User talk:Pink/Archive V

 '''   See here for proof... ''' Here we have... Entirely unnoticed snark - Massive list of names - My 85 signature - My Jellyfish signature - My bunchasymbols signature Randomize accusations! - Kryptonite for Radioactive Man - Some boxi in their natural habitat - My reserved signature ??? - ??? - ??? - ??? - ??? - ??? ??? - ??? - ??? - ??? - ??? Archives || Archive I || Archive II || Archive III || Archive IV || Archive V

Greetings, 85 25 151 22! Welcome to the ! -- 19:07, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Complain here
20:59, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Wazzock. 21:01, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Nice mess Chaos!, living up to your old name I see. $\approx$$\pi$ [[Image:Toxic mowse.gif|25px]]Mowse 21:02, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Fruitcakes! 21:05, 21 September 2008 (EDT)


 * Now that you're a punky pinkey female singist, are you gonna give us a tune? 21:06, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm not that Pink (bleh), and further comparisons will get you stung bitten ... er... teased .  21:08, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I rather like her, akshully. 21:30, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Teasing shall commence in 3... ^_^
 * Wait, does that mean you were comparing me to something nice? *preens* 21:34, 21 September 2008 (EDT)

Oi. 21:37, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * What? 21:40, 21 September 2008 (EDT)

That all teach you for making so many signatures. $\approx$$\pi$ Mowse 01:39, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * :P   01:40, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Don't go sticking that there out 'less you mean tah use it. -- 11:27, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * * reaches for mace morningstar * 12:12, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * -- 14:11, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Protip: If I were you, I'd go for a good, sturdy shield, too. Most types of armour are terrible against primarily blunt weapons such as maces and morning stars. -- 15:03, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Duly noted. -- 21:26, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

What happened?
What happened to Chaos! ? Bring Chaos! back! Or better, bring Chaos! back but without the exclamation mark, it makes a mess when I'm writing about Chaos! . Editor at CPSig(h)! 14:58, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Never. I am tickled pink by my new name, and shall never rename myself again.
 * Did you see how long it took to clear up my userspace and sigs when I renamed myself?? DID YOU??? 14:59, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

I did and was sorely tempted to add:

if($wgUser->getUsernam == "Pink") { break; }

to the Rename extension after it was over. tmtoulouse 15:02, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * What would that do? Prevent me from changing again? 15:04, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * In theory. tmtoulouse 15:05, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't like the sound of that.
 * And put a link in your damn signature! 15:07, 22 September 2008 (EDT)


 * Pink? What? Do you wear pink hot pants all the time?! Are you a male or a female (I never really could figure it out) 16:48, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Well I certainly don't wear pink hot pants. Or any hot pants, for that matter. Ever. You can write that down. 16:56, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * (EC)None of us could. It is one of the great mysteries the answer to which no mortal shall ever know, along with other mysteries like the true nature of the Holy Trinity and the exact number of female religious orders in the Catholic Church. -- 16:59, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Putting together Kektklik's question and AKjeldsen's mysteries... is Pink an angel? Editor at CPSig(h)! 17:13, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * An intersting idea, but frankly, I doubt it. I would expect an angel to have a better taste in music. -- 17:18, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Silence, Anders.
 * I hereby approve this idea. Would I need to speak latin or something? Do I need to be interviewed by God first? 17:27, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm afraid I don't have much experience in angelology, but I don't think there are any particular language requirements. Angels can speak any language they need to, as far as I remember. On the other hand, you'd probably have to give up your free will. Bad experiences with that, you know. Rebellion in Heaven and fallen angels and all that.


