Forum:This is how you've treated me, MarcusCicero, so far.

A recap of how you have treated me thus far
Me - Hello!

You - Fuck off MarcusCicero.

Me - I'm not MarcusCicero!

You - Fuck off.

Me - OK.

You - stop trolling.

Me - Erm.. Sorry?

You - I can't believe it! He's trolling all the fucking time! Why can't we just ban his ass and get back to having some fucking fun?

Me - Is this the way you treat all new members?

You - You're overplaying your hand.

Me - OK. I'm sorry.

You - fuck off.

Me - Hi, just after getting back to college here and I can't post properly with my college IP. Can someone help out?

You - You're a dick. I'll see what I can do.

Me - I'm still having problems.

You - I know. I tried, and I don't think you can post properly. To be honest I couldn't give a shit.

Me - Well hold on a second. This affects 15,000 people.

You - Fuck off. I don't care.



Pretty apt, eh? EdmundBurke (talk) 13:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * "Fuck off. I don't care" 13:07, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Is this an extract from that play you're writing? I must say it's very avant-garde.   15:57, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * [[image:Cry.gif]] Sterile 16:24, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * What a pity. I think I have the world's smallest violin in my desk somewhere, let me play you a song...  -- 19:52, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Excellent choice of sock name: homophone: berk - Rhyming Slang, short for 'Berkshire Hunt', meaning 'cunt'. 20:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Think I've missed the history here. Could someone give me the other side?--Mustex (talk) 22:14, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * EB is a sock of MC denying it & asking that his Uni IP be unblocked. 22:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * "Edmund Burke" was regarded by many as the father of modern conservatism . Coincidence? Definite troll value there to begin with. Initially, I associated the EdmundBurke name with the underhanded sleaziness of "Mr. Burke", of Fallout 3 fame. That kind of fell flat with all of his fucking crying and whining, however. The Foxhole Atheist (talk) 18:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Wages of sin, EB/MC.--Tom Moore fiat justitia 22:42, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Fuck this guy. No other community--virtual or real-life--would have put up with a quarter of his shit. Fuck him up the ass. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 22:43, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Shut up MC and stop whining. We know it's you, because there can't be TWO people in one Irish college who know how to use a computer. 09:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha! I've been following this controversy with interest. I somehow manage to troll you even when I'm not around. You people are such dweebs. 15:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Ok, could someone tell me who MC is, and what he did?--Mustex (talk) 15:32, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * MC is the whipping boy of the SeriousWiki Cabal. But for some reason, he has complete power over them. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 15:47, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * And here I thought people just liked making fun of him. Trolling sure is complicated these days. ~ Kupochama[1][2] 17:55, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If it's fun for you that's a good thing. For many in the Cabal, it's not so fun. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 17:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no cabal.  18:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Umm....could anyone give me concrete examples of what, exactly, he's done?--Mustex (talk) 20:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Click "Show" on the "Thinking of Unbinning MarcusCicero?" template above. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:37, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks.--Mustex (talk) 21:15, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Basically I have several sock accounts which decide the direction of this website. I'm slowly making it more and more frivolous and dweebish. The best thing about it is that my socks don't have that much work to do; idiots such as Corry or TOP here are much more capable of bringing this site into disrepute than I. Also - a few words on Corry. What an idiot! How do you tolerate him? He's ludicrously self important and boring. He has no sense of humour and is genuinely a fat twat with no friends. Lose that freak, now.
 * EB is not my sock, but I'm loving the persecution! Its amazing how easily I can ruin this place without being directly involved. You cunts are the cause of your own destruction. MarcusCicero (talk) 09:50, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You either have too much spare time if you can construct the elaborate scheme you claim or the worst internet debater of all time ("I WANT YOU TO BAN ME, COZ THAT MEANS I CONTROL YOU ALL, YOU ARE PUPPETS IN MY GAME"). Either way it makes you a sad loser. If you want to waste that much time being a sad loser on the internet, you can make actual money on those MMORPGs. 10:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, and yes EB is you. If it wasn't you then he'd be using his once every half hour edit to make a useful contribution to the site to prove his worth rather than whining about being blocked and being mistreated in the same writing style as you. You don't control anything about this site. You are a minor annoyance and we love watching you suffer with your restricted edits. I might just revert all of your edits each time you make them for fun, so you have to wait another half hour before trying again. 10:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * MarcusCicero: A petulant child pretending to be an intelligent man. I think the only thing he has controlled so far on the site is how much his detractors post, and even then he still hasn't done any lasting damage to the credibility or the site itself. In other words, even the other trolls can spot your fail. Stop trying. -- CodyH (talk) 10:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I once trolled a forum right off the internet. The guy got so sick of me coming around that he just put up a notice one day saying he was going to let his DNS expire in a few week and the site would be gone because he was no longer going to pay for my playpen and the site was not living up to the "free, intellectual debate" he hoped it would be, instead it was a place full off groupthink and all anyone wanted to do was make posts about a troll. When it was over I laughed for a while, but then I realised I had wasted hours of time when I couldn't even read the old conversations any more. We can all learn a lot from this story. 10:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * MC is basically just doing this because he's failing his college course and has no friends to talk to. So he spends all his time trying to wind people up here. It is funny to watch him squealing about only being able to edit twice an hour. 11:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah that sounds like it. But now I have a degree and a life, but I have just discovered someone restarted that old forum last year... I can feel it pulling me back. Hold me back Crundy! 11:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't do it man! Smoke some crack to take your mind off it. 11:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Too late. I posted under my old handle, as soon as they see the name they are going to come rushing to try and "pwn me". 11:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You realise you're gonna have to tell us the name of the site now? Why not send MC over there? At least he has a good chance of actually destroying that site. 11:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If I can find the epic thread where I argued against the existence of logic I'll post it. 11:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

