User talk:101.182.39.228

You are not being suppDespite Your comment is still available in the talk page history. Click on the revision with your edits and just pretend that's the current revision or something. Keep in mind, it's not acceptable to inject new comments right in the middle of a weeks-old comment string, and also sign with four ~ so at least your addition doesn't look sloppy and maybe we will take your comment slightly more seriously. Maybe also not resort to trite cliche arguments of censorship and left wing agendas and irrationality that is either going to be ignored or be given a snide remark too. 04:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Point taken. Though I have no clue why I was accused of providing links to twitter nazis. There were no links in my comments. Nor do I support nazism or racism. 101.182.39.228 (talk) 04:46, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why that was mentioned either. We don't have CheckUser, so it's not like we can speculate who is who, and I would rather people not do that. Despite our differences, you do seem to respond well to at least the formatting criticism I made and my general annoyance, so thanks for that. 04:51, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Your IP range has been used by a troll in the past. If you are not them then I apologise. 13:16, 23 October 2018 (UTC)


 * There's a vandal on racialism-talk named Michael Coombs who has been fooling around there on countless IPs since 2013. He's most the other IPs on that talk page; I know you're not Coombs, but an admin probably confused you.GreenSalad (talk) 16:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * You suspect that all those IPs are Coombs, you don't have evidence to back up that suspicion. 16:40, 23 October 2018 (UTC)