User talk:Human/Archive29

Re: Thanks
Alright, I'll leave them alone. C6541 (talk) 04:32, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * you mean the m-dashes? Do the --'s resolve to them?  Again, it's not a big deal.   04:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Uncle Ho
You think, maybe, we should de-sysop him and/or rake him before admin abuse or the LJ for how he's been treating ListenerX? He had his warning to cut it out after he left that death threat to LX, and it doesn't appear he learned his lesson. 22:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, bring it up at the SB though? We could call the  into session, but no one knows how, and they're so mired in bureaucratic red tape right now they can't even finish making their badges.  00:29, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Only if I can de-sysop all of you for taking the internet seriously, then redirect LX's userpage to an article on Autism.UncleHo (talk) 22:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

LJ badge thing
moved to Template talk:LJ badge 05:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Quick note for you. The blank version of the badge is up there. -- 16:19, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks! Dang, you removed the little eight-sided panel as well.  Oh well...  20:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Not offensive?
Douchebag isn't offensive? Anyway, I can feed the troll if that's what you want. -- Nx  / talk 12:10, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I suppose I just should have just saved it straight to your archive... 20:36, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks to me like you pwned him pretty well anyway. Nice work. 04:38, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

David Frum on health insurance reform and conservative failure
You might find this OpEd piece by conservative David Frum of much interest. I know I found it intriguing. 21:45, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Deja vu! Mikey's reading it right now.  02:42, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Ooops! Looks like a camera finally caught you
Taking out your aggressions on a small animal. It's just a small step from this to being a mean insulting bully to your fellow man, Huw. Oh...wait..you already do that! Never mind. --TK/MyTalk|undefinedRW User #45 08:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Not me. Perhaps you? Or your fantasy? 08:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Anyone who says the mean, disgusting things you do about others, Huw, has a problem that needs help. Where else but here do you speak the same way? Anyway not my problem. --TK/MyTalk|undefinedRW User #45 08:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you are talking about, you tiny man. No links of course come with your accusations, that is your deceitful lying style, as it always has been. Go to sleep.... or better yet, go edit CP. 08:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't have to post links, your vile personal comments to just me are proof enough of what I am talking about, despicable man. When a person cannot offer intellectual proof of disagreement, they always stoop to personal insults. --TK/MyTalk|undefinedRW User #45 21:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * When a person cannot offer intellectual proof of disagreement, they always stoop to personal insults. 20:50, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * That Terry would even go looking for such a pic, in order to bolster his inane rambling, speaks volumes about what a warped little man he is. -- Psygremlin  10:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I found a picture of another of Huw's victims. Won't somebody stop this monster?   10:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Given where he lives and how much time he spends indoors on his computer, I doubt Human's arms are quite that tanned. Though for some reason I do see him wearing butt-ugly cowboy boots  : )   11:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Even if I get lots of sun, I only turn a whiter shade of pale... 21:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Huw sends me naked pictures all the time, and he is one handsome devil. To the best of my knowledge he doesn't kill dogs. 15:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Huw, don't you know that SuperJosh is underage? Why don't you send your nudie pics to someone mature enough to handle your nakedness—like TheoryOfPractice, Gooniepunk, or Susan?   00:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Those three all all already on the listserv. Josh used a fake ID to cover, er, uncover, my ass.  02:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm of age, actually RA. 11:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You mean what we've been doing all this time was actually legal? : )   19:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Terry, that picture literally made me shudder. That you would:
 * Search for a picture like that
 * Post it up here
 * Accusing someone on here of being the perp (and if was a 'joke', then that probably even worse)
 * shows just what a disgusting, despicable, despisable, complete and utter cunt you really are.  15:44, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * So the guy that told us how lucky we are to not be under British libel laws because we called him names calls Human an animal abuser. I'd hate to see your Google image search history, TK.  Corry (talk) 02:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Red Exclamation Marks
I try to look at the red exclamation marks & the edit for the New World Encyclopedia wasn't instantaneously understandable. As thinking hurts and it was made by a BoN, I asked for an explanation & reverted it (I felt the Power)... 21:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I went through them all and then went to the last one and hit "rollback". In the meantime you had undone only the last edit, so I went back to the pre-BoN version and saved that.  One edit BoN made was to insert weird argumentative language into the middle of an obviously quoted section.  Which I am now hunting for the source of (http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Info:Project_Vision), which no longer (did it ever?) matches what we have.  21:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * through them all? Kudos! Great, thanks... 21:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * There were only 5 or 6, I think, from this one BoN. 00:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

An echo of lost ages
So I see your still floating around. Anyone else from the old days still on here? 04:55, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ice still turns up, and Kels and Susan are still active. Who from the cabal, though?  Trent during school breaks, surely at least a couple others?  Yeah, Sid is still active. Doc pops in once in a while, but is busy with life and his blog.  I'll think of two more as soon as I hit "save", I'm sure! So how have you been and to what do we owe the honor of your visit?  04:59, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I was talking with Ice a while back about CP/RW and just all of a sudden thought of it tonight and felt like getting on. I've been pretty good, though my presence on the internet has decreased significantly. What about you? 05:02, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool. I wondered why the internet was so dran the last couple years!  I survived 2009 ;).  Still enjoying this place, not sure how much it has changed or stayed the same since the old days since I've been here all along.  Be interesting to see what you think if you stick around a bit.   05:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Uhhhh. Susan isn't exactly active. -- 21:39, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Good point, I'd forgotten her recent LaNCB. 21:41, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * She hasn't been here for a week or two, maybe she actually meant it... 21:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks like she's just socking again. 14:19, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Look around you....
Did you get what we're looking for? Correct! Music. 03:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * They skipped "30 END". The BASIC I used to use (still have manual!) would not run without an END statement.  Isn't this the crazy science parody show I see once in a while on PBS?  03:31, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure is. I worship that show.  And the school board meetings I catch once in a while.  Ran into the chair at the dump swappe shoppe, recognized her, told her she was my favorite TV show...  03:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Glad you enjoyed it, then. 03:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I've actually seen this one.  I love the fake science/technology, reminds me of irony meter. Or inspired it, not sure which.  03:38, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

One simple word needed
Thanks, I suspected it would be something like that, but I wasn't sure and I've never seen "manner" used like that. -- Nx  / talk 09:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Sometimes languages - even ones we think we know - can be very complicated.  And then simple when one sees what's missing. Thanks for the friendly :)  09:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Jw xP
What did you find unsubstantial concerning my edits? :P (I don't really wondering, just out of curiosity.) &mdash; Unsigned, by: Beyonddeities / talk / contribs
 * If I reverted them/rolled them back, there could be many reasons. Check my edit comment if there was one.  If you are curious as to a specific edit/undo, pop the difflink up here and I'll explain further, if you wish.  Also, please sign your comments as told on your talk page.  10:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

TK
You must have pissed him off again, and the one with the fragile ego is lashing out the only way he knows how... deleting stuff on CP. Still, at least it looks like Terrykins dreamed up your very own deletion reason. -- PsyGremlin  11:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Aw, it finally occurred to the Troll Knave to delete my sub-pages! I've been chuckling at them still existing for years.  20:52, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Rejoice!
Rejoice despite the fact this world will hurt you. 06:55, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Nice guitars! Although I do have  a problem with singers who don't understand the concept of "key".  Call me old fashioned.  NOW GET OFF MY LAWN!  hehe  07:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Category:Known liars please do not delete talk page comments, you piece of excrement
Okay, fine by me, Huw. --TK/MyTalk|undefinedRW User #45 10:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

LJ & RS
Would Loya Jirga consider temporarily blocking RobSmith about the WP stuff? This is getting out of hand. Šţěŗĭļė 17:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Loya Jirga retired. It sure was useful while it lasted, but all good things must come to an end.  Anyway, I've been thinking along similar lines, if these shenanigans continue, but there should be a stern warning on his user page first.   17:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Cripes, I'm a member and nobody even had the decency to drop a note on my talk page about it. Probably would have been nice to know. And yes, I support blocking Rob for a day over this. Or at the very least, binning for a day. --Kels (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * LJ is finished? Shum mistake?--BobSpring is sprung! 18:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably not finished, although not really started either. Given that the retirement template went up within a minute of this & this one, it looks like part of Susan's L&NCB thing, although it's supposed to be a shared account.  My comment above was not entirely serious, but I think there's a lot of uncertainty about what the LJ is there for, when it's supposed to kick in & how it's supposed to work.   23:14, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * FTR I have removed the retired template. 23:19, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

2 Questions....
Has the LJ been retired? I am aware nothing happened with it but it served a good purpose at the time - the whole process brough the site back together again. Secondly, someone wanna give me a brief on this RobSmith/WP thing? Whats happened? Acei9 23:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Q1 - No. Susan put up a retired template unilaterally. To retire the Loya Jirga we would need to invent the Grand Tribunal, who are more powerful still. All will quail before their judgement. 23:31, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Q2, best places to start would be Sid and Trent's talk pages, and the wp:talk:conservapedia. 23:35, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Q2. The short version is Rob figured that he had something he could hold over RW, so he started bitching on WP about who founded RW and insisting it be changed to PalMD being the sole founder. He immediately took it to as many boards as he could, and was uniformly told he was full of shit.  Now he's trying to get it changed back to the version with mistakes in it then deleted, apparently to get rid of the history, then have mention of RW removed from the CP article over there.  All the while leaving cryptic threats of dragging all and sundry before ARBCOM and whatever other board he can get his hands on.  He's way less lucid through this than he usually is, and that's saying something.  If I got something wrong, I'm sure someone will correct me. --Kels (talk) 23:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought this discussion came out of the argument that random guy started about RW editors conducting "warfare" at WP. Now I'm even more confused. 23:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This thing with Rob flared up right right after that thing fizzled out. I wouldn't be surprised if they're in cahoots.   23:56, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I might have missed something at the start, but where it stands currently is Rob threatening people and having a hard-on for keeping discussions off WP and getting the RW article over there deleted rather than kept or made a redirect. --Kels (talk) 23:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sid & Trent want it deleted and redirected, too. This is the start of agreement between users in dispute. Please do not mischaracterize the situation, Kels. nobsdon't bother me 02:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Standard Rob practice then. Acei9 23:57, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you Kels & Weasel & Ace! ^_______^ 00:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Why didn't Rob start the whole discussion on User talk:PalMD - isn't he the founder of RationalWiki, according to Rob's sources? 03:58, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

LJ and process etc.
Random factoids:
 * The user "LJ" never became the "shared account" it was intended to be.
 * When Susan left and never coming backed, she explicitly said she'd return if the was called into session.
 * We have no idea how to call the into session, how or where.
 * I suggest we use RobS' insanity as a "test case", to experiment with process.

Here is what I propose. We use the forum for "cases". Each case becomes a new subforum. Whoever opens a case should 1. be directly affected by whatever they are complaining about and 2. use the "email this user" feature to inform each of The Seven of the new case 3. make sure they present their complaint clearly with good difflinks to evidences.