 * For further information, please see this helpful instructional video. -- 18:30, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Do angels have Youtube up (?) there? I'd hate this contest to end as too unangelic. Editor at CPSig(h)! 18:33, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It's called GodTube. 18:42, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Ok, Angels and Medievalists: next round will be on GodTube (but give me time to escape!). BTW, the WP article on GodTube compares it to... Conservapedia. Editor at CPSig(h)! 18:46, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * But... you can find porn on CP. 19:26, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm not relocating my songwar to GodTube. It's hard enough to find decent videos as it is! 18:48, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * For once, I agree completely. No Nightwish, no Within Temptation, no Power Symphony... this is clearly sub-standard. -- 18:51, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * This by two theists like you, and after all those talks on Fallen Angels, etc. Tsk tsk. Editor at CPSig(h)! 18:53, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Theism is one thing. Nightwish is something else entirely. -- 18:55, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm done. I can manage the rampant Atheism on this site, but Paganism! Or is it Animism? Anyway, over the top. I'll return to a friendly, Christian place called Conservapedia. Editor at CPSig(h)! 19:00, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Pagan or animist? Hardly, good sir! Surely, a band that wrote a song called I Wish I Had an Angel must be good Christians through and through. Why else would they wish they had an angel? -- 19:11, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Who wouldn't want a Pink/Chaos! as a pet? Editor at CPSig(h)! 19:16, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, right. That explains why my Creepy-O-meter melted. :P 19:21, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * (EC)Unfortunately, I rent - and landlords are so intolerant of pets these days. -- 19:22, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't think that's a problem for Nightwish. Editor at CPSig(h)! 19:27, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

!
''' -- 21:30, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't think you can pull that off, sweetie.
 * Anyway, Freud is dull; long live Radioactive Man. Don't you like my version better? 21:36, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * ... *grudgingly* Yah, I do like it better. Although I may need to do a complete makeover; twice now the link to Gender and Sysops was mistaken for a link to my talk page.   21:45, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Hug! [[image:Th_hug.gif]]
 * You should definitely link to your Jelly and custard essay. That was inspired.
 * Oh. Apparently it doesn't exist. The world suddenly seems... much darker :( 21:49, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It does now!  21:51, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It's not the same* :( 21:54, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * * - Not that I'm not grateful that you dropped everything to whip up a random essay for me.
 * "Sweetie"?  21:51, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Isn't that your name? I know it's something like that... 21:54, 23 September 2008 (EDT)

My sig: new and improved! 22:06, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You always go for complex over elegant.
 * You have this eerie ability to discern people's habits. Even ones we're not aware of.  And what, exactly, would "elegant" have been?   23:36, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, first of all: *preens*
 * But essentially, I think you should go with Essayist!RARandom line. It's very neat, and we can avoid the confusion of having people clicking "Essayist" by only linking a small part of the word (one letter?) to the essay itself. What do you think? At the moment it's a bit chaotic. Even for me. 23:46, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I shall take that as a compliment.  00:05, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
 * If something is too chaotic for me, it's usually not a good thing. But I suppose you crackers will have your eccentricities. :P  00:09, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Elegantized.  00:14, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Why a flamingo? 22:08, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It was a random phrase that popped into my head a couple years ago. I've been itching to use it since.   23:36, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Aww... What on Earth were you thinking at the time? 23:48, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I unfortunately do not remember. It was a couple years ago, remember.   00:05, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Natch. 00:09, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

