Talk:Cauchy sequence

I'm sure this is very interesting to those who are, well, interested, in such things. But why do we have it? Are we to become the home for articles that are unwanted or too technical for CP?--Bobbing up 15:48, 6 January 2009 (EST)


 * My reasoning is on my user page, in the section "An essay on the math and science offerings". While this stuff is admittedly off the beaten track for RW, it does have a place.  It's only "unwanted" and "too technical for CP" because Ed Poor made it so.  Gauss 12:34, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Mission template
I have read your userpage and I'm afraid that I cannot see how this article fulfils the missions as set out.--Bobbing up 12:52, 7 January 2009 (EST)
 * I second this. I feel like these articles are "too good for CP", but "not good enough for Wikipedia" so he came here.  They don't add anything, they aren't funny...  I could understand some basic pages on Statistics, since that's a huge part of understanding the game playing by various revisionists... but not just "math" for the sake of 'but i wrote it and CP won't publish it".  (rant done).-- 14:49, 13 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Delete - we aren't here to be "the encyclopedia that CP should have been"; only CP can do that, but it's run by somebody both incompetent and gutless. Their loss. Totnesmartin 15:16, 13 March 2009 (EDT)