User talk:Neveruse/Archive2

Sysopship
I am sorry to inform you that you are now a sysop. An informatory pamphlet can be found here. 14:54, 2 February 2009 (EST)
 * What should I do? Antibiotics? Neveruse513 14:59, 2 February 2009 (EST)
 * Putting something on your userpage might help. 16:06, 2 February 2009 (EST)

Old boat poop
I moved your template to template:global flood over an earlier failed version. We usually use "xxxxnav" for the boxes that link to every article, at the bottom of a page. Anyway, feel free to deploy it and reduce the "see also"s if you think it makes sense. If what you really wanted was a navbox at the bottom that listed every article, feel free to use your previous template name and assemble it.  ħ uman  00:36, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 * Works for me, thanks. Neveruse513 01:06, 3 February 2009 (EST)

Deleting my own WIGO
You reverted my deletion. Am I not allowed to delete my own WIGO? I just don't want to have to see the score keep going down. It's at -11 right now. - Cuckoo 17:08, 18 February 2009 (EST)


 * From the WIGO page: "Do not remove items from the list unless you believe they are legally slanderous or otherwise likely to be 'detrimental to RationalWiki'. Comment out an item if you think it's really an issue. If you think an item is not worthwhile, just vote it down - 'one man's boredom is another man's lulz'."


 * There's nothing about an exception for deleting your own WIGO. Heck, I've had WIGO scores much lower. No one in their right mind is going to track it back to you and removing it is almost like censoring dissent. I know, it sucks and honestly, I don't really give a shit. So if you remove it again, I'm not going to war with you, but I don't think it should be removed (and I think that is the consensus). Neveruse513 17:19, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Well, when I posted a duplicate item by accident recently, someone else deleted it. So I figured that the rules weren't quite so firm. - Cuckoo 22:13, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * No one should delete them because it upsets the poll numbers. - User   22:15, 18 February 2009 (EST)
 * The rules are rigid because it totally screws up the polling. If you must "make it go away" just comment it out, as it says in the owner's manual.  ħ uman  22:26, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Social behavior
If you aren't making crude jokes, and it is merely illustrating social behavior, thumbs up. --"C, U Rthe,. 17:13, 3 March 2009 (EST)
 * Cats grooming each other is indeed a social behaviour. Neveruse513 17:15, 3 March 2009 (EST)

Seriously
I mean it. Not worked up at all. I just took your "definition is shit" as an invitation for a bit of piss-taking. Besides, I've just had a marvellous meal with the family and a bottle of Minervois, so nothing is bad! Actually, looking at my posts, the "twat" bit was probably a bit OTT. Striken. Have a good weekend. Ajkgordon 17:47, 6 March 2009 (EST)
 * An invitation is a pretty accurate description. Likewise on the weekend. Neveruse513 18:00, 6 March 2009 (EST)

the title
No your line was "Have a cigar". Mei 16:04, 18 March 2009 (EDT)


 * Mei: 1 Neveruse513 16:07, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Funny I make that 3. Mei 16:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
 * If that makes three, you're a dick. Are you a dick? Neveruse513 16:26, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
 * haha, i've still to this day never seen anyone who could admit that makes three. Keep on going, Neveruse...you're totally rashunal. Mei 16:31, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Fuck, is that four? Neveruse513 16:32, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Don't worry the Pink Floyd bonus round is next. Mei 16:39, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
 * And how is that not supposed to worry me? Neveruse513 16:41, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Don't let us get off on the wrong foot. Jorge 03:20, 19 March 2009 (EDT)

Bible guide
The "bible guide" project had started days before I got here, a year or so ago, and it was a natural fit (I have this useless ABD in Religious Studies)... but some how those last few books are so hard to finish. mostly cause... well, they are like 1 page long and don't say anything. I tried to just delete them, but Human said "stop that cheating." Heh.-- 14:19, 24 March 2009 (EDT)

SES application
I don't think we should publish Addison's name (or any of the homeschooler's names, if they're in there) and I don't think he can give us permission to do so. It's of questionable legality, I think, since he is a minor. IANAL, of course, but on the other hand I think it's also of questionable taste too. --Arcan  ¡ollǝɥ  18:50, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I would suggest teh copy we eventually host on RW have (perhaps) all names redacted. I hope ones that travel via private channels have no redactions beyond what the State of New Jersey thinks appropriate. Hint hint.  ħ uman  21:15, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I'm a lawyer, but I'm not giving you legal advice when I say that anything you obtain from a FOIA request is fair game for publication. Don't be pussies.  Nutty Roux 21:19, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
 * It's not a matter of being pussies. If it's legal, fine, I was wrong.  I still don't think it's right to include the kids' names.  They already have Andy for a teacher; haven't they suffered enough?  --Arcan   ¡ollǝɥ  22:27, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I concur with Arcan--we try not to pick on their homework assignments--outing minors on a wiki that's less than "family-friendly" seems a little problematic to me...TheoryOfPractice 22:33, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I'd like to do this in best possible taste. It's only first names (sometimes with last initial) next to a few endorsements. I asked Addison and he said it was no concern of his. This being a public record, anything that should be redacted would have been redacted in the copy delivered to me.


