Talk:The Vigilant Christian/Archive1

RIPPED OFF
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgxDgbnofr0 4:09 HE RIPPED OFF RATIONALWIKI!!!!! Me smells a POE. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Amazing_Atheist
 * Either that or he is just using "Mainstream Media" when it agrees with him, and calls us "gubmint shillz" when we don't. It kind of makes it so he always wins. Just wait when he sees this article. He'll create a video calling us "brainwashed", "puppets", etc.--サトセレ (talk) 02:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Words cannot describe how hilarious that would be. Greatnecro (talk) 11:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Most of the other links he provides in the description are BS btw. I bet he'll link to that same Bullshit in his response to us, when he makes one (It's inevitable really).--サトセレ (talk) 13:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

I'm starting to feel that this page has too many sections with very little content in each (1 or 2 sentences). Perhaps we could do some merging?

I love it when these guys attack eachother.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjT2PKojSus&index=376&

Apparently the book describing the 13 bloodlines of the Illuminati is dis-info.--サトセレ (talk) 17:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

This article sucks. Here's why.

 * All it is is a mockery. It only lists the theories he believes and does nothing to debunk them. Also, his "Evolution" videos are not addressed. I suggest googling these:

https://www.google.com/search?q=the+vigilant+christian+evolution&espv=2&biw=2133&bih=1061&tbm=vid&ei=R9umVJLDOouLoQT2poD4Cg&start=0&sa=N&dpr=0.9

https://www.google.com/search?q=the+vigilant+christian+evolution&espv=2&biw=2133&bih=1061&tbm=vid&ei=R9umVJLDOouLoQT2poD4Cg&start=0&sa=N&dpr=0.9#q=the+vigilant+christian+evolution&tbm=vid&start=10

https://www.google.com/search?q=the+vigilant+christian+evolution&espv=2&biw=2133&bih=1061&tbm=vid&ei=R9umVJLDOouLoQT2poD4Cg&start=0&sa=N&dpr=0.9#q=the+vigilant+christian+evolution&tbm=vid&start=20

https://www.google.com/search?q=the+vigilant+christian+evolution&espv=2&biw=2133&bih=1061&tbm=vid&ei=R9umVJLDOouLoQT2poD4Cg&start=20&sa=N&dpr=0.9

https://www.google.com/search?q=the+vigilant+christian+evolution&espv=2&biw=2133&bih=1061&tbm=vid&ei=R9umVJLDOouLoQT2poD4Cg&start=30&sa=N&dpr=0.9

https://www.google.com/search?q=the+vigilant+christian+evolution&espv=2&biw=2133&bih=1061&tbm=vid&ei=R9umVJLDOouLoQT2poD4Cg&start=40&sa=N&dpr=0.9

Googleing "The Vigilant Christian Evolution" shows hbe made multiple videos on the subject. He talks about how "Transhumanism" is the "next step" in evolution, the history of evolution in Freemasonry, etc.

Even though I searched that, it shows videos besides evolution, like when he responds to David J. Stewart's article calling him a false teacher, and people in general calling him a false teacher. He talks about how catholicism, the Jesuits, etc. are of satan.

Those 5 pages of searches also show The Amazing Atheist and The Vigilant Christian are constantly making videos attacking eachother, and at one point even Vigilant Christian apologizes for mocking him.

In just those five pages, he says a LOT. I suggest you check them out, so you can try to make a better article, because this guys is a VERY big deal to Conspiracy Theorists. If you can show why he's a fraud rather than asserting it, you have basically put a HUGE dent in the Conspiracy Theorists movement. And I mean a HUGE one.

Also, if you dont want the videos at the righrt of the video to show up, I suggest the app magicactuions. It removes the video suggestions.

Some other videos to start with:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ODtJEEikqw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mkbYyGNQYA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dohoBV8IgI (This one shows he has, like, minor stopped clock moments in his arrogance)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12XDGeB4zZs (This one he show Darwin has an Illuminati Family Member (Spoiler: It's just "Know Your Enemy" episode on Evolution)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFR5igb28ZE (ZOMG teh pope calls teh Buybull a lie!!!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QV9zTOTxQNs (DEVILUTION!!! Teh gweitest lie EVER TOLD!!!)

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLLc-g5SFQoKqqEYPYPrrE6e9aCnBCC7jQ This Youtuber debunked some of his videos. (One of his Rebuttals refutes a video that has a pretty amusing name. I don't know if The Vigilant Christian repsonded to him though.

Anyways, sorry for the long post. I just felt this article had a lot of problems, and to be honest I have personal reason too (I have paraphrenia, and this guys doesn't help one bit). I personally am fighting to not become one of these people, because of my mental state i'm in. (I'm currently seeign a psychologist)

But This guy is ducking popular. Show why he's bullshit, not only would you show he's a fucking fraus and put a dent in the movement (They like to take advantage of people like me, who have delusions that impair our critical thinking skills), but his reaction videos would be hilarious.

