User talk:Maxjarl

Your edits to Max Hermansen
Are you trying to be funny with your edits to Max Hermansen? If not, then I'm sorely tempted to give you an unwelcome, not least because the source you cited for the claim about the "persecution" of Hermansen said nothing of the kind (the article is about how many of Fremskrittspartiet's voters support Pegida). ScepticWombat (talk) 13:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I am simply following up on all the shit that is written about me on RationalWiki. Non of it is true. Non of the references hold any confirmation that I am a rascist or any of the other terrible accusations.
 * Will you do anything about the terrible accusations?
 * I would be in jail if I was anything of these accusations. Don't you see that?  12:25, 27 May 2015‎


 * Ooookaaayy... While it's not absolutely impossible that you're a very deep cover liberal, I think you've now merited yourself an unwelcome.
 * Also, don't post on vandalise other editors' user pages; questions/comments go on user talk pages and should be correctly signed and indented. While we're at it: Don't mark revisions as minor unless they're spelling and grammar corrections or link fixes.
 * Furthermore, if you had actually bothered to check the edit history of the Hermansen article, you'd have known that I only corrected claims about the nature of PEGIDA, so, nice work barking up the wrong tree.
 * And no, you usually don't get thrown in jail in Norway for having nasty opinions, otherwise the jails would be overflowing with a beautiful mix of ultra right- and left-wing nutballs, Islamists and what have you. It's absolutely legal to have these opinions, just not to start persecuting/abusing those you happen to dislike. If you really are Max Hermansen (aka "Pegida Hermansen"), I'd have thought you already knew this, although such paranoia might just be a sign of the persecution complex that is apparently widespread among the Islamophobic/racist/"counter-jihad"/Eurabia/wingnut segment.
 * Oh yes, I almost forgot: What "terrible accusations" were you referring to anyway? ScepticWombat (talk) 13:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * From edit summaries I gather the accusation of being a racist. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 13:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * [EC] Which seems to be true and not an accusation: Max has mostly completed courses on behalf of us who hired consultant. The reason that he is no longer wanted for courses in winter are the utterances he has made. We have many Muslims in the courses and his opinions seem more exclusionary than inclusive. They are too extreme for us, says Charles Galaasen by Opplæringskontoret for service and transport. -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 13:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * And that makes me a rascist, you fascist? 14:04, 27 May 2015‎
 * Rather than just going on the attack, why don't you actually make your case, or, better yet, start by reading the RW's Newcomer's Guide, especially regarding how to sign and indent (hint: try clicking on this and this blue text which I've already linked to in my earlier post). ScepticWombat (talk) 14:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Doing and saying racist things makes someone a racist, like stealing makes someone a thief and lying makes someone a liar. People doing or saying what you don't like doesn't make them fascist.  Seems pretty basic.  -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 14:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't you know that Hitler and Mussolini got their start banning disruptive users from their websites? But seriously, fascism isn't really on the menu here, and nominally all it takes to get unbanned is a statement of good faith, and a promise not to repeat the particular errors that got you banned in the first place.  Until such time as all willingness to believe such statements is exhausted anyways.  ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 14:42, 27 May 2015 (UTC)