Ken Ham



Our Board believes Ken's comments to be unnecessary, ungodly, and mean-spirited statements that are divisive at best and defamatory at worst.

Ken Ham is the  problematic president and CEO of Answers in Genesis (a Christian apologetics ministry), and a Bible-ical literalist with a particular fondness for the Old Testament.

Although he hails from Australia, where all the kangaroos floated to during the Flood, he now lives permanently in the Bible Belt state of Kentucky, in his office in the Creation "Museum". Ham wants children to learn, through what may be called teaching or Indoctrination, "to think biblically" (which is for certain values of think, of course). On a mission from God, he frequently speaks at homeschooling conferences and creationist events, where one of his favorite "arguments" is "Were you there?"

Ham is also the originator of the eponymous debating technique known as the "Ham Hightail". He has a reputation for ruthlessly blocking people who disagree with him on Twitter.

Life well spent
Ham was created and raised in an obscure former prison colony where he surprisingly received a degree in applied science from Queensland Institute of Technology, followed by a diploma of education from the University of Queensland. It was in these pivotal years that Ken Ham's interest in young earth creationism morphed into an absolute obsession, mostly due to having been raised indoctrinated by his father's similarly untenable ideas and an uncritical reading of Henry Morris's magnum opus, The Genesis Flood. After having left college, he somehow became a public school science teacher, which makes one understandably worried about a few years of public-school students from Australia. He was a member of the Creation Science Foundation starting in 1979. With John Mackay, he began to sell creation science materials to Queensland public schools. He moved to the US in 1987 as a "loan" to the Institute for Creation Research. . He received an honorary doctorate from Bryan College in Science.

Answers in Genesis
In 1993, Ham left ICR to form, with the help of CSF, Creation Science Ministries, which changed its name to Answers in Genesis in 1994. In 2006, the US/UK branches of AiG decided to withdraw from the general collection of AiG international groups because of the other groups' frustration with Ham's personality, taking with them the rights to the name AiG and CSF. The Australian AiG (originally CSF, which helped start CSM), rebranded itself Creation Ministries International. In 2007, CMI sued Ham and AiG.

Amusement parks
Ken Ham is also the man behind the Creation "Museum" in Kentucky, built in 2007. In 2010, Ham announced the construction of the "Ark Encounter" amusement theme park, which includes a full-scale replica of Noah's Ark; it opened in 2016.

Debate with Bill Nye
The event went pretty much as expected; Nye presented levelheaded evidence that science works, that evolution is real, and the Universe is very old, while Ham used bad logic, cherry-picking, and blatant twisting of scientific claims. In a career high point for Ham, on February 4th, 2014, the Creation "Museum" hosted a debate between Ken Ham and Bill Nye, on the question "Is creation a viable model of origins in today's modern scientific era?" Unlike Nye, Ham didn't present evidence; instead, Ham attempted to distinguish "observational" science from "historical" science. As any observation of any event necessarily occurs after that event, this distinction is regrettably nonexistent. Ham also attempted to prove the world is 6,000 years old by saying the carbon dating method is flawed (but it's perfectly usable when dating biblical manuscripts). After spewing out more nonsense, Ham then stated that nothing would change his worldview, which makes one wonder what the point of the debate was in the first place. Further RationalWiki commentary on the event may be found here.

Second 'debate' with Bill Nye
I want everyone to understand when you go backwards and say everything happened from natural processes, that's Bill's religion. His religion is that there is no God, the Bible is not true and everything started by natural processes. He has a religion, I have a religion. His is based off blind faith, mine is not because when you start with God's word it makes sense of the world that we see and we can use observational science to confirm it

Do you see that people on the outside have, from a non-supernatural standpoint, shown that your world view could not possibly have happened?

Bill Nye visited the Ark Encounter in July 2016, thereby taking Ken Ham’s offer to tour the place. While Nye admired the architecture, he expressed genuine concern about the contents of the Ark Encounter &mdash; that is, its pseudoscience, pseudoarchaeology, and really its general failings in the department of logic and reality. Ham expressed concern that Nye was simply teaching indoctrinating children about the theory of evolution. Nye reminded Ham that the theory of evolution was the fundamental principle in all of biology.