Done already?
Slow day today? -- 12:17, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You shall not dull my triumph :P 12:28, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Ah, but if I wasn't around with my negative spin, you wouldn't have the opportunity to argue against me, thus getting an opportunity to further embellish your achievements. -- 12:48, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Not so. If you spun things positively -- especially things that might be, for the sake of argument, mind-levellingly laborious -- it would be much nicer, and would make me feel all nice.
 * Plus, when you walk down the street in your crimson frock coat, the gentlefolk would say "My word! There goes a nice fellow!"
 * Or somesuch. 13:08, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Sorry. You're right. It's important work, and I for one would never have had the attention span to do it. And I hope your life force recovers soon.
 * Not that I actually own a "crimson frock coat", mind you. I do have a grey trenchcoat, though. And a really nice hat. ^_^ -- 14:47, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * But if you don't have a crimson frock coat, what do you wear whilst japing? 14:51, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Contrary to the common opinion, it is in fact perfectly possible to jape whilst wearing clothes other than crimson frock coats. In my case, I usually wear much the same as what I do when not japing, i.e. a discreetly casual shirt and trousers. And a trenchcoat and hat if it's outdoors. -- 14:56, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I shall ignore your blatant ignorance of the finer points of japing. And your trenchcoat and hat remark makes me imagine some kind of pirate. What kind of hat are we talking about here? How many types of ornamental fruit? Roughly? 15:03, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Black trilby, precisely zero pieces of ornamental fruit. The idea is that you should imagine a dashing and mysterious figure like Sam Spade or Philip Marlowe, not a pirate. Who ever heard of a pirate in a trenchcoat, anyway? -- 15:06, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Dashing? Where are you dashing? Somewhere mysterious, no doubt? 15:19, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, dear. Your relentless punning dash my feeble attempts at witticism. :-( -- 15:25, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Doesn't Yahtzee have a trilby? Are you a detective? What colour is groove? Can I have another muffin? 15:27, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, Yahtzee has a trilby, and this fact significantly contributed to my decision to also acquire one. I am indeed a detective, in the sense that researching history is much the same as investigating crimes, except with less risk of being shot at (Usually). Groove is apparently predominantly white, plus some colours I have no idea what are or even knew existed. I'd be happy to send you a muffin, but I think it'd be quite stale by the time it got to... wherever it is you are. Also, I think you're channelling Millicent again. -- 15:33, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yours looks better than his. Although, admittedly, I only know yours from my imagination, in which I have defiantly characterised you as a most buckle-swashing pirate.
 * In other news, some Millie strips are almost absurd in their resemblence of Me. 15:42, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Update: I never cease to be amazed. It's almost like a window into my mind ^_^ 15:48, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Very interesting. :-) I don't know if I can quite live up to this new constructed image of Me as a pirate. Although I did take a few fencing lessons once. Until I found out I sucked at it and quit. -- 15:53, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You need:
 * Long, tangled beard
 * Crimson frock coat (wif gold bits)
 * Ship (Don't forget this part)
 * Cool pirate name ("Arrr! I be... Kjeldsen!" ... "Get off my ship.")
 * Plunder
 * To drink some grog.
 * I think that's about it. What are you waiting for? 16:02, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I can handle the beard, given a bit of time, a coat, a name, and grog. But the other two could be a problem. And what about wenches? All the other pirates would laugh if there aren't any wenches. -- 16:42, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * With plunder, comes wenches. How can you aspire to Piracy if you don't understand basic pirate logic like that?? I can always lend you the Jellygalleon if you've not got a ship -- but I'm far more interested to hear about your pirate name!  16:45, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * So be it. I shall be Capitaine André, le Loup de la Mer. And may le Diable take those who cross my bow. Avast! -- 17:17, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You can't be captain. I'm captain. You're my first mate. 17:18, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * This was not in the contract. -- 17:21, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It was in the puntastic "Mating" section. Possibly my favourite section ^_^
 * Would you rather be something else? I'm sure we could both be captains if you insist -- although we'd have to share all privileges and authority, of course [[image:nods.gif]] 17:24, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Nono. That would be confusing to the crew, the poor little things. I think it's a well-established pirate rule that in the end, the pirate with the coolest name gets to be captain. So if you can come up with a cooler name than mine, you get to be captain. -- 17:26, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I shall be Captain Pink, of course. I'm surprised you ask. 17:36, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * "Captain Pink"? What sort of a name is that? Do you think the Royal Navy will shake in their leaky boots when they hear that "Captain Pink" has set sail? -- 17:39, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes. The incongruity between my name and my bloodthirsty legacy will give my persona the illusion of mystery. Basic psychology, AK. 17:42, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Okay, you can be captain, but only because it occurred to me that I hate being a leader. But for the record, I still think it's a silly name for a pirate. You could at least think of a byname as well. -- 17:51, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * "Pinkie"? *tugs your coat* What's a byname? 17:53, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It's an extra name you use to inspire even more fear and trepidation in your enemies. "Capt'n Pink the something-or-other." I think it's called a byname, anyway. Nickname? Nom de guerre? -- 18:17, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Can I be the parrot on your shoulder?  17:22, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You aim far to low, RA. 17:24, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Perhaps. Got any references? -- 17:27, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes. My cat can testify that I taste most like a bird.   17:30, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * In other words, you haz a flavor. Ye're hired. -- 17:39, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, but that's because piracy could only ever be a part-time gig for me. I enjoy being an office slave for a living.   17:30, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * That's unnatural. Ye're fired. -- 17:39, 25 September 2008 (EDT)

