User talk:Idiot number 59

Hi! 14:49, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to RationalWiki, enjoy your stay! - David Gerard (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Who are numbers 1-58? -- 20:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Started with a heinzerisation by me There were no 1 - 56. 21:07, 8 July 2010 (UTC) TerrySmall.png [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]]

What are you doing here? rationalhi
 * Having fun of course. Aren't everyone else doing the same thing, but just pretending to be up to something else? --Idiot number 59 (talk) 18:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

An Idiot's Love

 * The local Idiot
 * Whose love composed
 * The lovely essense
 * Of the love that he exposed.


 * It was made to be known,
 * That the Idiot did indeed,
 * Love Susan so dearly,
 * But did Susan accede?


 * Alas, she did not,
 * She did not give any favor,
 * To the man who loved her
 * As he cried with waver...


 * "WHY?!" cried the Idiot,
 * So solemnly sad.
 * How could she not love
 * A six toed man? That's too bad.


 * Silently, he shuddered away
 * Carrying out his love from his userpage.
 * But deep within his heart, everyone knows,
 * That his love is still there, it's just in a doze.

~Super Hamster  Talk 05:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


 * A strange poem. I wish people wrote me more poems, but not such like you did. It doesn't qualify as a poem. You could learn something from my earlier works. --Idiot number 58 (talk) 05:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * My poem may be strange to some wacky fools, but what you just said is downright insane. You call my work a poem twice, then you proceed to say that it isn't. GET IT TOGETHER MAN. ~Super Hamster  Talk 05:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Chicken coop proceedings
A discussion about you has been started at RationalWiki:Chicken coop, regarding some of your behavior. If you wish to advocate for yourself you had best go there. 02:39, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Sysop
Remember, power from the cabal to lord over the people is a goat-given right of Man. -- 03:17, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Good to see you again!
22:10, 27 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh! And why do you think I'll stay in this godless idiocracy? --Idiot number 59 (talk) 09:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Because you might just learn something about how pointless such statements as that are.Several ingredients (talk) 09:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * @Idiot59: I dunno; why wouldn't you stay in this godless idiocracy? We has goats! 12:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You stay to reinforce your feeling of superiority. You need someone to despise and we fit the bill. Jack Hughes (talk) 12:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Assholes. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 16:53, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You can haz sysop back, okay? 19:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Honey, you've always seemed to be the most reasonable person out of all progressive ethicists here. Thank you. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 10:36, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Aww. *blushes* No problem. 05:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

You're on thin ice.
Ad hominem attacks are most unwelcome on this wiki, your actions here involve you telling someone to "go f*** themself" and calling someone a "stupid pig". Continuing to be disrespectful to other editors may result in a block without warning. I'm watching you.Several ingredients (talk) 23:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Continuing to be disrespectful to other edits may result in a block without warning. I'm watching you. May I point out that threats like this are as unwelcome as the Ad hominem themselves? Ace McfuckingAwesome 00:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, thank you, Ace. The person doing the blocking would be the one breaching policy, not the one making insulting comments. 01:40, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * And 59 is a sysop, so a block wouldn't be very effective anyway... 01:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I can change that. 01:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * There's nothing wrong with being insulting, really - he's pretty rude, but not particularly disruptive. People as dumb as him deserve a little tolerance and leeway, and hopefully eventually a loving home where caretakers can wipe the pureed food off his chin and gently rock him to sleep..-- 02:31, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hanlon's razor applies here. Still, if Idiot number 59 is just going to hang around to stir people up i.e be a troll, then s/he would deserve some kind of punishment.Several ingredients (talk) 05:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Stupid pig. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 10:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * 1. Let's not bring back that argument over something this trivial 2. Don't Feed The Fucking Troll 3. Whether or not 59 is a troll is up for debate. 11:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * You know what else applies? You being a grown-up and ignoring the troll rather than giving him the gratification of a debate on his talk page. Think McFly! -- 06:31, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm definitely not trying to feed the troll, I originally thought the user was some kind of unfunny editor with quirky properties. But, now that I know s/he's a troll I'll have the right impression.Several ingredients (talk) 11:01, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh come on guys. I guess if you don't know the history then idiot #59 seems offensive but he's kept his Toretts pretty much under control recently and become a useful member of the community. Offensive, that's just his way. Jack Hughes (talk) 11:20, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Did you know my name was originally FuckingVandal? --Idiot number 59 (talk) 11:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see what's inherently wrong with "FuckingVandal," but others do, apparently. I could give you FrackingVandal, but I'm a huge nerd, so that might resonate with me more than you. 08:55, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

"Fuck poser"
Why do I think you are now picturing Avril in some kind of porno? 19:29, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * As a devoted Catholic I never do such things. Avril is one of the few decent artist, whose music videos don't remind me of sex tapes. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 19:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Welcoming
Please stop saying you're chief admin or whatever when welcoming users. The welcome can be a very important thing, not to be taken as lightly as other "procedures" here. 00:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Hey
Did you died? --Idiot numbre 188 (talk) 19:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)