Forum:Censorship

is for those in 'authority' that lose the argument. --Dirk Steele (talk) 02:07, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * * who lose the argument.  Sam   Tally-ho!  02:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Are you really so sure of your grammar here? --Dirk Steele (talk) 11:04, 24 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Sigh* keep up that Martyr complex, Dirk. You're sure to convert a few terribly misinformed and vulnerably impressionable people. How does the CCHR treat you, by the way?


 * Sincerely, some BoN 08:49, 23 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I have no involvement with either scientology or the CCHR. I am an atheist with Discordian leanings and a belief in the scientific method a la Popper et alia. Why don't you just go back to perfecting your masturbatory skills and finishing your homework. After that you could maybe tidy your bedroom for once. Leave those who have a modicom of intellect to discuss stuff that obviously flies straight over your dick head. --Dirk Steele (talk) 09:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I guess that rules you out. — Unsigned, by: ORavenhurst / talk Do You Believe That? 15:25, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * In Dirk's defense, he's admitted to having Oppositional Defiant Disorder, which basically means he's 16 at the oldest.--Logic and Empricism (talk) 15:49, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes I have ODD. It is especially directed to fucktards like you. (Authors note. Dirk Steele is a fictional character. He is 62 years old, a whisky addled drunk and cannot abide pathetic teen cretinous bullshit which you have perfected to a tee.) --Dirk Steele (talk) 11:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I love how you responded to my comment by victimising yourself in the other thread. Just fuck off already. We've already seen your poxy 'evidence', and no-one follows your bullshit pseudoscience. Stop projecting and do anything else. Literally anything else will be better worth your time. Why can't you get a clue and see that you're not wanted? (I was mistaken about the CCHR, the reason you so readily defend a cult is because they're as deluded as you are) Sincerely, some BoN 06:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Are you really that stupid or just pretending? I have pointed out a 'lack' of evidence. How do I prove a lack of evidence? It is not fucking possible! Popper turns in his grave. Stop 'projecting'??? WTF? Are you Freud incarnate? The reason I 'defend' a cult is that I believe that an individual's decision to do whatever stupid things they want to do is down to them and their will. It is not my responsibility, nor of anyone else, to 'force' them to act and accord to my wishes. It is not my place to 'save' them from themselves. That is what religion is for. Which is why I think psychiatry is a secular religion and has nothing to do with science. Elron (like all capitalists) took full advantage of the Barnum effect and made up a 'religion' to stop paying tax. Well done! He took the piss out of stupid people and laughed all the way to the bank - much like glaxosmithkline. So I think he was very clever (unlike the spotty anonymous teens who rule this site..(but did not have the intellect of his mate Crowley.) --Dirk Steele (talk) 11:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * And I have no doubt you're that stupid. People have provided and pointed you towards plenty of evidence which you completely ignore as you can't see past your one-track mind. The reason you can't prove the lack of evidence is because it's fucking abundant! Popper is turning in his grave, and I think we both know why! How the fuck does psychiatry constitute religion? This site gives working definitions of the term, and none of them encompass psychiatry. The reason people abhor cults is this human emotion called 'empathy' that all but total cunts possess. See, most people dislike being exploited, and thus dislike when others are exploited. Of course, you're all but a spambot, so that must fly right over your head. Sincerely, some BoN 11:46, 24 October 2012 (UTC)