User talk:Ace McWicked/Archive16

You speak, but I hear...
Love ya, ya big bastard. -- PsyGremlin  06:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Today's Bible verse
From the Book of Levi 13:6 Now that's what you call a poesklap. -- PsyGremlin  11:37, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Fuck you
I'm just a human being. I have feelings too. Every jibe, every insinuation cuts deep into my soul. I have failings like everybody else. Can't you people be kind for once? Is it really a big deal that I'm a gluttonous, bloated cunt of a lardball?--Elvis (talk) 04:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

odd nz question
hi there, I recently heard a random urban legend type story about a series of suicides ar hundred years or so ago at a marist seminary in Hawkes Bay, near Napier. The place is a winery now. The basic gist was in 1903 a student committed suicide there, the brothers sealed up the room as it was until two later students broke in some time in the thirties, and both of them committed suicide within a few years. I know where the place is, but haven't turned up anything else online. I have no idea if you are anywhere near Napier, or if this is a common story and my search engine sucks, but you were the first accesable New Zealander I  thought of. I know it's an odd request but any light you may be able to shed would be great. Or you can tell me to fuck off. Thanks`   joyaBAD KITTY!         04:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you are talking about. AceModerator 06:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd guess that if the top result on google is this very page, there isn't much basis for this legend of yours. Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem 06:20, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * i am inclined to agree. it was pretty random. Joya not signed in

This.
THIS. P-Foster Talk " "Santorum is the cream rising to the top." " 16:43, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks like shit. Particularly when I have just purchased this....... AceModerator 20:24, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Nice. P-Foster Talk " "Santorum is the cream rising to the top." " 05:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Was expensive. When it arrives I'll photograph it in my house and send you the pic. And say "Hahahaha". Fucker. AceModerator 08:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I've just finished reading Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas again. My favourite quote remains "We had several narrow escapes: at one point I tried to drive the Great Red Shark into the laundry room of the Landmark Hotel - but the door was too narrow and the people inside seemed dangerously excited." 22:44, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

OWS is still a current event
Might I direct your attention to this? We ought to put the current event template back. (Btw, removing templates is not a minor edit.) At any rate, I am going to change 'was' back to 'is.'
 * Hardly a "current event". That is like calling today a current event. It has long lost its presence in the media for example and the only people still involved are worthless scum bags and filthy banshees. AceModerator 19:54, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The fact that the media ceases to report on it does not in any way make it any less a current event. As you are aware, part of our mission here at RW is to shed light on how the mass media treats each subject, especially when the media misrepresents a subject. That the mass media chooses not discuss it or chooses to discuss it accurately or chooses to discuss it inaccuraely means nothing as to the reality of the subject. An although the jury is still out on whether or not I am a filthy banshee (it seems they lean towards yes on the banshee and no on the filthy), and even if I were a worthless scumbag, which the jury will agonize over when they finally get past filthy banshee, that also does not have any impact on the current event status on the movement. The destruction of the Congo is without a doubt being carried out by scumbags, and I don't like. However, it's still being done and it's still a current event. Rand0 (talk) 21:52, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Still, I wouldn't call it a "current event". I would call it "Old news". AceModerator 22:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I hate to say I told you so, but I told you so. The question finally now is, Will Obama disavow the unsavory elements and hate in a movement he's nurtured and fostered, and identifies so closely with?  nobsI'm not a doctor but I play one with the girls 22:04, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You told me so? What the fuck are you talking about Rob? You haven't told me nothing. AceModerator 22:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, so maybe it is 'ongoing' rather than a 'current event.' It is still an 'is' not a 'was.' Rand0 (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Dirty hippies. AceModerator 22:54, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

