User talk:RationalChristian

-- 20:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * OK then!  20:49, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey buddy. What's rational about using a 3500 year old book written by marginally literate bronze age Jews as a road map or relying on people whose existence is pretty speculative? 21:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * God's Holy Word is the source of all that is rational and pure. His existence is no more speculative than yours, and a good deal less I should say.  Praise the Lord.  RationalChristian (talk) 08:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * God murdered Lennon. Bible is run by CIA. Give peace a chance. --Swedmann (talk) 11:18, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Praise the Lord indeed. Glory Hallelujah. The whole notion of giving any divine credence to the faith created by a group of ancients who decided in their wisdom which books among dozens of sometimes conflicting accounts of Jesus would be included in the canon seems at the very least grasping, but to each his own. Just don't go claiming it makes any sense. "Rational" doesn't mean what you think it means. 13:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I call Poe. Internetmoniker (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * D'ya think? Bondurant (talk) 14:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC)