Talk:Post-truth

Better to expound than redirect
, : Wikipedia has a very detailed page on I think it would be better to expound upon the idea rather than simply redirect it to either fake news or emotional appeal. Bongolian (talk) 07:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll try, but it'll probably be one of my infamous stubs. —вιgℓʝвιgℓ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ/sᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:11, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * OK it's a reasonable start. Thanks! Bongolian (talk) 20:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Added some content with sources. How is it? 01:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

The real post-truth
Is here. Anna Livia (talk) 15:26, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * https://youtu.be/DJl5eTtQ5aQ —вιgℓʝвιgℓ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ/sᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Huh?
Is this article really a stub?--Alola, my name is Delibirda! (Chattering place) 09:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * No, you’re right it isn’t (anymore). Though you could perhaps argue for adding the expand template(?) ScepticWombat (talk) 15:17, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The article does not miss the important stuff, but could need some expansion.--Alola, my name is Delibirda! (Chattering place) 10:51, 21 January 2020 (UTC)