Talk:Ghostbusters

Move to fun? Maybe? "Genius named Schlafly?" Lame. Lame. Lame. Just when it looked like a possible move-to-a-less-CP-centric-wiki might happen, along comes the clusterfuck of the Bibble project and Colbert so scuttle that. RaoulDuke 16:28, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I say we delete the page, it being thoroughly off-mission and existing only to make a jab at Mr. Schlafly, this being a particularly bad jab and not worthy of keeping. 16:31, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I concur. RaoulDuke 16:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Mind if I butt in? Why don't we just move the text to a Ghostbuster's section here? 16:41, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 'We could add the word "Ghostbusters" to that list if you'd like--the rest of the text is hardly worth keeping. RaoulDuke 16:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Ghostbusters is already on the list. I agree that the rest of the text is not worth putting there. 16:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you're probably right. There is nothing on any of the other movies on the list, so putting this there would make the article very disproportionate. 16:58, 11 October 2009 (UTC)