User talk:Kels/Spellchecked Genesis

Can you highlight the spelling mistaeks? I'm too bored to read through the entire text, and then compare it to my KJV genesis. 20:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No. If someone wants to volunteer, that's no problem, but I ain't doin' it. --Kels 20:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It's probably a bit more fun not to see them coming. He beat his sons and daughters indeed... 20:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * My personal favourite is 15:21. --Kels 20:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, and give a look at 32:30. --Kels 21:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * My computer cannot handle this page. Can someone with a better computer break it down into smaller, more managable bits? Thank you. 21:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Can I have your source for a wikiformatted Genesis? Thanks.   21:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I made it myself out of this, and then just did the dog work of formatting it after I ran the spellcheck. All I have saved is this version, though. --Kels 21:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Darth, I may be wrong, but I think we have the whole Bible wikified somewhere on the site, to support a "verse citing" template of some sort that I'm not sure Trent ever made really work. 22:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, go, they're all near the top. 22:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh, if someone feels this would fit better in mainspace or wherever, please be my guest. --Kels 22:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't care about mainspace, as I can't even read this article... 22:16, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I gathered that, but I don't even know if it's staying in my userspace. If it doesn't, it can get broken up somehow (I have no idea by what creteria) at that time. --Kels 22:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Break it into chunks by "topic"? Creation One, Creation Two, Flood, etc.?