Talk:Blood type diet

Criticism section?
Isn't the whole of RationalWiki supposed to be a criticism section? Totnesmartin 15:37, 24 February 2009 (EST)
 * You make a good point. Hence I have renamed it in something more fitting to our SPOV. 17:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Whee! 8 months question &rarr; response. Is this a record? 17:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * All thanks to a batshit crazy BON...-- 18:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Possibly not a record, I think I may have replied to something over a year old. 19:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Question: 25 July 2007 -> Response:  23 July 2009  19:21, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Meaningless but harmless?
This obviously won't have much of a positive effect, but it seems to me that it wouldn't exactly hurt. Am I wrong on that? --—signed by Lilfut 21:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks fairly harmless, at least in moderation and dependent on general lifestyle. -- ConcernedResident Fightin' round the world 21:59, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

What is interesting
Half the Dutch population is type O and are heavy vegetable, grain and diary eaters; the Dutch are also one of the tallest people in the world with an 105 IQ average. Clearly there diet is the correct one, and not one with heavier meat intake.

Genotype Diet
Eventually, people realized that a child could have a diferent blood type than either parent, casting doubt on the validity of blood type diets. So D'Adamo came up with a more elaborate version of the diet, based not only on blood type but also on a confluence of other arbitrary inherited signifiers such as thumbprint, height, and yDNA or mtDNA haplogroup, to create a dietary Gish Gallop effect.

D'Adamo receives bonus points for saying "epigenetics" a lot without knowing what it means.

--CogitoNotStirred (via telepathy) 19:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)