Conservative Teen

The Conservative Teen was an American magazine that debuted to much derision in 2012. The contributors to the first issue included three members of the Heritage Foundation, two members of the Family Research Council, one from the Media Research Center, plus John Stossel, talk show host (Saint Ronnie's adopted son), and  of George Mason University.

That's right. A magazine written for today's teens by a bunch of right-wingers who clearly remember watching Apollo 11 land on the moon.

First issue contents
And what did these illustrious minds contribute to the debut issue? Well:


 * Michael Reagan wrote an article making the case that his father was in actuality the first black president.
 * Matt Philbin of the Media Research Center contributed two articles:
 * In one, he trashed the TV series Glee for promoting hardcore social liberalism.
 * In the other, he described how the liberal media spreads fear about global warming, which of course Philbin claims is a liberal lie.
 * Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council contributed the article "Why Abstinence Works And How It Can Work For You," which included the following little gem that is sure to become an instant classic among critics of conservative thought: "The vast majority of people will have sex at some time during their lives."
 * Editorial cartoonist Daryl Cagle contributed an article on how to draw President Obama without being criticized too much.
 * John Stossel wrote the article "Government Creates Poverty."
 * There is also a selection of books that the editors think would be great for school book reports, including books by Laura Ingraham, Newt Gingrich, and Dinesh D'Souza.
 * And the Media Research Center also placed an ad on the inside front cover showing anchorman Brian Williams of NBC Nightly News in the viewfinder of a studio camera. But in the background beyond the camera, Barack Obama's head has been Photoshopped over Williams'. The caption on the article reads "It's tough to tell who's talking sometimes..." Fuck you Brian Williams!

Oh, and whenever the magazine uses big words like "cameo," "eugenics," "smutty" or "contempt", it immediately supplies a definition of the word in (italics and parentheses). Not even as a footnote. They do it in the actual body of the article, just in case you're too dumb to know how footnotes work. This would be merely sad if it weren't for the fact that, in their Glee-bashing article (starts on page 6), they accuse the show of talking down to teenagers and acting like they can't behave responsibly, which elevates it to rank hypocrisy. (Even more hilariously, all the examples given came from that anti-Glee article, though rest assured, they're far from the only ones.)

So, if you know a teen who can't wait to be middle aged, bitter, inflexible, and relatively sexless, yearly subscriptions of this quarterly go for US$19.95.

And yet they seem to know little about the simplest concepts of magazine publishing
The premiere issue, which was released one week after the 2012 vernal equinox, was dated "Winter 2011." However, the convention in most of the English-speaking world is that the date on a magazine's cover (known as a "pull date") is the date when the magazine can be pulled from the newsstands and discarded. That's why a magazine dated "January 9" will hit the stands on January 2, or why a magazine dated "February" will appear at the beginning of January. Or, for that matter, why a magazine dated "Winter 2011" normally would've hit the stands during the last week of September or the first week of October, 2010, and then would've been pulled some time around Christmas 2010 or New Years Day 2011. Brilliant work!

Simply put, the date on the debut issue of The Conservative Teen should have been Summer, 2012.

Of course, when you have a propaganda rag to publish, you probably can't be bothered with small details like that.

If you can't stand the heat, don't publish a ridiculous magazine
With the magazine's debut on March 27, ridicule for the magazine spread across the internets,   even among conservatives. The publishers then did what any group of righteous fanatics caught in the act would do: they crashed their own website. What had been a full website, including a contributors page listing names, photos and affiliations to right-wing organizations, was replaced with a single blank homepage with the words "UNDER CONSTRUCTION" in the upper left corner. The online copy of the magazine had also been removed without a trace (or so they thought: somebody had the foresight to upload a copy of the magazine to Scribd).

While the magazine looked like a slick, expensive, over-the-top example of Poe's Law, it seems to have been legitimate. Rosie Gray of BuzzFeed interviewed Family Research Council spokesman Darin Miller and contributor Peter Sprigg about the magazine, and both confirmed its legitimacy. Sprigg even said that he had bought a subscription for his poor teenage son.

Still, it's possible that the magazine actually was a brilliant example of Poe's Law—one that was unwittingly bankrolled and written by the very people who it was meant to satirize. If so, then to whoever cooked up this terrific little money pit of an idea, bravo!