User talk:490b86fe5018a584abaea31a2e63738a507864ed04cc5902aa39c55c5793ef81/Archive 1

Welcome
15:43, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

dude
what's with all the random all caps joke blocks.-- Mie kal  01:43, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Nothing really. I only do short blocks, and sysops do friendly blocks from time to time. But I admit, I may have went a little overboard with stuff like "GOD SEDUCED MARY" or "2015 WILL BE THE YEAR OF THE APOCALYPSE!!!!".--Palaeonictis (talk) 17:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Nice
Or rather, ᵑǃais! I enjoyed your pseudo-religious ramblings, but do you have anything which more closely resembles Yoruba or Mayan material? Say, a poem about Tlazolteotl or a goddess, with Sapphic innuendos (saphism is a must)? BobRoss (talk) 23:50, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes.--Palaeonictis (talk) 11:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Or rather, I can cook something up from the cesspit I call a mind, but I`m not terribly familiar (read: not at all) with Yoruban mythology, and isn't Tlazolteotl Nahuatl rather than Mayan?--Palaeonictis (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry I took 2 months and 28 days to harass you Don Juan, I've been busy destroying reputations. Yes Tlazolteotl is Nahuatl, I got mixed up. Instead of Yoruban mythology, just use anything you're familiar with. Mí má kȍhà hńg gǀȕì ō ǁȁhìn-ā ō hȁ ō gǀè gù ǀxūúnnu. (talk) 22:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Good, Bob, I`m most familiar with American Indian and Germanic mythologies, although the placeholder category "American Indian mythology" is quite a broad brush, considering that the demonym "American Indian" is comprised of hundreds of different, unrelated tribes that are often as far apart from each other as the Chinese are to the English (well, before the days of globalization anyways), one wouldn't place the Haudenosaunee together with the various Apachean tribes, right? The ethnonym of "Germanic" is also a broad brush, but not nearly as big as "American Indian," and the Germanic peoples are a valid ethnolinguistic group, comprised of a set of ancient, medieval, and modern day peoples each characterized by a shared usage of the Germanic languages and cultural elements unique to the Germanic-speaking peoples, such as the Norse gods replacing the Roman gods as the names of the week, except for Saturday anyways. — Ɖøn Ĵuan   Harass  00:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I agree, try comparing Arapaho to Navajo. One of my all time favourite Indian myths would be that of Bakhbakwalanooksiwey. Mí má kȍhà hńg gǀȕì ō ǁȁhìn-ā ō hȁ ō gǀè gù ǀxūúnnu. (talk) 05:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Anything involving Coyote would be bring a smile to my face. But I'll follow your suggestion, instead.. — Ɖøn Ĵuan   Harass  15:07, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Sysop
Hello Don Juan,

Thank you for making me a Sysop.Doublethink (talk) 21:39, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You're welcome.--Don Juan (talk) 21:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Blocking
You should not infinitely block or vandal bin IPs. See RationalWiki:Blocking_policy. CowHouse (talk) 09:44, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Even spammers?--Don Juan (talk) 09:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * "Spambots can be blocked for up to 3 months, but sysops should only block if there is repeated spamming from an IP address". You can block an IP spammer for a few days, and if they spam again block them for up to 3 months. CowHouse (talk) 09:59, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, got it. I had seen other sysops doing so and thought it was now okay. My mistake.--Don Juan (talk) 10:17, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I just thought I'd check if I made a mistake. You blocked this IP recently but there have been no edits since May 2018. Am I missing something? CowHouse (talk) 13:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * As far as I`m aware you made a mistake. Somehow the IP reuploaded a spam page already deleted, so I blocked them. Maybe the logs are glitching out or something. Anyways, I see fit that I reblock the IP, pending approval of the mob of course.--Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 13:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Why is there nothing under deleted user contributions? CowHouse (talk) 13:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I have no clue. Perhaps I`m just insane.--Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 13:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Seems like there was a mistake, it was actually this IP. It recreated the spam page that was created by the first IP in May. --RWRW (talk) 14:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah, thank you, I'll see to it that the IP gets blocked right away.--Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 14:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Apparently you've already blocked the turd. Good, I'd hate to be the only one doing maintenance around here (wink wink, nudge nudge).--Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 14:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * He would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for meddling Sysops. --RWRW (talk) 14:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Considering that he uploaded an obscure piece of spam, I`m reasonably confident it's the same guy. Anyways, sincerely, thank you for pointing out the mistake, I was starting to worry if I was going insane or not.--Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 14:29, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I expect this IP spamming on the page of an unrelated IP trick is especially worked out to confuse us. 16:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

