User talk:BuckledDegree

JorisEnter (talk) 21:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Ya turkey
Reverend Black Percy (talk) 05:45, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

In future
In future, you can block users who are doing repetitive stupid things like A. B. was doing. They usually go away after that. Bongolian (talk) 05:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

How do I do that, though? BuckledDegree (talk) 05:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)


 * I have given you Sysop privilege. You should be able to block people now. Please use the power with discretion. You can for example look at the Special:RecentChanges page or the "Fossil record" link from a specific page for block links. Bongolian (talk) 08:21, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Sysop
Bongolian (talk) 08:21, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Groxxing
I see somebody named Groxxing put a bunch of stuff on my Talk page and you promptly reverted it. Thanks for doing that for me--what was that anyway, vandalism, MRA bullshit, or what? Peyre (talk) 17:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

69.178.193.6 banned for doxxing
Why? 11:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

He/she posted some kind of address, zip code and everything BuckledDegree (talk) 15:41, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

The nature of spam
Hi, you reverted my edits to the southern poverty law center and 'whats going on in the clogosphere' and then blocked me for "Spam". How were my edits spam? --101.181.57.232 (talk) 03:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello? Any answer? --101.181.57.232 (talk) 04:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The article you listed on WIGO Clogs and the SPLC page was identified by Media Bias/Fact Check as a right-wing source with mixed reporting. Given that fact, I reverted those edits. BuckledDegree (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * What about the other eight sources I used? And even if the sites were all identified by media bias/fact check as "right wing sources with mixed reporting", that does not mean by definition they were wrong about this. Do you have any sources that refute or cast doubt at the accusation levelled at the splc? --101.181.57.232 (talk) 03:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Dude, you also cited the Daily Wire, Daily Caller, New American, The Federalist, and even freakin' Breitbart as your sources. I also took a cursory look at the Catholicism.org page and the parent org it's under turns out to be a traditionalist Catholic sect. I don't think they count as legitimate sources by any sense of the word, at least according to RW's standards. BuckledDegree (talk) 04:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, the Daily Wire is a great source. If they are such egregious sources, how easy it will be for you to show me sources that refute or cast doubt on them. I could go onto google and find a few more sources stating what the aforementioned sources have claimed. --101.181.57.232 (talk) 05:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Alt-lite
I'm sorry... but who is this "Alt-lite"? 2d4chanfag (talk) 21:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * It's essentially a separate faction of the alt-right that rejects the (overtly) anti-Semitic elements and embraces everything else, albeit in dog whistles. To put it in analogy, if alt-right is Coca-Cola, alt-lite is Diet Coke. Same thing, different flavor. BuckledDegree (talk) 21:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * LOL that sould be the RationalWiki alt-lite version. 2d4chanfag (talk) 05:58, 21 October 2017 (UTC)