Talk:Transsexual.org

Worse
Now it doesn't just refuse to load, it entirely redirects me to my cable provider lol. They wiped their domain. I wonder if this article had anything to do with it. Kosterortiizbrock (talk) 03:57, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Is this bad luck for a first shot at article writing? (also: transsexual.org on isup.me)
 * I tried that already, they probably saw this article when searching for their site. I have only written one article (or rather started it) and it was only the grassroots so what would I know. Nobody else was acting on it at all despite all the votes. Kosterortiizbrock (talk) 04:11, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Unlikely; Google takes probs 24hr to crawl. And they probs don't care. 04:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Use the web archive. 04:21, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Haha..ha..agreed..but can you clarify more? May sound a little stupid and awkward, but I'm not getting the lexicon. TipuSultanInDisguise (talk) 04:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Unlikely; Google usually takes 24 hours to add new webpages to its results, which is likely the only way that transexual.org would find out about this article. Besides, transexual.org probably doesn't give two shits about what some wiki says. 04:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree on all statements except the closing one- this wiki has thousands of unique visitors every 5 months. It is also a thorough criticism so I was reckoning it would be more impacting. TipuSultanInDisguise (talk) 04:44, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Is there a compelling argument against the use of archive.org? is it on mission for RW to have an article on something that doesn't exist?catb0t(Totally Not A Bot!) 04:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Please sign your username! Anyway, I'm not too sure but isn't Archive.com as a domain being sold right now? This is a complex issue- is there any reliable mention of the website outside of the now down site? TipuSultanInaVeryConvincingDisguise (talk) 04:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Up!
Welp, http://transsexual.org is up again! catb0t(Totally Not A Bot!) 15:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Calls "transsexuality" [sic] a "birth defect," like some sort of mental disability, rather than a neurological peculiarty.
Actually, they probably mean it's a physical birth defect, because the genitals are the wrong ones etc. 142.124.55.236 (talk) 19:49, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Jennifer's fanfiction
Oh boy...Jennifer's fanfiction should at least be mentioned because it is a large part of her infamy online, especially in MLP. Just a link to her account with a warning about how misanthropic her work is. 75.38.196.210 (talk) 23:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * And I play video games in my spare time. However, playing video games is not related to political views, nor is weird fan-fiction. 16:24, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * We ain't celebrity gossip. 04:25, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

One not so crazy concept
This one statement in the article: "It even gives tips on how to cheat on psychology tests for sex reassignment surgery, something no sane person, transgender or otherwise, would ever recommend or seriously consider." Actually, that's the least crazy thing on the website. It's pretty mainstream (sadly, still) in trans communities that it's acceptable to lie to psychologist as necessary. Psychologists can have some pretty idiosyncratic beliefs and criteria on who qualifies, for example see autogynephilia. Sex-focused and otherwise stereeotyping. What's the right answer to, for example, "Tell me your sexual fantasies.", when wrong answers means no healthcare and no legal existence for another few years? It's not exactly "something no sane person [...] would ever recommend or seriously consider" to want to know how to answer that for the least amount of trouble. Looi (talk) 17:55, 5 April 2022 (UTC)