Talk:Infancy Gospel of James

title
Since this is part of the "guide" series, it should be named in a similar fashion, I think.  ħ uman  23:06, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Yeah. Wasn't sure what to do about that.  It has 3 formal "titles", the most descriptive is "Infancy Gospel" (which is the one I learned in school, some 15 years back), teh Gospel of James, and the Protoevangellian (meaning, before the comming, before birth).  I chose Infancy, cause it's the one that tells me what is in it.  But I'm good with what ever anyone decides!--WaitingforGodot 23:10, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Perhaps we should eventually move it to "Guide to Gospel of James"? Easy enough to do, and we can leave the redirects since they might be useful.  ħ uman  23:18, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Sure. I still need to learn "redirecting", though i've mastered the art of "relocating".  I hadn't read your comments on the use of "guide" with a header, when I wrote this, so it didn't have that text yet.  --WaitingforGodot 23:25, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, when you use the "relocate" button (and move the talk page too, k?), "redirects" are automatically created from the old titles to the new ones.  ħ uman  23:33, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Ouch, not sure if "infancy" really belongs in the title? Can you throw me some random source to convince me?  ħ uman  04:25, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Anon delivers. -- 05:13, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Fine with me, thanks!  ħ uman  05:24, 17 July 2008 (EDT)