Thread:User talk:Armondikov/Someone who gets it!/reply (2)

Well, my point was more directed toward the "meta-discussion" where you don't get to define terms. No matter how strictly you define "climate change," denialist partisans will just substitute "evil watermelon conspiracy" in for the phrase. If you look at most of the denialist output (as well as some of the anti-corporate hard green stuff), it's screamingly obvious that the "debate" has nothing to do with climate science, but with capitalism and the role of the market in modern society. Screamingly obvious to me, at least, but some people still seem not to have caught on to this.