User talk:Judge King/Sovereign Class History

Hmm... MarcusCicero (talk) 10:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not often I'm on the same side as MC but I don't see this as particularly fitting to our mission, not does it add lulz. Silver Sloth (talk) 10:33, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It is an essay, not an article. 10:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Personally I think essay are of a differant standard to mainspace articles. And as such, they are essays. Ace McWickedModel 500 10:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Heh, one could start a whole little subwiki with a load of essays that need have nothing to do with RW.  10:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

I think we should put our foot (feet?) down here and userfy it. 11:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * To be honest, this is why I stopped hanging around on Star Trek forums. 12:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

That screenshot
...Is of very dubious copyright status. 13:43, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Unlike a lot of other images of very dubious copyright status, this one is at least relevant to the article. Nx (talk) 14:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, it still needs a Fair Use rationale. 14:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Can we justify Fair Use pictures for off-mission articles? Totnesmartin (talk) 18:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Can we justify Fair Use pictures for userboxes? Nx (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The userbox pictures are at least low res. 18:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I was too lazy to download, resize and upload the image. Nx (talk) 18:54, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * at that resolution, it had to have been somewhat cropped or resized? 2.37:1? A pretty dodgy rationale, but... meh. &mdash; Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 19:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ideally, I would delete it, but as Nx points out, we have lots of other images with dodgy rationales here. 19:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * This is released under CC 3.0 if it helps. 19:04, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Let us consult the author. 19:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)