RationalWiki talk:Moderator elections/Campaigning/Archive6

Candidates' debate
Is a candidates' debate a good idea or a terrible idea? Sophie Wilder  16:34, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Its the best idea ever to come out of a Rationalwikian. MarcusCicero (talk) 16:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Have you declared, Sophie? Your name is not in bold -if you have not, then there's only seven candidates for seven spots. --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 16:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I thought I just had to sign. Sophie  Wilder  17:00, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ...that is to say, there's no point to a debate, the seven candidates will become moderators by default. --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 16:58, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * A candidates' debate? Laugh about it, shout about it, when you've got to choose. Anyway you look at it you lose. If I knew the way/I would take you home. 17:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Is there a chance I could get in by default? MarcusCicero (talk) 18:20, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yep. [[file:Nuttysig.svg|68px|link=User:Nutty Roux|Nutty Roux]]100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 18:21, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Andy's right. God DOES have a sense of humour If I knew the way/I would take you home. 18:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I can't wait until I'm in office and make all of the necessary reforms to safeguard Rationalwiki's future. I thank you for the privilege (default) of being your elected representative. MarcusCicero (talk) 18:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)