User talk:Wisconcom

Draft:Lemmygrad
If you ever try to move it into mainspace, it'll inevitably be deleted. I wouldn't waste your time working on it. Christopher (talk) 22:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * This website has thousands of users, is a major instance for pro-China ideology on the internet, and such. This deserves to be documented as much as RevLeft. For what reason do you think this will "inevitably" be deleted? Wisconcom (talk) 22:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * "Thousands of users" is nothing, and the site barely has that. It's very hard to buy the argument that the article has nothing to do with your own history with the site. Christopher (talk) 22:52, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

What history with this website? I created an account on that site which I have never used a single time, is that my "history"? Once again, having around ten-thousand active users, and many thousands more unregistered observers, serving as a major center for online Dengist organzing (ProleWiki and other free and open-source website were founded by users of this website), is rather meaningful. If we are to cover pro-China apologia, this website would be a major place where such ideas are found. Otherwise, if this is going to be deleted, we should do the same with RevLeft. Wisconcom (talk) 23:14, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * This draft at best seems like it'd be a minor section on the Reddit page on failed offshoots of Reddit. Seems like it belongs in the same group as the various .win sites when the main set of mentioned communities are basically just variations of tankie infested subreddits. -- Techpriest (talk) 22:55, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I don’t particularly see how this is off mission. It’s not as if reddit communities never had a mention on this wiki before. It’s missional to our stated purpose of exploring authoritarianism. There are definitely a few creationist or youtuber articles with comparably small audiences on this site. - Only Sort of Dumb (talk) 06:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Premature archiving
You (or someone) seem to have archived your previous talkpage content rather rapidly. Your talk page was certainly not not overlong at that moment.

While we do not have any explicit instructions about this, it is established convention that users wait several months before archiving precious conversations on their talkpages. You might want to consider replacing the previous content as I am sure others would want others to see it easily.Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 17:46, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * And looking at "archive one" from your talkpage I see you have already been advised: "Archiving isn't to be used to hide comments you don't like from your talkpage". So you can't maintain that you didn't know about this convention.Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 20:18, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

All things in moderation
A case involving you has been raised at All things in moderation. Feel free to comment.

GeeJayKWhere all evil dwells Where every lie is true 16:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

AfD
I've nominated Lemmygrad for deletion. Christopher (talk) 11:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Why do you keep blocking yourself?
Why do you keep blocking (and unblocking) yourself? I think you are angry that your article about lemmygrad got deleted and that you have a case about you on ATIM. --Edward the eight (talk) 19:10, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Your signature
Please have it actually link to your userpage or at least contain your full username, thanks Plutocow (talk) 22:19, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * And please stop removing your old comments without any reason, it directly goes against RW's talk page policy Plutocow (talk) 22:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Chicken Coop
Edward the eight (talk) 01:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Can you not make your wiki require an essay to join
All it does is dissuade people from joining. What if someone isn't a Stalinist and just wants to improve an article 2600:4040:403C:F300:9254:9EBC:7A0A:9106 (talk) 22:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Are you referring to ProleWiki? ProleWiki is not Stalinist (even if they claim to uphold Stalin), they are Dengists, which are two separate and contradictory ideologies. Wisconcom 22:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yea, prolewiki. I don't know what Dengism means, but that wiki is going nowhere if you all require an essay to even edit it once.  2600:4040:403C:F300:9254:9EBC:7A0A:9106 (talk) 22:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I am unable to correct this directly, considering I am not in cordial relations with the ProleWiki administration, but I may be able to share your complants with them. I may be able to help you get into ProleWiki, if you are interested. However, considers itself an exclusively Socialist project. What is your ideological stance, if you are willing to share? Wisconcom 23:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)