Talk:Brian Gerrish

This article seems to be slanted as a tirade against Gerrish rather than a non-biased report of him.
 * That's within our realm to do. See RationalWiki:SPOV. 12:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

This wiki has biased comments that do not address the fact that his main talks are about the "Child Snatching" by the state. This is backed by the fact that other members of parliament and political groups have cases of child snatching by the state which illustrates the point the Brian Gerrish is making that its a lucrative trade as local councils who are legally responsible get paid a huge sum of money towards care of a child which makes taking a child in to care a money earner. Think its not happening? Well I am currently in the situation of having a child services worker (formerly social worker) pushing issues that don't exist has called in to question my health and all the alarm wires have been tripped in relation to what I have seen published on line and what Brian Gerrish has talked about.

So its my opinion that the article you have about his "woo" is slanted and rational wiki needs to take on board that not all of his beliefs are simply "woo" but "fact" and the article should reflect that. 07:48, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Rational wiki
Clearly the main article is just a load of biased nonsense giving Rational wiki a very bad name. I wanted to find out more about Brian Gerrish from this article but it was unable to give me anything rational&mdash; Unsigned, by: 79.65.228.233 / talk / contribs
 * On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes ( ~ ) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) Thank you. Christopher (talk) 20:31, 10 September 2017 (UTC)