User talk:Arthropleura/Archive3

You might ♥ Karajou
Two links, if first fails, second is the image itself.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Sabretooth.JPG

http://www.conservapedia.com/images/5/53/Sabretooth.JPG

Nice work, eh?  ħ uman  23:40, 9 February 2009 (EST)

Userboxen
Rather than make separate pages for the userboxes you made that are only displayed on your user page, you should just put the code on your user page on its own. 16:48, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Someone else might want to use it. Why not just make a page? --"CURtalk 16:50, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Since no-one else has used them, it is rather pointless. Moreover, many of them are rather specific to you. 16:53, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Actually, only Rodney and the cheetah haven't been used by someone else. --"CURtalk 16:55, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Isn't that the point of userboxes, that they tend to be rather personal? But since we tend to share many traits with others, someone else might find our creations handy.  When I made the "handy" userbox, the same argument could have been made, but someone else (here or at CP?) has used it.  As long as CUR is putting them in the right place ("template:user XXX") and adding them to the userbox lists, I see no harm at all.  ħ uman  17:02, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Very well, but I've replaced user cheetah with the more general user animal. 17:05, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Leave it alone. I mean, really. What's the problem? --"CURtalk 17:05, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * That many people have favourite animals that aren't cheetahs, and it is silly not to cater for them. 11:22, 11 February 2009 (EST)

http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Felidae&curid=78207&diff=314603&oldid=312144
So is that article just going to be you worshipping yourself? Mei 18:43, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * I just like cheetahs. (on a sidenote, I'm a cheetah therian. Don't ask. Please.) But I see no reason not to upload lots of cheetah pictures and put them there. --"CURtalk 18:46, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * I'm sure entropy will kick in at some point. You clearly don't realise how transparent you are. You could be more entertaining than Conservapedia. I'm delighted. Mei 18:55, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * I have no idea what on earth you mean. But yes, I am, to RWW at least, more entertaining than Conservapedia. Partially because I mean well, but screw up too much. --"CURtalk 19:07, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Don't be so hard on yourself. Isn't that better than not meaning well at all? Mei 19:22, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Actually I'm pretty full of myself. In an odd, self-critizing, pessimistic kind of way. --"CURtalk 19:24, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Do you want to be that way? Mei 19:50, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Rats!
Lord CUR, prior to the next raid on the horrific red links that plauge the noble land of RationalWiki, I beseech you to provide me with a longer time in whence to rile up my goat, allowing for, I hope to rid, once and for all, the horrors of Red Link from our land.
 * Sir Javascap, we ride to the special pages, then to the user list! I will meet you there! My cat is licking the cover of a book! She is weird! GO NON-SEQUITERS! --"CURtalk 19:35, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * ALAS! I runneth short upon time, I must leave these noble shores, and journey through the internet to find a piece of writing to accomadate my real life work. Farewell!
 * So you are retiring? :-( (By goat, my first emoticon. Second, actually) --"CURtalk 19:46, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Whoops.
Can someone undo that for me? I didn't know it would do that. Mei 20:01, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * No, we can't. What was the revision? --"CURtalk 20:02, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Math. Such a klutz. Mei 20:06, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Removal of edit
What was removed from this pages history? - User   20:46, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Mei accidently (I think) removed an edit. Now I can't restore it. --"CURtalk 20:58, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * "(show/hide) 20:50, 10 February 2009 (username removed) (5,103 bytes) (comment removed) [deleted] (undo)"
 * "20:57, 10 February 2009 Mei (Talk | contribs | block) changed revision visibility of User talk:ConservapediaUndergroundResistor ‎ (changed 1 revisions to 15: )"

Is all I can find. I think we might as well disable this feature, it's just being used for ebil.  ħ uman  21:55, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Remember Karajou? --"CURtalk 21:56, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Sorry to cause such a fuss. I didn't realise what it did. Mei 21:57, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Could it be limited to Burrowcrats? 22:03, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Yes, I remember, CUR, but so far the tool has only been used for stoopid - and there is no reason for it ever to have been used yet. Yeah, Toast, pop it on trent's "todo" list?  ħ uman  22:09, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * I broke two plates this morning. Mei 22:11, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * I have restored it. 11:08, 12 February 2009 (EST)

Nerd
I misread the title. Mei 22:01, 10 February 2009 (EST)

"moronic vandalism" edit summary...
Look, at the risk of getting yet another e-mail telling me to leave you alone, calling Toast, of all people, a "moron" is well and truly above and beyond the call. Don't do it again. TheoryOfPractice 18:55, 11 February 2009 (EST)
 * The vandalism was moronic. Why don't you look at it? I can do moronic things. Doesn't mean I'm a moron. --"CURtalk 18:58, 11 February 2009 (EST)
 * Leave it alone, ToP. Not worth the attention. 19:01, 11 February 2009 (EST)

"Does every new article go through this? --"CURtalk 17:45, 11 February 2009 (EST) "
Yes, many, many have, and do. The primary writers struggle to do their best job of getting their work "back on mission". Quit whining, that cat/felidae/cheetah article never really passed muster. As many before have failed and been deleted or moved to fun: or essay:. It ain't all about "you", it's about the article quality and the defense of such.  ħ uman  23:52, 11 February 2009 (EST)
 * I would like to interject at this point with...- User   22:14, 15 February 2009 (EST)
 * I have had a couple articles nuked before for being "non-mission" based. I was paricularly sad to see my awesome, kickass "Techno" page gone but hey, never mind. There probably is no god so stop worrying and enjoy your life! Ace McWickedRevolt 00:02, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * I've also had a pile of things deleted, mauled, moved to ignore essay space etc. It's called learning the hard way - RationalWiki doesn't really do mentoring much. Totnesmartin 04:43, 12 February 2009 (EST)

Zoology project
My suggestion is to expand its range into a biology project, then it can cover plants, biochemistry, ecology and evolution. This is assuming that RationalWiki is big enough to need wikiprojects. Even Conservapedia has only one, and they're bigger than us. Totnesmartin 04:48, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * Is Conservapedia really bigger than us? They only have about 2 dozen genuine editors we have at least 50 that show up a couple of times a week. - User   04:51, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * I'm assuming it is by alexa, number of articles etc rather than number of current editors. If we ever outranked CP, who we were set up to, erm, "critique" I would laugh my socks off. Totnesmartin 05:07, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * Alexa is unreliable, as we have a larger proportion of people who don't use IE, which Alexa relies on. 11:07, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * I didn't know that! So sites like ours suffer because they're used by people who aren't satisfied with what they're given and look for something better? :) Totnesmartin 11:12, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * Does anyone know of a better place than Alexa to gauge these things? Surely Google has a similar functionality set up by now?  ħ uman  16:26, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * I like Totnesmartin's idea. --"CURtalk 16:27, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * By the way, once you edit an article on zoology, I make you an 'honorary member' of the biology project. Head over there if you want to become an official member or want your name removed. --"CURtalk 16:28, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * official? Do I get a uniform? Is there an annual barbecue? What about field trips to Lake of the Ozarks? btw at WP you can join projects just by turning up... Totnesmartin 16:49, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * Yes, and you get a fancy looking logo to put on your user page. It evens comes with a free user box. And you get special access to retirement funds. --"CURtalk 16:50, 12 February 2009 (EST)

your talk page
= "community property". I'm not certain exactly what that means. Most likely: page ≠ yours. Mei 18:53, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * Talk to Javascap. He's had it exactly like this for a while. --"CURtalk 18:54, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * "Other things exist". Mei 18:55, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * More importantly. My eyes = pain. Mei 18:55, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * If this is about my /font tag above, the easy solution is for you (CUR) to paste in your preferred formatting font tag immediately after my comment.  ħ uman  15:49, 13 February 2009 (EST)

