User talk:Stabby the Misanthrope/Archive5

I have mocked you!
21:45, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Did you just leave a very important message mocking me?  21:48, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, and I did it again just now. 21:57, 22 June 2008 (EDT)

I have left a message on your talk page
21:57, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I find myself growing annoyed...  22:01, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Why? Don't be mean :P 22:05, 22 June 2008 (EDT)

I have left a very important comment on your talk page regarding important messages on your talk page, with a new sub-header.
I have left a very important comment on your talk page regarding important messages on your talk page, with a new sub-header.  ħ uman  23:23, 22 June 2008 (EDT)

I have sent you a very important flan
I think my favourite part is writing these bits :) 14:36, 23 June 2008 (EDT)

I hate writing everything three times
I hate writing everything three times.
 * What in God's name are you talking about?  15:20, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Look at the edit comment -- that makes three in total. And be nice to my flan. 15:33, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * A word in your ear:

C H A O S!
 * 16:37, 23 June 2008 (EDT)

My name is better than yours
17:39, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I reject that. Also, mine is original.  You, on the other hand, would be hard-pressed to find any site that doesn't already have every variation of Chaos registered.  So, : P   17:56, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I reject that. Usernames based on "radioactive [noun]" are quite common. So there. 18:00, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * But they aren't snapped up quite so quickly as "Chaos"-themed names.  18:38, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I've never seen any chaos-themed names before. And certainly none as outspoken as "Chaos!". 18:50, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Try registering on Gmail with any name containing "Chaos". I guarantee all the appealing and even just tolerable ones are taken.   18:53, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * The exclamation mark makes it special! Chaos!! 18:57, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I have to agree with RA here. His username is clearly more original. Usernames with 'radioactive' may be common enough, but a radioactive afikomen? I don't think so. -- AKjeldsen Potential fundamentalist! 19:03, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Thank you, AK.  19:04, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Heresy! Haven't you seen the advert where a disembodied voice asks a child what their favourite word is and they say declare "Chaos!" ...? It's a classic! I think you're both missing the context. The subtle, subtle context. 19:07, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Can't say I have. -- AKjeldsen Potential fundamentalist! 19:08, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * So... the context is that you're a child?  19:33, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * In a sense, maybe.
 * Don't make me button you. 19:36, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm not that mean, RA. 19:59, 23 June 2008 (EDT)

Peyote button
Aaaaaaah, that's better!  ħ uman  20:29, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * No, this is better!  20:56, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Button! 20:59, 23 June 2008 (EDT)

Ending
Ingrate.:P Assfly kills his mother and is thus liberated. How you get there is up to you. It's dramatic gold, I tells ya. Gold! --Helena Bonham Carter 19:43, 23 June 2008 (EDT)

Sandalism
You've made me very happy. 21:25, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Anytime.  23:54, 23 June 2008 (EDT)

<3s
For being a great blog commenter and giving me nice compliments. Yay RA!- 22:10, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Thank you and you're welcome!  23:54, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Don't forget to wash your hands!  ħ uman  00:40, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 * There's a dog loose in the woods... 01:00, 24 June 2008 (EDT
 * Royal flush! All in!  ħ uman  02:28, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

How dare you block me!
271 seconds? You truly are a fruitcake. 12:42, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 * How dare you edit my talk page and leave a little red exclamation point by it! : P   12:44, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I had nearly forgotten about them. How time flies.
 * Isn't my new signature divine?? 12:50, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Actually, no, because it requires me to strain my eyes.  19:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Aw. 19:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Once again, I have to agree with RA. It is... not very easy on the eyes, as they say. -- AKjeldsen Potential fundamentalist! 19:37, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 * That's exactly what I was going for. Next, I'm going to make bits flash! 19:44, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Please don't do that. Think of the innocent children. :-( -- AKjeldsen Potential fundamentalist! 19:45, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 * You must embrace the chaos! 19:50, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I embrace chaos on an hourly basis, I just don't want to have to look at blinking text all the time. That's so... mid-90's. -- AKjeldsen Potential fundamentalist! 19:55, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Embracing chaos in keeping with a regular schedule seems a mite tokenistic to me, Amaranth.
 * And I was only going to make the palest colours blink. You'd hardly notice until your eyes start watering. 20:02, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

