User talk:Purebread

Kool Quotes

 * No matter how much poor-quality evidence you have, it does not aggregate into a single piece of good-quality evidence. You can stack cowpies as high as you want; they won't turn into a bar of gold. When you hear lots of stories that are supported by dubious or nonexistent evidence, no matter how many there are, you have good reason to be skeptical.

Bradford
I have moved the page back to your userspace, as the formatting was not anywhere near that of what RW articles should be. You should probably have a look at the welcome template on the top of this page and read all the links in there.--JorisEnter (talk) 09:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Your statement "not anywhere near that of what RW articles should be" is not very helpful. I have read a lot of RW articles.
 * True it is not a debunking article
 * I think an article of WASP origins is appropriate for RW, because if debunking right wing is done it should be done with historical perspective. RW purpose number 3 = explore fundamentalism, or I have lost my ability to read correctly?
 * Could you list your beefs? Was the artcle interesting?
 * Would you be happier with this article in the essay space?  Purebread   Just * another godbotherer  13:40, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Userpages
Most people aren't exactly fond of others messing with their userpage.--JorisEnter (talk) 14:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Got it. Your welcome, how about the intent?

Thanks
Much thanks for not moving my article Essay:William Bradford the governor from where it is!