Malcolm Roberts

Care. Core. Cure. "Malcolm-Ieuan: Roberts., the living soul", representing a corporate entity called MALCOLM IEUAN ROBERTS was and will be an Australian Senator for Queensland for the One Nation party. He was elected to the in the 2016 election and assumed office on July 2nd, 2016. He presents the nation with the horrifying spectre of Pauline Hanson being the most grounded-in-reality elected member of the party.

Apart from talking like a huge antisemite (though he's convinced he isn't one), Roberts, a former coal mine manager, also co-founded the global warming denialist organisation actually known as the "Galileo Movement" and appears to be into sovereign citizen and freeman on the land-type pseudolaw. His personal website is innocently titled "Climate Conscious". And he really does write his name "Malcolm-Ieuan: Roberts".

Roberts also believes that section 18c of the Racial Discrimination Act 2014 needs to be repealed, so he can really get stuck into the Muzzles "talk about the real issues — tax, Islam, terrorism, the economy."

Further media coverage was sparse as he stated that "we are only doing live interviews that can't be edited" until September 2017, when the High Court threw him out of the Senate because at the time of his election he was still a dual-citizen of the United Kingdom. He was replaced by the next candidate on One Nation's 2016 preference list, Fraser Anning, who is actually worse in every way. Roberts was re-elected in 2019, having sorted out his citizenship properly this time.

Freeman/sovereign affectations
Though Roberts has specifically denied being a "sovereign citizen", he did notably send a freeman-style Affidavit of Notice of Standing and Further and Better Particulars and Proof of Claim in 2011 to Julia Gillard (or, in strawman theory form, "The Woman, Julia-Eileen: Gillard., acting as The Honourable JULIA EILEEN GILLARD"), the Prime Minister at the time, including a schedule of payments to be made to him if she attempted to enforce the carbon tax or failed to prove global warming to his satisfaction.

He also has a tendency to title letters to politicians as " LAWFUL NOTICE BY REGISTERED POST WITH DELIVERY CONFIRMATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND IN GOOD FAITH ". When critics stop debating with him over correspondence, he sends them a letter, again via registered post and with a delivery confirmation, in which he states that they have "defaulted" (much like a loan payment) on responding to him - this letter starts with the words " LAWFUL NOTICE OF DEFAULT ". He then gives them another fortnight to respond, when they don't he sends a final letter to them entitled " LAWFUL NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE, PUBLICATION AND UTTERANCE ", where he then states that he has won the argument ("By way of judgment of default you have accepted my claims to be true.").

Climate conspiracy (but totally not Jews)
Considering all life on Earth is carbon based, do you really want a carbon-constrained/carbon-free future?

As an engineer with an MBA, Roberts is confident in his understanding of the nature of evidence. He has claimed at length that climate change is an international conspiracy, furthered by international bankers and the United Nations in order to impose a socialist New World Order.

He has a habit of citing anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists, including notorious holocaust denier Eustace Mullins, and says that "international bankers aim to dumb-down children through state-controlled education". The antisemitism was too much even for Andrew Bolt, who proceeded to disassociate himself from the Galileo Movement. Roberts reiterated his United Nations claim after his election, though he denied that by the notorious dog whistle term "international bankers" he meant "Jews". After receiving emails from Roberts, biologist had to seriously ask him if he believed in a "Jewish conspiracy to take over the world", to which Roberts replied with the friend argument.

He wants the (the federal science research organisation) and the  (the federal weather service) to be investigated for their "corrupt" evidence supporting climate change. He also thinks Agenda 21 is involved.

Labouring the point
Roberts has a history of harassing climate scientists and academics, deciding in 2013 to compose reams of letters and emails to scientists' employers, copying in long lists of politicians, journalists and fellow denialists. As he puts it, referring to himself in the third person:

Several university vice-chancellors' offices subsequently told him to bugger off. He has also targeted expert witnesses in court cases who spoke in opposition to a coal mine.

