RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Bonesandbehaviours

Bonesandbehaviours | Result: merged into Henry Stevens

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete

 * 1) A deleted forum (from 4 years ago) that virtually no one knows about and that only had less than 10 users. All that remains of the forum is a single archive.is screenshot. The admin of the forum himself has his own article: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Henry_Stevens Agent47 (talk) 13:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * 2) Most of the content in the page can be stripped, and it should have only a very short mention in the Henry Stevens article. 19:09, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * 3) Only the stuff pertaining to The Races of Europe seems particularly relevant and unique vis-a-vis the contents of the Henry Stevens article, so I agree with LeftyGreenMario that this is more of a nuke than a chop job. Leave a redirect, though, to forestall a resurrection of this page. ScepticWombat (talk) 09:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Its been a week, about time to delete the article now?Agent47 (talk) 19:57, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * More votes are for merge/redirect. You should move relevant content to the appropriate article and change this article to a redirect to that article, maybe with an anchor to the subsection. 00:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * 🐐 Done. Regards, Cosmikdebris (talk) 00:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Merge/redirect

 * 1) Merge into Henry Stevens. Cosmikdebris (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * 2) Above reason. 22:03, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * 3) Merge 22:05, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * 23:12, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Merge, but what does HBD mean? It just unhelpfully links to racialism. —Kazitor, pending 01:47, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Human biodiversity (e.g. Hbdchick); as it says in the second paragraph in racialism: ”Very few racialists call themselves "racialist". Their preferred labels include [...] human biodiversity or HBD (post–2010).” ScepticWombat (talk) 05:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks. Surely that means the article shouldn't even use that term (at least not without sarcasm quotes)? —Kazitor, pending 06:05, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I’m not sure sarcasm quotes are necessary as the term is “ingroup lingo”/jargon, not typically used by others. Similarly, we don’t usually put sarcasm quotes around the tonnes of ”ingroup lingo”/jargon used in the manosphere. ScepticWombat (talk) 06:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)