File talk:Édouard-Henri Avril.jpg

Now THIS is why I keep coming back. I can haz more hot girl-on girl action? PFoster 14:25, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Being a fish sort I am rather more attracted to the mermaids. Myself.  personally.  Carptrash 14:35, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * They're not going to remain "maidens" for long, at least not, if you include lesbian sex into the kind of sex, that counts as defloration.--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ ∈)☼(∋ 17:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Would you care for some hot octopus on girl action? Exotic!   w easeLOId [[Image: Weaselly.jpg|15px]]~ 14:36, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * "I thought you said he was dead." "No, I said he sleeps with the fishes." PFoster 14:37, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * i believe that print is called, Dreams of the Fisherman's Wife. But, yes,  sure.  It's a good start. Tho of course, scientifically speaking (is that not how we talk around here) octopii are NOT fishes.  Still close enough.  I mean, does the fisherman's wife know the difference? Carptrash 14:55, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Pedantically speaking, the correct plural is octopuses or octopodes, not octopi, since the word origin is Greek & not Latin. You are correct that octopuses are not fishes.  My post was actually a response to PFoster's original post rather than Carptrash's fish request.   w easeLOId [[Image: Weaselly.jpg|15px]]~ 15:35, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Have some more octo-porn.  w easeLOId [[Image: Weaselly.jpg|15px]]~ 15:43, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Personally, I've always wondered about mermaids. I mean, without getting to explicit, isn't the wrong half fish? I mean how do they, how would you, ..... you know ... [[Image:Th_unsure.gif]] --Bobbing up 14:56, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I discover to my endless fascination that there exists a whole Wikipedia article entirely about this question. -- 15:00, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * There was a Futurama episode that included that theme (as mentioned in the WP article). It appears that the mermaids cavorting in the background of this picture are biped mermaids (like the Starbucks logo), with two legs extending into fins or tails rather than a single fish tail, which kindof resolves the whole problem.   w easeLOId [[Image: Weaselly.jpg|15px]]~ 15:40, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * The fine WP article resolved all my problems anyway.--Bobbing up 15:41, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I do have a slight objection to posting this image in the mainspace article, seeing as to how it is more than a bit NSFW. I have no problem with the image, but honestly think that it should be linked to from the article with a NSFW warning, but not directly included in the article (plus, my roommate is a bit freaked thinking I am looking at pr0n.)
 * Your roommate should get over him/herself. As for the NSFW thing--do as I do: don't work for people who are all hung up. if THIS gets you fired, do you really want to spend 40 hours each week dealing with that type of person until you're 65? Priorities, man. PFoster 15:33, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * This can't be Pron. It was painted a long time ago by some now dead guy.  Consequently it can't be pron and must be art.--Bobbing up 15:38, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * If people are accessing the lesbianism article in work, they should know what to expect.  w easeLOId [[Image: Weaselly.jpg|15px]]~ 15:42, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Good point Ron. Генгис    15:50, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Not necessarily. The article is "lesbian", they could be quite innocently looking up the politics and people of the island of Lesbos. (Would this excuse work at work?)--Bobbing up 15:55, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Please book your holidays on your own time. Генгис    03:33, 29 September 2008 (EDT)