Category talk:Fish

Ain't this a bit lame? 01:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but it's accurate and to the point. Something we need more of. -- 01:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No it is not, it is another example mission creep and of the kind we have seen too many times; CUR's interests. 01:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * As far as I am aware, Tiktaalik is not a fish. Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 01:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Isn't it a part-time fish? 01:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No it is a genetically modified creature created in an antediluvian lab. 01:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * So it's a shif? 02:26, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Wait- you're complaining about mission creep in a category? So what about the category Animal? -- 15:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

At risk of agreeing with CUR again, it's only a bloody category. the only categories to abolish are those with one article (like this one on Wikipedia). btw This is not a call to create articles about different types of fish just to fill the category. Totnesmartin 15:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)