When asked how Noah could possibly have built such a structure, Ham asserted that Noah had high powered cranes, somehow similar in quality to the cranes of today, and instead demanded that Nye tell him which tools Noah had and did not have. After a bit of back-and-forth, Ham attempted to evangelize Nye, "worried" that Nye would cause himself to suffer a second death. Nye responded by saying that he would prefer if Ham didn't indoctrinate children with such anti-science. Ham then challenged Nye by stating that Nye must have 100% of knowledge to know with 100% certainty that Ken Ham was wrong about the age of the earth being 6000 years old, gleefully disregarding the fact that in order for Ham's beliefs to be falsified, all that must be done is to present an object on the earth older than 6000 years (say, a tree), which would falsify Ham's beliefs, given that he believed the earth was created before everything on 'day one'. Ken Ham then asserted his beliefs came from evidence, the Bible, which is the word of God because in the book itself it claims over 3,000 times to be the word of God.

While two and a half years had passed since their original debate, Creationist arguments don't change that much over time. As such, the contents of their second debate was quite similar to that of their original debate, with Ham still relying on circular logic as the foundation for his beliefs.

Character description
According to esteemed biologist and blogger PZ Myers, writing "to" Ham:

Ham can't even consistently maintain peaceful relations with fellow Christians:

He has been called "willfully ignorant" by Old Earth Creationist Greg Neyman. Journalist Daniel Radosh is even more scathing in his description:

Even those who agree with him criticize him for ad hominem attacks which might be defamatory.

The Bible
All the money spent on Ark Encounter to defend the delusions of a sad man (lots of them, really), terrified that science is telling him he has no heaven to go to when he dies. Imagine living in so much fear of knowledge that you dedicate your life to moronity on this massive a scale. After all these years I still shake my head at it all. Every year Ham expounds on such thrilling topics as: reliability of the Bible, how compromise over biblical authority has undermined society and even the church, witnessing more effectively, dinosaurs, and "races". Ken Ham notes that poll statistics show that steadily fewer Americans take the Bible literally and that steadily more Americans see the Bible as a book of fables (which, to be honest, is far from inaccurate). This devastates Ken Ham (who will be left to buy his stuff?). He is unnaturally obsessed with the Book of Genesis, from the Old Testament of the Bible, to such a degree that he has devoted his life to the mental contortions necessary when taking the book to be literal truth. He considers Genesis, more than the rest of the Bible, "to be the most attacked, scoffed at, and ridiculed".

Faith
Followers of Ken Ham/Kent Hovind style creationism are setting themselves up to fail. They’ve created a starkly black and white universe in which either you are completely in agreement with their dogma, or you are completely wrong in all things, which means small cracks in their façade quickly tear wide open into vast chasms. It might mean they’re impenetrable in the short term, but over time, they crumble, and they crumble hard, since losing faith in certain pseudoscientific claims means you are inevitably going to have to question the whole of your faith. So Ken Ham is doing good work for us atheists by building a very brittle Christian wall. It can resist a few punches, but when it goes, it goes in its entirety. How about indoctrinating kids with faith? Telling kids that they have to believe the nonsense written in an ancient book — and that they’ll be tortured in hell for eternity if they don’t accept its core doctrines — is the definition of brainwashing.

Whether he holds very strong personal beliefs about the Bible or simply realized how much money he could get by exploiting popular gullibility is unknown.

Atheism
The atheist religion -& that’s what is a RELIGION - is intolerant of Christianity as they worship nature & shake their fist at God Atheism is not a religion, atheists do not worship anything nor "shake their fists at God". Contrary to Ham's belief, atheists primarily do not believe that God exists (and beyond that, there's really no particular doctrine whatsoever). Ham also insists on the existence of "militant atheists" who want to "suppress the truth in unrighteousness".

Abortion
As expected, Ken Ham is strongly anti-abortion. Ham suspects 'God is withdrawing the restraining influence of the Holy Spirit' from the United States because The USA has allowed abortion. That must be why Europe is such a hellhole compared to Africa and the Middle East.

Evolution
Most evolutionists believe evolution [']cause they were taught it, was in their textbooks — they don't want to know how fictional it really is. According to Ham, evolution is a lie and one of many that 'false teachers' will bring out in the 'last days' to discredit 'God's truth'. Ham points out rightly that evidence from fossils is inevitably incomplete, but goes on to assume that the Bible must be irrefutable. Why? Ham uses circular reasoning and claims the Bible is true because the Bible says so, specifically citing Colossians 2:3. He asserts that flood legends from all around the world are evidence for the flood legend in Genesis being true, but in an extraordinary yet expected case of special pleading, disregards the fact that the flood legend in Genesis could be yet another legend.