 * That said, I have no problem redacting the first names of students/parents. Neveruse513 12:34, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
 * If it was a matter of privacy, thestate would have expunged the names from the record. Anyone who really wanted to could find out the names.  Print them.  User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 12:37, 4 April 2009 (EDT)

Children deserve better than to have a bunch of assholes like ourselves use them as the butt of our jokes and in our silly wiki wars. TheoryOfPractice 12:42, 4 April 2009 (EDT)


 * (EC)I'm still messing around with teh scanning. XSANE apparently only supports 600 dpi and it's looking a little rough so I might have to take it to a windoze bawx to get a nice 1200. I'm fine with delivering copies with no further redactions to interested parties. If the consensus is to further redact them before public posting, that's fine too. Its a bit of a toss up for me. Neveruse513 12:40, 4 April 2009 (EDT)

I misunderstood. There ' s nothing wrong with trying to protect children where appropriate, and I think it's appropriate to leave Andy ' s unfortunate students out of things as much as possible. This site is bad enough. I was calling you pussies for wanting to redact Addison 's name. I don't think the name of any adult identified in the application should be redacted. Nutty Roux 12:45, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Send me 600 dpi scans in whatever format you want and I will turn them into PDF's, OCR, and redact childrens' names. Nutty Roux 12:47, 4 April 2009 (EDT)

Uncle Ed here would like to have a copy with the kid's names unredacted. User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 12:53, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
 * So in other words, does Andy tolerate Ed in the same way that, say, the Catholic church tolerates its priests? Nutty Roux 12:57, 4 April 2009 (EDT)

Neveruse - I just realized I have Acrobat Pro on my Macbook and it's making some really nice OCRs of the large format images. I'll tweak and tweak until this comes up. I guess the goal is to have relatively true to format text of the application so people can search terms after it's posted on the wiki? Nutty Roux 20:34, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Yes, that would be ideal. Also, text loads quicker than an image of text.  And can be copy/pasted, etc.  ħ uman  22:27, 6 April 2009 (EDT)
 * The resized versions OCR poorly. I realize it's a pain in the butt, but can you email me the large png's? set up email on your user page so I can send you a very important message.  Nutty Roux 17:50, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
 * RE names. We don't KNOW that the quotes are from minors. They are just names in the document and could be 16 or 17. So we should either redact all names or none. I was going to volunteer to OCR some pages myself using Acrobat Pro but it looks like you guys have now got it in hand. Генгис    18:09, 7 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I actually did a few of the earlier pages with Acrobat Pro and they come out pretty crummy regardless of the quality of the start image. For the amount of time it would take me to doctor them, I may as well just type it all up, as I think someone else is doing.  Is there a central place where we're discussing this worthy project?  Nutty Roux 18:45, 7 April 2009 (EDT)

Can we file replies to Andy's SES application?
Do you know? SO much of this stuff is a blatant, shocking lie!-Diadochus 15:14, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I'm not sure...might be worth looking into. I think the chance of Andy's app being approved are reeaaally low. <font color=#CC2200>Neveruse513 15:23, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Really? See, I know he's crazy, you know he's crazy, anyone who spent time looking into him would think he's crazy, but his application does a good job of doing what Scrubs calls "hiding the crazy." At least what I've seen so far. Note he never mentions the boy/girl divide.-Diadochus 15:25, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Can't polish a turd. Nutty Roux 15:27, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Actually, you can. I saw the Mythbusters use a Japanese technique to polish it to near-reflective state. -- 15:42, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Oh, I don't know. I think anyone who gets caught citing op ed articles in a daily newspaper as academic research is going to get filed in circular file before you can say "underachiever." -- 15:32, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Yes you can. 15:39, 4 April 2009 (EDT)

SES small versions
If you used JPEG instead of PNG for the versions not meant to be scanned, you could get legible versions that only weighed in at a couple of hundred K max. -- 16:16, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Yeah, about 100-200k. I've converted them, but I've run out of time to upload them. I'll get them up tomorrow. <font color=#CC2200>Neveruse513 16:26, 4 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Actually 2-colour gifs would be even smaller. <font color=Blue>Генгис    18:04, 7 April 2009 (EDT)

How many pages...
are in that application?! 12:28, 5 April 2009 (EDT)
 * 41 <font color=#CC2200>Neveruse513 12:29, 5 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Thank you. 12:54, 5 April 2009 (EDT)
 * $%*@!)(!)@($#%*^ REDACTED in the title! >_< 13:07, 5 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Meh, I thought it was a tad snarky. What, it screw ur scriptz? <font color=#CC2200>Neveruse513 20:20, 5 April 2009 (EDT)

Future use?
Template:Clade 17:43, 6 April 2009 (EDT)
 * Sweet! Thanks. <font color=#CC2200>Neveruse513 19:00, 6 April 2009 (EDT)

Creationists hypotheses at ASK
This is what I had in mind. Sterilewalkie-talkie 20:23, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
 * I like. <font color=#CC2200>Neveruse513 11:36, 9 April 2009 (EDT)

Lurkin'
There's hundreds of us out there. 10:57, 16 April 2009 (EDT)

huh?
Aren't you still blocked? Mei 04:48, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I sat there and pressed the button until it worked. I was hoping this would strike fear into your heart but now I'm second guessing myself. 04:58, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Mei is enfeared with regards to her heart. "I sat there and pressed the button until it worked." = genius! Mei 05:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Er ...
Thanks ... I think ... ? 20:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It's more of a tool for division, but I would take it as a compliment. 20:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh fine, see if i care that you neither like nor dislike me. I live for invisibility.  :P-- 21:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It's that kind of moxie that's going to get you on the list. 21:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

List
Where do I come on it? 21:21, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You're difficult to classify. Initially, I didn't like you (don't know why). I'm going to have to think about it and review our interactions and your contributions. 21:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Surely you like Ace. Ace is everyones friend, a man on the move. Friend to all's gods creatures. Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 21:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

List
BUT I LIKE YOU ;_________; User:Mei
 * Aww... I'll reconsider. 15:43, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I got you a thank you hug. And some FRIES> User:Mei
 * Mei should appear on a different list called 'people who are Mei'. User:Mei
 * "mei parodoxically liked and disliked" = win! User:Mei

I suppose I'm honored to be mentioned at all. Really, I am trying to clean up my act since I waste so much time here anyhow. <font color="Red">Jorge  19:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Signature
Sign your damned comments, blast your eyes! EddyP 20:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I prefer others to clean up my mess. &mdash; Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs 20:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Occassional insolence
Damn your blasted eyes to hell, you insolent swine, sah! EddyP 20:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Do your worst, you filthy commie UnAmerican scum! Blast your damned eyes to hell! EddyP 20:17, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

You like CUR
Weird, very weird. -- 20:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The little rapscallion keeps it interesting. Even if he is a very bad little boy who desperately needs to get outside. &mdash; Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs 20:48, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * And now I'm pissed. Which you wanted, of course... -- 20:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Get amusing or you can stew on the bottom half. You're choice. &mdash; Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs 21:03, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * How do I get amusing? -- 21:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Usually by causing trouble. &mdash; Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs 21:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

You're/your
Quick orientation
 * Your car is running.
 * You're running out to your car to turn it off
 * "You're" is used in place of "you are"

Hope that explains it. 22:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC
 * There not going to fix they're grammar the way you explained it their. <font color="Maroon" face=Palatino>Jorge  23:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you have a source? &mdash; Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs 02:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

What about me?
06:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

What about me?
07:04, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Yay!
I made the happy list! High fives all around! --Kels 13:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, but surely there should be some explanation of why on the "like" list. I mean, it could be anything. It could be that that list is all "U.I.L.F."s. 16:05, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

ONOZ!!!
You don't like me... ouch. ) :   21:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * yep...you'd better change you're ways. do less...slack off more...maybe even wandalize something. I know it's against you're nature, but it's worth being up their on the list. &mdash; Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs 22:13, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Adding a under Users I don't like would be very lulzy. 00:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

FUNNY
NOT!! 21:26, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations
You win. I'm outta here. Good-bye. CЯacke ® 20:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

?
Ypu piss cracker off, then you have a go at rpeh. What's going on? Totnesmartin 14:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't fathom that cracker would be offended. The go at Rpeh is obviously what it is...isn't it? &mdash; Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs 14:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's obviously you attempting to big yourself up to someone with about 12 edits, none of which are damaging or otherwise wrong at all. 14:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * God I love the internet...I can't tell if your fucking with me! Either way, please cite the part of the message to Rpeh which you could possibly think was serious. &mdash; Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs 14:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's easily done. You have to remember that you're just text and not everyone has that as their first language. If you were trying to be funny you could have left off the "Fuck off" at the end or are you just trying to do a Nutty "Get Fucked" Roux? 14:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The bit that goes "I'm sick of n00bs like Rpeh coming around and taking more than they're fare shake. Rpeh, I've been monitoring your contributions and I feel my suspicions will be confirmed next time larron does his analyses: you're taking more fun from the community than your giving back. Fuck off." Totnesmartin 14:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh you fucking prick, lighten up. &mdash; Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs 14:51, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * To be fair, I did realise it was meant to be a joke even if I did't think it was particularly funny. Rpeh 14:52, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad to see we won't run the risk of this happening. 14:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you noticed, Rpeh. It was meant more to be funny to me than to you. I just like seeing how ridiculous I can make things and still have pretentious wiki-twats scold me for it because they think I'm serious. If if would have used "sheik" instead of "shake" would you pricks still think I was serious? Just trying to test the limits... &mdash; Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs 14:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

(unindent) Claiming that you're just out to "test the limits" and piss off the "pricks" and "wiki-twats" is no excuse for being an arsewipe with what you are saying. Stop claiming victory and palming off the bad behaviour onto the users who have actually acted reasonably. 15:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Tell me, which one got you:


 * 1) Fun is quantifiable;
 * 2) Fun is in limited quantity;
 * 3) I'm monitoring Rpeh's contributions;
 * 4) Rpeh is taking more fun than he's giving back;
 * 5) LArron's graphs can prove #4;
 * 6) I freely confuse homonyms, even when I'm using the same word in the same sentence; &mdash; Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs 15:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * So I'm now on the list of editors that you don't like just for telling you to be careful when you tell people to "fuck off". I feel honoured and validated at last. 15:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You still don't get it, do you? &mdash; Unsigned, by: Neveruse513 / talk / contribs 15:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Ah, sorry...
I just farted in your userspace. Sorry. 16:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I fart in your userspace and you like me?! Wicked. 16:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm Honoured!
I like you too :) Rpeh 12:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Your list
You can join Rpeh in growing the fuck up too. 13:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * And why am I in bold? EddyP 14:00, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

PUT ME ON THE DAMN LIST ALREADY!!!
14:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

I added everyone to the list! Yay! 14:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I disabled that trick with π's script, so it doesn't work on me. 16:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Obvious Reasons?
Apparently not so much. What are the obvious reasons for, allegedly, not liking me? Just curious.The Goonie 1 23:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * id - For obvious reasons returns " id  - For obvious reasons".  Which is fun for those of us already on either list once...  23:44, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough.The Goonie 1 23:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's freaked a lot of people out in various uses... 23:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Whats all this about? Why is my name being banded about like a cheap tart? Ace McWickedi9 23:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC) p.s. nevermind. Ace McWickedi9 23:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * They're just jealous because I have THE touch and they don't....The Goonie 1 00:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

The 31 second block
I understand it was in the interests of humour, but how do you think RobS will react after he was blocked for being a sysop? I mean, come on, you're a sysop and you remain unblocked. How do you think RobS will feel? MarcusCicero (talk) 20:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I predict that he will react in one of two ways:
 * Wait out the whole 31 seconds
 * Unblock himself


