User talk:HighlandP

Welcome aboard! Clyde Winters The Tribal Chieftan Of the Black Celts from the Battle of Teutoburg Forest (talk) 10:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

I suggest you don't ever do that again
Just a warning. User:Kosterortiizbrock (talk) 12:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * So the truth is banned here is it? That's not very rational HighlandP (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Any legitimate concerns, or are you just going to remove massive amounts of text without any discussion whatsoever and then whine? Kosterortiizbrock (still thinking of a new sig) (talk) 12:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Stop with these attempts to censor the Scientology, Xenudamnit!--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ 12:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * But I thought this was supposed to be RationalWiki. Kosterortiizbrock (still thinking of a new sig) (talk) 12:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Why do you class scientology as a cult when it is clearly not. Organizations such as the Cult Awareness Network don't. And the US government clearly wouldn't have given it Tax Exempt status as a religion is it where a cult. Please stop spreading such lies. HighlandP (talk) 12:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * CAN doesn't list them as a cult cause Scientology fucking RUNS CAN and no, being granted this tax exemption from the gov't ain't no exemption from being a Xenudamned cult!--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ 12:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * (EC) The Cult Awareness Network is owned by the Church of Scientology. They bought up the domain after the original site was sued into oblivion. The original site also (rightly) classed Scientology as a cult. Tax Exempt status is a very poor way to try to gauge legitimacy for a religion. After all, by that logic, no religion would be legitimate at its inception, would it? Queexchthonic murmurings 12:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * In addition, none of these have anything to do with the definition or common perception of a cult. Kosterortiizbrock (proud feminist) (talk) 12:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)