User:Bayes/CPpage

"Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem." --John Ponce

My 2 cents

 * Quotes should be used to support a particular thesis, not compose a thesis.
 * Opposing arguments should be honestly and completely defined before attempting to refute them.

What Conservapedia could be

 * A place for discussion of conservative ideas.
 * A place for someone to go to get the conservative perspective, especially on high-profile issues.

What Conservapedia is

 * A groupthink-based project that essentially functions to stoke those who already subscribe to the American fundamentalist Christian philosophy, rather than to engage in dialog with those who do not.
 * A haven from which to launch attacks on people and belief systems different from that ideology.
 * A place where scholarship contrary perceived as contrary to that ideology is maligned, rather than respected, discussed, and honestly argued against.

Articles that could use a better representation of the topic at hand before the refutation kicks in

 * Theory of Evolution
 * Theory of Relativity
 * Atheism
 * Abortion
 * Homosexuality
 * Communism
 * Richard Dawkins

The Gay Section (listed in no particular order)
An asterisk (*) indicates the articles that I personally think are worth having in an encyclopedia. That doesn't that mean I necessarily endorse their current content.

The "Are You Kidding Me" Section

 * Gay Bomb and its talk page.