Conservapedia talk:Paranoia on CP

Am assuming that "Bender" was named after the Futurama character. Round these parts, "bender" has a, shall we say, less salubrious meaning that probably should have had him blocked on sight...XD

But yes, there seems to be some rather overzealous banhammering going on over there. Trashbat 10:08, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Can anyone explain this? I am sure much of it is just paranoia, but it seems like they ban EVERYONE who comes through the door. (Reminds me of that test in Seven Samurai, but I digress....) Why are they doing that? I can't believe it is all icewedge, or somebody here. Hell, I haven't edited there in a week or so.  ʄĹїþþїɲ ;-) 10:16, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Sometimes it seems that karajoo and other sysops constantly hit refresh on the new users page and block away. Paranoia really does run deep over there.  I sorta feel bad for those users who do with to contribute, but had the misfortune of picking a name that is somehow offensive to the insecure group there. Jrssr5 10:22, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
 * My money is on paranoia despite the fact that CP has no entry on paranoia...XD Either that or perhaps they feel they have enough trustworthy users now not to require the services of any more! I've not been very active over there in a few weeks now either, that'll larn 'em to be so ungrateful for my contributions! Trashbat 10:24, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Around lunch time (EDT) I guess things get slow at the mall or it's lunchtime for Karajou, he'll do four or five blocks in ten to fifteen minutes and take a break until quittin time (around 3:30pm). CЯacke ® 10:59, 15 June 2007 (CDT)

I do know who Bender is from Futurama... and that he should NOT be on television ;) DanH 16:29, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Is this article supposed to have more things added to it? Can anyone add examples? Is it really ok to name names? Ben 20:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Yes, anyone is allowed to edit...not that your edit will definitely STAND, but neither will you be blocked for "naming names". Some articles here will languish for a time but usually someone will write something. Have a whack at it, by all means. CЯacke ®  20:41, 26 June 2007 (CDT)

This article need category or moving--PalMD-Goatspeed! 21:52, 6 July 2007 (CDT)

Delete
2-line stillborn article. There's plenty of other evidence of CP's paranoia elsewhere. -- Ψ Gremlin  15:28, 16 November 2010 (UTC)