ahead and call sex reassignment surgery "genital mutilation" and "castration". lol. "men in dresses" <- stop being such a transphobic shithead. 03:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * "Pastor" Grimes is at it again. I really don't need any counseling from you: I already have a counselor who graduated from a real university and not a quack fundie school with an unintentionally hilarious acronym. You're not convincing anyone with this utter nonsense, now are you? You're not going to talk me out of undergoing sex reassignment surgery as soon as I possibly can, especially not with your Federalist articles. --Sophie (talk) 03:32, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

03:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The reason transgenderism (not "gender confusion") used to be part of "mental disorder" is that transphobes like you have a bigoted attitude and say hurtful things with your naked demeaning language rather than treating transgender people with respect (you know like that Hippocratic oath you crow about). This attitude is the problem, not transgender people or the LGBT lobby. 03:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

grimes needs to wear a dress at some point. they're really comfy. (although me personally not fan of dress) 03:35, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I second this. Sooooooooooooooooooooo comfy. --Sophie (talk) 03:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm tempted to call Poe's Law on this person - considering entries from his linked church website/wiki such as this and this. -- Yisfidri  ( talk ) 03:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm sure Grimes will look simply fabulous in one. 👌 03:39, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Maybe Grimes can try on my coziest and absolutely adorable nightgown... :) --Sophie (talk) 03:44, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * What color is it and is it really soft? 03:46, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It's purple (my favorite) and it is ridiculously soft! I don't know why I would want any other sleepwear. I have another one that's red that I wear, but only when my favorite one is dirty. --Sophie (talk) 03:49, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.-Deuteronomy 22:5 &mdash; Unsigned, by: William Grimes / talk / contribs
 * if it pisses god off, then i'm totally wearing a tuxedo. 03:52, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * How about pink? Pink and softness usually go well together like a fluffy pink kitten on a cotton candy unicorn. You can never go wrong with pink though!
 * You should totes wear a tuxedo with pink hearts all over it. 03:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Why do you freaks all insist on cross dressing? Why even have separate garments for the genders at this point?! Everyone wear a dress!!!!!!!!!!!! ABSOULTELY DETESTABLE AND WICKED IN THE SIGHT OF THE LIVING GOD WHO KNOWS YOUR EVERY THOUGHT AND SEES YOUR EVERY MOVE! --William Grimes (talk) 04:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * this is delicious. 04:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * also, who do you think is worse, a cross-dresser or some hateful creepy stalker? i think i'd rather go with the cross-dresser. 04:29, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Everyone should wear a dress of their favorite color! What's your favorite color? Mine is, well, it depends on my mood. I do think I look great in red, maroon, blue, and black. I don't have a green dress though. I like to have a green dress. 04:34, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * babyluigionfire no likey dress, droog. 04:35, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I love how it's now a fact of humanity that Mario and Luigi both officially have worn a dress and seem very happy about it too. 04:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * will Baby Luigi (the true god of gods) ever wear a dress? he might look great in one. 04:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * You have to ask him first, though. No forcing! But it never hurts to try, right? It never hurts to extend your palette on nice, comfortable clothes. 04:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Philippians 2:10-11: "That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father."

1 Corinthians 6:9 "9Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,"

Deuteronomy 23:1 "He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord."

Luke 13:28 "28 There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out."

You will regret your transgressions! REPENT BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE! I BEG OF YOU!!!!
 * You do realize the original writers of the Bible likely wore unisex dresses/tunics right? 19:42, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * "I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth."- Genesis 9:13. Remember that the rainbow is a symbol of Almighty God! You sodomites and sodomite enablers can't mock it for too much longer! HALLELUJAH! --William Grimes (talk) 02:47, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * One, never mention the whole "murder flood" thing around me or I'll decimate your "all loving God" nonsense. Two, you still haven't answered my question regarding your knowledge of ancient fashion trends. 02:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * All I know is Jesus ain't no fag! He done be a MANLY MAN walking around in a three piece suit! Don't you know that, sonny boy? --Mr. Bojangles (talk) 02:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure they didn't have suits back then, or even pants for that matter, which would in turn make three piece suits difficult. 03:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Naw, Jesus was a good conservative, and conservatives ain't going around prancin' in a pride parade in a dress singing about raining men and whatnot. Just ask the great, learned Rev. Grimes about Jesus who woulda give Arnie a run for his money in the Terminator. --Mr. Bojangles (talk) 03:05, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I have bad news for you... Jesus wore a dress.
 * Jesus never wore a dress, sinner! Dresses are for effeminate sissies like Colonel Sanders who refuse to get right with the Lord! Mockers like Mr. Bojangles won't be making a mockery of God and His people when he's in Hell with gnashing teeth! God hateth the proud and boastful! You fools need to realize that sodomite month will ruin the minds of the kids! They will end up growing up to be perverts themselves being exposed to such vile putrid nonsense as a man in drag! --William Grimes (talk) 03:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, technically you are correct, Jesus wore a Chiton, not a dress. Though it should be noted that the Chiton was a unisex garment worn by both men and women. 03:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Unisex is a liberal hoax. How else are you supposed to tell men and women apart if they don't wear different clothes? Common sense, here, people! --Mr. Bojangles (talk) 03:34, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hmm... You may be on to something there... Best send you to the re-educational gulag. 03:39, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

