Thread:User talk:Tmtoulouse/Bump: You know that obnoxious thing people do on the internet when they've said something and they feel they haven't been paid enough attention? I'm doing that./reply (5)

What I'm saying is that science is not a universal framework. There is no god hypothesis, only belief in god.

I believe RationalWiki should not characterize religion as inherently irrational because
 * 1) It's not a friendly attitude. We won't get far antagonizing people (though the question of whether obscuring the truth for the sake of diplomacy is right remains).
 * 2) Religion is not bound by such ideas as Bayesianism (is that a word? Or is only Bayesian a word?) or more specifically methodological naturalism and falsifiability.  It's the difference between faith and knowledge.

I think I understand what you're saying. I'm very sorry if I'm repeating myself. I used to think I was a good debater, but later in life I figured out I was just so stubborn the people I was debating with simply gave up...