User talk:108.176.153.211

The Block
Why exactly did this take place, I see absolutely no legitimate reason.
 * Now, I wasn't the one who blocked you, but I'm not going to argue with that decision. I'm actually here to ask you to not delete people's (via edit description clearly motivated) additions without even providing any edit summary of your changes. Deleting 250+ symbols is not a minor edit, and kind of warrants an explanation and/or discussion on the talk page of said article. Never mind when your apologist edit serves to maim perfectly good snark. Also, remember to sign your posts. Thanks in advance. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 13:44, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Ad Hominem fallacy
It seems I was called a unfunny vandal to paraquote you see, but it doesn't appear this is an actual concern of the acting sysop- instead it seems like a personal attack against me for reasons I can assume and can provide if need be, I am requesting that this person in authority be reviewed thoroughly as they seem to be keen to power abuse- unless they can explain their apparently baseless *insulting* assertions and actions they have taken against myself. I must add I certainly do hope this was not irrational hatred of BoN's' (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobia) which is honestly becoming a seemingly derogatory term lately. 108.176.153.211 (talk) 07:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Do you have a bridge in New York for sale?—Ryūlóng (琉竜 ) 07:31, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The banter is strong with you, IP.--Fat Aardvark (talk) 07:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That's a polite way of saying IP is full of shit, n'est-ce pas? I have investigated the acting sysop, and found em to be a RW editor of long and valued standing, not keen to abuse power. Now, IP 108, go away and rethink your choice of self-amusement technique. MaillardFillmore (talk) 14:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)