User talk:CPalmer

I know you say that this is just a place holder to prevent impersonation but you'll find we're pretty friendly if you do decide to come and join the mob. Silver Sloth 06:40, 16 January 2009 (EST)
 * Indeed! Welcome. Plus, why would we impersonate you here, when we're having much more fun watching TK impersonate some strange Himmler/Stalin hybrid over there. --PsyGremlinWhut? 06:44, 16 January 2009 (EST)
 * Many thanks for the warm and speedy welcome - your goodwill is much appreciated.--CPalmer 06:55, 16 January 2009 (EST)

so how do you like rationalwiki?
so do you like it here?Waronstupidity (talk) 09:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Sure, yeah it's brill.--CPalmer (talk) 09:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Sure you're a creationist.....
.......but you a funny ol' chap! Acei9 09:47, 27 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Finally, proof that there is a God.--CPalmer (talk) 10:16, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

So...
does this mean that CP has lost their longest-serving and most unappreciated editor? So now it really is just the parodists and insane left. Must admit, you were a pleasure to work with over there. -- PsyGremlin  10:20, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * But please, no more lists. EddyP (talk) 10:29, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I must admit, I'm sure it was just a horrible coincidence, but the minute you added somebody's name to your "my fave CPers" list, they were doomed. -- PsyGremlin  10:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Were you on Conservapedia once? What was your user name?--CPalmer (talk) 11:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I was the best damn sysop they've ever had. -- PsyGremlin  18:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Formal coming out time? EddyP (talk) 18:39, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I somehow doubt that, Psy.--CPalmer (talk) 10:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, well Terry and JPratt think that's the case, so it must be true! Oh and seeing as Douglas has deleted all her stuff from CP, I'm sure there's no problem adding her articles to ASoK. @Eddy - I thought it was the worst-kept secret by now. -- PsyGremlin  12:58, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You made it a bit obvious for everyone who didn't know when you gave us all the sooper seekrit discussions JessicaT had access to until she was desysopped for fighting TK. Hopefully JacobB can fill in the blanks from then on. (Also, I always got the impression that my ETrundel sock messed things a bit up for you, sorry about that.)EddyP (talk) 20:14, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, but if you look closely, you'll see all those ZB messages seem to come from Terry's gmail account. I was just the enabler, so to speak. And no, you had nothing to do with it, it was my standing up to TK that did it, although Ed poor helped with a knife to the back. -- PsyGremlin  11:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, he said she said. I don't believe you're Jessica any more than I believe you're me, as you have also claimed.--CPalmer (talk) 13:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I don't think you're a parodist
In fact I really like you. Ace McAntisocial (talk) 04:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Ace!--CPalmer (talk) 15:02, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Huzzah!
Seriously, congratulations. Getting Andy to buy into the whole "hearsay" claptrap, is the most beautiful thing I've seen on CP since the days of Bugler. I know you did out of frustration at AugustO's continuing questioning, but the way it's blossomed is just awesome. So now, CP will never need another citation again and Andy's crazy will know no bounds.

Once again, congratulations!! -- PsyGremlin  15:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

What gives??
I'm confused. Not, really.

You've been on CP since 5 September 2008, back at a time when there was something of a community left at CP. At that time, you beetled around, working on categories and things like pantomime. Eventually you received rights in Aug 2011, when CP was dead in the water. Since then, you stomp around like a little storm trooper, you come up with crazy shit like the hearsay society and you defend Ken's 'atheists are fat! hur! hur!" crap.

I can't decide if you've left your end game too late, or if you're a power-mad little tosser. -- PsyGremlin  13:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Mind your language, please.
 * If you think the Hearsay society article is "crazy", and you're sure you haven't been brainwashed by Wikipedia, then perhaps you are reading what you think I've written, rather than what I've actually written.
 * Storm trooper, honestly.--CPalmer (talk) 13:01, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * "you're sure you haven't been brainwashed by Wikipedia"... yeah, because why should Andy have to provide sources for the crap he makes up? Seriously, you believe citations are bad? And that CP is even fit to eat the black stuff between WP's toes?
 * And yes, Storm trooper... your comments to other editors are only slightly less distasteful than TK's. Amazing, considering how used to have to put up with his crap. Still, at least Jess was there to look out for the little people. -- PsyGremlin  13:24, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Wasn't going to reply but you really cannot compare me to TK. I only block for vandalism, I am courteous, I explain myself and respect different points of view. I was just having some fun with "Fernando Torez" because he was so obviously a bogus account. You have been much ruder to me in this exchange than I have ever been on Conservapedia.--CPalmer (talk) 14:14, 4 July 2012 (UTC)