Essay:A Possible Direction for RationalWiki

This is essentially copied from my forum post from earlier today, but since very few of us are members there thus far, I thought I'd cross-post here for greater exposure.

Keep in mind this may be the ravings of a madwoman, only a half hour after she got up in the morning, but have a look and see if there are parts you agree or disagree with.

First of all, based on the way things are shaping up, I see the first and most obvious aspect of RW as refutation. Which is to say, every one of those "this is what people think" items on the front page should be accompanied by an article (or more) refuting their claims. Whether side-by-side comparisons or responsive essays, refutation is necessary.

Below that, we need a "bedrock" of basic information, written to our purposes rather than the drier, more exhaustive style of WP. Things like my own "homosexuality" and "same-sex marriage" articles, which support the refutations, essays, debates and such. Our toolkit, as it were.

Augmenting all this we have essays and debates, both of which make the site very personal and active, and as has been often said, a "neutral ground" for ideas to come together.

And finally, we need silliness. The articles on "tripe" or "faggot", the 1-minute bannings, the cheeky stuff we put on each others' talk pages, the ongoing lambasting of the Schlafly family (except John). We need that to keep that great happy atmosphere that's really kept my spirits up so far.

Commentary on all the above is welcome and encouraged.