OOLON!!! (fiter 55)
WTF with the "Oolon" filter? You configured it to block and remove all userrights on any account creation without warning! 16:27, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * My mistake, my wiki-skills are rusty, I meant it to block any username containing the name "Oolon". I'll reconfigure it so it doesn't fuck up like that again.--Don Juan (talk) 16:29, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah right, basically copying filter 54 is the solution. You forgot to give it anything to match against, so by default it was matching everything. 16:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You have my thanks.--Don Juan (talk) 16:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Just out of interest, why are we blocking oolon accounts?  16:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Because a user blocked with a permaban keeps creating new sock accounts to avoid that permaban, so I figured that we should just cut this Gordian Knot, easiest solution to the problem.--Don Juan (talk) 18:22, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

New users
It's best not to welcome new users until they make themselves known by at least an initial edit or two (e.g., User:Holocaust deniers are stupid). Bongolian (talk) 04:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Got it.--Don Juan (talk) 11:56, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Swearing
When I use words like "frag(ger)", "slag(ging)", or "flippin" I actually am swearing. If you want I can link the books that I took them from. 23:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Flipping might be one of those words that are no longer regarded as "profanity" among the eyes of today's society, sort of like the word "crap", once regarded as an expletive, but not so much anymore. I could get away with saying it in elementary school, and that's saying something. If anything, what you mean is that you're using euphemisms for harsher swear words, but not actually using any swear words themselves, so it might still be swearing, but saying "flipping" instead of "fucking" counts as using a euphemism, instead of using a cuss word. Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 23:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * slag is a pretty common swear word in uk. its synonymous with slut. what is the definition you using? AMassiveGay (talk) 00:42, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * CUNT. FECK. ARSE. GOIRLS. -- MtD Bogan   00:54, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * thats just rude AMassiveGay (talk) 01:01, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * To be honest I rarely use "slag(ger)/(ging)", partly because I don't know what they mean outside of brief usage in Shadowrun novels, sourcebooks (commentary by fictional characters in the sourcesbooks to be exact), and video games (context is not always there with swearing in Shadowrun). As I said before, I'm not using them as euphemisms, I'm using them as swearwords in and of themselves.  01:40, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * thems not proper swears if they dont mean anything, or no one knows what they mean. it would be like having to explain a joke AMassiveGay (talk) 02:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I wasn't aware of that, I was basing my definition of "swear words" based off of American profanity. Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 08:30, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
 * american swears are rubbish, and they are mostly the same as ours. take cunt for instance even now i am surprised when people take umbrage at it - its still generally considered bad mind, it just does not have that specific application that riles folk. you'd get a slap from ya mother though. and when americans use english swear words - bollocks and wanker specifically. sets my teeth on edge. you just dont say them right. its just weird. any other nation, any other accent, no problem. almost adorable with french accent. american? stop it. AMassiveGay (talk) 01:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * A bit of a prejudice against Americans going on now? The reason I suspect that you feel that way is because Americans tend to use those swears in jest, since our cussing vocabulary, while containing a large amount of overlap with yours, doesn't contain everything that the Brits' does, and vice versa. Compare "bollocks" with "bullshit". Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 14:05, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Check it out
Special:AbuseFilter/examine/log/30443

Spam or legit?

