User talk:Stabby the Misanthrope/Archive7

Merge history
I didnt quiet follow what you meant. Explaining more slowly and I am sure I will catch on. My mind starts to turn to mush mid september. 15:14, 18 September 2008 (EDT)

You!
What happened to you then? Kidnapped? You were kidnapped, weren't you? I'll bet you were kidnapped. 15:23, 19 September 2008 (EDT)

Yet another new section that RA will ignore
...because he doesn't like me :( Anyway, you can't not play: you're the umpire! 13:54, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Did he actually accept that position, or was it more sort of "bestowed" upon him? Can't remember. -- 14:25, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
 * He actually bestowed it upon himself, I believe. It's all in my third talk-page archive. Of course, after the initial rush of self-importance, he clearly tired of our Epic Struggle and decided not to show up again. 14:30, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
 * That might in fact be the best kind of judge imaginable. -- 14:34, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Just think of me as an absentee overlord.  16:16, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
 * No
 * : P 16:20, 20 September 2008 (EDT)

Jeeves
You're quite sting-y lately, aren't you? 00:46, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * If it talks like a jerk and acts like a jerk, it's probably a jerk.  00:50, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Strange. As I age, I find myself less and less tolerant of assholes.   00:50, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I have the exact opposite problem. Anyway, I can't see what Jeeves has done to warrant this animosity, apart from make a semi-tasteless joke a couple of days ago. 00:53, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I wish you wouldn't wander off while I'm still talking to you. 01:08, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I was typing. Gah!  Edit conflict!   01:17, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Sry... 01:29, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * That's understandable. You weren't here for the full-scale war that Jeeves initiated.   01:17, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Actually I was. 01:29, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Strange. I don't remember you from that time at all.  Where you still just a lurker then?   02:06, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * "Just" a lurker??? I was the sovereign of lurkers! Don't you remember how when I first signed up Human was convinced that I was an established user's sock? 02:13, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Vaguely. It's been a while.   02:24, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm still convinced that you're an established user's sock. [[Image:Nods.gif]] -- 05:31, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Tell us more! Who! And what about Chaos!'s socks in CP? Editor at CPLiar at RP! 06:31, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You know why I don't like him? Here's why:
 * He's like Proxima Centauri, minus the ignorance and naivete. He says the same things she does, but because he isn't as oblivious as she is, his words exude bitterness and anger.   01:17, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You know, I find it really hard to actually dislike any of our resident atheists (Rational Thinker being a notable exception), however caustic they may be sometimes. 01:29, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I think I've grown to dislike them because of my older brother (and to a lesser degree, my parents).  01:54, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I have more respect for my brother than anyone else in the world. He is profoundly religious and a more profoundly good person than anyone I have ever met.  For him, his religion and his good works necessitate and reinforce each other, and both are an integral part of his identity.  He "talks to God" and firmly believes in God.  Yet he is more rational than anyone on this website; while all of us are sitting on our asses editing this wiki, my brother is building a path for peace and human rights in Palestine.
 * And then there's Jeeves (and Proxima, and on occasion, others) who say that the religious and those who believe in God are irrational. To which I can only respond, "Fuck you.  I will gladly take my brother's "irrationalism" over your rationalism any damn day."   01:53, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I couldnt help but eavesdrop on this conversation and I would like to say that I am totally in agreement with Radioactive in that as I age I become much less tolerant of fuckwits. Now I have reached the sterling age of 28 I find myself with no patience and a sharp tongue. I am quick to anger also. It can only get worse........Ace McWickedSubstansive comments only 02:01, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed, soon we will both be sitting on our front porches in rocking chairs, waving our canes and yelling at children to get off our lawn. : )   02:08, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * "Your fat, ugly children shouldn't have been anywhere near my house in the first place so it's not my fault your son has a black eye." Ace McWickedSubstansive comments only 02:11, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Have you considered converting to Jellyfishism, O fiery young man? 02:10, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I know what you mean about your brother. My sister can often be offended on my behalf over this kind of thing -- far more than I would be myself ^_^ People are strange creatures. 02:10, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes we are ^_^   02:24, 21 September 2008 (EDT)

