Fun talk:Citizendium FAQ

Best of Amusement
I here humbly nominate this FAQ for Best of amusement. Why? Any objections? --Ray's Super Fun Hellhole! g͘͡r̸̀a̸̶̡n̶̶͜ţ̡ ̀҉̴̨͡m̀͘͜͢e͡ ̸͟҉̷̢ỳ̸̡̀͞ơ̡̢̡ų̧r̴̀͡͝ ̡҉҉̧̛s̵̕͏̡ǫ̀́͢ų́l̵̕҉ 20:58, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * It's accurate: It concisely represents every single reason for the total failure that is CZ.
 * It works really well as a critique: And it is not subtle about it at all.
 * It's funny. Of course, above all.
 * Wheee! Paragraph labelling is fun.


 * Hey, why not. A bit inside-baseball, but hey - David Gerard (talk) 10:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Go for it. I love this page. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 10:18, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * BoA'd. --Ray's Super Fun Hellhole! g͘͡r̸̀a̸̶̡n̶̶͜ţ̡ ̀҉̴̨͡m̀͘͜͢e͡ ̸͟҉̷̢ỳ̸̡̀͞ơ̡̢̡ų̧r̴̀͡͝ ̡҉҉̧̛s̵̕͏̡ǫ̀́͢ų́l̵̕҉ 20:23, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

The justification and prospects of the project § Are you against pseudonymity or anonymity in general?
I couldn't think of anything witty to put there (it comes after "Why make a special role for experts?"). Someone else have something to put there? —Kazitor, pending 06:57, 6 July 2017 (UTC)