User talk:Kwilky

00:22, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

This is already nicer than conservapedia :) Kwilky 00:26, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * So long as you don't the, we're pretty amicable. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 00:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad you like it. Most of us have spent our penance time at CP, and have had similar experiences.   00:27, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I can't remember how I found it, but I got kicked for 'too many reversions' after making the points on talk pages that cancer and abortion were not linked and that there is more proof of gay animals than god. I didn't get a special message! I wish he found me clueless. Kwilky 00:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course cancer and abortion are linked! CP says so, so it must be truth!   00:31, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah! i forgot about that. Schlafly is an expert in that field and many investigations showing a positive correlation HAVE shown a positive correlation. That's pretty rare. Kwilky 00:35, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Dont be fooled. Under the charming veener of this wiki there is a unseemly underbelly ripe deceit, dark secrets and murderous intent. Be on your guard. Ace McWickedCurrently Lurking..... 00:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello. Would you like to join the Cabal?  -- 01:01, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Dont trust him! He's one of the ones I warned you about, he'll take you into the cellar a beat you with a damp telephone book. I cuaght him licking his trousers once - a sure sign of a diseased mind. Ace McWickedCurrently Lurking..... 01:05, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * i read the cabal page and i don't understand it at all :') i may be being thick but yeah. i'll trust ace mcwicked. i'm so confused. Kwilky 01:15, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

My message to DE MAN.
Dear Mr. Schlafly, or any of your acolytes,

I have been wandering around the pages of these websites for a while now, and I have a few comments to make.

Firstly, your insistence that evolution is implausible. It is plausible, because it did happen. We have proof of this. We have conducted experiments into this. For example, Richard Lenski (Who, coincidentally, wrecked you in an email which you seem to not be able to reply to) did this. There is fossil evidence, there is geologic evidence, biological evidence, ALL TYPES OF EVIDENCE.

As such, I would like you to link me to a page where there is evidence of God, and I mean empirical evidence, because you are obsessed with that. So obsessed, even, that you accused wikipedia of having a 'liberal bias' for not having a page on it. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE TO YOU?

Secondly, I would like a link to all these surveys that suggest there to be a strong link between abortion and breast cancer; i have searched the internet and i have not found one. So I would like your help in this matter.

Also on the subject of not forcing everyone to have babies, are condoms. Condoms are not unholy and I would like a link to a page that suggests that they spread AIDs, because there are lots of pages that suggest they prevent it.

Again with evidence, where is your evidence that there is no homosexuality in myths? There are lots of observations that suggest there are. I don't quite understand where you get your information, unless, god forbid, you make it up.

Your page on Dawkins says that you don't think he is a 'real' professor. By this, I assume you are accusing Oxford, or Dawkins, or Both of legal misjustice? If so, I would like for you to take it up with the police.

Global warming may be exaggerated to an extent, but it was under BUSH'S regime that the Kyoto treaty got published. BUSH is conservative.

Being gay, or being non religious, or being black or muslim or mexican or whatever else it is you're against, is NOT unholy. Nowhere in the bible does it state 'americans rule, ok?' NOWHERE. IT WASN'T EVEN DISCOVERED.

Yes, it suggests homosexuality is bad, but that's really just ignorance from the time which you have gloriously managed to keep up. Well done, Well done.

You are rewriting the bible, i learn, because you think it is wrong. Do you know how hypocritical that sounds? How utterly silly. you encourage everyone to follow the bible to the WORD, yet you don't believe it enough to be comfortable with not rewriting it? Interesting.

Now onto the website itself, and how it acts.

You have never argued properly, you delete and you block and you make up statistics. You have never won. I find it to be disgusting that you believe that 'bias' will be stamped out by removing all those who oppose your exact views. Very disgusting.

Your website CAN NOT be used as a homeschooling tool, the only thing it has any information on is all lies, and all things not related to your trumped up views are glanced over. E.g. 'emo,' 'mario,' 'the simpsons,' etc etc etc.

People laugh at your website. All over the internet, it is mocked, and despised by everyone. You yourself are laughed at, and ridiculed, and derided as a moron. Do you enjoy this? Are you that twisted?

On the Lenski page, it has been written that his views are widely criticised. All the criticisms, Mr Schlafly, come from you. And as mentioned before, he totally destroyed them all in a lengthy email which is circling the net as further proof of your idiocy.

Obama is not a muslim.

The war in afghanistan is not going well. Evolution is more widely accepted than anything else. Distance DOES affect time, as argued against in your starlight article. Most christians think you are a nitwit. You are racist. You are homophobic. You are sexist. You are odd. People laugh at your website, and they mock it, and I don't want that! Nobody does! I have an open mind and I am willing to listen, so when you are ready please reply, or make one of your slave-people reply and rebutt all these points.

I don't want the internet thinking you look silly. Not at all.

Good day Mr Schlafly

Lots of love, 13:23, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
 * The preceeding unsigned comment was posted by Kwilky. I could not agree more with your letter, but I reckon the only way those points will enter Assfly's mind is if carved on bullets and fired in to his skull. Ah, pleasing thoughts. Hey, welcome to RW. --Concernedresident 12:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, i did try to sign it, it must have not worked. No it didn't work, and caused a range block on like, a lot of english computers, by the one and only TK. The account 'essence' also got banned for 'moronic vandalism.' I don't understand how Andy Schlafly has not yet been shot, you raise a good point. Kwilky 12:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Disagree with him all you want, but you should refrain from alluding to him being shot. He likes to take words like that and contact the FBI.   22:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the warning. I forgot about that. Kwilky 20:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Commie Rot
Comrade! You have been made a sysop due to your service to The Society! The Leader welcomes you into his inner circle! Dont forget your little red book!. Ace McWickedI'm a pretty big deal around here... 20:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm a sysop already? Wow! Cool :) I swear I've not done anything but I won't argue. :) Kwilky 20:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Arguing with The Leader is a punishable offence. Ace McWickedI'm a pretty big deal around here... 20:40, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm now terrified. Kwilky 20:43, 28 September 2009 (UTC)