User talk:Sh1ftst0rm

Simulation argument additions
Interesting additions to the simulation argument article. Just curious, but are these potential solutions that are actually proposed by the folks who believe such a simulation is possible? I wouldn't mind some references to peruse later. - GrantC (talk) 17:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, some more sources would be nice. Zero (talk) 18:48, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, no, it was stuff I came up with =(. I tried searching through welcome guide quickly about "original research" and didn't see anything, so I thought I would just add it and see if it got reverted. I got the impression that a lot of that page was along the same lines. --Sh1ftst0rm (talk) 19:20, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Cool. From a computing standpoint your points are reasonable, so I'll leave it to other editors to figure out if it should be reverted on some other grounds. Either way, it was an interesting read, so thanks for that. - GrantC (talk) 19:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC)