Talk:Supreme Court of the United States

Stub
Looks like I have a new to-do project-α m ε σ (!) 20:55, 13 September 2007 (MDT)
 * Knock yourself out, my snarky stub was to get rrid of some red links. Hopefully I at least got what little I said right.  This article requires mention of "activist judges", though!  Oh, and those strict constructionalist fools, and original intent... but you know what you're talking about.  Glad you found it! human be in 21:14, 13 September 2007 (MDT)

Current bench
Shouldn't we just list all nine, perhaps with dates of confirmation, and a bit of snark about each one? 01:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Done and done. 04:38, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you and excellent! 05:15, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe a bit more snark ? ... smidge ? ArtifexMayhem (talk) 03:48, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * By all means. 03:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Judicial review
As I understand it, although the concept of judicial review was not new at the time, Marbury was the first time the U.S. Supreme Court used it to declare a federal law unconstitutional. 05:02, 19 May 2012 (UTC)