Talk:The Age of Reason

Delete?
Could someone with more experience of these matters weigh in on this? I just fail to see the point of reproducing an entire work as an article here. Jammy (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree. There are plenty of sources for this important work. We don't need to be another. Side by siding it with an eye toward refuting fundie and right wing spin would be a welcome but ambitious project, but just slapping it up there is unnecessary. This is an important work to discuss. Not so much to reproduce. ÑR /Señor Admin/Talk 14:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * (EC)Well it is PD so its not like it is a copyright violation, however sitting there with no commentary we are not adding anything that a link to another site with the content would not provide. 14:41, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The fact that it was a drive by edit by DataTroll - well, the name says it all. I concur. Jack Hughes (talk) 14:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Does that mean we can nuke it? Can we? Can we? Huh? Huh? Can we? How about now? And now? Are we there yet? -- PsyGremlin  14:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Well we need an article on this, just not the one we currently have. Anyone willing to read it all and provide a lengthy commentary on it (no need to publish it in full) is welcome to start hacking. 14:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Not needed unless there's a side by side or something similar. I'd rather see a precis in Thomas Paine. Nuke it (for now). 14:52, 9 July 2010 (UTC) TerrySmall.png [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]]