Template talk:Sources needed

Title: one that no one will ever remember. How about "sources needed"? 04:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * That seems fine to me. 04:30, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Or in RW internet slang "moar sauces plz" 08:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Let's go easy with this template, I know we want sources, but many articles are simply written by people who know what they are talking about. There might be be better, subtler ways to get sources. 09:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, though this is useful for flagging up ones that are either A) completely devoid of refs and further reading (I have to say that I'm more for "further reading" than I am for referenced statements), such as the Nietzsche one I just added it to as a test or B) are complete fact-tag soup, which I don't think we have because we're often a little sparse with that. 09:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Hate this template
It doesn't say what needs to be cited. TyAnnoy 18:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Everything, surely? Peter Monomorium antarcticum 18:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It's slightly cleaner than making fact-soup out of an article. Scarlet A.pngnarchist 18:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)