User:Psygremlin/Five concise responses to atheistic arguments

Five concise responses to atheistic arguments is the title of a recent Creation Ministries International article by Dr Robert Carter. In it, he replied to the bleating of a reader, who claimed that on-line atheists were handing him his ass in forums, and set out five simple lies replies to answer any atheists' arguments and no doubt convert them in the process.

The reader claimed: I’m sending this message because others might have the same questions. I was in an online forum when someone said, “There is no god”. I responded, “The fool says in his heart, ‘there is no God.’” There were several replies. I responded, “Your atheism probably exists upon two canards: Big-Bang Theory, and Evolution. Why don’t you research these things out?” Anyway, they said, “Adam and Eve isn’t a very convincing alternative theory.” To which I replied, “Mitochondrial DNA actually points to an Eve” (actually, the Noahic descendants).

My question, in a nutshell, would be, “What are three to five very concise, readily understandable arguments that one can make to an atheist?” I would start with the fact that the Big-Bang begins with two contradictions: the first and second laws of thermodynamics. If you would proceed down a different path, what would that be? I don’t want to win an argument with people, I want to win souls, as it were (fully believing in God using the intellect in the conversion of sinners to Himself). Anyway, I hope that I’m not putting you on the spot, but maybe others have this same question; so you might want to tackle this publicly, if you want.

As always with CMI, he rehashes the same old material, and it's worth picking them apart.