User talk:Stabby the Misanthrope/Archive12

A fond rewelcoming from Marcus Tullius Cicero
''Ah, that's okay—all is forgiven. Regarding why I left, that is a partial reason for it, but I mostly left because I simply felt it was time to move on. Essayist RA Talk to me _ 06:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC) ''

Why don't you just go and fuck away off then? No-one likes you here, and you're hardly been greeted with open arms. Fuckface. Now unblock me on RWW.


 * Sic semper something. 14:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Marcus Cicero, everybody! A real class act, every bit the worthy heir of a great Roman orator, eh? Razor-sharp wit and towering intellect and all that! Man…only in my wildest, most ecstatic dreams can I aspire to the heights of such potent yet subtle mockery as “fuckface”. I, like the rest of the dullards and plebeians on this prolix little wiki, have to resort to using rhetoric when I want to send a message, but Marcus? No, he has ascended! He is a post-rhetorician who has discarded such mundane concerns as pathos, logos, and ethos—a man who only needs one tool to get his message across: Blistering, cutting profanity. Indeed, he is a colossus astride the English language! Bravo! BRAVO!


 * No, but seriously, glad to have you back, RA. The electrocutioner (talk) 00:53, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I appreciate you welcoming me back, but must you feed the troll while doing so?  01:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Then again, I did the same thing down below. Nevermind...  : }   01:18, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Good to see you.
Always nice to see an old-timer. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 14:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Welcome back. As TOP says, it's always good to see people show up again. :-) --BobNot Jim 14:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Welcome back, the only other person who cares about categories! Totnesmartin (talk) 15:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * RA! 17:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Geez, I haven't seen you in forever. Welcome back. 17:53, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, guys! It's nice seeing you all!   21:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey there, welcome back! 21:31, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, quite a nice surprise. I thought you were all "screw you guys, I'm going home!" 21:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I was...  21:55, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * What were you doing in the intermediate time? 22:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * A lot of things. I built a new (gaming) computer, I got a temp job at a radio station, visited my older brother in New York City, worked on my Command & Conquer skills, helped my other brother move back into our house (where we play C&C games with each other), and met my NYC older brother's girlfriend when he came over for Thanksgiving.   23:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I had a pretty awesome year too. I bought a stick of gum in July and it was pretty good. I joined about the time when you left, so hello! 23:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, welcome back. Corry (talk) 00:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * God damn. I feel so old.  I can hardly believe that(not that this is a reflection on them) there are people going "ooh, it's that cool guy all the old people all talk about!", and I'm going "How could you not know RA?".  It really hit me a couple of weeks ago when Mei returned and SJ was said "Who the fuck are you and why are you being useful all over my wiki?".  I remember back in the heydays of CUR, when we used too...  Okay, moment of weakness over.  We can all get along with our lives now.  -- 01:43, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice to have you back. 03:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * This happens with forums all the time. I popped back to one of my old haunts and there was a lot of "who the hell are you?!?" from both ends. 14:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Was on holiday and arrive to see you are back. Always nice to see old faces. Aceof Spades 03:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

As you may or may not have noticed, I'm still the same old prick I used to be. But I do like "working together", whatever that means. A sincere welcome back to you. You were missed. 07:15, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

I hold you beneath contempt.
You progressive perfidity is only prolonged by your pallative plonkerism. Please peruse this pathetic site but on your perambulations will you also preface your pacifist patheticness with an appropriate pallour. Now kindly fuck off. (The power of P compells you) 134.226.1.229 (talk) 15:11, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you just said, MC's IP, but I congratulate you on your newfound ability to use a thesaurus.  03:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * “Watch me paralyze this pathetic palooka with a powerful, paralyzing, perfect pachydermous percussion pitch!” - Bugs Bunny.  02:12, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi
Glad to be a member, thanks for welcoming me! Oddvids (talk) 03:02, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Take this, you coward!
Since I am suffering my annual bouts with chronic insomnia, I thought I take it out on you, since I haven't sent my goon squad after you yet. Mwahahahahaha!!!!!! 07:15, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No, no, no, "annual" means it withers up and dies when the season passes. If you mean it comes back regularly, then your insomnia is "perennial".  : )   07:24, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Technicality, technicality, technicality. For that, my goons are gonna punch extra hard.  15:34, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Vandal Bin
So let me guess this straight....I block a known vandal as you (a poor joke maybe but that's not the issue), you take offence, accuse me of Karajou behaviour and vandal bin me despite the fact there is know vandalism. Someone points out that, RA, you haven't been here awhile and we have a long standing issue with this vandal. You whine about it but keep me vandal binned. So my question to you is, whats your fucking problem? Regardless of whether or not I can unvandal myself, why do it in the first place? To make a point? Aceof Spades 19:05, 17 December 2009 (UTC) Forget it. Aceof Spades 19:08, 17 December 2009 (UTC)


