User talk:Ameripedia

Hello! Pippa (talk) 15:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Morning!--Ameripedia (talk) 15:14, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Afternoon here. [[File:Excited.gif]] you're my first ! Pippa (talk) 15:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, though!--Ameripedia (talk) 15:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * And have you seen my proposal by chance?--Ameripedia (talk) 15:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Yup, but I'm a left wing atheist Brit, so not likely to have any real opinion you'd like to hear. Pippa (talk) 15:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Quite.--Ameripedia (talk) 15:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hope you aren't feeling too shot down over your proposal, and best wishes to any or all wikis you might want to create. :-)  Civic Cat (talk) 17:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem.--Ameripedia (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

your wiki seems to be down!
01:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I think all of Wikkii is down. I can't get New CP either. George, are you there? I demoted you here! Here's your compass.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 01:51, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Is that why I couldn't get on? I hope it's temporary. Thanks, Colonel, for the sysopship. I may return the favor if I can prove you a legitimate contributor. I need all the help I can get, as the Lockett incident proved.--George (talk) 01:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Blocking
Please use the vandal bin for vandals as opposed to blocking. You can disable account creation and is more effective than blocking because they can still edit but at a significantly decreased rate. Thank you. RatMaster háblame 22:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Hey
Your site's got an article here. Good luck with your wiki. 14:52, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks!--George (talk) 14:07, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Block
It may have been a mistake to block this user, I think he was new to wikis and was just experimenting. It may be better in such cases to warn the user and block only if behaviour persists. Blocking users may put them off editing wikis and put them off our aims and ideals. I've made mistakes like that too but I hope I've learnt better. Proxima Centauri (talk) 18:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

What the fuck is this shit?
All Ace seemed to be doing was harassing the user, so I locked his talk page until further notice. What the fuck? I made one (or maybe two edits) to this users talkpage - no harrasement or vandalism. Also, where does Rob get off accusing me of sockpupperty? Aceace 22:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Two. And the way you worded your query, along with American's deletion of your posts, seemed to merit that action. Nobs seemed to have an interesting point. This is not your doing, right? He is not your sockpuppet.--George (talk) 23:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, whatever. But Rob can say anyone is everyones sock but without any sort of evidence it is just another wild claim. You show me where on your wiki I have made uncivil remarks, vandalised or trolled and I'll apologise. At the moment all you have is Rob making unjustified claims. Aceace 23:16, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The main thing I saw was your trolling on User:American's talkpage.--George (talk) 23:19, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * There's more; this had to be oversighted. nobsabandon hope all ye who enter here. 23:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I should block you for profanity, Ace. Ameriwiki is a family-friendly site. I will not this time, but I shall instruct every administrator to do so if this happens again. Thanks, Nobs.--George (talk) 23:29, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I have been told once already, onsite, and have yet to repeat it. Aceace 23:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah and since when do you define asking a question of a user, and not repeating it nor harrasing the said user as "trolling"? Aceace 23:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * You did repeat it. You asked him, he removed it. You put it in again. I have to protect his page. Also, look at the way you asked it. That qualifies as harassment.--George (talk) 23:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * So, I made a comment, it got reverted. I made it again because I was under the impression is shouldn't have been reverted but I get reverted again. I didn't continue to post on the users page and haven't for..must be over a month now...and that is harassment? Riiiight. Aceace 23:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * So, if I unlocked his page right now, you wouldn't make comment.--George (talk) 23:43, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't even know the page was locked dude, over react much? Aceace 23:44, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * And two more things, at RW we don't delete expletives (much as I will avoid swearing at your wiki at RW we swear at lot - house rules and all that). Secondly if Rob/Nobs wants to throw accusations of scokpupperty around he should substantiate them also. Otherwise that is trolling dude. Aceace 23:46, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough. And for Nobs' accusations, I will leave it to him to back up. If he can't, don't worry. You aren't blocked and American keeps his account.--George (talk) 23:53, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I am glad we could come to an understanding. But like I told Rob once before - I don't need socks. Anyone can testify that I'll do what I want anyway, I have no need for socks. Aceace 23:57, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Just don't swear at my wiki and don't troll/vandalize and you'll be all right.--George (talk) 00:04, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Why would anyone bother to sock up on Ameriwiki, particularly if they are trying to impersonate Ken DeMyer? And if they did, why would they try to point it out with their own account? It couldn't possibly be that Rob just has an axe to grind with Ace... (ʞlɐʇ) ɹǝɯɯɐHʍoƆ 15:49, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Ace swears up and down all over this wiki, and privately, he has no need for socks. Yet when presented with the evidence (Conservapedia:The_Zeuglodon_Blues) he readily admits to it. It's a question of the credibility of the user.  nobsabandon hope all ye who enter here. 23:54, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * When the fuck did Ace ever have credibility or honor in his playbook?--Mikalos209 (talk) 23:55, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah that was three years ago Rob. I have had socks on Conservapedia but have none on RW, aSK or Ameriwiki. Aceace 23:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Had socks? you were the puppet master, according to Conservaleaks. nobsabandon hope all ye who enter here. 00:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Over a 2 month period 3 years ago. Ohhh what a master! Aceace 01:05, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Deny deny deny, but the simple facts are you (a) engaged in deceptive practices, and (b) denied it, and (c) later admitted to it. Case closed. nobsabandon hope all ye who enter here. 02:19, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Show me where I denied it. Aceace 02:24, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, so you don't deny engaging in deceptive practices. Pardon me. nobsabandon hope all ye who enter here. 02:27, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I have no socks on Ameriwiki nor is Mikalos my sock. Aceace 02:28, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Me, a sock? O.o--Mikalos209 (talk) 02:30, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * So you can log in and out in two minutes; get yourself two computers, it would give you more credibility. nobsabandon hope all ye who enter here. 02:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Are you talking to me or me Mikalos? Aceace 02:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Or you can be smart and use two internet browsers.--Mikalos209 (talk) 02:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Of course. 02:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * My bad. I work with criminal psychopaths all the time, should've known better. Just not in the habit of thinking like that. nobsabandon hope all ye who enter here. 02:44, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Realwiki
I'm thinking about another go on Realwiki given your official beheading- the world needs a true alternative to SamCoulter's German nationalism in a conservative encyclopedia. I'm going to recruit SamHB and Ronald as well, so that we can have a credible conservative encyclopedia. This is enough of Germany and Taylor Swift. That RINO and his imbecile sidekick will cower in fear if you ditch that popsicle stand and join realwiki. Regards, --Elvis is King (talk) 14:48, 14 May 2012 (UTC)