Talk:Keith Olbermann

What is up with this website??? The Fox News page has snarky editorialism all over the place yet the left wing-related pages read like a proper Wikipedia article, only with bad grammar and editing. &mdash; Unsigned, by: 166.248.32.112 / talk / contribs
 * Thank you for your contribution. P-Foster Talk " Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing. " 01:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

I came here pleased that some right wing people were being skewered and lampooned yet all of the left-wing people are treated affectionally....that's if they're mocked at all. It just looks amateur.
 * Keith olberman, cannot nor has he ever done anythign wrong at all. he is a saint.  nay, a God.  [[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]Godot    Grow a vagina 02:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * We are not uncyclopedia. TyAnnoy 02:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Nobody is stopping you from editing. Shit or get off the pot. P-Foster Talk " Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing. " 02:12, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm just commenting on your editors. This site seems like conservapedia for the left. That's fine. Just be honest about it.
 * ....or you could stop being a whiny bitch and edit the article. That's fine too. P-Foster Talk " Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing. " 02:27, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Umad? No reason to pull the internet tough guy card. I haven't been convinced by anybody, especially you of all people, why I should edit articles on here and this is obviously a deceptive website. Like if CP called themselves rational wiki. Zero difference between the two.
 * and "JUST LIKE CP" double shot! TyAnnoy 02:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Whiny bitch it is, then. Thanks for coming. P-Foster Talk " Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing. " 02:37, 4 February 2012 (UTC)