User talk:98.163.212.25

First, you don't inject your personal disagreements with an article, especially not while you're replacing information. You bring this up in the talk page. Second, when someone reverts your edits, you should not undo it either. Bring it to the talk page.

"Tom is techically right; "can" arbitrarily force insurance companies...., not 'would', 'Rational'Wiki"

First and most obvious, mocking/emphasizing/airquoting the "Rational" part of RationalWiki is the most common, lazy, and trite criticism users have for the Wiki that we have a drinking game for it.. Second, your edit makes little to no sense being grammatically a sentence fragment and relies on pedantry and semantics rather than actual argument.

"This sentence shouldn't be here if he's talking about the Progressive Era specifically."

This one also makes little sense. The original argument is that Thomas Sowell tries tarring "the left" with the same brush as supporters of racialism when racialism is a dominantly by any extent a right-wing school of thought. Sowell is generalizing the component of racialism and attributing it to a specific era in American history, not logically sound, especially when ultimately, it is adopted by mostly right-wing figures. The source itself is broken, so I can't check if Sowell is actually arguing this, but either way, your edit is not helpful and has been reverted. 04:55, 14 October 2018 (UTC)