"As for your grandma, she shouldnt have mouthed off like that in the first place" Ace McWickedSubstansive comments only 02:30, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I must admit to having no fricking idea what this conversation is about, and, perhaps for once, a first, no idea what ideas people (and jellyfish) are promoting as theirs. Perhaps this deserves an award?  ħ uman  02:38, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Did you try reading the whole thing? That sometimes helps.  : )   02:42, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yeah, well, I read down to the bottom, then I commented... then again, there may be outside ideas I am not incorporating in my attempt to understand.  ħ uman  02:51, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Ah, I think I see the problem here. It appears you are having a brain fart.
 * Try rebooting your mind to clear your cache, then rereading the conservation. : )   03:03, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * How about you get off my lawn!!!!?  ħ uman  03:06, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * One cannot "get off your lawn". One can only transcend it.   03:08, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Apparently you haven't seen my lawn...  ħ uman  03:13, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * For $20* I will mow it for you.  03:18, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * * Not including cost of travel fare and room and board.
 * $20??? I can mow it in 20 minutes, burning about a half pint of gasoline. It is lush, and long and thick, though, and I don't like to mow it often.  I can provide pics ;)  ħ uman  03:23, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You probably already have. It's all part of your scheme to convert RW into GardenWiki. 03:24, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Muahahahahaha!!! Yup.  ħ uman  03:27, 21 September 2008 (EDT)

News
In order to prevent you from becoming muddled and/or confused, I must warn you that I have a new name. As you were. 23:17, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Thank you, because I was wondering who the hell "Pink" was, and why their userpage was on my watchlist.  23:24, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You should have seen recent changes about an hour ago. Even I didn't know I had that many things in my userspace ^_^ 23:35, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Wait: my userpage in your watchlist?? That would sort of disconcerting o_O
 * I think you mean my talk page. 23:37, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
 * My secret's out—I watch your userpage! : )   16:11, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Well as long as you don't watch my window... (And elide correctly, please) 16:29, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Unfortunately, if you watchlist a talk page, you also end up watchlisting the article page. I say "unfortunately" because it floods my watchlist with changes I don't particularly care about.   16:11, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

More news
AKjeldsen is a big red dragon. Please tell the people. 15:57, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Does that make you the Woman Clothed in the Sun? : )   16:11, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Ooh. Very impressive. Excellent obscure cultural reference there. -- 16:16, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yeah, yeah, I read Red Dragon as well. And anyway, it should be either "Clothed in Sun" or "Clothed with the Sun", I'm afraid, so I am docking you 12 points for that.
 * Besides, your comparison makes no sense unless I am the Catholic Church, which I'm fairly sure I'm not. 16:29, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I never read the book. My magnum opus in AP European History was an essay on Romanticism in paintings and poetry.  So I actually did research, while you only know it from a fiction book.  : P  Neener neener neener!   16:33, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Personally, I know it from Wikipedia. [[Image:Nods.gif]] -- 16:35, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Actually, I got it from WP too -- I theorised that your awareness of it would most likely be explained by one of the entries in the "In Popular Culture" section. I guess I was wrong :P 16:41, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Your sig
Would you pleeeeese amend your sig (the penis ref), it was funny at first but gets a little wearing with time. 01:23, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'll admit, it's a bit old hat by now. Changing it now...   01:26, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Thanks, it has been especially notable because of your omnipresence. 01:29, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm flattered that you would call me omnipresent. : )   01:30, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Err... missed a be? (used to befunny)  01:37, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * ...I meant to do that. I was testing you.   01:39, 23 September 2008 (EDT)

Important notice
I am about to wandalise your signature... Please to enjoy while effects last. Thanks you. 16:02, 23 September 2008 (EDT)

Hmm.
"I think you misunderstand what What is going on in the world? is for. It's meant to report on general craziness, not reasonable things." I thought it was for interesting things whatever their slant. 16:12, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * She's right, RA. 16:59, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
 * In my defense, one could interpret my comment as meaning that. Also, that makes the IP's contribution even less like wandalism, and Lily's edit comment rather callous.   21:15, 23 September 2008 (EDT)