Essay:Felidae
Hi CUR,

I have added a link from RationalWiki:Article of the Weak to your essay because the article made a big deal about the low genetic variability in cheetahs. Have a read of what the idiot wrote it might give you material that could help right a mainspace article on cheetahs. - User   05:15, 13 February 2009 (EST)
 * Yes, I looked at that. I am going to look into it. By the way, I'm flattered. --"CURtalk 17:03, 13 February 2009 (EST)

Censorship
Don't censor other people in debates. That arse has been on this wiki longer than you. - User   22:09, 15 February 2009 (EST)
 * Human censored me calling Ace a dickhead. Well, he edited my comment. But I have no wish to be caught up here with that on the page. . . --"CURtalk 22:10, 15 February 2009 (EST)
 * He made the font so it was not 48pt size or what every you had it at. That arse has stopped many discussions in the past. - User   22:16, 15 February 2009 (EST)
 * May I ask how? --"CURtalk 22:17, 15 February 2009 (EST)
 * Just leave it CUR. Ace McWickedRevolt 22:18, 15 February 2009 (EST)
 * I'm leaving it. --"CURtalk 22:19, 15 February 2009 (EST)

Your favorite song
It must surely be "Good Morning Good Morning" by the Insects (from Sargent Condiment's Homely Farts Flub Wand), since it includes the most awesome cat meowling morphing into a dog barking. Geddit?  ħ uman  01:41, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Warning
If you abuse your sysop powers again in violation of your parole you will lose them. - User   20:15, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * As I said before, this, if anyone, is a sock of DSARFARG, or whoever, who appears to enjoy harrassing me. I do not see how blocking someone who is harassing me is a parole violation, especially since part of that agreement was, and I quote, 'No poking at CUR.' This is poking. RWWUR should not have been made sysop. --"CURtalk 20:17, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * DSARFARG seem to be fighting so unless he has some strange sock behaviour I doubt it. You were made sysop despite your obvious short comings, you need to learn to play nice. Does this sort of thing happen to anyone else? - User   20:20, 17 February 2009 (EST)

(EC on my own page, aargh)I saw no examples of him fighting RWWUR. And I didn't exclusively do things that were certain to harass editors, did I? And I didn't violate anybodies parol violations before sysopship, did I? I think I need to reinterate CPAdmin1's rule that this kind of poking to goad me into reacting was not allowed. --"CURtalk 20:24, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * It probably is a sock of DSFARGEG. He's a known dick and lover of tomfoolery. DSFARGEG 20:22, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * Who also attempted to annoy me with that picture he uploaded, which TOP wisely deleted. I rest my case. Since DSFARGEG is already sysop, why make RWWUR sysop? --"CURtalk 20:24, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * Everyone gets to be a sysop if they use the power in a non-destructive manner. - User   20:26, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * So when will Fred and Puma Kitten get sysop rights? --"CURtalk 20:28, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * Fred will if he stops page blanking and who the hell is Puma Kitten? - User   20:30, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * Some radical feminist vandal who made a general pain in the rear out of herself. --"CURtalk 20:32, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * It is probably just Fall down trying to prove a point. - User   20:33, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * I do not think so. Her style is very different. --"CURtalk 20:34, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * That's probably why neither of them are sysops. I was made a sysop because, deep down inside, everyone knows I'm the baddest wizard in all the lands.  My power is maximum.  DSFARGEG 20:35, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Tennessee.
It is illegal to keep a cheetah as a pet there. 
 * I'd have to agree with that sign. --"CURtalk 16:13, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Of course, they ignore the fact that you do not own a cheetah, it owns you. --"CURtalk 18:56, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Java, you need to cut back on your use of smileys. 16:15, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Why aren't you using Nx's smiley bar? 16:16, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Please stop adding so many comments here. --"CURtalk 16:17, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Me? Updating an earlier comment isn't really adding lots of comments. 16:44, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * You can add comments here, it is a talkpage. - User   19:52, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Thank goodness some one put that tag in. Генгис    16:21, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * I feel like adding this comment here. - User   23:04, 10 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Good for you!  ħ uman  23:56, 10 March 2009 (EDT)

Unwelcome template
Why did you drop that on Shatoyaah C? Because you disagree with them? Please be more tolerant and welcoming of new editors that do no harm.  ħ uman  19:43, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * I'll be honest, I should have changed it to the regular welcome template when I had the chance. A bit late now, what with all the chat about it. --Kels 19:44, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * I removed it. But anyone who's first post is homophobic trash isn't very welcome here. --"CURtalk 19:53, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Thank you for removing it. I would have, but I didn't want to "edit your edit".  ħ uman  22:13, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Rabid theism, that's why.
"Rabid," eh? Ironic, coming from someone who thinks he's a wolf-cheetah. TheoryOfPractice 19:49, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * I do not go around preaching my beliefs to people who have no wish to listen to them. If I do, I forfeit all right to NOMA and you become completely free to attack me. --"CURtalk 19:52, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * CUR we don't unwelcome people unless they are vandalising the site. Just because you disagree with what they you can't just unwelcome them. Even FD was welcome here until he started vandalising and harassing users. - User   19:54, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Which is why I removed it. --"CURtalk 19:56, 18 February 2009 (EST)

But Native Americans had similar ideas about animals.
So what? Lots of people have had stupid ideas. Doesn't make them right. TheoryOfPractice 20:11, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Remember the little modicum of respect for having it for a few thousand years? And excuse me if I am wrong, but isn't the idea that someone's behaviors can closely mimic an animal's a lot more realistic than believing in an all-powerful supernatural deity? --"CURtalk 20:13, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Hell no. The first cause argument is the strongest one they have got, your best argument is if I get a brain scan done I might have a cheetah brain. - User   20:15, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * No, my argument is that if I get a brain scan done certain neural pathways will be more similar to that of a cheetah that most humans. Please don't make straw men. --"CURtalk 20:16, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * That is hardly an improvement on my statement. How can you have similar neural pathways when your brains are fundamentally different structures? - User   20:18, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * If that was so, humans would have to be created seperately, if the brains of a human and cheetah could not be similar in any way, shape, or form. Since they were not created seperately, is it really so crazy to postulate that particular neuron pathways are more animal like than most humans? See, if we share no brain structures with animals, the whole host of instincts that we have wouldn't exist. The brains aren't really that different, aside from larger areas. Within our subconscious still lurks the mind of an animal. --"CURtalk 20:21, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Humans were made superior to animals, you are making that mistake.&mdash; Unsigned, by: Shatoyaah C / talk / contribs
 * How are we superior? Our prehensile thumbs? Animals and humans are equals, equally intelligent, equally sapient. --"CURtalk 20:23, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Haha noDSFARGEG 20:25, 18 February 2009 (EST)

