File:Karajou takes ball goes home.png

Why are you removing stuff from a talk page?
Noticed this here, talk pages should not be tampered with. DLerner 12:48, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
 * I didn't remove anything from a talk page, and you better get your facts together before you accuse anyone else in the future. Karajou 13:04, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Um, yes you did. Look at the link I provided above. I didn't accuse you, I asked you, please stop the saber-rattling. DLerner 13:10, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Um, no I didn't, and this is the last time you accuse me or anyone else of this again. You're stopping your sabre-rattling now.  Karajou 13:11, 30 August 2008 (EDT)


 * For the record, when I made my reply to Dwain in the above page, your lines were never there. Karajou 13:18, 30 August 2008 (EDT)

Which lines? I've looked through the log, and based on the timestamps, I don't understand how my lines weren't there.

Content that was removed:


 * Yes, It was the name of a Russian spacecraft but I changed my username because it meant something dirty in another language. Dwain 12:20, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
 * What? :) DLerner 12:25, 30 August 2008 (EDT)

Please stop threatening me, I'm not afraid of you. I simply want to know why innocuous remarks like that get removed from a talk page. I also want to know why you keep insisting you didn't remove it, when there is a log that says you did! DLerner 13:25, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
 * First of all, I didn't remove them; I had no reason whatsoever to do so. Second, you're picking a fight with me over it and I'm not going to tolerate that in the least.  Karajou 13:31, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Well then, let's find out who did, shall we. I'm not picking a fight, I asked a question that based on the logs is correct, and you tell me to get my facts straight. Well, I double and triple checked my facts, and it says in the revision history for 2008-08-30T12:30:48 by User:Karajou that this line was added:
 * You may want to include a small statement on each article talk page as to authorship, where it came from, etc. There's no problem with this one. Karajou 12:30, 30 August 2008 (EDT)

And what I quoted above was removed, perhaps you did it accidentally, or the site had a glitch, EITHER WAY, the content is missing.

If you insist you didn't remove it, fine, I'll restore it then. Godspeed. DLerner 13:38, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Then restore it and quit wasting my time responding to your nonsense. Karajou 13:42, 30 August 2008 (EDT)

You are both guilty of assuming the worst. DLerner, you did accuse Karajou; your first post in this section was not a question. Rather than ask why he removed them, you told him that he shouldn't be removing them. And Karajou, rather than look at the evidence and accept you did remove them, albeit accidentally and unwittingly, you assumed the worst about DLerner; that he was trying to make trouble. Philip J. Rayment 20:02, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
 * I assumed the worst about this individual because the worst is what he displays on a constant basis, and you Phillip will contact me in private from now on if you have an issue with me. Karajou 12:00, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Responding to your public message to me, I did contact you in private, and explained why I also posted here in public. Philip J. Rayment 12:04, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You heard me. if you don't like it, then leave Conservapedia.  Karajou 12:08, 1 September 2008 (EDT)