User talk:Psygremlin/FBTB

Suggestion
This page is very interesting. For example, I didn't know about JPatt's edits. Anyway: I'd move this page to User:Psygremlin/FBTB, so to have a Talk page at User talk:Psygremlin/FBTB. Unless you want this page to keep a low profile, of course. Editor at CPLiar at RP! 05:02, 22 September 2008 (EDT)


 * You are right, of course... dunno why I started it here. I blame teh stoopid. --PsyGremlinWhut? 05:26, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Why do I always get all the blame?!? Editor at CPLiar at RP! 05:28, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * lol - you were closest at the time. --PsyGremlinWhut? 05:38, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Bot?
Out of curiosity, do you track this manually or do you use a bot? 02:29, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Manually at the moment - just take each day's new user and block logs and fiddle around in Excel to get the info. Alas, I wouldn't have a clue how to put a bot together. --PsyGremlinWhut? 12:15, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Shame about that, nice page though. Very interesting, I assume that even if you removed the info regarding the bot attack you'd still have an obscenely high number of 5 year blocks (imagine Andy in 5 years time when they all come back...) and stuff. Although it still doesn't necessarily separate parodists from genuine users, both conservative and liberal, who have just been shafted.  A rmondiko V  User_Talk:Armondikov 08:20, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm wondering if it's worth keeping up with this - was trying to track if there are any new contributors joining or not. So far there's 160 who haven't been blocked yet, so I should check their contribs. However, a simple glance at recent changes seems to show the same old names popping up. There's hardly a new person contributing for long. --PsyGremlinWhut? 04:38, 14 October 2008 (EDT)