You guys want to give it a try? 23:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I can't guarantee I'd be able to fully engage, since I'm in finals for the next month or so, but otherwise no arguments. --Kels (talk) 23:35, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The minimum requirement for any LJ member would be to pop in and say they're too busy and to carry on without them.  23:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Works for me however as a LJ I'd have to abstain from a vote as I was on holiday during the period in question. Acei9 23:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Dang, don't ban me; I'd loose my COI in editing wp:RationalWiki (could look petty and be a tragedy if the RW entry at WP survives and boatload of RW editors get banned by WP:Arbcom). Jeezusshhhh........  nobsdon't bother me 23:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I would put a comment here, but I know that RobS will be revising his comment incessantly and would only EC me. Which is why I am not commenting here. 23:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You're already petty and dishonest, Rob. I'm sure Arbcom would laugh in your face based on the history of all this.  We got to that stage first, mind you. --Kels (talk) 23:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

So what we see here is that anyone who disagrees or challenges a few members of the original "cabal" are petty, dishonest liars, and in some cases drug abusers. Do you ever consider what such repeated comments to the few who disagree with you guys looks like to the few outsiders looking? Maybe it is time for RW 4.0 and another wiping of the record? --TK/MyTalk|undefinedRW User #45 00:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Is there something you want, troll? Otherwise, go back to smearing feces over your own page. --Kels (talk) 00:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * One would think lesbians get enough hate from this world, Kelsi, so you wouldn't be so filled with it for others. Has that hatred caused your heart to dry up and wither away? I still love you.   --TK/MyTalk|undefinedRW User #45 00:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * "drug abusers"??? wtf?  00:17, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * EC The World hates Kels? O____o I refuse to believe that. Mei still loves Kels. 00:17, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about me, I'm just peachy. TK lies as easily as he breathes, it's part of the whole sociopath parcel. --Kels (talk) 00:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Pedophile
You do realise that a pedophile would be someone who fucking loves feet? Just because you yanks can't spell doesn't mean you should bastardise (yes, with an s) Latin as well as English. Now sort yourself out before I come over there and give you a right royal spanking until your bottom (not fanny) turns purple. 09:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Could also be someone who loves fucking feet. N'est-ce pas? Now see what trouble your Britlishness has got you into!  09:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ooh, kinky. Pics? 09:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Not my kink. I recommend thehun.com  09:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps not when I'm at work... 09:51, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably not, no. Not gud Idya.  09:55, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Wouldn't a foot lover be a podophile, as per "podiatrist"? --Kels (talk) 11:24, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Not in latin, but apparently pedo- is the greek suffix for child or children, so the american use of pedophile could be justified as a mix of greek and latin terms. 11:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Interesting:

Remember that the Greek ped- means "child" while the Latin ped- means "foot". Don't confuse this Greek element with another Greek pedo- which means "ground, soil, earth".
 * 1 So it really should be "pedphile" 11:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * So where does "podiatrist" come from? --Kels (talk) 11:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Greek. Pod- is the Greek prefix for foot. 12:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Skype
Why you no answer me on teh skype? I thought you loved me, and we could braid each other's hair and then get married and get a dog. 21:55, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

You have a great idea about NSFW images, but nobody seems to ask you.
So, in regards to the question of NSFW images, what ideas do you have? I'm asking you. P-Foster (talk) 21:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Neber mind, I found that section in the bar. Good idea. P-Foster (talk) 21:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

w
I like when you suddenly appear in the salon and say things I don't understand. 06:02, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Me too ;) 03:54, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Mormonism fake?
why did you say that? i am a Mormon and our church aint fake. you may hate it (i dont care if you hate it) but dont call it fake....... if Mormonism is fake then all religion are fake too.Waronstupidity (talk) 11:42, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

why are you ignoring me
you didn't respond to my previous message.... if Mormonism is fake then so is every-other religion....... what do you have agains't it ? why dont you call the other religion fake too ? Waronstupidity (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I do. Any system based on supernatural assumptions is not founded in reality, but in imagination.  01:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Did you break Waron's Wiki, Human? 03:17, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

what the fuck.....
what is your fucking problem, leave my user page alone.Waronstupidity (talk) 07:27, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * OMG I broke your wiki! So sorry.   07:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * shut upWaronstupidity (talk) 07:35, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, I fixed it and explained to Human why it was uncool, and he agreed. Let's leave it at that and avoid an unnecessary HCM. Cheers to both of you. 07:39, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * thanks but i dont know what she have agains't me. Waronstupidity (talk) 07:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

your starting to piss me off
stop acting like a brat and stating your goddamn OPINION AS A FACT and leave my goddamn user page alone.I may be the first to tell you but your not a fucking queen and your opinion isn't accepted by everyone. you seem to have chosen me as your target for no fucking reason so back the fuck up and stop being a bigot because yes that word work for atheist too your the atheist version of andy...Waronstupidity (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I'll try......
wish me luck Waronstupidity (talk) 09:06, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You're doing better all the time. 09:16, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * im sure your sarcastic. Waronstupidity (talk) 09:16, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Why? I post in good faith, after all.  09:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * people think im dumb(only on the internet though) and normally underestimate me(again only on the internet) so im used to sarcasm and know when to spot it .Waronstupidity (talk) 09:21, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I wonder why? 09:35, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * see... seriously human your an asshole.Waronstupidity (talk) 09:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You realize you aren't exactly making friends and influencing people here lately, right? 09:39, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * note that i wasn't the first insulting right? so if i'm losing friend because i respond to personal attack so so be it.Waronstupidity (talk) 09:44, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * the only thing you did lately is undermining me you may have did LOT of thing befor but now you lowered yourself to insult people for no fucking reason Waronstupidity (talk) 09:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Authenticating my email
I can't get the authentication message that is supposed to get sent to verify my email address, so my email preferences are not working. I have hit the button to send a message manually on 3 occasions, with no luck. The process worked on my Wikiversity account. Could you please look into this? My email is sam4557@gmail.com. SamHB (talk) 06:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I can't do anything fancy behind the scenes, although user:nx might be able to. I'm surprised your email auth isn't working, I've done five or six times here with no hitch. Are you dead certain you are typing your email addy in correctly?  06:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Human i got an honest question for ya.
I understand that you don't very like Mormon but can you give me an honest reason why you feel the need to blast em? the main part of the Church (not those pro polygamy)have a better attitude then most Christian, i never saw any Mormon blast someone telling him hes going to hell for not following the book of Mormon, Mormon doctrine are strictly agains't forced conversion (if you forget about converting the dead (they are already dead....so it doesn't really affect them). I'm just trying to understand you, you want to look like a rational guy (sure you are) but your global attitude is a bit over zealous...note that im not trying to restart our earlier *incident* i just want to know why there so much hate toward them.Waronstupidity (talk) 00:10, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * To address your questions/comments in reverse order, whatever happened yesterday happened yesterday (what goes on in Vegas stays in Vegas), and pibot will archive it in a few days. Keep in mind the thing in the CS that says (due to observation) that tow users can be busy having a bitter argument in one place while happily sharing a freshly roasted goat in another.  Next, I'm not against polygamy/polyandry, I think any people who want to form a family should be allowed to, and be recognized as such legally (tax codes, health issues, "divorce" processes, etc.).  As far as any given religion, basically, although I know that some/many religions promote "good behavior", I find the supernatural aspects of how they do it to be a little hard to swallow.  One can pursue good behavior without worshiping or fearing an imaginary friend(s). At the root level, I consider all religions to be "fake" because they base their fundamental precepts on fictional constructs.  01:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


 * i removed you from my thing i hate list it was quite immature of me. but i was quite pissed at you yesterday.Waronstupidity (talk) 01:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No blood, no foul, as they say. You have always been entitled to your opinion, and to express it on your user page (OK, "general" hate is frowned upon, but this wasn't general, it was specific).  Are we now kissing and making up?  01:51, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * well.... we could /hug each other in a manly way but that all! i aint gay!Waronstupidity (talk) 01:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * That would be fine. 01:57, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Baseball
So, I turn on the tv and what do I see? My team beating your team! *grins evilly* 01:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * My team is the Brooklyn Dodgers. Which is yours? PS, I think we made a "sports" forum so as not to anger Susan ;) if you want to chat about it there.  01:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Mine is the Yanks. I could have sworn yours is the Sox, but I guess not. Don't you live in NH? That must be sacrilege to the people up there.
 * Also, we have a sports forum? I had no idea. 01:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I think we do. Or we should anyway. Haven't liked the White Sox since the scandal....  02:09, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

that was on purpose
Crappy yes, but bad spelling, not this time. --129.19.137.241 (talk) 06:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * On purpose, sure, but incoherent? Perhaps.  "Moar" is understandable as a meme.  "Hitlar" isn't really. Anyway, it was a boring wigo, should have stuck to the talk page. IMO.  07:00, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Hold the phone!!!!
" too bad they can't write for shite sorry that was rude" Hey now, you try fixing what was, originally, a word salad at best and coming out with something resembling English! Just try! 06:39, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, yeah, look at the history of magdalene laundry if you want sympathy ;) 06:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Just following in your footsteps cleaning up the mess, is all. 06:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay. So long as it wasn't a swipe at me. 06:42, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Wasn't it obvious that by "they" I meant the Ghey Cabal? Hence my "sorry that was rude" for stereotyping "them" in any fashion? If it wasn't, sorry.  I was just helping you mop the floor, not accusing you of puking on it.  06:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

What you don't get
I'm not entirely clear on what you don't understand, could you please explain? The basic idea is supposed to be that the fun page I want to make will consist of a number of "tips," along with examples (both from fiction, and for real-world conspiracy theories) of conspiracies that followed or failed to follow these tips. For example, one tip is not to leave signs of your conspiracy everywhere when you don't have anything to gain from it. The Masons fail on this point, since they put coded symbols on all our money for no discernible reason.--Mustex (talk) 10:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks, I think I finally get it.  02:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

15^2
Nice to see you there. yours laterally82.23.208.15 (talk) 21:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Edumacation
So I herd you liekd the old Deresiewicz article I pointed to. I have a few more oldish articles on the State of the Academy (the US Academy, mostly) and I thought one or two the following might interest you:


 * Love on Campus
 * In the Basement of the Ivory Tower
 * The '60s Begin to Fade as Liberal Professors Retire
 * Who Needs Harvard?

Please to enjoy. mb 04:05, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Regarding the first article, maybe Educating Rita would be a good early example.  Also, that Oleanna film, I own it, it's agonizing to watch.  As the tag line says, "whatever you think, you're wrong".  06:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I don't know Educating Rita and I haven't seen any of the films the article mentions either. Any of them worth watching? mb 13:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

ww
Human human human. What are you listening to or eating? 00:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * "Says You" on WGBH radio. And I'm eating a beer.  Well, an ale, to be exact.  00:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * What is 'Says You'? 00:54, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * http://www.saysyou.net/ it's a word game show. 00:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Is it fun? I am listening to music from 1997 and eating bacon & bread. 01:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's witty and mildly informative. I am now eating Scotch and a cigarette.  Bacon and bread sounds tasty.  I like bacon and I like bread.  I also like Eggo waffles with butter and maple syrup.  Have 'GBH playing jazz in the background, about to start another cryptic puzzle (or one I haven't been able to do much of).  Oh!  That reminds me, puzzlecrypt's new (monthlyu) puzzle will be posted now!  Time to go print it!  02:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Human human human! I don't really know what 'cryptic puzzles' are. Is there a special sort or are they just puzzles? Bacon and bread is very nice, and easy to make. You just fry bacon and put it in bread. It is basically genius. I'm not allowed to make waffles, because of mayhem. 05:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Cryptic puzzles are a bit like "regular" crossword puzzles, except that 1) there are a lot fewer crossing words in most cases, and, most importantly, 2) the clues are insane. For instance, to use Frank's explanation, "ground rules" = "lures".  Get it?  Grind up "rules" and you get "lures".  Wikipedia has a great article on them, and I have a fistfull of links to them at this dump.  Personally, I don't mind the expense of pre-cooked bacon, since cooking it is so messy - I once heard you are supposed to cook it nekkid, since the splattering fat (too hot) will be obvious.  10 seconds per slice on high, yummy bacon.  Of course I get robbed of the grease, which could be used to make the most awesome food in existence, "fried bread". Sorry waffles make mayhem.  Toaster waffles are actually fairly safe.  06:02, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought crossword clues were always insane. I don't find cooking bacon so messy, but I would not want to do it naked because it would sting. I agree with the fried bread principle. Toaster waffles sound exotic. 06:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I have kissed a handful of boys, and it never stung, but toasted waffles are extremely feng shui.  Done right, anyway.  06:22, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You lost me with the kissing and feng shui parts. (Boys probably don't sting you unless you ask specially) 08:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * But if boys don't sting, where do the bees in "the birds and the bees" come in?  11:16, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

