RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/TruthWiki

Delete

 * 1) It's a short, crappy stub that's utterly uninformative and useless. JorisEnter (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) It's missional but not widely viewed whatsoever. It's worth RW's time to focus on other sites. 15:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) We don't need articles on every single crank website in existence. We don't need articles on obscure ones like this. When I did a Google search for "truthwiki", the site didn't even turn up until the second page. Spud (talk) 15:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) It ought to be expanded, if it's missional. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 11:32, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Looks missional to me. If you don't like that it's a stub, write the rest. Flannan Isle (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Seems missional, also worth criticizing the fact that it isn't even a wiki, and you can't even make an account. KOM 20:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Goat

 * It's missional, but it's also unusably short. Frankly as it stands it's a to do list entry - David Gerard (talk) 14:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree. MarmotHead (talk) 21:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No lack of missionality - the question is, will our entry on it be reasonably and qualitatively expanded or not? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Missional, but unless someone is willing to put the time and effort into expanding it into a proper, ref.ed article, kill it off. ScepticWombat (talk) 10:22, 27 March 2016 (UTC)