Talk:Answers Research Journal

Discover Magazine's article
I am amazed that the reply comments come down so heavily pro AIJ. That anyone can have the dexterity and nous to operate a computer and at the same time believe their guff really astounds me. Susan purrrrr  18:06, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 * I think it is because the nutjobs are running around defending their new baby. They would be far more energized, and be searching for blog-mentions, etc.  I'd say, just give it time.  Those people aren't at Discover because they like the magazine, they are there because it mentioned their baby. human  18:22, 3 March 2008 (EST)

Backdoor plug: I've written quite a bit about these bozos, e.g. here. -- -PalMD -- 16:33, 30 July 2008 (EDT)

subpages
As the primary contributor to this page, I do not like the subpages idea for this. If ARJ really takes off and has tons of articles, maybe, but people don't read subpages. Sterilewalkie-talkie 21:52, 16 February 2009 (EST) (On the other hand, I'm willing to go the way of the mob.  Other ideas for organization are appreciated.  I've considered ranking in categories, but have never gotten that off the ground.)  Sterilewalkie-talkie 22:32, 16 February 2009 (EST)
 * Well one rollback now is all it takes for it to return. - User   23:28, 16 February 2009 (EST)
 * Please, I don't mind discussing this. It's probably a good idea and I'm full of shit.  I just don't like it.  But we can disagree.  Sterilewalkie-talkie 18:37, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * (Or we can just have multiple pages with the same content apparently....) Please discuss. Sterilewalkie-talkie 22:38, 19 February 2009 (EST)

Plush toy?
What - if anything - does the reference to a plush toy in a recent RW poll mean? VOX HUMANA  05:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * See Vol 5. After you put your drink down, of course. Peter mqzp 05:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh my. (I sincerely appreciated the warning about the drink.) VOX  HUMANA  06:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Science
Wow, they've really given up even pretending to be a science journal. It's all scriptual analysis at this point. talk 15:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Repeat authorship
Perhaps including what the usual numbers would be would help. The number 70% on its own means little. User:K61824User_talk:K61824 01:41, 16 December 2015 (UTC)