Thread:User talk:Reckless Noise Symphony/Attack pages allowed?

I've replied to you on my talk page but though I should reply here. That's simply an attack page. On Wikipedia we have strict policies on biographies, anything contentious, praise or criticism, with no reliable sources can be and should be deleted. You even reverted some clarification. Is that page an example of the standard allowed here? I'm really confused. Why replace all the attacks without any discussion? Wouldn't it be more sensible to discuss what should be changed? On Wikipedia, your action would be seen as endorsing the content. I don't know you, perhaps you think the article is appropriate as it stands. Ah, yellow message, ok, thanks very much, but wouldn't it be fairer to me to go back to my version and discuss what is either wrong with the text in my version and /or what should be replaced that I removed? Yes, I know about conflict of interest, but I had hoped your policies weren't that different from ours about attack pages.