Essay talk:Why Conservapedia is Right and You Are Wrong

XD -- 13:32, 13 April 2009 (EDT)

Suggestions

 * Link to "bring up something unrelated" Andy is referring to an edit with word count of 666. The character count is 664, and only if you use windows and add a \n then it will get 666 characters (I don't suppose the user added the newline himself as well).  Perhaps "make up" instead of "bring up"?
 * One of the "Open your mind" should link to the article in conservapedia namespace.
 * Christianity and Conservatism counts as two ideologies, unless you classify Christianity as a religion, then perhaps you need a different unit set in "Being open minded MEANS accepting Christianity and conservatism as the one dominant ideology over others"? or do you mean "Christian Conservatism"?
 * Once you are labelled as a liberal by those guys (which the rule is rather arbitrary) you got permabanned (perhaps they don't think they have the remedy to change you). Hence there is no remedy for liberalism.  "Open mind" is used when you show signs of liberalism but they have yet label you as a liberal, so perhaps early treatment?

17:01, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Andy is SO right that even the bible itself is wrong. Add something about this silliness.

The earliest, most authentic manuscripts lack this verse set forth at Luke 23:34:[4]

Jesus said, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing."

Is this a liberal corruption of the original? This does not appear in any other Gospel, and the simple fact is that some of the persecutors of Jesus did know what they were doing. This quotation is a favorite of liberals but should not appear in a conservative Bible. 17:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)