I know your plan
You're now Pink...and you're a little white mouse mowse.....waitasecond! Does the phrase "world domination" mean anything to you?! And what did you do with the letter Y?!?!?! -- 12:13, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Y do you ask? :P 12:22, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Y not? --ossarian Speak, Memory 12:33, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I resent your accusation. I am certainly not a labrat. 12:37, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Then explain this. We all know the first step to conquering the world is mastering the Wikis. -- 12:42, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Make light of my megalomania, would you?? 12:49, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Nothing could be further from the truth. I'm just sayin', I would be GREAT for a cabinet position in your New World Order. -- 12:51, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I shall certainly remember that in the future ^_^ And what position do you see yourself filling, Mr Yossarian? 12:53, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * : D Well, *I* always thought of myself as just *perfect* for Minister of Propaganda, Pedantry, and Punctuation...there WILL be a place for punctuation in the nouveau régime, yes? -- 13:01, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * A most pedantic one, I expect :) But I am puzzled as to how you hope to combine this with propaganda? 13:03, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, well, you see, our, that is, your, government would have a monopoly on all punctuation use. And THAT WAY, we, that is, you, would be in firm control over all subversive clauses and anarchistic grammar(s). Also, we could increase efficiency by 20% with the introduction of the interrobang into common usage! -- 13:10, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm afraid I could never allow my stewardship to be sillied sullied by such heresy. Plus, your plan to hoard punctuation is, unfortunately, quite impractical. Please pack all your novelty life-sized interrobangs (yes, we've all seen them, Mr Yossarian; they stick out of your bag) and begone from my evil lair!
 * You may redeem yourself by making me waffles. 13:16, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 *  What do you like on them? -- 13:18, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Syrup, cream and bacon. (Seriously, but not more than once a year...)
 * Only, you shouldn't really stir the batter; you're supposed to fold it, so you don't squash the air out of it and it stays light... 13:24, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * If I get this down, can I be Minister of Waffles ‽ ? I'll even get rid of my interrobangs. Even the one I put on my design submission for your evil flag. -- 13:30, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You told me that was a stylized scythe clearing out the waste of the previous world order
 * And yes, you can by Minister of Waffles. The post is... um... vacant. 13:33, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Score! Oh, no, see, that IS what that is. The interrobang is the thing I told you was a stain right beside my proposed slogan: "You think we're joking‽" -- 13:38, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * This is beginning to sound like a scary New World Order [[image:Th_unsure.gif]] Are you sure our slogan isn't "You didn't see nuffin, right?" 13:44, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 *  That's exactly what it is. -- 13:46, 27 September 2008 (EDT)

