RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Queer Nation

Queer Nation | Result: Deleted. If someone wants to create a new and better article about this in the future, that would be fine.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete

 * 1) This stub was created in 2013. In the last 7 years it was edited three times, the last edit made in 2015. It is extremely short and completely unreferenced. It's also not funny in any way, nor is it informative. -  Rairyu75  ( Talk ) 13:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) It's missional but it's also dated (nobody edited it in 5 years) and it has no references. Bongolian (talk) 18:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 3) Not worth keeping. 21:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 4) Even if that little paragraph were referenced, it wouldn't deserve a page of its own. It could just go on the ACT UP page. Since it's completely unreferenced, the best thing to do is to nuke it.Spud (talk) 00:17, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 5) Hopelessly tiny stub; may as well just copy-paste this into a new section in an existing article on gay rights. -- Goatspeed. 23:06, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Seems missional enough.  19:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) Flandres (talk) 19:37, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 3) Changing my vote to keep-Hastur! (talk) 21:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 4) Wikipedia article is fairly extensive, and mentions troubling incidents of outing. Could be easily improved, though I don't have much of an internal road map for the subject. Smerdis of Tlön, wekʷōm teḱsos. 21:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Goat

 * I usually vote for deletion, but if it's true they're involved in LGBT rights protests in Russia then this article could be expanded to further our mission-Hastur! (talk) 13:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * What Hastur said, minus the voting for deletion part. — Oxyaena Harass  14:19, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree with both of you that the topic is highly missional. But the fact that nobody bothered to expand this in 7 years kinda makes me think that it won't be expanded. I'm actually kinda hoping that since I nominated it for deletion one of our editors will decide to quickly adopt this little stub and upgrade it. I wanted to add it on to my list, but there is already plenty there to keep me entertained for a while. I wanna hear what the others think, but do you two think we should move it to draft space? Or maybe one of you is interested in expanding it? (wink-wink, nudge-nudge) - Rairyu75  ( Talk ) 14:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I`m barely involved with this project anymore. If someone else doesn't do it, I may consider editing it, but for now I am not interested. — Oxyaena Harass  14:35, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If somebody would like to create another article about this some time in the future, that would be fine. But it doesn't look like anything's going to happen to improve the pathetic stub we've got now. Spud (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)