User talk:I'm not Jesus/Archive 1

Can I call you Brian? EddyP 09:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I believe he is Brian, and the same can be said of his wife. Welcome, I'm not Jesus. May all your errors go undiscovered.--Concernedresident 09:14, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Whose Brian? I&#39;m not Jesus 11:14, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Guys, GUYS! You forgot to give Jesus Brian a welcoming banner.


 * That's better. Welcome, Brian! 21:53, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Aw, and here I was hoping for an Apocalyptica reference... ;) --Sid (talk) 13:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

I didn't know about the video when I chose that username. I&#39;m not Jesus (talk) 19:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Your username reminds me of my teen years
Back when I was a rambunctious 15 year old punk rocker, my friends and I would go to the Mall of America and find a pay phone and dial the operator. When they'd answer, we'd go "I'm looking for a phone number for someone. Last name: Christ, first name: Jesus." And when they'd come back and say "We can't find that name" we'd say "You mean you haven't found Jesus?" and hang up. 16:05, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Nobody has really found Jesus because he doesn't exist.I&#39;m not Jesus (talk) 16:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * True, but one practical joke begets another in this case. 16:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Punishment
I see that you have been extremely busy inserting liberal bias doing all sorts of useful stuff lately, so as punishment I've demoted you to sysop. Here's your instruction manual. -- Nx  / talk 19:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

AAAAAhhhhh I&#39;m not Jesus (talk) 19:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Second time around.  19:56, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * What do you mean, Waesel??? I&#39;m not Jesus (talk) 06:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Means I made you a sysop again, but you seem to have undone it. Whatever suits you, I guess.   16:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Why did I stop being a sysop? I undid it because I was testing out the User right management button, I assumed if I am a bureaucrat I can make myself a sysop again but it seems I can't. I&#39;m not Jesus (talk) 16:34, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You're not a bureaucrat; nobody is. We all lost all of our rights for a while, then some of us got some of them back.  It's been a long strange trip.  I'll give your sysop back now, but don't put it down again so quickly.   16:37, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Lay off the TK jokes.
All the more considering you weren't even here when he was. Thanks. P-Foster (talk) 17:55, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Only the true Messiah ...
... would deny that he is the Messiah! --Let Them Eat Cake (talk) 14:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Well I deny that I am the Messiah. I&#39;m not Jesus (talk) 10:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * He is the Messiah! --Let Them Eat Cake (talk) 14:31, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Jesus sex
I reordered a lot of what was in that sex-tion. But i hope i didn't change the overall tone and approach, it just didn't read very smoothly to my ears. do check it over, since you've been making lots of the changes to that section. --En attendant Godot 16:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I think it's really funny now and worthy of a bronze article. I&#39;m not Jesus (talk) 17:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It's got a lot of work, especially in the language. but it will be excellent as you all have some great ideas there.--[[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]En attendant Godot  17:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Proxima?
Is that you? 09:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm light years away from Proxima. Incidentally Proxima doesn't seem to like you, Why? I&#39;m not Jesus (talk) 08:13, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Human has spent hours rewriting some of Proxy's edits and criticised her writing style; so there is a degree of antagonism. 08:23, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the friendly block but I feel you may overestimate me on various levels. --BobSpring is sprung! 19:46, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

JIDF
Hi there. Thanks for keeping an eye out on the page about our organization. We have some concerns we have raised on the talk page, here: [] - if you could have a look and help us address them, it would be appreciated! Thanks! --JIDF (talk) 08:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

If you're going to be making miserably incomplete articles full of red links
Please try polishing them up in your userspace first. I mean, shit, yeah, it's a wiki, but it should at least look presentable, right? Put it in your userspace and work on it until it reaches some standard of quality (any standard of quality), then let the mob ravage it. I mean, you've got one that says "source" in a redlink in guise of references. Somebody searches for this subject on google, they come across us, they'll think we're jokes (yeah, that matters. this is a wiki, not a circle jerk.  we're writing for other people)--  19:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

We've been wasting time duplicating material that's already in EvoWiki and I'm working to stop that. We need to reach an agreement how many EvoWiki articles we can deal with each day, each week. I&#39;m not Jesus (talk) 20:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You are of course right, Jesus. We haven't done a great job of integrating the evowiki material. It's critically important stuff in places. I started a forum on it at some point this sumner but got caught up with other things. Just ignore Brx. He's a disgusting talentless creep who compensates for his inability to create anything of value by plaguing those who do.  14:39, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I put up a post in the bar about working on the EVoWiki stuff about a month or so ago and got absolutely no response, so I'm glad you've kick-started it. RC patrollers will often jump in and help out when a crap article shows up but let them get up to a reasonable standard before moving on to the next lot. 14:55, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Woah, woah...
These articles that you're creating look like they have potential, but the titles are absolute shit. We're not an encyclopedia, but articles with titles that are just randomly-strung-together sentences are a problem. Also, we probably have a lot of this material in proper articles already. Slow down and come up with a plan we can all work together on. B♭maj7 (talk) Anachronistically anachronistic 20:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

I'll stop for now, the titles were already in EvoWiki. I&#39;m not Jesus (talk) 20:07, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


 * We're supposed to be porting EvoWiki content right now, but I think we need to prioritise the ones that would make standalone articles here in the RW style, rather than EW style. Scarlet A.pngd hominem 20:10, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Before you do too much more work on these, can you chime in on the discussion here? We're sounding out opinions but it's looking likely these articles make be deleted & the EvoWiki content used more selectively as a resource rather than imported wholesale into RW mainspace.  18:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

"Atheist clergy"
Are you intending to write something on this topic? Cause if you are you should probably rethink the term. "Atheist clergy" would be clergy who serve atheists, For example in US states where you still need a minister to perform your wedding. The concept you are getting at is "acting clergy who turn atheist" or something. I don't know if you had any intents this way or not, so I'll shut up now. :-) Godot   I live in the Infinite monkey cage 17:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)