There's nothing more delightfully quaint than the delusions of the self assured. MarcusCicero (talk) 10:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * MC, That's a very frank admission. It is on occasion quaint, but most of the time it's like listening to some nutjob who's in orbit, and every 30 minutes he flies overhead yelling something at the morbidly curious people below. -- 11:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * One need only tarry a few moments to understand the vacuousness of this place. None of you have even an iota of intellectual credibility. My socks will from now on go into overdrive and destroy this website from the seams. I've been building up to it, but when my socks strike in unison - its gonna be epic. MarcusCicero (talk) 13:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * We look forward to it. 13:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I can see it now. A lonely college nerd staring at his screen, logging on with his socks, and shouting "Tonight, We dine in Conservapedia!"
 * I think you have a case of unwarranted self-importance, MC. Plus a small touch of dementia, coated over with some serious ego issues. You are not Anonymous, you are not important, you are not epic. Stop fooling yourself. -- CodyH (talk) 13:20, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yawn. Bring it on MC. Oh and by the way, just because you have a thesaurus doesn't mean you're intelligent. If you were you'd be spending your time doing your college work. 13:21, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Silence, idiot. When I'm done the very foundations of this hall of ignominy will shudder. The absurdity of your existence will be revealed. The mystic revelation of superior intellect will humble you. Cast down beneath the pigeons, shall you lie and beg for my benevolent forgiveness. Rationalwiki as an institution will be teared asunder and will return to the earth, from whence it came.
 * Do you not feel sorry? Can you not see the absurdity in treating me, the mighty MarcusCicero, with such contempt? I hold you beneath contempt, vile underlings. I tell you solemnly, by the time the third cock crows, your website shall be no more.
 * My intellect is superior - it is almost omnipresent, four dimensional. I am everywhere simultaneously as I am the soul of a voice of reason that has never died. Long will you spend begging me for forgiveness. Fools. MarcusCicero (talk) 13:34, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol, you're funny. 13:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually I'm saving that paragraph. It actually did make me laugh out loud. 13:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * MC, you have been threatening to "Take RW down" for months now. You are beginning to sound like Ken with non-exsitent "Operations". Are waves of MC material going to be hitting RW soon? Are our boats sea worthy? Acei9 19:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Conveniently placed edit button

 * If these socks you have lined up are half as hilarious as you are, I really can't wait to see what's in store when your grand plan reaches fruition. On an unrelated note, all that abuse seems to have turned me on a bit. 13:55, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh for Gods sake. Why do you compare me and him? This is really getting on my nerves. What have I actually done that has ever offended somebody here? Just have a look at the Edmund Burke article. I want to edit it but am unable. This is so unfair. I don't know why I try, really. EdmundBurke (talk) 14:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Neither do we, Marcus. 15:01, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes we do, it's because it's the only way he can get hard. 15:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Can't you change the posting interval for them to 15 minutes? The comments are delicious. — Pietrow   ☏  15:33, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

You know what? Fuck you.
Thanks for being such a prick Tom. I don't understand why you think its Ok to treat someone like this when you have absolutely no evidence of their deceit. You CAN CHECK THE LOGS. 15,000 people cannot use this site because of your pig headedness. Fuck this shit, I'm going home. See ya.

