Conservapedia talk:Sysop and Admin Abuse

Gang
Think they wiped off their puny cocks and went about their business afterwards?
 * God, what a bunch of fucking weasels. As if no one could see this? I saw the beginning of that exchange yesterday--when DP asked RobS to fix New Ordeal, which his tiny brain can't comprehend. (Too busy fighting the aliens, I suppose)  Flippin ;-) 11:07, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Hmm...what does "DP" stand for...?70.225.217.155 11:08, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Sorry, DoggedPersistence who was immediately blocked for, basically, disagreeing with RobS  Flippin ;-) 11:15, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Oh, I was thinking something much dirtier--PalMD-yada yada 11:23, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * It says "sock of Hmmmm". is that meant to be human? I'm gonna try to find that journal which supposedly contains the term ( New Ordeal) in the college library (if it was published in the British Isles it will be there), i'll fill you in if and when...αιρδισΗταλκ 11:21, 12 June 2007 (CDT)

Locked!
Wow, I just saw that the page has been locked. Amazing. αιρδισΗταλκ 11:27, 12 June 2007 (CDT)


 * Given that the rules, or guidelines, or some rumour or something states that in the final analysis users are to do whatever sysops tell them to regardless of Commandments and so forth, then by definition it's impossible for a sysop to break the rules. Therefore, no need for an abuse page! --Kels 11:35, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Wow. You finally figured that out. I thought it couldn't be more plain


 * Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks
 * This a guideline. It has received approval from senior staff and Mr. Schlafly. It is an adjunct to the Commandments.
 * Sysop's and Bureaucrats are the Administrators of Conservapedia. Their instructions, as to Conservapedia policy and/or the appropriateness or inappropriateness of user actions, are to be followed. Failure to do so will result in the user being blocked. RobS 12:00, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * I'm just surprised none of you see a fallacy in that. Oh, and check our page on your crazy New Ordeal page.  Flippin ;-) 12:02, 12 June 2007 (CDT)

<--Next time we might just delete Conservapedia:Sysop and Admin Abuse just for the giggles. RobS 12:02, 12 June 2007 (CDT) (moved from main page to talk)  Flippin ;-) 12:03, 12 June 2007 (CDT)


 * So this is a de facto admission that the page is just an excuse to jerk the editors around? Wow, that's encyclopedic. --Kels 12:19, 12 June 2007 (CDT)


 * Obviously if you're complaining you're liberal and shouldn't be on the site. Have some Kool-aid, it'll help this all make sense. Jrssr5 12:20, 12 June 2007 (CDT)


 * This Kool-Aid tastes funny. Oh well, it's free.  *quaffs* --Kels 12:22, 12 June 2007 (CDT)


 * There's not much you can do with Fundamelon Blast ... I've tried adding vodka, but it still has a bad aftertaste. Jrssr5 12:29, 12 June 2007 (CDT)

Update
This section, an adjunct to Conservapedia Commandments, has been repealed. nobsViva la Revolución! 04:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That seems like an improvement! It sounds a lot like Ed-Poor-esque language, though - he may not like the change.  Well, he doesn't like any change that wouldn't allow him to reign as a genial autocrat in his authoritative "I've been on wikis for super long now do this writing plan or you can't contribute" way.  Bravo!-- 05:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Not quite the same
but did you see this bit of fluff from our pal Karajou ?  Flippin ;-) 11:38, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Lucky for them that any press is good. This should be interesting. Jrssr5 11:44, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Should anyone from RW contact her? Maybe someone who's previously been active on CP before getting banned, like Dr. Pal. --Kels 11:48, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * I sent her an email immediately, waiting to see if I get a reply. Also, gave her the site link. Did put her contact info on Pal's talk page  Flippin ;-) 12:01, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * I emailed her...we'll see.--PalMD-yada yada 12:25, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Responding to her now  Flippin ;-) 12:36, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Hmmm--very interesting...Sterile 13:15, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * I emailed her, too -- shoulda realized I wouldn't be the only one with that idea. Ah well, hope she takes it as a sign of interest, not of us hounding her. --jtl talk 13:58, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * As long as she doesn't look at this, we're ok.--PalMD-yada yada 14:00, 12 June 2007 (CDT)


 * 1) The New Ordeal by Planning, John Jewkes, Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1968. RobS 14:35, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 * I think I should just tag everything with Robs's bullshit answer  Flippin ;-) 14:01, 12 June 2007 (CDT)

It's replacing my sig. --The New Ordeal by Planning, John Jewkes, Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1968.


 * Did you know that book completely explains the New Ordeal and how it pertains to US history? Brilliant reading. Jrssr5 14:04, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Did you know, it also tells the exact location of David Blaine's secret hidden treasure?  Flippin ;-) 14:09, 12 June 2007 (CDT)

I'm starting a pool
GregLarson has come under scrutiny of certain sysops out patrolling for wandals. How long until he's blocked?

I have dibs on 30 minutes from the time of this post. C®acker 21:02, 12 June 2007 (CDT)


 * God. The talk page is an exercise in idiocy.


 * This easily wins the prize for the most pathetic interrogation ever. With a bonus prize for the double-team of paranoid sysops who possibly did a GREAT job at scaring an innocent dude away from CP. --Sid 21:13, 12 June 2007 (CDT)
 * "Carry on" here means, "Go ahead and EDIT something....I dares ya . C®acker 21:18, 12 June 2007 (CDT)