Incidentally!
My signature looks right now (at last). Feel free to rhapsodise over its beauty. 13:09, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
 * You know, you're one of the few people here that actually uses a template for their signature. Aside from you and me, everyone here stamps the raw code.   13:13, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I know -- we are a cut above the riff-raff, RA :)
 * It annoys me when Human does that, because on RC it looks like he's written quite a long comment, but then when I get onto the page it turns out to be ":)" with a gargantuan signature next to it. Transclusion, people! Don't make me sting you! 13:16, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, my sig is "half" a template - all the random crap is tucked away safely. One of these days I'll cram it all into one new template...  ħ uman  22:27, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * "Aside from you and I", not "me". :nods: -- AKjeldsen Potential fundamentalist! 14:18, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
 * @ Mr. "  AKjeldsen Potential fundamentalist! ": That's just nitpickery.  The most important part of language (aside from the obvious one of communicating an idea effectively) is getting it to "sound right", emphasizing rhythm and flow.  That takes precedence over unnecessary minutiae.   15:28, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Precisely! And as it happens, "you and me" sounds wrong, too. -- AKjeldsen Potential fundamentalist! 15:40, 25 June 2008 (EDT)

Please unblock Bohdan
00:22, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * But "Bohdan" (= SHahB) is not blocked....?  ħ uman  00:47, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Bohdan2 is. 00:50, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * No he isn't.  ħ uman  01:02, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Ah, I see, you unblocked him. I blocked him for this, which is the most offensive thing I've seen Bohdan do in his time here.   01:22, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Actually, my most offensive stuff was before your time. Bohdan2 22:14, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * If anyone is wondering what that image was prior to deletion... well, it wasn't anything particularly exciting. Essentially, it was a short-sighted child. I'm not really sure why RA found it so offensive -- I can only assume he is being facetious :) 05:53, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * It wasn't a particularly flattering picture... alright, I'll be forthcoming: the picture struck me as so unappealing that I thought the kid was autistic or something, and this was Bohdan making fun of Ames.  Suffice to say, if I thought I could've gotten away with it, I would have banned every Bohdan account for a damn long time.  I was feeling a little too defensive of a comrade, I guess.  Later, I rethought it and didn't say why I found the picture so offensive, because it occurred to me the kid in it was "normal" and it's just an unflattering shot of him.   05:59, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I just assumed it was a pretty insult with no real offensive quality. I guess I just know Bohdan too well -- a frightening thought :) 06:02, 26 June 2008 (EDT)

That picture was Ames you idiot. . Bohdan2 21:22, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * But that's worse, Bohdan! That's only a couple of steps away from stalking! 22:10, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I got the link from his own talk page. An IP posted it there before your time. Bohdan2 22:14, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Not stalking then, but still vaguely creepy. I'm watching you :P 22:18, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 * You know, if you block someone for a reason like that, a link or two really helps other sysops figure out why you did it. When I saw the reason was simply "Bohdan" I not only unblocked him, I deleted that block reason.  ħ uman  22:25, 26 June 2008 (EDT)

User:Radiation Afikomen
If I rename them to something harmless so I can unblock, will you register the doppelganger? Or should I register it and email you the password?  ħ uman  20:26, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Which doppelganger is this? 20:31, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
 * The one referenced in the header. Check the current blocks.  ħ uman  21:22, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Do you mean "Radiation Afikomen"? One of the Littlefish accounts? 21:34, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, yeah, that. Sorry, correcting header now...  ħ uman  21:43, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't think renaming is really necessary in this case, Human. No one is really going to mistake any of the Littlefishers for the users they're supposed to copying. 22:13, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

Wow.
I thought you were dead. 14:47, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I can't take a wiki-break without you pining for me? I'm touched.   14:54, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Nah, we were just hoping we could steal your office equipment. -- 14:56, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Jellyfish don't pine. We oak.
 * If I might be permitted to flog a dead horse, you were thinking of parrots. 14:59, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * "Flogging a dead jellyfish" is more relevant, given the circumstances.  18:47, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

