User talk:Sid/Anti-Hackery-Link-Rewrite

How do I get it to work? (haha) =.= Candlewick 18:19, 14 August 2008 (EDT)
 * One second, I think I got a better version for you. --Sid 18:20, 14 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Check this version you can copy-paste on CP. It'll work without Greasemonkey or anything. --Sid 18:24, 14 August 2008 (EDT)
 * You'll need to refresh your cache or something, though, won't you? 18:27, 14 August 2008 (EDT)
 * With the Greasemonkey script, you will need to reload some page once after saving the script. The userscript version might take a few more refreshes. --Sid 18:29, 14 August 2008 (EDT)

Peer review!
Having been deprived of my daily quota of Conservapedia, my spleen is backing up, so have a peer review for free and gratis!


 * Defining an anonymous function and then immediately calling it makes baby Jesus cry.
 * The post increment operator when you have no intention of using the result, likewise. THE CPU PIPELINE HAS RIGHTS TOO, YOU KNOW!


 * This ^ makes me yearn for the halcyon days of reviewing code from India. Meet Mr. Logical NOT operator '!', you'll be firm friends.
 * Regular expressions when what you want it a simple string match are one of the prime reasons your CPU is clocked at 2Ghz and sits at 30% usage even when you aren't using it. indexOf, sir. indexOf.
 * "blah = bluh[0]". What protocols are you expecting here other than http? Does conservapedia have a gopher interface I don't know about?
 * Using indices of an array without knowing it has that many first is bad, mmm'kay? This is why you should always learn to program in a language that rewards such behaviour with segfaults first.

Now, write on the blackboard "Software. Serious Business." 100 times and report to your house prefect for a whipping :D --JeevesMkII 19:49, 14 August 2008 (EDT)