1234567890qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm
I still prefer your classic orange n' blue one... 00:25, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I changed it because Icewedge thought it was "garish". And this version feels more "mature" to me.   01:51, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Well if you want mature, you'll need to get something like EssayistRATalk.
 * Or you could adopt a mowse ^_^ 01:58, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You made mature look dull... &mdash; Unsigned, by: Radioactive afikomen / talk / contribs
 * Yay! Mowses are cute!
 * Did someone step on a mowse? Ook, I have goo on my foot!  Oh, nevermind, it's just a .  ħ uman  00:21, 25 September 2008 (EDT)

A word in your ear...
Re: this. I shall give you thirty seconds to correct your wrongdoing. Then I shall eviscerate you. 15:06, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * S/He worked hard at it. I was giving praise and encouragement to a less-established editor.  Didn't your parents ever tell you to be nice to people?   15:21, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Give me a link to your version, and I shall praise you too. : )   15:21, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It's not online. I was going to email it to Human. I'm just being anxious about it at the moment.
 * Congratulations, you have (barely) escaped evisceration. Have you done this before? 15:25, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Why, yes, I do regularly praise other editor's efforts. I'm nice that way.   15:37, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Have you praised your comrade today?  15:37, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I told AKjeldsen his hat was nice. 15:43, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Did you actually see it, or just assume it was nice? Because I've seen pictures of him, and he has terrible fashion sense.   16:03, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You have? I do? [[Image:Th_unsure.gif]] -- 16:11, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I have Seen it, not seen it.  16:14, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Ah. I See. -- 16:16, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Wait, what? Come again?
 * Um... ? 16:17, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You see, sometimes you need to See rather than to just see, if you See what I mean. -- 16:20, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't speak gibberish.
 * More importantly, where is these pictures of you being fashion-blind? You're not wearing a Hawaiian shirt, are you?? ^_^ 16:24, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Let's just say he likes polka dots with his plaid.  16:25, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Do not listen to this scandalmongerer. I don't even own a Hawaiian shirt. Or a plaid. Not to mention one with polka dots. -- 16:27, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes you do. I saw it in a Dream Of ProphesyTM. It was pink with red strikes and purple dots. 16:32, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * While I'm certainly fascinated to learn that you Dream prophetically of me, I think you need to work a bit on your reception. -- 16:39, 25 September 2008 (EDT)
 * He also wears tighty whities.  16:46, 25 September 2008 (EDT)

And don't call me "pinkie"
16:55, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
 * To be honest, I was going for a "Pinkie and the Brain" reference, but you aren't much of a boob. : )   16:57, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I fancy our roles would be reversed, should that comparison be made :P 16:59, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I resent that.  17:07, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I was only teasing you, silly. Hence the sticking-tongue-out smilie. 17:09, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Perhaps you could be Pinkie as he is in the "That Smarts" episode? : )   17:11, 26 September 2008 (EDT)

Thank you for welcoming
Lol, you welcomed me two time, once as an IP, once as registered.

There is a particular subject I'd like to help in. I discovered that Andy had an argue with PJR about what the pope said.

As a French, I'd like to clarify some things about the translation. Where should I post this?

Than you.

Barraki 15:15, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Sorry for the delay.  16:22, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You should first put it on talk:WIGO.  16:22, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 * And you're welcome. : )   16:23, 27 September 2008 (EDT)

Look upon me, in all my wonder...
Hey, you! Check out my new sig! It is truly magnificent. 14:42, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Even if it took a few tries to get there. :P -- 14:49, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Don't listen to AKjeldsen. My signature sprang into being perfect and fully formed. 14:53, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * As if you don't have enough channels to send messages already. Besides, the font is too small to read. -- 15:09, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * 15:14, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * 15:14, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Actually, you're right. The problem is not so much the size as the colour.. -- 15:16, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Man if I had a nickel for every time I heard that...--Antifly 15:18, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * That's funny. It looks the same to me.   15:23, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * That's because you're not looking at the important bit. 15:24, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

Category:opinionated users
That's all of us, isn't it? :) 15:58, 29 September 2008 (EDT) Totnesmartin
 * I would like to come out on the record and state that I do not hold opinions, I simply know the TruthTM. tmtoulouse 16:00, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I would like to state that all truth is opinion to postmodernists, but that's just an opinion. Totnesmartin 16:05, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Well as a logical positivist I know the postmodernist are meaningless. tmtoulouse 16:09, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Fortunately, as a postmodernist, I know that the logical positivist are merely deluding themselves... in my opinion. -- 17:01, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

