Talk:Chuck Norris

Cleanup
So some of this is worth keeping. The rest is Unclyclo reject material. As inane bullshit is apparently sacred and can only be deleted with a supermajority or some shit, discuss. Тy talk 23:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

This is not homoerotic. At all.
Sophie because liberals  10:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Works if you play Careless Whisper over the top of it. Scarlet A.pngtheist 11:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * That's the first time I've voluntarily played Careless Whisper, you bastard. But you're right. Sophie  because liberals  16:14, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

What's with the animosity?
I don't like the guy personally either, but you have to admit that the internet meme is funny, and has been popular.105.101.118.97 (talk) 02:29, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

What's with the gay marriage?
There are many things you can critique about with Chuck Norris, but why are the jokes only revolving around gay marriage?
 * Because for a guy who built his brand around being a "macho tough guy" he sure seems insecure about gay marriage, or gay anything really. Comrade GC (talk) 04:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok, cool, but that doesn't mean that EVERY joke has to be about his fear of gay marriage, since the rest of the article isn't fully devoted to it. Also, some of these jokes are just terrible. This needs to be cleaned up. 69.60.33.176 (talk) 18:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Huh, I get the feeling that the jokes just aged badly as Chuck Norris is such an ancient internet joke by now. He was talked about a ton back in like 2007. 00:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I mean, this is just my opinion of course, but I think they defy the structure of how Chuck Norris jokes were presented, which leads them to sounding more like non-sequiturs than jokes proper. Only #2 and #12 sound like they keep with the format of the joke. 69.60.33.176 (talk) 15:41, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Get your Chuck Norris facts straight
Please correct fact #12. The inventor of the telephone was Antonio Meucci.
 * Wikipedia actually lists five people that are credited, so I have to include a note. Yes, the comment's back in November, but if you notice the response, I finally got around to it. Sorry for the wait! 00:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC)