Talk:ASchlafly

Why do we need this particular double re-direct? TheoryOfPractice 20:44, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 * Doesn't seem to be a double redirect. We might not necessarily need it, but we wouldn't gain anything by deleting it.   20:49, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 * Someone seems to have fixed the double-re-directedness of it--it was a redirect from Fun:Idiot to here and then to a Schlafly article of some sort...TheoryOfPractice 20:52, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 * Oh jesus, not "fun:idiot" again.  20:54, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 * It gets better--the Wolf-Boy is the one who brought it back. Sigh. TheoryOfPractice 20:57, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 * Count yourselves lucky we didn't have all those vegetable redirects to still clean up.... Are those all gone now?  20:56, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 * Huh?  20:57, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 * Oh, last year some time there was a mad rush of blood to the head as everyone tried to redirect as many vegetables as possible to the Andy article.  Lordy Lord, the things we kids do without supervision.   I see there's still quite a few weirdo redirects out there.   DogP  21:08, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 * Ah, I think I came across this page before & wondered what the hell it was about.  21:15, 3 February 2009 (EST)