RationalWiki talk:Gamergate Sandbox

Suggestions (cross-comment from Castaigne's in progress rework of this article)
Looking over things, and carefully avoiding the controversy itself, I think this should be put more into a perspective that RW operates under. As has been stated numerous times, play by play is not needed. What it is, a brief synopsis on where/why it started, common complaints about gaming journalism, blanket description of repeated actions, and finally, possibly a brief section on ACTUAL problems in gaming journalism, or maybe how their complaints COULD be valid, and you'd have a nice, readable, concise, and friendly article for those not familiar with the topic. Take for example the Men's rights movement page. A little messy, but it shows the complaints, why they're wrong, and how they COULD be right. It's not interjecting "balance" into the discussion, but admitting there may or may not be validity in arguments there may or may not be validity in.

Another example of something very complicated, but explained (somewhat) concisely here is Libertarianism. It's explained, references some key people, but doesn't have an exhausting list of every time a libertarian wiped their ass. Trick (talk) 14:08, 2 March 2015 (UTC)