College fraternity



You don't need a secret society in a nation that already gives you the right to speech and assembly; in fact it's counterproductive for an open democracy to have them. Besides, if fraternities were all about charity and openness they'd just be like every other college group on campus, and hundreds of thousands of college students are not lining up to rush Amnesty International. A college fraternity is a social fraternal organization based in a college or university with membership limited to students and alumni. The concept originated in America, based in part on older fraternal orders such as Freemasonry.

The first college fraternity was Phi Beta Kappa, which was founded in 1776 at the College of William and Mary. At some point in the early 19th century Phi Beta Kappa evolved from the prototypical fraternity into an academic honor society. Phi Beta Kappa, as the model for future fraternities, in turn derived its structure from Freemasonry, including secrecy, initiation, oaths, and rituals. In 1825, the longest extant college fraternity was established at Union College, the Kappa Alpha Society.

The early fraternities formed to escape control by overbearing college administrators. Subsequently, fraternities have existed to create and maintain privilege. As such, they are anti-democratic, and have been among the last opponents of slavery abolition (though this was primarily among Southerners),  higher education for women,  and desegregation,  as well as being bastions of overt racism (e.g. as expressed by blackface).

The fraternities of the 19th century frequently included literary exercises and debating as part of membership activities, but by the turn of the century, these aspects had been dispensed with entirely. By the 1950s, some fraternities had actually become anti-intellectual.

Ostensibly, fraternities act as philanthropic organizations, but this has been overstated. Fraternities also act as nepotistic employment networking organizations for their membership.

Problem behavior and the aftermath
The problems caused by college fraternities are not restricted to colleges or to fraternities. Organizations that have hazings (military, sororities, and even Masons) have had hazing-associated deaths. A combination of traits associated with college fraternities is likely the cause for the frequent problems: wealth and privilege, unsupervised young men, alcohol abuse, and secrecy with implicit blackmail. Indeed, Sage Carson, project manager for Know Your IX, said, "Fraternities are set up to support behaviors of toxic masculinity." Colleges have frequently tried to dissociate or remove "bad" fraternities from campuses, but this has rarely solved the problem behavior. In 2013, Wesleyan University unsuccessfully tried to force all three of its fraternities to accept female residents (not as members). Two accepted and the third (Beta Theta Pi) ended its formal association with Wesleyan, but retained its membership within the university and the problems that it continued to cause. Reform campaigns against fraternities have been difficult: No sooner has a new 'Men of Principle' or 'True Gentlemen' campaign been rolled out — with attendant workshops, measurable goals, initiatives, and mission statements — than reports of a lurid disaster in some prominent or far-flung chapter undermine the whole thing.

Though fraternity constitutions and rules often appeal ideals to chivalry and honor,  the reality of fraternity behavior is often different.

It is not really possible to ban fraternities in the democratic societies because of (the First Amendment in the US) — and because many fraternity alumni are very generous to their alma maters — so the best solution seems to be suing fraternities into better behavior.

Hazing
Fraternities share the common elements of secrecy (including rituals), an initiation process (rushing or recruitment, pledging or probationary period/associate membership, hazings, and initiation of full membership), and living in a common dwelling exclusively with members. The concept of hazing new members to a group (as well as the criticism of it) is not restricted to fraternities, but is ancient and culturally widespread, dating at last as far back as Plato. Nuwer defines hazing as: An activity that a high-status member orders other members to engage in or suggests that they engage in that in some way humbles a newcomer who lacks the power to resist, because he or she wants to gain admission into a group. Hazing can be noncriminal, but it is nearly always against the rules of an institution, team or Greek group. It can be criminal, which means that a state statute has been violated. This usually occurs when a pledging-related activity results in gross physical injury or death.

Scott Saucier, whose son died in a fraternity hazing and who then became an outspoken critic of fraternity hazing, has described fraternities as cult-like because some aspects of fraternities overlap with cults: isolation, authoritarianism  as well as sexual manipulation, violence and surrender of will during initiation. There is also evidence of bait-and-switch in pledging: fraternity pledge J. B. Joynt wrote in his notebook before he died, apparently from exhaustion during a night of coerced wrestling matches: I've done too many dishes, too many pushups, and been bitched at by one too many brothers to quit now. I'm halfway there & I'm ready to do whatever it takes to get Phi Sigma Kappa letters.

Alcohol
It's probably obvious to anyone who knows anything about college fraternities that they are intimately tied to alcohol consumption, and so is essentially every shit-hit-the fan incident at fraternities: If the [FIPG] manual were Anna Karenina, alcohol policy would be its farming reform: the buzz-killing subplot that quickly reveals itself to be an authorial obsession. For good reason: the majority of all fraternity insurance claims involve booze—I have read hundreds of fraternity incident reports, not one of which describes an event where massive amounts of alcohol weren't part of the problem—and the need to manage or transfer risk presented by alcohol is perhaps the most important factor in protecting the system's longevity. Although one reason for joining a fraternity is supposed to be the making men out of boys, the reality is rather different: The ones that go out every night to the bars and get drunk are seen as the most masculine guys in the house. They are the ones that exemplify what it is to be a man. You are often called derogatory names when you deny a shot or deny yourself a beer. The amount of verbal assault on your masculinity when denying a drink is unreal. Drinking in a fraternity is by far the most common activity that is done. It is the purest form of what it is to be a man.

