RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive126

Gale5050
This third-rate pest is going full fascist. I can't bring up the fact that GC committed vote fraud or he'll block me??? C'mon man! He also blocked me over a reply on my own user page that wasn't even grounds for a block! Time to coop-ban him!! RW cannot remain swarmed with fascists like him! Unclescrooge (talk) 22:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Fraud: A deception practiced in order to induce another to give up possession of property or surrender a right. I did no such thing, I merely enforced the archival policy, nothing more. As for blocking you, I have done no such thing of late.  23:05, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Coop me, Unclescrooge, I dare you. 23:06, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Coop me as well. Maybe then you'll grow up. 23:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm at the point that I'm ready to support any punishment on Scrooge that can muster sufficient votes. 1) Scrooge ignored my advice to take it to ATIM first. 2) Scrooge appears to be making unsubstantiated and serious allegations against a fellow editor. Bongolian (talk) 23:18, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I am unsure what measures should be taken on Gale5050; personally, I believe that I may have a conflict of interest in this discussion so I will avoid it. However, I may have some evidence which may prove useful in this coop case. Gale5050 was indefinitely banned from Wikipedia (w:User:Andrew5, w:User:Gale5050) for sockpuppetry. I also banned Gale5050 from Uncyclopedia (User:Gale5050), under my capacity as a bureaucrat there, for overall disturbance, transphobia and lack of tolerance towards other users. As such, I won't add anything else to the discussion here, but feel free to use the evidence provided either for or against Gale5050's coop case here. Celeste (talk) 23:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I haven't seen Gale break many rules here, as offwiki stuff / possible drama cannot be used to sanction users here. However, that's background information to keep in mind if they do become disruptive in the future. 23:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree. I wanted to bring in the external evidence just to say, that well, at least a couple wikis have shunned 'em before. Celeste (talk) 23:53, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Off wiki stuff is rarely relevant. That 3 year block on Uncyclopedia was also more then other admins said they would have done...until I realized I spammed unfunny short stubs there, that probably also contributed to extra support of the length...I also hope and think I can make a Wikipedia comeback within the next few months per the standard offer they have. Regardless...I must agree that the background of mine only worsens, not improve, my case. Gale5050 (talk) 00:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Anyway, please note that that ban was only 1 hour...effectively, every edit you make "blocks" you for 30 minutes due to the vandal bin, so it wasn't that severe. And there is much more disruption from the user bringing it here. Gale5050 (talk) 00:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Please see this before commenting here also (archived revision as of this posting), it contains very useful back ground info.Gale5050 (talk) 00:08, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * This is stupid. 00:12, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , as this coop was brought up by a disruptive user for a triviality (I reckon this user will be blocked for repeated bullshit coops and other disruptive behavior), I imagine this coop won't last long. I haven't seen anything by you that is coop worthy. PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 00:17, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * This has diverged completely into off-topic discussion and should be quickly archived. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 00:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Of course, due to my obvious conflict of interest, I will not be doing any archiving or taking any action. -Gale5050 (talk) 00:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Please,, stop your disruption, because even the lamest of blocks are justified by now.-Gale5050 (talk) 00:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)