User talk:Antifly

Ignore that soulless automaton welcome above, Antifly. I welcome you warmly and wholeheartedly. Welcome to the ! 12:40, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Am I still welcome to a goat?Antifly 15:53, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
 * As long as your gentle. 15:59, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
 * His gentle what? ThunderkatzHo! 15:59, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
 * His Gentle Shepherd. -- AKjeldsen Potential fundamentalist! 16:17, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Err ... you wouldn't like to stick something on your user page would you? Stop those red links on Recent changes. Well spotted on the Dominic Bugler one - wonder if it is him or if he's just an admirer - the sycophancy rings true? 17:33, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Yah I have been meaning to for a while now...
 * On the Bugler thing, it's probably just a coincidence, but it was too eerie not to share!--Antifly 18:33, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
 * It'd be fun to refer to him as Dominic though, wouldn't it? 18:44, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
 * He probably wouldn't mind if we called him "Dom." Less syllables, and other connotations as well...--Antifly 18:49, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
 * No: Andy's the Dom - he's the sub 18:59, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Good point.--Antifly 19:12, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

You can haz demotion
Hurray!!! You now sysop. $\approx$$\pi$ Mowse 19:34, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
 * Sweet. I can feel the power coursing through my veins...--Antifly 16:16, 25 September 2008 (EDT)

Gerbil
Apparently it has been known for (male) persons of certain tendencies to insert a tube into the rear aperture and to then persuade a gerbil or hampster therein. This results in stimulation of the prostate and consequent arousal. 14:52, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
 * uhhhhh... wow. I thought I had more or less heard it all...-- 19:40, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I think it is an urban myth. Those little buggers have bloody sharp teeth. Генгис    20:14, 3 October 2008 (EDT)

2 things

 * 1) nice job importing the questions etc - dunno why I didn't think of that.
 * 2) have you got "make all edits minor by default" checked in your preferences? Some of your edits aint minor but are getting the m on Recent changes.  20:37, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 * Nope. I select the minor edit button when I feel that the edit is minor. I guess my judgement is slightly off...-- 21:09, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
 * I forget the minor button most of the time - I should use it more, but generally it's for corrections (spelling/typos) & minor formatting changes  and the like. If you add more than a word or two, I'd leave it out. (everyone's going to look at what everyone's done anyhow. )  21:15, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

I'm sorry for you.
I'm sorry for you that you have such a low IQ. I can't even begin to imagine what it would be like to have an average IQ, let alone an IQ of 10. However, I wish you good luck on your endeavours, and I hope you don't know what you're missing. InaVegt 15:17, 1 November 2008 (EDT)
 * lol, I didn't even realize that X=10... Rest assured that I do have an IQ greater than 10. The box is a bad attempt at humour, the code for the userbox prompts one to replace "X" with their IQ...-- 15:46, 1 November 2008 (EDT)
 * And this comment was just my bad attempt at humour. I probably should've included a :p somewhere. (I dunno what it's named, but it seems to be a law of the internet that without a tongue smiley or similar, non-blatant jokes tend to be taken for serious comments) InaVegt 15:52, 1 November 2008 (EDT)
 * No worries, I didn't take your comment to heart. For some reason I felt the need to explain my bad joke in graphic detail... in order to make it ...better...??-- 16:10, 1 November 2008 (EDT)

Psst. ..
Look here. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 17:01, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * Que?-- 17:08, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * Me. Be very, very quiet. My first parody sock. So far, so good. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 17:09, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * Not for long...-- 17:11, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * He's surviving. I'm shocked. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 17:14, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * Okay, TK reverted my talk edits. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 17:18, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * (EC) Posting your parody here = epic phail (this was you right?) -- Nx  talk 17:20, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * Hasn't reverted any of my mainspace edits. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 17:22, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * The funky thing is, I reverted something added by a sock that was blocked, and he blocked me and reverted it. Weird. --"C, U Rthe, ing. 18:58, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * (ECx2) Next time try not advertising, Teacake is always lurking. Hasn't much better to do...-- 17:23, 25 February 2009 (EST)

Retirement
Sorry to see you go, though I understand your reason.

I hope you don't really mind, I restored your sig files, deleting them makes ugly red links wherever you have commented, and there's really no need to get rid of them. Perhaps you could change the "talk" one to read "retired"? 19:42, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No worries. I am back for the mean time at least...-- 05:27, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool, I knew you'd be back so I saved your place ;) 06:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Grr
None of you can spell vauge. --Mei II 03:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a vaugery I'd not considered.-- 03:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Your rouge spellings are opauqe to me. It's grotesuqe.
 * CORRECT YOUR TECHNIUQE. --Mei II 03:26, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Support your local Mei
Good evening citizen. You have been selected for showing interest in your local Mei. Were you aware that you can show your support for the troops the Mei by sporting this userbox on your userpage? It's very pretty. This Christmas Mei will go hungry. Please help feed a hungry Mei today. ''' Play, run, feed and feel good about yourself. tm''' This message brought to you by Mei. --  = w =  00:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

MemeShock
Seriously what is your beef with that, it is humorous and the guy said it? 00:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * My beef is fairly straightforward. To say that "hate" is part of their contrived lexicon is a simple blatant lie. The whole point of that article, and the reason why we dislike "memeshock" so much, is that we think dishonesty is bad. So we shouldn't be dishonest.
 * Adding snark is entirely different. I am all for the "translations" that have been provided.
 * Here is an example, pulled from a random page: In our article birther we list Orly Taitz as a "Dr." by virtue that she hasn't presented a copy of her diploma. That is snarky, and true. We don't list Orly Taitz as claiming false credentials. We also don't list Orly Taitz as a child molester or nazi sympathizer, even though we think she is repulsive. See the difference?
 * If you want to work Mr. Raatz's ridiculous claims of persecution into the article in a snarky way, that would be great. I just think that we shouldn't be in the misrepresentation business.
 * Having scruples: sometimes it sucks.-- 01:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I have separated it from the main list for snarkification. 01:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That's a good solution. Thanks.-- 01:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Why why why?
Not another one! Acei9 21:44, 30 January 2010 (UTC)