 * As for how he will feel...was that a rhetorical question? &mdash; Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * As I recall, when TK got a relatively short block he bitched about it violating his fundamental human rights. I only wish I was kidding. --Kels (talk) 20:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The first task for any sysop should be to unblock themself, it's an initation rite. I don't know what Neveruse was doing by applying only a 31 second block. 20:26, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm glad someone else caught that...I don't know what I was thinking. Finally the time comes and I choke. &mdash; Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Why did you block me? That hurt, I mean, I thought we were friends. MarcusCicero (talk) 20:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * +1 MarcusCicero &mdash; Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:25, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

0 + 1 = 1, 1 (0) = 0. MarcusCicero (talk) 20:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1/0 = MarcusCicero &mdash; Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, I'll get to grips with a couple of things. In fact, I'll let out my heart to you.

Right now, the urge to troll and continue this charade is overwhelming. What I really want to do is purge some of RWs articles of its insanity and use bombastic polemic in the process. However, I dislike being universally despised. So I thought the whole 'squeaky clean' image might get me somewhere, but it just appears ingenuine.

My problem is that I would like to rewind to the way things were 4 or 5 days ago, but now that would be impossible. Were I to use strong language I would not be taken seriously and immediately regarded as a troll - even for things like the Ann Coulter charade where I was deadly serious. Whatever happens, RW has removed a potent threat to its ego and replaced it with cuddly and irrelevant accusations of 'trolling' instead. MarcusCicero (talk) 20:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Amazing how much you resemble CUR/Arthur when you do stuff like this. He refused to just drop the attention-seeking, roll up his sleeves and just get on with things too.  If you did, everyone would forget about the trolling, the fake mental illness and whatever else within days. --Kels (talk) 20:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * (EC) I'm a big fan of trolling. Seriously. As far as Coulter goes, she's arguably a revisionist. You may prefer to call her revisions "historical inaccuracies". &mdash; Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I swear this is getting more bizarre by the minute... 21:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * NU, please excuse the intrusion. MC, you might or might not know by now that many of "us" disagree endlessly and over many things.  But the way we resolve our differences is not (usually) through "bombastic polemic" - we state our case and others chime in.  I'd recommend the same course of action if you care about the content of our articles.  If you just want to be a thorn/prick in our side, to be the "too cool to join" and refer to us in the second person, and engage in "bombastic polemic"s, well, yeah, you're gonna get pissed on.   04:32, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your support
For me and SuperJosh for 'crats. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear that it will ever happen, but I don't mind. Being a sysop is fun enough. Anyways, cheers.The Goonie 1 (talk) 21:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, appreciated. 19:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Saddle up your dinosaur
You said on TWIGO that you rode Ham's fiberglass dinosaur. Were you there with PZ? Corry (talk) 04:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No, it was a while back, closer to when it opened. I didn't hear about PZ until the morning of, or I probably would have made the trip. &mdash; Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 13:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

What about don't feed the troll...
... was unclear? Policy is now to simply ignore whatever MC says. We will not dignify ourselves to a response. --
 * And just what the fuck do you think you're doing? Buying me a new irony meter, I hope. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 (Dictated But Not Read) / Talk / Block 01:04, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Come back soon
That's... disappointing. I always liked reading your stuff. –SuspectedReplicantretire me 19:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I suppose now I get it, I should say that I'm glad you're gone and your material was clearly in violation of 90/10? Or something? Seriously, it's good that you're going. The site will be a lot better without you. –SuspectedReplicantretire me 20:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Wassa matter honey?
Why so angry? Why so leaving? Ace McWickedModel 500 21:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * (EC)I appreciate your concern, Ace. I really do. But my reasons for leaving are immaterial as the ball has already been set in motion and I am not looking back. I hope that you will take a certain honour in being the subject of my last ever post on RW. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 (Dictated But Not Read) / Talk / Block 21:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That sucks dude, I liked you. Well, we'll always be here if you want to come back. Ace McWickedModel 500 22:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Eh? More "leaving and never coming back?" Ah well. 22:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Don't leave, man
Here, I was just about to nominate you for bureaucrat. I've always enjoyed listening to what you had to say about stuff. And, I always liked your userpage with all the people here you liked and disliked. Oh well. Good luck with whatever you move onto. 21:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, GP (and Rpeh, too). &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 (Dictated But Not Read) / Talk / Block 21:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Cheers, man. And good luck again. 22:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Was this because we all sucked up to RobS over that anti-Catholic bigotry thing? 00:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Well then, fuck you Neveruse, you fucking fuck! Nah, I'm just kidding, we have fun... see ya around! 00:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't go! Crundy still loves you! 14:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You should call us a cliché as well. 23:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Chicago
Because this topic is not on enough talk pages yet, and Nutty is, for some reason, not picking a location; What type of establishment would we all like to meet at on the 16th? I naturally assume a bar or similar, but if anyone has some particular type of preferance, let it be know (or which part of the city). Lacking clear preferences, I will grudingly make a selection for meeting, of which everyone can then complain about. 16:15, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * A bar or something similar is preferred. I need to make double sure I can be there. I might be closing on a house that weekend. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 14:10, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * And what better way to celebrate than having a drink with some great people? I'll look for bars either downtown or on the near north side were Trent will be.  I'll find a good place sometime this week.   15:04, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Well then....
you can just fuck off then young lad!. :-)  AceMcWicked 20:38, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Schlafly Beer
We don't get that kind of stuff out East (at least in PA I've never seen it) without bootleggin'. Is it really good stuff? Perhaps a beer swap can be arranged? I'll send you some Erie Brewing Company Railbender Ale. 21:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It was certainly the best pumpkin ale I've ever had. Great beer to start the night off with. I'm not sure if I can get it here, but I'm due to take a trip to the party store and I'll check. I'm not sure if I can get Railbender or not...what I really need is more Yuengling. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 21:31, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You can get it out Opal's Lounge.....OpalHonors 21:33, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, Yuengling. 'Tis a common beer in these parts.  I work at a metals recycling plant, and Yuengling is always sending us kegs, unfortunately empty, to recycle.  However, you can always bet there will be a 24 pack of (full) bottles on the truck for us to enjoy at after work.   21:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Now thats a way to relax.... I get to spend the next three hours in a Macroeconomics class.... from 6-9pm... What was I thinking!???!??!?!?!!?!?!OpalHonors 21:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Eww, Macroecon. The only late class I ever took is an Analytical Chemistry 2 course from 6:00 to 8:30, one night a week.  I had to take a 45 minute bus ride to get there, too.  Pew!   21:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You don't quite understand... I have ADHD, and my meds wear off halfway through the class, so not only am I bored and having trouble concentrating, I also am starving!!!!OpalHonors 21:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

