User talk:Nintendo Fan

wtf is going on, this Oxyaena person, who appears to be a drama queen, blocks me as being a sock of some guy from Florida, and then Cosmikdebris blocks me for trolling because I appealed Oxyaena's mistaken block. Neither one of these people appear to be moderators. Can a moderator seriously review these people's actions? I don't think they should be sysops. I've never been blocked on any other wiki, and I don't understand any of this. Nintendo Fan (talk) 17:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, can you direct us to the account that was blocked. The only contributions from this one are complaining about being blocked, which is unhelpful for assessing whether it was a fair block.  ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 17:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The first thing you do is troll the Mod talk page and mention me almost immediately. Fuck off. — Oxyaena Harass  17:14, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * My apologies. I did mention my account, User:Chicken Bones, in my original post, but apparently that went unnoticed. That is my nickname. I am autistic and fail at these things at times, please forgive me for that. I was just curious why the chicken coop is being replaced with ATIM. I did not attack Oxyaena before he/she blocked me, but I find his/her aggressive behavior towards me upsetting, and after observing their behavior overall, I think they are disruptive and should not be a sysop. Nintendo Fan (talk) 17:41, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm having a hard time believing a an account solely consisting of complaining about moderation practices was made in good faith, but I'm also not seeing disruptive behavior. Anyone for "Parole to vandal bin, and then free from that for good behavior"?  ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 17:57, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I respectfully disagree with the vandal bin approach. There's a pattern here of dozens of anonymous users and throwaway accounts coming in and saying "Oxyaena is bad and he blocked me." I took the earlier block action because of this pattern. Now, if Nintendo Fan a.k.a. Chicken Bones has a problem with this, they should provide specific links as to why they have a problem with Oxyaena's earlier actions. We can't do the research for them. If they are unwilling or unable to do this, I stand by my block action.
 * It is obvious that one or more people out there have a serious issue with Oxyaena for some reason, and it is obvious that they come here to harass them. I am willing to give Nintendo Fan a.k.a. Chicken Bones the benefit of the doubt if they can provide a valid reason. Otherwise I will assume they are not acting in good faith, have come in here to be a troll and waste everyone's time, and deserve immediate kickbanning upon sight. Cosmikdebris (talk) 18:34, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * This user only shows up immediately upon me making a mod page post, it should be obvious this is just one of our friends wasting our goddamn time. This harassment is uncalled for. Hell it's getting to the point I might leave RationalWiki, I have enough shit to deal with as it is. — Oxyaena Harass  19:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

[Https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&diff=2097813&oldid=2097791 Oxyaena wasn't even specifically mentioned] until he/she blocked me with very inflamatory language accusing me of being a sockpuppet. All I did was ask a question about the chicken coop and suggest we just delete it. Or it could just be decommissioned and kept for historical purposes. Honestly, given the circumstances, who in my shoes wouldn't be pissed off at Oxyaena? Maybe if (s)he would be a little more civil when accusing someone of something with zero evidence people wouldn't get pissed off at him/her? Nintendo Fan (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure, some drive-by red link guy with a bland user name drops a dubious question, that's not suspicious at all. 19:51, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Let's take this in a direction that gives them a chance to re-establish a sense of good faith. What are you interested in contributing here?  ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:28, 25 July 2019 (UTC)