Oz&Mi
Regarding this, I'm afraid I can neither confirm nor deny that I may have spent most of today reading through the archives. -- 16:46, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I did that a few days ago, when I discovered them ^_^ That's why I kept finding good ones of Llewellyn channeling you. And Millie, obviously :) 17:37, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Perhaps we should demand royalties for the use of our respective personalities? -- 17:55, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Definitely. Summon up all of your dragon brethren, and let us descend on this offending webcomick! 18:03, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It'll be over soon anyway, sadly. --Kels 18:04, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Defeatist! :P
 * But at least there are going to be some nice conclusions to storylines and etcetera. A wedding, most likely... 18:07, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Ending a story in a dignified way is a good thing. More cartoonists should know how to do that. Especially those that stopped having something interesting to say about half a century ago. -- 18:17, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You really don't like Garfield, do you? ^_^ 18:19, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * All I'm saying is, when a comic is improved significantly by removing the main character entirely, something went wrong somewhere. Still, it could be worse. It could be Family Circus. Or Drabble. *shudder* -- 18:26, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Garfield Minus Garfield is depressing. Anyway, I have never heard tell of these other comicks you mention. Be they as awful as you imply, Daneman? 18:35, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * G-G is not depressive, Captain Pink, it is existential. It explores the deep existential angst that is the inevitable companion of the blandly suburban way of life in a post-modern world. Incidentally, comics like Family Circus and Drabble are much the same, only unintentionally. Family Circus, for instance, has run continuously since 1960 with the same uninteresting characters, living in the same uninteresting suburban environment, doing and saying more or less the same uninteresting things. It's like a horrible, horrible nightmare version of Groundhog Day. -- 18:47, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Right, and in it's marvellous existentialism, it finds a deep deep well of depressiveness. I still don't see how Camily Fircus and... that other thing you mentioned... could be so popular without having drawn my attention. Where are they printed? Newspapers? Underneath milk cartons? 18:57, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Mostly American newspapers, I believe. Of course, in this modern day and age, they have websites. http://www.familycircus.com/ and http://www.comics.com/comics/drabble/. Access these at your own risk. -- 19:14, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Writing a Popular & GenericTM comic strip looks intriguingly easy, Mr AK Jeldsen. 19:24, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes. Yes, it does, Mr/Mrs/Ms/Dr/etc. Pink. If there were someone available to actually draw the stuff, it would more or less write itself. By which I mean you could probably lift everything you need from other comics without anyone noticing. -- 19:31, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

Signature stuff
This is the sig that Pink build. 10:57, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Which is why I'm practising by talking to myself 10:58, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I can't help thinking that most people won't notice the difference... 11:00, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Do turtles wear slippers? 11:05, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Turtles ARE slippers. For themselves. :) -- 15:03, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * * reaches for the template...*  15:05, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * (EC)I'm really tempted to steal this "add-yer-own-comment-at-will" sig innovation, 'cause that's really cool. -- 15:08, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Perhaps you meant The Turtles? -- 15:08, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I must warn you, the customisable talk link thing really put my mind through the wringer. At the moment, I think I'm a duck. 15:10, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Ducks are my favourite animal...you look like a mowse, though. Believe me, I know my ducks, AND my mowses ( People Purple George agrees). -- 15:15, 29 September 2008 (EDT) I found a duck joke, but it was rather mean spirited
 * Really? What is this mean-spirited duck joek? 15:17, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * ''A woman comes home on Valentine's Day with a duck under her arm. Her husband meets her at the door. She says, "This is the pig I'm fucking."
 * "That's not a pig, it's a duck," he replies.
 * "I was talking to the duck."
 * Mostly I find it mean spirited because whenever I banter with you I'm overwhelmed by a sense of good natured fun. -- 15:20, 29 September 2008 (EDT) Also, it's a really old joke. Also, your mowse is deceptively cute, and it supplies you with copious amounts of innocence...whether it be warranted or not...
 * I do like my mowsie. It's a nice mowse.
 * You're right, that is slightly mean-spirited. My feathers are well and truly ruffled. 15:28, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Would you say you're transbestial? -- 15:31, 29 September 2008 (EDT) best neologism I could come up with on short notice
 * What cheek! 15:34, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Bu-- ch-- you-- you wouldn't really do THAT...would you? She's a very stereotypical Jewish mother, and I would not hear the end of being cheeky to fine upstanding duck-mowses. -- 15:39, 29 September 2008 (EDT) She makes really good challah though...you wouldn't want me to go without tasty Jewish bread!
 * I'm glad you changed it from duck-miwce -- that looks too much like "duck mince" for my comfort [[image:th_unsure.gif]] 15:59, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Certainly not. I am against the eating of all duckies, mowse or otherwise. -- 16:05, 29 September 2008 (EDT) The voices in your head are calling, stop wasting your time, there's nothing coming
 * Eating mowses is fine in the right context. 16:35, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Really? What do they go best with? -- 21:23, 29 September 2008 (EDT) I couldn't resist the Clash song, as that lyric so beautifully tied in with yours. :D And apologies for the lateness of my reply. I was called away to the hallowed halls of post-secondary education.
 * A subtle red wine sauce, I'd think. -- 05:37, 30 September 2008 (EDT)

