Talk:Poe Paradox

Actually I wonder if it should be called "Poe Paradox", since Poe did not formulate it. It is a paradox based on Poe...  ħ uman  16:46, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Should this be expressed more generally, or is it appropriate to leave it as specific to CP?--Damo2353 17:02, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, and yes. The "original" should stay is it is, but a well-written more generalized version should be presented first one we work it out.  ħ uman  17:31, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I would tend to agree that this should be "The Poe Paradox" rather than "Poe's Paradox", for the same reason. It's basically a logical consquence of Poe's Law The Lay Scientist 19:11, 13 July 2008 (EDT)

Generalization
I had a go at generalizing it... feel free to criticize :) The Lay Scientist 19:07, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I moved it. I also removed the link to your blog, since you coined it here, not there.  If I am wrong, feel free to add an EL to where you discuss it there...  ħ uman  19:42, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Fair enough... now I'll have to upgrade my user page to something more befitting the man who came up with the Poe Paradox :S The Lay Scientist 21:40, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Absolutely!  ħ uman  22:49, 13 July 2008 (EDT)