User talk:Arthropleura

E-mail me if you want me. I might check my inbox in the next year.


 * I would have emailed you BUT IT'S NOT ENABLED. Anyhow this is what I would have written:

Cur, you might not believe this, but I do sympathise. Trouble is you're talking to people who speak a different language: they speak "older". When I was your age I was a major loner: undersized; late to puberty; not pretty; intelligent: all things that alienated me from my peers. Then, however (50+ years ago) there was nowhere that we could talk to adults so I immersed myself in books, I suppose that you are doing the same with the internet.

Unfortunately there are things we learn with time, like how to behave in company; when people are being serious; and how to know when they are joking. As Ace said, one thing you learn is to have multiple external personalities: one for home; one for work or school; & one for when with friends or equals. This isn't deceit: it's called being a rounded person.

You really ought to try to find people of a similar age & experience as yourself, there must be somewhere on the net.

Don't be a bloody martyr, stick around as CUR. One thing is not to try too hard, don't sock up, just lurk & comment occasionally, very occasionally. We will recognise you, (I've tried to disappear & sock up as a different person :- can't be done: you give yourself away if you've any personality at all & you have)

I don't know if you go to school, from what I understand your bro is homeschooled(?), but are you sure there's no-one of a similar age to you who might be able to talk on web or RL?

Whether you're male or female, pick a geek of the opposite gender: (the geek thing is to have some common ground [sorry]) (the gender thing is to avoid competition)

Have you ever been in a supermarket where there's been a screaming kid? His Mom'll slap him down to shut him up, but she still loves him. We've acted like Mom - we'll forget it soon as long as you don't do it again!

XX

Terry (Toast)

20:40, 22 April 2009 (EDT)

It's enabled now. -- 20:46, 22 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Take the above as being emailed then. ;-) 20:53, 22 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I miss him already :( - User   21:34, 22 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Email, you has it.  21:44, 22 April 2009 (EDT)
 * @Palpatine: You got mail! -- 22:04, 22 April 2009 (EDT)


 * The Emperor has sent you a Sith Holocron(via Yahoo) that contains forbidden knowledge. 22:33, 22 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Darth CUR has a ring to it, don't it? -- 22:56, 22 April 2009 (EDT)

I have sent you a very important email. Certain search rankings on certain popular search engines will certainly be searched. Also, your to-do list looks like a lot of fun.
I have sent you a very important email. Certain search rankings on certain popular search engines will certainly be searched. Also, your to-do list looks like a lot of fun.

You've been Kenned. So there :P  ħ uman  22:38, 22 April 2009 (EDT)

Intercom
How were you able to send an intercom message while blocked? -- Nx  / talk 22:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I really don't know. All I know is that under no circumstances should that ability be changed, in case something like that happens again for a longer period and no one notices. -- 22:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Your block must've expired. The intercom only fails when you try to send the message, not when you click write new message. You cannot send intercom messages when blocked or vandal binned, and that's a good thing. We shouldn't block users anyway, so there's no danger of someone accidentally getting locked out. -- Nx  / talk 22:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I see your point, unfortuately, you (notice the pronoun you, as in RationalWiki), do block users. -- 22:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You were blocked for five minutes. Not the end of the world. -- Nx  / talk 22:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't be an issue except that Felidae is in danger of being deleted. -- 22:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Doesn't matter. Your scenario is of a user blocked for a long time who would have no way of communicating that his block was incorrect (which isn't true, since we have email). Spamming the intercom won't help your cause. -- Nx  / talk 22:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Email
Theemperor caste resurrect! (via yahoo, of course)  20:55, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No one cares, but you need to change the username in your user page dpl lists. 22:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

