Talk:International Marxist Tendency

This article is pretty skeletal in terms of content. There is an introductory sentence, a bunch of quotations, and then a short bit at the end stating that "Ted Grant also formulated science of perspectives." The article starts by describing an organization before switching to describing, using quotes, what appears to be a theory these guys had, and the overview provided by the quoted text is pretty nebulous itself. (Are they trying to say Marxism somehow disproves the Big Bang?) The article does nothing to explain what they're saying, nor does it describe the origins of the theory or its merits. If you remove the quotations, there's practically nothing there. The One They Call Mars (talk) 20:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * It needs revamping. It could cover "Marxist science", which the quotes seem to reach for, but it doesn't.   21:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, nevermind, the article's title refers to a specific organization, which the Marxist science parts seem only tangential to. The quotes should be salvaged as examples of psuedoscience in some other article, with the rest of the page deleted.   21:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I've used the anti-science material as fodder for a new article on dialectical materialism. There's no reason to keep this now.   22:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)