Malcolm Roberts vs Brian Cox
Also in on the conspiracy is NASA, as Roberts revealed to Brian Cox on ABC TV Q&A, 15 August 2016, after Roberts said data did not exist and Cox proceeded to produce a graph of it he'd brought with him for the occasion:

Roberts claimed the data had been manipulated by multiple agencies:

Roberts then tried to say that this somehow did not constitute claiming they had conspired:

Malcolm Roberts vs Ben Cubby
In February 2013 Roberts started to write to Ben Cubby, Environment Editor for The Sydney Morning Herald and one of many reporters who Roberts sent correspondence to starting with the lines:

He demanded that Cubby "withdraw your past such claims and associated articles. If you continue making such claims and fail to retract past claims you will be knowingly misleading the public and parliament. Please stop advocating policies harming humanity and/or the environment." In response to Robert's email, Cubby wrote:

He refused to comment on all the errors in Roberts' report, but did mention that he couldn't quite fathom how Roberts found a whole raft of underwater volcanos that only Roberts seemed to know about, that his co-author was Tim Ball, not Tim Hall, as he misspelled it, and that he had in fact provided the evidence demanded and that until Roberts could ground his beliefs in reality he would consider any further emails as "amusing spam".

Roberts responded by sending an unhinged letter "by registered post with delivery confirmation" revealing that he had made an official complaint to the Fairfax board and CEO, and accusing Cubby of responding with "false derogatory comments, misrepresentations and lies", that Cubby was doing "incalculable damage" to himself and demanding a retraction. He then followed this up with a demand for a response and that "though not required to do so, I now give you a further fourteen days to rebut this notice of default. Failure to do so by Friday, April 12th, 2013 will render my claims as factual." Apparently, in Robert's mind, facts are decided on whether the one you are writing to bothers to reply to your batshit insanity. Cubby was not impressed and duly ignored Roberts, after which Roberts sent him a threatening, but legally impotent, "lawful notice of default". It seems to be a construct in Robert's own mind that if he sends a letter by registered post with a delivery receipt and demand, in what he believes to be legal language, that he get a response, then if no response is received he wins the argument.

Cubby later interviewed Roberts, and at one point Roberts voluntarily revealed that he pursues his claims "voluntarily by the way and I’ve been selling some of our own, my own family’s assets … my wife’s starting to get a bit pissed off about it, which is understandable". When Cubby pressed him to understand why he was a climate sceptic, he explained that when he was a mine manager, "I was responsible statutorily for hundreds of people’s lives at any one time. And those lives depended upon my knowledge of atmospheric gases, so my and said, “hang on, what’s going on?” when I started hearing these claims." His final correspondence to Cubby was a claim that he won his argument because he did not receive a response from Cubby.

Valuable political advice
I’d be pleased to meet with you to discuss my letter to Greg Combet. I can show you how to use the climate and tax millstone around your party's neck to reclaim the moral high ground.

Roberts' offer to show various people of much greater political stature how to "regain the moral high ground" was thoughtfully extended to several politicians in addition to Faulkner, including the aforementioned and. Sadly, none of them took the bait.

In the batch of letters harassing climate scientists, Roberts also sent copies of well-known crank tomes They Own it All (Including You) by Means of Toxic Currency by Ron ald MacDonald and Web Of Debt by alt-med woomeister (Alex Jones' favorite authors!  ) to Faulkner, among others.

In his second letter to Faulkner, Roberts emphasised the following important information:

Roberts also sent a 20-page Gish gallop to Greg Combet, in which he claims to offer up "empirical evidence" debunking climate change, i.e. asks a lot of questions, trips on almost every step of the denialist staircase and accuses Labor then-senator of having "misled her party".

