Talk:Lists of creationist scientists

Werner Gitt
Werner Gitt is not a doctor of mathematics. He is a doctor of engineering. See: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werner_Gitt#Lebenslauf Besides, saying he was working in information science is misleading. His work in PTB was not research in information science, he was "Direktor des Fachbereichs Informationstechnologie der Abteilung für Wissenschaftlich-Technische Querschnittsaufgaben innerhalb der Physikalisch-Technischen Bundesanstalt in Braunschweig" , which basically means he was the leader of the data center of PTB. 89.204.130.29 (talk) 23:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update. He was only listed as such because he was described that way by AIG. Fixing! 23:33, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Silver or higher?
This article looks silver or higher to me. Thoughts? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Merge?
Has the content of this list already been merged? If so, it's time we delete that article and make it a redirect to here, so it's all in one place. If some things from it aren't added, they should be added here instead (and then it should be made a redirect). Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * No, they haven't. It's B/C ASDFD is about 1400 names and converting it and putting everything in alphabetical order is a pain in the ass. 23:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, why is ASDFD's markup fucked up at the moment?--JorisEnter (talk) 23:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

B/C I was porting it over but got called away. The regexes I used are: from \*([^ ;]*) ([^,;]*), (.*) to |-style="background:#FFCCCC;" 00:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * $2, $1
 * DI
 * $3
 * No (Field)
 * No (Field)
 * No (Field)
 * No (Field)

The Truth About PhD Creationists

 * Worthwhile. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Worthwhile. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Title
If they are Creationists, surely they're not scientists, but pseudoscientists. Wilder Bicycle 20:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Not necessarily. Someone can have a legitimate background in a field like engineering, yet adopt pseudoscientific views on other subjects. Much like it's perfectly possible for a genius to misuse their intellect in the service of nonsense. --Ismailov (talk) 13:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)