Talk:Hard green

Comment
while the unabomber has some connections to anarcho-primitivists, he himself has never been one and actually wrote "the truth about primitive life" as a critique of anarcho primitivism.

also, i really dont think it's fair to lable "general opposition to consumerism and shopping" as part of the hard green movement. that stament can be made to most anti-capitalist, including those who see nothing wrong with civilization, and also to a lot of mainstream environmentalists. some hippies living on a sustainable farm would probably have a general opposition to consumerism and shopping, but that doesnt mean they consider "humans solely as a polluting influence on the environment." likewise, freeganism, while again being anti-consumption doesnt mean it is anti-human. it may be an extream form of trying to limit an individuals negative impact on the planet, but that certainly doesnt equate it with being anti-human or anti-civilization. &mdash; Unsigned, by: 83.7.193.240 / talk / contribs

Thoughts on Murray Bookchin?
He was a 'green anarchist'. But from what I've heard, he was really a libertarian socialist that advocated more green stuff than say, Bakunin or Chomsky. He also really liked technology, unlike the other hard greens. But did he do or say anything hard green to be included into the hard green list? Legomania105 (talk) 07:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Human industrialization not so dangerous to nature after all?
I think that it would be quite helpful to incorporate the information in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LDGzXpei8k Skadooshbag (talk) 20:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

This page is a tragedy
Australia was burning last year. The US West Coast is burning this year. The BBC recently aired "Extinction: The Facts," which is nothing short of alarming. But apparently, RW sees it fit to sport a neoliberal critique of green movements that reads like it has been written by a climate denying neocon. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 84.2.222.161 (talk) 09:52, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * "This has virtually nothing to do with effective or sensible environmentalism and more to do with stupidity."
 * I mean, if you truly want to stan folk like Pentti Linkola, would you personally be willing to volunteer as tribute for the logical conclusion to their ideals? Colossal Squid (talk) 00:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Eco-Fascism could be it's own page
The section is large enough, and the topic distinct enough from the rest of the article to warrant its own.&mdash; Unsigned, by: 67.218.223.162 / talk
 * On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes ( ~ ) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you.
 * Feel free to create the article, you might want to start it as a draft although that’s not mandatory. Christopher (talk) 17:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

There doesn’t seem to be and authors called or nicknamed Olduvai
Unless I’m missing something, I cannot find an author called Olduvai, the article mentions “his bleak theory” which I’m assuming is this, that’s the name of the theory however it wasn’t made by a person called Olduvai. Unless I’m missing something that just seems wrong.—WMS (talk) 05:10, 7 January 2022 (UTC) Yes, that one. Richard C.Duncan was the creator. 37.35.148.242 (talk) 21:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)