 * The return of RA is much better than anything I ever could have cooked up. In his earnestness, RA really does troll more than any determined willing troll on the internet. In his quest to be a humourless dullard, he pisses off everyone on the website. In his determination to, like, categorise everything, he does useless and boring shit that no-one cares about but allows him to think of himself as 'the hard worker' of the group. He really is a remarkable creature. Now please RA, do continue fucking everyone off with your intensely dull and uncharismatic personality. And unblock me on RWW, cunt.


 * why cant you just fuck off? How old are you? 12? Aceof Spades 20:48, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

MC pointing out some home truths

 * Oh this shit is just too good. Fight more please! Ace; RA is a wankshaft who'll never have a girlfriend. RA; Ace is a twat who likes to pretend he lives even a marginally interesting life outside of internet wiki's. Fight!!!


 * P.S- Are you really going to be so obtuse over on RWW that you'll stop new account creation? Is that how petty and vindictive a little man you really are? Will you have the balls to answer this, or will you ignore it with your typical veneer of aloofness? Prick.

&mdash; Unsigned, by: the fat guy from Ellen / talk / contribs

Welcome
Wassup. --  = w =  06:43, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Wassup? Oh, nothing much.  Just moping over how, despite having had eight days to do so, no one bothered to say "Happy Chanukah" to me.  : (   06:56, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No one knows what that is. --  = w =  07:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Happy Chanukah. --  = w =  07:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Mei.  18:50, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It's Hanukkah for those with hairballs. 09:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * My cat wishes you a "Happy Chanukah", then : )   18:50, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

1:14 past the hour........
And despite the better judgement you insist I dont have.........

What the fuck happened?
Obviously, see my reply on the SB. Also, my heart aches for your confusion and loss. I hope you find a way to see through what is happening in these people who are so important to you's lives in a way you can understand. Take care, my friend. 04:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

New
Happy year! --  = w =  07:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Acei9 05:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

I was thinking of you
Just a few minutes ago.

How is the "dealing with the divorce" thing going? You sorta went away after posting that trauma. I hope you are finding good resources and coming to an understanding with how your parents' changed relationship affects, and doesn't affect, you? 05:00, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Things are going okay. Not "great" or even "well", but okay.  I still have my friends, my brothers, and my psychiatrist to help me get through it.


 * Thank you for asking.  05:20, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I was concerned.  Glad you have good resources to help you work through this.  05:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

