Conservapedia:What is going on at CP?/December 2008

It's simple maths. Bush = America therefore Hating Bush = Hating America! Yes, RickD...try telling that to 73% of the American population... Smells like a trap. Think they'll keep any reasonable "Yes" opinions up? It sure takes a lot of extreme lawyer thought for this Example of Bias! More beef with Comedy Central and Jon Stewart including the dubious 60% statistic. Self-proclaimed "fairly conservative Muslim-American" RonAbdul confronts Arrogant Andy over the "upside down" structure and uncited allegations in the public schools article. Andy returns, accusing Abdul of being closed-minded. But it turns out that Andy is really the guilty one. Who will win? Stay tuned for updates... A great comment, brought to you straight from Andyland. Update: Some liberal is about to get smacked down HARD for daring to imply that 10 idiots and a few dozen teenagers aren't doing a better job than the entirety of Wikipedia. Aschlaf Y thinks Michelle Obama should take fashion advice from Ann Coulter. Do I detect a hint of longing in your voice, Aschlaf?

Kenservative tells Andy that his views on US gun control are foolish!?!? Update: TK joins in: "The Supreme Court of the United States has decided this issue!" End of discussion, one presumes. But hey, TK! The Supreme Court also said that banning abortion is unconstitutional. End of discussion? Even with the typo in the title, this is still the most intelligent article on CP Update: the apostrophe is gone. Update2: DeanS deletes, restored by Assfly for its educational value. Update3: CPAdmin1 TimS returns just to tag the essay with ; Andy removes the tag only 11 minutes later. How's that for speedy? The cost of branding PJR as a liberal: "I also know that a substantial percentage of YECs are liberal and did vote for Obama." Apparently, when a liberal runs for Governor without holding public office beforehand, he's a bozo but when a Republican does it... Classic TK. He reverts Jessica's "revisionist" (the CIA is revisionist?) entry and replaces it with the "correct" reference... which states exactly what Jessica said in the first place. MOAR TeacaKe tries to censor the evidence of his getting pwnd on the talk page and Roger puts it back. Side Effect A very nice MYOB 🇰🇪 hopes that a domain squatter will "eat away at Wikipedia's market share". Did he not read the article he posted, or is this simply wishful thinking? UPDATE: Hang on, we can't have any criticisms of capitalism around here! Or maybe even "entrepreneurial capitalists" was too strong... Andy's advice for the mentally ill? "Turn off the TV, stop reading the newspaper, and pick up a Bible." Sure, because immersing themselves further in a fantasy world is just what those crazies need.

Hurricane Ed strikes the correlation article. There's no one left who cares about this Hurricane Ed strikes the R.A. Salvatore article. There were no survivors. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1061 img="on">The perceptive and erudite TK says Happy New Years, Professor Poor! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1060 img="on">Karajerk sets the tone for CP in 2009... MOAR HITLER! and bad spelingns. Update: You're welcome, Teacake. Now fix the page title. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1059 img="on">🇰🇪 adds some dialogue of him flirting with a young lady to his talkpage, removes it, then deletes and recreates. Feeling guilty Ken? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1058 img="on">CPWebmaster:Tim, we may not be perfect, but we're the best out there - and everyone else will hate you and your moral beliefs. Tim: This place makes Jesus AND Reagan look bad by association. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1057 img="on">We were never at war with Eastasia. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1056 img="on">Being touched up by Uncle Ed: a fate worse than deletion? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1055 img="on">It begins. Do not talk about buglers, even in proper context.Moar "Whatever happened to...?" ( WAIT FOR IT ) <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1054 img="on">Andrew Schlafly know that it would be bad for America if Obama were Muslim. Leave it to a parodist to explain how it would be equally bad if Obama weren't a Muslim. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1053 img="on">Bugler says farewell and comes out as a parodist. More: Like CPAdmin1, he is already an unperson.  And the door slams behind him. A little more: Someone tries to show Andy the lesson he should learn from this, predictably, fails and gets punished. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1052 img="on">Literally making history. And Andy? Still silence... <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1051 img="on">A great way to celebrate New Year's Eve: Bitching about something that never quite really happened and in the end proving your incompetent reading comprehension. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1050 img="on">New sysops are in. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1049 img="on">Suddenly Andy's worldview becomes very clear. UPDATE: A new Schlafly meme? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1048 img="on">I hate to break it to you, TK, but you and Andy got the first two parts of that quote backwards. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1047 img="on">CPAdmin1 resigns in epic fashion. Update TK, on the other hand, resolves to continue being a petty thug. More: TK and Andy hide the evidence. And: no more user rights or old user name. More: Comment at your own peril! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1046 img="on">"These statistics look made up and make conservatives look bad", says concerned editor. "Of course I made them up... please find cites to prove my claims", says Andy. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1045 img="on">The CP way of editorial discussion: Somebody adds a claim you doubt. So what do you do? Take it to the talk page to discuss? Nope: Revert and call in reinforcements to X-Ray and bully the guy. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1044 img="on">Andy adds another great achievement, presumably to the world of comedy. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1043 img="on">Guess who thought to "(trim to get artwork on first screen)". No possibility that you realised how SCHTUPID some of the "awards" were & decided to sweep them under the carpet? Suicide volunteers required to sock up & enquire after them please. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1042 img="on">TK flexes his checkuser muscles <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1041 img="on">As we slip from 2008 into 2009, OUT with the French Revolution (29247 views) and IN with Teenage Homosexuality (8923 views). Always a popular subject amongst homoschoolers. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1040 img="on">Who would ever have guessed? TK's become more right-wing and authoritarian <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1039 img="on">Suckup. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1038 img="on">Learn together tries to build peace between Tim, Bugler and TK, and to "make sure that those watching from the outside can see us to be fair and honest". Sorry LT, but it's a couple of years too late for that. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1037 img="on">Most Cubans are black, sez everybody's favorite world history teacher actually, sez the Wall Street Journal. Yebbut, the CIA (among other sources) disagrees. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1036 img="on">Tim disagrees with another of Bugler's blocks, breaking the new rule again. Expect further wheel warring. Update: It's On! (TK throws down the gauntlet & Tim accepts.) Update: Currently seven violations of TK's shiny new rule... <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1035 img="on">Christians called to abandon public education. In other breaking news, some idiot in Concord, Massachusetts fired a shot heard around the world... <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1034 img="on">7 year olds and 20 year olds now count as teenagers? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1033 img="on">Andrew Schlafly says this sensible newspaper is squealing like a stuck pig. Why do you say such a nasty thing, Andy? The Schlaflys don’t slaughter pigs without stunning them we hope. Is that what Momma Schlafly used to say when you and the other the kids couldn’t take her reasonable chastisement? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1032 img="on"> Getting pregnant at 17 now counts as a "Great Achievement by a Teenager". <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1031 img="on">Bugler finally explains it all: Australians don't know shit about Australian problems because they are too close to the problem. You need an American who has never been to Australia to really bring in the insights. Update points out the flaw in this approach and gets Bugled for a week. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1030 img="on">Just before Conservapedia might have succeeded in convincing all of one person that Barack Obama is a Muslim, they spoil everything with their latest exciting news flash: He's part of a Unitarian terrorist cell! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1029 img="on">PJR to TK: Fuck off, troll. Assfly to PJR: Fuck off, librul. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1028 img="on">Hey Ed, when this gets reinstated, can we use this as a cite? UPDATE: Prophecy or lucky guess? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1027 img="on">Ed "I'm CP's foremost math expert and teacher" Poor is back in town. Deletes a whole page (that's his modus operandi) on integration because he "can't believe a parabola would be used like this". Uh, it's called Simpson's rule, Ed. Read some books. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1026 img="on">Those familiar with The One Internet Viral to Rule Them All will appreciate the badgertastic inclusion of the humble Badger in the list of words requiring retranslation in the Bibble. Andy won't be happy with the idea that it may need "an expert". Andy doesn't like experts. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1025 img="on">That's not your real name. Try again, neither is your real name your real name. Wait, what?. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1024 img="on">Bugler can't accept that abstinence-only education isn't the way to go and presents a simple solution on the talk page: What these poor people need is MOAR JESUS! Expect blocks, rearguards and personal remarks soon. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1023 img="on">Oh yeah, this is going to be fun. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1022 img="on">The reward for showing interest in Andy's Bible Revisionism Rewriting Retranslation Project: Upload, Block and Edit rights in less than two months after joining. Congratulations! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1021 img="on">Sorry to burst your bubble there Ken, but PZ Myers did tackle the CP Evolution rant article. He was totally dismissive of it, which is basically all it deserves. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1020 img="on">Futility, 2nd version: Kotomi reasons with TK. Update: TK responds. It's about what you'd expect. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1019 img="on">Cripes, Ken, we know you love to misrepresent the facts, but isn't replying to a conversation from almost two years ago (with people permabanned under false pretenses) as if it were current kinda pushing it a little? Extra feebleness Sure Ken, we believe you. Why wouldn't you expect AmesG to have a current account at CP, anyway? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1018 img="on">There, that should stop PJR and CPAdmin1 from sticking up for the users. The Fun Begins? Let's watch, shall we? One, Two , Three rounds so far, and Tim hasn't blinked. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1017 img="on">Oh no! The creationists are "raady" for the attack! What will we do against these misspelling wonders? Update Deleted to break the diff link. Laugh this one off 🇰🇪, we have CaptureBot. MOAR You are making a real arse of yourself today 🇰🇪. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1016 img="on">Well sure, the majority of voters chose Obama. But it's not like they thought he was qualified or anything. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1015 img="on">Andy: An hour spent reading Conservapedia is as educational as 100 hours spent reading a book. Honestly, does Andy ever think about anything before he says it? Extra Sauce Cripes, why don't they get a room. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1014 img="on">Jessica takes RodWeathers out behind the woodshed for a little "chat". How long until his parodist-in-arms Bugler comes to rescue him? Update Nope, looks like it's Andy's bestest buddy instead, while Andy studiously ignores the whole thing, spending his time insulting a college instead. Jessica really tries to help <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1013 img="on">So just one bad case means that the whole British National Health Service is wrong? Why on Earth is “National Health Service” so popular then? If one case counts so much, Christian Conservatism must be devilish awful. Look at Ted Haggard, and the others. