User:Darth Tiktaalik

social media
Friendica: https://nerdica.net/profile/darth_tiktaalik

Note that Friendica accounts can be followed and communicated with from external sites that federate such as those running mastodon or another friendica instance. You don't have to sign up to nerdica specifically

religious nonsense
Creationists' assertions that religion is the cure for bigotry and evolution is the root cause are well, less than accurate:

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:Darth_Tiktaalik/notes_on_racism_and_evolution

Paul Price of Creation Ministries International responded to a redditor on /r/debateevolution who pointed out the evidence is against the creationist position:

To which paul responds:

In his rush to defend creationism as science he reveals the entirely unscientific attitude of modern creationists. Science owes it's success in large part to the fact that it can accept that a past belief set of the community is false and throw it out but Paul is arguing for current legitimacy based on past belief sets.

It's a concept of infallibility that's completely in opposition to the scientific process

chick tracts
In "Big Daddy?" We get this exchange between an "atheist" professor and a creationist student: https://www.chick.com/images/tracts/0055/0055_14.gif

But earlier the professor brings up carbon-14 dating and in another panel he holds holds up a skullcap saying that modern dating methods(note the plural) place man as being older than darwin could have imagined

Yet he responds to a question about how remains are dated by saying they just compare the fossils to the age of the layer of rock they were found in and determine the age of the rocks by the age of the fossil. But clearly this professors is aware of radiometric dating techniques that are used to determine ages. Carbon 14 being just one method used. Creationists have to set up strawmen to argue against and they fail even at that!