Doesn't seem to match the usual pattern. 00:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd recommend we be cautious about it, don't be too hasty to block him, but keep an eye on him just in case. He did mention his (supposed) real name, so one of us will have to investigate further to see if it's legit or not. The question is, which one of us will? Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 11:00, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Ninja
So what can RW assassins do as well (as the term is not on the list) over and above ninjas? Anna Livia (talk) 17:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * They have super secret pirate powers. Its very secret. 18:03, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Only a RW Templar would dare to question the almighty power of the RW Assassins. Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 18:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * What are RW Templars when they are at home (and do they have access to the supposed lost treasures of the Templars?)?
 * As they do not appear on the User group rights page 'just asking.' Anna Livia (talk) 19:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you want access to such privileged information you'll have to contact the Grand Master of the RW Templars. Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 19:50, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * As you were contemplating my inclusion in the RWA, I am, reasonably, curious. Anna Livia (talk) 00:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * You'd have to undergo the initiation process, a grueling task that may task the soul, body, and mind. Are you up to the task? Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 00:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Providing it does not interfere with other activities in the wikiverse and elsewhere in the user-contributory-verse, my limited interest in 'the technicalities of wikis', automatic correction of minor mistakes in other users' contributions to talk pages, Real Life, and 'being "more patient" than some fringe contributors to RW who do not like their views challenged.' Anna Livia (talk) 13:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * You really think that such a thing as the RW Assassins actually exists? It was a joke. Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes for the sake of clarity, there are no pirate or assassin user-groups... yet. 16:47, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Be careful of what you mention. Anna Livia (talk) 18:31, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * So what does it involve - given that I am 'somewhat miffed' by the behaviour of several IPs. Anna Livia (talk) 11:47, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you interested in becoming a tech? Do you have any coding experience? Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 11:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * No to both - my skills are elsewhere. Besides talk page activity (in some areas) is getting to the point where it is no longer appropriate to access the website on public terminals. Anna Livia (talk) 12:13, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * So you're not interested in RW anymore? Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 12:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I do have my home computer - and RW has always been merely one component: so more 'less activity.' Anna Livia (talk) 13:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I can actually relate to you on that. RW is only one part of my online activity as well, and historically I've never been nearly as active here as I have been over the past month or so. Ɖøn Ĵuan (talk) 13:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Why did you delete the Dove Rose Smith article? It was a reliable source. 2Cute4U (talk) 14:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Fine, I'll revert that deletion, and make the mob vote for deleting it. — Ɖøn Ĵuan   Harass  14:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Stoopid categories
Do we really need these stupid categories that you created (Category:Cunts and Category:Useless fucks‎)? Bongolian (talk) 05:47, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes. We do. It's nearly NYE. Why don't you unclench for 5 minutes? -- MtD Bogan   05:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Just as we don't allow vandalism in April's Fools, it's not good practice to allow "joke" categories. Deleting them. 07:41, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Against Fascism
Hi @Don Juan, I was wondering if you could think about paroling @Against Fascism. He might be a troll but it also seems like he could do some good. I would also like to ask him about his bar story. Sorry for bothering you. Tabula Rasa (talk) 07:15, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Binning someone isn't the same as blocking them, it merely restricts their editing rate to one edit every thirty minutes or so. — Ɖøn Ĵuan   Harass  08:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * @Don Juan, Ok thanks and sorry for bothering you. Tabula Rasa (talk) 18:25, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

News commentary
I deleted that because WIGO World is for news stories, not commentary. Nerd (talk) 18:28, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I left a note on your talk page, I'd prefer to discuss it there. Having two discussions on it only serves to add needless confusion. — Ɖøn Ĵuan   Harass  18:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

DUDE
Sucker! You gave sysop to an active troll! 22:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to rub it in. —  Ɖøn Ĵuan  Harass  23:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I assume you did it before I renamed them to Trolly McTrollface, so no biggy. :/ 23:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yup. No offense taken, I was semi-joking with the above remark anyways. —  Ɖøn Ĵuan  Harass  23:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Trout
That account you gave the Mop to was an imposter pretending to be Shabidoo--RWRW (talk) 22:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, now you guys are just being mean. (puts on a pouty face) —  Ɖøn Ĵuan  Harass  23:02, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

saloon bar
what the fuck did you do? AMassiveGay (talk) 14:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I archived most of it, the page was getting too cluttered. —  Ɖøn Ĵuan  Harass  14:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * most of which was current. put it back. do properly or not at all AMassiveGay (talk) 14:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Most of which was days old and hadn't been updated in days. So therefore NOT current. —  Ɖøn Ĵuan  Harass  14:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * there was plenty of stuff there updated just yesterday, and even today. AMassiveGay (talk) 14:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh well. —  Ɖøn Ĵuan  Harass  14:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Mops aren't for padlocking articles you like the current state of
If you're looking at the options and you see "excessive vandalism", maybe see if the fossil record has more than 10 edits in the last month, first. Zionism is contentious and prone to provoking intense arguments, but the actual article was pretty much left alone. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 22:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

