User talk:Stabby the Misanthrope/Archive6

Did you know?
That you and I are in a death match for fourth place on total RW contributions? 20:30, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
 * That so? Alas, for I can no longer maintain the edit rate I used to.   23:03, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
 * 6028 vs. 5888? Looks like there's a comfortable buffer between us  : )   23:11, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Where am I? Where am I?? 23:24, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
 * You have... 3,551 edits. In only three months.  Jesus Fucking Christ, Chaos... that's 1,180 edits a month.   23:45, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
 * That's vaguely saddening :( 23:49, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Cheer up, Chaos. You still pale in comparison to Human's amazing 2200 edits a month!   23:53, 17 August 2008 (EDT)

Stop working so hard
Makes lazy jellyfish look bad. 23:36, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
 * But I'm must make up for lost time! And very soon, RA will be kicked off the computer, so I must be productive with what little time I have  : (   23:41, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, all right. [[image:th_hug.gif]] 23:45, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
 * If I must, right? : )   23:46, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
 * It's a catchy (if slightly defeatist) phrase. 23:47, 17 August 2008 (EDT)

Epic phail
Your reworking of the essay template is a disaster on so many levels. First, you altered the arguments on a template we have been using for a long time. Second, you didn't consider the possibilities of how it is used and allow for them. Third, you implemented it and made a mess for no good reason. Please use the talk pages to discuss radical alterations of heavily used templates before changing them. I now request you to undo the changes you made (all of them!) and discuss them with "the rest of us" if you think they make so much sense.  ħ uman  03:44, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

Listless one?
Sorry just a little confused here --BoredCPer 00:07, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, your name does say you're bored, so I was just being playful : )   00:34, 22 August 2008 (EDT)

Thanks!
Thanks for the warm heart and the wide arms! --LArron 17:04, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
 * You're welcome, LArron!  00:56, 31 August 2008 (EDT)

Hello there!
Also...


 * No, I do agree. A picture of The Thinker is much more relevant than the Wise and Mighty Cheesus.   00:38, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Aw. Thanks you.
 * I was going to make one that said "This user thinks RA did not royally fuck up the essay template" (adapted to fit your phrasing), but I have nowhere to put it, dammit. 00:40, 31 August 2008 (EDT)

Bunchanumbers
Set me in my place if I'm being presumptuous, but why do you greet every random IP that edits here? --CSimpacted with knowledge 04:09, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It is part of my devious effort to spam my name as much as possible across the wiki, and preserve my spot in the top ten most linked pages. For a while, Bob M and I were even competing over our spot (he used to be lower-ranked than me).   04:13, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 * But... I could beat you just by making a huge page full of my signature. 04:25, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, for the about two minutes or so that it would remain in existence. -- 04:40, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 * If it lasted that long...--CSimpacted with knowledge 04:43, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Creating a page full of your signature would count for 1 page link, Jellyfish. It counts the number of pages that link to another page, not the number of links per page.  It that were the case, all bazillion of Human's signed comments would count, and goat would be somewhere around #30.   04:56, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Hmmph. Well in that case, I can't summon up much enthusiasm for this competition. 05:18, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

How did you do the word change thingy?!
Thank you sir/madam or indeterminate species for the greetings...now if I can only figure out how to work this thing I'd be a happy aarvark. Mick McT 07:18, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Easy! It's a template—just type  in a sentence and it'll randomly pick a noun off the list.   15:37, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

