Debate:This is an annoyingly long debate title and the answer is no

Proposition
If Andy Schlafly (sp?) complained to the admins here that the hit piece written about him was unkind and it ought to be removed... there's a good probability that it would be unanswered.

If complained to an evangelical church site that had a hit piece on him or her that it was unkind and ought to be removed... there's a good probability it would be answered

At the same time there's are many claims present here stating how atheists generally speaking are just as virtuous as Christians...

...doesn't that bespeak a lack of insight (aka. insanity) on the admins's part?


 * JAQing off, eh? At any rate, based on examples in the past, like the example of Falwell's reaction to Larry Flynt's low-IQ, juvenile, idiotic "jokes" "hit pieces", standard practice seems to be to Soundwave106 (talk) 20:56, 22 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Just Asking Questions is making an accusation in a tactful manner. If you insist on the tactless version: I have judged your ethics and found both them and you wanting. Your refusal to choose to be kind means that the Evangelicals are just in wishing that you burn in Hell. You deserve eternal conscious torment for taking delight in being unkind. &mdash; Unsigned, by: 2601:246:5780:C050:7CC3:3425:99ED:B561 / talk
 * Given all you've done is sealion and try to make a tone argument, I don't think we should take your anger seriously. Also, we never claim to have "virtue". Not once. Prove otherwise. Finally, if that's you Mike, it's rich to hear a guy who makes death threats concern troll over this site's tone. Toodles! 17:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * "You deserve eternal conscious torment for hurting my feeeeeewings." -dumbass BoN. 18:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)


 * What about 'all the other faiths'?
 * The IP's comments seem to be somewhat of a non sequitur - and cannot be bothered to see if a spelling is correct. Anna Livia (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)