Talk:Kary Mullis

"Bad Laypit?"
I don't mean to go edit warring, but I'd like a closer explanation of why this article isn't allowed formatting that looks good and seems to fit closer to formatting in other articles? (i.e. ) Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * You're using a bullet list instead of the wiki-syntax for lists of words and their explanations.--Arisboch (talk) 15:53, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, though the bullet lists looks better and handles better, and it does appear in other articles in a similar fashion? (i.e. ). I'm not going to force a bullet list onto this article, though (naturally - I'm nice). Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It should, I don't think, that a bullet list is supposed to be used that way (and doesn't look better, but that's just subjective).--Arisboch (talk) 16:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I find, subjectively, that the bullet list reads a lot better, looks better (with the little blue ball instead of massive fat text) and is easier to edit, too. I've also seen it about ten times as often as the list you keep trying to add. Now, that's not an argument for anything. But I'm just saying, consider the bullet point list? It's not really a big deal but I just think it's better and atleast I've sourced other articles with bullet points in this discussion. *shrugs* Reverend Black Percy (talk) 16:03, 7 July 2015 (UTC)