We as humans have free will, which is what is allowing you to both deny God and fool yourself into thinking animals are "equal" to you (and untill you accept God, it is possible he will judge you as equal to them) &mdash; Unsigned, by: Shatoyaah C / talk / contribs
 * This contradicts your earlier statement that god loves all. And animals have free will, as well. If not more free will than humans- there are no mindless religious drones among them. --"CURtalk 20:29, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * See? Even the nutcases think you're way off base. "Within our subconscious still lurks the mind of an animal..." Yeah. an animal called homo sapiens. "Animals and humans are equals, equally intelligent" Stop it. You're making the rest of the species look bad. PEOPLE aren't even all equally intelligent, never mind different species...TheoryOfPractice 20:25, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * The nutcase thinks atheists are off base as well. And who are we to judge the intelligence of other species? How long could you last in the rainforest? --"CURtalk 20:29, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Longer than a baboon on the streets of Detroit. What a stupid question. Humans have thrived in the rainforest for millenia. TheoryOfPractice 20:30, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * And how long could you today? There are different kinds of intelligence. We are no doubt better at critical thinking and tool-making, I am not disputing that. --"CURtalk 20:31, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Which is why I would survive in the rainforest, fool, while my cat would perish in a week for its basic inability to figure out how a can opener works. TheoryOfPractice 20:41, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Until you perish of disease carried by insects, die of thirst (clean water is very hard to find), get poisoned, etc. While your cat, if outdoors, happily survives on its own. --"CURtalk 20:42, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Or gets run over by a car. And what does contracting disease (insect-borne or otherwise)have to do with intelligence? Are all the people with malaria or sleeping-sickness of lesser intelligence somehow? I have a cold right now; does that make me stupid? CUR, try not to say stupid things. It'll only help you in the long run. TheoryOfPractice 09:13, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * For whatever reason, devine or otherwise, mankind is the sole dominant species on this planet. We limited, almost by our own imagination.  Every single creature on this planet pales in comparison to our intellect.DSFARGEG 20:34, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Have a read of this CUR. - User   20:35, 18 February 2009 (EST)

I am glad to see that at least one person on this website shows signs of recognition of our superior purpose. We are Gods greatest creation, and animals and plants are tools that God has made for us to use, and are not loved by him because they cannot truely make choices. ConservapediaUndergroundResistor, do you really want to present yourself before the Lord, the TRUE God, and say that you are an animal, therefore, unworthy of His love?&mdash; Unsigned, by: Shatoyaah C / talk / contribs

You stay out of this.DSFARGEG 20:40, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Beating this person is too easy. Animals are not our tools. They are our equals (perhaps not as smart as we are, but more intellegent in other fields). My cat is more independent then you, bible thumper, because it is not restricted by a limiting religion. It can make more choices than you can. Plants. . . plants are not our tools either. Not our equals, but not our tools. And call me CUR. As for presenting myself, I do not believe in god. When ya dead, ya dead. So I don't give a . --"CURtalk 20:41, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * "Animals are not our tools" no. they are MUCH tastier than any tool. TheoryOfPractice 20:42, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Took the words right out of my mouth, which was filled with delicious cow bits.DSFARGEG 20:43, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Genesis 1:29 - 1:30 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 1:30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. This makes it clear, animals and plants exist for our usage, hence, they are insignificant. Think of it what you want to, animals were made by God to be used by us, same as plants. Go outside and pluck a blade of grass, does it resist? No, because it can't. Go to a cow and kill it, and although it may resist, in the end, it becomes the food it is intended to become. This is the beauty of what God has made for us to see. &mdash; Unsigned, by: Shatoyaah C / talk / contribs
 * HUMANS ARE ANIMALS. I don't give a dahm what Genesis says. The bible could say, 'Die, CUR, Die' and I would give a bleeps sake, because I would just throw the stupid thing into a trash bin, where anything that can turn a rational person into a mindless fundie belongs. And yes, the blade of grass does resist. It's called 'tension' which is why you exert energy picking it. But that's getting into technicalities. Cows were not 'intended' to become food. They have, but they were not 'intended' because there was no designer. What is the beauty of life if we are to destroy it? --"CURtalk 16:19, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Animals have evolved to be delicious though. DSFARGEG 16:23, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * And according to some people, so have humans. Doesn't mean we should eat them. I am merely pointing out that we should treat other life with some respect. --"CURtalk 16:25, 19 February 2009 (EST)

^That's enough out of you. Go back under your bridge. DSFARGEG 20:56, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * Or have humans evolved to find animals delicious? Генгис    16:25, 19 February 2009 (EST)

Overstepping human decency with your asinine comments
CUR, you are violating the community standards and the basic premise of this site. Please refrain from telling people to leave the site. You are contradicting the main page's invitation: "We welcome contributors, and encourage those who disagree with us to register and engage in constructive dialogue."  ħ uman  03:15, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * This comment = win. User:Mei 03:25, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * I have decided that we have a common enemy and should stop harassing each other. --"CURtalk 16:06, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * So we should harass people who disagree with you, to deflect criticism from yourself? 16:09, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * No, we should harass the common enemy, i.e. Conservapedia and conservative Christian fundies. I would do the same thing for any of you, though. --"CURtalk 16:14, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * You have used this argument before; "I'm against CP and therefore you shouldn't criticise me." Either stop making asinine comments like "all animals are equal to us" and harassing people for holding a different viewpoint to you, or accept it when we call you a jackass. 16:17, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * I have the ability to think like your enemy, but I am on your side. It is one of my most important assets. And I seem to remember an entire Wiki harassing me for my viewpoints. I think you have pretty much surrendered your complaining rights here, as this is something that you and the whole site has applied with almost every interaction with myself- but you stand up for an obvious troll. --"CURtalk 16:22, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * To be fair, if someone wants to come to this site and say their piece then that's a good thing. CP users rarely ever do, other bl/cloggers rarely do so too. They sit at a distance and mouth off where they can't be responded to. The point is that RW is there to be open to criticism, debate and whatever else. We don't win arguments by telling people to sod off. CONSERVAPEDIA IS NOT AN ENEMY! <font color=red face="Tahoma"> A rmondiko V  User_Talk:Armondikov 16:24, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * I think that's what I did, idiot. Now what happened? Fall down
 * You seem like such a nice person. I hope I learn to be like you someday. DSFARGEG 18:30, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * [[image:Coffee spray.gif]] --"CURtalk 18:38, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Not an enemy in the traditional sense of the word, but we try to counter any small influence they have. And remember my post above. --"CURtalk 16:26, 19 February 2009 (EST)

However wrong your beliefs are, you are entitled to them. I know in the depths of my soul that when such a time comes, you will recieve what is coming for your beliefs, and I will be rewarded for mine. I disagree strongly with your faith, but in the end, it pains me to know I can't do anything about them.
 * How do you know? Anyone can write a book. I can write a religious text and claim it is true. In a few millenia, who knows who will believe me? AND SIGN YOUR POSTS! --"CURtalk 16:30, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Shut the fuck up. CUR may be insane, but who gives you... oh wait...