No, wait, Gooniepunk! We mustn't let her reproduce! Ah, too late
 That's funny, most people do want me to reproduce. --  = w =  02:35, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * To your credit, you've been doing a fine job of reproducing asexually. That's what all the templates you've been spreading around are for, right?  When they reach critical mass, they'll grow into fully-formed Meis.  Think of it—an army of Meis!  Being useful all the time!  What a glorious new paradigm!   02:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * newborn Meis must consume a lot of food before becoming useful. --  = w =  05:43, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Welcoming
 Thought I'd just clarify - when welcoming users I am usually well friendly and amusing. My "dull and business" like welcome was due to the fact the I was in the middle of an argument with Ms McWicked and didn't have time.... :-)   P.S. I won the argument. Acei9 18:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I know. I just enjoy teasing you   : )
 * Ms McWicked? Oh dear...  We aren't going to have any little McWickeds running around soon, are we?   23:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You jews are all the same, after being teased by the Egyptians and the Nazis you can't help but take it out on us poor New Zealanders. We'll show you! We'll show them all! (I am now teasing you...)
 * She'll be Mrs come Feb 12th 2011. Acei9 23:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I hope you live long and happy together. EdmundBurke (talk) 23:29, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Gah! You strike straight for the heart, just like all filthy New Zealanders.  Have fun with your orcs and retarded flightless birds, unwashed heathen!   23:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You're waiting a year to make sure? A wise decision.  (Though I totally had you booked as the sort of person who would jump right into things.)   23:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hahahaha you have been taken in by the whole "Kiwiws can't fly" nonsense! Its a secret weapon in order to invade Australia and enslave the Greeks. But I can't tell you anymore. 1 year? Dude, we have been engaged since last april and together for 5 years....I jump into nothing without thinking first - except everything else. Acei9 23:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Why would you invade Australia to enslave the Greeks? Shouldn't you be invading Greece to enslave the Australians?
 * It's taken you seven years? My parents took only six months—ohshitsuddenlyeverythingmakessensenow.   23:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That was really funny RA, I just had to say. When you can laugh about it, maybe it's not so bad? I hope.  08:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * There is a significant Greek population in AUS. And I read about that on the Saloon Bar. I know how it feels - my parents split when I was 11. Though it doesn't bother me so much because my father is a prick. Acei9 00:03, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * A word of warning Ace. Living together is not the same as being married - the dynamics of the relationship change. Beforehand both parties tend to try a bit harder and be more forgiving as they know the other can walk out with few repercussions. Once there is a legal framework the partners tend to be more demanding and less tolerant of the other's shortcomings. I have known many couples who lived together for many years but then broke up after getting wed (one after only three days!).  07:57, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No, Genghis you are wrong. Marriage is just a social construct, created by the patriarchal society so that men can own women, or something, I forget the story. 08:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

You are a stupid fecker
Long ago, you ruined the RW sysopship criterion (from "made a bunch of good edits" to "edited twice"). You singlehandedly fucked up this wiki with your stupidity. Now you are here again, and want to tell us what to do? Go feck yourself. 07:53, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That's not the way I would have put, it but I'm fraid that I agree with Human's take on the situation. 08:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I apologise for my fecking language. 08:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Apology not accepted.  13:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Fuck you, Human. Fuck you.  And fuck you too, Genghis, for agreeing with the spirit of Human's mental diarrhea.
 * (1) The discussion in question is about about bureaucrats, not sysops. You could make a case that I changed the standards for sysopship for the worse (it wouldn't be a very good case, but one could be made).  But I assure you, I've barely touched the culture around bureaucratizing people.  You know how many people I've bureaucratized?  Four:  Doggedpersistence, Weaseloid, Armondikov, and Nx.
 * (2) I made a goddamn suggestion, and I made it in good faith. I was participating in the fucking mobocracy.  I was not "telling you what to do".
 * (3) I ruined the criterion for sysopship? What criterion was there in the first place?  Oh, right, there wasn't one.  So, if this unofficial criterion was so fucking important to everyone, how come no one told that?  At no point did anyone reverse my demotions, at no point was I told to stop or ease up a little, at no point was I reprimanded, and at no point was I given any indication by anyone that I was "singlehandedly fucking up this wiki".  If you valued the old criterion so much, how come you made no effort to actually participate in the mobocracy and preserve it?
 * (4) My so-called stupidity has been embraced by the mobocracy. It has been codified into the Community Standards.   My point being, the criteria for everything on this site have always been ad hoc, made up as we went along—that's the nature of the mobocracy.  And now you have the balls to take a shit on me, telling me I have no right to so much as make a mere good faith suggestion, because you don't like how one of our numerous ad hoc standards turned out.  So fuck you.   13:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, it's ONNNNNNN now! 13:43, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Awesome.--Tom Moore fiat justitia 13:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * (un indent) Mei resorts to lists yet again.


