User talk:Prince of Glantri:Archive 1

--ZooGuard (talk) 08:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry - in a manner of speaking
I apologize, to a degree, for my recent vandalism to Sigmund Freud. I appreciate that RationalWiki is run by volunteers, and I don't doubt that they don't see reverting my vandalism as an enjoyable use of their time. The article, nonetheless, is an absolute disgrace, even given that it's not actually meant to be an encyclopedia article. It's a sad example of the prejudices of those people who most strongly pride themselves on being free from prejudice, and if it's meant to be funny, it fails badly. Prince of Glantri (talk) 05:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

When my block expires, I'm going to provide a list of errors and misstatements in that article. It's going to be long (nearly everything about the article is wrong to a greater or lesser degree, starting with the lead statements, eg the assertion that the unconscious is "the idea that human beings are not always aware of their own motivations", a really dumb mis-definition). RationalWiki editors can ignore my suggestions if they like, but I'll say my piece. Prince of Glantri (talk) 05:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * It has expired. Go to the talk page to duke it out with people (not me) who know something about the subject. Peter Monomorium antarcticum 05:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * It hasn't expired, since my IP is still blocked. Prince of Glantri (talk) 05:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Frederick Crews
Sorry about this, nut we don't simply copy Wikipedia for our articles. It's always better to build an article up from the bottom, then it's more likely to folow our style. thanks. Bicycle wheel  08:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)