Code
Code isn't meant to be intuitive, silly. ^_^ If it was, anybody could do it, not just the coders. -- 09:42, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Do you know how dangerous it is to hang around someone working on an extremely laborious series of chores? You will in a second...
 * Hello person with spare time on their hands! How would you like to help me work on a way of  the edit part of my PinkDiff template?? 09:50, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I have no idea what you're talking about, but sure, I can do that. Actually, I have considerable experience with doing extremely laborious series of chores. -- 10:42, 30 September 2008 (EDT) <- Sadly enough.
 * Did you try using &lt; and &gt; for the brackets around "nowiki" in the template yet?  ħ uman  16:23, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * No. Let's give it a shot! 16:26, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * No, it didn't work. 16:33, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Hmmm, yeah, because they render instantly into the, dang. What about the number code for them?  I know we did this before somehow, I wonder if SusanG remembers?
 * &#60; &#62; are the number codes. Probably same problem, though.   ħ uman  18:37, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * What you need to do is whine at Trent until such time as he installs this extension. (Also remember next time, the magic search string for such issues is "escape sequence") --JeevesMkII 18:41, 30 September 2008 (EDT)

The Unofficial Most-Original-Rename-of-a-Vandal Contest
Ha! I have finally equalled, nay, surpassed you in our unofficial most-original-rename-of-a-vandal contest. Acknowledge your peer, and ! 15:36, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * No you haven't, silly. Haven't you read mine? Clearly you have not. I maintain that I am in the lead, and now that you have formally acknowledged the contest, I shall increase the quality of my names accordingly [[image:nods.gif]]  15:40, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You seem to be confusing "really long" with "quality". I suggest you try some names less than three-score characters long.   15:44, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Why? I was doing it to make life difficult for our permenant vandals (plus I like long ones). Plus, it's pointless renaming them if you don't register their original name -- they just sign up again. 15:46, 30 September 2008 (EDT)

PINK
Pink it was love at first sight/Pink when I turn out the light/Pink it's like Red, but not quite, and i think everything is going to be alright no matter where we are tonite. :D you've got me bopping to Aerosmith. -- 16:40, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I know not of these Aerial Smiths who mention me. Feel free to bop to your heart's content, though. 16:49, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Pink it´s my new obsession/Pink it´s not even a question/Pink on the lips of your lover, ´cause/Pink is the love you discover. -- 16:54, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You've been waiting to spring this on me for your entire life, haven't you? 16:57, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes I have. My life has now reached the point of sublime perfection. -- 17:00, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Bah! You realise that means you'll vapourised, right? :P 17:02, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I will? Will it hurt? -- 17:05, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Not if you are Pink. Pink, like the bing on your cherry, pink be cause you are so very...  See, how could that hurt?-- 17:07, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You're right, it couldn't. "Pink it was love at first sight, yea/Pink when I turn out the light, and/Pink gets me high as a kite/And I think everything is going to be all right." ... Except I'm not really Pink, so it might hurt me anyway. Oh, well. -- 17:12, 30 September 2008 (EDT)