lets me get this straight
you say your female on your user page but people refer to you as *he* so tell me re you female or male?O_O Waronstupidity (talk) 15:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The straight dope. 22:59, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Better twisted clarity. 05:34, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * O_O no but seriously :-) ?Waronstupidity (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, the Ladies Club. Ah yes, I remember that.  Good times.  I'll have to dig up the records sometime or other...  -- 02:01, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Also known as "The Night RationalWiki Went Into Full Drag Mode"? 02:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Request for comment
Would this be a good replacement and de-CP-fy of this? 05:49, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, it's better than anything I've ever written :) Go ahead and mainspaceify it -- Nx  / talk 10:43, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree, it looks good. Could use a little copyediting, but that's no big deal.  Will we be leaving the CP: version as it is?  00:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Most of the content is from the CP version (from the use by creationists to what else may zero probability may mean is directly from the article with almost no modifications).  07:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * So move it to mainspace and we will make it even better. 08:01, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Human human
What is happening right now? I hope you are eating something nice. 08:47, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I had a cheezeburger a little while ago, it was tasty. I also had some tasty buttery mapley waffles.  Now I am randomly utubing Roxy Music and QI.  How is Mei this fine morning or evening?  09:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have had soup so far. I am youtubing The Office for random reasons, and I am quite alright except for suddenly being a whole year older. 09:40, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Does that mean happy birfdaze are in order? In which case, it was special soup!  09:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yesterday was my birthday. Did you miss the cake? It was a pretty big cake. Nx made it. This soup was actually just chicken soup. 09:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This is a gift . 09:49, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I think I had some cake, today. A donuty cruller thing at Carworks.  Courtesy of Mei. Why is pretty music playing? Ooh, nice!  Thank you for your, um, birthday gift?  10:20, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You are welcome. For my birthday I don't usually give everyone gifts, but it sounds like it might be nice so I will consider doing that more often. 10:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a very interesting tradition you have started, wherein now, the birthday boy, girl, or goat, now gives gifts, or at least some cake or chocolate, to all their friends. I have 8 months during which to ponder this new tradition before having to honor it.  10:33, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I give people bits of my cake anyway. People are always eating my cake. Also, this tradition also applies to mapley waffles. 10:42, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Mmmm, eating cake is a special pleasure indeed. So are mapley waffles, which I will surely endeavor to share when it is my turn, as indicated by the orbital thingie of our rock about our furnace.  10:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

You allowed this website to become a fascist pit of ignominy.
You deserve nothing but the contempt of this community for allowing this website to be run by jackals like Nx. For shame. &mdash; Unsigned, by: 86.40.210.123 / talk / contribs 10:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't "allow" it, I "forced" it, enforced it, and reinforced it you moron. I also prefabricated it and made a jigsaw out if it. I sold a meccano version, made in China, on the black market, and encouraged adolescents to smoke it. I then took copies of it and made hookers tattoo it onto their asses and charge extra for their services.  What have you done for RW lately?  10:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * MC - 'ignominy' would imply that at least 2 people consider us fascistic, or whatever your vague complaint is. Sadly you have fallen at this hurdle. 10:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought I was funnier than the troll, please acknowledge my attempt at funniness, even though I missed the cake (but ate the cruller, wow, sugar rush). 10:35, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I did think you were funny! I lolled at  'I "forced" it, enforced it, and reinforced it you moron. I also prefabricated it and made a jigsaw out if it.'  I don't think MC really pays attention to who he's accusing of this stuff. 10:40, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The little fucker has, to date, left me alone. Probably for good reason.  If I brought the combined armies of Goonie's squad, Josh's farts, and Mei's usefulness to bear upon him, he would surely regret the escape from his mother's womb 12 years past.  10:48, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * MC's a little prick who's life is so pathetic he has nothing better to do than sit around trolling us. Or, he's a sock of a well established user who needs an outlet of some kind. 10:51, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably both. 10:56, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You people make me sick and remind me of the henchmen of the third reich. 86.40.210.123 (talk) 13:33, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I should also add that I think your worse than Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, and all the fascistic dictators of history combined. For shame. 86.40.210.123 (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Leave Human alone. She's hot! -- 14:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Human and Nx aint fascist, Mei is ( :-) kidding)Waronstupidity (talk) 20:35, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

www
A hilarious edit  20:15, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

wwwww
Human human! Hello, how are things. 04:44, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Mei, waffles all around, and fun. 06:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Right now I am adrift in time and space. 17:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm laughing at TK and his surrogate, nobs01, on WP. I can't believe TK thinks he can take on 100,000 sysops and get them to get us to not say his name is  here.  04:04, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I am still adrift, and seem to be moving further away from where you are time-wise. I have not paid much attention to the WP thing because I do not understand what anyone involved in it is saying. It is all very confusing. 03:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with Mei on this one. There's been soooooo much WikiLawyering and edit-warring going on that it is hard to tell what is going these days with those trolls from the CONservative vandal site.  03:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

hello
Thanks human! Lacrimosus (talk) 08:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, you are quite welcome! Thank you for joining.  08:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Sure, sorry! I know this isn't WP, but it might take some getting used to :) Lacrimosus (talk) 09:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Try to avoid ping pong conversations if you can. Part of the difficulty is you are editing an article that has multiple identical section names.  Which I'd like to fix now, but we might EC a lot if I try.  09:16, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Sleep
Sleep - have you given up on it?--BobSpring is sprung! 10:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. 10:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah. In that case I shall sleep some more tonight in order to ensure that the average amount of sleep in the world is not reduced.--BobSpring is sprung! 10:43, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Better have some for me as well, Bob. My biological clock is still screwed with the jet-lag from a 7 hour time diff. I've been told it's better going west but I've no idea when that's likely to happen. 10:48, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. Maybe you can have some for me later?--BobSpring is sprung! 11:00, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sleep is for the week. RationalWiki is for the weekend - David Gerard (talk) 11:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Printing their crossword sucks.
(don't things archive quickly on Saloon Bar - took me ages to find that comment [BTW a fortnight is two * a sennight]) Try downloading this (available as Xword on Ubuntu) 19:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmmm, it didn't occur to me to use across lite to get an easy print version. Installed, dang, it seems like it will force me to use IE?  Must look into this further... thanks!  PS, I know what a fortnight is, I just don't know a simple way to remember to check for the new puzzle every couple weeks.  23:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Seems to have worked fine without waking IE up. Thanks again!  23:28, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm on Chrome: no worries there. How it force you to use ie? I'll mark issues on mu user page (I get it Wednesday - subscriber's perks) 23:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I was only concerned because when it was done installing it said it was all set to work on IE. But all you do is d/l the file and open it in x-lite anyway.  Worked perfectly and printed very nicely, thanks.  That would be awesome if you mark the fortnights on your user page!  Nothing in my life is fortnightly, so I have nothing to sync to.  If I was UKian I guess I'd see the new on on the newstand and that would cue me, but here I got nothing. Thanks!  01:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

wwwwww
'Personally I prefer omelettes or over-easy eggs on toast.'

Human gets it. Mei (talk) 01:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yummy. I almost uploaded an ommy piccy the other day.  I know I've taken pictures of eggs on toast before nomming them all up. Sides of baked beans and/or corned beef hash.   02:06, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The problem with picture taking is that you have to eat the food as soon as possible. Mei (talk) 02:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * True dat. One has to realize while cooking that a special visual treat is being formed and have the camera at the ready to minimize the delay before nomming spent clicking.  02:16, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

What do you call the lights? You don't know?
I do; bulbs! 06:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Drunk utubing is awesome. I cut my finger on an ice "cube".  06:07, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

U R TEH GHEY
I called you. You didn't answer. Motherfucker. Nutty Roux (talk) 02:41, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * When? 02:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * But I was thinking of you, does that count? May I please have a pack of Parliaments?  02:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I think I called you yesterday and earlier this evening but I'm too drunk to remember. Nutty Roux (talk) 03:52, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Nuttin' on the caller ID. Maybe you called your lifeline?  Glad to hear about the inebriation, you were too dry for too long!  04:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Counting colons
You can copypaste the colons from the previous post instead of counting the colons yourself (although it only works up to 20 - we can add more if needed). -- Nx  / talk 09:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sweet! 14:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Reminder as promised.
Private Eye issue 1261 xword due online tomorrow. 06:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh thank you darling! So sweet.  I am as addicted to my Britxwords as to alcohol, if not more.  Although they are incompatible. :(  07:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speaking of which, on 1260 I am mostly done, but utterly stumped on about five clues, especially the multi word cyclops one (27a etc.) Any hints? 07:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay - been out all day. Re the multi-worder: How many optical organs had Cyclops? What do we over here call pants? & anag ken. And the whole is a "member". 17:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Damn, I forgot to translate into British! Thanks... and I had one-eyed already.  18:37, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Per senior administrators' discussion
I've started an article over here. Feel free to jump in and make it revolve less around my initial rumination on the subject. I'd rather make it a community-based, impersonal article than one attributed solely to myself. 03:03, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Preserving old pictures
"...took with an Instamatic from the QE2 in July 1969. On top of being poor quality, the print has been disintegrating. —" Pardon me for suggesting the obvious, but do you have a scanner? You could digitalize all your aging prints that way. 05:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No kidding. But if the print is falling apart and of shitty resolution, the scanner is not a magic fix.   07:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yah, but it's better than letting an old memento disintegrate.  15:40, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, ideally what I'd do is ask if my mother still has the negatives (it was her camera back then) and if she does, have a new print made. And then photoshop a big green penis onto the statue.  23:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You have a mother?  00:09, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * And a big green penis, yes. 00:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Space as sort key
Why not? It's an elegant way of putting the main article in a category at the front, instead of being buried somewhere in the middle of the list. -- Nx  / talk 04:16, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * But why not simply write text with a link before the listing? 04:17, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You can do that too, nothing's stopping you. It just looks silly to have the main article buried somewhere in the list, regardless of the link in the category description -- Nx  / talk 04:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * But what the main article is might vary over time. For instance, Constitution wasn't even in cat:constitution!  So I can see why RA thought US Const was the main article.  Merkin blinders and all stopped him from seeing beyond that.  It is better, I think, to write "portal" like intros to categories if we can, linking to the most important articles.  04:22, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * So what if it changes? We just change the sort key (although in the case of new age, I don't see how the main article of that category could be anything else). You can write a portal-like intro, the two options are not exclusive. -- Nx  / talk 04:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * True, but once the intro is there, it doesn't matter if the "main article" is simply alphabetized, does it? 04:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

email
(I am a person not a template) 05:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, that was weird. 05:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, Trent wrote me back just before I got yours. 05:11, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * ? TerrySmall.png (I am a person not a template) 05:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Got your mail just after his. Replied. I think.  05:21, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

If you want me to explain it, i'll explain it
Half of your "crap" is true. Honestly go google mammalian diving reflex. Half of it I got from Wikipedia. rational ghey (send a message) 08:28, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Trouble is, it's also not a very good article. Old earth is already covered thoroughly elsewhere.  It also lack citations (or did) for many of its claims.  19:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Are you deliberately trying to drive away everyone from this wiki? -- Nx  / talk 19:53, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * For pointing out the low quality of an article, which others appear to agree with me about? Come on, don't be so hysterical... 20:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No, for pointing it out in such a rude way. -- Nx  / talk 20:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No one denies that Human is RW's TK (by which I mean Terry Koeckritz). &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)


 * LOVE. LOVE IS ALL AROUND. I've put a note on the article that anyone wanting to add new examples needs a reference ... which means the old ones do too (that means get to it, RationalGhey) - David Gerard (talk) 20:53, 3 May 2010 (UTC)


 * LOL!!! Are the little internet geeks having a little falling out??? How cute. JustCurious (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up on the Aliensdidit show
It's tons of fun! This shit makes teh Assfly's YEC look more credible! 05:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, as you know, I'm pretty much liveblogging it on here. 05:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh gawd, this show has been waaaaaay to much fun for one night! I can't wait till the next episode! 05:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * What's weird is although it's billed as a "series", this is the same show I liveblogged when I was hacking up the History Channel article over it. But their site bills it as a series, I guess?  05:41, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Limp Jerky voting
Ello there. You voted in the famous Lumpy Jerboa bi-election, but there's some confusion as to who voted and who just commented. If you only intended to comment, can you modify your post on the RationalWiki:May 2010 Loya Jirga by-elections by adding a strikethrough tag to it? e.g.

My earlier comment

You can leave your post as is if you were actually voting.

