User talk:Occum's Razor Burn

Hey there, welcome to RationalWiki! -Ĭ₠ŴΣĐĝё 14:57, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Pull up a goat and relax. Get to work!--PalMD-yada yada 15:00, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Or don't work at all. They haven't thrown me out for no useful contributions yet. MyaR 17:28, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
 * And we might just change our minds on that yet. Let's see your writing plan! *bangs the table*    Ouch. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 17:37, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Oops. I've now done so, here. Please provide feedback. MyaR 17:46, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
 * I'm afraid 92% not-unfunny isn't enough for scientific certainty; we'll have to assume that all your edits are unfunny, I think. --jtl talk 17:50, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
 * But, but I just corrected TK's spelling of 'ho'. That must count as not-unfunny. MyaR 17:53, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Well, I'll say this: it probably doesn't not count as not unfunny. --jtl talk 17:56, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
 * It seems a little harsh to assume 100% unfunniness under those circumstances. After all, we can all have a bad day from time to time. Maybe if we could achieve an average of 96.65% not-unfunnyness, that would be acceptable? -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 18:26, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
 * I propose we aim for 99.44% purely not-unfunniness. MyaR 18:37, 19 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Sounds great! Make it so. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 18:48, 19 June 2007 (CDT)