Picard
Try not to overdo it. 15:28, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * On a seprate note, I have now noticed the new part to your signature.  15:30, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Er? 15:32, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I have just left you a .  15:39, 30 September 2008 (EDT)

Hey!
Please tell me your renamed user "Behold a Wimpy Orange-ish Dragon and the Vandal Clothed in the Mud" is not a reference to AK and/or Me. Don't make me bite your toes. 16:37, 30 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Um, no, it was a bald reference to the painting by William Blake.  02:19, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

I think writing on people's user pages is a mite intrusive. Sure, we don't like the old red links, but still. Can we at least 1. use a nicer template name and 2. make the message more welcoming? As it is, it's a tad obnoxious. Why not ask them on their talk page (with a template, of course) to edit their user page at least once to kill the red link?  ħ uman  01:36, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I consent to making it less obnoxious. As for putting it on the userpages without permission... well, that can just blank the page if they don't like, can't they?   02:01, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Less obnoxious is all that I think is really needed. Perhaps a grief explanation of our allergy to red links?  Sort of like a belated welcome template, only friendlier?  Links to our userboxen, requests for personal details like bank account numbers and PINs, that sort of thing?  Thanks for your consideration...  ħ uman  02:15, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * 02:29, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I stuck beans up my nose. Now what!?  ħ uman  04:09, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Should I assume you've continued breathing through your mouth?  04:49, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

People
Shouldn't things like "" be subcategories of People? 15:26, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Jesus, that was fast. There wasn't even one minute between my creation of the category and my remembering to categorize it.  Whatever happened to patience?   15:39, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Sorry. I didn't realise you were going to do that. 15:45, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I can understand that. But, Good Lord, you couldn't even wait one minute before jumping on it?   15:50, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I react to things as soon as I notice them, which makes my reactions pretty random. I hope you don't feel too victimised :( 16:02, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * PS I am eating a lovely wonderful sandwich. Do you want some?  16:10, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
 * It's probably not kosher, but I'd appreciate some anyways. : )   00:15, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm afraid you've missed the sandwich window. You can have the crusts if you really want. They probably have a small amount of loveliness and/or wonder in them. 15:48, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Uh, no thanks. I'll just wait for you to make another sandwich.   15:59, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Are you... telling me to make you a sandwich?? 16:24, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * No, I was telling you to give me half of whatever sandwich you happen to have right now.  22:18, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * 'm not makn yu a sandwch
 * Please admire my new signature. *twirls* 22:29, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, it's very, er, Christmas-y.  22:49, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * You're just jealous because you don't have a Christmas signature. 22:53, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm Jewish, so I most certainly am not. Though I will acknowledge that it is very cheery.   22:56, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * You Judaists don't appreciate the universal magick of Christmas? :( 23:06, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Although a bit presumptuous, seasonally speaking. Kan we haz fall and pumpkins first, pleez?  ħ uman  23:08, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

me
that bunch of numbers you welcomed was me, I forgot I wasnt signed in you see. Ace McWickedcast ye the first stone 03:46, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

The smoker in the shadows
Like my namesake, I'm always lurking, just waiting for that right moment. Also, I have a baby daughter that limits my online time. Czolgolz 09:01, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, dear. You seem to have some sort of Real Life.  My sympathies.  : )   15:30, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

References->Footnotes
Your idea have been accepted by the random group of people on my talk page, it is now being carried out by ACDbot. Just a FYI. tmtoulouse 15:10, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * You mean I just got gipped out of chance to pump my edit count radically high by changing it myself? Dang.   15:23, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Well ACDBot does the site alphabetically, so if you start at Z and work your way backwards you can meet it half way...tmtoulouse 15:26, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * About how long would it take the bot to work through all the articles?  15:28, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Few hours is my guess. tmtoulouse 15:31, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * You can check it now on recent changes, just show bot edits. tmtoulouse 15:31, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
 * You know I'd just come here to ask what was going on with this edit count pimping pumping of yours - now I understand. Good luck. --Bobbing up 16:11, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