BorkBot
PyWikipediaBot already has a bot that does that, it's called weblinkchecker.py. You'll need the family file I just posted. -- Nx  / talk 20:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * As soon as you're done, could you please show me how to install it on BorkBot's monobook and then make him a bot? -- 20:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not installed into monobook. Read this: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Using_the_python_wikipediabot -- Nx  / talk 20:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Cats
Sorry I suggested deleting your pet article. I thought you'd left, because you said you'd left. If you're not leaving, it's misleading to say you're leaving.-- 09:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I tried to make it very clear it was temporary, obviously I didn't succeed. -- 19:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Upset
I would be very upset if ToP left because of you. He was great fun. Ace McWickedbitch and moan 21:31, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Human claims he didn't. He's done this before, and might be taking a leaf out of my book and hiding for a bit. -- 22:49, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Heh, you didnt really hide though did you. Ace McWickedbitch and moan 22:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Tried, and would have if the Felidae issue hadn't come up. -- 23:16, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You are way too emotionally involved with your pet project here. I have read comparisons to 🇰🇪 and agree with them.  If we allowed fascism on this site, you'd probably use it.  01:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * He left because his own attitude & intolerance was disappointing him (paraphrase). He also had RL reasons. 02:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * CUR's right, it wasn't because of him. Not quoting pmail here, though. ToP has RL things going on - nothing bad.  02:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Are you disabled in any manner?
I have a very low IQ and I'm lactose intolerant. I'm also Jewish and from the South. Do you have any disabilities? 01:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Being from the South is a disability? --Kels 01:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I have high IQ and a drinking problem but my biggest disability is my extremely good looks, my voice of thick timbre, my charm, my wit and the fact I am so damn desirable. Ace McWickedbitch and moan 01:15, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Being from South Texas and having a slight accent is a disability when you're an atheist jew lawyer in Chicago. I should have been more clear. I also have a high IQ and a pretty serious drinking problem, but none of those other things. 01:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * That's quite the talent, having a low and high IQ at the same time. --Kels 01:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I have lots of disabilities. Mainly, mainlining RW.  01:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Human - should I stab my neighbor for his Goldmund loudspeakers and Denon 5805?  01:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I guess that depends on what he plays on them and how loud? 02:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I am not sure why haven't stabbed them already. Ace McWickedbitch and moan 01:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Still at the office and I ran out of rye. :(  01:57, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Lame. I have the day off and plenty of rye. Ace McWickedbitch and moan 01:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

I have to put up with you lot every goddamned day...Other than that, (and the voices) I'm fine. CЯacke ® 22:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey Cracker! You got the voices too? Wheeeeeee! 22:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The voices in my head, I calls them "toast", "cracker", "crazy kiwi" - hey, them's all food! But I'm not hungry...  04:44, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Wait, how do you prepare a "kels", then? --Kels 04:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Slowly, and with marmalade. 04:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I prepare Human in a slow cooker with rosemary and red wine. Ace McWickedbitch and moan 04:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Who's Rosemary and why does she complain about communists? 05:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I am making the awesome Hannibal Lecter noise he makes when he talks about eating brains. No one can hear me though damnit. Ace McWickedbitch and moan 05:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * TURN IT UP then! Oh, yeah, you're on the upside down top of the world.  Eh, the sound will get hear in a day or two, weather willing.  05:09, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Voting on wigo entries you add
I've noticed that you always vote up a wigo entry immediately after adding one... when this happens, I always vote that entry down. --  Nx / talk 22:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Very well. I will stop doing that. --  Nx / talk 23:21, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I disagree, Nx. If the author of a WIGO isn't going to vote for it, who is? 22:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Everyone else? --  Nx / talk 22:30, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I do with mine. Somebody's got to. Totnesmartin 22:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * EC) Apart from which, unless you're monitoring something not available to the most of us, how do you know it's him? Could be anyone who happens to land there coincidentally. I recommend an up vote from the WIGOer. 22:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * (EC) No, I'm not spying on him. But every time I check a new wigo, if it's by CUR, it has a +1 vote already. I haven't noticed that in other people's wigos. --  Nx / talk 22:39, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I always vote my own WIGO's because if I added them then I obviously think its funny. Ace McWickedbitch and moan 22:38, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I view it as a result of thinking of WIGO as a contest of who can get the most votes, and IMHO that is detrimental. --  Nx / talk 22:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * ec I agree with Ace. I don't WIGO, but if I did, I'd see no problem with voting it up- since I thought it was noteworthy, I'd vote it up anyways.  Unless, of course, the WIGOer is not allowed to vote up their own WIGOs, which is just stupid- no one would WIGO anymore.   22:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC) MOAR  Of course its a contest Nx- why do you think we have Best of CP?
 * Well, if it's a contest, then it's cheating. --  Nx / talk 22:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Why do you think we do it? PS add a tag at the end of your post.   22:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't vote on mine own. I let 'em float or (moar likely) sink of their own accord. You'll notice I do like to tinker with other boyz toyz er, ah, WIGO items...to ensure the lulziest WIGO posssible. CЯacke ® 22:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You only get one vote anyway, so it's not a big deal. If I added one I hit "up" as soon as I saved it.  It only makes sense.  And Nx, maybe there is a regular lurker who just thinks CUR is really funny?   23:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Here I come late to the party, I actually always vote mine down. Unless it is blogs because I am usually posting a fellow RationalWikians blog post in which case I just leave it. 03:50, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I usually vote yours down, too, as a matter of principle. Of course, if later someone fixes them, I might vote them back up again.  05:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

