User talk:Nuthin but the truth

Hi, if you're going to rewrite the PoV of an article, take it up on the talk page first. Cheers. Тy rannis 12:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, don't copy wholesale from Wikipedia. PongoOrangutans are sceptical 13:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Also
RW is not an encyclopedia ArchieGoodwin (talk) 14:28, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Nothing was changed on the POV simply information on the ICOC. Your cover page on Rational Wiki says "we welcome and encourage those who disagree with us." Can you abide by that or only publish one POV? Nuthin but the truth (talk) 15:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * "We welcome and encourage those who disagree with us" does not mean that we welcome them to come and change our RationalWiki:SPOV or the skeptically-slanted tone of our articles. But it means that if you disagree with our POV on a given topic or that like, we won't banish you outright if you come and debate that content and POV with us. Many a good article here, Cryonics comes to mind, were made such good quality because someone who disagreed with us showed up, debated with us on the article's talkpage, corrected us on some of our biases vs. reality, and then worked with us on how to best make a good article while sticking to RationalWiki's skeptical perspective on things. 15:54, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * As an addendtum, I'd like to add that I added my comment as an outsider to the situation at hand, so if you feel it applies to a certain situation you are involved in, keep in mind it was just a general respone to your comment above it. 15:56, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * As Pongo mentioned above, your change was a slab copy from the Wikipedia article. That is not how RationalWiki works. 16:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)