Fun talk:Stargate

Seeing as CUR made this little article only as a way to try and get his stupid picture in, and assuming that this is too lame even for the Fun space, do we keep it? TheoryOfPractice 20:30, 16 January 2009 (EST)
 * Wow an article too bad even for fun space, has such a thing occurred before? - User   20:32, 16 January 2009 (EST)
 * I don't know--I think the bar has been seriously raised lowered here. TheoryOfPractice 20:37, 16 January 2009 (EST)
 * I understand if you don't want to validate CUR's efforts to keep the image in question, but that is no reason to delete an article in the funspace. We have craploads of very lame articles in the funspace, so it would be hypocritical and patently unfair to delete just this one.   20:43, 16 January 2009 (EST)
 * You're right. If I weren't so hammered right now I probably wouldn't have even brought it up. TheoryOfPractice 20:44, 16 January 2009 (EST)
 * Now now now, ToP—you know it's not safe to drink and edit. : )   21:01, 16 January 2009 (EST)

No fair. Human does it all the time. TheoryOfPractice 21:13, 16 January 2009 (EST)
 * Well, being who he is, he can get away with a lot of stuff.  22:54, 16 January 2009 (EST)

This article is LAME...
...can you at least TRY to make it clever, or funny, or relevant, or something? TheoryOfPractice 18:24, 17 January 2009 (EST)
 * I'm calling on Judge King to help me. --" 18:26, 17 January 2009 (EST)

Users
We have a RationalWiki very silly angle for Star Wars. Why not this one? I'd be Rodney McKay (obvious twerp is obvious), and. . . let's see. . . Trent could be Hampton? -- 18:25, 9 April 2009 (EDT)

For fucks sake make it go
delete. AceModerator 07:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. 07:11, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Come on, someone else vote for this shit to go. AceModerator 20:17, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * delete?-- il' Dictator   Mikal  20:18, 7 April 2012 (UTC)