Talk:Hybrid

Yo User:Summa Atheologica, what was objectionable about the addition I made? --85.76.133.56 (talk) 19:06, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The material wasn't even remotely missional and dealt with a subject we don't have an article on. Disambiguation pages are meant to remove ambiguity. 19:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The two others don't have articles either? edit: okay, hybrid cars have --85.76.133.56 (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, but they tie into significant concepts in our articles on those subjects, and have good linking to significant articles. 19:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmm... would it be acceptable to put up a draft for "hybrid threat"? One might be able to make it look at least presentable. I actually already found what looks like a fairly good source to use.
 * Granted, the term may be too nebulous to cover (and I'm not exactly sure what RW might think of what Wikipedia calls original research on a topic like this), so separate articles of what it consists of may be better. --85.76.133.56 (talk) 19:52, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Such an article would be hopelessly off-mission. 20:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Fuck. Well, I guess that's that then, I'll resume my usual routine. --85.76.133.56 (talk) 20:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't see how those edits are off mission. We cover war, propaganda, and crime. This is within reasonable bounds of missionality. 20:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)