User talk:Catgrrl37-0

Can't believe someone didn't do this already. — Oxyaena Harass  19:05, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
— Oxyaena Harass  19:05, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Unsolicited editing advice
Based on looking at some of your recent article work, I am noticing a pattern of strong opinion pieces. To make a good article, avoid telling people what to think. Provide the facts, and let the audience come to their own conclusions. Tulpa001 (talk) 02:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I'll ease off ok Catgrrl37-0 (talk) 17:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

FYI
it seems mostly your work, so heres a heads up https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Articles_for_deletion/CosmicSkeptic AMassiveGay (talk) 20:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Stop it
stop making baseless accusations purely because they 'follow' someone on youtube or even worse dont discuss something in line with your own politics. AMassiveGay (talk) 11:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Fine,, i'l stop. But it is deeply disturbing to me that stampy, a youtuber with a huge audience of young children would follow RIchard Dawkns on Twitter, and that kids could be reading his tweets and listening to his Islamophobia and this behavior must be called out when it happens. Catgrrl37-0 (talk) 18:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

How am I, a transwoman, a truscum/transphobe?
Just curious. — Oxyaena Harass  15:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * What? I don't understand Catgrrl37-0 (talk) 18:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Hiya! Just a heads up...
I reverted your edits to the BreadTube article. Adding a section on who ISN'T a BreadTuber is like adding a section to the Gun article about things that aren't guns. "This is a spear! NOT fire arm!" It was also very opinionated (which I see Tulpa already talked to you about) and it was also very critical of people who don't happen to align with your politics (which I see AMassiveGay already talked to you about). If you would like to make a case as to why we should have such a subsection, feel free to chat on the talkpage.

Peace! - Rairyu75  ( Talk ) 18:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok sorry Catgrrl37-0 (talk) 00:07, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi
Hi,

I wanted to let you know that I have just reverted your recent changes to Australian Greens because they seemed strongly opinionated, and did not appear constructive. -- Goatspeed. 02:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

About your edits
Hello, Catgrrl37-o,

A lot of your edits don't meet Rationalwiki's mission statement, being heavily opinionated and overtly biased. While rationalwiki undeniably has a left wing slant (it's not conservapedia after all,) you need to contribute more than x is good/bad otherwise it negatively contributes to the site as a whole and turns pages into an echo chamber.

You haven't done anything wrong, but you might want to cool down with some of your edits before one of the higher ups gets annoyed with you.

Have a good day, Aspieduck
 * Erm, yeah, what Aspie said. If you want, I can take you under my metaphorical wing and you can help me do stuff. I'm generally pretty nice. Twodots (talk) 02:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Knock it off
It's come to my attention that today you've been adding a whole bunch of category tags in highly opinionated and problematic/whitewashy ways in a very short period of time. Others with more patience than moi have already told you (often on this very page) to stop pushing your ideological puritanism onto our site. Simply disagreeing with people doesn't make them "libertarian wingnuts", agreeing with them doesn't make them "smart", and criticism of a seventh-century ideology is not bigotry. We're getting a bit tired of your bullcrap. -- Goatspeed. 03:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

ATIM case
Hi,

I wanted to let you know that an ATIM case involving you has just been raised by moi. Feel free to go and defend yourself there. -- Goatspeed. 23:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Oof. Twodots (talk) 23:23, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Your user page
00:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm an anarchist, so exactly what point are you trying to make? Catgrrl37-0 (talk) 00:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry, wasn't aware of your specific diagnosis. Just taking umbrage with generalized statements. Though considering your ill thought off attempt to create the "intelligent people" category, I'd like you to justify the existence of a number of non anarchist people that you tried to insert to it. Which is to say, all of them. 00:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Vaush is an anarchist. And non-anarchists can be intelligent as long as they aren't tankies, liberals, anything right-of-center, centrists, or social democrats who are too close to the center. They are not as good as anarchists though and I was going to add more people, including anarchists, but couldn't because the category was deleted before I had time to add them! Catgrrl37-0 (talk) 00:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Well there's another fun generalized statement. No-one who is liberal or right of center can be intelligent. Hell, I take umbrage even with the "tankies" argument. I don't think you understand the meaning of the word "intelligence".
 * Anyway, I need to go to sleep soon and I'd rather not spend the time before it arguing with an (allegedly) certified moron. G'night. 00:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * “Only the people I like are intelligent” 01:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Note
Because of your edits to and time on the wiki,  has been added to your user rights. If you have questions, bleat ask away. Judge Dredd (talk) 13:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

You should join my Discord
It'll be a lot friendlier to transgender anarchists than this shithole. My username on Discord is. DM me on there please. — Oxyaena Harass  07:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm not transgender I'm a cis woman Catgrrl37-0 (talk) 08:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, be careful in future because now your discord username will be permanently visible in case anyone wants to check back through the history of this page Catgrrl37-0 (talk) 10:39, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Are you a troll/parodist?
Because edits like this seriously make me question whether you're on the up and up. 19:23, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It's Oxy's sock. Expect nothing else. CoryUsar (talk) 19:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * That's an assertion without evidence. And I wasn't asking you, I was asking them. Now shoo. 19:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It's clearly not Oxy's sock. She's very opinionated about certain things, and never fails to mention them. She has never mentioned how capitalism is fatphobic. If she used the word "ableist," then maybe. Also, their writing style is completely different. IveBeenFrank (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree; Catgrrl's more of a tankie than an ancom; while CG is also obsessively passionate, she feels far more compelled to push her personal preferences onto our site. Just because you and Oxy have a longstanding grudge against each other doesn't mean this small far-left brigade must be all her doing. -- Goatspeed. 22:57, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'M NOT A TANKIE Catgrrl37-0 (talk) 05:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)