User talk:RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor

Max props on the name. - User   23:06, 15 February 2009 (EST)
 * Thank you my mathematically-inspired friend. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 23:11, 15 February 2009 (EST)
 * I like the name. I do not like the user page. --"CURtalk 13:30, 16 February 2009 (EST)
 * I like to Bother. My brain is just hard-wired that way. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 13:32, 16 February 2009 (EST)
 * I do not appreciate your tone when reporting on me. You just have to remind me, don't you? --"CURtalk 13:33, 16 February 2009 (EST)
 * You wouldn't happen to be Fall down, would you? --"CURtalk 13:31, 16 February 2009 (EST)
 * No. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 13:32, 16 February 2009 (EST)

Botherkin
I've heard of Botherkins before. It must not be as rare as I thought though.DSFARGEG 15:52, 16 February 2009 (EST)
 * Mind telling us how someone who didn't register before the incident knows so much about it? --"CURtalk 20:02, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * And their name is really similar to yours as well. Such a coincidence it's almost spooky.   20:05, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * RWWUR is more then what he/she seems. He/she knows things that they shouldn't know. They pick a username similar to my own, when I am not very prominent here. They know about something, that, according to yourself, never got much past HCM 5. So what gives? Something is going on here. --"CURtalk 20:08, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * CUR wake up this person is clearly an already established user's sock. They are making fun of you becuase you make such a pratt of yourself. - User   20:09, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * So I haven't brought the subject up in a few months, everybody is going about their duties, and this **** comes and attempts to sow conflict and discord? Excuse me, but that doesn't seem like behavior from a respected user. This person is attempting to harrass me, and any user who created a sock for that purpose is a coward afraid to show their face. --"CURtalk 20:13, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * wat DSFARGEG 20:03, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * I AM SPARTICUS DSFARGEG 20:14, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Message from the RationalWiki Ministry of Demotion and Personal Impediment
Many thanks. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 20:07, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * Dang you, RWWUR. If you don't stop calling me wolf-boy, I will personally make your life hell. --"CURtalk 20:09, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * Pi, this user's edits were almost exclusively intended to harrass me. --"CURtalk 20:11, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * No most of them are to Fun:RationalWikiWikiWiki. Together we plan to bring RationalWikiWiki down and let HCMs run free all over RationalWiki. WaHaHaHaHa!!! - User   20:13, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * Congrats RWWUR. If you stop calling him Wolf-Boy, I will personally make your life hell.  DSFARGEG 20:12, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * Bunchaletters--blow me. CUR--my edits are all almost exclusively meant to poke fun at RWW...if you're going to play there, you're gonna get teased. Deal with it. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 20:15, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * Then stop calling me wolf-boy. --"CURtalk 20:18, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * It is our nickname for you, like 🇰🇪. - User   20:23, 17 February 2009 (EST)

(EC)20:23, 17 February 2009 (EST)OOH! OOH! Can we have a template, something like our 🇰🇪 template?User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 20:26, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * Groans. If you are going to call me anything, it should be either ConservapediaUndergroundResistor (or some varient), CUR, Acionyx, etc. Not something demeaning. --"CURtalk 20:28, 17 February 2009 (EST)


 * How about Acionyx? Or just plain CUR? --"CURtalk 20:25, 17 February 2009 (EST)

I HAVE IT!!! Isn't that right,  &#9829;  C U R D o l l   &#9829;
 * No. --"CURtalk 20:38, 17 February 2009 (EST)


 * Disregard that, I think it's fabulous!  &#9829;  W O L F B O Y   &#9829;

Come, my apprentice, and we will make new templates, and eventually RULE THE RATIONALWIKI!!!!User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 20:44, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * NO! NO! NOOOOOOOOOO!!! --"CURtalk 20:47, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Pitiful fool. Only now, at the end, do you realize the RWWUR was a sock, soley for estabishing my NEW...  GALACTIC...   CUR TEMPLATES!!!! User:TheemperorUser talk:Theemperor 20:51, 17 February 2009 (EST)


