Talk:Eric Dondero

I'm done
Dondero has been trolling the internet for 20-years so there's a lot more stuff that can be dug up and added by other users if they want to add to what I wrote. MrYellow (talk) 21:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Revert
No valid reason for revert - I added Eric Dondero's most recent Twitter account after his other accounts were suspended.

https://twitter.com/dondero_e/ Solu (talk) 19:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * “Shit source, poor writing, no one gives a fuck about Twitter drama.” sounds like a perfectly good set of reasons to me. Christopher (talk) 19:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Most of the content in question is "he's saying racist shit on Twitter". Firstly, how is that specifically trolling? Sure, it's openly racist shit on Twitter, but how does that behavior fit the category of trolling? Second, why does this warrant its own section instead of a brief sentence noting that he's now active on Twitter again? Thirdly, why are we sourcing from a Miraheze wiki? We might as well source from Fandom/Wikia for all the quality control we'll get. 19:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Not here to bump into the argument, but the definition of trolling put simply is "An action done on purpose that is intended to annoy" like vandalism can be a form of trolling. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 21:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

GrammarCommie
GC has a long history of reverting people without valid reason; here's some past complaints on his talk-archive -


 * dude, stop reverting or I'll make a coop case to de-sysop and block you
 * "you reverted a legitimate edit without giving the person making it due consideration, even after he came to your page to complain about it, until I made such a big deal out of it that another mod, Christopher, got involved and forced you to defend your statements"
 * Stop reverting my edits without reason/merit
 * Your reverts
 * Why was my post reverted
 * Why are you reverting stuff that isn't vandalism or trolling?

etcetc. There's like dozens more complaints and I didn't even get through looking all the archives. Solu (talk) 19:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If it makes you feel any better, I could revert you instead next time you try to add it back in. The content you added wasn’t that good, the person who spotted that fact first is irrelevant. If you want to defend it, defend it on its own merits; you could rewrite it a bit and then post it here on the talk page. Christopher (talk) 19:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)