Thread:User talk:Blue/Thanks. bye./reply (4)

Thanks, Blue. I understand length. I'm operating with different goals, what I write is not polemic, it's experimental. I got analyzable results, and have acted on them. Since you were so kind as to explain, I'll respond:
 * At the end, on ATIM talk, I reviewed the Standard. You have experienced users who don't understand the standards, and that leads to drama. You have accurately laid out the prescribed response. It was not being followed, hence ToP's prior actions, Psygremlin's reverts, etc. (and my own support of their actions).
 * Yes, I did not understand part of the standard. I realized that and posted it. By the standards, only "vile" material may be removed, and removal of other is abuse, but users have presumptive right to police their own Talk page. JzG should not have been blocked and promoted for revert warring on his Talk page.
 * I did not recommend "action" against David Gerard. I recommended clarification of the standard. Same with JzG.
 * I only recommended action against Hipocrite. I could have removed his comments, even from his Talk page -- if they are not "vile," what is? -- but that would only have led to revert warring; I chose instead to see what the community's reaction was. I made sure that they were visible enough that inaction would indicate tolerance. Hence, in effect, the community is telling me to "fuck" my kids. That includes you and AD.
 * From past behavior, Hipocrite will mostly disappear, his target is gone. JzG will continue to beat dead horses.
 * I'm not wasting further time with the stirred cesspool, RationalWiki, beyond noticing how useful it is to see what users are really made of.