User talk:Judge Dredd

Invalid nomination
Talking to myself... must be nuts... oh well 03:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

You may recall…
Adolfus James: But your honor, I didn't. Judge Dread: Hush up, guilty or not guilty? Adolfus James: Not guilty, sir. Judge Dread: I don't care what you say, take four hundred years. Stand down. Bongolian (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Question?
I am wondering if you have a question for me. Use my talk page if you like. Thanks.Ariel31459 (talk) 19:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Mod election
Hi there, I see that you are on the list of OpenSTV ballot readers for the 2020 mod election. I've received the results from David, have run them through the process, and am getting ready to post them. Would you like me to send you the raw results file so you can verify my calculations? —cosmikdebris talk stalk 01:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern
You're handing the sysop right to people like candy. This might be a bad idea because you might give it to some disgruntled troll by accident. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 16:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You are new here, let me explain how this works. RationalWiki has as of time of writing, one thousand one hundred and twelve sysops. The role of a sysop on RationalWiki, unlike other wiki projects, is that of a 'trusted' user. The Staff, Moderators, and Techs are between themselves a closer analogue of the Administrators or 'Sysops' on other wiki projects. The majority of Sysops on RationalWiki are trolls, sockpuppets, and friends of editors; multiple banned users maintain known sockpuppet accounts with Sysop rights, that cannot be blocked merely as convincing evidence is lacking. It's tradition to Sysop new users as soon as feasible, with the only barrier, the partial responsibility you take over those who you give the right. If for any reason a Sysop goes insane, there is no damage that cannot be undone within a few moments. In short, your concern is misplaced. Judge Dredd (talk) 02:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Your recent block
What made you so sure? Christopher (talk) 15:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Easily identifiable editing patterns. Judge Dredd (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Delete Smith's articles
Hello, please see this. You have commented before on how these articles need to be taken down, so I'm sure you would agree with me. Oenophyta (talk) 01:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I am the only reason his 30+ articles remain here, I argued strongly in favour of inclusion, regarding his mainspace work. The aforementioned articles are largely fabricated hit pieces sure. That is why it would be unfunny to delete them. Judge Dredd (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Making your ban official

 * --Andrew5 (talk) 01:51, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * We don't invite doxers back to dispute their bans. Bongolian (talk) 02:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I wasn’t inviting this loser to dispute his ban, notice I did not unblock him. I’m surprised it took this long for this cocksucker to get banned for doxing; not only was he almost as bad as Oxyaena about false-positive blocks, I distinctly recall him posting off-wiki shit about Mike and DMorris that I thought was borderline doxing but I wasn’t going to come to the defense of the trolls. King Bowser K. Rool (talk) 03:20, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You put up the coop message on his talk page ("Feel free to comment."), which is like an invitation. That's what I meant. Bongolian (talk) 03:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)