 * <manipulation of force-lightning into biosuit>Size does not, matter, fool! Your end, it shall be.</manipulation, yeah, yeah> --"CURtalk 20:53, 17 February 2009 (EST)


 * I am ready my master. Teach me your ancient ways.DSFARGEG 20:49, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * We shall re-double our efforts. DSFARGEG 20:52, 17 February 2009 (EST)
 * In the interest of de-spamming RWWUR with "New Message" templates, I am going to have to ask the Dark Lord and his Apprentice to scoot. M'kay?
 * Sir Javascap, the Order of the Blue Link rides tonight! We must fight the evil Order of the Red Link (uuhhhh, the Emperor and Vader). --"CURtalk 20:55, 17 February 2009 (EST)


 * But this page is my only sock! DSFARGEG 20:57, 17 February 2009 (EST)


 * That would explain quite a lot. I will destroy you! <fires freeze ray and rakes claws across DSFARGEG's face> --"CURtalk 21:01, 17 February 2009 (EST)

WIGO RWW
Why did you have to draw attention to it? My defences are already crippled from accidentally stumbling into the TVTropes wiki. 13:11, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * My self-appointed role is to reveal to all what a vibrant intellectual community sheer bloody waste of time RWW is. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 13:20, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * If RWW is a waste of time, why waste people's time telling them it's a waste of time? That's just a waste of time. Totnesmartin 13:48, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * And now the CUR will be on the warpath against me. 13:49, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * No, I won't. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 16:59, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * No, just this idiot. --"<font color="#00FF6E" face="comic sans ms">Input <font color="FF00FB" face="Monotype Corsiva" size="3"> The Resistor <font color="00AEFF" face="Curlz MT">Output 17:36, 3 March 2009 (EST)

Admin Abuse (YES!)
Can I take this user to admin abuse for restoring a photo the community decided to remove? --<font color="#00FF6E" face="comic sans ms">Input <font color="FF00FB" face="Monotype Corsiva" size="3"> The Resistor <font color="00AEFF" face="Curlz MT">Output 18:51, 4 March 2009 (EST)

Daft cunt
Stop fucking with MY page. Yes, that means you, daft cunt. Fox 16:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * So archive it, spunkbreath. Fox 16:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * That would be your job. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 16:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Fuck off cock knocker. &mdash; Unsigned, by: Fox / talk / contribs
 * Charming. Have you been drinking? RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 16:46, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I have a very odd feeling that Fox is not quite himself this fine morning. 16:46, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed. 16:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Afternoon, his time. When do the pubs open? RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 16:48, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Who is this little cunt?
Who the fuck gives you the right to edit mine and others userpages? You little bastard. You're CUR aren't you? MarcusCicero 20:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Oooh, I love guessing games!!! I guess that tey are Ace McWicked! 20:33, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Nah, CUR's gone and not coming back - genuinely. It's probably TK. 20:38, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah ha! I never thought TK. Good point Josh! 20:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Wrong on all counts. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor (talk) 05:50, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * See? Not TK. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor (talk) 02:56, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * P-Foster? ТyUser_talk:Tyrannis 02:57, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

TK's User Page
Please stop reverting. Everyone agrees that edit is not acceptable. 21:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Whatever happened to all the fun in the world? RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor (talk) 21:57, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * fun is fun. Plastering a user's personal page with offensive images is not fun.  22:01, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Why do we even have that image?  22:03, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You could say it is fraught with problems? &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 22:03, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I uploaded that image for the Ken Quote Gen. It is superb. Acei9 22:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * EC EC EC I might think of the image as "fun," "funny," or certainly "hot," but not "offensive." But maybe that's me. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor (talk) 22:08, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Use some common sense... Apply the reasonable person test... How would the average person react if you flashed this picture to them in some public place.... You'd probably be arrested. 22:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)