 * They see me trollin'
 * They hatin'DSFARGEG 16:32, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Not insane, just a bit irrational. But humans are irrational, and we must learn to cope with that. --"CURtalk 16:34, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Being a bit irrational now and then - fine. Being a bit more irrational than normal and then creating a profoundly irrational explanation - not fine. 16:38, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * I am attempting to find a rational explanation- something I cannot do for a completely unstudied phenomanae. If you actually bothered studying it and found that there was no cause, I might be willing to listen. As it is, you are dismissing something that is unstudied, which is irrational. The rational thing would be to put it on the back burner and ignore it until new information comes out. --"CURtalk 16:40, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * But you have repeatedly stated that the explanation you favour is one that is very unlikely and pretty incompatible with modern evolutionary biology. 16:45, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * The only reason I trotted out the gene theory was desperation. I don't believe it, and neither does anyone else I know of. The idea that our brains could be hardwired somewhat like an animal (but not because of the genes of the animal) isn't quite as improbable, and not as incompatible with evolution. --"CURtalk 16:47, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Yes, as it is fairly probable that your brain is randomly similar to that of a cheetah, with no genetic causes. 16:49, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * No, very, very improbably, which is why it is so incredibly rare. Very few people have it. And there is a genetic cause- just not caused by 'cheetah genes'. Caused instead by abnormal human genes. --"CURtalk 16:51, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * ... DSFARGEG 16:52, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Yes, CUR, humans have all of the genes necessary to create a semi-cheetah brain. Do you even realise how improbable it would be for something that complex to happen by chance? 16:57, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Yes, I do. Which is why I am saying that it is very, very rare. When you find how improbable it is, tell me. But there is always that one little chance. . . --"CURtalk 17:19, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * What I'm sure Phantom Hoover meant to say is that what you're describing is physically impossible. DSFARGEG 17:23, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Let's let PH decide that, okay? --"CURtalk 17:24, 19 February 2009 (EST)

(deindent) CUR, you share about 36% of your DNA with a BANANA, yet I fail to see you insisting that you somehow share physical similarities to that aforementioned Banana. Furthermore, your genes are also 82% platypus, and I don't see you claiming to share a "brain" with that particular animal. My point is that we do indeed have leftover DNA, it just is not used or is repressed.
 * But the whole point is that it is theoretically possible to have the genes activate in a way that creates feline-like tendencies. --"CURtalk 17:29, 19 February 2009 (EST)

I think CUR's right, wasn't that the story to the Catwoman movie? DSFARGEG 17:31, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * I have made a simple addition to your comment, CUR. If you care to, could you furnish a study on people born with banana-like tendencies? That would be great. Goatspeed!
 * If I was presented with really, really good evidence that someone felt like a banana, I would probably disregard it, as I think we can safely draw the line at animals. No straw men. --"CURtalk 17:39, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * So you would ignore evidence that people can feel like plants, but you expect us to accept evidence that people can feel like animals?
 * Unless plants have nervous systems and personalities, yes. Otherwise I'd end up believing that people coud feel like rocks. So, no pwn. Sorry. --"CURtalk 17:45, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * "that it is theoretically possible to have the genes activate in a way that creates feline-like tendencies" By which theory? The theory of "stupid stuff that CUR pulls out of his ass at random?" CUR, stop saying moronic stuff like this with zero scientific evidence. You look like an idiot. all the more so when you crap out completely loony irrational ideas like this with zero basis in science or reality, and then try to take the high road against religious folk because their beliefs are irrational. Your beliefs about "therianthropy" and "therianotypes" are stupid and irrational. They are also, like you, tiresome. Give us all a break. TheoryOfPractice 22:21, 19 February 2009 (EST)

(Unindent): Don't rebut. It's all been said before, and you waste his and your time: 22:31, 19 February 2009 (EST)

Dat IP
I'm not sure why you blocked him. He added a lot to the Africa article.DSFARGEG 20:22, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * It appeared that he had added rascist comments. If someone else had done it, I probably would have asked them. But when an anonymous IP does it. . . I will block them for 31 seconds. --"CURtalk 20:32, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * I have fixed some of what he wrote. CUR for the 100th fucking time please discuss things with people rather than just block. - User   20:33, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * I would agree with CUR on this. I don't know about the blocking but the comments were defiantly of a "neo-african" bent, which in effect spends much of its time blaming slavery on Africa.  -- 20:36, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Precisely. Slavery may have been in part encouraged by Africa, but it was European demand for slaves that was the real driving force. --"CURtalk 20:38, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * I have refocused it to acknowledge both sides were responsible, those selling and buying slaves. I think we should try to avoid too much historical revisionism by blaming on or the other. That IP has been a bit of a problem lately. - User   20:39, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * True. But wasn't slavery in Africa very different from slavery in Europe and the U.S.? --"CURtalk 20:40, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Slavery is slavery it is fucking awful either way. The Africans kept slave and sold them like pretty much every other civilisation. It still goes on today, you should be getting pissed about that before you let history worry you. - User   20:44, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Yes, but slavery in Africa did not have the rascism that slavery in Europe had. ***** awful either way, no doubt, but the African slavery was not permeated by rascism. And yes, I am very pissed about that. --"CURtalk 20:49, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Pi, I agree we should present either humor, or "balance". And I like all the changes you kept and those you tweeked.  I was going to go to his page and suggest that he maybe bring up topics on teh Talk page, if they are that "contrary" to the norm. Then I saw a page of people writing, and decided the editor was already well in check.  -- 20:43, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * I think the IP went for a poor attempt at humour, slavery is one thing I have trouble laughing at. - User   20:44, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * Same here. --"CURtalk 20:49, 19 February 2009 (EST)
 * After reading what he said on slavery, it seemed like he was railing on both the Europeans and Africans involved. At one point, it semed like the IP was distinctly attacking Europe.DSFARGEG 09:12, 20 February 2009 (EST)

Sexy beast
How do you know he isn't? Perhaps he has a secret admirer... Totnesmartin 18:30, 20 February 2009 (EST)

importScript
Just in case you didn't notice this, I'll post it here too. You're supposed to use importScript instead of copying the whole script into your monobook.js. The advantage is that you automatically get updates and bugfixes instead of having to copy the newer versions again. -- Nx  talk 10:08, 21 February 2009 (EST)

Poke.
Just randomly sayin' hi.

