Talk:Crocoduck/Archive1

Hitler pic
Why is there a hitler pic? away with it. Aceof Spades 07:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It's in the stub template & only appears in funspace.  11:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Where does this come from?
Crocoducks don't exist. They are only the product of imagination. They are intelligently designed. Products of intelligent design don't need to exist, and they don't even need to follow the laws of nature. Or even mathematics. Or even logic. See the constructions of Lewis Carroll or M.C. Escher. Real things do need to follow the law of nature, and real things exist. TomS TDotO (talk) 15:18, 28 July 2010 (UTC)


 * That's the point. If a crocoduck did exist, it would disprove evolution, and prove intelligent design/creation.  However, creationists hold it up as something we should find if evolution were true. -- 20:47, 28 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Agreed! TomS TDotO (talk) 10:25, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

They found the crocoduck!
At last, they have found a crocoduck! It looks virtually the same as what Ray Comfort wanted! What else does he want?
 * He only wants ... YOUR SOULLLLLLLLLL!!! CodeMaster9000 (talk) 04:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Move back to main?
I think that there seems to be more here than some fun and if it is cleaned up should be moved back to mainspace. 09:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree. Hell, I certainly think this "Creationist" promoted nonsense deserves some respect in our mainspace. 09:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Agree and done. It is a common enough subject among the creation/evolution "debate" (I can't even type creation/evolution "debate" without cringing...hence the ""). AceModerator 09:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * All we have to do now is notify our master of deletion that this stays where it is. 10:00, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If The Master complains we'll advise him...with a vengeance. AceModerator 10:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm under the impression that this article misses the point
Is there any sort of need for there to be a crocoduck? Who's saying that one evolved from the other? I think that should be clarified.-- "Shut up, Brx." 01:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC) -_- Evil fascist oh noez 02:21, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Mistake
Dromaeosaurs are not ancestors of birds. That's like saying humans evolved from monkeys.5.150.66.34 (talk) 13:30, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Amended to 'close cousins' and ref added. OK? Innocent Bystander (talk) 18:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Why no love for the platypus?
Considering that a combined appearance is what their "understanding" of evolution leads them to expect to see, shouldn't the aforementioned abomination noble platypus have fit their crocoduck niche? As infuriating as their intellectual dishonesty is, at least it's consistent. Jwebb (talk) 09:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

"Archosaurus"
There is no one most recent common ancestor for archosaurs; Archosaurus itself isn't even an archosaur. Wording should probably be revised to be less misleading. 75.156.69.164 (talk) 19:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Crocoducks
On a planet far, far away, the crocoducks discuss 'humans and intelligent design.' 82.44.143.26 (talk) 19:04, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

WHAT HAS SCIENCE DONE
What ever will they think of next? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Crocks and mermaids
How is the crocoduck related to the Fiji mermaid and the crab and the scorpion here  in the grand family tree of constructed life forms? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 16:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

And the chickenhawk? Anna Livia (talk) 09:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)