Talk:Red Room/Archive1

Source standards
Guys, please be lenient about my sourcing quality here. If I had all quality sources to use I'd be writing this page on Wikipedia. Instead I'm using this as a place to gather the info available to produce original analysis. Deku-shrub (talk) 21:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * We aren't the land of "not good enough for wikipedia"--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 21:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I know that you are but what am I? Deku-shrub (talk) 21:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll say this Again - RW is not your "I'm not good enough for Wp so instead i'll shit on this website" and if you treat it that way, you'll find nothing good of your effort. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 22:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Deku-shrub (talk) 22:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

What is the subject of this article?
As well as red rooms (as defined in the opening sentences) this page now covers epistolary novels, chain letters & various horror movies that don't actually have a red room or equivalent. This doesn't read like a coherent article on a clear subject, but rather a collection of thoughts about unconnected (or at best vaguely connected) ideas within popular culture. In my view, it either needs a clear focus or should be moved in essay space. 18:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm writing an essay. I like the wiki format to do so. When you're writing about a belief and not a real thing, the background on those beliefs become paramount. How can you debate a Christian without knowing the Bible etc etc Deku-shrub (talk) 18:28, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Then move this to essay:red room. 19:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)