ARE YOU STILL HERE?!
HAVEN'T YOU FUCKED OFF YET?!?!?! 18:06, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * If you intend to continue editing the Wiki, you should remove the "Retired" template from your user-page. 18:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It is my intention to leave and never come back that warrants the template. It is my compulsion to edit that is unintended. The template stays. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:42, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * If you wish help with overcoming that compulsion, one of the bureaucrats can de-sysop and permaban you. 20:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Gee, I'm sure you'd be obliged. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 21:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I dislike banhammers. Go ask another bureaucrat. 21:13, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll take the suggestion into consideration. Thanks. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 21:20, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I could be of assistance. AceMcWicked 21:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Ace, you should know better... &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 21:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah but I am forgetful. AceMcWicked 21:27, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't blame you. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 21:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't block you anyway. AceMcWicked 21:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Likewise, buddy. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 21:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * What smells bad here? Oh.... I see.  03:46, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * That's right Huw-man, the Joshmeister was here. 03:48, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Renamed
What was 513 anyway? -- Nx  / talk 21:15, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Birthday / area code / address / a parody of the random numbers people put on the end of their names. The usual. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 21:18, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Support your local Mei
Good evening citizen. You have been selected for showing interest in your local Mei. Were you aware that you can show your support for the troops the Mei by sporting this userbox on your userpage? It's very pretty. This Christmas Mei will go hungry. Please help feed a hungry Mei today. ''' Play, run, feed and feel good about yourself. tm''' This message brought to you by Mei. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  00:43, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I am Brown 25
I am center-right, but there is a tolerance point of shenannigans I can tolerate. ConservapediaEditor 18:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Protection
Which part of talk page is not you property do you not understand? -- Nx  / talk 20:18, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Might I add that it says so in our community guidlines right here. Jfaartz (talk) 20:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That technically does not apply to the User talk page, just the user page itself. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Even the part that says that user talk pages are community property? Learn to read. 20:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * (EC) Which part of that translates into me not being allowed to protect it? Just because it is not my property does not mean I cannot protect it. Show me something in the CS that states I may not protect it. I suppose you can just keep unprotecting it, and that may be your right (although it's clear your human emotions have affected your judgment). I suppose I could also LEAVE AND NEVER COME BACK. Is that what you want? I bet you'd like that, wouldn't you, you laconic little fuck. Because I will. I'll do it. I'll walk out that door and never look back. Then you can have your protected User_talk:Neveruse page and you can take it to the bank and smoke it for all I care. But until then, I will protect this page and pending revision to the community standards (hah!), you can't stop me. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * And we will unprotect it. It is not your property. You cannot protect it unilaterally and without discussion. Understand? 20:26, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * (EC) Aside: Who the fuck are you? &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * What or whom do you need to protect it from?  20:28, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * My reasons are my own. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Then why on earth should we care? 20:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * (EC) To troll, obviously. -- Nx  / talk 20:31, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Wait, wait, wait....am I trolling you are or are you trolling me? &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:42, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

On a completely different note altogether...
You, finally, have some kind of article about you on RationalWikWiki. 20:42, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * haha, awesome! &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Neveruse, siddown...
I wanna sing a little song that kept me going when I had troubles...

14:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know...I...I just want to be bad. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 15:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

You're, like, the anti-MarcusCicero
Or maybe you're both the same person... 18:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm a lot more than just Neveruse/MarcusCicero. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 18:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You're TK.jpg 18:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

The most recent Huw parody (picking mundane things to argue about with Nx until he takes his ball and goes home) left some people rubbed the wrong way. Much more than I expected. Not that I give a flying fuck about pissing off the SeriousWiki Cabal, but I need to give it a rest for a while in order to continue playing the game. MarcusCicero being binned is really making it hard for Neveruse, though. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 18:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

MC
Don't unbin him, please. He's there for a reason. 21:46, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * AND I'M LEAVING FOREVER FOR A REASON. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 21:53, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * BYE!!
 * AGAIN!! 21:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * What is this, the 50th time? 21:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's really losing it's luster. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 22:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe you should try to put some kind of new spin on it, to keep it original. 22:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I have a few new games in the works, so I think I can shelf this one for a while. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 22:08, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Nothing too destructive or obnoxious, I hope. 22:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * In the strictest sense, I am confident that they are not destructive to the wiki. I doubt you'll be caught in the crossfire, but I can't guarantee that you won't be annoyed. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 22:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Stand up for your principles Neveruse! From one troll to another, we can overcome these bastards! Lunacy (talk) 12:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Gretchen Carlson
I just saw that Jon Stewart segment. I really can't stand her. She thinks that we ought to ban free speech on Christmas day. --Crazyswordsman (talk) 23:46, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes!!!
Well done Neveruse! Civil disobedience is the number one priority in the international troll's rights movement. And yes you are right, there is scant evidence for the horrid allegation that me and Marcus Cicero are the same person. Lunacy (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Put up or shut up.
Now. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 21:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for saving me the trouble. As the adage goes, strike while the iron is hot. However, the lesser known corollary is to not strike while the iron is mentally unstable. I'll let you cool off a little before taking your mop. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 21:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