ConcernedResident bat for the ladies 09:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Lucho
Have actually ever read that moron's "Moon Landing Hoax" essay over at WikiSynergy? 95% of the sources that dolt cites as "skeptics" on the topic are old communist bloc researchers who are like "In Soviet Russia, moon lands on you!" Fucking retarded. 12:59, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I've skimmed it a bit, which is all I can take. He rivals Ken for his obsessiveness and stupidity.  00:20, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I can't say I disagree with you there. I will give you the heads up, though, that I'm about to cause the sparks to fly over there, as I've looked through most of his bullet-pointed crap at the bottom, and found he only cherry-picked the weakest of "NASA defenses" as answers to his pseudoskepicism on the moonlanding. Meanwhile, I've done plenty of research on much better, more concrete answers, and will use that combined with some good 'ol engineering know how to debunk 90% of his nonsense. 01:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Create separate article and crosslink them to play nice. 02:03, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe. I'm gonna start on the talkpage first. Just to test the waters. Last thing I need is another green goose incident. Not that I care about WikiSynergy, but I just don't like Woo-meisters spamming my e-mail with death threats. 02:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you'd be safe going straight to creating a moon hoax debunking page. It's what WS wants to be.  I doubt Lucho is insane like GG.  Just in a different way ;)  02:08, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Prom
Shouldn't you have put that crat promotion via the salon bar?--BobSpring is sprung! 18:11, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It is apparent that Human thinks that the word "community consensus" means his opinion. 18:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sorry about that, I'd been meaning to do it for a while and forgot this "discussion" phase you speak of. 21:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

thanks
thanks for correcting my text in the mercenaries article. I hope it is somewhat readable. Gmb (talk) 22:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You're quite welcome. It was nice of you to leave a warning on the talk page that your edit needed proofreading.  01:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

PapaNovember on Talk:CONservapedia
Poor guy has finally thrown in the towel "I'm so terribly bored of this". 18:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hehe. Poor guy indeed, having to try to follow Rob's "reasoning". 20:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * So is anyone going to actually follow through on his suggestions? Because you know otherwise Rob is just going to continue until he either gets his way or is topic banned. --Kels (talk) 21:14, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Why not just ignore him? Unless he starts adding untrue or unsourced statements to the article, don't give him the time of day. Keegscee (talk) 21:28, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Likely the best approach (and mostly followed by people if you ignore some snark, and we can work on cutting that back, too). I simply don't see any content dispute we could resolve since Rob is just repeating his little lies ("LA Times says that Lipson is the founder of RW!" for example) over and over again while at the same time hoping to pick up candid remarks he can twist for his own purposes. I can understand Papa November being wary, but that doesn't mean that he's 100% right in his recommendations. Rob is trolling too much (and offering too little in the Solid Argument department) for regular dispute resolution, but isn't (apparently) trolling enough to get his ass handed to him by an admin - which I find quite surprising and disappointing. Can you really get away with almost two months of talk page trolling with not even an official warning? --Sid (talk) 21:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * PapaNovember is quite correct that at this stage, ignoring or dispute resolution is the way to go. Except for the bit where he pressured the slandered to shut up. If people from RationalWiki feel they are being slandered and have been threatened by a Wikipedia admin not to fuss about it, going to the Foundation is the next step - David Gerard (talk) 21:48, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Since you asked
(moved to article talk page) 04:28, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

singularity
Trus me - is factual - all physics breaks down at the singularity because the singualrity, like the primoridal atom of the early big bang theory, contains the laws and dimensions. Though it should be noted that this is disfavoured under modern Inflation/Big Bang theory. After being banned from aSK for trying to educate PJR on Inflation Theory I have been doing a shitload of catch-up reading on modern cosmology/astrophysics in order to educate him when my block ends......which will of course end up in another block. Acei9 07:54, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, mostly I was trying to copyedit, sorry if I was mucking up the physics trying to make the Britlish sparkle. I still don't like the idea of "all the laws" though, that seems awkward even from a physics point of view. 09:57, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The idea that the universe started as a singularity is now fairly old hat. It harks backs as early as pre-big bang (though progenitor to the big bang) idea of a "primordial atom". The singularity was an idea to describe the pre-bang state. An "atom" (or state if you will) wherein all laws and dimensions were intertwined, to be released as a "big bang". Inflation theory does away with this ideal so the singularity has fallen out of favour as a big bang beginning point. However, as with inflation and with the singularity, the laws of physics are always thought to have existed (in this universe - however defined). Indeed, they are the watchmaker. A blind one notwithstanding. Acei9 10:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. When I read "all laws of physics" it strikes me that it might mean "all possible laws of physics".  So I changed it to all the laws... I still think the writing needs work, but it is hard to write about the theoretical unknown in a simple manner.  10:22, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * About to go to bed but I'll give a shot again tomorrow. It is very interesting though - Inflation Theory (while posing so many more questions) does away with the physics mess that is a singularity. It is very elegant really, like evolution. Acei9 10:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Wiki tools for web pages
You mentioned some time ago that you wished you had wiki tools for editing your website. Have you ever tried something like TiddlyWiki? You'd still probably have to upload it everytime, but it does make for a nice, self-contained platform with some wiki functions. (It's more limited than Mediawiki, but nonetheless, it's easy to use, and it saves as HTML.) Just a thought. Šţěŗĭļė 02:45, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll take a look at that sometime - the daunting part of the task would be converting 100s of files to a new format. Ick.  But at humanspeakers.com it would be really nice to have the dropdown menus be a template, so if I want to change them I don't have edit every fricking file on the site!

hi
--Fuck you motherfucker (talk) 02:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello darling, you smell ravishing. 08:35, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Your categories
Why are you spamming your user page in a bunch of categories? -- Nx  / talk 13:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 'Cause he's Human and he thinks it's funny to do that.  22:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Speaker man!
You like old speaker systems, right? Well, I saw this and thought of you : )   22:25, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Argh, I kan haz houseburger? I want my hour back!  Amusingly, my stereo gear is also built into the wall.  But it's just a big box with adjustable shelves and a back that can be removed in the adjacent room (the poopshed).  02:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Facebook
I just saw your profile on Facebook. You're old. Keegscee (talk) 22:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I knew that. 23:59, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * He's fat and drunk too. WTF? Nutty Roux (talk) 00:04, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Not to mention, hairy like a mountain ape. Acei9 00:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Human, why didn't you tell us all this before?! 00:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Nobody asked. And the beard's only a few months old.  00:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Right after that first comment, Huw, the correct answer was "Fuck off".  DogP Marmite Patrol 00:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Nah. That would have been mean. For some reason I think everyone on RW is a young college student like myself. All older people are supposed to be mean and bitter, like TK. Keegscee (talk) 00:59, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You would be incorrect in that assumption.  Many of us remember vinyl.   What's vinyl, you ask?   To which the answer, yet again, is "Fuck off".   DogP Marmite Patrol 01:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hell, half the people here don't remember the compact disc. 01:43, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, Ace. Nutty Roux (talk) 01:03, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Want me to get him for you? I think he's outside.  01:43, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The older residents of RW are more fun than the younger ones. I remember many a-time when I've stayed up late into the night getting drunk with some of the aforementioned editors 10:31, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Donald Sutherland? 11:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Your mountain man look kinda reminds me of Robert Redford. 01:15, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll take both those comments as compliments.  Thank you.  I just wish I had Redford's lanky locks.  Maybe I'll grow them out again and see what they are like, my beard is sure different than when I was younger...  02:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Hey Human!
Thanks for your support :-) anyway i feel way better then before. Also it is me or Rationalwikiwiki is totally not Updated daily? hahaWaronstupidity (talk) 00:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, and glad you feel better. RWW often goes days, if not weeks, without being updated.  00:30, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

More episoed of ancient aliens!
Watch the pseudohistory channel this Tuesday night at 6:00 pm EST. There is a brand new episode of that ancient aliens nonsense show! 21:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Goonie dahling, you type like you drink. In an organized line, but all mixed up ;)  When will it be repeated after Malloy is on, so we can liveblog it?  03:51, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Annoyed
I am annoyed, my Sunday newspaper is now almost completely news free. It seems to only contain lite "features" and advertising. Acei9 03:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Mine used to at least have a "straight" crossword puzzle, but I could solve it as fast as I could write. It also had op-ed pieces by cool people and morons.  And three more pounds (1.4 kG) of dead trees.  I liked the real estate section. Oh, and sometimes the cartoons in color. Does yours at least have a puzzle?  PS, I take it you fixed that silly arsebook mistake I made?  03:50, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't do nothing. Acei9 03:53, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * OK. Can you email me where I did that bad thing so I can delete it?  I couldn't find it.  My arsebook-fu is totally non-existent.  03:57, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Just go to the page you post it on, find the comment and click delete. Easy. Acei9 04:10, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but I couldn't remember where I posted it, and couldn't find it in all the walls and bridges arsebook sets up to make itself unnavigable. It's not like a wiki where I can click "Special:Contributions/Human my stupidities" and look for the one I want to make go away.  04:14, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

FYI
Human, do some homework. Observe how the MEDCAB works. (Goatse dispute) You should familiarize yourself how WP:DR works. I'm here to help. nobsdon't bother me 23:00, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you're on about there, Rob. Care to explain?  23:05, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This img in dispute (whether or not its acceptable content for WP) once upon a time was uploaded to CP about the time disputes were raging over cp:Gay bowel syndrome. Open cases are good to follow, cause the MEDCAB guys usually are up to speed on policy changes based on recent ArbCom findings and remedies (most of these guys wanna run for ArbCom or Board of Trustees someday, and bringing disputing parties together looks good on their record). nobsdon't bother me 23:22, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Rob, I still have no idea what your point is. On wikipedia I mostly fix typos and remove stray words that obviously don't belong.  What does that have to do with your medicine cabinet?  23:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I again support vandal binning Rob, if only to force him to use the preview button. Wanking with one hand and wikilawyering with the other seems to introduce a lot of errors. --Kels (talk) 23:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * ...such as the Kara's Yellow Dress episode? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 23:26, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Served it's purpose. We collected twenty-three usernames involved in that violation of Harassment, (and I'm just a single user):
 * Harassment of other Wikipedians in forums not controlled by the Wikimedia Foundation creates doubt as to whether an editor's on-wiki actions are conducted in good faith. Off-wiki harassment will be regarded as an aggravating factor by administrators and is admissible evidence in the dispute-resolution process, including Arbitration cases. &mdash; Unsigned, by: RobSmith / talk / contribs
 * Looks like you're in trouble then, Rob. 00:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * That, and the suspicious stains on his photo of Joe McCarthy. --Kels (talk) 23:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Harassment in off-Wikipedia fora? but that incident had nothing to do with Wikipedia--it was RW people making fun of CP-people, Where does WP figure into all that? TheoryOfPractice (talk) 00:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You have nothing to worry about, so long as you are not a Wikipedian. If you are active now, and you've edited wp:Conservapedia and the wp:RationalWiki entry in the past, or are presently engaged, I'd advise due caution regarding user conduct and interaction with other editors. nobsdon't bother me 00:37, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Rob, please stop harassing this wikipedian on this non-wp website. You wanna talk about wp issues with me, please do it on wikipedia. Take this as a formal demand.   00:42, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * @ Rob--if this is a WP issue, what is it doing on MY WIKI?!?!?!? Stop ruining my wiki!!!! TheoryOfPractice (talk) 01:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Just curious
I saw that many (apparently) Rationalwikians were originally on Conservapedia but left to start RW. Were you one of them? rational ghey (send a message) 00:36, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I, along with 20-30 others, was blocked three years ago tomorrow, and had been on RW 1 for a month or two prior to that. We restarted the site ("RW 2") about a week later.  Click the link at the blurb over your watchlist or recent changes that says "night of the blunt knives" for more of the story.  00:39, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Were you all like conservative originally who became disgusted with CP or were you (and the others) always liberal? Just curious rational ghey (send a message) 00:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No, we aren't Cons turned Libs. Most of us went there when we heard of the place in March or so 2007, and stuck around to either argue with the stupid or because messing around on an empty wiki is fun.  00:54, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Funnn. Btw I moved my USP because I like looking at the colored RW logo. rational ghey (send a message) 01:25, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I first heard of CP soon after it started then lurked on RW from about Nov 2007 until I joined March 2008. I was never a conservative...or a liberal actually. I am a moderate with libertarian leanings. Acei9 01:28, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You just love teh rational gheys :) rational ghey (send a message) 01:30, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Nope, I am quite prejudice really. Heh. Acei9 01:38, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Infinity
I know I'm still new here but a revert at Infinity? I'm at a loss. . . Lacrimosus (talk) 00:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * "The number days in a calendar week is finite" was not an improvement over the existing text, I guess? 01:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, but add an "of" in there and she's apples. Lacrimosus (talk) 02:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The original version was fine, and to fix your mistake I would have had to edit a section, find the missing word's position, type it in, leave edit comment, hit save.... rollback was one-click shopping. Feel free to fix it properly. If you "edit" your version of the diff it ought to be fairly easy.  02:46, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

