Template talk:Welkome

Someone is convinced that there are already too many editors here... ;-) Editor at CPfor a change 09:30, 7 April 2008 (EDT)


 * Just covering our Asses! SusanG 09:34, 7 April 2008 (EDT)

Delete
Personal vanity template, that does not further the goals of RW at all, just the ranting of one user. Serves no general good...  ħ uman  02:16, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Look @ the history, it's got your input. 02:19, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Er, to fix the width? It's junk, delete it, or defend it.  ħ uman  02:22, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
 * No to add contewnt 02:26, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Looks like I mostly reduced cwowntwewnt? Anyway, this template is silly.  ħ uman  02:40, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Look H, we all know that you're always right so delete it. 02:41, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, let's have cup of tea and reconsider ;) I be gone for mine...  ħ uman  02:43, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
 * AND if you stick things on a template that's transcluded, as this one is, then PLEASE noinclude 'em. 10:26, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
 * I must say this template doesn't do a lot for me.--Bobbing up 10:37, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

As there's been no action, I suggest removing the delete template, even if this doesn't get used again. 19:54, 22 January 2009 (EST)
 * Well, the template is there if someone wants to use it. If they don't want to use it, they don't use it. So I assume keep?  A rmondiko V  User_Talk:Armondikov 09:09, 23 January 2009 (EST)
 * This is way better than the welcome/IP one. I'm using this one from now on for anonymous editors. - User   09:18, 23 January 2009 (EST)