User talk:KyleButler

Coop
21:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I've decided that no action should be taken. I do, however, advise you to tone down on the needlessly vitriolic language (especially when your remark about female infanticide was on a complete tangent) if you want to avoid another coop case. 22:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * In light of edits you’ve made since Lefty said this, I’m warning you that if you don’t stop the blatant racist and sexist attacks against murder victims I’m banning you. Christopher (talk) 16:58, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Have you actually read Bailey Holt or Rachel Scott's bio? They are obviously the type who would vote for Trump. Why would a fellow liberal like you have any sympathy for someone like that? Sure, it's kind of sad that whatever they may have done resulted in the punishment of death without the opportunity for them to change, and for all intents and purposes, they were quite beautiful, but their death just means that the chemical reactions in their bodies keeping the cell matter "alive" have ceased, not much different really than a video game character dying unless you knew them personally. Valuing the life of individual humans you don't know, when they are one of billions of people, is a fundamentalist thing. I'm a realist, those bitches didn't mean shit to me, why do they mean anything to you? And don't ban me for asking a valid question. I am honestly curious. KyleButler (talk) 17:25, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Please do not lump me in with individuals like yourself, it is quite distasteful. Comrade GC (talk) 17:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * What's that supposed to mean? Cause I'm black? Damn racist white prick. KyleButler (talk) 17:36, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * *claps* Thank you for being one of the most predictable individuals on this site, and for the record you have no idea what my skin color is. I addition my comment about you being "distasteful" had nothing to do with the color of your skin but the content of your character, or rather the lack of any. Comrade GC (talk) 17:40, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Fundamentalist prick who doesn't want to question morality or say anything that is mean. You know, Bailey and Rachel were pretty but they are dead, you can't have sex with them now. KyleButler (talk) 17:43, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * You are quite the amusing creature throwing words around as if their meaning was arbitrary. How quaint.
 * PS: My original suspicions about you being our local child/vandal/troll are looking a tad more justified with your current behavior. Perhaps ceasing said behavior might be the wisest course of action. Or not, it's your choice. Comrade GC (talk) 17:51, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm blocked, you never gonna take me seriously anyway. Prove me otherwise and reinsert the factually sound statement about media coverage, otherwise. KyleButler (talk) 17:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I knew Bailey personally, and she was a racist bitch. That is why I want RationalWiki to reflect her true character. She was alright until I asked her to prom, then she her true racist nature showed when she said no. KyleButler (talk) 17:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Quit your whining you silly child it's only a nine hour block, and 2) bullshit. Comrade GC (talk) 18:01, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Silly child? You mean like Bailey and Rachel? Just look at Bailey with those silly looking dorky glasses! In all seriousness, I want to have a serious discussion about this topic, but some of you guys just make me laugh to damn much. I'm gonna go take a chill pill and try to be civil when the block expires. KyleButler (talk) 18:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

How is this jerk not long term blocked?
,, this moron has said absolutely disgusting things about someone who was recently killed in a vicious way, someone who appears to have been (based on the now deleted link that was posted) a very sweet and inmocent young lady. The link he posted had pictures of her as she was recently as well as pictures when she was a little girl, anyone who would say such vile things about such a sweet child needs to be blocked more than nine hours. The irony is he is accusing someone he probably never even knew as being mean and being a "bitch" when what he is doing is deplorable. 172.58.12.202 (talk) 20:25, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't disagree with you at all, as I was the one who opened the original coop case against him, but I don't think there's anything in the rules here that actually warrants a permaban for him (I'm not sure if posting her public Facebook page is doxxing, but I don't think so since everybody knows her name and could find it easily). 20:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If he makes one more edit related to murder, he’s blocked for infinity. He’s an obvious troll. Christopher (talk) 21:03, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * FINAL WARNING: KylieButler, you have went beyond benefit of doubt. Everyone in the community is telling you to knock it off right this moment. If you make one more distasteful and discourteous comment after your ban, you will be blocked, if not get raised for the coop case for a perma-ban. I changed my stance on you and I now believe you are a troll. 03:11, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Edit War
Knock off the edit warring in the mass shooting articles. If other editors dispute your edits, bring it up in the talk page and wait until other editors come to the consensus. Edit war further and the page will be locked until you can resolve this with others. 04:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * you are obviously a white slut. KyleButler (talk) 06:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not phased by random clowns on the internet pulling the "white slut" card, pal. 07:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Vandal bin and banned
You are now vandal binned and banned for two weeks for continued misbehavior (edit warring, personally attacking a user after being told to stop) even after being brought up in the Chicken Coop and given a final warning. 06:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Dude, it's one thing to troll these rats, but you know that poor little girl's grieving family and friends could find your hateful words and be very hurt, right? The fact that I get blocked for infinity for posting silly or vulgar stuff directed at admins while this clown only gets two weeks speaks volumes about the morals of Rat-Wiki. 172.58.11.189 (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Lmao, you have no right to complain about the morals of him when you've made usernames calling for genocide, told me that I should be raped, and attacked many other users with similar comments. And you've done this for 10 years. I think it's pretty reasonable for you to be blocked for infinity. 14:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The difference is, no one other than you is going to be hurt by that, and the idea is to run you from the site. It's a lawful form of protest. I truly hope this guy is not deliberately trying to hurt these people's families. PS, if this guy thinks girls are mean to him, he should try actually being nice to them. I'll bet most of them will be nice to him if he is nice to them. 172.58.11.189 (talk) 15:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, so harassing and hurting people is okay if you don't like the website they use. Your logic is impeccable. 15:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Ahh, so running a website that makes fun of people you don't like and encourages people to vandalize Wikipedia and other wikis is okay, but it's bad if someone vandalizes your wiki. Your logic is impeccable! Go back to class. 172.58.11.189 (talk) 15:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * We make fun of people we don't like, but not in an awful, extremely hurtful way like KyleButler and you do. Dunno what wiki you're on, but we don't ever encourage people to vandalize Wikipedia, Conservapedia, or any other wiki. At one point in the past, we may have encouraged vandalism of CP, but that's over. And FWIW, I support permabanning KyleButler. 15:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Young lady, I have dealt (and continue to deal with) old guard trolls from this site on Wikipedia where I am an administrator. I have been involved with this site since you were eating corn dogs in Kidsway Cafe at your elementary school, and imo, it needs to be shut down. Calling this a charity/nonprofit foundation is such a farce. If you want a debunking website, you non-trolls need to start a new one. 172.58.11.189 (talk) 15:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm calling bullshit on that one. Comrade GC (talk) 15:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)