NO MORE PRO-SODOMITE, PRO-TRANSVESTITE NONSENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I AM A MAN OF GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MY BLOOD IS BOILING NOW, AND I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I ABSOLUTELY DO NOT APPROVE OF SUCH WRETCHEDNESS! ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING! YOU SODOMITES AND SODOMITE ENABLERS HAVE NO SHAME WHATSOEVER ! --William Grimes (talk) 03:51, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * making your posts in allcaps makes you look more like a fuckstick, you fuckstick 03:52, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * How far in the closet even is this guy?! --Sophie (talk) 03:55, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * WHY ARE WE YELLING!?!?!? 03:56, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * !!!!!!!!!EXCLAMAT!ON PO!NTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Sophie (talk) 03:56, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Squidward:People talk loud when they wanna act smart, right?
 * Plankton: [loudly] Correct!
 * Squidward: So, if we play loud, people might think we're good. Everybody ready? And a one, and a two, and a one, two, three, four! [screen cuts to the outside of the music school and a blast of noise ensues, breaking the windows. Cuts back inside the music school, where Squidward's face is deformed beyond recognition, his shirt's been ripped, and his baton breaks] Okay, new theory. Maybe we should play so quietly, no one can hear us. 03:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

In the middle of the night, in my dreams, you should see the things we do, baby... In the middle of the night, in my dreams I know I'm gonna be with you!
Are you ready for it? ;) --Sophie (talk) 04:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Counter-Offer
I will unblock you without you having to try on a dress, under one condition. You have to play a session of Dungeons and Dragons with us. So, ready to roll up a character? RoninMacbeth (talk) 04:44, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * He can play the role of the princess! 06:29, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * And that's the beauty of DnD! His character can be anyone he wants, including a princess! RoninMacbeth (talk) 06:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Hey buddy
I'm a real IFB. I also know what you're up to, and it's not frying chicken (I'm deliberately being specific yet vague here so that you know that I know who you are a sockpuppet of without some lame bastard accusing me of doxxing). Guess what? Fuck you and your satirical trolling! (*Gasps* yes, an IFB did really just say that) What a Wonderful World (talk) 13:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Perchance we might believe you Elvis if say, I don't know... You didn't post accusations with one hand and harassment with the other. 13:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not Elvis, I'm someone with CheckUser on another site. Without getting into details, this is a cross-wiki piece of garbage who makes good hand/bad hand accounts. By the way, Mr. Cluck Cluck, have you been loitering around anymore schools to use their wifi, MJ (again, using terms that he will understand without doxxing him)? You know, only perverts loiter around schools. What a Wonderful World (talk) 13:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm being very transparent here, unlike Mr. Cluck Cluck, the obsessed with Elvis and Miss Swift punk we have here. 71.208.106.249 (talk) 13:24, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the IP Elvis. You just made me grin like a shark. 13:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * PS:If EiK is supposedly CS, why oh why, does he (i.e. you) always seem to be the one making the accusations to the same effect? Unless this a new harassment tactic... Hmm... 13:34, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * What are you jabbering about? This is a new account, how am I always the one making the accusations? Wiki administrators in general are clueless, but this place takes it to a new level. I get it though, it's because the guy is a sneaky bastard and you don't have checkuser to connect the dots like I do. The only reason I even care what he does to your site is because I take offense to him acting like he is an IFB with an entire wiki dedicate to his garbage. What a Wonderful World (talk) 13:53, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Tell me this isn't interesting
Same name on this fake IFB church site is blocked on Conservapedia. Why? Because it's the same idiot, and CS acts *exactly* like the "good hand" account acted on Conservapedia before I uncovered his shenanigans with CheckUser. What a Wonderful World (talk) 13:58, 2 June 2018 (UTC)