User talk:99.203.17.97

You people have read the Verse "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself". So, conservstives, liberals, and moderates shoild all be kind to each other. And you should stop with the "snark" ans rudeness and falsehood, and Conservapedia shoild be more honest and stop changing the Bible to fit their agenda. Wikipedia editors should stay calm and simply state policies and avoid insults.

And I acknolegde evolution is a good scientific theory that explains things assuming both methological naturlaism and uniformitarianism. However, the Bible offers an exapanation that does not assume these two things (and is not science) and we beleive it by faith. Science us not evreything. If the world has not always run under the smae laws, then evolution could be wrong. And sorry abouthe many creationists who unfortubaty try to falsly claim cretaion as science or evolitoon as pseudoscience. Like conservapedia. I underatand the need for neutrality in the scientific community and do not force them to treat bible as science. We ought to rather trust thebible as
 * Goodness sake! Please check your spelling! Nerd (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The language butchery, it burns!!!! Save me !!!! 21:56, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Somebody save me! I just woke up in Smallville! How far am I from Gotham City? I just wanna go home! Nerd (talk) 22:07, 30 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Outise science the divine revelation that complemts human knowledge.


 * Why not read the bible and trust it rather than spend the time on insulting others? Let us cease from "snark" and do unto others as we would have others do unto us.
 * I read the Bible, it's why I'm no longer a Christian. 22:00, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, guy, but I worship the true God. The Great and Terrible Sky Goat. Tremble before Him!!!! Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano Make a Reservation  22:01, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * As I said, abandon "snark". It is only.offnesive to others. Then read again som or daughter of Noah. Read how our first parents disobeyed the Cretaor and ruined themselves and now man is but a shadow of his former self. And Jesus payed the penalty for the sins of a select few who do not even deserbe mercy but rather punishment. So we mist show mercy to the sinners in return to having been grnatd mercy and hope God chose them. Maybe you will change. You do agree regardless that we should love our enemies and also treat others the way we wnat to be treated? And we have all sinned?
 * Ah "sin", a lovely nebulious concept with zero concrete meaning beyond "I don't like it"... I was in my early teens when I read the Bible, I got to the bit about Noah and how the supposedly All knowing, all powerful, all loving God supposedly drowned everyone. If that's your "good" I'll stick with what I had before that, where I know it's wrong to murder everyone because they aren't doing exactly what you want. (or maybe they are...) 22:26, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, for the love of Aphrodite, get yourself a spellchecker! Nerd (talk) 22:09, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * But what if my neighbours have completely different tastes to me?
 * However - I am willing to treat everybody else with the courtesy and helpfulness I wish to have shown towards me (unless they go out of their way to be annoying, when I will try to ignore or avoid them).
 * God (according to the definition used at the start of this thread) created us in his image; we sin (using a particular definition of this term) - so is it 'a bad syllogism' to say that God #must# be a sinner? Anna Livia (talk) 10:01, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * However - I am willing to treat everybody else with the courtesy and helpfulness I wish to have shown towards me (unless they go out of their way to be annoying, when I will try to ignore or avoid them).
 * God (according to the definition used at the start of this thread) created us in his image; we sin (using a particular definition of this term) - so is it 'a bad syllogism' to say that God #must# be a sinner? Anna Livia (talk) 10:01, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

And you do agree that science is but a drop of water and that there may be more to the uniberse than what we can sense? And whether you choose tehistic evolution or a non-evolution, there surely must be some higher being outside of time to have created the material world and surley a human must have something behind it if this Wiki also had to be created by someone. And a spreadsheet had to be created. It could not have just randomly been put together as the computer crashed or anything. A man created it. And a man is mor ecomplex than RationalWiki or a spreadsheet. Is it not obbious there must be somethong beyond science and human knowledge?99.203.17.97 (talk) 22:21, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Of course there is something beyond science and human knowledge! It's called the Great and Terrible Sky Goat, and He demands your worship. Abandon your false God and praise the Sky Goat! Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano  Make a Reservation  22:24, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The Bible is a book filled with lies. Jesus did NOT die for our sins; he is a pretender. In reality, the Great Sky Goat washed away the sins of humanity with a wave of cleansing goat diarrhea. And so we have all been saved. All you must do is worship the One who did the saving. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano  Make a Reservation  22:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Many people will accept that 'There is more to heaven and earth than in present (scientific) philosophy' (does it explain beauty, humour, wonder...?) but not that 'God' is necessarily the explanation for such aspects. Anna Livia (talk) 10:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)