Death race
Told you. 14:07, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You are a terrible person, you know that? Even I never rubbed my total edit count in anyone's faces.   14:09, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It says it in your signature. With an exclaimation mark. 14:12, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, but I never went up to anyone and said, "You know what? My edit count is about to surpass yours.  Neener neener neener!"   14:20, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I suppose you have forgotten this email conversation?
 * Let the record show that I am smug. 14:32, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I must admit I'm not entirely convinced by this alleged primary source. -- 14:34, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Your Historian Senses are malfunctioning. 14:40, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Absurd. My Historian's senses are working at peak efficiency, a finely tuned instrument for protecting the innocent public against all sorts of deceptions and shenanigans. -- 14:46, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Perhaps... you are TK! Editor at CPLiar at RP! 14:48, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * LOL! What a sad little person you are to make such a sad little accusation, Ed. All the lurkers agree with me in pmail that I'm not TK. -- 14:52, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, how much do I miss TK! Editor at CPLiar at RP! 14:56, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I haven't made up my mind yet: which one is a sock of TK, RA or Jellyfish? Editor at CPLiar at RP! 14:36, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Aagh, you pulled a TK!  14:37, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I didn't start using the phrase "neener neener neener" until just the other day. Also, I don't use the smiley " :-p ".  So my point still stands.  Neener neener neener!   14:37, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm sure you have done at some point. I thought that was a pretty flawless imitation of you, actually. 14:40, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It is. Although I generally don't use a hyphen in my smiley faces, you got my personality spot on.  Am I that predictable, or are you just good?   14:43, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Thanks! I'm just good :) Anyway, I can mimic you because I feel an affinity towards you  16:56, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed, comrade, I feel the same way. Let us go forth and conquer, together!   21:34, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * But what shall we conquer? The Farm belongs to Mr Jones and we could not run it on our own :o 21:39, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * We shall conquer the wiki! Join me, and together we can destroy the Emperor, and rule the wiki as father and son sysop plus one!   22:58, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Or, you could attempt to start a new world order by cleansing society of evil, and simultaneously pretend to help me track you down and bring you to justice.
 * How could that go wrong? 23:07, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * ... I have no response to that.  23:10, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Good. My L shrine needs dusting. 23:13, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Aagh, you pulled a TK!  14:37, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I didn't start using the phrase "neener neener neener" until just the other day. Also, I don't use the smiley " :-p ".  So my point still stands.  Neener neener neener!   14:37, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm sure you have done at some point. I thought that was a pretty flawless imitation of you, actually. 14:40, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It is. Although I generally don't use a hyphen in my smiley faces, you got my personality spot on.  Am I that predictable, or are you just good?   14:43, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Thanks! I'm just good :) Anyway, I can mimic you because I feel an affinity towards you  16:56, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed, comrade, I feel the same way. Let us go forth and conquer, together!   21:34, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * But what shall we conquer? The Farm belongs to Mr Jones and we could not run it on our own :o 21:39, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * We shall conquer the wiki! Join me, and together we can destroy the Emperor, and rule the wiki as father and son sysop plus one!   22:58, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Or, you could attempt to start a new world order by cleansing society of evil, and simultaneously pretend to help me track you down and bring you to justice.
 * How could that go wrong? 23:07, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * ... I have no response to that.  23:10, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Good. My L shrine needs dusting. 23:13, 3 September 2008 (EDT)

Hmmph
You always stop talking first. It's a bad habit. And very impolite. I demands reparations. 23:42, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'd sysop you, but I'm not a bureaucrat. Beyond that, I can't think of anything.   23:44, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I can, uh, dedicate my next essay to you.  23:44, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You write essays? 23:45, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed.  23:54, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh yeah. I didn't know about half of those. What the hell happened while you were writing Atheist Logic? Hurricane? Emergence of Shub-Niggurath? 23:58, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I had it! It was brilliant—a stroke of genius!  Then I lost it.   00:00, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
 * That's what happened. I hope to someday continue it.   00:00, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Perhaps L could help you.
 * Oh no, wait, he can't, because he's dead. 00:03, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Who is this mysterious 'L' character, why is he deceased, and why do you have a shrine to him? -- 07:06, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 * ♥ L is like God, but cuter. He's dead because some irritating Nietzsche wannabe killed him. And... er.. the shrine is just a social thing... ♥ 01:09, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Anime reference, AK.  22:28, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm sensing a certain reluctance on your part to acknowledge the gloriousness of L. 22:45, 5 September 2008 (EDT)