Petition
? 23:25, 3 October 2008 (EDT)

Argumentative
No offence intended, RA, but you seem to have been a little more argumentative than heretofore, lately. Was it something we said? 23:27, 3 October 2008 (EDT)

You take a while to write things, don't you?
13:32, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * ...Maybe.   13:37, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * You're a perfectionist. Like me!
 * Or you're a terrible writer. One of those things. 13:46, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * It's the former. I am certainly not a terrible writer—haven't you seen my essays?   13:48, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * The ones you advertise in your signature? :P
 * More importantly: Hey! Our last two comments both had exactly the same number of bytes! It's a sign!! 13:54, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Behold! The Heaven's have parted, and a column of light illuminates our path!   16:34, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Hmmm. Steal my idea, would you?? 17:30, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * How can I steal, when this is CommieWiki?  20:54, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * This is CommaWiki, knave! 19:37, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Ha! I see your CommaWiki, and I raise you HyphenWiki!
 * I propose CorrectUseOfSemicolonWiki.... would you demonstrate, for the ignorant in our audience? 20:02, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I know I used it correctly once on this wiki; I'm not sure enough to hazard trying to correctly use it on the spot.  20:39, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed; it is quite complex. 21:19, 5 October 2008 (EDT)

Laying it on thick
Well while we're on the subject, I happened to see this, and thought of you. 21:16, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
 * U no liek? :( 19:37, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I like!  19:47, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Sorry, I merely prefer to watch a video multiple times to evaluate it. And it is worthy—it hath been favorited!   19:47, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * You have Fry and Laurie! I'm going to spend a few minutes rooting through your favourites... hold still, please... 20:02, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, please don't, there's some stuff in there that calls my taste into question.  20:09, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * No, no, I like rooting. Root root root. 20:18, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Was your taste ever in, er, doubt? Root rot, root rot, root rot...  ħ uman  23:34, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * And why don't you have a Youbute account, young man?  23:37, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Sadly, people mostly call me "sir" these days. It must surely be due to the attractive silvering at my temples of my lovely blond hair.  I just never felt the need for a Youbite account.  How's them apples?  Fresh, this time of year!  ħ uman  23:43, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * If you hang out in retirement homes, others can still call you a "young man". : )   23:46, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Good point. Of course, most of those who call me "sir" are pre-college adolescents.  To them I probably look ancient, if not decrepit.  I have learned to answer to it, although I have no mansion, and still theoretically "work" for a living.  ħ uman  00:09, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I will gladly call either of you "young man" (or anything, really) if you'll talk about something interesting for a little bit. 00:14, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * It's Human's fault for making things dull. The Man is like a boredom magnet : )  00:24, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Is Human "The Man", now? 00:35, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I am only such as I am. Teh human.  RA got me all mopey about my cat :(, so there.  As far as my being "sir", that's silly.  My favorite TV show is Futurama.  So there.  ħ uman  00:37, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Suits you, akshully :) 00:40, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I agree.  00:45, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I agree with your agreement. 00:52, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm afraid I must disagree with your agreeing with my agreement.   01:01, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, I agree. 01:09, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I disagree with your disagreement with agreeing with her agreement. And, Pinky, a "Ms." can be of any age. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"> ħ uman  01:13, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * This allowance was not adequately explained by Ms Wiz. 01:20, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * How about we just agree to disagree about our agreeing with each other's disagreements?  01:30, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * No, I disagree with that. 01:44, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Filthy liberal, always opposing those you disagree with. I can tell with a 95% certainty that you oppose diplomacy with Iran.  01:56, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Tsk tsk tsk. That doesn't sound very scientific, dear. 02:01, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh? And where was your "science" when Andy Schlafly lost his mind?  What pill has science given us to cure him?  You can't, can you?  So much for your hallowed "scientific method"!   02:05, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I think Pink's a boy/male/manthing (have a cigar!). I'll leave it up to you two to decide who is Fry and who is Leela.  Or both. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"> ħ uman  02:07, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I appreciate what you've added to the debate, but I'm ruling out "manthing", nonetheless. Just... no.
 * RA, are you typing out the whole template (" ") when you add your sig messages? There's a much easier way of doing it.  02:12, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Unfortunately, yes. What is this easier way you speak of?   02:14, 6 October 2008 (EDT)
 * The template that my sig drops straight into the page is this: " "
 * Only slightly easier in terms of actual typing, but much much easier on my brain. Go ahead and try it! 02:18, 6 October 2008 (EDT)

