User talk:Human/sandbox

(moved odd discussion of goons, sellers, etc. to Talk:Audiophile

Best of luck ;-p  Susan  purrrrr ...  16:50, 11 December 2007 (EST)
 * Hah! This version came via a circuitous route - assfly whined that people were banned from WP for saying they were xtian - so I followed the link to some user page.  I guess I was looking at diffs, and someone added a collapsing box around an inclusion of a subpage.  But it obviously depends on a few things we don't have.  Recursion time! human  17:26, 11 December 2007 (EST)

homeschool sandbox issues
Human, do you even know what "rational" means? SHahB 21:12, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Bohdan, do you even know what "user space" means? human  21:19, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
 * The rule is for userpages, right? If not, then I apologize. SHahB 21:19, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Sub pages are generally respected as being part of the user page. Your apology is accepted, no harm done.  Anyway, I'm not sure if this one is worth doing, so I want to see what I can make of it before foisting it on others to improve. What was I typing (besides everything I ever type) that makes you think I don't know what "rational" means? human  21:23, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
 * You didn't remove my remark about tmt (#17 though its probably true). I recommend leaving it in until he denies it. SHahB 21:24, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

by saying "rational response" you are implying their position is irrational. I hope you realize that you can disagree with someone without them being irrational. SHahB 21:27, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Ah, I see. It's just a placeholder for when we do these things in the public space, so people can tell where to edit. You should see what it says (the template) where the points being refuted or mocked go... human  21:39, 30 April 2008 (EDT)

Open for discussion
As I said on the main talk page, I am trying to figure out what to do with this. Just because I "made it", I don't think it necessarily deserves publication on RW. But perhaps it does. Locations (ie, namespace) and titles would be welcome. Also, for the time being, I will open it up to editing by the mob. Thank you for your participation.  ħ uman  00:20, 16 June 2008 (EDT)


 * In the words of Graham Chapman of Monty Python, "This has become very silly." Would you argue too terribly if I stole your coding and posted a more down to earth critique in the same style? SirChuckB  03:32, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 * If I copied it to a main space, you could edit it anyway you want... care to suggest a title?  ħ uman  03:45, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Actually I was thinking of working on it in a sandbox and then presenting it for approval. SirChuckB  03:53, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Whatever you want to do is fine, of course. And copying this to your own sandbox wouldn't be "stealing", this wiki uses the GFDL.  Feel free to use whatever you want of it.  ħ uman  14:46, 16 June 2008 (EDT)