You forgot something...
It starts with "Jelly" and ends with "blog". Two guesses. 02:09, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Uh, Jellyalkfjdaslfjalkblog? Am I right?   02:23, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * For each incorrect answer, I will kill one of your sockpuppets. You're not doing that well so far. 02:29, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Is it Jellyedpickleburgerblog?  03:05, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I am a sysop at the moment, actually. Thanks for reminding me! 03:13, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * And I described your blog for you, since you did mine. No need for thanks, ma'am. 03:15, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, thank you, Chaos. And is the blog you claim I forgot Jellyedtoastblog?   03:38, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You're going the right way for a stinging :P 03:43, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You're harsh, choass, you are : )   03:45, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Thanks. Without the smiling face, I would've been hurt by your insensitive name-calling. You bully. 03:52, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed, you fascist pig.  04:03, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Drive-by template
Well, HG wasn't really a drive-by. He was around for quite a long time and contributed quite a lot of garbage interesting content, mostly in the form of essays as he couldn't get his insanity remarkable views into articles.--Bobbing up 15:17, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * "Drive-by" is kind of inaccurate anyways. The fact that the essay was by a "drive-by" editor is irrelevant—if the essay had promoted atheism we would have fawned over it and begged its author to stay.  The actual message RationalWikians are trying to send with the template is "we don't like this essay".  And that certainly applies to most/any essays by HeartOfGold.   15:23, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Well maybe if his essays had done something to promote these ideas:  1. Analyzing and refuting the anti-science movement. 2. Analyzing and refuting the full range of crank ideas.  3. Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism. we would have fawned over them.--Bobbing up 15:30, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Erhm.
What do you think about this article?

RationalWiki:List of users who have discovered RW because of Richard Lenski

Or a reword of such.

Also, BOOYAH. -- *Gen. S.T. Shrink*  Get to the bunker  01:34, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't see any need for it. We don't have a "List of users who discovered RationalWiki via Conservapedia", either, and we don't need to. We have all the information we need in the format we need it at RationalWiki:How I found RationalWiki.   01:43, 3 July 2008 (EDT)

I tried to wandalise your user page...
But you've locked it... You flan. Now there's a type of cake no one likes! 01:40, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Ha! I knew that lock would come in handy one day.   01:45, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * My entire family ('cept me) likes flan, you spineless mass of protoplasm.  01:45, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Hmmm. How about torte? 01:53, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Are you kidding me? Torte is the best!   01:54, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Sigh. Work with me here, Radiowaves.
 * What about Battenburg? Carrot cake (I love carrot cake)? Gingerbread? Seed cake? Tiramisu? Victoria Sponge? 02:01, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Not that I have any business in the conversation, but I'm partial to Red Velvet. -- *Gen. S.T. Shrink*  Get to the bunker  02:03, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * What the hell cake is Red Velvet? 02:04, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Only teh greyhtehst cake evar!!! -- *Gen. S.T. Shrink*  Get to the bunker  02:06, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Would that be British flan or American flan? I understand there is a difference. -- 02:22, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I am not aware of this difference. All I know is flan is rubbish. You should be suggesting Danish cakes for us, Mr Eldsen. 02:25, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * It's a hybrid flan. Created from the finest stock on both sides of the pond.   02:28, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I see. To be honest, I'm hard pressed to recall any specifically Danish cakes - I'm pretty sure most of them are actually German. -- 02:33, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, that's pretty much the same thing, innit'? : )   02:36, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I can confirm your ruthless oversimplification, Radman. 02:39, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * More or less, yes. It's true. -- 02:40, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Half of Europe is gothic in the end anyways.  02:41, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Is not. 02:44, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Is too!  02:46, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Not. Not, not, not. Lalala la la... Not. 02:47, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Uh, gentlemen. These are very complex... -- 02:50, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You took my incompleteness post rather to heart, didn't you Anders? These are very complex... what? 02:59, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * ...questions. -- 03:01, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Are not. 03:10, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Are too. -- 03:16, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Are too!  04:43, 3 July 2008 (EDT)

By now, my associates have eaten all of your jam...
Surrender the Crystal at once, or I shall instruct them to continue on to the tuna. 11:51, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * That's not tuna, silly. It's chicken salad.   15:27, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Yeuch. I hate chicken. And salad.
 * Forgive my typos, I am sending this from a computer made from meccano(sic?) 15:31, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Are you trying to say "made in Mexico"?  15:34, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * What? Of course not. Haven't you heard of Meccano? 15:42, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You hate chicken, you hate goats, you hate Tori Amos... what sort of a strange person are you? Do you not know what is good in life? -- 15:58, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Counter-intuitive indents! 16:12, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Anyone who hates goats and children can't be all that bad.  17:20, 3 July 2008 (EDT)

Colour copying
Try this to copy colours in future. 15:19, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Hallelujah—thank you Susan!  15:26, 3 July 2008 (EDT)