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1012 img="on">Andy "final reply" Schlafly replies to Brichtigen (accusing him of last-wordism) two hours after BRichtigen was blocked. That should should fix those pesky last-wordists! Then, 7 minutes later, he shows his righteous indignation over last-wordism by creating an official block reason for it. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1011 img="on">Define futility <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1010 img="on">STFU, dissenter! We said shut it! You just don't learn, do you? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1009 img="on">What would you call this edit? If your answer was "censorship", then you'd be in for a block. If your answer was "reverting a vandal", then you might be TK. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1008 img="on">TK's method of dealing with BRichtigen: Happyfun rangeblocks! It worked before and still does, just with a slightly more deceitful reason. Of course, once BRichtigen uses a proxy to edit, he will be blocked for being a Sock of Multiple Blocked Users. Update Bugler says "screw subtlety" and just makes up a reason to block him for a week. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1007 img="on">Whatever next? Evidently all those liberal experts who can't be relied upon to give us the truth about the Bible have confirmed that the Bible is the most historically and intellectually reliable ancient text in the whole world. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1006 img="on">CPAdmin1 to Aschlafly: ''[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3ABible_Retranslation_Project&diff=594656&oldid=594651 Your source is a blog. I gave 4 separate sources that are Greek lexicons. Which do you think is more reliable?]''. Do you really want to know? UPDATE: I'll take my blog and some shit I just made up over your fancy book larnin any day MOAR! Tim, it is well known that expertise is a liberal trait! Think for yourself and think the same thoughts as I do. Your gut instinct plus whatever random blogs you can find that support it are far more reliable. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1005 img="on">Q: Are we not men? A: We are Devo! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1004 img="on">Court upholds "gun rights" (for a guy who surrendered his guns during divorce proceedings). <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1003 img="on">Kids are far too anxious. It has to be you guess, lack of faith. Fundy kids can’t possibly have nightmares about hell. They can’t possibly be anxious because some sadistic fundy adult will punish them over something they’ve done, might have done etc. It can be hard being a fucked up fundy kid. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1002 img="on">It's just not Christmas without an Obama smear, is it? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1001 img="on">The great work of creating the Schlafly Bible has begun! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo1000 img="on">Teacake celebrates the season of brotherly goodwill by lying about a fellow sysop "senior administrator", making accusations, and throwing cheap insults around. He finally feels strong enough to remove the reminder that he was blocked and on probation. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo999 img="on">Ed "I'm CP's foremost math expert and teacher" Poor creates a page for the movie "College Road Trip" saying nothing about the movie other than that it contains a math error. Hey Ed, how about looking at Foxtrot's (and your) massive math stupidity instead? And you do know that a diameter of 10 inches isn't the same as a radius of 4 or 5 cm, right, Ed? Ed? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo998 img="on">RodWeathers quotes Darwin out of context. Here’s what Darwin really wrote UPDATE: Corrected by. . . Conservative?! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo997 img="on">On several different occasions Teh Assfly gave students high marks for saying it’s just fine for the US government to spy on its citizens. Suddenly, he then brings up "non-beneficial" spying. Who decides what’s beneficial? Teh Assfly and teh Republicans of course. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo996 img="on">Reversion, or self-fulfilling prophecy? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo995 img="on">'Tis not the season to be preachy. Too bad Andy missed the memo. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo994 img="on">Ed hates Christmas. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo993 img="on">(Moar Ed) "Bugler, how many times must I tell you to avoid personal remarks and cluttering up der Führer's talk page? Just block them!" <vote closed=yes poll=wigo992 img="on">Ed Poor: "Here, let me liveblog some Star Trek episode. Ah, no, wait, I lost interest again." Update: Ed-baiting fails. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo991 img="on" >Yet more garbage trying to say Global warming isn’t real. Only Andy and DeanS can possibly be right. Respected scientists say Global warming is real. Andy, Deanie, stop imagining you’re cleverer than those scientists. Read, Essay:Status Worship and learn. You won't look so stupid if you just stop worshiping your own status. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo990 img="on">They estimate that 2 million people will come to see the inauguration of President Obama in person. Even more will watch on television. That's how keen Americans are to see improvements after Dubya. Where did we get that information? It’s from Conservapedia. Andy boasts that this number falls short of initial expecations due to status worship fatigue, but even the American Thinker admits it's more a problem of... you know... that not being logistically feasible. Also Andy didn't point out that "the crowd may well surpass the previous highest inaugural crowd". <vote closed=yes poll=wigo989 img="on">When you talk about this, are you referring to the federal gay marriage ban, or overturning Roe v. Wade? Just clarifying. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo988 img="on">I'll take "Rivers in Egypt" for 400, Alex: Tim: "Obama will use the Bible when he is sworn into office. So there, guys." He won't make a hole in Lincoln's Bible and put a Koran into it. Bugler: "Purest speculation! And even if it was true, it wouldn't prove anything! Oh, and also, you totally abused your sysop rights to promote the Liberal Media Agenda, scum." <vote closed=yes poll=wigo987 img="on">Andy gets his knickers in a knot because President-elect Obama decides to use his full name when being sworn in, although it's not clear if it was because a Muslim community leader asked him to or, you know, because it's a totally normal thing to do. Knowing Andy, it's the former. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo986 img="on">While in Hawaii, Obama ate Spam Musubi. Muslims by law can't eat pork. Therefore, Obama cannot be a muslim! Andy: Not everyone knows Spam is made of pork, therefore it's not proof! Obama drank beer, perhaps. At least there's a beer called Obama Beer. Aschlafly imagines beer isn't forbidden in Islam. Beer is forbidden. You can't easily make this much stupidity up, folks. Andrew Schlafly#Reasons why Andy Schlafly is a Muslim? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo985 img="on">Highlights from the final homework of the semester. Question 2 - On Reagan and Clinton: [http://www.conservapedia.com/American_History_Homework_Thirteen_Answers_-_Student_Two "WOW!!" different parties.] "Clinton took away our guns".  "Clinton let everything go wrong".  "Ronald Regan {sic} failed at almost everything".  The difference is "sex with an intern".  Question 4 - On threats to America's future: Atheism!  Obama!  [http://www.conservapedia.com/American_History_Homework_Thirteen_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen Evolution! And gay marriage!] SIN!!! Grading: 26 students, only 2 got below 98%, nobody lost any credit for misspelling "Reagan". <vote closed=yes poll=wigo984 img="on">Yet another extremely inspiring quote by TK. Here too! But next time, you might want to make sure that Patrick Henry really said it. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo983 img="on">Andy: "More than 60% of public school kids in one survey watch more than 3 hours of television a day, good news to producers of liberal junk like Comedy Central." The "survey" was a study of just teens in Memphis (national average, 35% watch that much), and the article mentioned nothing of what they watched. GOATS TK makes sure Comedy Central's article doesn't have anything positive, and includes Fatwa envy. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo982 img="on">Bugler has learned which dictators politicians are worth defending. (Regular readers may recall that Aschlafly ♥ Pinochet.) <vote closed=yes poll=wigo981 img="on">Ken <3 parodists <vote closed=yes poll=wigo980 img="on">"Conservative" (what a ridiculous user name) is at it again, showing off his remarkable editing and composition skills. His article took 34 edits, including 3 page moves, in just over 2 hours.UPDATE Ken  back. "Gentlemen if you don't get it right first time, do it again... and again... and again... and... <vote closed=yes poll=wigo979 img="on">Yet again, Andy reminds everyone of the corruption inherent in professors - even in Nobel prize winners! It sure would be embarrassing if the linked article suggested there was corruption. It would almost be like putting a deposition before a court without even reading what it says.  Successful lawyers just don't do things like that... <vote closed=yes poll=wigo978 img="on">The Road To Sysop Rights (a.k.a. "It worked once, it'll work again, dammit!"): TK starts a long article about Domestic terrorism by openly copy-pasting the legal definition, copy-pasting from a news article, writing one line himself and adding a  he claims is non-copyrighted, but without saying where he got it from. Maybe it was from here ("Copyright © 2008 by NDAA, All Rights Reserved") ? We'll never know... <vote closed=yes poll=wigo977 img="on">You forgot "hire a real teacher"! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo976 img="on"> Now why on earth doesn’t Conservpedia tolerate people questioning Conservative Christian faith? Surely they’re confident their beliefs can stand up to testing? Surely dogma or collective bias shouldn't enter Conservapedia? Should it? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo975 img="on"> Aschlafly’s freedom should mean you’re free to do what teh Assfly wants and nothing else. Gay people shouldn’t have freedom to get their partnerships legally recognised. Fortunately the Constitution in California doesn't allow the majority to trample on important minority rights and Conservapedia’s Main Page is a bit pissed. Really pissed. You never know... John Schlafly might want to marry his boyfriend. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo974 img="on">We've taken Andrew Schlafly and replaced him with someone who can say something not freaking insane once in a while. Let's see if anyone notices. SWIFT UPDATE Too bad the original lunatic came back. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo973 img="on">The Nazis were an anti-Christian organization. Bugler continues with more revisionist lulz. UPDATE: "We don't block for ideological reasons." <vote closed=yes poll=wigo972 img="on">Andy makes up more shit to tarnish Obama. Are hate and deceit really Christian values, or just Schlafly values? Joe the Plumber was just that bit dishonest. Is McCain at fault for that? Joe the Plumber dislikes you if you don't agree with him 100%. Isn't that just like teh Assfly? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo971 img="on">FernoKlump pops off a first-class parthian shot. MOAR TARGET After the shot is cleared, AlanM reposts it. Subsequent beletion and kill. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo970 img="on">This from the man who bloviates endlessly about the size of his online class? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo969 img="on">TomMoore was blocked for six months back in June. Now he's back (yes, he waited for his block to expire)... and quickly gets a five-year ban for these contribs, which apparently did nothing but "wasting the time of good editors". <vote closed=yes poll=wigo968 img="on">If you’re unfairly blocked at CP you’re on your own. Nobody else is allowed to help you. Complaining about bad blocks is shameful img according to TK. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo967 img="on">Abdul is a Moslem. He talked back to teh Assfly then did it again. He inserted accurate information about Christian bigotry. They must find an excuse to block him. You've got to figure out how to join the team...or you're blocked. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo966 img="on">Uh, Joaquín...you do realize that King Arthur was fictional, right? And why did you leave Charles Darwin out? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo965 img="on">Aschlafly unexpectedly banhammers Human for "a silly pattern of editing" and other transgressions (like being blocked before and having a fake name). Sideways queries the block but falls afoul of a TK revert and a crafty range block (of the UK-based ISP Tiscali). But Sideways won't take it lying down. img Update That's funny, Geo.plrd pulls an almost identical range block not long after Sideways' post. Whatever could it all mean? Predictable update: Andy really doesn't give a damn.  And finally: Sideways is permabanned for dodging the range block by using the same proxy IP as some unrelated vandals. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo964 img="on">Andy shows exactly why we don't "teach the controversy" and let kids decide for themselves what they think is right: "Most Influential Person in American History". Ronald Reagan and Thomas Edison were more influential than Benjamin Franklin, one of the founding fathers? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo963 img="on">You say po-tay-to, troll says po-tah-to. Even if it was short-lived, the drive-by lulz is worth watching. UPDATE: Srosenberg reverts the 'troll', but Karajou seems to think calling Christianity a 'religion' is 'vandalism', and reverts it back to 'tax scam and pedophile ring'. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo962 img="on">TK really may have more brains than a toad. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo961 img="on">More. Joaquin claims fair use; site claims "Unless otherwise noted, all text and graphics on this website (yeodoug.com) are ©1996-2006 by Douglas Yeo. All rights reserved." <vote closed=yes poll=wigo960 img="on">Obama definitely won't use the Koran. Will they change the article? UPDATE-A-RIFFIC! Apparently Bugler thinks an Evangelical Christian Minister might think the Koran is a swell idea after all. The More You Know I spot a Poe! TEH ASSFLY SPEAKETH Naive or malicious? I choose malicious. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo959 img="on">He tried so hard to find a use for Ed's &#123;{years ago}&#125; template. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo958 img=on>No, Andy. The voices in your head don't count as students. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo957 img="on">Rod's parody paranoia reaches new heights. "Maybe some of our hymns are *gasp* librull". <vote closed=yes poll=wigo956 img="on">"I can write" says Special Ed. Just really badly. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo955 img="on">RodWeathers never took a biology class (or possibly slept through it). The mammal order is filled with examples of altruistic social behavior leading to the survival of the population (primates, for example, are extremely social and altruistic). UPDATE "Evolution is not about the population!" Uh, Rod? That's exactly what evolution is about. DOLPHINS I meant cats nursing non-cats and dolphins helping humans! Sure, Rod. Sure.

<vote closed=yes poll=wigo952 img="on">TeaK: You Brits should learn American spelling and stop being rational. TK blocked Sakyamuni08 for telling the truth. That's typical injustice. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo951 img="on">C'mon, don't make your parodist account so noticeable! Torched! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo950 img="on">Sadly enough, this is about as much of a compromise as you'll ever get on CP: "Mayyyyybe there was a conservative in the last century who made a sorta-kinda bigoted statement. But you're still not allowed to say so in mainspace! And always remember: If he did something bad, he was of course No True Conservative. Nuh-uh." <vote closed=yes poll=wigo949 img="on">TCochrane gets reasonable edits reverted and a ban. His crime? Ignoring Andy's hatred of "liberal spin." UPDATE Doesn't Ed ever get a 90/10 ban? GOAT Ed gets last wordism. DADDY LOVE Talk down to the contributor working for free, Ed. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo948 img="on">TeaK wants people to know one of his guiding principles is from a character portrayed by Shatner. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo947 img="on">Andy: CP does not have a YEC viewpoint! Conservative: Yes it does! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo946 img="on">Alexander Parodist M: "Please unprotect Premarital sex." Ed: (makes the obligatory joke) AlexanderM: "Thank you sir may I have another." Aschlafly is married. It's too late for premarital sex so he (rolls over and goes back to sleep) <vote closed=yes poll=wigo945 img="on">And there we have it. But remember, CP is not a right-wing site. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo944 img="on">Andy's idea of a good learning environment: Shut it, peasant, and get back to work! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo943 img="on">Creation Science in action. Sound reasoning is BAD! Bad, I tell you! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo942 img="on">There have never been any Christians who have bombed abortion clinics. OK, let's just pretend those incidents never really happened. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo941 img="on">RJJensen goes to town through the pics in the Life archives, ain't he? Well,, anyhow. Oh, and this one's cute,. Maybe...on the page you got it from? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo940 img="on">Meritocracy in action: Jpatt: "We should make people earn news post tokens by contributing Wanted Pages." DeanS: "Great idea, but let's make sure to treat liberals as second-class citizens! No tokens for them!" <vote closed=yes poll=wigo939 img="on">Gallery of American Heroes - see also: Andre Agassi <vote closed=yes poll=wigo938 img="on">Bugler: Honi soit qui mal y pense! Or, for those of you who prefer English, "Shame on him who suspects illicit motivation!" According to Wikipedia, this is usually used ironically, or, in this case, by a parodist admitting he is a parodist by ironically denying it. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo937 img="on">In order to beef up the Science of Global Warming (denial), jpatt offers up expert commentary by a man deep in the pockets of the coal industry and a retired geologist. Trusworthy, indeed. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo936 img="on">Breadan43 makes sure CP users know who the liberals are. And in case you didn't know, these are also liberals. Now you can always tell the bad guys! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo935 img="on">JY23, the next Ed Poor. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo934 img="on">Vandalism is now saying the USA was founded by secularists. What will it be next? Denying that all professors are satanists or that all actors in Hollywood are drug-addled homosexuals? Later they unblocked him and said sorry. The chances are the user will stop contributing after he's seen the ban window. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo933 img="on">Ed, I understand that they all sort of look alike to you, but it's Magic Johnson who is HIV-positive (but is not "AIDS-infected" yet), not Michael Jordan. Well, we could always put the heroes to a vote...Nah, maybe then John McCain's picture would get too big for the page... <vote closed=yes poll=wigo932 img="on">How do you prepare students for standardized tests? Ask them to "contrast President Ronald Reagan with President Bill Clinton," cite history to answer "what is the most important threat to the future of America," and critically reason "using American history as your guide, predict what will happen in the first two years of the Obama Administration." People pay money for this australopithecene to teach their kids? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo931 img="on">"We need help". You don't say! "We need to get actual scientists to write this article. It's too complex for us laymen." Among the many other scientific articles on CP, written by non-scientists, criticizing sound, accepted science? But what if those scientists don't put in "the facts" you want? Then what? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo930 img="on">Maybe we need a moratorium on Ed lulz. Or maybe Ed needs to stop being funny? Now Ed wants facts to support someone's edits; nevermind how often Ed shoots the foot he has in his mouth. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo929 img="on">Ed, science is not your strong point. Should you really categorize "Darwinism" as pseudoscience? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo928 img="on">[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&curid=71916&diff=588932&oldid=588927 Uh, Ed? You're not hip. Don't try.] <vote closed=yes poll=wigo927 img="on">Moar Ed stubbing. This time, "scripture and reason," which is almost a parody of CP itself. "For he opposes to the truth not the meaning of the Bible, which is beyond his comprehension, but rather his own interpretation; not what is in the Bible, but what he has found in himself and imagines to be there." How soon before St. Augustine is banned from CP for being a liberal? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo926 img="on">After insisting scientific controversies can't be resolved, Ed sets out to prove Galileo had no issues with the church. Now the Bible says that the sun and moon stood still. (Joshua 10:13) Perhaps little Ed hadn't studied the Bible and didn't know that. More. Ed claims Galileo's article needed to be scrubbed of anti-religious, liberal bias unless someone could find proof. So Ed finds some. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo925 img="on">Helping to defend the future, Sara Connor signs up for an account, then posts a 3,000 character advertisement article for Vocalcom. Wikispam, the wave of the future! Also: John Titor, visitor from the future, made an appearance. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo924 img="on">Seeing as you blew off her concerns about folks overstepping their authority, Ed, you really should be a bit less cavalier about dropping writing assignments on her. Just sayin'. UPDATE Arigatou, but no thanks. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo923 img="on">Ed's stubbing continues: "Scientific controversy when multiple scientists assert different viewpoints on a scientific matter. There is no particular method for resolving a scientific debate." Apparently Ed's never heard of experiments? Update Ed's example of a modern day scientific controversy is Galileo and the telescope. MOAR COWBELL Ed immediately deletes his idiotic example (that also refutes his original claim). RELATED LULZ I dunno Ed, maybe you could ask Richard Lenski? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo922 img="on">BRichtigen makes a good point: "If you want to have good contributions to this site, you have to care for a pleasant working environment." This should earn him a lengthy ban. Will it be for 90/10 violation? Not minding his own business? Improper discussion? Liberal vandalism? Proxy usage? Pool's open, just ten for a square! UPDATE Ed offers to take it offsite. UPDATE Jessica adds goats to the thread. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo921 img="on"> On the Conservapedia front page it says that a few scientists are sceptical about Global warming. Now an awful lot of respected scientists are convinced Global Warming is real. See The British Royal Society for an example. The Scientific American also believes global warming is real. Aschlafly must think he's such a genius that he understands science better than meteorologists and others whose job is working out what's happening with climate change. People get killed in hurricanes, floods droughts and other problems that Global Warming causes. Deliberately ignoring the evidence comes close to homicide. What does Aschlafly think should happen to those guilty of homicide. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo920 img="on">Aww, isn't that cute? He's pretending to be a lawyer! MOAR Okay, doctors don't inform their patients of risks to avoid malpractice suits, and a historian intimately familiar with the Illinois constitution has anti-republican views. Did Andy blackmail his way through law school, or what? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo919 img="on">While this is quite likely just an edit conflict, the edit summary is oddly fitting. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo918 img="on">Shorter TK: CP has no laws, so if a sysop does you wrong, STFU and take it. Update: Corry gets proved right. Update^2: AlanS lays in front of the banhammer in a doomed act of moral protest. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo917 img="on">Leeb cleans up Andy's unscientific claims from the Lenski affair. Andy promptly reverts, then bans him for five years, "inappropriate edits, with a misleading edit summary." No pleasing some people. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo916 img="on">Joaquín loves him some traitors. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo915 img="on">PhilipV thought the nasty stuff in Mystery:Why Do Non-Conservatives Exist? deserves an apology. PhilipV got teh blockie (twice!) instead of an apology. Conservatives may insult others. It's naughty if Liberals complain about it. Update: Andy refuses to disclose how he came up with his numbers, but that no one can doubt them; someone who explains guesses are not statistical estimates is a liberal. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo914 img="on">Teen pregnancy is up in America. So says our favourite trustworthy encyclopaedia. The link points out that teen mothers are more likely to become or remain poor and their kids have more problems. How does Europe avoid all this? America needs need less abstinence stuff and more contraceptive education. That's what Goodless Europe does. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo913 img="on">Wait, is Andy "everyone should recognize the greatness of American English" Schlafly using British phrasing? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo912 img="on">Ooh, that's gonna leave a mark! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo911 img="on">How will Conservapedia respond to this? The Answer: Predictably. Although the exchange with Bugler is surprisingly civil. Update Andy basically admits that yeah, he pretty much made all the figures up. How refreshing. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo910 img="on">One of the most unexpected side effects of rampant parodists, Teh Koward sticking up for intellectual honesty. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo909 img="on">Ed Poor weighs in on God's Will: "Knowing God's will is the key to prayer, spiritual growth and fruitfulness in our individual lives." Then links to an external site's article. Ed's stubbing is getting thinner and thinner, and far less important. Now Ed, Do you study the word of the Bible or the words of Moonies? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo908 img="on">Admins at their best. According to Ed, CP can use various images, just because we. Na-na-nana-na. Just because the site says no reproduction or republication without written permission doesn't actually mean we need permission. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo907 img="on">Remember, Conservapedia is not a dictionary! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo906 img="on">Tim calls out three suspected parodists! Two we know, and... who? UPDATE: Then again, maybe he won't <vote closed=yes poll=wigo905 img="on">Jesus Andy! Again with the "2+2=4" nonsense <vote closed=yes poll=wigo904 img="on">Yet another 90/10 block for a user with one contribution. Update: Ed Poor doesn't oppose FernoKlump's 90/10 initiative any longer - he just ignores it... <vote closed=yes poll=wigo903 img="on">Gay marriage is bad because "every marriage should benefit society." (Oh, crap, the word 'every' doesn't appear in the Newsweek article) Textbook example: we have yet to see how exactly Mr. and Mrs. Schlafly's marriage benefitted society... <vote closed=yes poll=wigo902 img="on">(Dis)Honest Ed redefines edit war as reverting an unexplained removal once. Disagreeing with Ed Moon is now a blockable offense. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo901 img="on">A new user asks a question. Bugler and Ed answer politely. Shame RodWeathers never received the memo. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo900 img="on">This from the man who created red links for BDSM and Swinging. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo899 img="on">, keep it. Please. How much more tacky can these get? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo898 img="on">"Conservative" continues editing a discredited disease. But gays are bad, so the "truth" must be kept current! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo897 img="on">American History Homework Twelve Answers - Student 25 says "Russia" when he means the entire USSR, says that the Vietnam and Korean wars were "the two wars that caused immense casualties between 145 and 1980", is impressed by Jackie Robinson "because baseball is shown everywhere so he received a lot bad criticism and hate", says Lyndon Johnson was known "for his ability to shove everyone out of his way", and claims that the "Warren court was anti-God they made a lot of bad and unmoral decisions". What grade does this startling oversimplification of American politics and butchering of English grammar earn Student 25? "Perfect answers! Superb. May use this as a model! 70/70. Congratulations!" Yeah, I'm sure this is preparing kids really well for the AP tests. Especially since, among fourteen papers, everybody got either 70/70 or 100/100 except for one 69/70 and one 99/100. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo896 img="on">Can you suck up the teacher too much? No, you can't! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo895 img="on">Apparently feeling pressured to look like he's not protecting a parodist, Special Ed blocks Bugler for a whole two hours! That'll teach him! Unfortunately, Bugler forgot he was supposed to be playing dead and starts blocking people after only a little more than half that time. Oopsie! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo894 img="on">So a new user comes in and makes a flurry of Cognitive Science changes to articles. The result? Permaban for "inserting gibberish or nonsense" and a deletion of otherwise good edits, and an assertion he is a vandal/parodist?!. Vey to go Ed! UPDATE Ken undoes Ed's "whimsical" block. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo893 img="on">Cripes, Ed! We tell you about your failures all the freakin' time, and you haven't shown any improvement yet. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo892 img="on">My Jesus is about  hellfire , not that liberal "forgiveness" crap! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo891 img="on">No conflict of interest there, nosir! Maybe Ken's upset since nobody seems to really care about his rants over there lately. Extra Lulz "Now that everyone's stated what name they'd like on the award, I'll go have it made under the name I want instead." Embarrassingly Stupid Ken favours historical figures over contemporary while discussing an award where he pushed for the exact opposite. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo890 img="on">Asking a court to boot a corrupt governor from office is demanding judicial activism. But it is, of course, perfectly all right to ask a court to boot the President-elect because Conservapedia doesn't like his birth certificate! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo889 img="on">Sarah Palin's church was torched. The culprits have not been identified yet (there is not even proof that the fire was started deliberately, and for all anyone knows she could have done it herself to snag some sympathy ), the KKK has a record of burning churches  but God has apparently told Conservapedia that the atheists did it! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo888 img="on">Accusing someone of drug use, perfectly okay. In fact, "keep up the good work"! Asking for an apology = a block for insulting behaviour. I guess calling someone an idiot was a compliment then? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo887 img="on">Ken to Jessica: "It's hard to resist the sweet reasonableness of a tender hearted Conservapedian of the female persuasion. :)" Awww, shucks! Ken's pretending to be straight!  Update:  Ken broke the link.  Updated. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo886 img="on">Oh, boy!  The new stupidity is out! UPDATE: Schlafly Statistics still to come? UPDATER Bullshit statistics are GO! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo885 img="on">Bugler: "You are an idiot" (and 61 other insults towards 4 sysops and a (formerly) respected editor) -- verbal warning for personal remarks

BRichtigen: Do (people) think that 'you are an idiot'? -- 1 day block for personal remarks

HelpJazz: "Do you see any incongruity here??" -- 1 WEEK block for personal remarks, Later unblocked, probably because we drew attention to it.

