Fun talk:Liberal

Numbers was teh phunny
 For those living in an alternative reality, Conservapedia has an "article" about and plenty of other lulz: But their contribution totally messed up the page formatting so I copied it here. human  02:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Classical liberal
 * Drinking Liberally
 * Embraced deceit
 * Godless liberal
 * Hollywood values
 * Intellectual dishonesty
 * Last wordism
 * Liberal activists
 * Liberal arts
 * Liberal Arts college
 * Liberal Bias
 * Liberal celebrity obsession
 * Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia
 * Liberal Christianity
 * Liberal deceit
 * Liberal Democrats
 * Liberal denial
 * Liberal Elite
 * Liberal Falsehoods
 * Liberal Fascism
 * Liberal friendship
 * Liberal Gloss
 * Liberal grading
 * Liberal hate speech
 * Liberal Hypocrisy
 * Liberal hysteria
 * Liberal ideology
 * Liberal Intellectualism
 * Liberal Lies About the American Right
 * Liberal logic
 * Liberal Media
 * Libera Mind
 * Liberal Myths
 * Liberal obfuscation
 * Liberal Party
 * Liberal quotient
 * Liberal redefinition
 * Liberal supremacist
 * Liberal Style
 * Liberal thinking processes
 * Liberal tools
 * Liberal tricks
 * Liberal values
 * Massachusetts Liberal
 * Professor values

Why don't we move this article to a "Fun:"...
And make a REAL article about Liberalism. That'd be fun, amirite?&mdash; Unsigned, by: 66.233.55.145 / talk / contribs 19:58, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments from an annoy editor, moved to talk page
Here is a question: Why is this site such a childish piece of garbgage? As a classical liberal, I find the petty snipes to be personally insulting. It makes this entire wiki seem like it was written by the shrill wonkette kids as opposed to clear-thinking adults. Rational, intellectual people have major legitimate disgreements on things such as "positive rights" and the ethical and moral justification for income redistribution. Just sayin'. (ISP only).
 * Hello, Sir BoN. As a classical liberal/libertarian myself, I understand your frustrations. However, RW as a whole is not that way, and they often differ on what rationialism is. I agree with you that there isn't moral or ethical justification for income redistribution. However, if you want to give your opinion, create an account and spout off on the debate or essay pages. Thanks.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I think this editor may have missed the "parody" indication at the top of this particular article.--BobSpring is sprung! 18:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The balloons? One can miss that?[[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]En attendant Godot  19:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe we should make them bigger. Тy talk 19:06, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Way too biased
This article sounds extremely sympathetic to liberals: instead of just making fun of them, it insidiously makes fun of the right-wing criticism they can be subjected to; meanwhile, the article “Conservative” is genuinely deriding conservatism… I suggest the former be rewritten as a critique of liberalism, to keep balance. The current state of affairs makes this wiki look left-leaning while it should be denouncing lies both from the right and the left.

(If you ask me what a funny bashing of liberalism would be, here’s an example of what I have in mind – although this one may be in a more hardcore tone – : http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Liberalism. ) — 193.200.150.152 (talk) 15:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * We aren't a balanced wiki. Тай говорить 15:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

LOL at the cartoon.
P.C. Lobe

Global Warming Panic Center

Work Ethic Molecule

Funny stuff Moonshot926 (talk) 08:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

I agreed intill I found out they were serious. look it up.

Betrix5068 (talk) 08:04, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Move to funspace
When compared to conservative this article is terrible, at least in mainspace. It ought to be moved to funspace and a new, good article created in its place to reflect a more politically balanced website - I THOUHT TIHSS WAS RATIONALEWIKI. I've fulfilled my duty as an editor by bringing this issue forward and further move that someone else does both of these things to save me the trouble of having to do anything else. 21:02, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure fine whatever, I agree, have a sweet.  Тyrannis Plead 21:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)