Talk:Pyrenean Ibex

Oh noes! An off-mission article! Quick, delete TOP! Delete! -- 22:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yet again, CUR, you demonstrate that you really don't understand how this wiki works. Two words: Goat Related. -- 22:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * First of all, it's an ibex. Huge difference. Second of all, we didn't keep Bovidae, why should we keep this? If anything, Bovidae should be restored and this added. -- 22:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * About goats, but lacks goat. Ironic, no? At what point does Dr. Doolittle's Parade of Animal Wonder end? TheoryOfPractice 22:24, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Just add it to Bovidae and be done with it. -- 22:25, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Is it at all possible you could refrain from being a tedious little shit for just a minute? -- 22:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Take that as a vote for "delete"? 22:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Immoral
Cloning is unforgivable. For when man creates life it has no soul. Only God can ensoul a living thing. These aren't alive. They're automatons. Talsley (talk) 20:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * If that's the truth, He sure does skimp on bestowing brains, though.±[[File:knightoftldrsig.png]]KnightOfTL;DR longissimus non legeri 18:49, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah you are the typical Liberal Media Elite who do blind themselves from the obvious evidence of souls and the Universal Mind. When you eventually rise in the ranks of the Media I look forward to seeing you refuted on Fox. Talsley (talk) 18:52, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Decoding Bullcrap Vocabulary:
 * "Liberal Media Elite"- you seem to hate people who are educated, possibly because the right is intensely afraid of people with critical thinking.
 * "Blind yourself"- Because I am not a stupid hack, I refuse to believe things that haven't actually been proven to be true. This seems to mean to you that I am on the same level as people who close their eyes and stick fingers in their ears and go 'la la la I won't listen to you.' Are you perhaps confusing me for yourself or one of your peers?
 * "Looking forward to seeing me refuted on Fox" This is sort of like saying that you look forward to lobotomized turd babies blowing raspberries at me and saying I have cooties. FOX wouldn't let anybody worth their salt make a complete point, much less compose themselves in order to make a coherent refutation. Unless speaking loudly like an idiot so the other person can't poison the airwaves with their coherent logic say five words is now considered a refutation.
 * Translation: "I hate people who have access to education and I don't understand how media culture works. I think you should believe things without asking me for proof and I look forward to watching blithering idiots babble like morons in a masturbatory fashion for adoring viewers who watch to have their worldviews reinforced in some kind of orgy of bad ideas."
 * ±[[File:knightoftldrsig.png]]KnightOfTL;DR lavishly loquacious 19:05, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Mind your tongue and cease using obscene words at once! Talsley (talk) 19:07, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * An incredibly ill-informed somebody is telling me to wash out my mouth with soap... on the internet. Alert the media! Oh, wait, that's me.±[[File:knightoftldrsig.png]]KnightOfTL;DR just shut up already 19:10, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You, the media? You are so full of your own arrogance that you deny Fox's cable supremacy. And you are the ill informed one, trash mouth. Talsley (talk) 23:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Fox News! It rubs you sweetly, so you'll defend it! It's like the Skinner box of television for the misinformed. Switch on, hear things that make you feel good and makes you feel right about the world, get instant ego rewards. If someone attacks it and makes you feel like all of that big, juicy reward is threatened, you'll rise to defend it, even if its newscasters babble incoherently, refuse to give anyone with half a brain five seconds to speak, act like racist idiots, or display any other evidence of its inanity and bigotry. Because it rubs you so sweetly, because it doesn't want to make you change (which is so hard for you!) and it wants to make sure you stay plonked on the couch absorbing it. It cultivates its own audience. It grooms them to keep being its audience in the face of facts. I'm sorry you're a victim. Especially when you call me arrogant for declaring that I am 'The Media.' Do you realize that you are part of 'The Media,' too?' ±[[File:knightoftldrsig.png]]KnightOfTL;DR lavishly loquacious 01:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Babble incoherently? Nonsense. Everyone gets time to speak, their are no racists, and how can I be part of the media? Talsley (talk) 01:03, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you even watch the FOX you say you watch? Have you even SEEN them, once they confront someone who isn't paid-off or a strawman, that they go "OH WHOAH WAIT OUT OF TIME THAT'S NICE LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU" like stupid playground children over even one sentence of the guest? Have you even SEEN them when they've been caught doctoring photos to make dark-skinned men 'blacker' so they can hate on them? Or does your mind bleep them out so you can keep the parts that make you feel good, the parts that rub you the right way and call you correct? News flash for the ages: news isn't supposed to conform to what pushes your buttons. Something that does is constructed utterly to keep you diddling their viewpoints, keep watching, to squeeze view-time out of you. You do realize that their agenda for the day is delivered directly from the Republican Party, right? That you're basically watching to reinforce your ego with a political, not an informative position?
 * The thing you call 'the media' isn't a single entity at all. It's a cloud of culture, a group of things that only have one thing in common: publication. As part of the internet, you're public. But you don't realize it. You may not have the same exposure as a feature film or a news venue. But you're in that cloud of culture, sleepwalking and smashing your face into walls the entire way. Basically, until you realize the internet is a public place, you're walking out into the middle of that public place naked, smeared in feces, diddling yourself, totally unaware that you're actually being watched, recorded for the ages, by more than just the media major who knows more about the media than you. ±[[File:knightoftldrsig.png]]KnightOfTL;DR more at 11 01:19, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You have a fitly disgusting mind. I blame the "anything goes" media and a lack of childhood discipline. You really believe the lies they say in a desperate attempt to deny Fox's cable superiority? That your college professor knows what he is talking about? Talsley (talk) 01:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * DECODING BULLCRAP, PLEASE WAIT...
 * "You have a filthy mind" -- Talsey is utterly afraid of metaphors that happen to be unpleasant. This might because she has no idea that FOX is porn for her masturbatory support of bad ideas.
 * "The 'Anything Goes' media" -- You mean the media that arose to entertain you? The one that conforms to the culture that you support? Don't make me laugh.
 * "Lack of childhood discipline"-- Talsey likes making shit up about people she doesn't even know or understand. She really loves saying nasty things about parents of people she's never even met. At least I insult you based on the drooling need for ego validation you so clearly display instead of invoking cheap 'your-mama' jokes.
 * "A desperate attempt" --Wow, gee, the understanding of Fox's market strategy that goes back to careful research that you're really only proving true with your desperate attempts at fingers-in-ear denial sure does sound desperate.
 * "your college professor doesn't know what he's talking about." -- Talsey is intensely frightened of education and hates people who are more qualified to make statements about topics than she is, and does not understand what a college education entails.
 * TRANSLATION: "I am afraid of you and I don't understand how my own culture works. Your mama is so stupid she didn't raise you properly. Quick, apply some dismissive statement to make me feel more confident, because I hate people who are more informed and educated than myself."
 * ±[[File:knightoftldrsig.png]]KnightOfTL;DR more at 11 01:34, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to talk to you anymore if this is the best you can provide. Talsley (talk) 01:36, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * God fucking damn it you guys. Quit with the personal attacks! Both of you! God damn. --Revolverman (talk) 01:40, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * How I do love friday night...±[[File:knightoftldrsig.png]]KnightOfTL;DR sufficiently advanced argument still distinguishable from magic 01:41, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Cow...Hammertime! 19:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Cow...Hammertime! 19:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

This talk page
Is far more interesting and full of win than the actual article. CopperheadHisssssss 01:42, 28 April 2012 (UTC)