The word is "rhyme"
16:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Hey Ace
You gonna due your job for once and step up and do something about Mikalos trolling? Or are you still a slave to partiality, mindless partisanship, and hell-bent on turning RW into a CP-like totalitarian cesspit? nobsbullies are people, too. 03:42, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I am on holiday again, sort your own mess out. AceModerator 03:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Question
Holiday is fun.. Whats the weather like where you are at? It's been unseasonably warm for the last... half year here. -- il' Dictator   Mikal  03:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Surprisingly mild. The weather was supposed to be awful so I left town for a few days and headed into wine country but the weather robots got it wrong. Kinda autumnal but pleasent. Been spending most of my time lounging around with the wife drinking Veuve in the bath as opposed to sitting outside though did pop out for a few gins in the sun earlier. AceModerator 03:49, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds quite nice. The weather suddenly dropped from mid summer to early may weather here, a good 30 F, but still warm by about 15 for this time of the year... we might get storms like we did a few years back to make up for that though.-- il' Dictator   Mikal  03:51, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

yahoo e-mail address
I sent you an e-mail to the yahoo e-mail address you have sent me stuff from in the past. Tmtoulouse (talk) 05:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Checking now. AceModerator 05:38, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

you know, we may have just
escaped a bout of really major HCM from developing further, if calm heads can prevail. -- il' Dictator   Mikal  02:39, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I will continue to hand out short "calm down Brx" blocks if he continues working everyone up. AceModerator 02:41, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Those don't seem to "calm him down". I forgot the score in the tennis match, is he currently not a sysop again?  02:55, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I gets him away from here for an hour. Then if he comes back and carries on he'll get another hour. Like with CUR I am sick of hosting this guys temper tantrums when he doesn't get his own way. I'll ask him to think about his current actions, ask him again, warn him he is really starting to piss people off, warn him he'll be blocked for an hour and then, if all else fails, block him for an hour. Really, that seems the only option. AceModerator 02:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You know how he was complaining about me blocking him earlier? I actually unblocked him after blocking him. I'm glad it's come to this. He won't survive his own stupidity. 03:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Weren't you reprimanded once already
for putting this shit on users pages? Wanna go to the Coop again, punk-ass? nobsCorporations are people, too. 00:06, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Not that I can recall.... AceModerator 00:09, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Should you care to discuss: innocuity
What is the null hypothesis for the innocuity of an activity? I'm guessing "unknown". What would justify a classification of innocuous or harmful/injurious? Occasionaluse (talk) 23:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Say, that's great. AceModerator 00:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * obviously, innocuity is relative. even a man as big as yourself can admit that. Occasionaluse (talk) 00:11, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'd love a beer right now. AceModerator 00:14, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * ...he said without a hint of irony. Occasionaluse (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Irony? That's that thing I use to get wrinkles out of my shirt, eh? AceModerator 00:18, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

True story
Experiencing hallucinations under the influence of marijuana can be a sign of underlying psychosis. The symptoms of psychosis are treatable, and those who are treated can have full and happy lives, particularly if they receive early treatment. God bless. Occasionaluse (talk) 01:16, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Cool story but I prefer it in gray. AceModerator 02:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * "[T]he induction of psychotic symptoms (i.e. hallucinations, extreme paranoia, "going feral") in the context of cannabis use may be associated with a pre-existing vulnerability for psychosis." Just get checked out. Occasionaluse (talk) 02:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Get checked out for what? I have never had psychotic symptoms. AceModerator 02:52, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * "I myself have turned feral in the past until I realised what this "innocuous" pot was doing to me." That sounds like a psychotic symptom. If you think "pot was doing something to you", it was possibly exacerbating something that was already wrong with you. It's worth investigating. Occasionaluse (talk) 03:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have never had psychotic symptoms. AceModerator 03:11, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * What did the pot do to you, Ace? Occasionaluse (talk) 03:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Fucked my short term memory and made me not want to do anything but play PlayStation and eat. You know, what it is supposed to do. AceModerator 03:15, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Pot doesn't play playstation, people play playstation.
 * When I say "...made me not want to do anything but playstation" the me refers to me as Ace. I wasn't speaking as the pot. I can see how you were confused, what with your daily pot consumption. AceModerator 03:42, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

You should really consider growing a mustache
20:41, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I shaved mine this morning - it was only a little one that I hadn't attended to over the weekend but I have a meeting this morning. Though I am slightly beardy at the moment due to my razor/trimmer running out of batteries. I am starting to look like a hipster. Filthy, dirty hipster. AceModerator 20:44, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

