User talk:Arp242/Frankenstein fallacy

Does this work?
I haven't found this one formalized yet, but have seen instances in the wilderness (though I cannot come up with a particular example). I'm not mad when the established people don't find this one useful or fitting, but I thought I propose it. Aneris (talk) 01:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It has my approval. ;) 142.124.55.236 (talk) 01:30, 3 November 42015 AQD (UTC)
 * +1. Although perhaps we should mention it's a RW-coined neologism Carpetsmoker (talk) 02:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Interesting that you rescue some of the articles I started. I never assumed that they were set in stone, or that the ideas really need to be their own articles, or couldn't benefit from more examples and expansions. That's fine by me. I was also merely modestly proposing them. I found somewhat astonishing the reasoning why they were removed, and the spectacle that was made out of it (somewhat because I'm familiar with the mindset). I am unclear what this has to do with the SPOV or with its own understanding. — Aneris ✻ (talk) 19:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)