Talk:Infrasound

Inrasound is interesting and it does, without being heard, produce some weird effects on a person. I think it is on-mission. Acei9 04:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * see here. Acei9 04:52, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * And it made for an interesting point in my first Conservapedia debate so I felt like making a page about it. 04:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, personal CP anecdotes on a mainspace article isn't really article worthy however perhaps write about the above link? Acei9 04:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The article should have more references and examples. And writing in the first person is not good in a mainspace article. 04:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * There's definitely more stuff to be talked about, but it can't hurt to have a page about it, especially if it has arisen in a creationism-evolution debate. It's just good to know what people are talking about so you can refute it if you ever have to. I do have to reference it, though. I'm a science person and I was more or less writing from personal knowledge. Points about first person and anecdotes taken. 05:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This comes up quite often in NS see: The word, tigers, ghosts haunting and more ghosts.--BobBring back the hat! 10:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This is easily on-mission if we include the ghost stuff. Leave out the tigers though, too much like felidae for me. Totnesmartin (talk) 12:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

I like the idea of the page, and believe it could definitely be on-mission, but it needs something to link to it and to be more enmeshed in the wiki in general. Any ideas? Researcher (talk) 20:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Write up Ghost so it's non-crap? Totnesmartin (talk) 20:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Can link back and forth to audio woo. Some mention of the "brown note" ought to be made ;) Also needs more actual details on how YECcers/woomeisters use it to bolster their "theories", not just a random assertion that they do.  20:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * We must bring in the brown note - and can we look like a bunch of old hippies trump Wikipedia by mentioning the Edgar Broughton Band's use of the note on their first album? Totnesmartin (talk) 21:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * All of which I can do. Just busy at the moment. 21:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * And as far as the YEC stuff goes, there was more detail personal anecdotes about how it was used in the article, but it got deleted (probably rightfully so). I don't know about anybody else, but I heard it a lot growing up in a YEC-type family/church as an example of how god guides his creation, making the ark story plausible, somehow. It also reached near-meme status in a Schlafly debate I had, so I figured I'd write something about it. A lot of cool ghost stuff too. And the brown note. And maybe some of those crazy Nazi sound weapons. And maybe sonic levitation. All kinds of good, on-mission pseudoscience. 22:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * And that French scientist who got turned into a pile of goo by it. Totnesmartin (talk) 22:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Huh? 22:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

I should really consider adding more stuff to this article
Sometime soon. 03:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Why did this get deleted? I see no discussion...  21:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I nominated it for deletion when it was much lower quality than it is now. Then it got caught in a mass deletion of tagged articles. 21:52, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, ok. I see it has been resuscitated now...  22:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

The Hum
Could some reference be made to the the hum phenomenon here? .Not being medical/technical myself, but the auditory version of could apply (some people have 'active sound-hairs' in their ears others do not). 82.44.143.26 (talk) 15:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)