Talk:Golden age

I see that we now have nostalgia and Good old days. I'd say that this one has the best title and the others should redirect to this.--BobSpring is sprung! 13:30, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. -- 14:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * yes, then we can talk about how good the other two were. Totnesmartin (talk) 14:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sir, I salute your grasp of this subject! -- 14:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I think they make a nice little clustrifuck of snarticles and would miss any two of them if they were gone. 22:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * At least merge "good old days" with this one. There's probably a case for keeping nostalgia separate, if it can be about the concept & psychology of nostalgia, & appeals to nostalgia in politics etc., & this one can be about common examples of perceived "golden ages".  22:13, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I think the ga and god are different enough to stay distinct. Ga can be thousands or millions (!) of years ago, but god implies living people waxing nostalgic about a time they remember, or at least think they do.  As I said, I think they are a sweet little triumclustate.  Tome to make sure they all "see also" each other...  02:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * But GA & GOD both cite the age of chivalry as an example. . .  02:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Then one of them must be wrong. I'd say god.  04:32, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Also GA says: "In its most reduced form, it can be seen in an inclination to think fondly of "the good ol' days","--BobSpring is sprung! 07:13, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * But you are a known hobosexual. So your opinion here counts for twelve.  07:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * A very profound outsight.--BobSpring is sprung! 07:44, 28 March 2010 (UTC)