Conservapedia talk:Burning the Evidence/DawkinsTalk0932 20Oct07

It's a pain, but someone should try to nowiki out the red links in this sometime... nice job capturing it!

Oh, and PS, what I love is that they can't claim copyright infringement, since they don't have a copy on their site to prove they ever wrote it! human  12:49, 27 October 2007 (EDT)
 * I have screenshots (no source, must have overwritten by accident with an earlier, butchered version. /tear) dated the 23rd, that has 14 points in the ToC instead of 8. Could they be used in any way? :/  Norseman Wassail!   16:10, 27 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Wow, nice job on the redlinks, Norseman!!! That must have been hard work... human  17:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Didn't take long, please don't groom me. :P  Norseman Wassail!   18:52, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

Should I add everything that was dated October 23, or just the parts missing from the archives? I'd like get 50,000 green points (no idea wtf they are)!  Norseman Wassail!   13:02, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
 * Ows about you stick it all in but highlight the excised bits? Susan  You don't have to talk, but ...  13:05, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
 * That's what she said.
 * Sorry, had to say it. No prob, I'll highlight the deep-burns a blue-ishy colour, unless stated otherwise.  Norseman Wassail!   13:18, 1 November 2007 (EDT)

For some reason, the entries near the bottom auto-indent and I don't know why. It's supposed to look like this. There's some coding I didn't clean up due to sheer laziness, but that self-indention crap is annoying. Oh, and the color... change it if you want.  Norseman <font color = "0000EE">Wassail!   00:07, 2 November 2007 (EDT)