 * 1) sysopship criterion isn't ruined
 * 2) this wiki isn't fucked up
 * 3) Radioactive afikomen didn't singlehandedly change sysopship criterion
 * 4) Radiocative afikoman isn't telling anyone what to do.
 * I can't see anything to agree with here. There's no need to shout over this. It won't solve anything. Is today Fight Over Vague Disagreement Day and no one told me? --  = w =  14:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I've written it before and I'll write it again - I think that it is for the better that sysopship here is like "playing musical chairs with one more chair than players" rather than the CP "chess" model. 14:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Not much of one to get involved in interpersonal drama, but... so surprising to see this blast. From what I can see, (independant observations, haven't had much interaction with him), RA: Positive contributions, common sense, a great deal of caring. Created a discussion page to talk about crat procedure, has the right to give his opinion on page, as does anyone else. So, what the heck? Refugee talk page 22:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The on-off tensions between these two go wayyyy back, & there's a huge stock of ancient grudges & grievances between them that get dragged up every time it kicks off. Best leave 'em to it unless it turns nuclear.   00:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

It's funny- just when I think "Hey, I'm glad to see RA back, and there's been no explosions!" Human blows up with a seven out of ten on the Fox Internet Meltdown scale. Whining about RA sysoping people over a year ago? Ridiculous. Corry (talk) 00:14, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Whining about RA sysopping people shortly after sysopping TK despite there being severe reservations from the community. Ridiculous. Acei9 00:30, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

You people don't even have a goddamn clue what I am talking about, do you? = RA telling me what to do. See above, "criterion for sysopship? What criterion was there in the first place? Oh, right, there wasn't one" Now shut the hell up and forgive me my nasty language. Oh, except for, fuck off RA and quit telling me what to do. 10:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That's an even worse example, Human. Again, I wasn't telling you what to do, I was reminding you that some people still hate TK, and they probably weren't going to let your decision to sysop him go without comment.  (Which, by the way, I was correct in predicting.  Kels, TomMoore, Bob M, and Ace McWicked all opposed your decision.)  Admittedly, I should have phrased my original post exactly like I did just now, but still, where the fuck did you get "telling you what to do" out of "I don't care... You ready for the fallout?"?   23:56, 14 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Why can't we all just get along? EdmundBurke (talk) 13:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Links to userpages ar inappropriate in the body of a mainspace article.
Where did this new rule come from? Trent used to have fun linking every instance of "human" to my user page. 01:47, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree, especially if the linked user is an active editor. I know I've linked some in the past.   01:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Its a bit of fun I reckon. I am linked to some weird articles regarding slinky lesbian pillow fights. Acei9 01:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If I throw my two bits in, I reckon that superfluous linking to users is 1) a bit weak and 2) shameless egotism. However, if it's references and there's been research, or there's a relative anecdote, then it's fine. But I'd rather it was linked in name rather than just "one user" or "some" with the link hidden behind it (same as position on randomly linking to Schlafly, I suppose). 02:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Mostly it's either people saying "one RW user thinks..." which I think is fine, or, as I said, Trent (or anyone) linking to user pages to make a "joke". 02:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, it's not a rule. I just felt it was really tacky.  And, as Trent himself said, there's a lot of stuff we won't be able to get away with anymore.  I like to think that cutesy links to user's pages in mainspace articles is one of them.   02:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah yes. "Tacky" is the word I was looking for previously.
 * There's refs to "gone" users(see ) that newbies & tyhe forgetful won't unnerstand & that reinforce the "in crowd" impression for noobs. Not a good thing IMHO. 06:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I, personally, think that we should visit having refs to users here in articles on a case-by-case basis. 06:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Case by case is good, IMHO. 06:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Heads up
Hey there, Radioactive Man, what's shakin' in Radioactive Land? Hope all is well. You're missing out on some bewildering developments in the world of wikipolitics. It's a crazy roller coaster ride. 00:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * So I've heard. Good luck with all that!  : )   11:43, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Normally I'd be tripping over myself to insert myself into all the ongoing discussions, but at the moment I find things in real life to be more interesting. On top of that, I'm gearing up for school again, and after that I'll be going to school, and after that...  Well, regardless of any metamorphosis that RW goes through, I'm sure I'll be back to my usual ubiquitous, bureaucratic self sooner of later.   11:43, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. It's the usual story: rolling ahead with action after only a day or so of discussion & nothing very firmly agreed.  No harm I guess, if it achieves what it's supposed to.  Hope the real life stuff stays interesting.   20:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

