Talk:Wiki

Wikifoundry
Would it also be appropriate to add Wikifoundry to this caregory being as it aims to be a wiki host aimed towards users for building their own websites similar to those seen on Wikia/Fandom? DonutBandit (talk) 06:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Not sure, but we don't have Miraheze listed either. 09:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Commupedia.
The wiki so tiny that the main page consists of vandalism. https://commupedia.fandom.com/wiki/Commupedia_Wiki 04:44, 1 June 2019‎ 174.93.39.118
 * Has vanished since the above remark was made - 'Wikia/fandom Central' delete such wikis: This may be its successor but is hopelessly small and needs some help with the main page..
 * is in (I think from the accents confetti) Vietnamese
 * I used the fossil record to add poster and timestamp for the above comment. Anna Livia (talk) 21:27, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Pseudosciencia (Pseudoscience Wiki)
I came across this Spanish-language skeptic wiki when I was looking up "La Guerra Contra Navidad". While I can only understand a few sentences of what is written there (as my Spanish isn't exactly the best), I think it could potentially be worth mentioning here. From what was on there that I could understand, its mission and interests are very similar to ours. Here is the link to their main, non-Wikia site: -- Goatspeed.  06:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Liberapedia has more editors now than before
https://liberapedia.wikia.org/wiki/Special:Log It doesn't seem like its just Proxima Centauri now.BeardOfZeus (talk) 02:48, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

ProleWiki
They're obscure, but so are most of the wikis on this page. Do we remove the section entirely because of the motivation behind its addition or just edit it? Christopher (talk) 18:50, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I say edit it. The complaints about Prolewiki's support for China is an extremely subjective criticism and clearly, it comes from...Wisconcom.--A p r i l Chat? 18:52, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The motivation does cast that particular edit in doubt but maybe just having it be listed alongside other wikis is that one compromise we can do I guess. 18:54, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I deleted a bunch of rambling paragraphs. What do you all think of the section now?--A p r i l Chat? 18:58, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * China isn't socialist. Vee (talk) 19:11, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Suit yourself. Again you can add whatever you want there--A p r i l Chat? 19:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

ProleWiki, relative to the other examples documented here, is notable to the extent that it warrents its own section. Being critical of this site for its extreme and uncritical support for the People's Republic of China, including in the aspect of how ProleWiki considers it to be "Socialist", is not "subjective". The only ideological groupings which still maintain that modern China is Socialist are small pseudo-Marxist (revisionist) circles. These claims are made by, a clearly pro-China "Marxist", whose edits (or rather, clear whitewashing) of ProleWiki I have reverted. Wisconcom 18:33, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
 * For someone who has "pressing matters" in his life with which he must deal, he is rather preoccupied with incessantly attending to matters which are not at all pressing, is he not?--A <font color="Pink">p <font color="EBECF0">r <font color="Pink">i <font color="55CDFC">l Chat? 03:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * That is not a counter-argument. I will be fully off this Liberal cesspool in haste. Wisconcom 03:29, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Go on then. Off you pop. 18:20, 25 December 2022 (UTC)