Talk:RU-486

Comment
Got a feeling we don't need a separate article on this. ADK ...I'll envision your glycerin! 00:02, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, we do. It's significant enough historically and politically, since there is still a constant war against it.  This pill is freedom for women in places where abortion is illegal, even though they are getting the drug illegally.  If you don't like it after I write it, feel free to dump it.  but let me write it first?  Besides, we have an article on "Doctrine of Signature" which is really relevant! :-)--[[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]En attendant Godot  00:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * (EC)This was all the rage in Australia a few years back. -  π    silverbrain.png 00:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Makes more sense now you've expanded it. ADK ...I'll receive your contradiction! 07:26, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You'll probably see that a few days, with one or two other articles. sometimes it takes a bit to get my head around what it says, should say, etc.  That and, you know, i have a job.  I don't do anything, but i *have* a job.  ;-)  For what it's worth, my plan is to expand comstock's page, looking at his law and the effect, and maybe think about some other anti women laws that have nothing to do with abortion, but have to do with access to liberty and freedom.  we don't have a lot of feminist type anti conservative here.  [[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]En attendant Godot  14:16, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Well
This little pill is catching a lot of flak again lately, isn't it? Chillpilled (talk) 04:43, 29 April 2023 (UTC)