RW 1.0
No, but I did read something somewhere (must've been here in RW 2.0) that two users did maintain complete records, the disasterbate founder & someone else (might've been you or Colin, can't remember). nobsdon't bother me 05:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sadly, no. Trent does not have the RW 1 dB, and of course Colin doesn't since he disappeared into "life" shortly after registering the url.  Sure wasn't me.  Many of us saved "surfaces", or history-lacking last versions - my user page and talk page here both include those archives, and many userboxes here were copied en masse between the Purge and the Resurrection. It's been an interesting three years.  The minor problem I have with your copies is that they lack context - previous edits and possible later edits.  It's a pity that RW 1 has been lost, it was a fun time.  05:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * PS, what's a "disasterbate"? You should WP to write an article with that title ;)  05:45, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It might have been in a posting from an anonymous IP here. Hey, I just found the original All Articles page, I can give you a copy if you want it. Disasterbate.com was tmt's original wiki idea which was moreless merged into RW after Colin bowed out & tmt took over. nobsdon't bother me 06:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, anything from the old days is nice to have. My email is enabled here.  Hmmm, interesting story about d.com I guess?  Does the url survive yet? (checking now)  06:57, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Not so much merged, as a different idea entirely. But, yeah, Trent is a creative bastid.  06:58, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Here's All articles Rationalwiki 1.0 which includes a Disasterbate entry. So, many of these treasures are lost to posterity, hmmm. nobsdon't bother me 07:17, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Very nice work, my suspicious friend. Is that a solid archive or is it fragile?  Since it's google I suspect the former, so I can just bookmark it and enjoy at my leisure.  07:31, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, damn, never mind. All the links are dead.  Not as much fun as I thought.  07:32, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

I waybacked RW mainpage out of curiosity. Goes back to late May 2007. On the main page? "RobS grumpily accepts that his New Ordeal article is an essay, but still bans user Irat as the door shuts behind him." Hi-larious. 07:54, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ironically, the only contact I had w/tmt back in the day was cp:Talk:Communist Party of the United States of America. And it was User:BillOreilyFan who initiated the discussion, with Hoji suggesting to tmt how to resolve the dispute. And it was Hoji who alerted us who put the "fuck this neocon bullshit" into CP'S logo. with a link to WP where BillOreillyFan confessed.  And it was Hoji who vandalized this page  whom tmt said, "Hoji is on our side! He is one of our kinda deep cover guys." []  nobsdon't bother me 15:24, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * P.S. Meant what I said, I'll post a non-controversial Summery statement in the Forum section and hopefully we can get all the embarassing stuff behind us and move forward. nobsdon't bother me 15:24, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I hope that "embarrassing stuff" will include the Krugman "quote" on the oil spill. By the way, I don't know if you're hip to this, but one of the longest-running memes at RW, built on CP paranoia dating back to before the night of the blunt knives, is that we are an organized cabal.  Hell, we even "Ides"ed ourselves a year or so ago.  Scared the shit out of everyone who didn't get the joke.  They thought we were going to risk unplugging the internet.  01:56, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hah!  That was a blast.    DF56 HHDF USXZ 8JNS 6D4S LPNN GHUA MMS9.  DogP Marmite Patrol 14:59, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Always beware the ides of May. (PS DogP: MMR9 not MMS9.) Šţěŗĭļė 15:32, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh shit you're right.  That came out wrong when i copy/pasted it from the WikiHax0r software I think.   DogP Marmite Patrol 16:27, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * [message redacted] --Kels (talk) 16:28, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * How many users still exist from RW1? Five or so?--BobSpring is sprung! 16:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * That's what we want them to think, yes. --Kels (talk) 16:47, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

It might be the salt in my veins but......
.....you have 20 years on me. Stop being such a fucking baby. Acei9 10:50, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Quoi? 11:01, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ich Bein ein Ace. Acei9 11:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ich dein. 11:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes
You do seem to be the PC censor on the site. --Leotardo (talk) 14:53, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Fart
FAAAAAAART.
 * time stamp 02:38, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Welcome back
Thanks. Good to see some familiars still around. --emc  [TALK]


 * time stamp 02:39, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Grow the fuck up
Stop acting like a little child. You don't have support for your version of the template so stop fucking with it. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 11:16, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ohhhh, it's onnnnnnnnn!! 11:27, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

day counter
I asked rationalghey about this, and he referred me to you. Do you know if there's a way to add a permanent day counter to my user page? I'm trying to count up the days since I posted my CP username on my RW user page, but I don't want to have to update it manually every time. I just want it to count the days since May 21, 2010. Thank you! Pythonscript (talk) 23:11, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, but Human has been blocked permanently for exceeding the reasonable amount of contributions to our site (over 50,000). Perhaps this would be a general thing to bring to tech support? 23:15, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I think we have a template for returning the difference between two dates, with options for things like "today". I'll chase it down and post it on your talk page.  00:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I answered you in two places. Ever look at a talk page timestamp?  I hope I didn't have to do something custom to see the magic addition of how long ago the datestamps are.  01:13, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a "gadget" that one has to turn on in their preferences. 01:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Moar ancient aliens woo
Same bat time, same bat channel this Tuesday. Did you happen to catch the marathon yesterday? I wasn't around, but I guess my brothers were watching/laughing at it. 01:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I had a bit on around 9 or so but got bored and watched some intentional comedy instead. We should check the repeat schedule for the best one to liveblog, since 6 PM isn't really "tv time" for me.  01:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, I think the replay of that all new episode is later that night right after Malloy ends. 02:28, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sweet. 02:33, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

What's a newt?
I got bored and found some special pages, and it says that you're a newt. I'm curious. -- ConcernedResident omg ponies!!! 17:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * A newt is an adult eft. Totnesmartin (talk) 17:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * To quote the old joke, you must be an engineer. What you said is technically accurate but doesn't help me. -- ConcernedResident omg ponies!!! 21:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a newt. It was probably Bohdan's idea.  It enables me to prevent any of your edits from taking effect, while making the version of the wiki you see look like they did.  That, and I'm a bit slimy.  04:13, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiSynergy
Now that we've driven off the last hope for the Wiki, now's the time to make our move and make the Wiki ours whilst Purple Scissors looks the other way. Mwhahahahahahaha!!! 06:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Interesting idea! 07:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

"You seem to enjoy insulting me."
Who doesn't, you sack a' crap! 20:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hehe, good one. 20:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I he knows, I he thought it up himself. Exceedingly witty. 22:45, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

What's the point of this?
I don't want to get into an edit war with you. You've obviously been here much longer than I have, and you're welcome to revert any of my edits if I broke some explicit or unwritten rule that I'm not familiar with. But I'm pretty sure deleting something because it doesn't tickle your particular funny bone isn't a valid reason, especially when there's a voting system in place to let everyone judge it. If you're able to come up with something better, go ahead, but please don't simply scrap it unless you can give a reason apart from you thinking it's stupid. Again, I'm not trying to pick a fight with you, certainly not over a silly joke like that, but imposing your subjective opinion like that frankly pisses me off. Röstigraben (talk) 10:13, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You added a completely lame addition to a perfectly fine wigo. The voting up was based on the version before you made a mess of it.  Also, while I do remember the "incident", when asking a question as you are above, generally it is good form to include a difflink or at least tell your interlocutor what the hell you are talking about.  And, yeah, your addition added nothing of use, as I recall.  If you want to discuss it further, please at least paste in a difflink here so I can remember what we were arguing about yesterday.  Thanks for your time.  PS, as I recall, I deleted it because it tickled my "stupid" bone.  So there.   10:19, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, here's your difflink. Since you just reverted it an hour or two ago, I assumed you knew what I was referring to. But since I didn't argue with you about anything yesterday, I don't have a clue what the hell you're talking about there. So, just to clarify, you think it's acceptable to simply delete anything you consider stupid? What's the voting system for, then? The author of the original WIGO explicitly asked for someone to edit it, and that's what I did. Röstigraben (talk) 10:37, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think it is fair to delete stupidity. "Maybe Ken is just disappointed that he couldn't catch another glimpse of this outfit?" Is stupid.  If you want that to be voted on - remember, you tacked it onto an already good wigo - try posting it on its own.  Zero content and just plain fucking stupid.  Sorry to put it so bluntly.  Let me rephrase.  Zero content and basically lame.  It did not improve the wigo or make any sense in any way other than to add a lame joke and put up a useless picture.  Yes, maybe the "original" author asked for "help", but your edit was just trash, not help.  10:45, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Insert 'OMG, you're TK' template here. EddyP (talk) 10:55, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * This whole discussion is way too much for half a joke. I am only commenting because this page currently lack a goat template. 11:00, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I searched for that template the other day, couldn't find it. The title is counter-intuitive as I recall.  11:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * What goat? 11:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * (EC)It obviously wouldn't have made any sense as a standalone joke. Once again, you're not the sole arbiter of what's funny and what's stupid, that's why there's a voting system. If something gets voted down as a result of an edit, you might have a case for reverting. Or maybe if the original author doesn't like it, although a WIGO is hardly anyone's property, and I don't go around deleting later edits to my WIGOs either. If you still think your individual opinion is so important or objective that you don't have to wait for others to judge an edit, have your way then. Röstigraben (talk) 11:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You just don't get it, do you? 11:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * (EC)For the record, after the removal of the implied gay joke my vote went from neutral to down. I am getting sick of Ken wigos. He is the new TK or Rob, doing dumb shit just to see themselves getting talked so they feel important. 11:05, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Therein lies the problem that all our wigo's will be Andy related. Acei9 11:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I thought it was pretty funny. But what the hell do I know. 11:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * You were all free to revert my deletion, of course, and if you did, I woulda shut the hell up. 11:47, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Seriously
Posting crap that essentially says "Wow! Andy will react like a twat to this and won't it be funny!!!!111!!" doesn't reflect well on the site. Don't do it, even if it is your wiki. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 01:27, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I only brought it up because it is right on the heels of Coleman's tragic death. 01:31, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, and while because "Hollywood values" may have made Coleman's life harder, Hopper utterly epitomized them. 01:31, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * And also also, I didn't post what you put in quote marks above. You can't even paraphrase what I wrote to mean what the words you are putting into my fingers.  01:32, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * That's why I had the word "essentially" in there. Don't play semantics to get out of having acted like a cunt. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 01:39, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No, it's not "essentially" what I said. I also typed what I wrote as I was still clicking through MPR diffs, and I was literally cringing as I did so after seeing the hatchet job he did on Coleman.  Keep in mind that what I wrote was essentially "Andy already reacted like a twat in one instance this weekend, oh fuck, I hope he doesn't go for a two-fer."   01:50, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, "acting like a cunt" is deleting talk page comments then arguing with the person who posted them on their talk page without even linking to the alleged cuntly acts. Why didn't you just engage me in the section over at talk wigo cp? Keep in mind, whether I was right, wrong, or something in between, one of our oldest community standards is to not delete talk page comments. What would have "reflected well on the site", to take your side, would have have been an outpouring of "Human you're being an ass" and "Oh, sorry you're right" on the talk page in question, not sweeping it under the rug and then coming here and bitching me out.  01:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No. You need to listen to the many people who are telling you to stop acting like a fucking idiot. You have been acting more and more like you think you own this site and it's pretty obvious that more and more people are getting more and more pissed off. I've tried to talk to you off-wiki about this but you didn't respond to my email so now you get a bollocking in public.
 * This is not your wiki. You do not get to act like a cunt by posting that kind of crap because it does not matter what was going through your head while you were reading it.
 * I deleted your talk page comments because they represented exactly that kind of shit we criticise Andy for. The fact that you can't understand this speaks volumes. Now. Are you going to start behaving like the community here means something or are you going to keep getting spanked by users who are pissed off with your fucking awful attitude? Your choice. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 02:04, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Meh, whatever. You broke the rules and handled it the wrong way.  Try resending your email, it might have been filtered to trash along with the other 1000 spams I get daily on the email I use for personal business.  Tell me it's on the way and I'll check the trash for RationalWiki email. Also, taking wiki business private is also frowned upon... Are you following any of this?  02:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't try that. You broke the rules on decency and I reacted accordingly. You were out of order and you know it yet you're now going for some meta-conflict instead. I'm not interested.
 * It was an email sent to you and two others about the cockfight over the logo redesign. I know at least one of you got it, and there's no reason the other two of you would have failed to get it either since I have used the same email address to contact you before. I sent it to you three in private because I was trying to spare your blushes, but you've since outdone yourself anyway so yes - I needn't have bothered.
 * Basically, sort yourself out. I'd rather "break the rules" (what rule?) by trying to sort something out offline than break public decency by going one step lower down the rungs of decency than Schlafly by trying to make a point from something you think he might say at some point in the future. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 02:15, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Right, sure. You are so far into lala land now I can't even follow you. 02:19, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sober up and try again. There are too many people who think you're acting like a moron at the moment for it to be a coincidence. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 02:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I am tempted to move this to talk:wigo cp and place the comments that sparked it above, or at least the diff. What's your problem, anyway? 02:27, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry.... but you added this comment to a similar story, and you have to ask what you did wrong??? –SuspectedReplicant retire me 02:39, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yup, I did indeed. Now fuck off.  02:47, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


