File talk:Otterman.JPG

OMFG, he's SO HAWT!!! -- 19:11, 10 April 2009 (EDT)&mdash; Unsigned, by: Theemperor & Mei / talk / contribs
 * 0.o Really creepy, in a vauge way.  User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 19:11, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I had to encourage him, didn't I? Fortunately, as long as it's in my user space, he can't add them. -- 19:14, 10 April 2009 (EDT) P.S.- since when was this a furry art gallery? -- 19:14, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

Copyright
This is very clearly copyrighted work (signature) and should not be here. -- 19:23, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

It's just a signature, it dosen't say copyright skugell-wolf '06 User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 19:26, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I have no idea why CUR would object to this picture, it is a mystery. User:Mei 19:28, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Actually, I quite like it. What annoys me is the way it will be used. It will be used, of this I am almost certain, to mock the people who created it. It also is probably copyrighted. If we had permission, I would be all for it (note that the photographs are just, in my opinion, rather stupid (no offense intended, Kels)). -- 19:30, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * What? What photographs? What? MeiRobot1 19:32, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Cur probably likes it so much he's Highlighting just to read something that you already know the content of? That's low, just low.  User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 19:35, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Unlikely- I can't type and ******** at the same time. -- 19:40, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * We need Ace to come here and make a hilariously inappropriate(by CUR standards) comment now. User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 19:44, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Drama in 3 acts. -- 19:46, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

Can we not pick on CUR all the time? Wait until he does something silly (he will!) & then lambast him. Prodding him is rather futile - brings bear baiting to mind. 19:49, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * We need an Acequote template the goes something like this: "Just taking a break from watching Arsenal sodomize Liverpool, exposing myself to underage girls outside the pub, and putting away my twelveteenth pint of export, and I have come back here to see you excrementalists' spout this unfunny shite. Next time go get fucked and leave me out of it.  Toodles, Ace."  Thee Nuttish  Talk 20:00, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

You forgot to add mentions of hangovers, and random girls asking to see his penis in front of his girlfriend. User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 20:02, 10 April 2009 (EDT)


 * The word fuck should appear like a wandering ghost forever divorced from contextual reality. And I like Ace. MeiRobot1 20:05, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

We all do, he's hilarious. User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 20:07, 10 April 2009 (EDT)


 * (ECx2)Two things: First, just because there's no actual copyright notice does not mean it's free to use. Unless someone can link to a page telling us what the status is, then we're gonna have to assume it's copyright.  Second, I agree with Toast.  Making fun of CUR constantly has gotten very old by now, and it's just stupid and classless to attack folks without provocation.  It's a decent image, but on both those grounds I say kill it. --Kels 20:08, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * First: TOP should provide us with a link. Second, it wasn't to make fun of me, merely to prove that there was furry otter art. And I agree with you about the quality (though I'd substitue decent with really good). -- 20:22, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Eh, I dunno about "really good". Good, yes.  Something like this has it beat all hollow, quality-wise. --Kels 20:28, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

Searched for it, and found the link. Just google images "otter furry" (no quotes) and it's the fifth or so result. The site is NSFW, and you have to have SafeSearch off. User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 20:26, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * * looks over site* Actually, most of it is perfectly fine, there's only one or two NSFW pictures (if you don't count artistic nudity as porn, which I don't). -- 20:46, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Take it down, that's fine--I was just proving CUR wrong. TheoryOfPractice 20:27, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Don't take it down. It haz a purpose now. If it is free use, then we should keep it. -- 20:29, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * "If it is free use". I doubt it, artwork is generally assumed to be under copyright unless specified otherwise, isn't it? --Kels 20:31, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Ah, just found a copy here, complete with copyright. Now that's a default on that site for all art to be marked as copyright, but for our purposes I think it counts. --Kels 20:58, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

Wait, CUR thought there wasn't any otter furry? That's crazy talk. A friend of mine does smilidon furry art, for crying out loud, otter isn't much of a stretch. --Kels 20:32, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * No, I thought there were no people like this guy. I wouldn't assert there are no otter furries, not when I know three otter therians. -- 20:38, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Oh, otter fursuiters. I don't know much about that community, it's pretty much convention-specific.  I did find this rather impressive bit of work on Google Search. --Kels 20:44, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Actually, I'm not sure our cheetah friend qualifies as a fur-suiter. -- 20:46, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * CATS costumes qualify, I would imagine bodypaint does too. --Kels 20:58, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * You may ask what I am thinking. Until you do, you are not knowing. -- 21:10, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Not caring, either. --Kels 21:13, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Thanks. -- 21:17, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

(referencing comment a while back) I find it funny that as soon as I made a comment about a furry site being a pr0n location, and then giving instructions on how to reach it, Cur automatically makes a beeline to it. I bet he's got a massive stash of furry "artistic nudity" on his computer. User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 21:15, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Actually, if the pic was pr0n, I wouldn't have gone to it. Since it was perfectly fine, I made a beeline because non-pornagraphic anthromorphic art is something I find interesting. And I wouldn't feel any need to save it, either. -- 21:17, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I don't have much "artistic nudity" on mine. It's mostly porn. --Kels 21:26, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

Keep
21:28, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 21:29, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

Don't
Not even worth discussing. No fair use = it goes. TheoryOfPractice 21:30, 10 April 2009 (EDT) It seems meanspirited. MeiRobot1 21:30, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Mei, it wasn't meanspirited. He uploaded it to prove me wrong, pure and simple. -- 21:33, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * CUR = wrong & pure & simple? Works for me. MeiRobot1 21:39, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

No fair use, obvious. --Kels 21:40, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

I'll have nachos
Mmm, nachos... --Kels 21:40, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

I prefer Chipotle. User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 21:41, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Another Chipotles fan?

She'll be riding six white horses
This is the real issue here folks. MeiRobot1 21:42, 10 April 2009 (EDT)

If the answer is no
We can always link here. -- 21:43, 10 April 2009 (EDT)