A little present for you
I thought you might like this. 09:16, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Political compass template?
Um, any particular reason you're taking away the coordinate code? 23:57, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * See the talk page. I use IE, and it causes the thing to float in my userboxbox. -- 23:58, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Talk page? it's empty. Not that I disagree, CUR. 00:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Does the moral politics userbox do the same in IE? 00:05, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. -- 00:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You use IE?!?!!!?!!!!? Tsk tsk tsk. I'm not going to shill or anything firefox, but there are many, MANY browsers that are infinitely more well adept to render web pages than that piece o' shite. Not that I'm one to judge: I use Vista, and it's a bloody wonder I haven't converted to Linux after the problems I've had with it. -- 14:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * He's parentally constrained. 14:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * :( -- 15:12, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You can run FF off a USB stick. Nutty Roux
 * Not sure CUR's got the knowhow. 15:16, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You fools think Firefox is the finest of all browsers, but you forget that nine out of ten Evil Overlords agree that Chrome is the best for plotting World Domination!!!!!  21:01, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Google already rules the world! Give us other Evil Overlords a chance! -- 00:40, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Peregrine Falcon Opera will destroy the Fox. 00:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

now what do I do?
Comedy gold. Don't stop. Mei 00:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree. But, to keep you going, I'll give you a hint: . Read this. And when I say read, I mean READ. --  Nx / talk 07:38, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Take the test
Here. EddyP 16:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

New Lands
Well, if you're going to use wp:Charles Fort books as section headers, so am I. Totnesmartin 22:32, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * What the heck? -- 22:34, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, just being random. Ignore. Totnesmartin 22:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

A gift
Ask and ye shall recieve. 23:19, 10 May 2009 (UTC)




