User talk:Eythorh92

Feminist agenda? Grow up. Christopher (talk) 08:47, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Grow up? really have i demonstrated immaturity? and even if a had explain to me where i was wrong?
 * The dedication i have seen here to alter reality to fit your (narrow and sexist) narrative is astonishing, and if that's what you want to do, no matter how fundamentally wrong i think that is its still in your right to do so. Naming the site rationalwiki.org however, though in no way forbidden (and kinda redundant seeing as scientologists could just as well make site with the same title and make articles about how ignorant everyone else is for not realizing the undeniable truth of galactic lord Xenu). it invites Challenge.
 * And ill be fair most of what is on here is nowhere near as bat shit insane as scientology, although a lot of your tactics on here are very similar. For example if someone points out falsehoods, clear hypocrisy or in any way makes his opposition to your (narrow and sexist) opinions known he is labeled a supressive person, i'm sorry i meant a rape supporting misogynist. I remember it wasn't that long ago when the leading agenda of a feminist was gender equality, that's simply not the case anymore, and i know you call it a straw-man to claim feminism has moved from that to female supremacy, but how exactly is that wrong? Am my eyes just fucking with me when i read implications that all men eather are rapists or at the very least support rape, and then i read the "not all men" section in the "rape culture" article. So when you claim that the half of the population are complete monsters and somebody mentions that just tiny part of men, nay, if he implies that any men are not guilty of rape or supporting rape he is silencing an important discussion?
 * so when you say "not all muslims" aren't you supporting islamic terrorism?&mdash; Unsigned, by: Eythorh92 / talk / contribs
 * On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes ( ~ ) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) Thank you. I reverted your edits because I saw some ridiculous things like "feminist agenda" in them. If you actually have a point to make, make it on the relevant talk pages first. (If whatever you're saying isn't bullshit then it'll be added to the article, however, I strongly suspect it is.) Christopher (talk) 12:46, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ok feminist agenda nonsense? every single special interest group since the beginning of human history has had some agenda or another (i challange you to name one exception) and the agenda of a group can very often be discovered by analyzing the behavior of the group. now if you claim that this website doesn't promote the feminist agenda. yet when we look at noted figures on this site its quite clear that "feminists" are given a very favorable review while those who critcs feminists or social justice warriors (no matter how legit that criticism may be) is labeled a misogynist and bigot.

ps. the in brackets observations i made, them being erased was always something i knew would happen and i agree on the ground that they were very unprofessionally inserted. I Was curious if it would get you to correct the blaitent falsehoods i adressed but telling me to grow up i guess was more inportant.&mdash; Unsigned, by: 46.182.191.225 / talk / contribs
 * On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes ( ~ ) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) Thank you. Christopher (talk) 14:03, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * We do promote the "feminist agenda" because it is an agenda of wanting equality. There are a tiny minority who believe in female superiority and we don't support them. And please don't say women already have equality because they don't. It's better than it was, but they don't. Christopher (talk) 14:07, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Banned
You've been banned for around an hour. Not for your views on feminism (whatever they are) but for inserting random things into articles about how sexist rationalwiki is or something. You can protest this ban on your talk page (I think, sorry if you can't). Christopher (talk) 14:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Your ban has expired. You can contribute nuggets of wisdom such as this again. Thank you so much for contributing to this project. Christopher (talk) 15:22, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

==== so let me see if i got this straight labeling pretty much everything a man does a sexism= empowered feminist cracking down on the patriarcy. but mentioning the sexism that men face in large part as a backlash from a hate group that has attached it self to something that use to be a noble struggle for equal gender rights. i not only get silenced i get banned? you tell those who don't agree with you to grow up the take away there voice so i guess coming from a feminist or "sjv's any sort of bigotry is allowed as long as its towards a white male. but just pointing out that that is indeed bigotry and sexism you can't have that now can you. you are pathetic, dispiclable hypocrits who make it a point to decunstruct every word a white male says to proove that he is racist woman hating rape supporter (like saying hello to his black female coworker who just wanted to be left alone :O) and of course you will say im making this up but the rest of this website doesn't seem to support that. but i guess that's just my white male privelidge and deep down because im male and not to mention white (i mean how evil can one guy be) im only interested in keeping the woman opressed by... w8 explain how women in the developed world are opressed?. if you're answer is the pay gap then tell me one place that actually hires women for 75% the salary he hires a man and i would also be intersted to know why would that company hire a man? or is there a chance that that number may be taken nfrom a national avarage over all men and women regardless of occupation education or infact anything other the gender. its strange how you always hear about women getting 75 cents for the man 1 dollar but no body has been able to name one single workplace where this happends. i repeat how can you call yourself rational if you react to opposing opinion with censorship, while promoting bigotry of that sort. Shame on you&mdash; Unsigned, by: Eythorh92 / talk / contribs
 * On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes ( ~ ) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) Thank you.     I didn't ban you because of your views but because you were spamming. Christopher (talk) 16:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

==== hateful rederic ok. pointing it out = banned =fasishm ==== so what you are saying is that a tiny part of feminism today (that part being almost every modern feminist that has ever mentioned men on social media) tiny part??? so im guessing all those modern feminists who fight for equality instead of female supremacy just dont speak out? dont nfucking bullshit me saying that the most promanent part of the movement is a tiny part. First of its very dishonest and it makes you look like disengenuane

Not too long ago i was made aware of a fundraiser orginiced by many of the atheists that have been labeled here as misogynistic anty feminists. This was to raise money to help young girls and woman who are really being opressed under sharia law. Anita Sarkeesian meenwhile gets 200k dollars from kickstarter and uses it to make extreamly low budget videos on how video game portray women. If this does not shame you people you truly have no shame because you're selfish fucking morons (sorry bout the morons part but its truly the nicest choice for you reprihensible scumbags) fuck you im out -Eyþór Helgason&mdash; Unsigned, by: Eythorh92 / talk / contribs
 * On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes ( ~ ) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) Thank you.     (Just in case you decide to come back and and bless us with your genius). Christopher (talk) 16:49, 12 March 2017 (UTC)