Hope I didn't cause any bother.--67.5.232.125 (talk) 18:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Not sure if concern troll, considering this was weeks ago, but I'm bored, so yeah... I'll answer it.

This is the same guy who thinks the Illuminati would tell everyone they exist, and won't shut up about the 1980s. I'm sorry you have paraphrenia. i have problems similar to it, but why were you diagnosed with parephrenia? Are you over 50? Because I believe that's criteria. I have similar problems (delusions, overthinking, paranoia, depression, etc.), and this site is great help, but you also need to think for yourself. Believe me, yes webshites are creepy when you are that way, but critical thinking by yourself instead having a site like this do it for you REALLY helps.

That said, we can still answer questions or address claims, but don't spam links. Gish Gallops aren't cool. I know they make you paranoid. They make me paranoid too, but no one here has the time to watch everything.

Sorry for the half-assed response, but I'm in a hurry, plus I only answered in the EXTREMELY small chance you weren't a concern troll.--サトセレ (talk) 19:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Has he...
Has he talked shit about us, yet? He goes after and attacks everyone who debunks him or the Illuminati, so it only makes sense. Wouldn't be surprised if he links us to "THE GAY AGENDA" and so-forth. 108.219.226.24 (talk) 03:36, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * He linked to us to expose The Amazing Atheist. But never responded to this article, though when he does, that's going to be the best 30 minutes of the whole day.--サトセレ (talk) 19:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Some parts of this page and the wiki in general go overkill on the cuss words.
You don't need R rated words to get a nice rational point across. &mdash; Unsigned, by: 68.148.171.6 / talk / contribs 09:05, 7 September 2015‎
 * Can you overkill on cuss words? (What is a 'cuss word' anyway? - fucked if I know) Scream!! (talk) 08:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Why the fuck don't you sign your posts?! Just put " --~ " at the end of your talkpage posts!.--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ ∈)☼(∋ 14:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Avenger's law: "complaining about cuss-words on the internet will trigger a fucking barrage of swear words as well as a blimey invocation of the First Amendment". It has now been fucking observed in nature twice within two days, you cunts. Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * That last use of Fuck was a it gratuitous and is just distracting from the flow. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 14:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Fuck, you are right. Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 14:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Parts of this page could do with a cleanup.
I gave it a read. The front-end of the article seems to be the part that is the most worked on and generally passable as an article on our site, but as you scroll down it turns more into semi-coherent rambling-- an almost gleeful takedown of someone in a way that doesn't really do our site justice (It certainly doesn't seem like a unique personality, as far as cranks go.). I'd like to think we're better than that. I'd handle it myself, but I want to gauge thoughts on this first. -  Kitsunelaine  「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 09:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

White Rabbit
There's this guy on YouTube 'White Rabbit' he seems to be the same paranoid delusional conservative Christian like The Vigilant Christian (or maybe he's just doing that for shits and giggles, very hard to tell). Anyway, he's a bloody loon and I just wanted to let you guys know of him. The most delusional and funny video has to be where he claims that Pampers is satanists or something because random bullshit. Yeah, vigilant Christian even claimed they are friends and parts of the Christian "Truther" Network. Just another Delusioanal Paranoid Batshit crazy Christian. Hmm... Could WR and TVC be the same person? They sound very much the same.--WeakMindedSkeptic (talk) 10:05, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

More missing
Any more? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Satan
 * (Vampire) Sheeple
 * The Mikado (I have a little list, and none of them will be missed)
 * William Shakespeare - Hamlet (ghosts), The Scottish Play (Hubble Bubble), The Tempest (magic) etc etc.
 * Science Fiction and Fantasy
 * The Wikiverse (promotes good will and cooperation among contributors)
 * Vladimir Ilyich and friends (including JC)
 * Royalty and other reptiles.

Text removed
A citation or two would be damn nice. 22:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sorta unhappy with the whole list of things he deems demonic. It clutters up an otherwise decent article. Im tempted to remove it altogether--Pokefrazer (talk) 04:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

ok so
Someone suggested that all of the things that the vigilant Christian thinks are satanic illuminati should be listed in a separate article, is this a good idea or a bad idea --Godonaldgo (talk) 01:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

What a retard
Hahahhaa, I love the list of everything he thinks is satanic. It only keeps getting bigger. GreatPerson (talk) 09:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm the one who is editing it --Godonaldgo1 (talk) 20:18, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * And much appreciated! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Best part of it is that Super Mario Bros. is omitted from it so that's something. 22:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Only a matter of time --Godonaldgo1 (talk) 14:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)