 * I shall now exercise my GIANT persecution complex. -- 23:24, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * * insert insult*, *insert first salvo of an argument*, *insert blaming of CUR*. 00:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I just took a dump and blocked the toilet. Thanks a lot CUR.  86.46.232.102 13:35, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * My dog just got hit by a tram. Thanks, Arthropleura. 13:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm getting married in a week. I blame you, CUR. Bondurant 14:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Is that good or bad? -- 21:30, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The RIAA’s “parental advisory warning” is a tremendously flawed content labeling system because it is essentially self-regulating. It is a voluntary setup—artists and labels make their own decisions about whether or not content is “explicit”, and this leads to irregularities and lapses—both accidental and intentional—in the system’s safeguards. Some indie labels, particularly ones which possess a liberal conceit and which are inclined to see RIAA labeling as censorship, completely ignore the content labeling system, which means that a lot of indie albums which contain some frightfully explicit stuff are left completely unlabeled. Meanwhile, major-label groups which crave an “edgy” image and the “teen rebel” demographic which comes with it are left free to label their albums as “explicit” even if they contain only mild obscenities or a single explicit song. Because the system contains no gradients or provisions for various amounts/levels of obscenity, all labeled albums, no matter how explicit, are branded with the same sticker of shame, and as a result albums which feature only mild swearing may be denoted by the same label which adorns some of the most profane albums in the universe. Rather than use a system of grades, like, say, the MPAA’s (imperfect, but at least somewhat nuanced) rating system, the geniuses at the RIAA has decreed that albums are either “explicit” or they’re not—and the overall effect of this oversight dilutes the warning’s credibility as a labeling system.
 * Moreover, some truly vile content ends up being passed over because it isn’t “explicit”, even though it is objectionable—case in point: “Run For Your Life”, a song from the Beatles’ Rubber Soul in which the narrator warns his girlfriend, in no uncertain terms, that he will kill her if he catches her with another man. If I had a nine-year old daughter, this is notsomething I’d want her to hear on her own—yet, because of the RIAA’s tawdry obsession with “explicit” content, there are thousands of parents who have no idea that a depiction of domestic violence which may potentially be far more damaging than a few stray swear words lies waiting behind the cheerful exterior of another unlabeled, “kid-friendly” Beatles album.
 * CUR, it’s all your fault. You are somehow responsible. I am not sure how—perhaps you have been conspiring with Tipper Gore or something. Conspiring...retroactively. Yes. This must be it. The electrocutioner 06:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That was brilliant. And, yeah, Rubber Soul should come with a sticker bearing Lennon's later apology for it.  01:26, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Halp! Somebody help me this this so it looks like the userbox show options on this. from Arthropleura (Talk), group Random at 20:45, 13 May 2009
Halp! Someone is spamming the whole fucking site because he needs help with his own silly little problem! Amin7b5 20:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks like it is "working" already, but not playing well with userboxboxtop/bottom? 21:05, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Writing. Learn how.
The names of planets, like Earth, are capitalised. Thanks. Amin7b5 15:28, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Announcement
I shall henceforth be pretentious and refer to you in the correct Latin case. That is all. 20:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Cat
Why did you Remove the Conspiracy Theory cat from Biblical longevity ? Have you Read the Talk Page?--Tolerance 22:48, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It also isn't a conspiracy theory. -- 22:49, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Have you REad the talk page?--Tolerance 22:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * From your Silence I Assume you have not read the Talk page. Please do so before Making any Changes to the Article.--Tolerance 22:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Schlafly Doo
Thanks for giving me my own category for Schlafly Doo. You're a few years younger than me, but you're clearly a lot better at all this HTML jargon and whatnot. Also, see the message I left on your ASS talk page. Thanks man! 20:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You can leave the ASS pages in your userspace, I dunno if I'll use them in the Schlafly Doo stories. 20:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You might want them for the Final Battle™. And I've built you a car. It's a start, but it will need a bit of work. -- 20:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've moved them back to your userspace. If I use them in a story I'll move them back to fun, but for now just keep them here. I literally think them up as I go, so I have no idea when they could crop up. Also, thanks for tha RWW article. 18:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Redlinks
all that bot sstuff you wrote is full of weird redlinks that are now clogging recent changes. When are you going to remove them? Totnesmartin 22:22, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Old threads
Interrupting a two-month-dead thread that wasn't even about you? Whatever for? Totnesmartin 20:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I won't do that then. -- 21:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Shall i comment out the one you did, or will you? sactually no, I'll do it, you've got other things to do (see post above). Totnesmartin 21:40, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Grammeur
i no grammuar, I went to a grammar school. My mistakes are caused by typing quickly to avoid edit conflicts. Totnesmartin 23:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Are you still here?
And if so, why? Can we expect a check from your parents for tolerating you, entertaining you, even educating you? 06:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks like he is gone. Too bad, come back and visit. 22:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed, but it is understandable, as he himself has been misunderstood throughout his tenure. Please do keep me posted in regards to the new wiki you plan on starting.  I may be interested in contributing perhaps.   22:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, he didnt help himself by helping people understand him. Just saying...Ace McWickedi9 23:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

