Talk:Russell Humphreys

Needed?
Is this really needed? Locke   Always Watching...... 19:05, 28 August 2007 (CDT)
 * It sucks as an article right now but I could certainly see having a good article written about him. 19:07, 28 August 2007 (CDT)
 * You see really alot of strange things don't you? Bohdan 19:08, 28 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Just the colors... 19:12, 28 August 2007 (CDT)
 * I'll have a bash at writing something up, and linking it to the existing Humphrey's related articles. I think he deserves a page, since he is referenced by major creationists, such as AIG. If there's no serious update by the end of October, then chances are I forgot to do this.--Concernedresident 13:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

That Voyager episode, "Blink of an Eye"
"The Voyager crew encounter a planet experiencing a gravity induced time dilation effect, in which the passage of a minute for the ship in orbit would translate in to hours or days on the planet's surface. Anyone visiting the planet for a few hours could return to the ship and find that years have passed for the crew of the ship."

Aren't these two sentences contradicting each other? I think the second sentence is supposed to say "Anyone visiting the planet for a number of years could return to the ship and find that only a few hours had passed for the crew of the ship." In fact, that's exactly what The Doctor did in the episode in question. Apokalyps2547 (talk) 22:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

"Model for magnetic-field formation" section
We only talk about the theory itself, not any problems OR supports of said theory (other than Jupiter). Can we fix? 18:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what there is to talk about. Given that it's blatantly not scientific in the first place (transmutation, etc.), there's not much to be said about it. When the answer comes down to "God flipped a magic switch and then everything worked," there's not much one can say. As for support, there isn't any, since again, it's entirely unscientific. - Grant (talk) 18:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * My problem is that what you just said needs to be said in the article, but currently is not. 00:21, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, well you can feel free to just add that yourself. I doubt many folks would take issue with a change like that. :) - Grant (talk) 03:17, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Droppings from a YEC
By a guy named .--JorisEnter (talk) 13:32, 7 May 2016 (UTC)