User talk:KingWill473

As far as I'm concerned if an entry is blatantly false it should be removed. If it turns out I'm wrong, just add a note to the entry. RoninMacbeth (talk) 18:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Clinton uranium article
Hello, the link you removed was from an article recently published with new informstion pertaining to the Clinton uranium Russia matter, whereas the snopes article was, as you said, several months old. --101.181.118.62 (talk) 05:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The Snopes article has been updated.
 * CowHouse (talk) 05:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away. We hope you enjoy your newfound  ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ  &mdash; and these external tools:
 * Rbutr shows user-submitted rebuttals to your current webpage.
 * Google Scholar Button (Chrome, Firefox) searches your highlighted text in Google Scholar. Easily check academic citations!
 * web.archive.org and archive.is can save permanent copies of webpages. Never lose a crank website or racist Tweet ever again! Christopher (talk) 17:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Poll number
I noticed that you've added the poll number "178198" to new entries on WIGO:World twice. I'm not sure why you're doing this, but can you please follow the number of the previous entry. Thanks. CowHouse (talk) 15:25, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Not sure why that happened. I just clicked the "vote nextpoll" link as instructed.  Sorry about that.  I'll check next time.--KingWill473 (talk) 15:30, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the explanation. By the way, your signature doesn't need to have parentheses around it. CowHouse (talk) 15:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Haha yeah, just realized that. Holdover from my Wikipedia days.--KingWill473 (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC)