RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Homology

Homology | Result: Kept

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete

 * 1) Off mission. This article does nothing Wikipedia doesn't do better Hastur! (talk)  05:39, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Keep

 * Eh, I like it. 06:07, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Hello!-Flandres (talk) 06:49, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) "Wikipedia does it better" is a very weak reason for delete. Spud (talk) 07:01, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Is having nothing to do with our mission and RationalWiki not being an encyclopedia better?-Hastur! (talk) 07:03, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes. Those are always good reasons to delete. But I don't agree with you in this case. Spud (talk) 07:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Keep. It's missional in so far as it supports evolution pages. Bongolian (talk) 07:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) It's arguably marginal, but I'd say we should keep.Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 11:47, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 3) — Oxyaena  Harass  11:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 4) Maybe expand the article a bit? It's quite short. Gunther1987 (talk) 11:55, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 5) Keep. We're not an encyclopedia, but it has a number of WhatLinksHere results that mean it's presence should probably be kept. 10:47, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 10:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Rename

 * 1) As I said in the talk page (which was ignored), the article should/could contain analogy and homology. Those are quintessential to understanding evolution, just like microevolution and macroevolution are. And the topic is on-point in regards to the mission statement.

10:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)