User talk:EndGhost

How 'bout you discuss first, hm? --Kels 22:28, 25 November 2007 (EST)
 * Please talk about issues first before you add/subtract from it. I agree that a lot of the libertarianism article is inflammatory and designed purely for lulz at libertarians expense, but consider that as a purpose in your edits.  You're welcome to fill out a section about what libertarianism actually is, or debate us on the talk page, and I bet people would listen to you.  But please don't add/subtract w/o discussion.- 02:32, 26 November 2007 (EST)

Errr, yeah, I shouldn't have reverted that one :-)- 02:38, 26 November 2007 (EST)

You seem to have lots to contribute, why not actually pick a handle and become, you know, one of us.--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 06:48, 26 November 2007 (EST)
 * Yes, I think you'd make friends and earn respect faster if you had a "name" we could associate with you, as opposed to a number that 1. we can't remember and 2. could change on your next round of "improvements" to the site. human  12:57, 26 November 2007 (EST)

Wazzock
Does this wazzock think that we'll grow bored of reverting him & let his edits stay unchallenged? I'd block this IP but he'd pop up under a different address and claim victimisation. Susan ... miaow ...  13:37, 26 November 2007 (EST)
 * For those who may be puzzled, a definition of "wazzock" may be found here--Bobbing up 13:42, 26 November 2007 (EST)

Actually, if you blocked me it would be becuase you don't agree with me, making it an ideological block. 98.17.56.87 13:53, 26 November 2007 (EST)
 * No it wouldn't - it'd be because you won't discuss controversial edits before making them. Susan ... miaow ...  13:59, 26 November 2007 (EST)

Plea
I know I've said some of this, but please, Mr/Ms 98.17.56.87, just give yourself a quick handle...make something up, like "Fred" or something so that you're easier to work with. You do seem to have useful contribs to make, but it's really difficult to collaborate with an anon. We encourage socks, so if you are in some way "known" over here, just pick a name at random. Or not, but you'll find yourself gaining a great deal of respect if you do.--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 14:03, 26 November 2007 (EST)

Thank you, Sir/Ma'am/other! Welcome to the dollhouse!--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 14:10, 26 November 2007 (EST)


 * OK, if I HAVE to get an account here in order to get a fair share of respect then i will. But why do you always call this place a dollhouse? EndGhost 14:11, 26 November 2007 (EST)


 * My word - you want respect? That'll cost you extra! Susan  ... miaow ...  14:14, 26 November 2007 (EST)
 * No, i just wanted to get rid of all the disrespect and insults. EndGhost 14:17, 26 November 2007 (EST)

Thanks for signing in, EndGhost, and Welcome to the Dollhouse! I hope you like the goat. human  14:16, 26 November 2007 (EST)


 * Some jokes you only get when you've been around a while. And others, well we don't always know why, but they're funny all the same. [[Image:jollyfish.gif|25px]]Genghis  Marauding 15:39, 26 November 2007 (EST)

HI!
Still at it! So'm I. Susan  purrrrr ...  15:06, 28 November 2007 (EST)

Edit Warring on NWO page...
Please don't...PFoster 18:02, 28 December 2007 (EST)
 * OK, tell me why you love that dumb sentence that does nothing
 * It makes for a nice transition between the etymology of the term and the ways in which different conspiracy theorists have understood and used the term. Why do you hate it so? And "'cause it's stupid" would be a lame answer, so try to do better.PFoster 18:06, 28 December 2007 (EST)

This is going to get you blocked. Please stop. PFoster 18:18, 28 December 2007 (EST)

Libertarinism
Why? When someone just got blocked for the same old boring, tired shit? PFoster 18:28, 13 January 2008 (EST)