Talk:Skunk ape

Delete
It does seem a bit obscure, but maybe worth keeping if someone fancies expanding it a little. The Wikipedia article is also pretty light on details. -- 22:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It's potentially a good article. But what is here now should just be a footnote in bigfoot. -- 22:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I vote keep for now. -- 22:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * How about I expand Cryptozoology to some examples, including this hairy chap? 22:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Sounds good! That is a good article. -- 22:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool. I'll do that tomorrow, and I suppose thus existing page could become a redirect. 22:29, 4 March 2010 (UTC)