Forum:Rational defense of faith

My family's church put on an event entitled "A Rational Defense of Faith" and I found that he had some good points without appealing to faith or other usual cop outs that I'get heard before. I was hoping you might check out his video on YouTube and comment on it? His YouTube username is godlogicscience, thanks for taking the time to read this! http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iytH3nyJTss &mdash; Unsigned, by: 74.194.134.70 / talk / contribs
 * I, personally, don't do debate-by-youtube-video. Not least of all because a lot of the time, I can't actually watch them at all.  Could you re-articulate what you think the good arguments were in text?  Chances are we've got a deconstruction here already to consider.  Ikanreed (talk) 20:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The correct response to BoNs who drop YouTube links is to say: "Fuck Off". Scream!! (talk) 20:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but I'm only rude to people I know and trust, like fucking goddamn Nutty. Ikanreed (talk) 20:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * (EC)Yes. Just make your point in your own words. (Almost) nobody is going to watch your youtube video.--Coffee (talk) 20:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Aggg! to prove myself wrong I clicked the link. It's an hour long! Do you seriously think anybody is going to sit through all that just to respond to you here?--Coffee (talk) 20:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * No! It's worse that that! "Part one" in an hour long! Comments are disabled as well which sorta shows how much faith he has in his arguments.--Coffee (talk) 20:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * On the other hand, I'm not exactly concerned for the lost insight of youtube comments. Ikanreed (talk) 20:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * My new years resolution was to stop looking at them. Doing well so far. Marlow (talk) 20:58, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I have to admit that the possibility of my reading 2,000 inane yotube comments is even lower than the remote chance of my watching an hour-long regurgitation of psudo-philosophy. But I thought the fact that people aren't even given the option of disagreeing was interesting.--Coffee (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey, it's probably so unimaginably rational that you don't actually need to comment or ask questions, right? ScepticWombat (talk) 22:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * It looks like a repost of William Lane Craig's arguments and videos, which have already been debunked repeatedly. Posting it ad naseum doesn't make something any more true.  -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 21:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll admit that I immediately thought of good ole Billy "I'm a professional philosopher don't ya' know" Craig when I saw the initial post. But then, as the fossil record of RW's account of the dear professor will quickly reveal, WLC is something of a pet disgust of mine. ScepticWombat (talk) 21:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)