Death and mayhem
The first reported fraternity death was in 1873 from hazing at Cornell University. There has been at least one fraternity-related school death every year from 1961 to 2019 from hazing.

Rapes and sexual assaults
In 2014, there were 36 reported rapes or sexual assaults in US fraternities, roughly 3.6 per month (discounting summer break). In 2018, there were nationwide "337 open investigations at 243 schools for possibly mishandling reports of sexual violence." Seventy-five documented incidents of fraternity gang rape occurred within a 6-year period, but for obvious reasons, this is probably an under-reporting. One fraternity member reported that "trains" (gang rapes) occurred once or twice a month at his fraternity.

Fraternity pledges have also been subjected to coercive, sadistic, and demeaning sexual acts during initiation, including paddling of buttocks and the "elephant walk" or "elephant drill". An official song ("Yo-Ho") at one fraternity even included lyrics of death by fellatio.

A study of all first-year men at a public university looked at the effectiveness of a sexual assault intervention program known as The Men's Program (MP). Effectiveness of the program was judged using results of The Sexual Experiences Survey (SES). The study found that men who joined fraternities were more likely to commit sexually coercive acts during their first year in college (8%) than those who did not join fraternities (2.5%). Men who joined fraternities during their first year and who did not participate in MP were more likely to commit sexually coercive acts (10%) than those who joined fraternities and did participate in MP (6%) during their first year, which was attributable to those fraternity men who did not participate in MP. The study also found that men who participated in MP experienced a long-term decline in rape myth acceptance (the myth that women want to be roughed up, that women pretend not to want sex, or that sexually liberated women are promiscuous). Unlike many previous intervention programs, The Men's Program was effective in reducing the incidence of sexually coercive behavior. The authors of the study attributed the effectiveness of MP compared to previous programs to it being theory-based, data-based, peer-reviewed, and flexible. A limiting factor for changing the sexual behavior of fraternity members is that there is evidence that the most sexually aggressive men tend to self-select towards joining fraternities.

Bigotry
White fraternities have been racially exclusionary — even segregationist — for much of their history. They have included racist, antisemitic, homophobic, and sexist elements into their initiation processes, and have long held racist theme parties.

One of the more perplexing aspects of fraternities is the often homoerotic aspects of initiation rituals but the expression of homophobia elsewhere. The reason for this may have been because some fraternities before the 1920s were havens for closeted gay men, but after the arrival of larger numbers of women on college campuses in the 1920s, the men felt obliged to aggressively express heterosexuality lest they be outed from their closets. Anthony James has argued that the homoerotic aspects of fraternities increased following World War II because of increased public awareness of homosexuality (e.g., the founding of  in 1950 and  in 1955). The increased homoeroticism was an attempt to humiliate pledges as much as possible, but at the same time it required compensation with more aggressive expressions of heterosexuality in social life.

Litigation
Something that pledges, most fraternity members, and parents of fraternity members probably do not know until the shit hits the fan is that there are effectively no individual college fraternities, there is but a single college fraternity under a giant liability umbrella. This started in 1996 after individual fraternities became uninsurable after a series of lawsuits. Thirty-two fraternities now belong to the Fraternity Risk Management Trust (FRMT), a self-insurance fund. It doesn't sound very glamorous or exclusive to say that one belongs to the FRMT, so the fraternities have kept their names and one can still claim that one belongs to Kappa Alpha or whatever. A consequence of the establishment of the FRMT is that it is all about self-preservation as a trust, not preservation of individual fraternity members or even individual chapter houses. Just like any insurance fund, they don't want to have to pay out if they don't have to, and that means finding blame somewhere else. In 1987, the Fraternal Information and Programming Group (FIPG) was also created to minimize risk. The FIPG produces a 50-page manual for individual fraternity houses to follow. Two of consequences of this are 1) that parents of a dead or injured child are likely to be notified of the incident by a coroner or hospital 2) national consultants show up and tell the fraternity members to each fill-in questionnaires about the incident and to be completely honest and forthcoming. This second part basically means that — without the presence of a lawyer — frat bros are encouraged to either self-incriminate or rat on their fellow bros depending on their involvement. This often enough lets FRMT off the hook for financial damages, and can put parents on the hook. One lawyer who specializes in fraternity law said, "I've recovered millions and millions of dollars from homeowners' policies."

The combination of pledging secrecy and the initiation process has traditionally acted as an implicit blackmail threat for members not to reveal misdeeds of their fraternity brothers. For example, pledges and alumni are sometimes required to sign "vile, sexist pledge books".

Goats
As with the Freemasons, fraternities have occasionally been associated with goats. Tom Earp, a Lambda Chi alumnus, wrote for the fraternity newsletter about this association. Earp concluded, perhaps with some bias, with a rather benign explanation that it is based on, which describes the scapegoat as the bearer of sins. Fraternities' relationships with goats have not always been benevolent, however, as there has been at least one case of cruelty toward a goat by a fraternity.