By the by the by...
Have you seen the new look of my jellyblog? It's quite... appropriate... 23:41, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
 * you cannot escape commenting, you silly fruitcake
 * I see. And yes it is.   02:11, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I tried commenting on it, but it wouldn't let me. You seem to have disabled comments, you  fruitcake.   02:11, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I have not! *bristle bristle*
 * I was playing with the settings a little while earlier. I've put them back, so does it work now? I'd hate to have a blog that quietly keeps everyone except me and AK from commenting 03:03, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

Thanks...
... for the quick welcome. But, alas, it was just me, hidden behind a bunch of numbers - which I've deleted, now. --LArron 05:19, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Ah, I see. Well, think of it as your complementary second welcomes.  : )   05:21, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

e-mail
done. waiting. PFoster 11:03, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Prepare to be spammed! I mean, er, emailed.   11:21, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * How do you enable email then? My email address is in the thingy thing...Matt oblong 15:54, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Hm. Type your full email address in to the little box in "my preferences", then hit "save".  Then you have to go to your email's inbox, open the e-mail confirmation from RationalWiki, and hit the link to confirm your email activation (you may have to check your spam folder).  If there's any problems that come up despite following the instructions, it's a technical issue, which puts us at the mercy of Tmtoulouse or Linus.   17:40, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

Email
I have activated my email so you can email me. Our evolution article has momentum. Ace McWickedThe Liquid Room 16:25, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Hm. I got the "Error, this user has not specified an email address".  Did you follow the instructions in the above section?   17:42, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * You also have to check the "Enable e-mail from other users" box. 17:50, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Fucking hell, it was working yesterday. try again, I have changed all my preferences. Ace McWickedThe Liquid Room 18:02, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Want a copy of what RA is going to send you? ;) <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"> ħ uman  03:25, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Too late, he already does.  03:46, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 * It's not as popular as I thought it would be...  03:46, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Try: "ID MSG:26443 I am Julia, 27 y.o. Russia (dating)" for greater success in "Best prices for best intimate living"? <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"> ħ uman  03:56, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Are you calling me a prostitute?  20:56, 11 October 2008 (EDT)

Hey
Hey, saw the note on my talk page. How long have I been here? Time certainly flies. I don't get around to a lot of editing, but I spend a fair amount of time lurking. Smyth 17:57, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

I came and see
I came and see words in very bad Esperanto. So I logged in and correct them. I don't quit understand the purpose of this wiki. It looks like Wikipedia but has not NPOV, right ? It struggles against creationists, and what else ? Is it an only US-project ? Wikipedia is multlingual and world-wide. I'm French and not very familiar with English. Cheers ArnoLagrange 19:27, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * We struggle against religious extremism and authoritarianism. Our site is intended for English-speakers, although we have a few people who speak other languages.   21:30, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 * There is correct Esperanto? ;-)  If you want to write something in French, about Le Pen (or in English about le Pen or FN), or about the joy of being in a country where no one cares if there was sperm on the dress -- they only care "did the president run the country well?"  Or about racism as it's developing in Paris, I think a French point of view (assuming you are French, and not african, Vietnamese, Canadian, or some other French speaking nationality - and if so,  then that point of view) would be highly enjoyed and appreciated! -- 18:17, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Send me another Very Important Email
I think it should be working now. --Gulik 16:25, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Done.  17:12, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Thanks
...for handing me this rancid rag and flea-bitten mop. Now that the power is MINE, I shall CRUSH!! KILLLL!!!!! DESTROYYYYYYYY!!!!!!! Time for my pills again, methinks Zmidponk 17:01, 11 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, yes, after the POWER irredeemably corrupts you, pills become a necessity.  20:55, 11 October 2008 (EDT)

I have sent you a very important lozenge
For your throat. 21:12, 11 October 2008 (EDT)