Sci-fi and cats
Insert Name Here's comment about you liking only sci-fi and cats reminded me of something. Have you ever seen a Doctor Who story called Survival? It's about people turning into cheetahs. Really. Totnesmartin 18:43, 21 February 2009 (EST)
 * Though INH is actually wrong about me only liking sci-fi and cats- I just really like them. I also like exobiology, futurism, fantasy novels, encyclopedias, evolutionary theory (when presented in a form that doesn't go in one eye and out the other), and a wide range of fields. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 18:57, 21 February 2009 (EST)
 * I have come across that, actually. I think I might write an article on the 'morphic field.' Was once actually considered science, but is now pseudo. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 18:54, 21 February 2009 (EST)
 * I've got Rupert Sheldrake's A New Science of Life somewhere - a science magazine review considered it "a book for burning" when it came out. But don't wait for me to write an article on it, I'm slack as spaghetti these days. Totnesmartin 19:04, 21 February 2009 (EST)
 * You haz article. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 19:12, 21 February 2009 (EST)

A present.
TheoryOfPractice 19:16, 21 February 2009 (EST)
 * I'm not sure that I really should put that on my user page. Mainly because it could start the whole bicker over again, this time with INH. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 19:21, 21 February 2009 (EST)
 * Your user page is your castle. And besides, the image is originally titled "the Wolf-Boy." You gotta OWN that. TheoryOfPractice 19:25, 21 February 2009 (EST)
 * Oh, what the heck, I have nothing better to do. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 19:27, 21 February 2009 (EST)

long blocks...
...no need. Vandal bin and mop-up. Thx. TheoryOfPractice 18:31, 22 February 2009 (EST)

Don't revert without explanation
You've contributed nothing to the article, yet don't like it when I try to start cleaning it up. Teabag 22:07, 22 February 2009 (EST)

Barnstars? Rescue templates?
Ewww. Too much like Wikipedia. Bureaucracy and brownnosing all that. Yuk. Besides, the crustacean article isn't in any danger of being deleted, unless I get a wild hair and add a bunch of Deadliest Catch references to it... :" Secret Squirrel 22:14, 22 February 2009 (EST)
 * I see nothing wrong with having a few barnstars that peope would commonly get. Thouh I suppose you are right about the rescue template. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 22:17, 22 February 2009 (EST)
 * We should do something not barnstarish, something different for awards. Hey, I know, Magic: the Gathering cards! :) (jk) Secret Squirrel 22:24, 22 February 2009 (EST)
 * The rest of us, I think, like barnstars. I think so because I'm not the only one who made such a template. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 22:29, 22 February 2009 (EST)
 * Rescue template = epic phail. 01:16, 23 February 2009 (EST) <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"> ħ uman 
 * Why rescue templates? What's in danger? Totnesmartin 04:29, 23 February 2009 (EST)

Oh, and CUR, using "verb"ing in your sig makes a lot of poorly constructed adjective forms. You might want to improov it. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"> ħ uman  22:06, 23 February 2009 (EST)

Here.
Read. TheoryOfPractice 21:35, 23 February 2009 (EST)
 * That is a gorgeous animal. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 21:37, 23 February 2009 (EST)
 * You two are so cute when you're not fighting ;) <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"> ħ uman  22:05, 23 February 2009 (EST)

An Explanation
Dearest CUR, may I please explain something - when I say something along the lines of meat cleavers and street urchins I would just like you to be aware I am taking poetic license on the English langauge. I am a vicious prick, I have always been (perhaps thats why people think I am cop but, in actual fact, I am learning to be a politican - which is worse I wonder?) and have spend a long time writing vicious pieces of prose, some of which have been sold to reputable magazines weirdly enough, however allow me to apologise for any verbal transgressions towards you. I mean you no harm. Love Ace. Ace McWickedRevolt 02:31, 24 February 2009 (EST)
 * I really don't care what someone says to me- I care when they insult other people, but that's all. Whether I am liked here relates not to my effectiveness. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 19:01, 24 February 2009 (EST)
 * But we would miss you if you were not around.. you are like our mascot, or puppy .. or something. lol. :p <font color="#000066">Refugee <font color = "#00F0A20">talk page 11:48, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * CUR fills an urgently-needed vaccuum much in the same way that Bohdan did. Somewhere between "mascot" and "whipping boy." TheoryOfPractice 11:53, 25 February 2009 (EST)

DO OR DO NOT
THERE IS NO TRY193.1.52.12 10:12, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * THEY SHOULD HAVE GONE FOR THE DROP GOAL INSTEAD Totnesmartin 10:43, 25 February 2009 (EST)

You are the Lamest CP Vandal EVAR.
That is all. Wait, no; that is not all. Didn't your parents threaten to send you to bed without any supper if you continued with the vandalism? TheoryOfPractice 17:45, 25 February 2009 (EST)

How long have you been a sysop here?
Editing someone else's essay is not allowed, CUR, you know that. We have talk pages for that. Please play by the rules. TheoryOfPractice 20:35, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * Yes, I decided that a few paragraphs down there was a thinly veiled PA (personal attack) he sort of lost the right not to have me put comments in bold italics. Sorry. I posted my copy on the talk page. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 20:37, 25 February 2009 (EST)


 * You're making his point for him by altering his essay. Stop. 20:38, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * I did. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 20:38, 25 February 2009 (EST)

just trying something
Why did you just try it there, and why doesn't your preview button work? Totnesmartin 18:55, 26 February 2009 (EST)

* facepalm* I forgot about it. I was seeing if my changes to the delete template would work. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 18:57, 26 February 2009 (EST)
 * Best to do that in the sandbox really, rather than one of the busiest pages on the site. Totnesmartin 19:00, 26 February 2009 (EST)
 * Just a small note, the "| page" line should be the last one, otherwise the template will break on namespaces not listed. I forgot to say that on the talk page. -- Nx  talk 09:52, 27 February 2009 (EST)

Essay
I note that you broke the rules and edited my essay becasue you thought it was a "personal attack". Could you tell me which bit you assumed was referring to you?--Tolerance 15:10, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * I thought the bit about 'lowly educated adolescents' (paraprased) was a personal attack. I apoligize if it wasn't. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 16:40, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * That set you off? That was the "personal attack"? WTF? -- 16:44, 27 February 2009 (EST)

Question
What is your gender? Rationalwikiwiki inquirer 15:34, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * As CUR is a minor, I think that question is best not asked, or answered, on the internet. Please, CUR, don't answer. Totnesmartin 15:35, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * My gender identity is already known to RWW. Thank you, and goodbye. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 16:47, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * I would also like to inquire as to your age, location and whether or not you want to cyber. <font color=#CC2200>Neveruse513 15:37, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * Way to start Rww I. 15:39, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * Something tells me your idea hasn't been thought through terribly well. Totnesmartin 15:40, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * If you could please identify other RW minors so that I can avoid A/S/L/CYBER?'ing them it would be much appreciated. <font color=#CC2200>Neveruse513 15:49, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * 14/F/ALASKA/Y --Kels 17:21, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * I'm not falling for this shit again. Hi Chris Hanson! <font color=#CC2200>Neveruse513 17:26, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * I put on my robe and wizard hat.DSFARGEG 18:05, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * ^ DSFARGEG = Epic win.-Diadochus 01:23, 28 February 2009 (EST)
 * CUR is allegedly male. Still a pussy though. Fall down

