Conservapedia talk:Moronic vandalism

Is this necessary? Could we flesh it out more if it is? Researcher 21:58, 9 November 2008 (EST)
 * It looks like little more than a low-vote WIGO entry to me... I moved it to the CP namespace for now, at least.  ħ uman  18:31, 23 November 2008 (EST)

Given the intelligence level of CP-acceptable persons does the MV status indicate a higher IQ?82.44.143.26 (talk) 18:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete
It was pointed out years ago that this is nothing more than a short list of shitty WIGOs. Convince me we need this. P-Foster (talk) 22:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It is against the rules to post moronic vandalism on WIGO@Conservapedia. 23:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * For a reason. Moving it here doesn't change that. P-Foster (talk) 23:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * delete. moronic vandalism is moronic. --Scream!! (talk) 23:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Neglected and not needed. 17:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Merge It
We should just merge it with some other CP related article about their blocking policies. Maybe Conservapedia:Block Reasons.Klaus Vos (talk) 02:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)