Talk:QED

Should this page maybe be deleted? It's really nothing more than a disambiguation page right now, with neither concept having an article on their own. What say ye? -Smyth 12:30, 24 September 2007 (EDT)


 * Nar, leave it as disambi .... (what a word!) Susan  talk to me  12:55, 24 September 2007 (EDT)
 * ps Both pages do exist Susan  talk to me
 * Maybee I do "WQED" which is a PBS station in Pgh (pittsburgh) PA.CЯacke ® 13:00, 24 September 2007 (EDT)

Second thoughts: blow it up! Susan talk to me  13:01, 24 September 2007 (EDT)
 * Well, I'm not sure I have the powa to blow it up, so I made a little adjustment. What do you think, should it just maybe be made into a redirect?  Maybe I'm just being dense, but I can't seem to find an article on quantum electrodynamics. -Smyth 15:26, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
 * Awesome first disambig page! QED, indeed!  We rulzorz! human  19:03, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

Ah, now I discover the Qed link above is a redirect to a redlink. Still, we could have an article on it. Anwyay! We need a template for disambiguation pages that is easy to type and remember, and includes the template so they don't get tagged by stubbot. The da template does not need any text, although a small box would probably be nice. I suppose I have now cut my work out for me... human  19:07, 16 October 2007 (EDT)
 * Whenever one us gets aroudn to writing QED (the other one), this should go back to being a fork. For now, I'm fine with the redirect. human  18:12, 29 November 2007 (EST)