File talk:Acinonyx jubatus Sabi Sands.jpg

Attribution/Copyright? TheoryOfPractice 17:15, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * It says on the image description. --"CURtalk 17:15, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * Stop it. We don't need these images; we don't have that much interest in cheetahs. 17:16, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * DeleteTheoryOfPractice 17:17, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * I'll delete all of the other ones but this one. --"CURtalk 17:18, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * Very well, but you may not upload any more. 17:19, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * What do you want me to upload? Anyone got a job? --"CURtalk 17:20, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * What do we need all of those old CP screenshots for? --"CURtalk 17:20, 20 February 2009 (EST)

'Cause they're on mission. This is not. Go away. TheoryOfPractice 17:21, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * But we don't need them, do we? Not most, anyway. And I plan to somehow integrate it into the article. --"CURtalk 17:22, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * 1. this isn't about CP screenshots, so don't change the subject. 2. The article needs ONE picture of a cheetah--it already has several, as I recall. 3. Go away. TheoryOfPractice 17:23, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * Has a fossil skull and an animation pic. And it very much is. You are complaining about me talking up space, when other pics take up more space and are utterly and completely useless. --"CURtalk 17:25, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * (EC)I agree. You may keep this if you delete some of the others equal or greater in size than this one. 17:25, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * I'm not complaining about you taking up space, as much as I'm complaining about you using this wiki to make up a fourth-rate version of Wild Kingdom and uploading, what, three pictures of an animal that you think you are in a single day. TheoryOfPractice 17:27, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * Stop making therianthropy into a straw man, or I will be forced to attack your beliefs. --"CURtalk 17:29, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * I wouldn't; they are all fairly rational. 17:30, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * He was awarded the Defender of Faith award on RWW. --"CURtalk 17:31, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * do you know why? TheoryOfPractice 17:34, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * Yet he is a strong atheist. 17:33, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * He appears also to enjoy poking me with a stick. What does he have against cheetahs? And if he defends Christianity, you'd think he would be more tolerant of therianthropy. --"CURtalk 17:35, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * No. Because it is stupid. TheoryOfPractice 17:37, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * (EC)He is tolerant of the sort of Christianity that uses NOMA, while you have persistently given frankly pseudoscientific explanations for therianism. 17:38, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * Come to think of it, I think that the only one able to reclaim space is Trent, as normal deletion merely removes it from public view. 17:28, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * Then we should remove them from public view just to stop this cheetahfest. Totnesmartin 17:37, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * I would like to point out that most images people upload aren't on mission- like Toast's picture of toast. --"CURtalk 17:49, 20 February 2009 (EST)

Lulz is on-mission. Cheetahs, less so. And besides, Toast doesn't have a clear agenda re: toast, as you do w/cheetahs. TheoryOfPractice 17:51, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * I do not have such a clear agenda as you might think. I will add it to the article now. --"CURtalk 17:53, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * When Toast starts arguing about how her toast-like behaviour is caused by the similarities between her brain structure or DNA and that of wheat, we might have a problem. until then, not so much...TheoryOfPractice 17:55, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * Yes, because wheat doesn't have a brain. And why on earth do you have to bring up therianthropy at every oppurtunity? I wasn't even thinking of it when I uploaded the pictures. --"CURtalk 17:57, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * (EC)Because I enjoy watching you froth at the mouth like this. Because this wiki is about making fun of fundamentally stupid beliefs. Because you're so easy to tease. It's hilarious. If you're going to go through your life arguing that your "theriotype" is a "wolf-cheetah," you should probably learn to laugh at yourself a bit--'cause everyone is going to be laughing at you anyways.
 * TOP, I am well aware you want me to go away. I won't. So if I were you (thank goodness I am not) I would attempt to prevent the wiki from ending up suffering for your enjoyment. --"CURtalk 18:05, 20 February 2009 (EST)
 * CUR, I am more than happy to let you hold whatever belief you want to, even though such belief is woefully contradicted by basic science, and pushed by a fringe, unsupported branch (sound familiar?) that is hardly worth being called a psuedoscience. You feel like a fuckin' cheetah because you want to feel like one to accommodate your own view of thw world. I am happy to sit by and watch as you insist that a patently false belief is accurate, despite basic scientific contradictions, and the hell with it, to you, it is. However, I, and I am sure most of the community, draw the line at RationalWiki becoming a holding sack for pointless images time and time again.
 * The difference between creationism and therianthropy is that people have actually beaten creationists and debates, and everybody ignores therianthropy. You don't dismiss something without giving it serious thought. Almost all of the arguments you have made I can find in your index of logical fallacies. Almost all of the arguments I have made fall under ad hocs or I don't actually believe them myself. So when you show signs that you have actually looked at this with an objective mind (which you obviously haven't) I will probably listen. Until then, we are wasting our time. --"CURtalk 18:05, 20 February 2009 (EST)