User talk:EvanHarper/Sandbox

Looking good so far. Any chance you could reduce the amount of redlinks? 05:02, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I dunno, Goonie. The red links listed could have some merit in mainspace.   05:04, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I know that. It was meant to spark ideas for future articles, not mean "get rid of them". But I can see how that was misconstrued.  05:06, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, that makes sense now.  05:07, 23 December 2009 (UTC)


 * This article was on Wikipedia first - it even got a DYK and thousands of hits. Then the idiots deleted it as non-notable. Hence the redlinks. EvanHarper (talk) 05:09, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I saw you originally had tons of them, but the ones you have now are fine, as they could be made into actual articles later on. 05:10, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, this article (when it becomes one) seems right up our alley. Right on, man!   05:15, 23 December 2009 (UTC)