On the 4th of February 2013, Roberts decided to send letters to ten prominent Australian politicians, demanding that they either "provide empirical scientific evidence and logical scientific reasoning showing human carbon dioxide controls climate" or — if unable to do so — that they promptly resign. The targets of his purge were: All remaining Senators and Members of Parliament also received copies of his 29-page report on the CSIRO/Bureau of Meteorology/international bankers/UN conspiracy, ''CSIROh! Climate of Deception? ... or First Step to Freedom?'', accompanied by a plaintive plea to repeal the carbon tax.
 * Greg Combet
 * Craig Emerson
 * Julia Gillard (then Prime Minister)
 * Greg Hunt
 * Rob Oakeshott
 * Kevin Rudd (former and future Prime Minister)
 * Malcolm Turnbull (the current Prime Minister)
 * Tony Windsor
 * Christine Milne (then Senator)
 * Penny Wong (then Senator)

Roberts' Senatorial career
Roberts says that before he decided to join the One Nation party he "grilled [Pauline Hanson] for 12 hours one day".

During his first term as Senator, Roberts made himself busy by asking chief scientist to yet again explain why human-induced carbon emissions have been rising since the start of the Industrial Age and if so, why this causes warming and thus produces climate change. He stated that he wanted it given to him "Like me &mdash; short and simple." With great patience, Dr Finkel explained climate change in as simple language as possible. Roberts had already been briefed; in early 2016 he had demanded a briefing by the CSIRO on scientific evidence of climate change, which he fairly promptly rejected with a written response in the form of a 42-page report titled "On Climate, CSIRO Lacks Empirical Proof", which he co-wrote with climate change deniers and Tim Ball. It is interesting to note that Roberts is not particularly discriminating in who he asks for evidence of climate change, because he also gave his business card to the somewhat surprised political journalist in the middle of a live interview and asked him or anyone else at the ABC to find "empirical evidence" of climate change. Cassidy responded by sending him a detailed report from the Climate Institute with all of this already published and widely disseminated data in it.

He also caused a dilemma for Hansard scribes by clucking like a chicken whilst debating a bill around the Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC), which they solved by quoting him as "bwok bwok bekerk!". Hansard now reads as:

Whilst a Senator, he also stood up for those who wolf-whistle at women, took to Twitter to ask the populace how the government should "spend $5 billion of taxpayer money currently used on green energy" (the poll overwhelmingly chose the option "Green Energy" at 86%), claimed at a Brisbane rally that "we are now becoming prey to an external force, and that is the United Nations... this abortion push is part of that anti-life agenda", proposed that the date of be changed because he believed it was related to the Australian Labor Party (it is not)  and in an ABC Lateline interview told interviewer Emma Alberici that the burqua was "an affront to ... homosexuals" because "the Islamic people throw homosexuals off the roofs of buildings".

Mr. to Senator to Mr.
Roberts was made an Australian Senator in 2016. In 2017 he went back to just a Mr. after his own party leader, Pauline Hanson, referred him to the High Court because it was unclear if he was a dual-citizen at the time he stood as a candidate for the Senate. Then-Senator Roberts appeared before an increasingly bemused judge, who found that:

During the trial, it emerged that Roberts believed that he was not a British citizen because his father, had he known, would have used his "pleasantly sarcastic" humour and teased him about it, which he apparently never did. Nevertheless, Roberts thought he had better do a spot of research anyway, and eventually sent an email to both bcabris2@britaus.net and bcabris1@britaus.net with the subject "Am I still a British citizen?". He apparently believed that he was emailing the UK Consulate in Brisbane.

Surprisingly, he never received a response, but submitted his Nomination Form for the Senate anyway, three days after which he followed up with another email to australia.enquiries@fco.gov.ukSydney (sic) stating that he hadn't heard back from anyone, but whilst he knew he wasn't a British citizen he was renouncing it anyway. His wife later realised that, despite his complete and utter confidence in his abilities as a researcher, this wasn't actually sufficient and according to Roberts "did extensive Internet searches over the next few days and eventually tracked down the UK Home Office". On the 10 September 2016 he then sent an annoyed email to the Home Office, accusing them of ignoring his previous two emails and asking for clarification whether he had any claim to British citizenship. This time the email address was to the actual Home Office, who replied and advised that in fact he probably was a British citizen and provided a form to renounce his citizenship, which he did.

In his own defence, then-Senator Roberts stated that:

In his judgement, stated that:

This is the judicial equivalent of "you are a deluded fool, I find judgement against you".