Talk:Volapük

Missionality
New Age bearing, perhaps. Not sure about missionality. 05:51, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Are we really going to turn "missionality" into a serious criterion? Shall we just delete the whole "Fun:" namespace now? -- 01:34, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Esperanto has had a page since Dec '07, and is basically the same principle.  02:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Sed Esperanto estas multe bona, kaj la nova mundlingvo. Volapük estas sole la stupida ideo de stupida pastro. Tiel, esperanto estas OK para la wikio, kaj Volapük estas elen. -- 09:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Missionality is already a serious criterion (why would we have a mission template if it wasn't?), but only in a very general sense. This article needn't be mission-tagged, though. Rescinding now. 04:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't really understand why this article was kept. Is there any point? Volapük may have been promoted as an international language ~100 years ago, but nowadays it seems people speak it just for fun.--Кřěĵ (ṫåɬк) 10:35, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Esperanto. Lojban. E-Prime. Volapük. Existing languages are probably on-mission. Languages created for a purpose are certainly on-mission. 15:45, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Which 'two English words' - and did anyone consider the reforms Double Dutch? Anna Livia (talk) 14:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)