In regards to you hacking the server
In regards to you hacking the server i just want you to know that sometime in the near future i am implementing operation Flying Pigs in a Blanket which will mean the end of your hacking of our server on the internet. Tmtoulouse (talk) 06:54, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, me and everyone I know are soon launching Operation Mind Fuck (which is Operation Shoving an Oily Penis in your Ear but with a better name). We have nearly finished a 9000 page booklet entitled "Question RW!". 2012 is going to be a difficult year for RWians and your boat doesn't look too seaworthy :) AceModerator 07:01, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Ole Ole Ole! Crundy Talk nerdy to me 09:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Fuck you scumbag
23:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

00:40, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Enjoy your smokes at $5 a cigarette
This kind of stuff really annoys me. I haven't smoked for 3 years, but it is totally ridiculous, both morally and policy-wise to even consider a proposal like this. Haven't they ever seen BoardWalk Empire? --DamoHi 06:35, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I only smoke about a pack every 2 - 3 weeks so I am not much of a smoker anymore but yeah, that is pretty ridiculous. They had a guy from ASH on the news this morning and he was asked "Are you not taking away peoples personal choice to smoke?" and he used some pretty interesting wordplay to defend himself. He claimed his organisation was in fact giving people morepersonal choice in the in breaking an addiction he was giving people greater personal choice to quit or keep smoke. Anyways, I have been watching Boardwalk Empire on Sunday nights. Great show. AceModerator 07:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Bunch of drongos if you ask me. The pain is felt hardest by the people who haven't had a pay rise in 4 years, despite a massive rise in the cost of living.  The Maori Party are a bunch of snivelling intellectuals who can't see the wood for the trees.  --DamoHi 07:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I sent you an email. AceModerator 08:00, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Definitely not something from nothing
For you. sterileevolutionist story telling 14:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh it's all bullshit special pleading from that scumbag and the CMI stooges. Philip continues contending that virtual particles popping into existence from the quantum vacuum doesn't answer the question of what happened before the big bang, which is true enough. He jumps to the empirically unsupportable conclusion that his god, which is outside of time, did it. Honest people say "I don't know" and that all we do know is that in the microseconds after the Planck time, which is as far back as the progression of time even makes sense, we've got a perfectly adequate explanation of a something that existed from the only beginning we know. All he can point to in order to cast doubt on the scientific consensus as part of the creationist program of negative apologetics, is articles discussing the something from nothing issue colloquially. As usual, he's perfectly willing to reject what the informed scientific consensus is in order to deceptively create the perception that things are as he claims. At the end of the day, his special pleading around the timelessness of his god is akin to any number of so-called "first cause" arguments for the existence of a god that (a) ground out in vicious circularity and (b) even if they didn't wouldn't point to the existence of his god but only to the existence of some entity that possesses the character of "timelessness." It may also boil down to a kind of god of the gaps argument in which that moment before the "evolutionists" can provide any meaningful explanation is the space where his special god lives. Because he says so. And when he invokes this "worldview" shit it's all based on the inconsistent lie that he's just considering the evidence through the lens of his faith and that science itself (a) is based on Christian principles without which it wouldn't makes sense (nobody ever bothers substantiating this ludicrous claim), and (b) historical events aren't susceptible of scientific inquiry since they're not repeatable, etc., yet he's got the answer because his god says so in the bible. And how does he know that his god is right? Because faith, which he again lies about being based on evidence in another sort of viciously circular problem. Oh fuck these guys. I have no idea how AWC lasted so long. [[file:Nuttysig.svg|95px|link=User:Nutty Roux|Nutty Roux]]100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 16:53, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

You baddie you
Shame on you. 15:16, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Karajou is a lying mutant. I don't know why he thinks it is me. He is either stupid, lying or both. I'd go for both. AceModerator 20:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Karajou doesn't just throw these accusations around. There is a rigorous process of speculation, investigation and masturbation. Occasionaluse (talk) 20:52, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * here is something for him to masturbate over...AceModerator 21:00, 26 April 2012 (UTC)



04:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Instant vintage
Like I'm on Instagram. Bitch. Occasionaluse (talk) 06:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Block
Shouldn't you have waited till User:Why are black girls so pretty and have such nice smiles? edited before blocking? The user stereotypes black women in a condescending way but it's not extreme racism. I would wait till the user edits, block on the first bad edit. If the user edits constructively (unlikely but possible) explain why racial stereotyping is wrong. Proxima Centauri (talk) 06:25, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, im so sure that user planned to be constructive. -- il' Dictator   Mikal  06:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Pretty sure we've seen this troll before... Peter is procrastinating. 06:47, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Three things PC, 1) We have had accounts with similar usernames that do nothing but troll/spam 2) Racial/homophobic/sexist usernames are discouraged 3) No. AceModerator 07:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC) Edited by Proxima Centauri (talk) to show what Ace really means
 * If there is as pattern of trolling by users with similar names that's slightly different. In general terms a username like that from someone inexperienced with the wiki can indicate naivity rather than extreme racism, such users can sometimes see their mistake if things are explained instead of just blocking them. Proxima Centauri (talk) 07:23, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * A fourth thing 4)No. AceModerator 07:51, 7 May 2012 (UTC) Edited by Proxima Centauri (talk) to show what Ace really means
 * Damn. I never thought Karajou had the balls to sire offspring, but I was wrong. AceMcWicked takes after his daddy, Karajou in every obnoxious detail. nobsCorporations are people, too. 11:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * sure thing Rob. AceModerator 21:17, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Aren't you a little old to be following someone around post-argument, looking for trouble? Keep your fit-throwing at Ace to one page, will you?±[[File:knightoftldrsig.png]]KnightOfTL;DR longissimus non legeri 12:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Anyone else notice Ace going down a rabbit hole of sorts over the past few months? You on/off meds, Ace? Anything significant change in your life? Occasionaluse (talk) 21:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No meds, no changes but thanks for your concern. AceModerator 21:45, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Profligate drunkenness and surliness is the hallmark of RW's New Culture. Get used to it. This is not your circle jerk anymore. Virgin aspie fascists who get off on wiki-power and live in their parents' basements need not apply. [[file:Nuttysig.svg|95px|link=User:Nutty Roux|Nutty Roux]]100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 11:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Jesus fuck
life in New Zealand has got to be pretty fucking dull, if this is the shit you have to resort to to amuse yourself. nobsCorporations are people, too. 05:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Some of us troll you to amuse themselves...others have their own 'interests'. AceModerator 07:08, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * That seems like a pretty damn good thing to be interested in, Ace. 07:17, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Of course, I like the ladies. I was more thinking about Rob masturbating to lovely Kara while also searching through commie atrocity pics. AceModerator 07:25, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The remarkable part is how bland Rob's taste in porn is. Of all the porn across the internet, Rob masturbates to a woman in rainbow socks and yellow lingerie.  08:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, but given that it's Rob, are any of us really surprised? I mean, seriously! 08:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah but it's the girl next door, young baby-sitter fantasy for Rob. The naive and innocent. AceModerator 09:00, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I find myself more creeped out than enlightened by this. ±[[File:knightoftldrsig.png]]KnightOfTL;DR longissimus non legeri 09:32, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * That's your interpretation, Ace. Interesting that you should go there-- 10:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Fuck ya Ace, I told you six months ago what happened when and you trolled me there. Let me be unequivocal about this. I did not have sex with that woman, Ms. Duhe, I never told anybody to lie, and I did not masturbate in the oval office bathroom near the sink. nobsCorporations are people, too. 11:07, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh of course Brxbrx added a lot to the discussion. I'm certain Ace is the only person in the history of the internet to describe Kara Duhe like that. Back in the real world, she really is pretty boring. If you're going to jerk off to porn, at least treat yourself to something filthy enough that getting caught with it might actually be embarrassing. Pst. There's a reason Rob doesn't give enough of a shit about all this ribbing over Kara Duhe to advance more than the unlikely claim that a "cholo" would be interested in Kara Duhe. Anal is the new second base in practically any internet porn. Ron Harris pics are like Highlights for Children. [[file:Nuttysig.svg|95px|link=User:Nutty Roux|Nutty Roux]]100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 11:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)