User talk:120.148.131.196

Your recent post in "WIGO:Blogs" has been removed. The Gateway Pundit is a bottom feeder wingnut source that has linked to Diversity Macht Frei (an alt-right trash can news site) and Ann Coulter, a far-right known bigot, which is unacceptable for a blogpost, especially with your undescriptive, misleading links. Please post better entries, thanks. 02:23, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Here is a source from the Guardian (left-wing), here is the Wikipedia article on her. --120.148.131.196 (talk) 02:38, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Your entry: "Swedish Green Party politician who believed in open borders shot and beheaded in the Congo." The links you have provided say nothing about her believing in open borders. Besides, what exactly was your point?
 * By the way, this happened in March 2017, so this is not a relevant entry to add in February 2018. CowHouse (talk) 03:11, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

You are correct. These events happened last year, but the gateway pundit article was written February 2018, hence the confusion - I didn't pay close attention and so I thought this was a recent event. --120.148.131.196 (talk) 03:26, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Your WIGO entries
Some feedback: I should give you a warning that I will protect the WIGO pages if you don't improve. By the way, your entries will almost certainly receive many downvotes if you use The Daily Wire as a source. CowHouse (talk) 05:18, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Please do not spam the same story in multiple entries. It only needs to be mentioned once.
 * Do not add irrelevant entries. Events that occurred more than one month ago are not relevant (e.g. this entry from 2015).
 * Look at the edit history of a page if an entry has been commented out. You will usually find an edit summary. Don't just repeatedly restore the entry and edit war. If you disagree, write a comment on the talk page.
 * This should be a talk page comment. Don't just add your question to the entry.
 * Don't use The Gateway Pundit as a source (see here for why they are not credible, or just read our page about them).
 * Regardless of your disdain for conservative sources, the daily wire is overall a good source. Since I expected that the daily wire would not be held highly though, I provided the types of news articles that the daily wire censures - the ones that are, for lack of a better word - fawning over North Korea. This I should disturbing is It not? --120.148.131.196 (talk) 06:46, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You restored an entry again so I have protected the page for a week.
 * "Since I expected that the daily wire would not be held highly though, I provided the types of news articles that the daily wire censures - the ones that are, for lack of a better word - fawning over North Korea." You can include an example within the one entry. CowHouse (talk) 07:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)