User talk:CheeseburgerFace

=User talk:CheeseburgerFace=

Kirkegaard
Emil Kirkegaard is suing the creator of his RationalWiki article for defamation who in his defence claims he wrote truth and so it will be going to court; there will be more about this online probably in months to come - I thought what was posted was relevant. The bizarre twist is Kirkegaard has been defaming and cyberstalking the article creator for years.Octo (talk) 20:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't see how Kirkegaard doxing you is relevant to the article. It's too introspective and goes into Encyclopedia Dramatica territory. Also, when you add content like that, it comes off that you are seeking revenge against Kierkegaard because he doxed you. 02:10, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

this has bugged me for too long
Just what did you change here and here? —Kazitor 10:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I changed the glass when it was sideways. 00:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * So I'm looking at it again and again, trying to spot the difference, and I just can't. Although it's far from important, could you enlighten me to anything specific? Thanks —Kazitor Kazitor sig pic.png 01:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * On the older versions, note the outline of the empty glass when it is sideways. It's much thicker. This is inconsistent with the line thickness when its rightside up. 11:04, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, I see. I suppose I could have downloaded them and stepped through frame by frame... Thanks for informing me; I am no longer bugged. —Kazitor Kazitor sig pic.png 22:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Look, you're gonna end up banning me
And it's because I'm going to have to ignore your modding because you pay no actual attention to the content in dispute.

In what world is putting "bullshit laden" on a talk page worse than "women have tiny brains" on an article? This user has editted exactly one article, cognitive difference between sexes, and every edit with bioessentiallist overinterpretation or direct misrepresentation of science. And right now, you're being a damn shitty mod.

I don't care to pay attention to your "dons mod hat" power trips when you pay zero attention to context. It's a waste of both our time. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 14:19, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It's kind of hard to pay attention to or care what you have to say when you spew in a majority of talk page discussion. Perhaps you should work on your anger issues? People like you are the reason why this website has the reputation of a liberal echo chamber. 01:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Dehumanization
,, , , ,

Conservative Americans are not human beings as we understand the term.

This is too much. -Lankaster (talk) 17:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * is correct. Normal human beings, with this little thing called empathy don't just sit back, watch innocent people who only want a better life for themselves and/or their families getting hurt, and then turn around and try to defend the people hurting the innocents. It's the same internal logic Christians use to try to justify the Biblical flood. So yeah, fuck conservatives. If this what they want, fuck'em, we'd be better off without them. 17:28, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Stop bothering me with petty shit, . That comment was not on a mainspace page and was not harassment. If you don't understand satire, go read A Modest Proposal For preventing the Children of Poor People From being a Burthen to Their Parents or Country, and For making them Beneficial to the Publick. Bongolian (talk) 17:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Aww, was ikanreed being a meanie-pants again? 17:33, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You have so much empathy that you think ikanreed is correct to classify certain people as non-human being. Don't you see the irony that you should classify yourself as non-human being because of your lack of empathy?
 * "That comment was not on a mainspace page and was not harassment" So what? Can we write "X are not human beings as we understand the term" (substitute X with any category of people) if it is not on the mainspace?
 * "If you don't understand satire" There's nothing in this thread that makes thinking ikanreed is acting in a satirical way. -Lankaster (talk) 17:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't have empathy anymore. Haven't since mid-2016. If people want to kill off their own future, fine. They don't get to touch mine though. More specifically, I view the entire immigration debate as one giant, sick, twisted, joke. I laugh at people who try to debate whether helping others is right or wrong. I laugh when the "secure the boarder!!" types spout vapid praise for their country, then seem surprised when other people listen. I laughed at the kids in cages, because why the hell not? I laugh at this whole sick twisted farce because it's either that or curl up in the fetal position and cry. I don't have empathy, I have a gaping hole where that empathy used to be and where a shit-ton of apathy now resides. I'm in my mid 20s, and I already want to die. I want this whole world to die. It's a mercy compared to this sick joke we're all living in. 19:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * "I don't have empathy, I have a gaping hole where that empathy used to be and where a shit-ton of apathy now resides. I'm in my mid 20s, and I already want to die. I want this whole world to die." These look like symptoms of some psychological problems. You should seek help from an expert, seriously.


 * I'll stop engaging in discussions with you since it seems to aggravate your situation. -Lankaster (talk) 20:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * "These look like symptoms of some psychological problems." Really? You're just now realizing just how nihilistic, fatalistic, and cynical I am? Gee, thanks for noticing. I mean the fucked up world we live in couldn't possibly have anything to do with my feelings on the matter. But, yeah, I need help, not the fucked up world that fucked me up to begin with... Fucking moron... 20:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I am done playing nice to conservatives myself. I myself don't think advocating killing them is appropriate but the best we can do is strip them from their power. But I am not wasting breath sticking up for people who vote for thoroughly awful treatment for other human beings out of a false sense of nostalgia of a past that really never existed. 22:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Just one more thing. I'm noting you're quote-mining the part of my statement that you think indicates that I have issues (no shit Sherlock), leaving out the rest of what I said, which for the record explains how I got to where I am. Just thought I'd point that out. 23:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Ah, this sort of toxic nonsense is why CheeseburgerFace is spending less time here at Rational Wiki. I mean, really! I just got back from watching and reading about NASA's latest achievement. This is just sad and laughable! Just remember the golden rule: Treat others the way you want to be treated. Nerd (talk) 02:13, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry? If you want I'll archive it and end the thread. 02:18, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't be, mate! Let's leave it for CheeseburgerFace to decide. Nerd (talk) 04:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * "Ah, this sort of toxic nonsense is why CheeseburgerFace is spending less time here at Rational Wiki" I don't know if this is true. However I hope that by "toxic nonsense" you are referring to ikanreed statement, and not to me contacting the moderators. If a remember well, in the past you pointed to the essay about RW having an image problem. Do you see that as long as statements like "Conservative Americans are not human beings" (and jokes about the problems that would be solved by killing conservatives) are tolerated by RW moderation, the image can only get worse? -Lankaster (talk) 18:49, 27 November 2018 (UTC)