RationalWiki talk:Bureaucrat guide

Nominating 'crats?
Perhaps a small procedure--a nomination and a seconding, and if no objections, then demote to 'crat? TheoryOfPractice 10:55, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * Yeah, I want MOAR POWERZ, dammit! 11:20, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * I'll second you if you nominate me, Edgerunner. And I'll buy you a Doom Bar if you ever swing by Aylesbury Totnes. Totnesmartin 11:36, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * Hell yeah! You should definitely have MOAR POWERZ.  And, of course, beer is always the best bribe (in addition to being the cause of and solution to all of life's problems).  11:44, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * Great! who shall we go and pester for 'cratship? Totnesmartin 11:52, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * ToP brought it up. He seems to be the most logical.  11:54, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * I second you and Martin's encrattening. 11:56, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * Not me! 11:53, 12 February 2009 (EST)
 * Requests put in. Now, to the off-licence... Totnesmartin 12:04, 12 February 2009 (EST)

I'll have to check back later. I'm at work and am off to a meeting. 12:06, 12 February 2009 (EST)

Special pages
11:01, 12 February 2009 (EST)

Request for help?
Wasn't sure where to put this. I'll delete it once it's dealt with. Could a Bureaucrat possibly hide the two recent IP edits to Conservapedia:Andrew Schlafly's greatest insights? Wasn't logged in... thanks. 00:15, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You don't need crat status to hide something from most, you only need help from crats if you need it hidden from other sysops here. -- 00:29, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * What is going on here, first we are hiding names and now memory-holing conversations? -  π    01:41, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I know, Irrational One. That's what I thought. 01:43, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * No one is memory-holing conversations, the revision issue is not a new debate. Tmtoulouse (talk) 01:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * And I already rolled back the deletion of this conversation. 01:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I think the deletion of the conversation was a misunderstanding. Tmtoulouse (talk) 01:46, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I didn't mean to hide this conversation, I just was pretty sure it doesn't go here. Sorry. Man, need to be more careful. 02:00, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * All is forgiven. 02:01, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

how long
do you have to be a Rationalwikian to be a bureaucrat--Thedoctor80 (talk) 17:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Long enough. 17:44, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not length that matters; it's how you use it. -- Nx  / talk 17:45, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * SCHWING!!!!! 17:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Will I be a bureaucrat soon? 07:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Not likely. ТyUser_talk:Tyrannis 12:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Why?
Did we eliminate the bureaucracy? RoninMacbeth (talk) 23:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)