PS :)
Did you know that Stephen Colbert used the word "afikomen" last night??? (He said "ask your Jewish friends", but I already knew what he meant! - Smart via RW?)  ħ uman  02:03, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Did you get shut down for the night, just as I do by Aschlafly (the ultimate parthian shot!)? Anyway, please, feel free to present your ideas to the mob in the morrow.  Use the intercom, if you think it will reach people.  ħ uman  02:18, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yah, it's freaky how these things turn out, isn't it? : )   22:30, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, unfortunately, I do get shut down at night. : (   22:30, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Is that why you haven't joined my epic debate yet? 22:46, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You mean the actual Epic Debate, or a new one I haven't heard of yet?  22:49, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 * The one on Eira's talk page. It is nearly as long as that one, I think, and shows no signs of slowing down. 22:51, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yah, that one is epic. Epic phail ;)  ħ uman  23:53, 5 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Meanie. 23:54, 5 September 2008 (EDT)

That's not a legitimate minestrone
Seriously. 00:11, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * If you're referring to my supper, I make soup whenever I feel like it, minestrone or no minestrone.  00:14, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Twelve?  ħ uman  00:16, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * "I make soup whenever I feel like it, minestrone or no minestrone" -- But no minestrone in particular. 00:18, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Good Lord. I completely missed that tyco.   00:25, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Tyco made the best slop cars.  ħ uman  00:43, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Not real typos, RA. But stilt hilarious. 01:11, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Eh, what coracles? Sounds like an baby-person thing.   01:12, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Prombasbibly more of a clacker thing.  ħ uman  01:29, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Are you trying to traduce me to the bright side?  01:30, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You have now reached the point where I genuinely can't understand you. 01:37, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Pleade allow me to attroduce meself, I am a man of salt and pepper.  ħ uman  01:45, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I see you've met my partner—that mam of thyme and season, Mr. Anthropomorph!  01:49, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Was it really worth digging out that sock to say that, RA? 01:53, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Who was that masked man, anyway?  01:56, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It was L. Undoubtedly. 01:58, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Incidentally, do you remember that picture you edited to make your blasphemy template? I've seen the original, and your version is awful. Why did you use Paint, for God's sake?? 01:58, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Because it was all I had at the time. And how is it "awful"?   02:00, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It looks like you smeared it with jam. No offence meant -- I would do worse if I had to use such tools -- but I think you should replace it. PSP! Colorise! The future beckons! 02:01, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Maybe it was "awefull"?  ħ uman  02:03, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * What kind of jam?  02:08, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Red. 02:10, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Strop Aubrey Fields for Eva.  ħ uman  02:11, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It only contains coloring? I was hoping for fruit.   02:13, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Good night, then. 02:16, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I guess you missed my comment then. JAM!  ħ uman  02:30, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

So,
Like my new sig? 23:57, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Eek, a mowse?  ħ uman  23:59, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Pinto doesn't even have a mowse. And he can't have one because red is reserved for Radioactive Man :P 11:09, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, dear... You weren't hoping for me to say something nice, were you?  00:01, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Oddly enough, that looks less like a redlink to me. I must have malfunctioning eyes. 11:07, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Maybe you're color blind?  11:10, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Nope. 11:11, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Maybe you are! 11:12, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Are you pretending to be, then?  11:19, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * W h <font color="#DC143C">a <font color="#CD853F">t <font color="#ADFF2F">e <font color="#FFFF00">v <font color="#D2691E">e <font color="#228B22">r <font color="#A9A9A9">m <font color="#483D8B">a <font color="#00BFFF">k <font color="#7B68EE">e <font color="#BDB76B">s <font color="#FF4500">y <font color="#8FBC8F">o <font color="#556B2F">u <font color="#FF1493">s <font color="#DEB887">a <font color="#CD5C5C">y <font color="#9ACD32">t <font color="#FF7F50">h <font color="#FFE4E1">a <font color="#9370DB">t <font color="#DB7093">? 11:30, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Ooh, pretty! Moer color, please!   11:43, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * No! Do you realise how long it took me to construct that??
 * Anyway, on a more important matter, do you liek my mowse? You should also have a mowse. A red one. 11:49, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Er, no thanks.  11:57, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You're not allowed to say no. Them's the rules.
 * And I'm sorry to hear about your penis :( Do you want to talk about it? 12:15, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes. You see, my penis isn't large enough.  I just can't be happy with it.   12:23, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * There are (supposedly) email people you can talk to about that. Are we talking about girth or length here?
 * Actually, please do not answer that. 12:34, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You didn't check the link, did you?  12:37, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Did! And the metaphor is apparent in your signature as well, but it isn't as amusing as a literal interpretation... 12:46, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You must enjoy being difficult, then.  13:47, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * ...ebyaM