by the by
How do you keep your head sane with all those personalities? -- 20:55, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Sane...? 20:56, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * ah. i think i begin to see a fallacy in my hypothesis.-- 00:42, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * ^_^ 01:09, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Smile? -- 16:12, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * By teh way, again, I was welcomed to this page by a line saying you were my sock. And i hate to say this, but if that's the case, you'll want to take a bath tonite.  My socks are pretty smelly after a long day's work!  -- 16:16, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * The thing at the top of a page is a mechanism that Susan wrote -- it says that to everyone. If you click the "proof" link underneath it it might make slightly more sense.
 * And, if you'll excuse me, I have to go and bug AKjeldsen about Twin Peaks now ^_^ 16:24, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * LOL, yes, i knew it was a widget. I was just giving you a hard time, cause...well, I don't really know why, but it's better than banging my head against my desk, I guess.  -- 16:29, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

Enquiry
Okay. What do I have to do to convince you to change the colour of those little messages in your sig? Right now, the only way I can read them is by highlighting them, which is sort of inconvenient, but I do it anyway because they might say something interesting. I hope we can reach some sort of negotiated solution on this issue. -- 17:10, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * In fact, I was about to slightly alter my sig, and I think you'll find the new colour scheme quite straightforward to read. I am touched that you would attempt to read such silly messages in their current colour, though ^_^ 17:14, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Actually, you can help. Can you find me a picture of some holly? (On a white background, of course) 17:18, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, don't worry. I'll do it myself *sulk* 17:26, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Patience, now. ;-) There are a couple at http://karenswhimsy.com/holly-leaves.shtm, and they're even in the PD. (I really don't recommend doing a Google image search for "Holly", BTW.) -- 17:28, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Too late. And I'm blaming you for the results :P 17:30, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Always happy to accept blame. I consider it a civic duty. Giving back to the community etc. But anyway - isn't it a bit early for Christmas decorations? -- 17:42, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * No! No it isn't!
 * Anyway, I think I found a nice one in that site you directed me to. I've had to tidy it up a bit -- taking only a little bit from the big image. I hope this works... 17:45, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, happy "Still 82 Days to Christmas" Day, then. Here's a little something to go with it. -- 18:12, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * It's Christmas right now as far as I'm concerned. And thank you for that video -- music was sweet; singer was weird. 18:25, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Pink... just as in Real Life, Christmas doesn't come any sooner just because you start hanging up decorations and stuff. -- 18:46, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Eh? Christmas is decorations, my dear Andreas. 19:08, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * But what about the message? The symbolism? The anticipation? The loot gifts? The magic? :-( -- 19:20, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed, those are the most important parts, and I concede that they are far more important than decorations, but they are each closely tied with the decorations. Hanging them up sooner, does extend the period of magicness. Besides, it's freezing here, so it feels like Christmas to me :P 19:27, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Hmm. I would have thought putting decorations up earlier would only water down the magic as they gradually enter the realm of the horribly quotidian, rather than announcing a brief but special time of the year? -- 19:40, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * You're forgetting the First Law of Chocolate -- more is always better.
 * And re:Ozy&Millie, yes I think there was. I can't remember what it was, though -- that strip needs a search engine! 19:59, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I must admit I question this "First Law of Chocolate". Not least because there is such a thing as theobromine poisoning. Christmas is much the same. Except that instead of dying horribly from unmetabolizable chemicals, you want to kill yourself as the initial feeling of Christmas cheer gradually turns into the unavoidable ennui of the Everyday. But otherwise it's much the same. -- 06:43, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Um... Theobromine poisoning? 12:10, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Nonetheless, I stand by my silly law! 12:10, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes. Theobromine is an alkaloid present in chocolate. If you eat more of it than the body can metabolize, it flows around in your blood stream and basically acts as a nerve poison, causing all sorts of unpleasant conditions. Humans can handle pretty high amounts, but certain animals can't - dogs, for instance. So never give chocolate to your dogs or cats. -- 12:31, 4 October 2008 (EDT)

