Talk:Web 2.0

So how should 'we the web-using public' game Web 2.0 to our advantage?

What will Web 3.33333 recurring be like? 171.33.222.26 (talk) 15:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Web 3.0: You can (not) redo.Arisboch (talk) 02:11, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * In Web 1.0, you wrote the content. In Web 2.0, you are the content. So obviously, in Web 3.0, the content is the content.  In fact, that's so brilliant that I'm off to write a business method patent.  50.1.143.98 (talk) 03:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

A BoN's comment
I removed the Schlafly-level idiocy, ageism, and racism in the article.—216.14.232.67 (talk) 15:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * How was any of the stuff you removed racist? Christopher (talk) 15:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Huh?
What kind of article is this?--Alola, my name is Delibirda! (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * One that's shit. — Oxyaena Harass  17:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * --Yes. I think it is a candidate for deletion.--Alola, my name is Delibirda! (talk) 09:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Done. — Oxyaena Harass  13:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
 * --Great!--Alola, my name is Delibirda! (talk) 10:11, 11 February 2020 (UTC)