User talk:174.91.116.96

I reverted your change to Dunning-Kruger effect
I didn't do it because I thought it was necessarily bad, but because it was badly formatted, and I couldn't figure out what you were trying to say well enough to fix it. Will you provide a more clear explanation on the talk page? ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 18:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for being a reasonable adult, and I figured that my edit would be taken down quite quickly. As long as one person had the chance to read it (aka You) and I have made the ones involved think about what I have said and to do their own scholarly research then I am glad. I do not wish to be callous, only that people understand that this website can be so, as well as ignorant to much of what science and facts has to offer. No need to fix what I've said, you can leave it out. Just understand that much of the facts laid out in my previous edit are subjects to think long and hard about. Millions suffer, children die as a result of pollution and climate change and it is unfortunate to see it dismissed by many as people are dying, and as the planet becomes more at risk. We can no longer frame this as a debate. It is fact. Its happening. That is more important than playing for team red or blue, or how either sides representatives truly represent their ideas of governing; the planet. If you care enough, do the research and help to fix what is incorrect about this website.&mdash; Unsigned, by: 174.91.116.96 / talk / contribs