User talk:Sherryjblair

I thought the article on The Celestine Prophesy was biased in favor of the author's opinions and world view. The Wikipedia on the same subject is far superior leaving the judgements up to the reader. Here is a link to that site for all to read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Celestine_Prophecy If you must edit or rewrite my comments, do not attribute your comments to me.

Please read our policies. We are aiming for a to debunk the junk, Wikipedia aims for a neutral tone. The Celestine Prophecy's nine "insights" are junk. Think of our article as an extended "reception and critique" section, except mostly critique. Comments are not supposed to be altered anyway, even for grammatical errors, so yeah. 17:52, 21 September 2018 (UTC)