User talk:Jeffsims

You can't remove most of the article content. —ClickerClock (talk) 09:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Vandal Bin
Enjoy the vandal bin!

Basically it means you only get one edit per thirty minutes. Ok, you want to talk about it? —ClickerClock (talk) 09:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Shit, my bad. Here I thought the whole premise was intelligent rational thought, not collaborative un-sourced fact less hypocritical self defeating drivel! Honest mistake I guess, just trying to toss in a little common sense for good measure! It's clear what the agenda here is however, real interest in science recognizes that the true majority of theories are wrong, and as such are open to criticism. You want to shut down any information that doesn't "fit the bill", "tow the line" or "push the agenda", so you'll never be open to learning any real rational truths. Sometimes you have to stick your foot in your mouth, and realize that an entire article that repeatedly contradicts itself in it's presentation of "facts" about pre-existing microbiological growth being a supportive argument to spontaneous development of life simply ignored by the proponents of actual evidence, is just ignorant. Your loss I guess. People who speak the most truth, get the most resistance. Go ahead and ban me to prove your ignorance.

PS, clocks don't "click". They operate on fine tuned movement of carefully crafted specific gear ratios, or the specific frequency producing semiconductor properties of crystals with an introduced electric charge. 09:56, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Have you ever considered you might be wrong? Have you actually looked at the textbooks? Have you ever sat a class about evolution? You are not Galileo Galilei. Have you tried kindness? Have you considered that the people you argue with online may actually have studied this? Science is self-correcting and it abandoned creationism a long time ago. —ClickerClock (talk) 10:15, 16 December 2017 (UTC)