 * And now we end up with the standard Human response: argumentum ad vulgari. You know you were wrong, don't you? Of course you do. You're a stubborn ass but not an idiot. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 02:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No, just quit wasting my time on my talk page over a dead issue. I let your second deletion ride, you dumb fuck.  02:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Birther video
Good one! --UnicornTapestry (talk) 05:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I did something right for a change? Awesome.  Thanks!  05:51, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

It's alive!!!
Don't know for how, long but WikiSynergy lives! Conservative Punk (talk) 20:16, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, it twitched, at least. It won't really be "alive" until at least two fringers are actively adding to it.  But nice to see PS still pops in from time to time.   21:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

/* Why have you abandoned Rationalwikian values? */ boring, archived
You've let yourself down Human. You really have. 86.40.97.164 (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Uneat the fruit of wisdom. Uneat it!!--Brendiggg (talk) 19:15, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 'cause people like you have trampled all over them and made them untenable in order to stroke their own egos. Congratulations, MC. You've won. You're a big, big troll in a small, small pond. You must be very proud of yourself. P-Foster (talk) 19:24, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No, that's not it and your ideological impurity is showing. Watch yourself, P-Foster. The correct answer is that Human cannot abandon RationalWikian values because Human is RationalWikian values. Class dismissed. You may be excused. ÑR /Señor Admin/Hablar 19:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Human is RationalWiki is Human. 20:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * STFU, novice. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 20:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It sickens me how you just allowed a tiny oligarchy to impose authoritarianism on this site, against the wishes of the vast majority. Its not their fault that they are so naive and stupid that they can't see what they're doing. Human, you are supposed to be different, you are supposed to oppose this fascism. Now all you do is play up to their prejudices. Fight back, like a man! Stop this cowardly witlessness. Tell them what you really think, stop allowing this idiots to ruin this site! All tyrannys start off as innocuous and 'necessary' - unfortunately, these tyrants will take your necessary liberties in order to live in squalor - stand up to them Human. Be the man you were born to be. 86.40.97.164 (talk) 21:21, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Human's a man? But I just wired her €500 for a plane ticket and a marriage licence! I think I need a wikibreak. ConcernedResident  Fightin' round the world 18:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * What disgusts me is that it's not against the wishes of the majority. It seems like most users are happy to censor and ban rather than ignore or even ridicule. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 18:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * STFU, shithead. 19:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't get you, Neveruse. You don't seem to like this site or anyone on this site, yet you keep coming back. Is there some history of which I'm not aware? Colonel of Squirrels白山羊不山羊. 商讨. 19:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * There are quite a few people here who I like (I used to have a list on my user page), but you might not know from our interactions here. AI'm here far more for entertainment purposes than to be a part of some cabal community. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:13, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The "elephant" in this case is like a person, who at every party, encourages the nutter to whip his dick out and wave it around the place. Sure it's funny at the start, but it gets a bit tedious when he finally stop getting invited to the party but someone keeps opening the window to let him and his well aired little solder in. It just gets a bit old. ConcernedResident  Fightin' round the world 19:23, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Then ignore it...oh yeah... never mind. &mdash; Sincerely, Neveruse / Talk / Block 19:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Can I point out the massive elephant in the room that Neveruse is by far one of the biggest dickheads on the site and causes just about the same amount of grief as any of the BoNs or other established trolls, which are probably also Neveruse trying to stir up shit more effectively. You know, just saying. 19:07, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Armondikov is quite right, Neveruse is a shit stirring asshole. Acei9 20:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

I would have done the same
Re this edit.

I haven't loaded any RW page since our little chat the other night so I missed the original post in that topic. If I had been online when it was made, I would have removed it exactly as I did in the case that caused our minor and utterly polite disagreement. It's not just about you and I apologise if it came over that way. Crap like this really pisses me off. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 00:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I saw your comment there, yes. Thanks for popping by to make sure I knew!  01:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Speaking of WikiSynergy
You may find this little thingy about that "green goose" dolt of interest. 05:22, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Re:Neveruse
I'd say give it some time for this BS to blow over before you go re-sysopping him. Not that I mind Neveruse, it's just that he has been acting a little dickish lately, and it isn't like him being a non-sysop for a time is gonna kill him (so long as people keep their banhammers away from him, of course). 06:18, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * "Lately"? His character has been "dickish" for like two years now.  But he does not abuse his sysopric, and we don't actually have a rule against dickishness, so why take it away?  But if you want to remove it again - with a note saying when it's ok to reinstate for clarity - I won't argue.  06:22, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you're right Huw. I think I was just trying to pre-empt an HCM over it that doesn't appear to have materialized anyways. Conservative Punk (talk) 09:07, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Well done you!

 * 19:19, 7 June 2010 TK (Talk | contribs) changed block settings for Human  (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 5 years (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked) ‎ (Member of a website supporting vandalism: Good faith reduction in block length commensurate with editors own demonstrated good faith.)

Acei9 23:21, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Gee gosh golly. So I'll be able to remove that parody I mentioned in 2015! 23:26, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Sigh. Some of us are still infinitely blocked!  Šţěŗĭļė 01:43, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I think that you're block being cut down to 5 years is an outrage! Perhaps we should call in the, as I am of the opinion that your capitulation with TK is treason! 02:12, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Can we ask the mob (the other five editors) what specifically they would like us to "rule" on?
Since you asked. Personally I think that the main issue is not so much with the trolls themselves, just a reformulation of the rules regarding removing and/or archiving comments from talk pages. IMHO that is the issue here. --DamoHi 00:22, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you I will duplicate the above at the LJ talk page ? . Thanks!  01:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, a struckout question mark looks really cool! 03:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Hi, I'm new here. I was wondering how I should get started around here. Any suggestions? Thanks. Sleepy (talk) 00:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hanging out at the Saloon Bar (link to left under "community") is a good place to get a feel for the people that are active here. Also, reading the links in the "welcome" box Goonie left on your talk page might be useful. If you balance that with a bit of "diving in and editing" you should learn the ropes pretty quickly.  Cheers, and welcome!  01:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)


 * When I'm at a loose end, I middle-click "Random page" twenty times and read through and see if anything could do with work - David Gerard (talk) 09:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Me too, but I thought that might be a little too much for a new user... maybe it should be in the new user guide, though? Not sure about that. But, yeah, thanks!  10:16, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Add new section button
Only on Talk pages? 09:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I guess? Not sure what you mean, but I think I whinged about this earlier.  Yeah, some non-talk pages should have + buttons.  10:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

patrolled ?
Hi Human,

You posted on an the talk page of Hinduism that you marked my edits as patrolled. Can you explain what this means? Thanks Quazywabbit (talk) 02:05, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. Since you are not a sysop, your edits have little red exclamation points next to them for sysops on recent changes, etc.  So when I mark your edit "patrolled" it means someone who cares has looked at it and says "this is ok".  Sorry if the wiki-language made it sound creepy.  02:13, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah ok. Well I guess its a good thing then. Quazywabbit (talk) 02:25, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is. Sorry it wasn't clear from the context.  Thanks for your help!  02:27, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Science and Math Defeated
Mrs. Human,

I do not understand what you are doing. Many of my edits were incontroversial why would you change them. I understand a few we could argue about. Notedscholar (talk) 02:12, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I am not married. Although there are some swains who wish I would be. Please talk about articles on their own talk pages so every one can follow. Kisses,  02:12, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Omg Miss Human why do you keep on just deleting my edits. Which ones do you have problems with exactly? 'Moar' isn't even a word. Notedscholar (talk) 02:19, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You are doing what we call "whitewashing" an article that is about a subject we critique. You are also making a mess of the grammar.  If there are spelling errors, please fix them separately from content edits. And quit changing "their" to "his or hers", it's really bad writing.  02:22, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Let's be clear on one thing. "Their" is the very worst. The only question is whether to put "his" or "his or her." Check any standard grammar! Notedscholar (talk) 02:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Only if we know they are singular. "Their" can mean both plural and singular, and is gender inclusive.  02:31, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 'Their' is never singular. 'His' is the traditional term for referring to gender-neutral referents. Politically correct writing says "his or her." Notedscholar (talk) 02:32, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No, that's "bad" writing. Their can imply singular, if we don't know how many there are. 02:34, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I think it's time to expand it to Science, Math and English Defeated 12:25, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * See Strunk and White's The Elements of Style, 4th edition 2000, pg. 60-61. I'll quote one relevant passage: "A similar fault is the use of the plural pronoun with the antecedent anybody, somebody, someone, the intention being either to avoid the awkward he or she or to avoid committing oneself to one or the other. Some bashful speakers even say, "A friend of mine told me that they...."" The use of he as a pronoun for nouns embracing both genders is a simple, practical convention rooted in the beginnings of the English language. Currently, however, many writers find the use of the generic he or his to rename indefinite antecedents limiting or offensive. Substituting he of she in its place is the logical thing to do if it works." As they say on RationalWiki, QED! Notedscholar (talk) 00:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, I should add that your epistemological point that we don't know "how many" there are is a gramatical non-issue. Plus you're being ridiculous since the beginning of the RationalWiki article itself says it's by an "individual." Also, it is clear from the style of the blog that it has one author (me). And, the blog itself has a bio page for the author. There are group blogs, and they say so! Notedscholar (talk) 00:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I should point out that I know quite a few language and literature scholars and the general consensus is to completely shun strict rules in favour of doing what suits the flow and function of the text, split infinitives and all. Anyone can show off by being a pedant. 00:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Does the author bio page say whether it is a boy or a girl? 00:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Just say Nobama
I don't know how ignorant liberals like you could possibly support Barack Obama's plan to raise all our taxes to 150% just so that the socialists don't have to work. How can you supprt a Congress that will raise our taxes? That's taxation without representation! Here. I suggest you and your communistic fascist friends get the wake up call before it's too late! Conservative Punk (talk) 03:54, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Goonie, why aren't ignorant liberals like you out proteting the latest real Obama outrage? If the Bush administration had (allegedly) bombed a country the US isn't at war with, killing 14 women and 21 children with cluster munitions (...as an aside, why aren't American liberals pressuring Barry to join the civilized world and sign the cluster munitions ban?) liberals would be frothing at the mouth. Where's your rage now? P-Foster (talk) 04:30, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * How dare you call me, Conservative Punk, a liberal! I'm more conservative than all of Conservapedia (a relatively liberal site) combined! On a serious note, though, I've been involved in the movements to ban both cluster bombs and (especially) landmines for some time now. It's a little known fact that the United States joined such vestiges of liberty as Libya, China, and Iran in its refusal to join civilization and join that landmine ban treaty. Conservative Punk (talk) 04:44, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Silly, everyone knows that landmines provide full-time employment for one-legged chilluns in the developing world! 07:49, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