"It must be easy to be a peon and let the administrators worry about all the big boy stuff."
And you worry about my abusive attitude? what exactly is your problem? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 22:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Your abusive attitude aside, my primary concern is your abuses acting as an administrator. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 22:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * This isn't about that. This is about your attitude to NX. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 22:25, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * After all this time, I still can't believe you don't understand what's going on. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 22:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Enlighten me. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 22:28, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Nx is one serious mother fucker, but my statement was so ridiculous that I doubt even he took it seriously. Think about the situation... You don't see any irony in there? &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 22:30, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

"I'll let you cool off before taking your mop."
(User rights log); 09:51. . TheoryOfPractice (Talk | contribs) changed group membership for User:TheoryOfPractice from Bureaucrats and Sysops to (none). Here it is. Have fun with it. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 13:57, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * You really are embaressingly histrionic.
 * (ec) And they say I'm the drama queen... Taking your mop was something I didn't plan on doing until after implementing night mode. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 14:15, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Did you ever get those hard candies with the creme center that are wrapped up to look like a strawberry? Damn, they're nasty!  14:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * OH MY GOD HOW ARE YOU IGNORING THESE BASELESS ACCUSATIONS BY ANONYMOUS PEOPLE ON THE INTERNET? WITCH!!! &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 14:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Neveruse, I think you should pull another one of your 'Leaving and never coming back stunts'. This is too easy.
 * Uh, hello? That was so 2009. The new black is "leaving and coming back". Try some on. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 14:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * So I says to Mable I says, "If you really want the parking space..." Wait, I finish this later.  14:32, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Whoa!! 14:34, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

I don't care if you're taking a break!
Take this! Jfaartz (talk) 20:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Jfaartz, you're alright. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 03:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

So let me get this straight*
...You're a pedophile? Or you just happen to like "Yakety Sax" and Pedobear and felt compelled to add it to your userpage?

* Hah! Pun!

22:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I really don't think there's anything to explain. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 22:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkpage protection
Could you set up a seperate talkpage for those BsON and new guys to contact you? That was the condition I used to lock mine. 22:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * If I say no can we wheel war? &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 22:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh God, not this shit again. 22:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * (EC)I'd say we could wheel war tomorrow if you locked it then, since I have to get ready for band practice in a minute and won't be on here long. 22:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Deal. See you tomorrow. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 22:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Pedobear
Your video intrigues me. Explain. 20:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It intrigues me as well. It's just the pedobear doing what the pedobear does. There's not much to explain about nature. Like a moose doing moose stuff. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 21:01, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I had to add it. 21:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Yo!
Are we gonna edit war over over talkpage protection, or do I have to permaban you? 22:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, now...I was here waiting. YOU were gone. I can't tell you how that made me feel. Well, actually I can. Alone. It made me feel alone, Goonie. Like I didn't care who talked on my page. I demand an apology and I will not unprotect my page until I get it. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 17:10, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, ok. You're right.  Thanks to traffic, I was late geting home and couldn't edit war you then.  I apologize.  But you know, you can't just protect your talkpage without setting up a seperate place to talk to you.  It's against the rules here.  17:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. As a sign of good faith, I will not contest the authoritarian release of my page until you have time to war properly. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 17:16, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Your sig
Your sig still has "513" in it. I hope this is deliberate. Actually, I hope it isn't, otherwise I'll feel like a prat for writing this. Totnesmartin (talk) 20:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I know. It's not deliberate, I was just being extremely lazy. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 22:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * ;) &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 22:03, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

NEVERUSE
Do you like Mei yet or should I give you chocolate. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  17:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Wait...I have to choose? &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 17:43, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Mei > Chocolate. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 17:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Chocolate is more useful. But thank you. You can have chocolate anyway. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =   20:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

FINALLY I can use this...


I know you aren't, but fun nonetheless. How's your day going thus far? 15:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Good fun indeed. My day has been pretty good, Josh. Sneaked out for breakfast, going to go out to lunch with the old man and then pick out some tile for the kitchen. Looking forward to the weekend. How about you? &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 15:23, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool, make sure you choose a good tile for the kitchen, you don't wanna be stuck with some ugly shit for about 6 years which you don't want. My day's been OK thanks, I'm glad it's the weekend. I've been taking exams and getting results back for the last week which has been a combination of stressful and boring. But, the weekend's here and in a few hours I'm off the wagon as all students always are. 16:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

w
'[1/2x] I wear glasses'

That's gotta be a good story. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  20:00, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately not. I switch between glasses and contacts, usually every couple of months. I'm doing glasses now, looking quite distinguished. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:01, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm reading about your life

'[x] I've run away from home. [x] I've been kicked out of the house.'