I'm in your sig, -inging your verbs
Your sig spurred me to create this for you: template:Gerund. Now your -ing verbs can be spelled right. :) -- 22:17, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * Wow, you did that for coyote-boy? Thanks, his sig has been pissing me off ever since he ed. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"> ħ uman  23:45, 27 February 2009 (EST)
 * Well, his sig gave me the idea, but mostly I made it because it drives me crazy when I see "verb that ends in -e + -ing". -- 00:37, 28 February 2009 (EST)
 * Ah, ok, as long as you did it for all us gOattHerians, not just for kitTenBoi. Nice work, I expect to see it in RA's welcome comments soon! <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"> ħ uman  01:15, 28 February 2009 (EST)
 * You know, I know a goat therian (and you brought it up). Just a light-hearted remark. --"C, U Rthe,. 15:08, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * There is some German electro-pop band in my town at the moment and the lead singer thinks he is a wolf or fish of praying mantis or something. Ace McWickedRevolt 15:31, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * Odd. Could you do me a favor and see if you could dig up a bio? --"C, U Rthe,. 15:36, 1 March 2009 (EST)

Sorry dude, I cant for the life of me remember what they were called. Ace McWickedRevolt 15:43, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * Darn. Thanks, though. --"C, U Rthe,. 15:46, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * How's life at the Werelist these days?  15:50, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * Currently attempting to refute someone who is claiming about them asking for extraordinary evidence for extraordinary claims. The mods appear to be demolishing him quite well. Aside from that, really not much has happened, except that there was a conversation about goats going bad (the Tanzania story). --"C, U Rthe,. 15:54, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * So wait, the mods are ganging up on someone for asking for something perfectly reasonable (ext. evidence for ext. claims)? Them's some shitty mods you've got there, then. --Kels 15:58, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * No, the mod (one mod) is asking. . . in a nutshell, one person is complaining about the Werelist being scientific, nearly everyone else thinks he's being silly, and I really shouldn't be talking behind his back. Not honorable. --"C, U Rthe,. 16:00, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * I wouldn't blame them. Circling the wagons in a group that's built on mutual buy-in to a hypothesis that strikes the rest of the world as impossible. It does, however, suggest that Therians aren't real comfortable with criticism, which I thought we'd already learned.-Diadochus 16:02, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * Are we going to go through another HCM again? Or can we all just shut up and go critcize CP? --"C, U Rthe,. 16:03, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * A bit of light HCM would certainly liven things up a bit. Or we can just shut up.  Either way is fine with me.   16:08, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * Okay, but I expect to be able to keep this thing from taking on a life of its own. There is no mutal buy-in to a hypothesis. A grand total of two people (myself and a mod), to my knowledge, have expressed that opinion. This is a person bascially complaining about not being able to claim to be a werewolf. You'd do exactly the same thing, only more severely. --"C, U Rthe,. 16:11, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * An alleged P-shifter?  16:24, 1 March 2009 (EST)

(unident) No, but he doesn't like the fact that people will how ape**** when people hear about it, from the looks of his posts. --"C, U Rthe,. 16:27, 1 March 2009 (EST)

Look at this prestigious link...
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-thinkingchristians.htmILoveEvolution 13:23, 28 February 2009 (EST)
 * Lack of intelligence does not mean that someone will commit a crime. --"C, U Rthe,. 13:25, 28 February 2009 (EST)
 * That fact is already mentioned in the article, and your source doesn't say anything about going to jail. -- Nx  talk 13:32, 28 February 2009 (EST)

Bureaucracy
You are now a bureaucrat. Now let's see if you were telling the truth about self promotion. 17:11, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * I would, but I can't find the stupid button. --"C, U Rthe,. 17:20, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * I found it, and did it. --"C, U Rthe,. 17:27, 1 March 2009 (EST)

Are YOU Kenservative!
You seem to have similar interests!. Ace McWickedRevolt 18:05, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * Gaaaaaaaaah! I keep forgetting I can't view CP anymore!   18:07, 1 March 2009 (EST)
 * No. He probably caught my recent edit to the cheetah article under JuliaD, and decided that it was worth a shot. I call responsiblity for any craziness. --"C, U Rthe,. 18:11, 1 March 2009 (EST)

Against my better judgement
Here (may I be forgiven) 02:31, 2 March 2009 (EST)
 * I already know about them. Thanks, though. --"C, U Rthe,. 16:18, 2 March 2009 (EST)

Image:CUR.png
NO! LEAVE IT ALONE! PLEASE!

Why? It's just a partial screenshot of your user page. If we want to look at it, we could look at it, without needing the screenshot. 17:39, 2 March 2009 (EST)
 * Mainly because I like it as an example of unintelligent design. --"C, U Rthe,. 18:02, 2 March 2009 (EST)
 * You think "unintelligent" is flattering? It's certainly an interesting perspective.   20:55, 2 March 2009 (EST)
 * I'm learning to laugh at myself. --"C, U Rthe,. 20:57, 2 March 2009 (EST)
 * Speaking of which, why don't you get rid of the intelligently redesigned Template:Sysop turbolaser? Having an insult on your userpage is unintelligent design -- Nx /  talk    18:06, 2 March 2009 (EST)

Lieutenant User:Mei 20:50, 2 March 2009 (EST)
 * Thanks. --"C, U Rthe,. 20:53, 2 March 2009 (EST)

Even better. Lieutenant Mei 20:58, 2 March 2009 (EST)

Block
Do you plan to return from that block of 1.4*1032 years? 03:29, 3 March 2009 (EST)
 * that would depend on somebody not promoting him while he's blocked. Yours trulyDear Sir 04:33, 3 March 2009 (EST)
 * Well now, here's the thing: I thought CUR blocked himself due to a silly tantrum and I kind of missed him, so I decided to unblock him - but to my surprise I got a message saying that he was not blocked. So I don't think his extra-long block "took". CUR should be able to edit. :-) <font color="#000066">Refugee <font color = "#00F0A20">talk page 04:49, 3 March 2009 (EST)
 * I was bored. I blocked myself. Hi there. --"C, U Rthe,. 16:37, 3 March 2009 (EST)

WTF?!?!??!
You were never unblocked! HOW ARE YOU STILL EDITING! Wait, is there some sort of a glitch I don't know about?User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 17:27, 3 March 2009 (EST)
 * *smirks* Hi there! --"<font color="#00FF6E" face="comic sans ms">Input <font color="FF00FB" face="Monotype Corsiva" size="3"> The Resistor <font color="00AEFF" face="hurry up">Output 17:28, 3 March 2009 (EST)
 * Testing. . . --<font color="#00FF6E" face="comic sans ms">Input <font color="FF00FB" face="Monotype Corsiva" size="3"> The Resistor <font color="00AEFF" face="Curlz MT">Output 21:10, 3 March 2009 (EST)
 * According to the current block log, he's not actually blocked. -- 01:21, 4 March 2009 (EST)
 * Looks like blocks with such an extreme length don't work. Probably too big to fit in a variable, so MW just ignores them. -- Nx /  talk    01:23, 4 March 2009 (EST)
 * (EC) I was about to post just that. I tried it on myself and nothing happened. -- 01:24, 4 March 2009 (EST)
 * If he entered it as 1.4*1032 years it wouldn't work. The "number" has to be a simple integer. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"> ħ uman  22:11, 8 March 2009 (EDT)

