User talk:158.222.179.184

Still using "SJW" with a straight face into 2020s? 20:06, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

what do you mean? almost every article on this website has such an extreme slant and it's written in a sort of hyper-partisan way that is common in SJW types (this is a very real phenomenon that many ppl are aware of except maybe you and ppl who are clueless about SJWs on twitter and websites like this). rationalwiki also has a strong elitist bent to it and i would argue pro-deep state e.g. the russian collusion hoax (same ppl who lied about WMD in iraq) is ignored and presented as a "conspiracy theory". nobody reading this website with the exception of ppl who already are fully on board with the SJW/progressive/elitist/establishment ideology believe anything on it, so if your goal is to change ppls minds you might change maybe 1% of ppl reading if that. a blatant example of extreme bias/cluelessness is the tucker carlson article. he is called a fascist and white nationalist when he literally objectively is none of those things (he has denounced racism and white supremacy explicitly several times) and has also denounced fascism and violence. anyway keep sticking your head in the sand about the reality of U.S. politics and continue living in an SJW bubble, but when ppl start fighting back against tyrants like you just don't be surprised.
 * I love how "denounced fascism and violence" and "when ppl start fighting back against tyrants like you" are used in the same paragraph. The derp is deep here! PanGalacticGargleBlaster (talk) 01:16, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * the only derp here is you. i said carlson denounced violence. i fully support violence if it comes to that (hopefully it doesn't). that is what the second amendment is all about and that is why no matter how many mass shootings happen there will be no further gun control, have a nice day. 158.222.179.184 (talk) 01:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It's good that you don't think you are a victim. You are deluded however if you believe people writing their opinions in an online wiki can be properly described as tyrants. No one is demanding that you do anything. I do ask you to take a hike, if that's not too much trouble.Ariel31459 (talk) 01:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * IDK man, I don't think appropriating meaningless internet buzzwords from dated right-wing lexicon to lob accusations on us isn't making you much smarter, neither is repeating it. The only semblance of argument I'm seeing is "Tucker Carlson isn't white supremacist because he said so himself." Even though he says a lot of things ("Great Replacement") usually echoed by... white supremacists. 01:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)