Also, delete that Edmund Burke article. You fuckers haven't the intelligence to understand it. EdmundBurke (talk) 13:01, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Let's see now.
 * poor quality socking
 * foul language
 * bizarre focus on Tom Moore
 * claims of unmatched intelligence
 * "I'm going home"
 * Pretty sure I just won Marcus Bingo. --  = w =  19:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Done.  18:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC)  I tried.   18:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Boo-fuckin'-hoo, MC. The Foxhole Atheist (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * BUT THINK OF THE 15,000 VICTIMS OF OUR CRIME!!!! 15:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll always be better at this than you, MC. See you next week.--Tom Moore fiat justitia 16:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Just go and fuck yourself TomMoore. Finished reading whatever poncy shit you like to broadcast on your userpage? Pretentious twat. Go fuck off. EdmundBurke (talk) 16:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * All hail the illustrious MarcusCicero EdmundBurke who the fuck cares... Master of jacking off using his tears for lube the puppet strings. Seriously, crybaby, take your 15,000 rape victims to a shelter or something. The Foxhole Atheist (talk) 18:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 18:24, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

*Yawn*
...so I wake up after falling asleep studying, and this is what I come back to? Shit, people, why are we letting RW turn into MarcusCiceroWiki? 18:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This should never have been pared off from the Saloon Bar. It would have been archived soon enough.   18:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, after realising that you morons are never ever going to get rid of this twat for good (by blocking the IP completely) I'm going into ignore mode. This is the last thing I'm posting on the MC subject, and will revert any of his dipshit posts in my domain(s) and urge you all to do the same. 19:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Sooooo.......
How about the Super Bowl teams this year? I know I'm rooting for the New Orleans Saints, while Π said he's rooting for the Indianapolis Colts. But which team are others in the mob rooting for and how do you think the game will unfold? 19:17, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Dunno about you, but my money is on Sea Biscuit to come first again. Acei9 19:20, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Sea Biscuit, you say? See, I put my money on Santa's Little Helper this year. It's true Santa's Little Helper has been weak in the past, but this year, I think he's got a good chance. 20:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I have to root for the Saints. I have a Saints jersey (albeit a circa 1993 Jim "Chris" Everett one).   20:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought the Vikings or the Packers had a chance this year. er how are they doing ? Hamster (talk) 20:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Nah, the Frotters are the ones to watch, trust me. 21:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Cunts
You fucking pricks are awful cunts &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) (On behalf of MC)
 * Does mean I am no longer a fucking prick because instead I am an awful cunt? Acei9 18:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd have to imagine they were mutually exclusive by nature. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

More crap
Hi there

I write for a satirical internet magazine, and am interested in writing a story of how 'MarcusCicero' trolled this website so frequently. Now Marcus has been kind enough to respond to an email, so I have enough from his end. What I now require is your perspective. Anyone care to offer any opinions?
 * Not really. What's the magazine? --Kels (talk) 22:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I'd rather not say until its finished. Its a website, not a magazine.
 * on the off chance that you're not MarcusCicero, you'd have to prove yourself before anyone would speak to you with candor. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 22:23, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Either way, I can't see why you wouldn't even identify yourself or who you're writing for if you hope to have people take you seriously. --Kels (talk) 22:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Stop being so idiotic and churlish. Just answer the damn question.
 * I always wondered where the Colbert writers were lurking... &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 22:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh, Marcus, you never cease to amuse. What will you think of next? 22:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC) What will you think of next? Given up the birdwanking yet? OMG (talk) 22:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 22:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You're a cunt. OMG (talk) 22:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * --Kels (talk) 22:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I confess, Oh God I confess!

I admit it! I only want your social acceptance! I'm sorry for all my sin! I only ever want to be part of your super cool group of internet weirdos! So here is my completely unabridged apology, fruitcakes. Read it and weep. (You especially, TOP. Loser) OMG (talk) 22:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC) "Put the B after the number."

- Richard Williams