Fun talk:Coliberalonic

hmm, funny, but... mainspace? might be better in fun:? Ditto it's sister article, conservatipation, which should be called conservipation... human be in 16:50, 1 October 2007 (EDT)
 * I struggled with both your points. I considered that putting it into Fun would make the article into something that could be easily blown off.  While I was trying to be humorous, I do consider conservatism, like religion, to really be a mental illness.  As for conservatipation versus conservipation, I wanted the words to blend as closely as possible.  The spellings both have the ti, whereas the v is followed by an a and the p is preceeded by an i.  --Edgerunner  76 07:35, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
 * I am a year late (good ol' Special:Random), but I agree with Human that this (and conservatipation) would probably be better in Fun. Both articles are basically jokes, or at least are not very serious. --Zelandoni 00:24, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I third the motion to move into this and its sister article, the unwieldy-named conservatipation, into the funspace.  02:01, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Should I wait to move, or is this enough of a "consensus"?  02:01, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * They're fine in the conservapedia space, I think.  ħ uman  02:12, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I disagree. This article is too mediocre to rate the Conservapediaspace.  As fluff, it belongs in the funspace.   02:34, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I agree, should be funspace. 00:36, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Delete
Not really "fun" or "funny." Waaaay too short to be of use. Delete. 14:23, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh Christ. (and, indeed, Glamdring). Sophie  because liberals  14:33, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Suggestion
A 'political viewpoints as diseases (whether or not the product of conflation)' funspace page to cover all such ideas. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 14:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)