Talk:Jonathan McIntosh

Pretty skimpy, questionably missional
There isn't a lot here and it's not clear what there could be. Perhaps better as a section in Anita Sarkeesian? - David Gerard (talk) 13:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I basically ran with the top of my head. There's plenty more I've got to get done on this. 16:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I shall trust you for the moment then ;-) - David Gerard (talk) 20:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not about to surf ED for arguments to fight against while at work, if you know what I mean. 20:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Turns out ED falls so hard into the "Not Even Wrong" that I can't find anything worth writing against. Gee. 02:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * A less-than-factual yet hyperlink-infested ED article? How unusual. 03:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

It's been a while since I've spent any real time there. Most of the time the humor is just so much you have to know the reference. Now that chan culture has become even more fractal than it was, its basically all-consuming and not worth my time. 03:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Does this article have missional reason to exist?
It's been nine months and I'm still not seeing it - David Gerard (talk) 21:24, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * 21:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)


 * HAAHAHAHAAHA I LIKE THAT GIF! Ahum... I agree every time i see the page in recent changes its PBfreespace3 cleaning up after some MRA.--Benaresh (talk) 22:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)