Thread:User talk:Armondikov/Flattered - or annoyed/reply (14)

I'm happy to admit I'm wrong when I am. I do it here all the time.

Here, I'll explain why your attempt at making a point failed and why I'm laughing at you this time: ☞ You write an article. ☞ So and so says it's off-mission. (Leave out the part where you swear at her and everyone else who's criticized your writing) ☞ You then go around and start tagging So and so's article as off-mission. ☞ So and So's articles are not your articles. So and so's articles are not sufficiently similar to your article to treat them identically. ☞ Asserting that So and so's articles are off-mission is not an argument that your article is on-mission; whether So and so's article are off-mission has nothing to do with whether your articles are off-mission.

If you wish to have the different and separate discussions of (a) whether So and so's articles are off-mission or even (b) what missioniality is and whether it should be changed to accommodate your article, that's a different and separate discussion which also says nothing about whether your article is on-mission.

I look at what you do and how your interpersonal interactions are generally contrary to common sense, good decorum, and every established folkway at RW, and I sincerely wonder what's wrong with you. What's wrong with you?