File talk:Foucault5.jpg

Actually, this is. As on WP fair use may be acceptable as long as it is ONLY used on the one page. (full attribution should be made,however.)--Scream!! (talk) 01:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not so much that it's only used on the one page, but that each individual use has its own fair use rationale - which you find on the talk pages. RW is unfortunately lax on this, as FU rationales are on the file, but that's less of a problem because more often than not fair use images are only ever uploaded for one single purpose. ADK ...I'll mature your US Navy aircraft carrier! 01:55, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * You might have even less a problem with this.Civic Cat (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

I know what this pic is supposed to be, but when Brxbrx uses it in his sig, it's so tiny that it looks like a fat cartoon mole with sunglasses on. Which is how I imagine Brxbrx looking now. 04:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Penfold from Danger Mouse. (Under copyright, but at least it's funny).  20:51, 19 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I thought it was some sort of rat. ArchieGoodwin (talk) 04:05, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Good thing -- Foucault deserves better. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 04:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Copyright
We ever get that worked out? ArchieGoodwin (talk) 03:16, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't think so. The fair use template is innacurate if he's using it in his sig. Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem 03:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Sooooooo... ArchieGoodwin (talk) 03:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete.  03:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Not looking forward to any fallout from Brxbrx.   03:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I like your suggestion above. ArchieGoodwin (talk) 03:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I was gonna turn in early, but I might stay up late for the fireworks. P-Foster Talk " "Santorum is the cream rising to the top." " 03:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * What fireworks?  03:33, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh this is good. 03:38, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

You people are pathetic-- 03:32, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you people?
I mean, what the fucking fuck is your problem? Do you have nothing better to do than to try and spite me? You're trying to drive me away. Okay. But why? Because I hold some people on this site accountable to their actions? Because I've on occasion lost my temper and said some things I shouldn't have? I hope you're not all like this in real life. Get off my back. Grow up. --Brxbrx 03:46, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * People dislike you because you're a worthless piece of shit. Hope this helps you understand why not one single person on this website will miss you when you're gone. 03:49, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I may be worthless, but you're the piece of shit. You're just bitter because I called you out on your bullshit, and tried to make it so people like you can't walk around the place acting like douchebags.  You're a Klansmen disappointed to see the passing of the Civil Rights Act.  Except thanks to you and yours, meaningful reform on RationalWiki has been completely shut down.  So congratulations, it's still your circle jerk.  You, Ace, Human, and company can sit around mutually masturbating each other, congratulating each other on how smart you all are, brag about how much alcohol you drink, and forcing anybody whom you dislike into eating the ookie cookie--Brxbrx 18:35, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Fuck you. You never called me out on shit except deciding you didn't like me or what I stand for from the beginning of your odious presence here. Lol. Bitch. 18:56, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Brx, if you've got issues with something somebody's said or done to you, take it up with them. Insulting the whole community without even saying what you're so pissed about won't get you any sympathy.  07:45, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Because you were repeatedly using a copyrighted picture for a signature? Yeah, it's totally the whole community that's in the wrong, not you. Grow up and move out of the basement. Scarlet A.pngbomination 09:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Going to use this one more time...

"Shut up, Brx." Osaka Sun (talk) 10:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * QED--Brxbrx 18:35, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * On Facebook I totally call people out when they post nonsense like this. -- Seth Peck (talk)
 * No Vaguebooking here. Brxbrx is pissed because the pirated Foucault image that he used in his signature got vaped, and he's taking it as evidence that the whole community hates him for no good reason. P-Foster Talk " "Santorum is the cream rising to the top." " 16:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * It's grossly unfair to say we hate him for no good reason. We hate him for a perfectly good reason - that he's a twat. Sophie  because liberals  17:03, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, yeah, of course. But vaping the image had nothing to do with the hate. He just sees it that way. P-Foster Talk " "Santorum is the cream rising to the top." " 17:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Whether or not the community hates me, and whether they hate me aside, the deletion of this particular image was quite obviously done out of spite. Why weren't any if these deleted?  Why just the one I was using?  Not to mention that it was Archie Goodwin that brought it up, and the edit summary he left in a subsequent edit to that talk page is rather telling.  And I've been getting a lot of unwarranted abuse, most apparently with the Template:Brx, and nobody has stepped in to assist me (why should they?  Because this wiki is about refuting pseudoscience, not pissing on brx)--Brxbrx 18:35, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * -- il' Dictator   Mikal  18:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I, for one, agree with Brx. You're all a bunch of cock-juggling asshats. Occasionaluse (talk) 18:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)