You are invited...
...to the secret club. 19:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Is the block evasion substantiated?
I saw people raise the concern, but is it at sysoprevoke, permaban evidence levels? ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 23:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Don't know for sure, for now I'll unblock him. Remembering to keep him on sysoprevoke for now, don't know why in the hell thought it was a good idea to demote him, but I`m sure Arthur has his reasons. —  Ɖøn Ĵuan   Harass  08:49, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

YOU failed the convington test
The subsequent "clarifications" were all bullshit smokescreens. They were virulently racist to someone who had done nothing to them, in accordance with years of substantiating evidence that the school has a culture from administration-down of doing really shitty bigoted stuff. A lot. A call for further context shows a disgusting and hateful context, if you actually look at it. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 17:37, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Discord drama
Their behavior on Discord has no bearing on the wiki unless it's directly related (hypothetically, if they were planning a raid would count). The sysoprevoke was completely inappropriate. Do not abuse your powers, as you have just done, again. 19:56, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Again? I don't remember abusing them before. Also, when could I hypothetically get my Tech status back, ? —  Ɖøn Ĵuan  Harass  20:34, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I recommend you take this up on the mod page to see what the rest of us think. 20:42, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Just did. —  Ɖøn Ĵuan  Harass  20:47, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Discord Drama
What are your recommendations for the mods here, for dealing with spillover drama? RoninMacbeth (talk) 02:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Tell everyone to knock the shit off, or be prepared to face consequences. Keep the Discord drama over there, and not over here. TBF This is all kind of my fault. —  Ɖøn Ĵuan   To Harass and Intimidate  02:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Also it's prudent to add that the Discord server is actually relatively fine, and doesn't deserve the vitriol it has gotten thrown at its way. —  Ɖøn Ĵuan  To Harass and Intimidate  02:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry
I didn't mean to do anything wrong. Have a nice day. Public School Girl (talk) 18:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Vandal
There's a person vandalizing from an IP address that starts with 99, just thought I'd let you know. (And I need to put my phone away before I get in trouble, I can already see this is going to be addictive). Public School Girl (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The Don in his infinite wisdom has made you a sysop btw, if you want to play with the vandals anytime you can. 20:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Go fuck yourself, . :D —  Ɖøn Ĵuan  To Harass and Intimidate  22:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

For digging up fossilized treasures in the hot sun
Thank you! Bongolian (talk) 17:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

I just blocked somebody
Did I do it right? Eagles 2023 (talk) 14:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes you did it right. —  Palaeonictis  Fossil beds  14:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Don Juan
Are you the Don? I checked his page and it now leads to you? Commie Lib (talk) 01:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah it's him. 01:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Si. —  Palaeonictis  Fossil beds  20:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Font color=teal. Dead giveaway.   ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You should be a detective at this rate. —  Palaeonictis  Fossil beds  21:26, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, your old sig used green. I swore it was teal.  ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 21:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

You need to be more judicious about handing out sysop rights
Be more careful in the future. You screwed up with User:Radiant Orb. A user who's only edits at the time was to get weirdly involved in deletion discussions all centered around race science should have set off your sock puppet alarms, not "hey new reliable user who can be trusted with a mop" sense. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 20:01, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you are way too quick about handing out mops. I didn't get mine until I had been here for months. 20:32, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Na, everyone should get the mop at the earliest point. It's not like it means much anyway. That some people turn out too be bad eggs is just how it goes. 20:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I think that, as a matter of principle, mops should be distributed as soon as the user has demonstrated they actually are sane, or at least not destructive. So, I guess that you should be cautiously bold when giving out mops. Basically, don't hand it out to the more obvious crypto-racists. 21:16, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Duly noted. —  Palaeonictis  Fossil beds  22:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * it's the third time you're reminded this... maybe another trout will help? :P 00:28, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Nope, not needed. —  Palaeonictis  Fossil beds  13:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Huh
I didn't realise you were a Nietzschean. 11:34, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * It's partly facetious, . —  Ubermensch  Pierce through the wonder of amazement at the ubermensch  12:51, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Makes sense. 13:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Go easy on renaming yourself
I don't want to think you're three different people. 22:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Point taken. —  Übermensch   Pierce through the wonder of amazement at the ubermensch  23:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

