User talk:Abortionismurder

"...but it's murder in self-defense." -- J. R. "Bob" Dobbs

Bullshit name dude. Locke   Always Watching...... 01:25, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Yes, considering you wouldn't support the political philosophy of John Locke, I agree, you have a bullshit name.
 * I bet you can say this with a 95% certainty as well. Locke [[Image:Eye.jpg|10px|User is Vandal/sysop]]  Always Watching...... 01:39, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Abortionismurder 01:30, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Hey... if you're here to troll... bye... but we'd encourage you to make an essay/article about why abortion is murder. But I'm going to revert the other articles.- 01:36, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * What other articles? Abortionismurder 01:38, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * You know the "essay". Locke [[Image:Eye.jpg|10px|User is Vandal/sysop]]  Always Watching...... 01:39, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Oh, I didn't realize that was an essay. Yeah, the essay namespace is more or less inviolate, so have a ball- 01:39, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Thanks. You're not a pig.  Abortionismurder 01:40, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

I'm very much pro-choice, but the essay space is for people to speak their minds. You're speaking it, that's for sure.- 01:42, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * I guessed you were pro-choice. But for admitting that as an essay it is inviolate, you're not a pig.  Abortionismurder 01:43, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Er, no one has said anything about inviolate..... 01:44, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * It's pretty close. But not sure certain.  True.  Also, oink.- 01:44, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * See above. Abortionismurder 01:44, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Miscarriage is a sad waste of human potential. It should be outlawed. human be in 02:25, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Good night
Abortion==Forever lost potential. Abortionismurder 02:11, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Hi blastocyst-lover! How do ya feels about Bush vetoing the SCHIPS bill?  (them's live babies!) By the way, the abortions I have been a party to were saved potential.  How would you know the situation in other people's lives well enough to force them to be incubators of parasites? human be in 02:25, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Hello, Moloch worshiper. Who forced them to be incubators?  Nature?  The decision to copulate?  The trust in birth control?   Abortionismurder 10:17, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Entirely true! Just think, at this very moment, some mother could be aborting the next Hitler! --SockOfGulik 13:39, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

How many cells...
...does the (insert term here) have to be (one, two, four, etc.) before it's murder? --Edgerunner  76 07:44, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * How many kids have you adopted? All those neglected, alive children in the world! VirileSterilepie chart? 09:19, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Now, we don't want to adopt neglected children. Abort them.  Proactively or retroactively.  Gas chambers, buddy.  Death is better than neglect, right?  Abortionismurder 10:15, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Most are malnourished and don't get the emotional support that they need. So, are we to take a blind eye to those children?  Why all the concern for a potential human but not for a real, living one?  Or are those potential children more sacred some how that I can't perceive? VirileSterileyawn! 11:13, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

That argument is extremely flawed and I say that as someone who is pro-choice. Abortionismurder doesn't necessarily not care about alive people just because he hasn't (or for all we know he has) adopted someone. Maybe he has or maybe it's not feasible for him? Comments like this are polarizing. Comments that assume all pro-lifers to be pure conservatives who buy into their fiscal agenda are also very polarizing and I've seen those everywhere. People automatically assume a pro-lifer is against social welfare programs that benefit children. People also assume they are automatically religious and against contraception. But a person is capable of being pro-life without fitting these stereotypes, so we make the pro-choice side look dumb an awful lot with the sorts of rebuttals that have become popular. If we want to be effective at protecting Roe we have to consider how the people on the fence will respond to the things we say.98.209.57.51 (talk) 13:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Check the source at the article. Hope this helps. Abortionismurder 11:43, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * So far this year: Deaths due to nutritional deficienceis:  367,713
 * So far this year: abortions:  34,937,670
 * So far this year: Deaths due to lack of emotional support:  Not listed
 * Sources?
 * US, international? After all, your abortion stats are international?
 * I'm still waiting for your excuse, as well, for not adopting any children. Do you have a ♥ of lead or something? VirileSterileyawn! 13:24, 5 October 2007 (EDT)


 * How many of those 34,937,670 abortions were at or before the "still looks like a chicken" stage? My guess is the vast majority.  I'm not asking to be funny.  I just can't get broken up about an abortion when it is in those early stages.   --Edgerunner  76 13:39, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Please consider a name change
Abortionistheslaughterofinccocenthumanbeingsfornoreasonatallexceptthemotherdidnotwanttheprecioushumanchild was already taken (and blocked). You might like Fetiarepeopletoounlessyouripthemoutoftheirnaturalenvironmentthentheyarejusttrash. I think FellatioSucks is still open too. CЯacke ® 10:57, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * But fellatio doesn't suck, it's a great birth control technique.- 11:01, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

(As a protein source it's overrated. - take my word for it. Susan  talk to me  22:30, 5 October 2007 (EDT))
 * Of course. But as birth control technique, it can slow down even the most inseminary jackass... human be in 22:43, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Fellatio does too suck, (if you do it rightly) and yes no fetuses gets whacked unless one is in the habit of carrying human ova in one's mouth during and after the act of fellaltio. CЯacke ® 11:09, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Ah, but it's the death of sperm. Aren't sperm potential life?  Every sperm is sacred... you know. -Smyth 12:42, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Two and a half questions for Murder, here:

 * 1) You're male, yes?
 * 2) You're religious, yes?
 * 2a. What's your take on the Doctrine of Infant Damnation?

--SockOfGulik 13:40, 5 October 2007 (EDT)