You fail at invitation
Both those IP users have already signed up here. You fail, Afikoman. 05:36, 7 July 2008 (EDT)
 * No. I'm just so good that the reverberations from my inviting welcome reached back and affected the past, making it so that they would sign up.   05:38, 7 July 2008 (EDT)
 * What you describe as "obsessive" is merely a measured and appropriate response to a complex environment. By the way, I made you a :P   05:49, 7 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You may call yourself the Grand Poobah of the Internets if you want, Chaos. That doesn't change the facts.   05:55, 7 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You're right. I surrender. 06:12, 7 July 2008 (EDT)
 * There's something you don't see every day. -- 06:53, 7 July 2008 (EDT)
 * It was a false surrender. 06:59, 7 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I should have guessed. -- 07:26, 7 July 2008 (EDT)

Invitation
Javascap 06:55, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

Oh Hi
Greetings, Radioactive afikomen. I haven't checked my talk page in a while, so I just got around to seeing your message. Yes, I am Reulaux's fraternal twin brother. Indeed. Well, that's about it for me. Peace! YB indeed! 15:13, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

Actually...
She moved the original Jesus article to Fun:Jesus, so that was what the link should have pointed to to begin with. Although the move itself was completely unnecessary. Perhaps you should revert that? 18:41, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I shall.  18:44, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Nevermind, she never moved the article in the first place.  18:45, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You fail. 18:57, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Huh. I guess I skimmed right past it.   19:01, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

Three hours is a bit steep y'know.
I'm just saying. 19:29, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I'll reduce it.  19:31, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Five minutes seems about right. :) 19:33, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

UNBLOCK THE IP OF User:Jellyfish
UNBLOCK THE IP OF User:Jellyfish &mdash; Unsigned, by: 66.90.73.125 / talk / contribs
 * I thought I did? Hang on, lemme check.   21:44, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Some other user fixed it, you had unblocked my account but not my ip --Jellyfish 22:05, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I apologize—sorry about that, Jellyfish.  22:08, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

Why?
Would you want to block my IP? Is there some rule that sez I've got to log in to edit? Crookedmouth 08:20, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Not at all. Some editors (such as myself) just find it annoying to edit while accidentally logged out.  It's also for privacy reasons, to prevent others from knowing your IP.  I was trying to be helpful  :' (   11:09, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Don't cry! I was just a bit surprised that you can edit while logged out. Crookedmouth 13:47, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Me? Cry?  I am a manly man, and manly men do not cry.  Except when we really feel like it.  : )   13:56, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I take it you don't want your IP blocked, then?  13:56, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Actually yes, please. I have access to a few computers, one of which I don't want to log in from for various reasons, and to be honest I shouldn't edit from at all (i.e. the IP you're talking about). I was actually quite surprised that it let me edit at all so it would be useful if you could block it please.
 * Your smilie was crying so I thought I'd upset you. I was all ready to offer you a hankie and a manly (not gay!!) shoulder to cry on. :-D Crookedmouth 02:13, 11 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Actually, we can only block editing "by that IP" - if you log in from there you can still edit. We can't "block logging in" so you'll have to enforce your own discipline there.  ħ uman  03:11, 11 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, anyways, I went ahead and blocked the IP in question. Feel free to ask someone to unblock it at any time.   03:36, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Ta
ThanQ for the little tidy up on my talk page :D Spica the Hiver  If you tolerate this, then your children will be next... 18:18, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You're welcome!  18:35, 10 July 2008 (EDT)

Just to let you know
I am bitching about your sig over at your wp talk page. - Icewedge (*bleet*) 05:05, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm hurt, Icewedge, I really am. Shouldn't vague internet acquaintances be nicer to each other?  : )   05:12, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Heh, heh. I'll be sending my adoptees to bully you next. - Icewedge (*bleet*) 05:20, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
 * "Adoptees"? You have children—at your age?  Shameshameshameshame!  : )   05:24, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
 * We do things differently in Alaska. (actually see wp:Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User). - Icewedge (*bleet*) 12:47, 12 July 2008 (EDT)

Welcome!
I haven't seen you around here before! Are you lost? 11:01, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
 * What Satanic scheme have you come up with now?  11:04, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You're being a bit forward for a newbie. Get back in line :P 11:06, 12 July 2008 (EDT)

Userbox templates
Are there any userboxes on this website?--Bobby 18:16, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed there are. Here you go.   18:51, 12 July 2008 (EDT)

Ahem
Going through all this made me wonder. What's the max (besides infinite) that a ban can be? -- *Gen. S.T. Shrink*  Get to the bunker  04:30, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, Icewedge already tested character limits for usernames, so I say it's about time we tested character limits in block times. Who's up first?   05:03, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Hm. As you can see, it goes to at least... uh, I'm not really willing to count the digits.  It's your block; why don't you?  After all, what else are you going to do while your blocked for all that time?  : )   05:11, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, thats' strange. I tried for 150 years and it didn't work. -- *Gen. S.T. Shrink*  Get to the bunker  16:35, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * It helps if you remember to type the word "years" after it : )   17:47, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I did. -- *Gen. S.T. Shrink*  Get to the bunker  18:03, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I wouldn't know then. Maybe the wiki just hates you.  Which it clearly must, because you just got logged out now  : )   17:59, 14 July 2008 (EDT)

Your signature
I wish you to change your signature so that it does not read "Watch and learn", as I have had bad experiences with learning. Something inoffensive like "Stalk" might be nice. 16:44, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Have you been stalking me on Wikipedia?  17:34, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * If you look about three inches up on this page, you'll notice that Icewedge mentioned it here as well. I thought it was funneh. 17:44, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh closer inspection, I see that he mentioned something slightly different that lead me to the Stalk/watch thing. I must admit, that looks slightly "stalky" with that added detail. Eeep. 17:48, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I didn't find it funny at all. If I had the clout, I would have opposed it and said, "No.  Screw their hypersensitivity."  But, alas, I am but a minor editor of no consequence.  They would have burned me at the stake.   17:50, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Down in the darker corners of the Net, we have words for such behaviour. I shan't repeat them here, but they're quite colourful. -- 17:53, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * For my behavior or theirs?  17:55, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Both. [[Image:Nods.gif]]


 * In this case, however, I was thinking of theirs. -- 17:56, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * RA, please stop vandalising talk pages, as you did here, or you will be banned from editing Wikipedia.  17:57, 14 July 2008 (EDT)

This is your second warning
Please stop deleting people's comments, as you did here. If you continue, I will just keep making pointless Wikipedia injokes. 18:01, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh God, no. Not that. -- 18:05, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Okay, I figured out what I was doing. I kept getting edit conflicts, and instead of backing up to the talk page proper and then pressing the "edit" button again, I just refreshed the browser while still at the "Editing page" thing.  It made the edit conflict warning go away, so I thought it had worked, but instead I just undid any changes made since I started editing.   18:06, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Why don't you just copy the text from the second edit console? I had to do that thrice to reinsert that comment of mine that you deleted. 18:13, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * That's what I normally do. But I was getting lazy.   18:26, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Well cease being lazy. --[[Image:150px-Galactic Republic svg.png|18px]] Darth Harrington   No, I am your salesperson  18:27, 14 July 2008 (EDT)

yrros m'I
.soahc fo efil a nesohc ev'I tub uoy evol I ...gnitseretnI ...etouq a ekil fo tros sdnuos tahT

Somewhat overdue
242 edits ago, you welcomeed me to this wiki, stating a respect for those who choose to reconcile religion and science, with a fair warning to beware of the less tolerant atheists here. It is with great pride, however, that I honestly say that I have yet to meet an editor who fits the description you warned me of. While I did run into a small bump, the debate in question had nothing to do with religion or science. Less tolerant atheists? What less tolerant atheists?
 * Heh! me 23:46, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Yup ;-)

Grr
How are you editing? You got a yob yet? -- 13:20, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Nope! 18:27, 4 August 2008 (EDT)

Hi!
So hau has life bean treating you? 20:15, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Tolerably.  20:17, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Hmmm. You're not giving me much to discuss. Have you accepted the common jellyfish as your personal saviour yet? 20:23, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
 * I guess I'll give you more then. I have a job now (sort of—it's unpaid).  And, no—I am my own savior!   20:37, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Good for you! However, I must warn you: only those who accept jellyfish into their hearts will go to Sea World when they die. 20:41, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Bleh. I dislike Sea World anyways.  Disney Land is more entertaining.   20:53, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't know anything about either of them, not having made my home in Ameriville. 20:55, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
 * ...That means I'll never get to meet you : (   20:57, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Not really. I'm sure neither of us plan to stay exactly where we are for the rest of our lives. That would be silly :nods: 21:00, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Is an unpaid job really a "job" at all? -- 18:08, 20 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes. It's called being an "intern".   23:14, 20 August 2008 (EDT)