User talk:Brother Walt

Opinion or fact
Frankly, I am in fact one of those hated Bible believers. What brought me here was your well documented points re:Creationwiki. Frankly, It, The Institute for Creation Research, Back to Genesis and others, on one side of the fence are pushing some pretty obvious opinion that is shabbiness in the worst degree. On the other side of the equation, we have the totally discourteous opinionated and sanctimonious, who incessantly use terms like, We Think, It is Believed, Perhaps, Another Possibility, Probably, It Is Thought, and hundreds of ways to say "Maybe?".

I have a very simple question to ask everyone: Are you both so insecure that it is impossible to have civil discourse based strictly on actual facts? No! I am not trying to be belittling. Why are we totally unable to set so-called religion on a back burner; and get to mathematical elimination of the impossible of any germain given quantity of observed scientifically processed and reviewed facts?

I made myself a very good living as a trouble-shooter. My Electronics Instructor gave me a very simple set of rules: Simplify, Simplify, Redraw the Question, Find out what the real Question is, then Solve The Entire Problem before deciding what the answer should be [Marvin Matusof, 1964. That wisdom got me past the three ancient FCC transmitter licensing exams <3>.

I have thousands of questions and very few answers. On the other hand I have thousands of answers that are not permitted to be given either of you. And yes! I have been a royal pain in the dark spot for both sides.

I came here because the major question I want to get a definitive factual answer ti is in regards to mathematical absurdity (10 X 10 to the 44th power of ten) and the Universe: According to Annapolis Graduate and scientist extraordinaire Dr. Chuck Missler: Space is not an empty vacuum, but rather it is filled with ionized particles known as plasma. And it is expanding slightly, which could possibly be an aberation; and it is cooling according the normal Laws of Physics.

In the "Big Bang Theory," my natural inclination would be that as with any common explosive ordinance, the Universe should in fact be rather round, and very hot. Apparently this seems not to be the case at all. Why? Also if the Universe is indeed close to a trillion years old as I understand the estimates, wouldn't we be popsicles along with everything else? Lastly, Why are there huge mathematical absurdities with what both sides are claiming?

For anyone who has actually read my favorite book, it is utterly inconcievable that they could even consider the Flat Earth Fantasy. But today supposed scientists are blathering about a Flat Universe or a Warped Universe. Really! Where can I find the sources of that interesting mystery? Why are most newly discovered galaxies spiral? If Electro Motive Force is indeed the engine, where is it generated? Why do many ancient sources postulate a much different Solar System than we have today? It seems that at some point in the past both the lunar and solar year was synchronized with a simple 360 day year, and 12 months of 30 days each. This seems to me that we must have actually lost a spereical orbit because we now have an eliptical orbit. Assuming, this happened fairly recently say three thousand years ago, would the Earth's orbital velocity and rotational velocity have been altered? If so how long would our planet have taken to make a single rotation on our axis?

Please do not take offense! I am not debating here. In fact I no longer debate with anyone. As Sergeant Friday put it so eloquently; "Just the Facts, Ma'am."

If this makes me unwelcome, please advise me. Thank you for your kind attention, Brother Walt Gee, BiblicistBrother Walt (talk) 21:23, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

You seem tediously familiar
-- MtD Prematurely Indeterminate   22:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * "...tediously familiar."

Brother Walt (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2012 (UTC): My deep apologies for being "tediously familiar." That was not my intent at all. I        : unabashedly told you who and what I am. Dr. Chuck Missler whom I referenced can be easily found with just his name or by going to
 * Koinonia House.
 * Having read and reread your guidelines and helps, I seem to have come to the wrong place.
 * I am also not welcome at:
 * Conservapedia
 * Intitute for Creation Reaserch
 * Answers in Genesis
 * and many others, because I am viewed as a trouble maker at all, because I ask simple ??? !
 * We live in very interesting times where questioning observed and repeated scientific info is
 * Politically Incorrect to the nTH degree.


 * All I am interested in is rational reviewed scientific evidence such as The Hubble Telescope.
 * While I view discussion as okay; I do not view, a free for all angry debate as helpful to me.
 * It may feel good, but what does it really accomplish?
 * Please forgive my intrusion, brother waltBrother Walt (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Misspelled Word:
 * spereical should have been spherical. I actually would like to erase the mispelled word and
 * use the better word---ball shaped.:
 * FYI I do not adhere to any organized religion period.
 * Unwanted intrusion is not my balliwick. Asking questions about stuff I want answers for; IS!
 * Unwanted intrusion is not my balliwick. Asking questions about stuff I want answers for; IS!