Category talk:Physics-related stubs

A Question
Since these are stubs, you'd like someone to expand them, right? Would that fall in RW's mission? (And maybe this is a stupid question but...if we think the articles we have now are good enough, why don't we just remove the stub labels from them?) -- Andy not Schlafly 11:35, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
 * A good question. We have a load of non-mission stubs which are better answered at ToW. In my view we need only focus on the ones for which we can add some on-mission slant which is not otherwise covered by WP. The rest need to be pruned out. Don't forget the mantra "we are not an encyclopedia". Генгис silverbrain.png 11:42, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Centralized page or vote as we go? Тy Bother me 17:40, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * A centralized page would probably focus people's minds more. Генгис silverbrain.png 17:45, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Forumspace ok? Тy Bother me 17:46, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * A lot of them can be expanded and I fail to see how physics could be off mission. While I know we are not an encyclopedia we are also a group of people very much interested in science. Acei9 00:53, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Science also encompasses biology, chemistry, astronomy, geology...  Sam   Tally-ho!  02:48, 2 November 2012 (UTC)