User talk:Alex.smith.tokyo

Timothy Mousseau article
You were reverted by a moderator. Please argue your changes on the talk page or else your work will certainly be wasted.Ariel31459 (talk) 15:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi there! I appreciate many things about rationalwicki but this page about Tim Mousseau was clearly written by a pro-nuclear advocate and is highly biased, bordering on libelous in tone and content. Hence the repeated attempts to give it a more balanced presentation. Also, whoever the original author is, he/she repeatedly attempts to taint Mousseau's reputation through association with Anders Moller who was cleared of all dishonesty claims by his employer, the CNRS. Thus the implied linkages are libelous in that they assume that Moller is guilty (when he was not), and that Mousseau is guilty through association.
 * Hi there! I appreciate many things about rationalwicki but this page about Tim Mousseau was clearly written by a pro-nuclear advocate and is highly biased, bordering on libelous in tone and content. Hence the repeated attempts to give it a more balanced presentation. Also, whoever the original author is, he/she repeatedly attempts to taint Mousseau's reputation through association with Anders Moller who was cleared of all dishonesty claims by his employer, the CNRS. Thus the implied linkages are libelous in that they assume that Moller is guilty (when he was not), and that Mousseau is guilty through association.


 * I have tried to provide supporting links for the key claims that Mousseau has made with respect to radiation effects in Chernobyl and Fukushima as well as links to recent papers by former competitors who have provided validation to key elements of Mousseau's findings.


 * Please let me know if there is a better way to handle this!


 * Thanks


 * Alex Smith
 * 23:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I can't drink, I'm out of beverages. Comrade GC (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 00:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, you guys aren't much help! And locking this page is not playing fair!
 * You did revert an edit twice. 02:49, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * You did revert an edit twice. 02:49, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Signature
On talk pages, please sign your name after your posts by typing ~. Thank you! Nerd (talk) 03:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually it's: 03:22, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Nice template! Nerd (talk) 03:25, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Advice
You seem to be a good faith editor. If your changes get reverted, please don't repeatedly revert them back because all that will happen is someone will lock the page. Instead, write a comment on the article's talk page explaining the specific problems with the article and how it should be improved. CowHouse (talk) 05:46, 7 January 2018 (UTC)