Ham is deeply concerned that public schools and colleges — and sometimes even Christian colleges — teach evolution as the valid scientific theory that it is, rather than focusing on conveying the much more snarky fact that it goes against the Bible.

Ken Ham appears unable to see the difference between a scientific explanation and a religion, tweeting:

Ham disapproves of public money being used to study evolution, surprise surprise.

Extraterrestrials
Real alien data will never exist because aliens aren’t real! Apparently, Ken Ham believes that aliens, if they exist, cannot have salvation (isn't God nice?) because they are not descendants of Adam, although he then uses this as a stepstone in his argument that there are no alien lifeforms.

Ham also disapproves of public money being used to research possible extraterrestrial life, surprise surprise.

Gay and transgender rights
Churches should warn LGBT youngsters they are at risk of Hell, but they should be warned lovingly.

Being transgender is, in Ken Ham's opinion, sinful. Ham strongly disagrees with Ontario, Canada, which allows people to register as "X" for driving licenses (useful for transgender and intersex individuals). Ham sees transgender acceptance as a further example of supposed moral decay in western society. It's unclear how Ham views people with genuinely ambiguous genitalia and/or ambiguous sex chromosomes.

Moral degeneracy
Ham claims modern society has become morally degenerate because Biblical standards are no longer accepted as absolute. This amounts to an appeal to the illusory good old days. The nineteenth century United States tolerated slavery in some states, tolerated American Indian Genocide, and tolerated child labor, among other problems. Traditional society in North America and Europe was more Biblical in some respects, but Ham provides no evidence to convince skeptics that traditional society was more moral.

Public schools
The 'separation of church and state' nonsense is nothing but a ruse by secularists to impose atheism on the education system & culture

Because American public schools do not actively promote Christianity, Ham insists that they impose secular humanism instead. The reality is that American state funded public schools (the equivalent of UK state schools) are required by the United States Constitution to promote no religion. Ham's view reflects a view common among American Conservative Christians that unless Christianity is being actively promoted there is an anti-Christian bias.

Science
So, in a big loud voice, who should you always trust first: God or the scientists? God, and I want you to remember that! Ham is an enthusiastic proponent of the "just a theory" escape hatch, as PZ Myers explains:

Ham believes science is flawed because scientists change their opinions over time. Ham cannot see that changing in the light of new evidence is one of the strengths of science, as it allows scientists to ratify theories which may, and specifically may, be incorrect. This practice is, of course, in strong contrast to Fundamentalism, which, despite new evidence, will stubbornly refuse to change their views, but will instead shoehorn and manipulate facts in order to fit them.

Flat Earth
Ken Ham expresses his feelings that those who maintain the earth is flat are not basing their beliefs in science. He states that those who do use the bible as the basis of their beliefs cherry pick bible verses.

Other religions
As expected, Ham is sweepingly dismissive of all other religious traditions, and seeks to 'reach Muslims' by showing them all the contradictions in the Qur'an, while failing to notice that such arguments work against his own religion (or rather, don't work, in terms of changing the minds of the faithful). Ham believes that all other religious adherents are 'lost souls mired in the wrong religions'.

Holier than thou
Over the years, Ham has pushed various fundamentalist institutions towards his version of strict Biblical literalism. This has resulted in some fundamentalist colleges requiring faculty to sign a detailed statement of faith each year and in the purging of heterodox faculty. Examples include Cedarville University, Bryan College,  and Calvin College.

Godwin's law
Ham has used the tiresome Hitler comparison in a several essays, including essays on abortion, evolution, Barack Obama, and secularism.

Publications
We need more kids’ books than ever to counter the intense secular indoctrination from public education and the secular media Ham has published a number of pseudoscientific works, the vast majority of them reflecting various mental contortions and his generally weak grasp on reality — caused by a literal reading of Genesis, combined with a fierce rejection of any data not pre-conforming to his flawed ideals.

These compositions include The New Answers Books and The Great Dinosaur Mystery Solved!, which seek to indoctrinate unsuspecting children with creationist drivel — wrapped up in science-sounding jargon — published by a host of affiliated creation "scientists".


 * The Lie: Evolution (1987). T Green Forest: Master Books. ISBN 0-89051-158-6.
 * The New Answers Books (2000). Master Books: ISBN 0890512825.