So... who was he?
Paycheck, I mean. ℕoir LeSable (talk) 19:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The guy who follows mikey around and points out his socks is also an sock-abusing, obsessive race troll, with slightly different racist views that make him hate mikeymike. He's better at staying deep-cover longer, though.  ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 19:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah, good to know. Thanks! ℕoir LeSable (talk) 19:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

If you don't mind me asking...
Why do you keep renaming yourself? Just curious. -- Goatspeed. 15:56, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Because I can't for the life of me decide on a name I want to stick with. Oxyaena (talk) 17:35, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I see. You could stick with your current name, Oxyaena. It's what you also call yourself on your personal blog, so I think it fits. -- Goatspeed. 22:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Blocking Cthulhu5
He has made so few edits, who is he supposed to be that he is evading a ban? 15:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Johnnyart. — Oxyaena   Poke me  16:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Mikey
Who is he - as 82.44.143.26 is blocked because of him. Anna Livia (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry for taking so long to respond, Mikey is Michael Coombs, notorious internet troll and cyberbully. I unblocked BoN here for the record as well. — Oxyaena   Harass  07:40, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Notorious (little)
Seems like you've reached a level of minor notoriety on Conservapedia: you're on their main page as of yesterday. Conservapedia:Conservative has issued an ill-conceived challenge to you. Bongolian (talk) 19:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks like they read a blog post of yours.  19:39, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Sovereigntist
What's the deal with Sovereigntist? Which ban evasion are you referring to? I removed their rights today because of your claim. Advise if you think otherwise. Bongolian (talk) 02:07, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I thought he was Mike. You should probably re-sysop him, still he's fishy. — Oxyaena   Harass  02:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * OK Bongolian (talk) 02:14, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Ken and debate. We win, he lost.
If he wants to debate either he comes here or you go there. Seriously man, you win because his lack of spine. I’ve won every debate I’ve ever had with Ken because of his lack of machismo. Ken can’t argue on an equal playing field? He loses. You win. Acei9 10:44, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Nice, he hasn't even put up any gloating response to me on Conservapedia yet, if ever. What a fucking joke. — Oxyaena   Harass  10:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * we’ve already beaten him in debate by his refusal to do so. He loses. Acei9 21:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Discord
What the hell is happening on Discord this time? 19:39, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I got banned because of stupid petty fucking bullshit. — Oxyaena   Harass  19:56, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat!
Ta fanx for reverting that tiresome BoN's vandalism on my talkpage. -- MtD Bogan   21:57, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Is that Scots? — Oxyaena   Harass  22:18, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Gaeilge (Irish) but I believe it's the same in Scots Gaelic. They are generally considered mutually intelligible. "Scots" is actually a dialect descended from Middle English ("do ye no ken?) and not related to either Irish or Scots Gaelic. -- MtD Bogan   22:36, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, not closely anyways, both Scots and Gaelic are Indo-European languages. — Oxyaena   Harass  22:45, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I should've been more precise. English (and by derivation Scots English) are Indo-European from the Germanic group, whereas Irish, Scots Gaelic and Manx are Indo European from the Celtic (Goidelic) group. The other branch in the Celtic group is the Brythonic which encompasses Welsh, Cornish and Breton. -- MtD Bogan   03:16, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * That reminds me, it's unlikely that Gaulish or were part of either the Goidelic or Brythonic group, it's truly sobering to realize the Celtic languages and peoples we have now are just the mere ghosts of what was once a grand ethnolinguistic group of people, a lot of knowledge has been lost with their passing, and for linguistics it's unlikely we can ever get as close to reconstructing  as we have Proto-Indo-European simply because so much of the Celtic language base has been lost to history. Welp. —  Oxyaena   Harass  03:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, I'm aware that much of the ethno-linguistic classification is quite hit and miss, a ham-fisted attempt to make sense of what had avoided being lost in the mists of time. -- MtD Bogan   03:48, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It's the best we can do, and hey, for so much being lost you have to give credit to linguists, historians, and archaeologists for reconstructing what we do know, adding to our (admittedly limited) reservoir of knowledge about the Celts. — Oxyaena   Harass  07:28, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

