Talk:Appropriate technology

Off-mission?
This suspiciously looks like Tweenk's contributions, but with the opposite sign. :)--ZooGuard (talk) 07:29, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Very tenuous connection to our mission (if there is a connection at all)
 * Orphan (no pages link to this one)
 * Um, I have no relation with Tweenk. Anyway, I saw your category Category:Technology, if Role-playing game is on-mission, what is the problem with it? Whether you like this view or oppose it, that is not a reason to delete it, that is a reason to edit the article to add opposing arguments. --Monkey Editor (talk) 07:35, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah that role-playing game article should be vapped. -  π    13:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It's luddism. --62.142.167.134 (talk) 07:37, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Related, but AT is part of luddism, luddism is a broader concept. --Monkey Editor (talk) 07:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * BTW, AT has influence on several other social movements, so it is a perfectly valid article. --Monkey Editor (talk) 07:39, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Really. I can't tell that from the article. If you added more information it would help the reader understand the reasons against this better, at the moment I go, "yeah that sounds alright, so what?". -  π    13:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)