User talk:Blaze 007

Welcome
04:57, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Moved RJW
Hi,

I moved User:Blaze_007/Reactionary_justice_warrior to your userspace. The article isn't ready for mainspace yet. It doesn't have many sources and it's clearly pushing an agenda.

In addition, I'd suggest the term "Status Quo Warriors" instead -- it's got more people using it  :)  05:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

On reactionary justice warriors
For dog whistles, rhetorical appeal beats out logical appeal every time. If you're looking for a term, I suggest either "Status Quo Warrior" (rhetorically parallel to SJW) or "Radical Centrist" (very widely used + implies that their criticism of social movements is just rooted in their inability to accept change). 07:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "Radical Centrist" isn't a good term. is an actual political term doesn't mean "socially conservative". Anti sjw is more fitting as it describes them perfectly, they are anti social progress. By describing anti sjws as "Radical Centrist", it distracts from what anti sjws are about- being against social progress- and it implies that anti sjws are moderates in any form. Anti sjws are not radical centrists as they are not centrists at all. —ClickerClock (talk) 07:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Also "Radical Centrist" is a pretty unknown term. I have never heard of it before. I think using unknown terms just makes people on the fence more reluctant to join us. Alienation of beginners is a serious problem that social justice is not solving. —ClickerClock (talk) 07:13, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Statistics
Guess we are going to use "Status Quo Warrior". —ClickerClock (talk) 07:23, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Use quotes around the terms. 16:52, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Please don't edit people's comments, Blaze 007. Thanks. 21:46, 12 October 2017 (UTC)