Talk:Titus Livius

Deletenom for being, as I said, completely unnecessary. 04:57, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * seconded. P-Foster (talk) 04:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Unless Livy's being used to support some kind of pseudo-history, delete. The only thing I can think of that would be relevant is actually examining in-depth his inaccuracies, but no historian accepts Livy at face value anyway (though I'm reading some of his stuff for class, it's actually pretty interesting as far as historic narratives go).  ThunderkatzHo! 07:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)