Talk:TA

Delete
There's no need for a for page that nothing leads to, is there? Sophie Wilder  22:34, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Are these common acronyms? Landmartian (talk) 22:39, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Very, but I don't think they're used on RW. Sophie  Wilder silverbrain.png 22:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * You guys need to respect this article's long and glorious heritage and burn it with fire. 01:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * That's three sysops saying delete (so out it goes under the old way of doing things) but I'll give it a bit longer so others can chip in. Sophie  Wilder silverbrain.png 17:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Going once... Bicycle  wheel silverbrain.png 12:06, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Lose it in an abyssal trench. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 15:55, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

All right, that's enough sysops to form a pitchfork-bearing mob. TO DEATH! 16:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * It always led somewhere unless I'm missing something. It was first a redirect. Disagree with where it went if you want, but you never bothered articulating any such objection. And then it was a disambiguation page, which I always thought was uncontroversial. How is the fact that nothing leads to such a page relevant to whether it ought to exist? Where's the merits discussion here?


 * If you read the original properly, it was about what it lead from. That's "FROM." If that's your reading ability, I'm amazed that you became a lawyer. Bicycle  wheel silverbrain.png 16:55, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Redirect to TheAmazingAtheist, author of Tits vs. Ass: The Final Showdown. Landmartian (talk) 17:54, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * In bowdlerized terms, T&A means Tenderness and Affection. Seriously, I'm tempted to redirect it to Transactional Analysis, since that article uses the acronym a lot, while Technical analysis does not. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 18:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Read the second to last sentence I wrote, if you can. Just covering all bases since you failed to articulate a single good justification for deleting the page, and didn't even get what you offered right. Nutty Roux (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I would say delete, one could make it a subpage of TheAmazingAsshole's article.--Palaeonictis (talk) 23:32, 1 January 2015 (UTC)