Talk:Chimpout.com/Archive1

Quick look
I just had a quick look at that rather disturbing website. I don't fancy going back but can anyone tell me how serious they are, I mean its not another Landover Baptist Church type forum is it? --DamoHi 01:56, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd say there's a mix of people being serious, trolls, parodists, and people who are really racist but a little less extreme who are venting. A lot of them do mean exactly what they say, though. They've shown a willingness to post photographs and information of people other than public figures that even most traditional white supremacist sites shy away from. JoneeChit chat 02:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I can also personally attest that they do look you up on Facebook using the email under which you register to see if you're black or show any other obvious deviation from their beliefs. That ended my overly straight forward attempt at infiltration. JoneeChit chat 02:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * You do not need to be a member on that site, you can also post in the guest section. It is not a white nationalist website, infact stormfront (a white nationalist website) has banned chimpout members and chimpout have banned stormfront members. Members at chimpout come from all racial and ethnic backgrounds, they will accept anyone apart from black and they even accept homosexuals (something other white nationalists would never do). They have Jewish members on their site and chimpout does not tolerate any anti-semitic comments. Certain people may not want to hear this, but there are many racist arabs and indians who hate black people and some of these people can be found on chimpout posting long rants. There is no point in denying though that many of the members on chimpout are white racialists (KKK in their avatars etc), the only difference is, is instead of hating jews or asians like other white superemacists these guys have teamed up with some of these other races in hating blacks. Is it a serious website? Yes it is. DinoCrisis (talk) 03:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't consider "anyone apart from black" to be "all racial and ethnic backgrounds." Jonee (talk) 03:27, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * That's because you consider black people to be human. That is not universal.  Chimpout allows all humans of all races and ethnic backgrounds to join.  There is no contradiction in not allowing blacks to join because they are not human.  As vulgar and appalling as it is; if you accept the premises, the conclusion follows. --DamoHi 03:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I understand that that's why they see it that way. I just don't see why we would talk about it from that perspective on the talk page of the article. The information in DinoCrisis's comment is already in the article but presented in a snarkier and less positive manner. --Joneechit chat 03:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Serious Group
Funny how all of the people trumpeting "diversity" and "acceptance" don't seem to be bound by their own standards. In the real world this is known as hypocrisy. Chimpout simply delivers news and experiences about African-Americans not ordinarily reported in the usual outlets.

Their community is not afraid or ashamed to call it the way they see it, so unlike many other organizations, there is little to doubt in their positions. Oh, and for all of you folks who've just stereotyped Chimpout fans, you are GUILTY of the very same thing you profess to hate. Chimpout is politically incorrect, unashamedly disgusted with black America, and holds Liberals accountable for their actions when few others will. For their honesty I award 5 stars.
 * You sound completely unbiased and profoundly wise and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter. Ochotona princepsnot a pokémon 00:01, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I see what you did there. Tielec01 (talk) 00:38, 4 October 2013 (UTC)