LJ elections
You're semiretired. That's why I didn't vote for you, at least. One of the votes from TK is also from Neveruse, who is a half-troll. 21:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey! As someone with deep insights into the mind of a troll, I should be in the LJ, not on it's agenda. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 21:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, why are you wasting the intercom for something so minor? 21:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh stop whining. I got less votes than TK.  -- 01:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * There's another reason why I am mostly ignoring the whole LiveJournal Loya Jirga business. 03:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

w
You like reading my talk page? What things would you like me to talk about on my talk page? --  = w =  06:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, your page happens to be on my watchlist. As for what I would like you to talk about:  cat yodeling  :-)   11:42, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Why is my page on your watchlist? Do you like watching me that much? I guess I should draw the curtains more often. --  = w =  11:57, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Your page is on many people's watchlists, Mei. Everyone on this wiki is super-creepy that way.   12:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

surprise buttsex
Joey, with you it's never a surprise. Mei (talk) 00:01, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Of course it's not! True gentlemen warn people beforehand  : )   00:29, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

superior
I will now defeat you at something. I haven't decided what. Mei (talk) 19:57, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, you've already defeated me at not capitalizing section headers. How's that for a victory?  : )   20:00, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I will beat you at not being Jewish. Mei (talk) 20:03, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Remember to clean your Shabbat extra cleanly! Mei (talk) 20:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Fuck you
and your insults and stupidity. That is all. MarcusCicero 03:54, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The wording of the above clearly indicates it as the work of MarcusCicero, who has somehow gained access to Humans' account. It has been rectified accordingly.   03:58, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You two shouldn't be allowed on the same intertubes at the same time. TerrySmall.png (I am a person not a template) 04:00, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * True that. There is something about "speak unto the almighty" that rubs me the wrong way. Oh, that and him being fucking clueless and thinking the USA is all there is.  04:04, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I may be drinking - or not - but you are just being stupid. I will be sober in the morning.  What's your excuse?  04:20, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * "I will be sober in the morning." Yes, but you'll still be a creepy, aging, lifeless bachelor who lives in the middle of nowhere.  So might as well keep drinking, eh?  : )   04:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I object to the use of "bachelor" as a derogatory term. I also demand an apology, preferably in the form of RA and Human both buying me a drink. -- 05:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Interesting—both the top and bottom sections on my talk page are by morons telling me to fuck off! 04:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe you should take something away from that. 06:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I live in the middle of everywhere and I'm not a moron (or creepy or lifeless). You are a stuck up jerk, however, a pompous teenager who thinks far mopre of himself than might be justified.  That said, it's still nice to have you back, Jacob. Signed, Huw.  06:21, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

hi
--Fuck you motherfucker (talk) 02:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

thanks!
I'll be honest I felt it was a bit premature but whatever, I'm good for it. BTW what do you think of sceptical voter wiki? I think they should get a good mention somewhere on here. Solarius (talk) 18:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Your priorities are fucking weird
http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Nx&diff=next&oldid=585819 03:41, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Man, I'm having moments of poor judgment all over the place tonight.  04:02, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Eh, we all do. Just try to make them funny, or least laughable, and your friends will forgive you.  05:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Would being funny include replacing your userpage with a giant link to Lemon Party? : )   05:10, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh that would be so funny, if this was 2007. 08:24, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Help with High IQ society
Wanna help me out with some grunt work at High IQ society? If so turn up on the talk page and I'll brief you with the freaking chores I'd like assistance with. Thanks. 05:29, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I would love to! Unfortunately (for you, at least : )), right now I'm about to start a gaming session with my brother.  But I'll throw myself into it when we get done.   05:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I would also but I am drinking Heineken and waiting for my dinner to finish cooking while watching Mrs. McWicked clean the dishwasher with a toothbrush. Also, I can't be assed..(leaving the door open here for a snide comment by RA..:)..) Acei9 05:57, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks, both of you. Whenever you get a round tuit is fine. 06:00, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I got nothin', Ace.  08:30, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I am dissapointed....Acei9 08:33, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

To Wong Foo
Thanks for everything, Julie Newmar. FrankThePseudoscientist (talk) 05:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Eh?  08:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)