How unlike you
You've become a completely different person and have abandoned rationalwikian values. I'm ashamed of you. 86.45.199.155 (talk) 11:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

reminder to check for Schlafly court vid
http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/webcast/archive.htm

02:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Must use IE, launches in WMP. 05:47, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

You cannot ignore me
I am your conscience, Human. Ignore me all you like, but I will always be here to remind you how you betrayed the core values of this site. You cozy up to that damned oligarchy and show no shame whatsoever for your crimes. 86.40.99.26 (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Are you still here? Your analysis of the "decision" is so completely wrong it's not as funny as you can be.  00:48, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You used to be proud and a man of integrity. Now you're just another automoton in a gutter full of slime. For shame. 86.40.207.37 (talk) 10:01, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Proud? Of my integration skills?  Shirley you jest.  03:58, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * He does jest, and don't call him Shirley. Conservative Punk (talk) 05:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * "man of integrity" Huw? Really? Huh, whadda ya know Acei9 04:18, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Aliens woo again
Just stopping by from real life for an edit to tell you that another episode of Aliensdidit is on again this Tuesday at midnight EST, immediately following Malloy. Cheers! FrankThePseudoscientist (talk) 02:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * We'll have to remember to liveblog it. Ooh, the stupid, it hurts!  17:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

What say you....
That we re-hash our ancient battles and find some sources for the Gaia hypothesis article? I was looking through it, and there appear to be many areas where sources could be found, but aren't listed. 05:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Couldn't hurt to try... 17:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Lies!
According to you chart, you made David Gerard a bureaucrat. According to his user rights log, however, I was the one who ultimately 'cratted him. I demand you explain yourself! 02:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Many people have been cratted, uncratted, and recratted. I used the first cratting date for my database. Although "crediting" him to you would at least make the image narrower... Looking through these logs was a strange little window into RW history...  02:51, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Email
I has sent you one. 19:24, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Conspiracy is afoot.
I know you see it. As much as you wish to avoid confrontation, the hour is approaching when you must stand up to the abuses of power now rampant on this site. Silence is no longer an option. Either you make a stand, or Rationalwiki as the once glorious idea it was, will die.

I recommend you move against Gerard first. He is a wikipedian, he is without honour, without humour, and without compassion. He must be the first to go. 86.40.192.109 (talk) 14:34, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Have you nothing to say for yourself? I appreciate you prevented the authoritarian powers that be from reverting the last edit, but surely you must understand the dangers and authoritarianism now rampant on this site. Are you really so spineless? 86.40.106.222 (talk) 10:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No, that was Jellyfish. 02:49, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Jellyfish? That reminds me, is the part of New Hampshire you're from near the ocean at all? 05:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Pretty much, yeah. The baddest ass jelly I ever saw was on a beach in Wales, couple feet across dead on the beach.  Up in Nova Scotia on a fambly holydaze we saw lots of little purple jellies on the beach.  No spines to speak of.  Or backbones.  05:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Or brains. I believe, though I may well be wrong, jellyfish are actually very simple animals. Thus, proof that evolution is wrong!  05:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Silly BoN, you should know by now that if there's a conspiracy, Human's in charge of it. 09:44, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It is clearly obvious that Human is a patsy. The conspiracy allows it to appear as though Human is in charge, whilst the truth is he is a powerless figurehead. The conspiracy controls all, at least until MC exposed it. These blockings he receives by those with vested interest are only an attempt to silence him and the claims of trolling are an attempt to discredit him before he finds and exposes the person who is truly behind the conspiracy. It is clearly obvious that MC's efforts have sent the conspiracy into damage control. Keep fighting MC, keep fighting. 23:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You may mock, but some day I will prevail and RW will be liberated. 86.40.104.182 (talk) 23:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * They have me, but you are still free. Hurry, MC. You are our only hope. 23:51, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Mock all you want, but the following is true; 1) I get blocked every time I appear, 2) A new cadre of dullards (Such as that Gerard wanker) revert me at every opportunity, 3) You all laugh about these abuses, 4) You allow fascist scumbags like Gerard, who discriminates against users such as Earthland, and who literally rips up the constitution every time he appears on this site, to run riot. 5) You have no balls, and hence deserve no respect. You are contemptible, despicable cretins. 86.40.104.182 (talk) 23:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I handle DG's oversized ego in my own way, thank you. 06:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I know what you are saying. Why do you think I am not a crat anymore? They took that from me. I am a contemptible, despicable cretin, because I did not stand and fight. Keep strong, don't let these abuses wear you down as they did me. 23:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I think you should grow a backbone and stand up to these guys Human. I don't understand how they get away with indiscriminate blocking a page reversions. Every day it grows more and more like wikipedia - boring and authoritarian. 86.40.209.121 (talk) 22:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah! Why let "these guys" be so..  authoritarian?   Jerks.   Seriously, what's with this guy? Quaru (talk) 23:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Blowin. You don't know the first thing you're talking about. 86.40.104.182 (talk) 23:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 23:12, 19 June 2010 (UTC) TerrySmall.png [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]]
 * Fuck you Susan. 86.40.104.182 (talk) 23:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * That was rude. 03:43, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Skype
Get on Skype, Mofo! DickTurpis (talk) 03:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Trying, but you broke my Skype. hang on, I may need to reboot, who knows?  03:42, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Broken Skype! I will not be blamed! DickTurpis (talk) 03:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * My flaptop is all fucked up, I suspect my IP address might have changed and mucked things up. It's kinda frozen right now.  Emergency maneuvers in place, you haz important email.  03:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * All better. Did a battery-ectomy to force a hard reboot.  06:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Liquor is quicker, but Cheddar is better
Coming straight to you from a local library computer, here's some nice relaxing music for you! Enjoy Huw. See you again when my computer returns from India. 01:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Sweet, thanks! Hope you get your flappie back ASAP. 04:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

"An Herbal"
Is that correct? I was under the impression "an" is only used to prefix words starting with (or sounding as though they do) a vowel? So unless you're talking like the Jamacan girl I knew at Uni ("Are you smoking tha 'erb?") then I wouldn't think that sounded right. 08:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Stoopid yanks drop teh "H" on Herb - so it's like Hotel. 10:50, 22 June 2010 (UTC) TerrySmall.png [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]]
 * They say "otel"? 15:46, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * We do: an (h)otel. 16:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC) TerrySmall.png [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]]
 * I beg to differ. 'An hotel' has been regarded as old-fashioned since at least the late-seventies (according to my father's 1979 copy of A Concise Dictionary of Correct English) and 'a hotel' is perfectly acceptable in British English just as we now say 'a historian' or 'a historical novel'. Of course in some parts of England (Yorkshire?)everybody drops their aitches and even say "an 'ouse".  09:16, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * "I'm just an old-fashioned girl ...." 09:50, 26 June 2010 (UTC) TerrySmall.png [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]]

Stand up to them
They're going to start issuing rangeblocks next. Whether you like it or not, you have to stand up to these people. You have to remind them that RW means something, and that you won't tolerate fascism any longer. For Gods sake Human, have some self respect. 86.40.195.204 (talk) 15:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Get up! Stand up! [chka-wah chka-wah] Stand up for your rights!
 * Get up! Stand up! [chka-wah chka-wah] Don't give up the fight! DickTurpis (talk) 15:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Stop tolerating fascism and start embracing trolling! 15:46, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 'Community Blocked'??? Really? That is a wikipedia concept, and is in essence a legitimisation of a lynch mob. I simply cannot understand how Human tolerates this. 86.40.100.124 (talk) 17:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Human? Human?? Human??? Your silence is but proof of your guilt. 86.40.194.12 (talk) 21:49, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Who are you, and what are you on about? My, but you do seem a bore. DarkStar (talk) 22:06, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Who are you, and why do I care? 05:57, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh for GODS sake Human, now they are going to block me at every stage. You really are a vile old man. I used to think you were a vile old man with principles, but even that isn't true any more. 86.40.196.158 (talk) 08:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I have it on good authority that Human is as unscrupulous as he is vile. Acei9 08:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It's bizzare that people would want to block you when you make such pleasant comments as this around the place. 15:52, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I've been thinking about this Crundy, and I've concluded that you are indeed one of these people who enjoys been offended. You live for it. You then use this faux outrage to poison the community and introduce emergency, authoritarian measures (Such as indiscriminate blocking and reverting of my edits) In other words you are slime and yes, I would laugh heartily if your cat died as this would cause you to cry. Imagining fat tears rolling down your chubby ugly little face will sustain me through many of life's hurdles. I can only hope and pray that you do lose a cat, in order to experience this high degree of satisfaction. 86.40.111.77 (talk) 08:28, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Why thank you Graham. It's nice to see you turning over a new leaf. 09:19, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I am imagining fat chubby ugly right now. DeltaStar can hook you up. Acei9 09:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Why are you people editing other people's talk page comments? 22:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Human, I apologise for my previous comments. Clearly you are a man of integrity. 86.40.195.67 (talk) 08:32, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Here's one for ya!
Enjoy! 20:45, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Oooh, excellent. I like how the production values match the ethos of the era and the original recording.  One of the better performances of that song that I have seen.  22:48, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

"Plan to attack an editor or editors"
Since when has Marcus been an "editor"? 11:07, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * In a literal sense he is an editor as he edits pages telling us that altering what he says is somehow "fascist." But in a sense of editing articles he isn't, as are several long term members of the site, myself included. 11:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Right on, Superjosh. Frankly its disgusting that Crundy would want to treat me a little better, but then again I'm not surprised. A huge ego, and so little self awareness, that it was somehow inevitable would lose a basic grasp of what constitutes internet genocide. 86.40.200.55 (talk) 11:52, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Seriously MC, why the fuck are you even here? You hate us and we hate you. It seems the ideal solution for everyone is for you go elsewhere. DickTurpis (talk) 12:09, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Why does a cat meow? Why does a dog bark? Life is beautiful and diverse. 86.40.200.55 (talk) 12:16, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No. We wouldn't. 12:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You say that now. If I could be convinced somehow that you really wanted me to go, I'd go. If you unbin/unblock my account and make me sysop I'll leave. 86.40.204.38 (talk) 12:30, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Cats meow because they're cats. Dogs bark because they're dogs. So I guess you troll because you're a troll. That's not a very good response, and certainly not one to endear you to anyone. But you do posit an interesting hypothesis: "You'd miss me if I went." Being a website promoting the scientific method, I think it is best we test that hypothesis. DickTurpis (talk) 14:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Much in the way that a repeated blow on the head is "missed" when it stops. 14:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC) TerrySmall.png [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]]
 * Susan, why don't you pull 'leaving and never coming back stunt no. 2254', fuck off, and get a life? 86.45.204.102 (talk) 15:26, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Susan was actually missed when she left, and she loved us all so much she died for our sins took time out of her schedule to come back and hang out with us. 19:41, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

So, anyways, who here has any ideas on the best way to go about not accidentally the whole thing? 19:44, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Translate (from gibberish) please Goonie. 20:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC) TerrySmall.png [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]]
 * I think I accidentally the whole thing . 12:05, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Not like: I think not good post. 12:10, 28 June 2010 (UTC) TerrySmall.png [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]]

edits
Ha HA...! Your immature anger against me has caused you to be so erratic, that now even your ally has reverted you! Research psychologist (talk) 04:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Troll. P-Foster (talk) 04:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha HA...! My superior washing power has caused my whites to be so much whiter than yours! Acei9 05:11, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha HA! My superior clothes washing power has caused my colors to come out more colored than yours! 05:19, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Our bleaching procedures are superior to yours! PS, fuck off, RP.   05:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha ha! You are so easy to piss off! And everyone knows that MY bleaching process is superior to all of yours, for I use Cheer™ with colorguard! Research psychologist (talk) 06:13, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I find it very strange that this guy thinks everyone is angry all the time. The other day I was enjoying a nice cup of tea, pleased with myself that I had just solved this inversion problem I had been working on for weeks, and this nut comes along and tells me I am angry because I didn't think much of his badly spelled edits (and I thought they were badly spelled that is how bad they were) when I couldn't have been in a better mood. He is obviously a troll as he wants people to get angry at him. 05:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Mmmm, a nice cup of tea. I might have one before bed.  09:55, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Scrabble
Found this, in case you fancy playing Welsh Scrabble at any point. 07:56, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * That rulzors, thank you!!! 10:35, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You can find Welsh Scrabble for sale on Amazon where the one (and only) reviewer says: Top educational game with extra L's, G's and W's. Spit-resistant board a thoughtful feature. Not suitable for miners. Of course in Welsh LL counts as one letter as you will see in the definitive list of letters. 08:15, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Huh? 10:35, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

FSM
Your fiddling makes the layout look awful - too much white space under the Prayer section header. But it's your wiki so I guess we're stuck with it. 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Debinning
Linuxianthegreat should be vandal binned as he was only blocked for an hour and is the sock of a clear and known vandal. 12:23, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * And he also seems to have no trouble creating sockpuppets. Many of them, from what I can see? 12:25, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * So why does he need them unbanned then? 12:26, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Unbinned, not unbanned. Because it is pointless and I am sick of fascists on this site binning/banning people for silly reasons.  12:30, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It is just as pointless unbinning obvious vandal socks. You accuses David of power-tripping but this is just as bad, "oh look at me I can revert all you bins because I am the final arbitrator". Whatever, I don't care either way. 12:35, 11 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Your valiant defence of worthless trolls against mere users who aren't here just to be fuckwits is noble and admirable - David Gerard (talk) 12:37, 11 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Wow, that takes me back. Ah, those Halcyon days when Human was calling me a fascist instead.  Go bravely, young man, I pass the torch to you! --Kels (talk) 14:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * People use that freaking F-bomb far too much. It dilutes the actual meaning of the word, and anyway, you can't be fascist on RW because the system is set up to encourage anti-authoritarian behaviour and there's no way one individual could realistic enforce a "fascist" regime. 14:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * That's quitter talk, mister! --Kels (talk) 14:55, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * What are you, a FASCIST? - David Gerard (talk) 15:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No, YOU'RE the fascist! 15:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * This is such self congratulatory backslapping from the mediocre intellects that reverted this site into a parody of rational debate and enlightenment. Gerard is an utter and absolute wanker, he is a despicable person, beneath my contempt. He is a cocksure, wikipedian geek with an authority complex intent on getting his way on just about everything. He ignores the counsel of his colleagues but continues the nonetheless the myopic quest to increase regulations on this site (Even though 2/3 of the member base is devotedly opposed to increased regulation)
 * How this utter bastard gets through the net time and time again I'll never know. 86.40.209.27 (talk) 16:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I knew there was something I liked about him. --Kels (talk) 16:29, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 86..., I know you don't like David, but I don't understand the basis of what you accuse him of. 20:16, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * My only issue with your unbinning spree Human is that you unbinned accounts used by Linuxian. The problem with blocking Linuxian as opposed to binning, I have found, is that once the block (usually 9 hours) expires, he goes right back to his onslaught from that account. Thus, binning is a more appropriate solution in that circumstance. 20:31, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above BON's edit with all nouns changed to the world "cheese," and it's derivatives:
 * This is such self congratulatory cheeseslapping from the mediocre cheeses that reverted this cheese into a parody of rational debate and cheese. Cheese is an utter and absolute cheeser', he is a despicable cheese, beneath my contempt. He is a cheese, cheeseian cheese with an cheesy cheesex intent on getting his way on just about everything. He ignores the cheese of his cheeses but continues the nonetheless the myopic cheese to increase regulations on this cheese (Even though 2/3 of the cheesy base is devotedly opposed to increased regulation)
 * How this utter cheese gets through the net time and time again I'll never know. 86.CHEESE.CHEESE.CHEESE 21:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Aliens Woo
More Ancient Aliens woo is on the Pseudo-history Channel this Tuesday night at the usual time (right after Malloy). 21:54, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

I hear ya
been there... AceLiquid Room 08:58, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You have a lot more patience for those idiots than I do. 09:21, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I spent a month long block studying cosmology, providing refs and elucidated my knowledge well and PJR still dismissed it without checking any of it. Patience is in short supply now, my friend. AceLiquid Room 09:28, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I could rephrase that as "you waste a lot more time on those morons than I do", but that might come across as a little rude, since I admire your fortitude in the face of blind stupidity. 09:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

BP cam
http://newsblogged.com/video-live-streaming-gulf-oil-spill-cam-bp-webcam

Just "bookmarking" to pull up on another machine. 20:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Rename
I think after 3+ years as Sterile (as a joke username at CP), I may rename myself to something more fun. I'm not quite sure what yet, though. Sterile 01:51, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I can rename you gential-itch if you like? AceX-102 01:54, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Or I can rename you flange-scrotum. DickTurpis (talk) 01:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * These suggestion just scream "fun". AceX-102 01:57, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Such tempting options. Sterile 01:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Renaming is not all it's cracked up to be. Plus, people don't immediately recognize you as your prior username, which I found to be a pain.  -- 01:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Up or down voting? DickTurpis (talk) 01:59, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * People ask questions when your username is Sterile. Sterile 02:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Penis Pie is a good name. AceX-102 02:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * (EC, sorry to interrupt) It can take us old-timers years to remember who the hell you used to be. I suggest "Castrated". Or "Autoclaved".  02:01, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Autoclaved? Compared to Penis Pie?  Are you sure?  Sterile 02:02, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I'll think about it. The repute thing is a good point.  What would happen if I were de-linked to such classics as Fun:40-gon and Geraldine Ferraro   Sterile 02:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If this isn't decided by 8 am CST tomorrow I'm preemptively renaming you Dr. Quim. It is decided. ÑR/Señor Admin/¡hablen ustedes! 03:53, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I think Nutty would make a good Penis Pie. -- 04:05, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Heh
I wondered how long that would take you. 03:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * At first I thought you were being a fool (sorry). Then I saw you were rescuing some other fool and cleaned up the lies.  04:06, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * PS, did you know that the two best TV show themes ever were written by the same person? 04:07, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ? 04:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC) TerrySmall.png [[Image:Toast s.png|alt=Toast|text-bottom|20px|link=User talk:SusanG]]
 * The Prisoner was the other one. 04:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Email
Did you get my e-mail? tmtoulouse 20:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmmmm, no, when did you send it? Resend?  20:51, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I sent it to the human thoughts address, but I will resend to the gmail as well. tmtoulouse 20:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Odd, nothing in either box. 02:50, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Replied. tmtoulouse 03:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ditto. I wonder why I didn't get the previous?  03:53, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It must not have been a very important email, that's probably what did it.  DogP Marmite Patrol 17:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Did you get this one? tmtoulouse 07:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * "Make her pleasures terrific"? Yeah I got the latest thanks.  07:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

My God's Bigger Than Your God
I, personally, think this song should become RationalWiki's anthem. 05:52, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hehe, a TrashionalWiki Anthem? 06:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yup, a TrashingallWiki anthem! It would be a very lumenating experience for the lumens of this Wiggy. Especially eir. 06:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Goonie. I now have "My God can beat up your God/Your God can suck on my rod" running through my head - David Gerard (talk) 14:26, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No problems, DG. 04:49, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

A message from the president of the Pat-On-The-Back Society
Huge, personal pat on the back for this edit. Well said. 04:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I almost fixed my typo, but now I think "not" reads better than "no". Thanks, Spunky.  04:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No probs, Huwman. 04:57, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

But it was FUNNY
Awww... you're no fun. :P I'm starting my own wiki, where I can be super snarky, and retardedly stupid all the time...

...

Ok, I'm back, no one was contributing, and it sucked. -- 04:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Hehe :) 04:38, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Cheers!!!
As of 8 hours from now, I'm out of town and away from this place for a while. While I'm gone, please enjoy a song I'd like to dedicate to Ed Poor. 07:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Mmmm that is special. Enjoy your vacation!  07:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Me and an ass?
No way. How could you say something like that? I am actually wonderful, I'm exciting, I look beautiful, I have lot of class, I am truly impressive - an ass is none of that. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 08:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Did I say something that assed you? Perhaps methinks a donkey?  Or a burro?  Or a burrito?  08:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * You clearly are an ass, writing such boring comments that I have nothing funny to answer. --Idiot number 59 (talk) 08:35, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Human Speakers
I didn't realise you actually built speakers, I always assumed you were just an on seller. 11:41, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Meaning you never went to my website until 🇰🇪 decided to try to destroy my business along with Homosexuality, Atheism, something beginning with T, and Evolution on the innertubes? I have had customers in both the antipodean nations, by the way.  03:18, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I have never read it in detail before, no. Surveying your prices though I don't think you are going to have another one in me any time soon, custom made speakers are a little pricey for my meagre student salary. Alas, I am going to have to go with the cheap china made plastic ones I was looking at the other day until I get a real job. 04:06, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * When I was your age I couldn't afford my prices, either (which are reasonable for the quality of the goods). But what I did was buy random stuff from surplus houses, build my own boxes, etc. Built lots of random crappy and not-so-crappy speakers, amplifiers, and even sort-of a turntable.   04:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Lumeniki
It's defenses are down! ATTACK!!!!! 02:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * There. Lumeniki now also has enough goat. 03:01, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

WP links
do you care about User:Wpbot/wplist anymore? tmtoulouse 17:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I care about the issue, but had forgotten about the botlist... hmmmm... 18:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Complete ass
Don't be such a fucking wank. AceX-102 06:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * In which of many ways I could be such a wank? 07:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Because you are a furious masturbator. AceX-102 08:44, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Stop feeding the troll
Every time you chastise someone for trying to stop the troll, the troll orgasms. Unless your anti-trolling tactic is to get the troll's keyboard too sticky to type with, stop supporting a troll over a good user. It's no wonder he keeps coming back. EddyP (talk) 12:20, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Seriously. I get the fear of banning people for no reason, but MC is obviously a worthless troll.  I really do not understand...   12:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Only reason I can think of is Human likes having the trolls around. It was pretty much the same with TK.  Not exactly an encouraging thing for new users when they show up and RC and the Saloon Bar are full of troll shit with "Human Approved" stamped on it. --Kels (talk) 12:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Only being here for ~3 months, I can vouch for this.  13:01, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


 * There are excellent and logical reasons why "blatant griefers welcomed and protected" follows logically from the wiki mission statement and indeed the prospective foundation objectives, and why both of those would collapse utterly without protecting griefers and penalising those they're griefing. I have no idea what on earth those reasons could be, but I am fully confident a detailed explanation for the less perceptive of us is forthcoming - David Gerard (talk) 16:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


 * It's probably not useful to throw around "OH MY GOD YOU'RE TK", it's the local value of Hitler - David Gerard (talk) 14:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Never said anyone was. But it was a similar situation with Certain People™ unblocking him, encouraging continued trolling, etc. --Kels (talk) 19:49, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * David, seriously, why don't you go back to wikipedia? You are not funny, you alienate people, and you refuse to embrace the traditions and rules of this site. I just don't get it. 86.40.111.211 (talk) 17:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, exactly. You've only been here 3 months. And you still don't get this site. I suspect you never will. 86.40.111.211 (talk) 13:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah. You've been banned for 2 months.  And still don't get it that you're a worthless piece of shit.  I suspect you never will, cock breath.

13:09, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


 * What does this have to do with MC? Last I remember I was being critical of DG for blocking occasionaluse for getting into a "fuck off" war of words with Toast?  And to the OP, weren't you the guy who wanted to install checkuser?  Why don't we just defer all user management issues to the eminent DG, since he seems to know exactly who should be binned, blocked, and/or silenced?  20:49, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * When did I want to install checkuser? EddyP (talk) 20:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry, it was rangeblocks you were asking for.   21:46, 7 August 2010 (UTC)