User talk:W.F. Tucker

Hi, and welcome to RationalWiki. I saw your comment after you created Mr. Atheist‎. You're fine. You put effort in the article, which matters more than the initial length and details, and it doesn't seem to fail our YouTube notability we established around a year ago. Doesn't matter too much if you can't get every detail in, but if you need to start an article and ends up being way too short, you should go to draftspace (i.e. create an article called Draft:Newpage) and then work in it as you please. 02:58, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Sysop
10:13, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Boy's Life
See our help page for making side-by-side pages: RationalWiki:Side-by-side. This will improve legibility of the page that you're working on. Bongolian (talk) 01:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Goat
What brings you to the Hall of Goats? — Oxyaena   Harass  03:00, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I thought I could come help make the world even a bit more of a rational and humanistic place. W.F. Tucker (talk) 04:18, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Block policy
Hey there!

Just for your awareness, we try to avoid making initial blocks too long for IP addresses, since they tend to be a lot more fluid than actual usernames and logins. They generally lose interest (or find a new proxy) pretty quickly anywho, and it doesn't take long to extend the block if they do come back.

There is a blocking policy currently in place with listed durations, but they're, in the words of Captain Hector Barbossa, "more what you'd call  'guidelines'  than actual rules." Especially when certain notorious vandals/ban evaders are involved.

Cheers, matey! ℕoir LeSable (talk) 17:26, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

ALL HAIL THE ADORABLE MOUNTAIN LIONS! THEY ARE THE MOST SACRED OF ANY ANIMALS!
Secret doors are the BEST KIND!!!!! W.F. Tucker (talk) 04:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * All hail the adorable mountain lions and our new AI overlords. ta 11:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Uh, yeah, that recent behavior of yours should stop, especially with deleting your own talk page. I've put you into sysoprevoke. You remain banned, but feel free to drop a message on your talk page if there's any misunderstanding. 05:21, 16 June 2019 (UTC)


 * I did not vandalize anything. It was all in my userspace. Why would you care about some anti-gun control, pro-consensual-prostitution, anti-useless-government-agency, anti-traffic-safety-law, anti-copyright, anti-forced-environmentalism, anti-tax HORRIBLE MONSTER's talk page anyway?
 * Whatever. It's your site. Do what you want with it.
 * Regardless, your leftist debaters heavily offended me last night on Discord, and quite frankly much of the site offends me.
 * You people should get off your high horse and stop trying to control everyone and exclude everyone who doesn't agree with your "INERRANT VIEWS" on why gun bans would actually do jack shit...for instance. You think you're the best thing ever created. You don't want equality. You're just as power hungry as the right, if not more.
 * You may take my gun, but only over my dead body. You may take my right to say whatever the fuck I want, whenever I want, but only over my dead body. You may take my right to do whatever the fuck I want to my own body, but only over my dead body!
 * You people have your right to make ableist memes about me. You have your right to exclude me from your site (not that I care because I won't be coming back). Furthermore, my friends and I have our right to completely debunk all of your insane government-babysitter views, and to debunk pseudoscience and organized religion better without you. The truly rational wiki is coming soon. Pro Libertas!!! W.F. Tucker (talk) 01:01, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * What the fuck are you talking about? You just flew off the handle out of nowhere and started yelling about mountain lions while deleting stuff. Seriously, are you on a bender? None of your rant makes any sense outside of the possibility that you discovered that, shocker, this sites views don't line up with your own 100% (I was disappointed to discover that too, but I got over it). Honestly, just communicate and explain what the everloving fuck has gotten you worked up. 03:27, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Are you drunk? 04:36, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe... — Oxyaena   Harass  05:03, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ...they are drunk. — Oxyaena   Harass  07:09, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It would appear that he spoke to Dev. Complete loss of function occurred shortly thereafter. :O 09:59, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * See, that "they" threw me off again. 19:28, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * LMAO.
 * It was supposed to lol. — Oxyaena   Harass  19:45, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Personally, I'm partial to bobcats and lynxes, but that's just me. Feline (talk) 22:09, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Talkpage access
Yeah no. — Oxyaena   Harass  03:26, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

My goodbye message to this very nice, sweet, loving, accepting, and humble community of totalitarians open-minded "liberals"!
cxNUKUzENWw

W.F. Tucker (talk) 21:29, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Stay out the Discord servers too. 21:35, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Request for unban
On Discord, I've seen your post shared requesting for an unban. You're not getting it, especially since you seem to blame people who gave you the tools for your initial edits rather than your own behavior. Please leave. 19:42, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * And also you can rereg, whatever, and you've probably done so, but one misstep and you're out. 19:50, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

A heartfelt apology
W.F. Tucker (aka PseudoSkull) here. I must apologize for disrupting this wiki and Discord server with hateful rambling and vandalism after ragequitting due to political differences with some of RationalWiki's users and articles. I still stand by my entire libertarian minarchist ideology, and I still disagree with many common beliefs here on how governments should operate, but I think that my actions here have actually violated libertarian principles and "antiodian" (anti-hatred) principles that I hold dear, and thinking back on that truly hurts me. To make change to society for the better (by encouraging the decrease in the size and influence of our government on the people) should never involve hatred, rage, or violation of one's own core libertarian beliefs (for instance violating the non-aggression principle, by committing unwelcome attacks on this community). Know that I believe in libertarianism because I genuinely believe that equal liberty for all possible human beings is what will be best for all of us, with no exception, and my recent actions here absolutely did not show the beauty of what liberty really is.

Probably the reason that I reacted so fiercely to criticism in the Discord debates is because I had been wallowing around in libertarian (and atheist) echochambers for so long, so I wasn't used to being in such a conversation with people whose viewpoints differed from mine so significantly. I am looking to change that; I am including myself in more circles. Skepticism in all forms should absolutely be welcome, and everyone, libertarians included, should learn to take a punch once in a while, which I have clearly failed to do here.

It is also against libertarian philosophy to be close-minded and trapped away from other philosophical views, as I've done by staying locked away in echochambers, and by having mostly libertarian-only atheist-only friends. If you still think I should remain banned, so be it. But if you want to allow me to engage in respectful debates in the future, or just to share my political thoughts whether or not they differ from your own, I would not abuse that privilege once again. NightSkepticState (talk) 00:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)