Template talk:Geologic periods

That brown is a little difficult to read the title against. Also, the title of the template shouldn't be capitalized, really (small "p").  ħ uman  17:08, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * Sorry, I didn't realise the naming convention. Thanks for improving the template! KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 18:15, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * No big deal, it's not very obvious. Do you want to move it and fix the, what, three places it's used?  Oh, and you're welcome, anytime. PS, any chance you might get some stubs started so those links turn blue?  (I might, but I'd just write gibberish...)  ħ uman  19:27, 10 February 2009 (EST)
 * I had a go, but it's anyone's guess as to whether or not they're an improvement on gibberish. ;) KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 10:58, 11 February 2009 (EST)
 * Hehe, well, getting them started helps a lot, I'm sure they'll get improved over time. Thanks!  ħ uman  13:59, 11 February 2009 (EST)

ignorant of biology, but...
Should this include/be broken into the larger "Eras" or are those not used very much any more? Paleozoic, Cenezoic and I don't know the third.-- 14:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * That's certainly an option, although it would require clever coding that I can't do.KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 22:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)