RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Property

Property | Result: No consensus after a month. It stays. For now.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete

 * 1) An unsourced article for 7 years. Also, I want to point out Bob had pointed out missionality issues back in March, at Talk:Property, but said issues have not since been pointed out. Giving these issues, I propose it be deleted. Perhaps the only other thing I could see working is essayspacing it, but even that seems like slightly overkill to me. Nonetheless, if it must be kept it should be in that format. Andrew5 (talk) 00:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Andrew5, find all redlinks to this article and redirect them. Who's going to actually click on a redirect and read this article? Who needs to know what property is? Jake Holmes ''yell at me 21:17, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * This AfD has been open for nearly a month with no advancement. What's our plan for this page? It's barely been touched in the intervening time. Jake Holmes ''yell at me 17:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Since it's been open for a month and is 2-2, it's probably 'no consensus' which defaults to a keep. it can be renominated in a few months. Andrew5 (talk) 18:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Bongolian (talk) 05:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) —cosmikdebris talk stalk 16:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Goat

 * Not necessarily objecting (the article is short and rather stubby), but there are quite a few pages that link to this one from what I can tell. -- Techpriest (talk) 11:43, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Solution: Remove the redlinks, or convert them to Wikipedia links. Andrew5 (talk) 13:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * This article has improved. And I might consider keeping if it improves a bit more.Andrew5 mobile (talk) 23:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)