RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Draft:MGTOW TV

Draft:MGTOW TV | Result: Nuked like Hiroshima

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete

 * 1) -- Goatspeed.  06:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) Self-promo draft that runs directly contrary to our mission. Nuke it from orbit I say.  13:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 3) Yeah, this seems like self-promo crap. 17:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 4) It's a load of shit. They can make an essay or something if they really want to. Twodots (talk) 18:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Merge/redirect

 * 1) Hopelessly tiny stub; started as a rather transparent attempt at self-promotion by two drive-by miggies who have "channels" on this irrelevant alt-tech hate site, and who have recently been spamming our site with stupid whitewashy stubs and then whining when we refuse to let them turn this site into yet another MGTOW playground, just like AoT did. This can easily just be cut-pasted into and redirected to our existing MGTOW article; there isn't much to talk about, as the topic isn't notable enough. -- Goatspeed. 06:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) I propose merging this into MGTOW. A general paragraph called "Alt-tech hugboxes" or something similar could easily be added there with a mention of this webshite using the content of the draft article. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 15:16, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Goat

 * Who cares, it's in draft space-Hastur! (talk) 07:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hopelessly tiny stubs originally created as self-promotion in draftspace are still hopelessly tiny stubs originally created as self-promotion. We have never treated our draftspace as a clone of the essayspace, where the pages must be left untouched by the mob unless they're really annoying; their being in draftspace hasn't stopped us from voting to either nuke or move-and-redirect similarly pointless drafts lately, and we don't need these drive-by MGTOWs shitting on our site. -- Goatspeed. 07:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Unless draft space is indexed I don't see a reason why we need to care-Hastur! (talk) 07:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Because they are still articles speaking in our voice. Even if they're stubs, they're not clearly delineated as the work of a single editor, but rather the product of our community because anyone can edit Drafts (userspace Drafts are as a result more free form on this manner since they're clearly the users own product). The RationalWiki voice is supposed to be missional, and this article runs against that notion, even if it's in draftspace. It not being indexed by Google doesn't mean it's not hurting our image. 13:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Articles in Draftspace are not technically official RW articles yet. That sort of the point of Draftspace. 17:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)