His name was Toussaint
? I've moved the page. Spud (talk) 11:23, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Trying to make new page
I was trying to make a draft "The Progressive Voice", but it won't let me make new pages. Do you know what's going on? Gynocentrism Watch (talk) 00:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It was prevented by an edit filter; 1 & 2. I made changes to filter 58 to deal with the issue so if you try again you will be fine. I can get your page text back from the database if you need it. 12:09, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I'd appreciate that, as I put a lot there and had to sift through an hour's worth of livestream to post some quotes. Gynocentrism Watch (talk) 13:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries, see Draft:The Progressive Voice. 13:13, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Tried publishing the page, but it still won't let me. Can someone prevent people from making it so I can't create pages? Gynocentrism Watch (talk) 13:28, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Well I mean to publish the page you need to move the draft to mainspace. 13:32, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

How does "ninja mode" work exactly?
Hi, I have noticed that you recently trusted me with the right of "ninja". I'm curious: How exactly do you do this ninja thing (as in, becoming a bot so that you can quickly change categories or section titles)? Thanks. -- Goatspeed. 17:28, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * It doesn't do jobs quickly but I think it hides your edits from the recent changes so it doesn't clog up your maintenance work (such as adding categories repeatedly). Bots, however, actually do quick, automatic work, but requires you know some script and programming knowledge. 17:32, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

You know I was just being funny, right?
File talk:What I say to liberals and atheists.jpeg Here. Public School Girl (talk) 15:32, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * So was I. — Dr. Ox   quack specialist  18:55, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

What are we, three?
This is a reference to this. I disclosed my association with Conservapedia both on the AfD and on my user page, ding dong. Also,, who are you proposing that I am doxing? Blocking me for that for no reason while an active AfD at Wikipedia links here stating that I am not banned is libelous you know... I'd sure like to know who I am doxing. (Also, this account is not "ban evasion" as it existed long before this sham of a block, and sockpuppetry in itself is not against RW rules). Conspirate (talk) 03:28, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I didn't see you reference it on the deletion page. Also Bongolian's shit should go on his talk page, I don't want mine being the scene of a flame war, especially when it means I'll get three thousand notifications, I have OCD. — Dr. Ox   quack specialist  03:32, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * (EC) What the fuck is this. Please keep your offsite drama offsite. Stop threatening users here or you will find your account severely limited here. Cosmikdebris (talk) 03:34, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * (e/c)I'm sorry, I'm annoyed at Bongolian's shenanigans and the AfD shenanegans, I don't want to take it out too harshly on you. Conspirate (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * This isn't the place for offsite drama. Thanks in advance for taking the discussion elsewehere. Cosmikdebris (talk) 03:39, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Removed some content that obviously belongs in the article Star Wars
Curse you for demoting me. Also, why?! Been on Wikipedia for three years and I'm not even autopatrolled :'(. 20:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

P.S: Your cat looks alot like mine.

Dude, really?
"you should've been aborted" Look, the little shithead annoys me too, but that's a bit far, don't you think? 02:05, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry. — Dr. Ox   quack specialist  02:13, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

"You should have been aborted."
I know how annoying people like him can be. But please don't say things like that, that's really uncool. RoninMacbeth (talk) 03:42, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree, it's a really nasty personal attack. 04:11, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Just making sure y'all know that Oxy and I already handled this. 05:38, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw that after I posted this. Sorry if I overdid it. RoninMacbeth (talk) 06:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Indef block
I see you indef blocked User:B-loved genius and called them a Nazi for vandalising the Noah Carl article. The RationalWiki:Blocking policy suggests that such actions should only result in a short block. Also, I don't think you can conclude they're a Nazi just because they claim that Noah Carl is not a racist and it's an issue of academic freedom. Technically they're wrong that it's an issue of academic freedom because no-one really gets tenure in the UK any more, and in any case Carl wouldn't have had it. But being wrong doesn't make someone a Nazi. --Greenrd (talk) 17:23, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Do not edit war
While this wasn't discussed much in the coop case, do not edit war. 21:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

