File talk:TrTran article.png

You know, when I saw the nature of his articles, I suspected that TrTran was a parodist. This further supports my hypothesis—I mean, he had to know that some browsers wouldn't be able to read the bizarre symbols/fonts he uses, right? Regardless, this is still pretty awesome—it's about as comprehensible as Conservative's articles : )   17:53, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I have an east asian language pack installed to read Japanese and Korean, and to me they look like some kind of script, not like that. He did have to know that they wouldn't be readable to some people, though, I would think.  I'm not sure he is a parodist, though, any more than Joaquin is.--Tom Moore fiat justitia ruat coelum 18:11, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
 * If I may point you to Image:Gibberish.PNG and http://unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1780.pdf . The first is a screen capture with firefox 8 on a PC.  Note the boxes are two byte - 17 and something else in the 80 range.  Going to http://unicode.org/charts/ and typing in 1780 (one of the characters in a box) gives you the Khmer character set in the range of 1780 - 17FF. Its not gibberish, or at least the characters match what he is talking about (don't know if they are actual words, or if the words have meaning, or if the meaning is something CP wants). --Shagie 18:21, 10 July 2008 (EDT)