Debate:Sexual Deviancy

I'm curious about why liberals are eager to make excuses for sexual deviants. Whether they be extreme homosexuals or 'recovering' paedophiles, liberals are always among the first to make excuses for these disgusting practises. Why? Jon (talk) 22:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Firstly - do they?
 * Secondly - If so I am sure people like Ted Haggard are glad of such forgivness.
 * Thirdly - are you a sexual deviant? Acei9 22:21, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * How dare you? I consider sexual deviants to be disgusting animals how could I possibly be a sexual deviant. Jon (talk) 22:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Considering it disgusting is no measure of someone not being a deviant. Just ask that California anti-gay rights dude who was caught drunk driving with a male prostitue recently. Acei9 22:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If you insinuate that I am a sexual deviant one more time I will make contact with my solicitor and bring you to court for slander. Watch it, sicko. Jon (talk) 22:29, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I never insinuated you were a sexual deviant, I asked you if you were. Your reaction makes me wonder. Acei9 22:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Good one, Jon. I thought you were serious for a second there. 22:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * What the hell is an "extreme homosexual"? Does that not imply that there are "extreme heterosexuals" as well? What about "extreme bisexuals" - do they exist or is it a contradiction in terms, like radical centrist? Colonel of Squirrels (talk) 22:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I am deadly serious. An extreme homosexual is one who tries to 'turn' straight people. You get these creeps all the time. In this new and accepting age you are supposed to tolerate a fag talking to you in a niteclub smoking area. They make me sick. What are you supposed to do when these guys are looking at you?? How do you know if they are thinking of having sex with you?? They make my skin crawl. Jon (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You're confusing homosexuals with vampires. Both are often snappy dressers, so it's a common mistake. -- 22:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Vampires have more blood in their veins than homosexuals. Jon (talk) 22:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ace, that is fucking Disgusting if you pot that vile deviancy Again I wilL engage in legal prosecutions you sick man. Jon (talk) 22:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I like how he capitalizes 'disgusting', as though it's a proper noun. I Eat Glue (talk) 22:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thats because it is Disgusting, these Disgusting men with their Disgusting minds. Jon (talk) 22:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, of course, because people who have the unmitigated gall to be different from you are absolutely sickening. Have you even met an actual gay man before?  Or a lesbian woman?  Or a bisexual, of either gender?  They are, by and large, perfectly normal people who just happen to have sexual preferences that differ from the established norm, and do so in a way that harms absolutely no one.  I Eat Glue (talk) 22:45, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

I will not tolerate this sick crap you sexual deviants are forcing on me. You do know this is considered sexual harrasment? Forcing people to view pornography (Especially sick homosexual pornography) is a serious crime. Jon (talk) 22:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Accept when it isn't pornography and is in fact a legitimate protest by Mexican farmers in the middle of Mexico City. Acei9 22:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Wait, how can you 'force' someone to view something? I Eat Glue (talk) 22:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, so you're raCist as well you sick fuck? What, its muCH more funy if they are Mexican? Then I suppose they are greaseballs to? You sick fuck. Jon (talk) 22:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Well it is difficult to photograph non-mexicans in Mexico City. Anyway -

Acei9 22:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Calm down, everyone
Let's get back on track. Jon, few liberals "force" what you term sexual deviancy on anyone. Second, while I agree with you that invading one's personal space in public (regardless of the person's sexual orientation) is uncalled for, you cannot control people's thoughts, words or sexual orientations. It is their right to behave as they see fit as long as it does not directly harm you. I have a question: how is a gay couple kissing in public any worse than a straight couple doing so? 22:51, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you have asperger's or something? You seem like the blinkered sort. Jon (talk) 22:53, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I don't. And if you're not going to be civil then there is no point to this debate. 22:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No but Your Appeals to everYone to calm down is reminiscint of a perSon who struggleS to observe basic Social Interaction. Jon (talk) 22:55, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The secret message is apparently 'NYAYSSSI', whatever that means. I Eat Glue (talk) 23:01, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I figured there might be a (very) small chance that you would be willing to ignore Ace's lovely picture above and be reasonable and civil. Apparently I was wrong. 22:59, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Define sexual deviancy
Seriously, I have yet to say anyone properly define it. Bazer63 (talk) 18:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * "Sex I don't approve of because I think it's gross", by and large. It's a pretty meaningless term.  Jon, who created this debate, was just being a shithead.  ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 18:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 5-year necropost. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 22:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Forum-necromancy is doubleplusgood. 141.134.75.236 (talk) 22:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Define
Sexual deviancy.--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ 10:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Who are you asking? The OP was a one-day conservatroll who hasn't been heard from in over five years. Bicycle  wheel silverbrain.png 10:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I didn't know (and didn't think of checking his contribs. Just was bored and looking at the RC list with a Debate/Forum filter).--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ 10:24, 3 August 2015 (UTC)