 * ;______; -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  20:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Temporary problems. Everything has been fine for years. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * /hugs neveruse -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  20:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Mei :) &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I was gonna do this list myself but there are embarrassing things in there. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  20:28, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

You're funny...
I like you. (Regards to sarcastic response to my Talk WIGO:Blog entry on the Face-space dealy ma bob.) The Foxhole Atheist (talk) 16:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You know, I like you too. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 17:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Great find
Here, about Ed Poor. Cracked me up. Family-friendly man indeed. 00:56, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I can't believe I was surprised. The guy is one sick fuck, or at least very conflicted. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 16:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * An excerpt from Ed's article creation log:


 * 1) Young,_Gay_and_Proud
 * 2) Guy_Williams
 * 3) Danger,_Will_Robinson
 * 4) Frot
 * 5) Pursuit_of_ethnic_Germans (redirect)
 * 6) Heteroflexible (redirect)
 * 7) Bisexual_until_graduation (redirect)

Earthland's block
He can unblock himself, unfortunately. --Irrational Atheist (talk) 17:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Eh...oh well. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 17:50, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * There is nothing I could possibly say that could make this seem any more ridiculous... but it was a joke! It was meant to be one. If someone claims that I am repeatedly inserting false information and this claim is enough to start a debate, then why shouldn't the claim of you uploading child porn be enough? I thought you get it.


 * By the way, there is nothing I could possibly say that could make you seem any more ridiculous, Irrational. Do I sound too provocative? Just let me know if you think so.


 * --Earthland (talk) 18:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey! I wasn't done feigning outrage!! &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * But one-hour block is irritating enough. --Earthland (talk) 18:04, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know.. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

"As gay as it gets"
I like you. You seem witty! LimpWrist (talk) 21:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I hope you're enjoying yourself here. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 21:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * For the most part. It looks like there's some site politics going on, which, being new, I'm avoiding at all costs. But, other than that, everyone here seems pretty cool. LimpWrist (talk) 21:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, there's always something going on behind the curtain. It's important to remember that a lot of us are only parodying the system and aren't really taking it seriously. It depends what you're here to do. You can make this place as serious or as fun as you want it to be. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 21:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Currently, the general atmosphere has taken a steep dive into the serious. I still have no idea how the joke suggestion of a Miniluv group actually got turned into a workable proposal. Broccoli (talk) 21:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I know, right? A lot of shit can happen on the weekends. I'm hoping it will settle this week and that the new cabal will fade away or become deliciously impotent. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 21:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, the pendulum will climb out of the mire (to shamelessly mix metaphors, rather than drinks) and it'll be silly again. Although hopefully with a bit more solid "back end", as programmers and gay men might say. --Kels (talk) 21:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

2 cents
I was going to put in my 2 penn'orth but you said it first ("...the whole thing is bollocks.")  16:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

You're through here. Do you hear me? Through.
Just you wait. I might not even wait until the voting is in before I unleash the hounds on you. Your pathetic reign of McCarthyite terror has met its Waterloo. Do you hear me?!?!?!? WATERLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! </BIG>TheoryOfPractice (talk) 21:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Dy'know, I've only just realised how much my life sucks. The wife is away for the night, I've just lost 2 poker tournaments because I suck at poker, and so now I'm sitting here watching QI, waiting for someone I know to log onto Skype just so I have someone to talk to, and looking at the recent changes on RW which is just comments like this. Mass bitching at each other. This place used to be nice. I used to think I belonged somewhere. And now I'm just sitting here feeling like shit. Thanks guys. 21:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * ...and people say I have no sense of humour. When I'm done stomping on Neveruse, Crundy, you're next. You hear me? NEXT. WATERLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! TheoryOfPractice (talk) 21:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It may very well be my Waterloo, TOP, but I think it will be much more like the Alamo. I know you've got the rest of the flock eating out of your hands. I don't know how anyone could fall for it, but they have. I'm prepared to stand my ground, even if doom is impending, because I'm willing to fight for what I believe in. One day, they'll look back on this and know that I was right. They will never forget. And they will never forgive (YOU). You'll be railroaded out of town on the Neveruse Commemorative Railroad. Mark my words. You will rue this day. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 21:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

w
Don't mess around with a mammoth. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  17:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

"I hope someone you love dies."
What the hell is wrong with you? Seriously. Even if it's a joke. Just... what the fuck? 17:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't take things seriously when you know they're not serious. I could give a fuck about accidentally crossing your imaginary lines. I also wanted to see if would Eddy get back on the horse and then stooped to my level in the same breath, but he's probably caught on by now. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 17:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Who are you, Marquis de Sade? Don't be a prick Neveruse. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  17:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Not everyone has the same sense of humour as you. I'm just saying that you're acting like a dickhead. That's all. I'll leave now. 17:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm well aware of that. There's just some people I don't care for and seeing them wound up over nothing cracks me up. You can make like NephilimFree and camp out here for all I care. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * See numbers 3 and 4. EddyP (talk) 18:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I am so busted! Now, quick, tell me you hope my mom dies. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC) And for the record, I wasn't saying I don't care. I was saying I don't care if SJ stays. While I do like him, I will enjoy him being worked up. Oh, that's #4 again! Oh that list is so pwn!
 * Oh no dude, I wasn't leaving the wiki, I meant leaving your talkpage. Needless to say I failed miserably. Now I'm really leaving!! (the talkpage) 23:57, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

w
'Mei: Neither funny nor useful.'