I think you meant "clique", not "cliche"
Use a dictionary. 08:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, and we aren't a closed, gated community just because you can't climb the social ladder. 08:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Goodbye... again
Not that I ever talked with you on religion all that much, but weren't you fairly antitheistic? Well, if you've got your reasons, you got your reasons. Take care, and let me know how the new wiki's going, you got my email. 09:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Bye, again then.--Bobbing up 09:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC)--Bobbing up 09:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Cripes, I hadn't even realized he'd gone. You'd think I would have noticed the silence and the fact that four hours went by without him doing something totally thoughtless and irresponsible.  Good luck with your new Wiki, Arthur, with hard work maybe you'll be able to get as notable as aSK! --Kels 16:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Miss you, cheetah


22:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

A-hem
In accordance with community guidelines, I've sent you a very important rather unimportant email. Open it with leisure. 15:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Heya
Jsut droppin' in to give you a fist jab, then wandering out. Hope you had a good summer, and if you read this, you are in good health. 04:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * What he said. Ace McWickedModel 500 04:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Oi! Oi! Oi!
I'd like a rum and coke. How's life in the fast lane treatin' ya Mr Resistor? 23:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Whoa
Gone? Really? Wow, who'd a thunk it? 86.46.232.96 01:30, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey there
I hope things are well, CUR. Corry 01:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Cheetahs in the gnus news.
Keeping some fast company. RaoulDuke 14:30, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't give a fuck if you've left
Take this! Jfaartz (talk) 22:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

w
CUR! CUR! Where is my CUR? Alas, I have no one to argue with about cats. RW is less fun without a CUR to annoy us all. --  = w =  22:03, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * What about cats? &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 22:04, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * We use to argue about Felidae. Those were the good old days. --  = w =  22:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It was more fun than arguing with TK or MC. Acei9 22:07, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * And involved less fighting and more cats. Oh where is my CUR gone? --  = w =  22:08, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I miss this little Rudiger. First personal I emailed extensively after joining RationalWiki. 23:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Arthur was great fun to fight with, because he didn't intentional cause trouble like the other two, it just kind of happened. 23:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If I managed to not cause trouble, would people be able to be polite to me? -- 18:20, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Seems like the trouble you caused had something to do with your perception that people weren't polite to you. 18:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sure, by this point, 95% of RationalWiki has forgotten about the past anyways. 19:38, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

YAY! CUR is back! P-Foster (talk) 19:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * "If I managed to not cause trouble, would people be able to be polite to me?" You were decidedly rude to me yourself over on the Werelist CUR. Would you be able to be polite? I ain't bending over backwards for no one. Aceword up 21:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * "If I managed to not cause trouble, would people be able to be polite to me?" If you managed not to split the poor defenceless infinitive, it would be a start.  But seriously, good to see you buddy.   23:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

First off, Ace, I may have come off as a bit abrupt, but that's more or less because the only memory I have of you was you swearing loudly at me.

Anyway, I'm not actually back. Shouldn't have posted in the first place. Sorry for waking everybody up. *kicks self*

You may now resume your regular programming.
 * Dude, if you look back over your werelist messages you'll see I was extremely polite and engaging. You just didn't like it because I was querying your silly Wolf-Boy talk and then you shut off debate when I asked you to substantiate your claims. Ace McfuckingAwesome 20:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Sweet Creeping Jesus!
You're back! I was just reading Debate:Otherkin, hit RC, and there you are! Acei9 23:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello, Arthur. 23:29, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I knew some day you'd return. 23:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The prodigal son has returned! ! -- 23:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm back. But only to say never mind about the wiki bit and I might rejoin in the summer when my parents let me. Till then, and I hope that when I come back things work out better. -- 01:09, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yo, what up with the folks? They laying on ya heavy like? Want me to "take care" of them? Acei9 01:15, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey CUR, "I remember that talk about there possibly being a side wiki that I could try working on" one idea, if you can hold your nose while doing it, would be to join A Storehouse of Knowledge and write articles on zoology etc. for them. Oh, just don't put all those silly "evolution" lies in the articles... Hope you are well.  00:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * [[image:Smiley.gif|1000px]] That is all. 19:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey, I hope things are going well. Take care of yourself. Corry (talk) 07:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