=
Can I help you with your essay? User:Mei 18:37, 6 March 2009 (EST)
 * Yes. . . *instantly regrets the decision* But I reserve the right to revert. -- 18:38, 6 March 2009 (EST)

interval
So how was that for you? User:Mei 18:47, 6 March 2009 (EST)
 * Look, please stop removing huge amounts of content without dicussing it. That way, I can provide a rational for it being there. And the sand cat article, the entire thing, was based off the book cited. -- 18:48, 6 March 2009 (EST)
 * "removing huge amounts of content without dicussing it" = I cited reasons for most.
 * "the entire thing, was based off the book cited" = We need more than one source. User:Mei 18:52, 6 March 2009 (EST)
 * The entire sand cat section. A paragraph or two. So we only need one source. Not my fault you're too lazy to read it. And citing a reason is not discussing. It doesn't give me the oppurtunity to argue about it. -- 18:54, 6 March 2009 (EST)
 * "A paragraph or two. So we only need one source." = No that doesn't follow. "Not my fault you're too lazy to read it." = Sorry CUR? Is there something you want to say? User:Mei 18:57, 6 March 2009 (EST)
 * Yes it does. When citing a small amount of work, you only need one or two sources. I could always add wikipedia, if you want. But something written by a professer carries a lot of weight. -- 18:58, 6 March 2009 (EST)
 * Argument from authority. + professer = professor. User:Mei 18:59, 6 March 2009 (EST)
 * No, argument because a professer would no more than Joe Shmoe off the street. -- 19:00, 6 March 2009 (EST)
 * "no more than Joe Shmoe off the street" ≠ undeniably right. User:Mei 19:37, 6 March 2009 (EST)

You're no fun.
 * Does anyone else support that statement? (NOTE: made because I kept reverting his/her edits that made the Felidae article completely inane. As if it wasn't enough already) -- 19:40, 6 March 2009 (EST)
 * Mei = her. Mei likes crisps. User:Mei 19:42, 6 March 2009 (EST)

Sorry. But look at your face! Priceless. User:Mei 17:52, 8 March 2009 (EDT)

Stop. Please. I'm begging you. User:Mei 18:41, 8 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Stop. Please. I'm begging you. No more blank section titles. -- 18:43, 8 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Just had a look at recent changes.. wtf is going on? DSFARGEG 18:43, 8 March 2009 (EDT)
 * You don't want to know. -- 18:44, 8 March 2009 (EDT)

token title
"MEI DO NOT REVERT THIS!" = hilarious. Thank you very much. User:Mei 19:37, 8 March 2009 (EDT)

Wolves...
Are far behind us on the evolutionary ladder. They are our inferiors in almost every way, apart from simple pack-mentality actions. I'm not denying that they are awesome animals, but they are simply not wiser, nor are they smarter then us, and it's pretty insulting to the human race to assert otherwie as fact.DSFARGEG 17:19, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
 * There is no ladder to evolution. The wolf is adapted to its enviornment. You seem to misunderstand the basic concept of evolution. And couldn't all human social interaction be written off in such a way? This is all I am saying, I refuse to get involved in another debate. -- 17:21, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
 * No, I don't misunderstand th concept of evolution. What I am stating is that wolves have been left behind in comparison to the sheer gap in intelligence and ability to create.  We have incredibly complex languages, a wolf has only a basic form of communication at best.  Wolves howl at the moon (for territory reasons or something.  I forget.)  The human race has built ships that can TAKE US TO THE FUCKING MOON. DSFARGEG 17:26, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Love. Math. Music. Suck it. Mei 17:33, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
 * There is no evolutionary ladder, just a tree. 17:40, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Oh, ok then. I take it al back, wolves are smarter and wiser than us.DSFARGEG 17:47, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
 * That's not what I said. If you had actually read my posts, you would know that I'm on your side, but there is no "evolutionary ladder", only a tree of organisms, each with different properties but all adapted to their environments. Humans happen to be adapted to an environment requiring a complex social structure and high intellectual capacities. 17:53, 9 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Whoa man, I was messing! DSFARGEG 17:55, 9 March 2009 (EDT)

the title
"But now he's turning into SARAH PALIN! "

Sarah Palin --> Lion. Get it right mate. Mei 18:04, 9 March 2009 (EDT)

the title 2
Essay:Felidae actually looks pretty cool right now. What do you say we do with it. Mei 00:29, 10 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Please, please re-add the rusty-spotted cat and sand cat section. Both have evolutionary content. -- 09:55, 10 March 2009 (EDT)

Phail
But at least I can spell "galactic". Totnesmartin 17:44, 10 March 2009 (EDT)
 * So? EPIC PHAIL! EPIC PHAIL! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOL:OLOLOLOOLO. -- 17:45, 10 March 2009 (EDT)

Pet fishing cat
These photos are pretty far-out. (Added as a link in the felidae article, now back in mainspace). 21:19, 10 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Says jungle cat(?) Is also very very cute =^_^= Mei is useful 21:40, 10 March 2009 (EDT)
 * It was linked from the fishing cat article at WP. I think the term "jungle cat" is just being used loosely, as the jungle cat species looks completely different.  I think this Russian blog is the original & the other one is a copy of it.  The Russian version translates on Babelfish as "fish cat" or "fishing tomcat".   08:16, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
 * While kind of cool, this seems like a terrible idea. Do these people also have a chimp named Travis?  Corryundefined 08:27, 11 March 2009 (EDT)

I've found the owner's website, although I can't get a translation - doesn't seem to be Russian(?); some other Cyrillic language? Anyway, there are hundreds more photos of the cat on the pages linked from here. The best ones are probably here & here. 09:33, 11 March 2009 (EDT)

Jesus batman-urdering christ, that is one badass cat. I'd trade my four for that one. DSFARGEG 19:07, 12 March 2009 (EDT)


 * Where, oh where did your little cur go? Sorry, for the last few days I've been on vacation, and went to CHICAGO! I love the Brookfield zoo, but no cheetahs. But I did see something that pissed me off: an idiot wrote 'Terrorist' next to a picture of an Arab talking about how we need to protect the desert. -- 18:14, 13 March 2009 (EDT)
 * What's there to see in Chicago? 18:28, 13 March 2009 (EDT)
 * The Brookfield Zoo. -- 18:34, 13 March 2009 (EDT)
 * That's it? That's almost as bad as my regular trips to Ireland. 19:08, 13 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Darn, there goes my theory of CUR-absence. I thought your parents had blocked RW for being full of malcontents, ne'er-do-wells and troublemakers. Totnesmartin 18:51, 13 March 2009 (EDT)
 * You forgot jacktars and brigands. It's a rough joint. --Kels 16:48, 16 March 2009 (EDT)

