Talk:Noah Carl

Noah Carl sacked
https://www.varsity.co.uk/news/17456 https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/cambridge-academic-noah-carl-sacked-over-racist-study-btdwlf5l6

'''ST EDMUND’S – website statement Statement from the Master regarding the outcome of the investigations into complaints about the appointment of Research Fellow – 30 April 2019'''

Tobias (talk) 07:48, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Thoughtcrime perp
There are grammar mistakes in this article such as misused commas; other articles are also filled with ungrammatical language, making it seem as though RationalWiki is written by vampire novel readers. And it is irrational for you to accuse Carl of being racist due to his publishing papers in pseudoscience journals. I'll be blocked for this thoughtcrime. &mdash; Unsigned, by: 1.143.56.238 / talk
 * Go ahead and fix the grammar if you want but it's quite implausible that Carl is not a racialist since he's been in OpenPsych multiple times and the London Conference twice. Bongolian (talk) 05:46, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Juvenile, sophomoric article
Well, I had been under the mistaken impression that RationalWiki must be something like Wikipedia but focussing on science & reason, but having read this article it's clear it's just a joke. At least most Wikipedia articles have a go at being objective. Whereas this article reads like it was written by an angry 1st-year undergrad student, so sure of himself with his B and two Cs at A-level he doesn't even pretend to be impartial. The word 'sophomoric' sums it up (though technically that would at least be a 2nd-year student). If this sounds like abuse, it isn't - just stating facts here. D- 82.71.12.56 (talk) 17:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh noes!! How ever will we function with our 42 citations DESTROYED by your arbitrary grading system!?!?! WOE IS US!!!! 18:31, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Noah Carl unsuccessfully tried to block this page from showing on Google.uk for defamation but failed
Carl filed a defamation report back in 2019, lying about himself and this page, I recently found it: https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/19135309

Although he redacted his name from the report to try to conceal his identity, we know it was him with 100% certainty because the identical descriptions only appear on this article by a search e.g. "both right-wing Islamophobes" and "Islamophobic and arguably far-right", "found its way onto many right-wing and far-right websites" etc.

The report was unsuccessful and Carl's page has been on Google.uk (like .com) and not deindexed by their search-engine. I find the report extremely dishonest - "both right-wing Islamophobes" is somehow defamatory? Carl openly identifies as a conservative (= right wing), furthermore, he published a bunch of controversial widely perceived as Islamophobic papers in OpenPsych.

This guy is another 'freedom of speech' warrior fraud. It's no surprise he tried redacting his name to try to hide the fact he is trying to censor articles that criticise him. He's clearly not pro-freedom of speech.2A03:E600:100:0:0:0:0:46 (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Can anyone identify this one?
https://www.lumendatabase.org/notices/15033450

I don't think this was Carl's since the dates don't work and it's talking about "sex with animals"? But it could be someone with a page with connections to him.2A0B:F4C2:1:0:0:0:0:1 (talk) 02:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Recent vandalism
Anyone know what the recent silly vandalism is about? I am creating an article soon on one of Carl's race pseudoscience colleagues. Boar (talk) 13:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * It's one of our regular trolls. See Michael Coombs. GeeJayK (talk) 14:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * They have a strange obsession with baldness. Seems they also reuse similar names they have used in the past year on Wikipedia (repeated uses of "duck", "bald" etc). I hid some of the more offensive comments on article. I suspect their account named Jerry Koyne was also a spoof of Jerry Coyne, although I could be wrong. Boar (talk) 14:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)