Radman's Remix

 * <font color="#1E90FF">W <font color="#FF00FF">h <font color="#DC143C">a <font color="#CD853F">t <font color="#ADFF2F">e <font color="#FFFF00">v <font color="#D2691E">e <font color="#228B22">r <font color="#A9A9A9">m <font color="#483D8B">a <font color="#00BFFF">k <font color="#7B68EE">e <font color="#BDB76B">s <font color="#FF4500">y <font color="#8FBC8F">o <font color="#556B2F">u <font color="#FF1493">s <font color="#DEB887">a <font color="#CD5C5C">y <font color="#9ACD32">t <font color="#FF7F50">h <font color="#FFE4E1">a <font color="#9370DB">t <font color="#DB7093">? 11:30, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh my God. That's horrible. And RA's new signature is horrible, too. Obviously, you're both colourblind and devoid of any sense of aesthetics. -- 20:13, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't see what the problem is. I only seek to tell the truth with my signature  ; )   21:26, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

!
Of course I will, you silly fruitcake! I would've done you at the same time as AK (that was a long time ago...), but I was worried about seeming too unilateral -- especially since Human declined when I asked him back in May. Anyway, welcome to the inner sanctum! We have carrot cake! 06:11, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Now pledge your allegiance to L. 06:18, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Who is L and why does he deserve our allegiance? -- 06:38, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I already, actually :P
 * Or, you can go if you want helpful information for some reason. Please ignore the pictures from the manga version, as they are painfully uncute.  06:57, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Thank you for the helpful information, although I must admit I find it difficult to consider this relevant to my interests. -- 07:15, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Well you did ask.
 * In other news, I made you a :P  Please spend it wisely.  07:25, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Thank you, I will. In yet other news, I believe it is your move in the Big Epixxorz Song Contest. -- 07:29, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Thank you, Chaos!  12:33, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I hear no pledging. *folds arms* 12:56, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * All I will pledge is that you were not in any way my rebound friend after Human rejected me. : )   13:02, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yeah, Human's mean. I heard him call you a "hockey mask fraud" once, even though I begged him not to.
 * Anyway, Human only rejected you yesterday. We've known each other for ages. 13:07, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed. Your premise is historically unsound. -- 13:07, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Thank you, AK! 13:07, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Don't mention it, small child! *flies into the sunset* -- 13:07, 12 September 2008 (EDT)


