RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Sex-positivity

Sex-positivity | Result: Keep

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete

 * 1) Short and does no debunking HedvigsenSkreonk here 10:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) See above. Also haven't seen mission justification-Hastur! (talk)  07:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 3) Not really missional. Also, fuck articles with two navbars. 16:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) A relevant topic in countering myths about sex, SWERF bullshit, slut-shaming, and religious anti-sex propaganda, which are very missional subjects. A controversial topic where factual presentation is important. Not a perfect article (needs more discussion of porn and sex work), but it has some information and size is long enough to keep. --Annanoon (talk) 10:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) Seems fine. 19:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 3) Needs more citations, but otherwise OK to keep. Bongolian (talk) 20:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 4) Needs some work, but otherwise relevant enough. 12:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 5) Judge Dredd (talk) 14:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 6) Tuxer (talk) 10:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 7) Things can always be improved.  But I have no problems with this, the fact that is relatively short has no bearing on whether it should be deleted or not. Many articles start as stubs. I would say that "authoritarians"  as a group usually have a problem with anything "sex positive" - so what's not to like?Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 10:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 8) Flandres (talk) 17:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Goat

 * Since it is pretty short, I removed the rating.--HedvigsenSkreonk here 06:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)