Thread:User talk:Blue/What, exactly was your reasoning there?/reply (49)

I actually would like to understand the proposal, an active topic discussion on the wiki, which doesn't on it's face link a community consent to the ability to use tech rights to moderate. Perhaps you are unaware of the abilities of the tech, but they are pretty expansive prohibit certain language via the filters and creating ad hoc groups such as sysoprevoke without community consent. Furthermore, Blue was indeed the one who said that I did not like her--making it personal--which came after my pointing out something that really bothered me in the way the wiki funtions. Then she brings in apparently random topics about last May (which was nothing about tech-mod crossover). I suppose I have a "history" there, with my short life as a crat, but that never really crossed my mind in this whole thing. (I largely stayed out of at the time, although I could have made a far bigger fuss.) Her proposal talks about accountablility and asking moderators about what they do, but I guess I, for some reason, am not allowed.

If you wish to make Blue the victim, so be it. But the changes in the way rights are implemented has drifted over time and is an important topic to discuss--not a triviality. And they have the potential to significantly change the wiki, and some say they would already have.

So pardon me for caring.