User talk:Smg87

Hi. Nice of you to join us. If you'd like to know a bit more about the site please have a look at our RationalWiki:Newcomers' guide.--Bobbing up 14:09, 12 March 2009 (EDT)

Greetings, Smg87, and welcome to the   ! Thank you for joining us! I hope you enjoy your time here. 15:07, 12 March 2009 (EDT)


 * Hey I've only just noticed that your 'welcome to the' changes each time, silly me. Haven't really done much of anything here, but hopefully that'll change soon. Please shout at me if I do something wrong.


 * Like forget to sign my own name. Whoops. --Smg87 02:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

sysopship
as per prtocol, welcome to your new powers. Please use them agressively and arrogantly. Ace McWickedi9 22:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Testing to see if creative new signature change works... --User:Smg87talk to me 22:43, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * And again... --Seantalk 22:44, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Please ignore the troll
ignore him, he's a self-admitted troll. He goes around trying to get a rise out of people by insulting them, and pretends that he's an intellectual. Totnesmartin (talk) 13:09, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, I'll ignore him. I just don't understand why he does it. On a completely different subject, the only topics I feel confident enough to write articles on are biology and music, but I can't always see how they would fit with the site's mission statements, and I can't tell jokes. Should I stick to red-linked articles? --Seantalk 13:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You could check RationalWiki:To_do_list. I'd be cautious about going to heavily in to biology though, since RW isn't intended to be an encyclopedia. It's pretty helpful to cover topics that are commonly misunderstood or abused. Embyronic stem cell research is a classic example of this. Getting red links out of the way is useful, but only if the resulting article is on-mission. In some cases, we may be better off just de-linking those things, or pointing them towards WP for a more encyclopedic description. -- 13:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you --Seantalk 13:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No worries. Happy new year! -- 13:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't listen to Totnesmartin. He's just jealous that he doesn't have my considerable powers of intellect, wisdom, reason, or virtues such as honesty, clarity, objective goodness etc. They insist on keeping me in prison because if I was unleashed I would continue to point out the flaws in this website. I like to talk about the opportunity cost of RW being turned into a fascist hellhole which loves memes and shit internet jokes. Think of all the good people the site turns away every day by adopting this moronic attitude? MarcusCicero (talk) 13:53, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Pretending to be your mentally ill brother counts as "honesty" does it? Intellect? Claiming to have written a play based members of this site, but not saying what it's called or who was in it - of course there's no lay, you're just being pompous. objective goodness? calling people child abusers because you disagree with them. fascist hellhole? Vandal-binning you for being a troll is different from killing millions. You are a troll, you've admitted it yourself. This is your life - insulting people on the internet because their website isn't as good as you'd like. Totnesmartin (talk) 14:03, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Your propaganda changes nothing Totnesmartin. This decrepit site, devoid of reason, simply cannot handle my powers of observation. I am a collosus bestriding the English language. Have you no shame? Can you not see the damage you are bringing to mankind at large for keeping my talents away from this site? Just imagine the changes I could bring here, if I was a 'crat' for a day. RW needs a reformation. RW needs a Luther. Let me light the spark that will change the mindset of a generation. MarcusCicero (talk) 15:19, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't mean to be picky but your claim of mastery over the English language would have greater substance if your spelling was better. 15:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * a collosus bestriding the English language ha ha! Incidentally your rhetoric about wanting to improve RW would carry some weight if you'd made any mainspace contribs in the last six months. Totnesmartin (talk) 16:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Good spelling and hard work are the last refuges of the unimaginative MarcusCicero (talk) 16:39, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Using a thesaurus to make oneself look smart is the first refuge of the stupid cunt. 16:52, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * @MC - I agree. Without reservation I agree. 17:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Idiots. I am infinitely more intelligent than the continental USA combined. How dare you speak to me thus? Down on your knee's dog! Apologise. Respect my authoritae. MarcusCicero (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Don't feed the troll
I just wanted to add a new line so that I don't see the troll's name coming up on recent changes. Perhaps we could continue below this point.--BobBring back the hat! 15:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, now I think about it some more - could we perhaps not continue beyond this point?--BobBring back the hat! 15:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Blimey. Anyway, yep thank you for the advice, have got a couple of ideas for appropriate articles, if I get the time in my busy schedule of dodging revision and general procrastination. --Seantalk 00:35, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

happy
--  = w =  06:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Don't go!
Don't go away, Don't let this end, pleeeeeease stay. (Not just for a day) quoting Edge of the Deep Green Sea by The Cure. Acei9 03:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Did we do something wrong? If it is, kindly let us know what it was.   03:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Not that I've ever directly spoken to you but that seems like an odd, sudden move. Your decision, of course, it's not like you're permanently losing something, I just hate to see editors put the template up. 03:50, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * [MEI has joined the DON'T LEAVE group] --  = w =  03:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, stay dude! Acei9 03:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * [[image:33.gif]] 03:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Nothing wrong. I like the site, visit everyday, but I'm hardly a contributer and find it's easier listening to discussions rather than getting involved in them. Less chance of looking like an ass. Thanks though! &mdash; Unsigned, by: 149.254.218.69 / talk / contribs 04:01, 10 January 2010
 * That's all well and good but keep your account open at least! Then you can comment when you get outraged! Acei9 04:03, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I look like an ass all the time, and it doesn't stop me! It is part of who I am, I guess.   04:05, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I am total fucking ass all the fucking time! Acei9 04:06, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't say "ass", it's something different. More than an ass, but at the same time, less than an ass. 04:07, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * errrrrr, thanks I guess. Acei9 04:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Bugger
I thought it was a different poll, but you're right - it's a dupe. Thanks for spotting. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 01:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries. --Seantalk 01:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Apology
I apologize for my unblock comment. I was a bit cranky today, and this guy is really annoying me. Still, that's no excuse, and you did the right thing™ -- Nx  / talk 22:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. My mistake. --Seantalk 05:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

what do you mean?
you said to me "Nowhere's perfect. And you seem to have your head screwed on right." what did you mean by that ?Waronstupidity (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)