Template talk:Unmerged

This should also allow for a link to the archive in question at RW:dup. art.  ħ uman  19:09, 10 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Maybe. . . .  w easeLOId [[Image: Weaselly.jpg|15px]]~ 19:38, 10 October 2008 (EDT)
 * The point being, the reason we are doing this is to preserve the history, not to show that another article name redirects. Right now, it doesn't even say "&redirect=no", so when you click on the link you go to the "current" page.  So it takes three clicks to get to the history.  So, first, there should be a link to the "old" article history.  Then, doesn't it make sense to have a direct link to the archived discussion?  I guess not, really.  The history is what matters.  I'll see if I can fix the link so it goes straight there.  Brain cramp, wrong template.  Yes, we should have a link to when we decided, and how, to not merge the articles.  It should be easy, as long as we remove the markup from the header.  ħ uman  21:06, 10 October 2008 (EDT)