User talk:Sagan1

Sweeping changes to articles are best discussed on the relevant talk page, first-- "Shut up, Brx." 03:34, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

How it works
You can't completely overhaul an article and change its argument without prior discussion. Go to the article's talk page, and start a section addressing the specific claims you find problematic. And then wait for the editor base to chime in until consensus emerges. If you keep doing what you're doing, which is edit-warring, the article will get locked so you can't edit it, and/or your ability to edit the wiki will be curtailed. Father Vivian O&#39;Blivion (talk) 13:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Regarding your scolding.
"Well, I certainly know now why wiki is considered a bad joke! This page is a farce, a corporate hatchet job masquerading as a "rational" assessment. You should be embarrassed." -You (Emphasis mine)

We're not. Because we have nothing to be embarrassed about.

Here is an incomplete list of people that think we're serving the agenda of their enemies, in the pay of a sinister power, etc..

Figure it out. --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 14:22, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Told you.
Now the article is locked so you can't edit it. Try bringing up a cogent argument on the talk page. Father Vivian O&#39;Blivion (talk) 15:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Sagan1, in case you're unaware, this is the article's talk page. And this will let you start a new discussion on said talk page where you can raise your concerns.-- "Shut up, Brx." 15:28, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * And for the record, your arguments must consist of something other than accusing us of being corporatist animal-torturers. --|₹Λ¥$€₦₦ [[image:Red rose 02 -.jpg.svg|12px]] He ceases to be a wrongdoer. He ceases also to be a creature of moral choice. 15:37, 28 May 2014 (UTC)