FYI
You should fucking bail on this place. You don't know me and I don't know you, but I was randomly tipped off to that coop case with Nerd because I was curious to see what bone-headed bullshit he was up to recently, and wow. That so few people here are willing to call out that kind of false equivalency when it comes to AOC being a "racist" is irritating to the fucking nine, but it's the norm for this place. Nerd stupidity level bullshit (and you're lucky to deal with that, the more common level bullshit is Ariel's kind of idiocy) whether it's being stubborn in the face of evidence or the kind of edit warring on tone policing or deliberately dragging out small issues everyone understands, it's not a fluke, it's a goddamn feature. I know it's hard to want to bite the bullet and run, especially when a total stranger is advising you, but yeah, I ignored the red flags for months and kept on hoping for something better, only to be disappointed that much harder. There's a few good people here, but even the most vocal ones in calling out what happens here on a regular basis do not go nearly far enough.

Also, lol@Mario calling you out for edit warring. RobShit aka Nobs, a Nazi in all but name harassed her to the point that he sent her a bunch of nasty ass emails and she called a coop case to rightfully get rid of his ass, only for everyone to throw her under the bus, because "we can't ban people because they believe in psycho bullshit like Pizzagate and QAnon." The guy even claimed that he was just joking and the people here ate it up. Trust me, if the higher-ups saying that coming down hard on right-wing bullshit is the same as Conservapedia in that coop case isn't enough to scare you off, then there's nothing that can be done. I wanted to think this place could be salvaged, but fuck me, it's a sinking ship! Even if all the hard work could produce something amazing, the constant stupidity permeating the site culture will always prevent it from being the fucking amazing place we all want it to be. James Earl Cash (talk) 06:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Oxyaena's been here longer than you, and you're advising Oxyaena on this — that's nervy! Also your summary of the Nobs-LGM dispute is not accurate in so far as LGM accepted Nobs' apology and that ended it. Nobs is a nasty troll and should have been banned, so you're correct about that part. Bongolian (talk) 07:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I mean, edit warring is bad, and I sent messages to other parties to not edit war. Nobs politely apologized, which was unexpected from him, and that was settled and I don't think I got any other nasty attacks since. But again, with Nerd having a pattern of acting contentious with his edits, I don't think he's really in bad faith either as he took the time to justify some his edits and has good contributions under my belt rather than be single-issue editors like some other editors I've established as dishonest (not you James Earl Cash but you sometimes push your edits way too much), and he acts polite on top of all of this. I generally assume character flaw rather than bad faith in this case. But that's the thing, even for more dishonest editors, it's really hard to get them to stop because they haven't broken any rules, really. I don't know your opinion on UnlicensedThinker on Saloon Bar, who got cooped a lot of times but was kept because he isn't breaking the rules, but I'm pretty sure you're also highly critical of how that handled too. 17:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Wait a sec . ..
. . . So there's somebody who thinks we're not opinionated, rude, and arrogant? But that's half the fun; it's the main reason I came to RW in the first place! :-D -- Bertrc (talk) 21:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Yup, the snark is what makes RW so special, we have our own take on things, we're not neutral. — Oxyaena   Harass  15:56, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Ninjadom
Indifferent as to whether I am or not - I tend to be 'typos corrected and talk pages commented on. Anna Livia (talk) 17:37, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Lol you finally noticed I revoked your shinobiship? — Oxyaena   Harass  19:24, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Why did you revoke her Ninja rights? 21:07, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * She never edits main space, for which it is to be used for, . — Oxyaena   Harass  21:11, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * There is a difference between 'not noticing' (message or not), and choosing not to pursue the matter.
 * I have equivalent rights elsewhere in the wikiverse, so just hang out here as, when and where it suits (where else can I make use of my collection of quotes and factoids, and annoy nuisances with sweet reasonablness?) Anna Livia (talk) 23:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The gaps (whether or not minded) being part of the comment. Anna Livia (talk) 17:19, 24 June 2019 (UTC)