BUY MY NEW BOOK!!!!
Natural Cures for Death Human Doesn't Want You To Know About!!!!!! ON SALE NOW!!!!!! FrankThePseudoscientist (talk) 23:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I have sent you a very important email...
...the subject of which may be relevant to your interests. Totnesmartin (talk) 20:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Where are you?
I figured you, more than anybody, would want to be around for the first annual International Feliday! 06:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

I really miss CUR
You contributed to a much more fun and healthy RW when you were around to Raz. Those days are past, but some of us are still anarchists fighting the good fight. Drop by and say hello. 13:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC) B♭maj7 "If two men say they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong." 14:05, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Wasn't fun for me.
 * Well, CUR, you may be a filthy furry but I empathize with you. "Wasn't fun for me" should be this community's unofficial slogan.  It's all fun and games for the bullies, but what about the people getting stomped on?  And if you were still here, I probably would have cut down on the fursecution whenever you'd be around.--  03:45, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It wasn't a furry that got me flack. In any event... I don't believe I can come back. There are too many bad memories. I don't even understand how I thought back then when I was on here; it was probably because I was going through major social troubles in real life, so I kind of stuck to the first community I found, even if half the time it was verbally stomping on me. And yeah, I was an idiot half the time. But my position on the matter is that very few people here are exemplars of politeness, and I've tried to change (and may have succeeded) in being much more polite and calm and rational. Still a bit arrogant, though. But I've changed. I don't know how much the site has.

There are some of you I remember and rather like; SuperJosh, The Emperor, Javascap, Weaseloid... but the fact is that I can't bring myself to trust the entire site. Part of this is probably due to spending I don't know how long thinking very badly of the community here at large. But part of it is a completely rational reaction to what I experienced.

So goodbye, RationalWiki. I don't understand you. I don't understand myself here when I look back. I wish I could trust you, because I believe that you serve a function, and I would be pleased to advance some of your causes. But like I've said--I've changed. I've changed in that I've grown more tolerant of people with beliefs that are different than mine, so that I don't automatically make fun of or scorn anyone's beliefs if I can't stick something disproving it in their face and explain it in terms a five year old should be able to understand. And I remember RationalWiki as having a noticeable antitheistic streak--understandable and perhaps exaggerated by later perception, but I don't buy into antitheism, which I predict would put me on a definite angle of friction with many.

And so I say it again: Goodbye, RationalWiki. I do not know whether to hate you, love you, admire you, or pity you. I suspect it is a mix of all four.

There are two things I would appreciate done, RationalWiki. Firstly, I want this to be copied into my userpage. Second, I want you to remember me, specifically remembering me to ensure that another CUR does not happen. Because sooner or later, I predict, there will be another teenager like I was, and he or she will set himself apart. And when that happens, when he or she is making an incredible nuisance of him or herself and is of questionable mental stability, I want you to point him or her to what happened here. And I want you to give him or her my email address, so that I can attempt to prevent another one of me.

I may have been arrogant when writing this essay. I may have thought of myself as more significant than I am. But I did not go through drafts and I only changed things to correct typos. I say it as I thought it. If anybody has any questions or wants to talk to me (please, I really don't want to get into any long-drawn out arguments that go over the same points over and over, so don't contact me if you are planning on doing that), then you know where to find me.

-- Cheetah
 * Done as requested. AceModerator 03:26, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Arthropleura. Well-written post that. You might be interested in this person, who, from what I've gleaned, is just the type of neo-CUR you might want to talk to.  03:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I tell this guy needs your help the most. AceModerator 03:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Word to that. Hope all is well with you, kid. P-Foster Talk " Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing. " 03:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Cheetahs
4 days ago I was sitting in an open-air truck watching 2 wild cheetah go about their morning routines. They stalked some impala but were ultimately unsuccessful and spent the rest of the morning taking it easy in the shade. You would have loved it. AceModerator 07:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Old stuff...
...