 * Come on! I had your mannerisms down perfectly (until I lapsed into some kind of superhero dream). That surely warrants some form of praise? 13:18, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Hm. I don't know if I'd use the word "unsound". I'd probably use "flawed" instead. -- 13:51, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * "Your premise is historically flawed" has an unsatisfying metre.
 * Unsatisfying? That's a perfectly good iambic pentameter right there: "Your premise is historically flawed". -- 14:22, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Stop waving your silly iambs in my face. To end the sentence with an anapaest is by far the wiser choice. 14:36, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I suppose that depends on the effect you wish to achieve. While I'll admit there is a certain appeal in breaking up the pentameter as a humorous comment on the flawed, or unsound, historical premise itself, I'd really prefer contrasting it to the unmodified, "perfect" pentameter. -- 14:44, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You appear to be assuming that perfecion is a technical quality. Does this apply to visual art as well? Can I draw a square and call it "the best picture"? 14:51, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * No, I didn't mean that the pentameter is perfect in the sense of "best", but rather that an unmodified pentameter is a perfect pentameter, considered as a pentameter. Just like a picture of an absolutely regular square would also be one of a "perfect" square. -- 14:57, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * But I only said I prefered my version because it sounded better -- if you defend your version based only on the idea that it's more "perfect", you clearly are claiming that it must sound better if it is technically superior. 15:05, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * No, you advanced your version on the grounds that it was more "satifying" and "the wiser choice". Surely, these too are technical evaluations. Further, I am not using the word "perfect" in any sense of "best", but rather "corresponding to an ideal standard" (1 c) -- 15:25, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I may have phrased it in the manner of a technical evaluation, but you and I both know that what I really meant was "I like it better". This is often always the case with such phrasing -- indeed, our own songwar is a lengthy exploration of this concept. And I recognise that you meant perfect in a technical sense, what I'm saying is that your statements clearly show that you think that something technically perfect must be superior to something technically imperfect. Despite your shameless literal denial! 15:37, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * That is so not fair, Chaos. You're both smarter and quicker with a witty refutation than I am.  I expected that from AKjeldsen, but from you?  I feel inadequate now...   15:44, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * What, specifically are--
 * Hold on, I forgot something.
 * *preens*
 * There we go. What, specifically, are you referring to, O Foodstuff of Unstable Atomic Constitution? 15:50, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Now, what sort of meter is that supposed to be in? -- 16:55, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * It's free verse. 16:59, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh. Well, that's okay, I guess. -- 17:02, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Seriously, RA; what were you talking about? 04:22, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes; if not outright inquiring, then at least slightly curious minds want to know. -- 16:55, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

Floor buffer
I'll give it a go. ;) --Robledo 16:25, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Good, good...  18:45, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

Vandal? Me?
You're wrong.Bdbdbd 19:57, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I apologize, Bd. You're name just screamed "Vandal!" at first blush.  I hope you'll forgive me for being so quick to accuse.   20:04, 13 September 2008 (EDT)

Hey
Inquiring minds, etc etc. Do you not read your talk page? Tsk tsk tsk. 05:19, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I was referring to this comment of yours. I would need much more than seven minutes to come up with anything that snappy.   05:26, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Aw. Fang queue. I did like the triangle part ^_^ 05:34, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Funnily enough, it usually takes me ages to write my comments, even the small ones. 05:36, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Chaos might be some sort of arts major. Such phrases come naturally to them. -- 05:35, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Ur just jealous :P 05:36, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Somewhat. -- 05:41, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Bah. You get to be admired for your articulacy all the time. Let someone else have a go. 05:46, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * That's fair. You also have the advantage in that you copyedit your stuff. -- 06:23, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Are you claiming you don't copyedit your comments? That everything you type comes into existence all perfectly spelled and flawlessly arranged like some kind of sentient crystalline growth? I call bluff! 06:29, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * No, quite the contrary. I don't copyedit my comments, which is why they come into existence with, on average, 1.326 errors in spelling, grammar or use of vocabulary. -- 06:35, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I really hate it when my comments come into existence with use of vocabulary :P
 * Anyway, I think you exaggerate. I bet you at least look your comments over before you post. It would be hard not to. 06:39, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Sometimes. Unless I'm too lazy. Or forget. Or just don't give a damn because I'm a linguistic rebel. -- 06:50, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Best copyedit ever. 08:54, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I did that on purpose to illustrate my point. -- 09:11, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Hmmph. 09:42, 14 September 2008 (EDT)

People
Personally, I don't think people already catted in subcats of people also need to be in people. But that's just me. ThunderkatzHo! 19:34, 14 September 2008 (EDT) P.S.  I feel like I've had this conversation before with someone else. Anyone remember? ThunderkatzHo! 19:34, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Personally, I disagree.  20:02, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * We've had it at talk category people. RA is the only one who agrees with himself. We should have category:articles, too. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms"> ħ uman  20:05, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't see why not. I'll be the first to own up to the implications of my logic.  I won't even get in your way (unlike you with me).   20:08, 14 September 2008 (EDT)

Auld Nick's not dead!
$$&#914;&cup;&#182;1&isin;R$$ I'm not dead I've just been busy with something else. Auld Nick 12:05, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

