Template talk:Cpmothball

Conservapedia isn't "essentially dead" - it is as alive and kicking as ever. It just isn't interesting as they don't come up with any new ways to embarrass themselves any more.  ħ uman  04:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * You're right; good rewrite. 05:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. These things often take a few people working together over multiple drafts to get write. Like, in this case, fixing my multiple speling erors!  ħ uman [[Image:human sig talk.gif|link=User talk:Human|User talk:Human]] 16:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Should we perhaps change the wiki-jargon phrase "Conservapedia-space" to the more layperson-friendly "Conservapedia-related"?  ħ uman  16:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yep! 17:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)