Talk:Evolutionary developmental biology

Yet another
Yet another general science article with a "this is actually on-mission, honest" paragraph about creationism. Sophie Wilder  16:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Evo-devo is very important, if it actually had been accepted over 60 years ago instead of denied by most scientists, there would probably be little creationists today. Forests (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * It may well be important, but this isn't an encyclopedia. Sophie  Wilder  16:39, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * "without that quote, people wont understand the importance of evo devo" - they can read it in the citation, can't they? There's no need to fill up the article with cut'n'paste wodges of text. Sophie  Wilder  16:46, 9 December 2012 (UTC)