File talk:Characteristic polynomial - Conservapedia 1272837128503.png

Pardon me, but I don't see any major difference between the edits. It appears the only thing JacobB is harping about is a single space. 22:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)


 * The devil is in the detail: JacobB created this edit only to be able to oversight the previous one! So, the previous edit comments about DouglasA's reversion being incorrect has disappeared, and only the edit comment sysops are not wrong remains visible. 22:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh. So what prompted the oversighting?   22:15, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * One of the two sysops (JacobB or DouglasA) had to be wrong. And that cannot be. And therefore, it hasn't been. 22:20, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Lovely. How very Stalin-esque.   22:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I love that phrase of his. The Pope only claims infallibility when he's wearing his special infallibility hat and cape, but CP has a whole bunch (well, not many these days) of people who are infallible so long as they have ban hammers and oversight. --[[Image:Concrnedresident logo.png|140px|link=User:Concernedresident|Concernedresident|baseline]]Ask me about our beak 00:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)