Thread:User talk:Blue/Thanks. bye./reply

Abd, I took the time and read through your treatise and assessed your claims as best I could. Playing the judge, I asked you to clarify some points and to be concise. You then wrote another treatise, which I duly read, but you did not follow my advice about being concise. I was left frustrated and at a loss about what to do.

For your future reference:

First, "encouraging users to violate standards" is not and has never been actionable as "abuse."

You also completely fail to understand the way we respond to deletion of talk page material. Deletion of material from a user talk page is presumed to not be abuse. The burden is on whoever posted the deleted material to sue for the restoration of the material. If a suit ever went to vote, the following three outcomes are possible:


 * 1) The material is affirmed as "vile" and further action may be taken against the plaintiff for trolling.
 * 2) The case is dismissed as frivolous.
 * 3) The material is restored and further action may be taken against the defendant(s) for abuse.

The third possibility is definitely not assumed.

Finally, you need to understand that the length of your posts is a direct obstacle to anyone actually engaging you in a discussion, let alone taking action on your recommendations. And without a discussion, things don't get done here, at least with regard to abuse cases. You can bemoan that all you want, but it is a cold, hard fact.