RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Hurricane Sandy

Hurricane Sandy | Result: Keep

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete
Not very good (kinda short) and considering how we only have one other hurricane article, it is not very necessary. Gale5050 (talk) 18:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC) Moving to merge. Gale5050 (talk) 20:14, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Not missional enough to justify its quality or vice versa, created in 2013 so little hope of improvement. Christopher (talk) 19:18, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) I find the humor amusing enough to keep and preserve as a bit of RW history. There was some crankery involved in this, I think it should stay based on it being perfectly missional and certainly notable enough. I might keep a mirror of this in my userspace if this deletion fails on these reasons alone. Article does not apepar to have major outstanding issues either. I say keep it. Techpriest (talk) 19:55, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) I don't see the need for RW to go about on a deletion frenzy. UShistoryanalyzer (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) Bongolian (talk) 20:51, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 4) What an enjoyable sight!-Flandres (talk) 22:10, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 5) It can stay. April 22:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 6) It's fine. Brought out bigots, is an illustrative example of why climate change deniers are scum of the planet, yeah.  22:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 7) Very missional subject.  22:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Merge/redirect

 * 1) There is some funny content, but not enough to be stand alone. It can be merged into the 2012 election article, the Obama article and maybe the mitt Romney article if appropriate.Gale5050 (talk) 20:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Goat

 * Before someone describes how a hurricane with 234 deaths (probably more) and nearly $70 billion that had political effects isn't missional - why don't we have one on Hurricane Maria? In addition, it is terribly short and those two things make it not really necessary and deletable. Gale5050 (talk) 19:18, 18 June 2021 (UTC)