User talk:TheAmazingSkeptic

Welcome &#60;-𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈-&#62; (talk) 23:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. How pleasant of a person you must be. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 23:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks
Appreciated. Hipocritehasaphone (talk) 00:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Ha, love it. Not very wise though. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 01:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."
Sadly, the scientific method disagrees. :/ 142.124.55.236 (talk) 23:08, 10 December 42015 AQD (UTC)
 * I don't know what you boys are arguing about, but at the core of things, one always starts with observation - not hypothesis. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

TheArrogantSkeptic
Why do you demote somebody after a grand total of two edits? Autopatrolled status is usually given after at least a few days, during which the editor in question has shown themselves not to be completely insane. I'm not saying that TheArrogantSkeptic is insane, but I'd recommend waiting a bit until they've shown themselves to be at least somewhat competent. --JorisEnter (talk) 23:13, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppet. The Captcha is annoying. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 23:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Q: Why have sockpuppet? 23:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * A: So "they" can't find him, I guess. "They" being well know to us. --JorisEnter (talk) 23:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppets are not banned as I understand, only using them to add votes. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 23:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * So effectively, you're just manipulating votes. Totally not cheaty or anything. --JorisEnter (talk) 23:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't quite understand? Are you saying I've manipulated votes? .-. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 23:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * What then did you mean by "Only using them to add votes"? --JorisEnter (talk) 23:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If someone used a main account as well as sockpuppets to vote, that would be a violation. Just having them is not a problem, at least it never used to be. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 23:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Then why the heck do you use them? If they are only for voting (do you have even more sockpuppets?), why not simply use your main account for that? --JorisEnter (talk) 23:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I have them because they amuse me. Sometimes I use them to vote, but when I do I only use one. Using more than one account to vote for the same thing is a violation. Again, this is how I understand it something might've changed. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 23:37, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

IDK about voting and I don't want to ban you. Asking why you made it. ;P 00:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I did not think you wanted to ban me, I was talking to Joris mostly. I simply have them because I like them, I have several. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 00:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

I love you
A lot. Jaboc Solve (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Quick question
Triggered much? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 21:56, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Very angry that my Hammer & Sickle shirt has still not arrived in the mail. TheAmazingSkeptic (talk) 21:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If only you could seize the memes of production! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Promoted
I have taken away your mop. Edits such as this and this one aren't exactly appreciated.--JorisEnter (talk) 11:42, 25 November 2016 (UTC)