User talk:Realwoman

Yisfidri ( talk ) 13:29, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

DESPITE the mission statement stating: 1: Scientific Point of View: In line with the "not an encyclopedia" guideline, RationalWiki is not required to present "neutral" articles. RationalWiki articles should uncompromisingly explain what is bullshit, what is not, and (most importantly) why. RationalWiki does have a strong skeptically-oriented point of view; and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. The support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is as dangerous as it is wrong. Articles are created from this perspective, demonstrating the strength of science and the folly of the cranks. Similarly, articles relating to authoritarianism, logical fallacies, and wrong and broken thinking in general need to expose their flaws and dangers.

users WILL be blocked for actually stating scientific FACTS

After pointing out medically inaccurate opinions in an article, I was promptly banned for "transphobic" content. My sister was born with a rare medical condition that resulted in a lack of a pituitary gland. This means she never went through puberty. Her doctors describe her as not a "woman" but a female. Denying certain scientific facts, like the fact that the medical literature defines a woman as a human born with a uterus (not a vagina, as incorrectly asserted in the article,) and that matures through puberty is not TRANS-PHOBIC, it is current medical fact. I updated the article to replace vagina with uterus, and was promptly banned.

This site is rife with PSEUDO-SCIENCE, and is quite derogatory towards those that use the scientific method in our daily lives.
 * We here have a mission and tolerating bigotry is not part of our policy. Your shrieking may be loud, but it will not alter my ban decision.Summa Atheologica (talk) 17:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Summa Atheological - thank you for clarifying that RationalWiki has an agenda. Would you please consider adding that agenda as Mission Statement point #1, and removing the false statement regarding using "Scientific Point of View."

FYI: big·ot·ry /ˈbiɡətrē/

noun intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself. "the difficulties of combating prejudice and bigotry"

EXACTLY the behavior of yourself, as well as the entire RationalWiki community &mdash; Unsigned, by: Realwoman / talk / contribs
 * I think you're making a slight fool of yourself and have nothing useful to contribute, so I've banned you frokm orally defecating on this talk page of yours. Since nobody seems to have been able to present a case for why you shouldn't be banned, I leave you with this.Summa Atheologica (talk) 14:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)