User:Jazzman831/annerice

Anne Rice debacle:
 * 15:34: Ed deletes the article, stating "Inappropriate content: porno author" (there was no reference to her porn works at the time).
 * 15:25: Ed explains that he deleted the article because it was vague about when she wrote porn. (Note that this is not the first time Ed has completely deleted an article instead of fixing it or blanking it, forcing users to entirely rewrite the article, from scrath, with no references.)
 * 15:50: Alan points out that it's kind of hard to fix the article if you've just deleted it.
 * 16:12: Ed restores the article.
 * 16:24: Ed removes most of the article, saying that he dislikes her, and claims the article is puffing her up.
 * 16:39: Alan writes a large explanation, and asks for Ed to explain his deletions.
 * 16:42: Alan readds the section, saying that everything is "sourced, factual and relevant".
 * 16:47: Ed reverts Alan, re-messing up the intro section, removing the important things like the date she was born, and why she was famous. He tells Alan to "please join the discussion".
 * 16:49: Alan says that he was discussing, and asks Ed (for the second time) to explain his actions.
 * 16:50: Ed blocks Alan, claiming "I asked for discussion, not whining"
 * 18:05: Ed removes Alan's comments. (Note that nobody ever added these back, so unless you look in the history, it will look like Alan really didn't discuss the changes. Note also that this is not the first time Ed has removed factual and relevant talk posts in order to hide examples of people pointing out his faults.)
 * 20:37: HenryS (aka teh Bohdanza) asks Ed to reconsider the block.
 * 20:44: TK is an ass. Nothing new there.
 * 20:52: Ed unblocks Alan.
 * 21:11: Learn together resets the article, with the promise of working together.
 * 21:26: Ed reremoves the same section as before, this time calling it "gossipy"
 * 21:28: Ed (finally) tells why he prefers to start over... by telling everyone a statement he wants to add to the article.
 * 21:40: Alan gives up, realizing that hours of hard work to add factual, cited material are not wasted