I shouldn't bother if I were you.
01:13, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Why not? I enjoy it.  That aside, my real purpose is to deny them notoriety by destroying the narrative they built using account names.  Hence, the random names.   01:16, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Mmmm. That'll show him. 01:18, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I do not appreciate your sarcasm, Chaos. Can't a guy have a good time without being criticized?   01:19, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I wasn't being sarcastic. I was being unenthusiastically supportive. And the answer to your question is: no! 01:23, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm tired. Are you tired? I am. 01:29, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes. But only because I just renamed .   01:33, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * But you're not too tired to fiddle around with Fakeil! Such dedication! (Those equals signs are evil) 01:36, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Thank, you—I try, I really do. Anything to gratuitously flaunt a worthy template.  And yes, they are.   01:38, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

Fine!
Let's talk about something you like. 01:55, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * No no no. I'm perfectly happy just derailing all of your conversations.   02:00, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm afraid the only animes I'm fluent in are Gundam Wing and Neon Genesis Evangelion.  02:00, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Derailing bastard.
 * I like NGE. No idea what Gundam is. Or do I...? Isn't that the one that got stretched out into dozens of different series? 02:04, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Good for you. You have avoided seeing one of the most drawn-out franchises in television history.  FYI, Gundam Wing was the worst incarnation of the series ever made, yet, bizarrely, the most popular to ever play in the U.S.  I still watch it because it was the first anime to captivate me, and despite its unparalleled lameness, it still holds a special place in my heart.   02:11, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * NGE? Good, good.  Have any good NGE quips, like you did for DeathNote?   02:11, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't normally do requests, you know
 * Ummm... It doesn't really lend itself to quips, does it? I once (on a forum far far away) made a very poor joke wherein I likened my many previous account names (Yes, it's a long-established habit) to Rei's various deceased forms.
 * It wasn't very good, and I can't even remember how it went.
 * This is exactly why I don't do requests *sulks* 02:23, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * That's okay. I forgive you for your limited brain capacity.  : )   02:25, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Alright: you come up with an NGE-themed quip. Go on, right now. Instantly. 02:26, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm afraid I am busily devoting my awesome mindpowerz to the clickbotting of another CP article, and do not have the processing power necessary for this task. Hence my outsourcing it to you.   02:28, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I thought you weren't interested in CP? 02:32, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * For me, it's more about playing with other RationalWikians than it is about Conservapedia.  02:34, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You mean... you're fighting CP so that RW will be proud of you? Very interesting...
 * Ramen without pork, please. 02:37, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm fighting CP to hear my father's praise. : )   02:40, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Hey! That's the exact same quip I just made! Don't make me come over there! 02:44, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * And where's my ramen, dammit? Get a move on, or I'll be forced to regrow my arm at you. 02:52, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

Ramen
Please have it ready by lunchtime. 03:11, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm going to bed now, dear.  03:21, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You stole my word. Give it back.
 * Oh, all right. Good night. 03:33, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

You've had ages
Want my lunch now. 20:52, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * You realize you sound more like Naruto than Evangelion, right?  20:54, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * I can't very well mimic Ayanami Rei and demand your attention simultaneously, can I? It wouldn't make any sense. One of these objectives must be compromised!
 * And I've no idea what this "Naruto" thing is. Don't explain, though. It can't be very important. 21:00, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Lunch? Don't be silly, it's the middle of the night. Tsch. -- 20:55, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Isn't. 21:00, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Is where I am, and that's what matters. -- 21:04, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Not when I'm planning my food-consumption, it doesn't. 21:07, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

Oi!
I have sent you a very important atrolabe cutlass  parabolic lens message. Yeah, that's it. 10:40, 17 September 2008 (EDT)

Wai?
Yu no liek jellyfish? * makes sad face* 16:10, 17 September 2008 (EDT)

Too damn lazy
I didn't even know it was possible for someone else to edit my user page, that's discouraging. Jimaginator 09:52, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
 * OK, now I get it, the "lazy" insert is to get people to add to their user page, and remove the red ink. Nuff said. Jimaginator 10:01, 18 September 2008 (EDT)