May I state something.
If I may, I think your deletion of a pic you dont like (I think its funny as fuck - but whatever) is a little childish. Please get over yourself. While I wont upload it again I still think you should take a second to laugh at and with yourself. We are, after all, adults and as adults have to deal with things we may not like. My 2c of opinion. Ace McWickedRevolt 16:39, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * It is a personal attack and should be treated as such. That is not a therian, and you know it. Buzz off, and stop sticking that in places I go. -- 16:42, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * CUR, firstly I have not placed that pic anywhere, ever. Secondly I dont give a fuck about therian. You think that I care what you are or think you are? Not my business, I just thought the pic funny. No more, no less. Ace McWickedRevolt 16:44, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * But you didn't upload the picture. Jeeves did. -- 16:50, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Does that mean I can upload because I find it funny and do not wish to poke you at all? Ace McWickedRevolt 16:52, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Nope. Tainted once, tainted twice. -- 16:54, 16 March 2009 (EDT)


 * Out of curiosity, how many places did the pic appear where it wasn't a personal dig at CUR? --Kels 16:46, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * I dont know, I never saw it as such myself. There's a dig and then there's, you know, teasing. I get it from Pi all the time - he enjoys hassling my New Zealand self, but I dont freak out and demand he delete things. Again, just my opinion. Ace McWickedRevolt 16:49, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * I saw it a few times, and I personally thought it was too much. It existed for the sole purpose of harassing CUR, so far as I can tell, and I think it's massively childish to leave it in.  This is supposed to be a rational site, not a bloody 3rd grade playground. --Kels 16:52, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Yes, but certain unnamed characters don't care, as long as it means that they get to insult large groups of people. -- 16:54, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Well, yeah, I only wished to state an opinion. I dont mind so much about a picture, just get irked when bending to the will of CUR. My position is laid bare and now I can rest. Ace McWickedRevolt 16:55, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Aye there's the rub. "Deleted because CUR was insulted" = baad precedent. Mei 16:58, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * "I'm allowed to harass him because I don't like him" is worse, I'd say. --Kels 17:00, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * EC That's like internet rule 1. You can't revoke that. Mei 17:05, 16 March 2009 (EDT)

(unident) Just watch us. -- 17:07, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Well thanks for the most confusing unindent fucking ever. And you harass consevapedia all the time you hypocrite. Mei 17:12, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * No, actually. Conservapedia is a group, and I am not making broad statements like 'Conservapedians are stupid.' I say, 'Conservapedia is stupid.' -- 17:23, 16 March 2009 (EDT)
 * That's too bad. Conservapedians are stupid. Very stupid. Mei 17:28, 16 March 2009 (EDT)

For the record - I do not wish to harras CUR. I have apologised once to him for my foul mouth and have buried the hatchet in my spine. Ace McWickedRevolt 17:03, 16 March 2009 (EDT)

Tk
The fuck? Mei 20:00, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Troll. -- 20:01, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
 * But he hasn't said or done anything here at RationalWiki lately, & we don't block people for what they say or do at other sites. Some other website does that.  We don't.   20:03, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
 * What he said. You just rolled over like five different guidelines so you could look tough. Mei 20:12, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
 * They're not rules, more like, guidelines, really.

-Captain Barbossa

User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 20:24, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Yeah, don't be an idiot, cuR. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"> ħ uman  20:32, 17 March 2009 (EDT)

Janitor
You have now joined the illustrious ranks of RationalWikiWiki's janitors. 08:13, 21 March 2009 (EDT)

Bad CUR!
Stop it, or I will have to desysop you, you naughty thing! 13:14, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Being five days late for a block war that you missed is not teh phunneh.  <font color="#00F0A20">DogP  13:19, 26 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Okay, okay. -- 13:28, 26 March 2009 (EDT)

Toast
Let her have her censorship. We need now to prevent this from happening in future. 15:17, 26 March 2009 (EDT)

You bored?
Here, something useful you could do. --  Nx / talk 12:43, 29 March 2009 (EDT)

WIGO CP talk
Talk page are community property, you can not remove blocks and try and hide it using show/hide. We run an open wiki in all senses of the word including complete transparency in page history and accuracy of our archiving. If you don't want something publicly viewable don't post it. - User   19:50, 29 March 2009 (EDT)

WIGO'ing your own socks work
WIGO'ing your own edits at CP is stupid. If you're WIGO'ing your own stuff, then it's not CP. All you're doing is pointing at yourself in the mirror and laughing. It's not funny, it's not interesting, and it smacks of an absurd degree of hubris. Just don't do it. <font color="#00F0A20">DogP  16:14, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
 * For the last fracking time, I didn't WIGO it! Cracker did! Check the dahm history! -- 16:16, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
 * OK, you're right, I'm sorry - I withdraw that then.  But your crowing follow up on WIGO:T is almost the same.   <font color="#00F0A20">DogP  16:21, 30 March 2009 (EDT)

REFUTION?!!!!
It isn't even a word?!! For God's sake put everything back the way it was CUR. Clean up your own mess.

Socks Claims
Can you provide a link for where someone suggested you were TK and Conservative? That would be amusing, if it were true. <font color="#00F0A20">DogP  02:48, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
 * That is indeed amusing, but methinks you missed the point.  Ace was not really saying you were TK, he was saying you act in a similar way to TK, by disrupting things around here.   Same goes for the Conservative accusation, it was comparison, not mistaking you for a sock.   And, not that I want to pile on or anything, but you yourself were the one claiming to be Karajou, so no-one else thought that at all.   As for GFasten, you're uh, not being accused of being him either.   You really ought to try not to have such a wonderful impression of yourself -humility is a nice attribute in a person.   <font color="#00F0A20">DogP  14:41, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

Actually, DogP, I did consider that CUR might be TK due to his incredible disruption over small matters. Then I thought he cant be TK as TK isnt that childish hence leaning towards Ken. Now I just think he is a very strange character indeed. One of gods own prototypes, to weird to live, to rare to die (to quote Hunter Thompson). Ace McWickedRevolt 15:54, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Well, that's amusing then!  OK, so CUR - you can keep the TK one, but the others have to go.   <font color="#00F0A20">DogP  16:06, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Actually, the other ones are backed up by citations as well! -- 16:12, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Actually, they're not.  TK, I'll give you.   The other ones are not true.   Please don't lie, it doesn't suit you.   <font color="#00F0A20">DogP  02:45, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I know for a fact that you're not GFasten, seeing as how I know him in RL and all. That Stiltwin picture of his was pure genius. EddyP 16:56, 3 April 2009 (EDT)

Acionyx
Do you want to be renamed to that here? 03:46, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Thanks, but no thanks. -- 13:40, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

Hi
I hate you. MarcusCicero 13:46, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Constructive! 13:51, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I thought I disappeared you. MarcusCicero 13:55, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
 * May I ask why? -- 16:23, 1 April 2009 (EDT)

Steady on there
Posting a good WIGO (which that is) might ruin your reputation. 17:17, 1 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Toast- the only reason its good is because I have a sock they haven't blocked (note that the sock didn't cause the discussion, he just happened to be around). After people end up more interested in CP, they'll probably jump on it fast than I do. Right now, no one is editing the page, and I would dearly like to change that. -- 17:22, 1 April 2009 (EDT)

I left a dahm message on his talk page and he hasn't noticed.
Maybe he's having dinner, pea-brain. TheoryOfPractice 18:25, 1 April 2009 (EDT)

April fools!
.

Annoyance

 * This discussion was moved to User:ConservapediaUndergroundResistor/Random criticism