User talk:OurMike

Yay, good to see you here. -Smyth 11:32, 12 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Well, look who's here!75.62.26.190 12:00, 12 October 2007 (EDT)


 * Hello and welcome.--Bob's your uncle 19:03, 12 October 2007 (EDT)

Morning all. OurMike 05:23, 13 October 2007 (EDT)

You are a very patient man. Don't let TK get to you; you should take a look at Conservapedia:Schlafly Rearguard 67.159.45.52 19:11, 13 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Good work on the Dawkins page. I was backing you up but I just got blocked for it. :-(  --Bobbing up 12:53, 21 November 2007 (EST)

Fascinating stuff on CP's Dawkins talk page. I don't know how you have the patience. It's like pushing on a rope. Ajkgordon 17:18, 22 November 2007 (EST)

You're here! :D
Just saw your stuff on the Dawkins talk page. Hot damn, it's amazing what a few idiots can cook up when they work together... and have blocking rights.

Loved the part where Ed apparently claimed that those FOI replies mean nothing. I guess that we'll have to have the Oxford main dudes bring those documents straight to Ed's doorstep! --Sid 13:48, 6 April 2008 (EDT)


 * Thanks. Though mere *documents* hardly count as proof. Where is the evidence that such documents accurately record events as they occurred? Ed's point is sound. The burden of proof is on Oxford, and unless and until at least a majority of the Law Lords in the House of Lords, the US Supreme Court, and the Constitutional Tribunal of Thailand, rule in favour of Dawkins holding a professorial title it seems perfectly reasonable to assume he does not. OurMike 06:24, 7 April 2008 (EDT)