User talk:Tuxer

I don't agree with your opposition to hate speech laws, but everyone's entitled to their own opinion. Welcome! 142.124.55.236 (talk) 00:51, 7 September 42015 AQD (UTC)

Autopatrolled
17:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Wizard
--Don Juan (talk) 01:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you!
Since Rational Wiki does not have a "thank you" button, unlike Wikipedia, I shall have to do this the old-fashioned way. Thank you for that correction to Bernie Sanders. I changed "compared" to "described" but forgot about what came after. Nerd (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the work on AOC
Thanks for adding the "wingnut obsession" section to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. It's the source of virtually all her notoriety, for better and worse, and it was astonishing that we had no mention of it up until now.--Fire Me Boy (talk) 04:42, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Anarchism page
Your removal of an entire sourced section in favour of a biased comment sourced to communist propaganda was not an improvement. If you have any questions lmk. EK (talk) 14:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Hey
can you help out on the mod noticeboard and anarchism talk page, please? — Oxyaena Harass  15:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Nominated
--RWRW (talk) 11:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Uh hey, try to be more careful sharing WIGO links
I found two of them that didn't support the summary you included. The slate article you shared earlier actually counters your point pretty early on too, as the article deemed your summary as similar to "One common response to these kinds of stories from left-wing corners of Twitter is that, if employers are having trouble hiring workers, they should simply raise pay. But that’s much easier snarked about than done[...]". I'm not saying this article is correct and that suggestion is wrong or misguided, but you shouldn't write summaries of articles that aren't consistent with the articles you share. 19:06, 25 April 2021 (UTC)