These are serious allegations. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  21:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You have hurt feelings. I understand. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  21:23, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No one understands me, Mei. No one. How you say, ;_____; &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 21:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * ;_______; < sympathy -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  21:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * *_______* < appreciation &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 21:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Since you've left me no alternative...
I have sent something in the post to the relevant parties. This could have been easily averted if you'd but chosen the correct course of action. Now it's too late. May God have mercy on both our souls. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

w

 * -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  21:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

YOU STOLE MY REVERT
YOU DIE NOW. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  17:41, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Much obliged. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  17:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm trying. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 17:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * List of people I like
 * Neveruse
 * -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  17:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

w
I'm starting to think you don't like ListenerX somehow. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  18:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * He's a pseudoscientist and utter douchebag who gets a free ride to push his ridiculous and illogical beliefs simply because he has nothing better to do than defend them. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:53, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * In that sentence, 'push' means 'talk about'. Super. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  18:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No, push means revert and go on and on and on until resistors give up. He's a psuedoscientist and will never stop trying to justify himself. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That still isn't what push means in the real world.
 * 'never stop trying to justify himself' - Yes that's what people do.
 * 90% of what he does is great. The other 10% is shit. He should be under various topic bans. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm really glad we don't have topic bans. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  19:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * (EC) Neveruse, I was not "gloating" in that section. I do not appreciate gothar involving themselves in politics at all, and I do not appreciate unsubstantiated accusations of article ownership. 19:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Unsubstantiated claims of article ownership? You're fucking insane. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * He obviously meant 'unsubstantiated' in the sense that you didn't substantiate them. I can see your confusion. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  19:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Fuck off for a second Mei... That I would even have to justify these allegations, like there's anyone who cares who hasn't been witness to LX's ownership of the article is insulting. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:08, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I didn't mean to insult you. Stop being angry. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  19:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It does make me angry that this douchebag parades himself around as a rational person, owns his pet article and defends it until no one else can stand it, then denies all of it. It'd be like me denying him calling him a douchebag until he actually trots out the evidence we all know exists. I don't see why I have to go through the motions when anyone who gives a shit already knows. The only thing "substantiating" his ownership of the article would do is give him another endless tangent about "ownership" and "cooperation" and "rationality" and somehow "Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem". It's his game to be a blowhard, esoteric douchebag. I'm not playing. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * zomg, how is Gödel involved? -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  19:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * He proved that not everything true is provable. An esoteric point, yes, but an earth-shattering one.
 * Neveruse, obvious truths are much more easily substantiated than most. On the other hand you appear to have no substantiations whatever for your claims. 19:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * EC I knew that part, I just didn't see the relevance. I should have guessed really. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  19:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * + it's not that esoteric. -- <font color="#000000"> = w =  19:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Like I said, I'm not playing your endless games just because you have nothing better to do. I'm thoroughly enjoying your delusions, though...You're just a rational guy who doesn't own that article! &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If you decline to "play [my] endless games," if that is how you refer to the requirement that accusations be substantiated before being swallowed whole, I suggest you drop any further dispute. 19:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

You're back?
Good. 'Cause we need to have a word. I just got out of the POLICE STATION because of what YOU said to them. 36 hours in a freakin' holding cell, numerous interrogations--I'm surprised they didn't being out the cattle prod. Look, bub, a joke's a joke, but this has gone too far. I'm considering legal action unless you Cease and Desist. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

JPatt's "values"
Man you just beat me to it.. Since you commented your edit with "Still needs work", I took a stab at it. Tried to add some of that article's tone into the WIGO, because I found it fairly amusing how it basically went "Well they did honor the soldiers... but normally they hate the military and want to destroy America and rantrantrant.. If you don't think it's any good, feel free to revert. --GTac (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the improvements. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 17:49, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Please stop being a prick. Thanks. Acei9 20:07, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I second the above motion. 20:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If only entertaining you two was as fun as entertaining myself... If you're not having fun, find something better to do. Jesus Christ... &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Say that's great! Now stop being such a pain. Thanks. Acei9 20:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't you have anything else to do? &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * "Ooh I was just doing it for the lulzzzz don't be so SERIOUS WIKI CABALL!!! LOLZ" is not an answer. Just stop being a prick. 20:17, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * That's funny cuz, uh...that's my answer. ignore or abuse. your choice, bitch. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 9am on a Saturday morning, fiancee asleep....so no, not right now. I'll do some gadening later. Acei9 20:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Stop breaking my Wiki
....Or is it Human's wiki today? I forget. Either way, stop breaking it! 07:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Check the schedule, I think Nx babysits while Human is gone. Anyway, what'd I do??? &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:15, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * hhahahahahaahahahahaahahahaha nice! 07:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You know damn well what you did you did. Trying to place bets of 5 internets on the admin abuse page is against teh roolz and will result in you being blocked for an amount of time to be deteremined by the student advisory panel.  07:33, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no idea why you think these people deserve the time of day, Goonie! I think the  should ban, block, and draw and quarter this user for crimes against humanity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! &mdash; Unsigned, by: Human / talk / contribs

After TK...
...you're next. I swear to God. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 15:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm so glad you finally took off that thin veil you used to cover up your animosity towards me. Made you look like a cheap whore. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 15:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

w
I like Neveruse. ^___________^ 21:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * aww... ;) &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 21:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I try to mention that I like people every now and then otherwise they forget. 21:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

As far as I know, it's not illegal to link to anything illegal
 * That is interesting because I think that was the defense TPB used in their actual trial - they don't actually host anything, they're really just a specialized search engine. In theory, the case is a new precedent in filesharing legality, but I wouldn't bet on it. Even if we take TPB as typical, there's no reason to expect legal complications unless we link to specific things to download. Although I am not a lawyer, just a bored geek, so probably none of this is true. 21:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Lucid. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 21:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I can do a good Osaka impression just by not trying. 21:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * BREAD EATING RACE. 21:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

r
thank you. :) http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:208.38.192.199&diff=next&oldid=559879 that's what I meant to do. At times rational thought eludes me. <font color="#000066">Refugee <font color = "#00F0A20">talk page 14:52, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

still blocked
fascists. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 13:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Shut up, MC. P-Foster (talk) 13:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If anyone should know better, it's you, Paul. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 13:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)