Category talk:Jounalists

We already have a Journalism category. Do we need two cats for a subject we have very few articles for?  w easeLOId ~ 08:10, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm not sure that we really need a misspelled category at all. Debate anyone? Генгис    08:30, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Keep. This is a category for people who work for "jounas" the ancient Sanskrit word for "teh internet".  Consequently we need this category. (some guy at work)
 * I didn't even notice the spelling error! Anyway, I've emptied it of the one article that was in this cat.  It can either be deleted or left a a misspelled empty category. . . .   w easeLOId [[Image: Weaselly.jpg|15px]]~ 11:12, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Typical! That's the sort of high-handed unilateral action that sets of headless chicken mode. We need a due process for correcting errors. Генгис    11:24, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
 * OK then, I'll put it back in.  w easeLOId [[Image: Weaselly.jpg|15px]]~ 11:27, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I killed it.  16:29, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
 * See what I mean! :) Генгис    16:45, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Per Weaseloid's comment above, I think it's time we formulated some sort of policy regarding the use of "people-based" categories (e.g. journalists,, , etc) and the use of ideology-based categories (e.g. , , , etc). As it stands, whenever I categorize an article, I am never sure whether to cat (for example) Richard Dawkins as "atheism" or "atheist", or both.   16:57, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
 * That's a good example, because as far as I'm concerned there doesn't need to be an "atheists" category; they could just go in "atheism". I don't think every person necessarily has to be categorised in person-related categories.  My own feeling is that there are a few too many categories, some of which are unnecessary.  It would be easier to manage categorisation (& hence easier to find articles) if a few of the overlapping/duplicating categories were cut out.   w easeLOId [[Image: Weaselly.jpg|15px]]~ 17:05, 16 October 2008 (EDT)
 * As I pointed out elsewhere (category:Atheists) people should go into a sub category of people and a sub category of a related subject if necessary. So the category:journalists should be a member of category:people and also a member of Генгис   03:00, 17 October 2008 (EDT)