This just to inform you that I was going to send you a Very Important Email, but couldn't
This just to inform you that I was going to send you a Very Important Email, but couldn't because you don't have email activated. So now you won't get one of my incredibly rare and highly sought-after Very Important Emails this time around. Actions have consequences. Or in this case, 'no actions', I guess. -- 17:17, 4 October 2008 (EDT) <- But shouldn't the logical inversion of that axiom mean that no action, or by extension inaction, has no'' consequences? Hmm.''
 * Very strange. I'd had my email enabled for ages, but whenever someone tries to send something to me, it won't work.
 * I'll do you first then, shall I? 17:26, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Got your mail, but yours still claims you haven't "specified a valid e-mail address, or has chosen not to receive e-mail from other users." Did you check that box at the bottom of Preferences/User Profile that enables email? -- 17:52, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Yeah, that was it.
 * Fixed. 17:59, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Or do you mean I should message you here? In any case, I sent it now.-- 18:07, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I got an email from you once, but it didn't feel particularly rare, and it wasn't highly sought after. Pink's emails, on the other hand, are a veritable fountain of profundity, on par with her taste in music.  ; )   20:52, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Which doesn't prevent you from ignoring them, I notice :P 21:31, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * RA, if you only got one, you must least admit that it was a pretty rare one. -- 06:11, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I wouldn't say it was rare, more like well-done. : )   17:02, 5 October 2008 (EDT)

Regarding your Very Important Email, I have just now sent you one
Regarding your Very Important Email, I have just now sent you one because I didn't really want to be called mean again. Also regarding this Very Important Email, I believe you will find the theories contained therein quite convincing and unassailable. -- 20:10, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Fangs! 20:17, 4 October 2008 (EDT)

CPink
Any relation at all? 22:48, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, that's me. Just staking my claim to the name, really. I wouldn't mind staying to make the occasional comment/minoredit, though. 22:54, 4 October 2008 (EDT)

For your information
I note that you have declared yourself the Official RW Sockspotter. To make the chase interesting, I can inform you that I currently semi-maintain two sockpuppets on RW. Best of luck. -- 10:50, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * If you're going to retain my services, even as a joke, then I want a team of lesser detectives, a hotel room to use as a base, and two weeks of time to provide the evidence. For I am  P !  15:18, 6 October 2008 (EDT)

So that's why
I'm always like this: -.-

You are stealing mai faces!! 22:45, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, I've been stealing your faces for ages ^_^
 * They're very cute. 22:47, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Wai you delete my "footprints in snow" bit in your Editpusher? 22:47, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Isn't that a Grateful Dead album?  ħ uman  00:22, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

ASCII
Numbers lower than 32 (25) are what's known as control codes and are inherited from the old days back when I was a mere 20+ year-old. 13:08, 14 October 2008 (EDT)
 * That format gibberish is ASCII? You mean I could have looked it up instead of trying to make a massive list of every combination???? 13:36, 14 October 2008 (EDT)
 *  what do they teach kids nowadays? 13:40, 14 October 2008 (EDT)
 * At what point in history did they teach ASCII in schools? 13:49, 14 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Raises hand - some point between 1985 and 1987, cause that's where I learned it. and i WOULD sware it was in typing class-- 22:18, 15 October 2008 (EDT)  ;)
 * Really? Hmmmm. I concede defeat... 22:22, 15 October 2008 (EDT)

"Wazzock"
apparently there is no such template.PFoster 18:37, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
 * A great hole has appeared in my world, and it may never be healed...
 * : ( 18:38, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I have a hole in me pocket! (want it?)-- 22:17, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Is it detachable? :) 22:18, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Ok, you know you are old when people do nto get yELLOW sUBMARINE references. ;-)-- 22:21, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
 * What's a yellow submarine got to do with it? 22:23, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Bumpa bumpa... we all live in one...  ħ uman  22:41, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Yellow submarien, splosions, Blue Meanies! -- 23:21, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Excellent movie, by accident.  ħ uman  23:43, 15 October 2008 (EDT)