RationalWiki:Chicken coop/Archive88

__NOINDEX__

Oxyaena, D, and EK (+Pbfreespace3?)
(I am particularly interested in the opinions of the first four) I want a response from you guys, who have had your identities confirmed, before this is closed. I just received a creepy/threatening message from "(redacted)" (which I believe to be User:D, however I have the full header in case he denies it and can send an abuse report to the broadband ISP if no one wants to take credit for it since the sender obviously wants me to believe that D is responsible, which would be impersonation if it is not him). D has blocked accounts that were not mine with comments insinuating I was responsible, as have User:Oxyaena and User:EK. If you look at Oxyaena's block actions, you can see that he has threatened off-wiki action against me (for things I didn't even do) and has attempted to dox me by claiming that I live in Pensacola, Florida. This is in addition to Oxyaena, D, and EK blocking things that are obviously not me, including (redacted) of course these could be proxies, but man, every free proxy I've ever tried in recent years is blocked here, and if I were inclined to spend money, I would spend it on burner phones that are truly anonymous, not residential proxies that are not. Based on his known activities on Wikipedia (he has talked about it here, so it's not dox to mention it), I suspect D is engaged in sockpuppetry here, and behavioral similarities leads me to believe that at least Oxyaena is a sockpuppet of D. In fact, the whole lot of them (including EK) could be socks of User:Pbfreespace3, who ended up getting cooped by User:Owlman for this same flavor of reckless sleuthing shenanigans in 2016, and who has been in trouble at Wikipedia just like D. Thinking about this, D and Oxyaena have been suspiciously interested in PB3, and Oxyaena is suspiciously defensive of User:-Mona-, who PB3 was friends with on here. Regardless of whether they are sockpuppets, I propose that Oxyaena and D be stripped of tech status and be placed in sysoprevoke due to repeated abuse of the tools, Pbfreespace3 be returned to sysoprevoke the same way -Mona- was, since Oxyaena unilaterally removed him from it without mod approval, and EK get slapped with a wet trout, assuming good faith until more hard evidence is gathered against her. I am going to add, this is not the only thing Oxyaena has done wrong; there is a pattern of poor decisions here, as evidenced by the fact that Lefty Green Mario recently had to tell him "dude, you need to exercise more discretion with your blocks" Silver Belle (talk) 19:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC) I am also going to add, my "ban" is for supposedly doxxing someone who came to my defense, and at least one person feeling that it was not dox. A bunch of accounts which may be socks of D screamed "BAN HIM" and the case was quick closed. I would prefer you leave User:Public School Girl out of this moving forward as she is done here, but personally, I think this is all an attempt to BBQ me for blocking D on Conservapedia. Silver Belle (talk) 19:43, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Abusive email (ps, I do not wish for this news article allegedly about me or other off-wiki facts about me to be discussed here)
From: (redacted) To: (redacted) Sent: (redacted) Hi (redacted)

I'm from RationalWiki and I recently researched your record after your recent RationalWiki and Wikipedia postings and discussion of them on Discord. I found this news article (redacted) which is disturbing in how it fits my impression of your recent activity.

I am telling you to stop editing on RationalWiki. I don't care if you find it funny, that isn't an excuse.

If you have anything to say about this just reply to me by return or on Conservapedia.

kthx &mdash; Unsigned, by: Silver Belle / talk / contribs


 * Silver Belle, since you are now effectively admitting to being User:Conspirate, you were not actually banned for doxxing. You were banned for ban evasion from admitting to being a sock of a banned account. It was my view that you did in fact dox Public School Girl, but that was not why that account was banned. Bongolian (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * What banned account? WWW was not "banned" at that time, it was blocked, and I used a sock to start a coop case. Socking is not against the rules here, and for that matter, neither is block evasion. Silver Belle (talk) 20:02, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You're paranoid, I`m in no way a sock of D, and neither is EK. Don't think we aren't aware of what you've done, (redacted). — Oxyaena   Harass  20:34, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 1. What I have done is not what is primarily being discussed here, what you have done is. 2. I don't even know what you are talking about, (redacted) (two can play that game). Silver Belle (talk) 20:36, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


 * You really think I`m D? Cute. — Oxyaena   Harass  20:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * (redacted) you're a fucking disgrace, and are the exact opposite of the (redacted) you claim to be. — Oxyaena   Harass  20:41, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It doesn't really matter, because attempting to dox me by talking about employers in (redacted) (shows how much you really know...) along with your persistent heavy handed use of the tools and your unilateral removal of sysoprevoke from accounts without mod approval is enough in itself to sanction you. As I said, there's not really a policy against socking here, but it's useful to point out the possibility as of course known a sockmaster is going to try to game the system in this case using socks. Silver Belle (talk) 20:43, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * (redacted dox)
 * Again, you're pathetic. You think I`m D? Grow up, I am no sockmaster. You're a disgrace and I honestly fear for PBS' safety knowing your track record, and ban evasion is against the rules here. — Oxyaena   Harass  20:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * And those "threats" were when I was off my meds, you deliberately were provoking me. You're (redacted) being, you fucking stalker cyber-harasser piece of shit. — Oxyaena   Harass  20:46, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually... It's not against the rules to try to evade a ban. It's against the rules if you get caught. (Or start up a bunch of drama including bitching about your ban.) 20:48, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * And I am not really bitching about the ban, I am bitching because Oxyaena just posted dox (which I removed), and him trying to tie a bunch of crap to my real life identity (redacted) and start conspiracy theories. That stops immediately. Silver Belle (talk) 20:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Her, and I know this was you, (redacted), everything. Grow up, you're (redacted) and just barely out of high school, you have a bizarre fetish with cheerleaders (redacted) and you (redacted). — Oxyaena   Harass  20:53, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You should be in jail, (redacted) — Oxyaena   Harass  20:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

D AND EK same person socking on this Wiki and Discord
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:D https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:EK

The above two accounts are the same person, he has since admitted it. D also pretends to be a female (EK) on discord, several forums and on fake emails. If someone merely complains and points this out, he rev-dels the edits, claiming inaccurately he has been "doxxed". Why is D pretending to be a female? He has an alternative personality disorder. Multiple people in this chicken coop have complained about it. This sort of behaviour should not be tolerated here. AirWick (talk) 09:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Of course I must be insane, that automatically makes whatever you did okay. And of course it must be okay to doxx people if they don't exist. Also even if this was true, since sockpuppets are literally allowed on this wiki it doesn't actually matter. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 10:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * D must really be bored, making accounts to attack himself so he can claim it is a "Morris sock." Unless this is our favorite Muslim man, who also says D is engaged in sockpuppetry. Thing is, socking isn't really against the rules here. It's the abusive actions of D and his socks that are worthy of action. Glade (talk) 11:09, 2 June 2019 (UTC)