User:Pink/DrCB Claptrap

Protest
Sir, I must protest my treatment on this site. In my time here, I have been constantly mocked about my qualifications as a doctor(or as I'm constantly referred to, a "doctor" and recently, I was blocked, with the complaint that I was claiming some air of authority by referring to myself as a doctor and violating the 90/10 rule. As I did when Ed Poor blocked me, I will happily lay out every edit I've made to this site:


 * 2 edits to
 * 2 edits to A question which was never answered by the way
 * 1 edit to
 * 2 edits to
 * 4 edits to
 * 12 edits to
 * 14 edits to
 * 4 edits to Complete schlock, and another unanswered question.  What a pattern
 * 4 edits to
 * 7 edits to
 * 3 edits to pointing out hypocrisy, how dare I
 * 1 edit to another unanswered question
 * 2 edits to
 * 2 edits to How dare I actually discuss changes on the talk page, I should simply make whatever insane paranoid changes I feel like as you and your sysops do
 * 1 edit to
 * 1 edit to
 * 1 edit to adding a summary, something the amazing, Supreme Court arguing "lawyer" couldn't be bothered to do, as Liberal Foot in Mouth was much more pressing
 * 2 edits to Worthless page, just replace with text: Sysops do whatever they want, shut up you lowly serfs
 * 1 edit to
 * 1 edit to requesting that the blocked page be fixed....
 * 1 edit to
 * 1 edit to

That makes 49 talk posts out of 69 total.... Assuming your knowledge of mathematics is as shoddy as your knowledge of copyright laws, federal laws regarding internet vandalism and basic medical principles, that makes 71% talk, had I been in violation of 90/10 I would have 90.01% talk.

In conclusion, Andy Schlafly, I have never presumed an air of authority because I have none. I am simply a doctor in a small Denver hospital. In fact, I went out of my way to avoid the Pseudo medical nonsense plastered all over this site (gay plague indeed, control your flunkies would you?). However, I will be the bigger man and wish you all the luck in the world on this adventure. I would like to inform you, however, that if you think anyone actually consults this site as a serious reference, you are guilty of Conservative Delusion, and I'm sure you Conservative style will be to simply revert this edit unanswered and block this account for trolling/vandalism. However, you have nothing more to fear from me, "Mr." Schlafly, as I have much better uses of my time than vandalizing a web site that manages to vandalize itself. Have a good day, and I hope that someday, the Wizard gives you the courage needed to act like a true man. GOOD DAY SIR!!!!!! 18:45, 28 April 2008 (EDT)
 * PS, should you ever choose to come to Denver, I would love to meet you in open debate. You may have forgotten what that is.  It does not mean grandly proclaiming the event three days after with anonymous messages.  It means meeting another as a man and dealing with him that way.


 * LOL, you remind me of, and for the sake of that chuckle I won't block you - but do take a glance at , that's a good fellow. Cheers! -- undefined 22:12, 28 April 2008 (EDT)


 * are so long-winded! "DrCB", you managed to exhibit multiple examples of  at the same time, including inappropriate claims of authority and talking much while saying little.  FYI, the  places priority on the most recent edits, as one would expect.-- 23:40, 28 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Why do you always plug your own articles (ls) whenever insulting somebody? Authority? looks like he was putting what he is clear on the table.
 * For all our sakes, please tell us how recent in the edits does the 90/10 rule kick in? whenever a sysop feels slighted? ------ 23:57, 28 April 2008 (EDT)
 * I had told myself that I was done, and refused to comment any more on this matter... but I thought I'd return once more to point out for the world to see that the "great" "lawyer" and "Champion of 'Conservative'" fail to address any of my points. Instead, he spoke with mocking terms (liberal style OOOOOOOOO NOOOOOOOOOOO) about how liberals are long winded and claimed (again) I show signs of authority.  You also managed to completely change the rules after the game has started.  Please show anyone (not me, for I really don't care) where the 90/10 rule only applies to "recent edits" I pray that you never become a referee sir, it would be an impossible game to follow. Also note that he's really showing an overreliance on Mockery to deal with me, perhaps because his intellectual failings are so plainly exposed for the world to see (which has nothing to do with me, this whole site is the revealing force)  00:54, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

I dont think, Aschlafly, that you are in any position to judge who the authority is. How do you know who and who is not a doctor? 00:59, 29 April 2008 (EDT)


 * If they're Liberals, they're not REAL doctors. Also not real senators, professors, clergymen, presidential candidates, and so on.  NO Liberal shall be given even the slightest bit of respect for their FALSE 'achievements' on this site as long as Andrew Schlafly, Esquire  continues to draw breath!  Fnord.  -- 02:25, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
 * "If they're Liberals, they're not REAL doctors. Also not real senators, professors, clergymen, presidential candidates, and so on." - I have blocked you for intolerance.  02:42, 29 April 2008 (EDT)

Is anyone going to block Doctor CB? 01:35, 29 April 2008 (EDT)


 * Why should they?  He said he wasn't coming back.  If he does, it'll just prove he's using . -- 02:25, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
 * He actually did come back after he said that. 02:42, 29 April 2008 (EDT)