Conservapedia talk:SubHuman Cabal

Gotta say, if you wrote this all yourself, GREAT JOB!DocSock 07:08, 1 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Agreed. This is actually a pretty good article, and deserves to be in the mainspace.  One thing to fix, though - there are about 3 "EL" type footnotes, while the others are "ref" style.  They should all be "ref" formatted, shouldn't they?  Add a few cats, and a little snark about the actual title as a "last" or "first" section, and it will be a shining example of something. human be in 18:48, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
 * I'm pretty sure we have this same article under Untermensch and that it is a WP c and p. Needs TLC.--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 20:40, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Ah, that explains 1. why it's pretty good (for what it's about, at least), 2. the non-RWish redlinks, and 3. why it doesn't address TK's building up of the phrase "SubHuman Cabal". C & p isn't supposed to be the thing we want a shining example of... thanks. human be in 20:48, 8 October 2007 (EDT)


 * I'm gonna set a fictitious countdown for modification or deletion of this article. And maybe even try to fix it myself.--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 19:17, 9 October 2007 (EDT)