Conclusion: To avoid being blocked for personal remarks, make sure the remarks are really nasty. The nicer you are, the less Ed wants you to contribute to the project. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo884 img="on">Leadership, thy name is (not) Aschlafly. See also Trying to persuade a corpse <vote closed=yes poll=wigo883 img="on">Your meritocracy in action. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo882 img="on">Kotomi dons the blue beret Update: Ed Poor knows that it is not about him (but proves otherwise)Smack! Kotomi ups the ante. Update: Bugler replies: "I'm insulted that you call me a fascist, even if the things I say would make Mussolini proud." <vote closed=yes poll=wigo881 img="on">Muslims are on Conservapedia's side against the Evil Evolutionists. Perhaps the election of Barack ("Bin Laden") Obama isn't such an unmitigated disaster after all! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo880 img="on">Apparently mentioning criticism of how the Catholic church handles legal problems is now blasphemy. Been too long since we've had a good inquisition. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo879 img="on">Poor Ed finally gets fed up with reverting Tolkiendil's scholarship and permabans him for "inserting nonsense." That's a harsher sentence than the five years they gave to J "The One Ring represents true conservative principles" Bagnor. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo876 img="on">BUMP! Ed will regret this, as HelpJazz takes aim, and hits a bulls-eye! Update Special Ed never fails to disappoint. Actually, he's really disappointing, threatening everyone for tattling on poor Bugler. At least Phil got a laugh out of it. WHITEWASHED! Best moments: Ed reverts and Blocks BRichtigen... for using the exact same words that Bugler got away with scott free. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo878 img="on">Sweetness: Here's some random, nigh incomprehensible thoughts on Christmas. What do you think? Rod: Recreate your account with your real name. TK welcomed him after he was blocked. DanielGH: Ok. I did as you asked. Andy: 90/10. Revert. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo877 img="on">Epistemology, Assfly style: ...''more people agree that autumn foliage is beautiful than agree that 2+2=4. If you agree the latter is absolute, so is the former''. More American voters agree that Obama will make a good president than agree that Dubya was a good president or agree that McCain would have made a good president. What does that mean, Andy? <vote closed=yes poll=wigo875 img="on">“To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.”  That’s what our hero TK wrote. Careful Teacake. If teh Andrew Schlafly thinks you mean him he just might turn round and sting you. On second thoughts don’t worry. Assfly never sees anything worse than what teh flatterers tell him. <vote closed=yes poll=wigo874 img="on"> If you wish hard enough, ! <vote closed=yes poll=wigo873 img="on">TK: If you don't like my being added to liberal-bashing articles, too bad. It's Dramatic Irony, dammit, and th-th-th-that's all, folks. PS, TK doesn't understand Dramatic Irony at all

<vote closed=yes poll=wigo871 img="on">TK detects a sock and shows his reading skills: Well done: <vote closed=yes poll=wigo870 img="on">Lowkey throws a grenade at Aschlafly, when is block gonna happen? Update Andy shows leadership. Developing Ed makes a subtle grab for power? More Andy identifies the real problem - people spelling hell with a small 'h'. And in the meantime, even senior sysop CPAdmin1/Tim is about to go the way of the 90/10 Dodo.
 * 05:12, 11 December 2008 TK (Talk | contribs) blocked JPEngozi (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 5 years (account creation disabled) ‎ (Abusing multiple accounts: Aschlafly blocked StoryOfTheEye 5 years, this is sock of that user.)
 * 23:04, 10 December 2008 Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) blocked StoryOfTheEye (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 5 years (autoblock disabled) ‎ (Recreate your account with your real first name and last initial)

<vote closed="yes" poll=wigo867 img="on">Bugler brings the "awfullness (sic)" "Stimulated by an earlier discussion, I thought it would be an idea to try and work out a 'ranking of awfullness' here." Strangely, Bugler means Communist regimes of the 20th and 21st Centuries. It's those darn 8th century communists that were the worst... <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo866 img="on">God's got a can of woop-ass! New user page, probably won't be available for long. UPDATE: Gone in 600 seconds!

<vote closed="yes" poll=wigo865 img="on">TK: I have made a new rule that discussing blocks is verboten. BRichtigen: Say wha?  Bugler: BLOXORED!  Update Bugler unblocks. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo864 img="on">Ed deletes a mommy dearest quote, asking if it was chosen to marginalize her. All right, where's the dirty Atheist, Liberal, abortion loving scum who added that quote? Wait..... Andy how could you? <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo863 img="on">Irony meter alert! Quote mining proves that the Daily Telegraph is a 'typical Liberal British newspaper. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo862 img="on">Ed Poor, master of the art form known as the completely tangential edit comment, employs this medium to both talk to himself and dispense folksy wisdom. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo861 img="on">Well established Conservapedia users fear range blocks prevent large numbers of people editing Conservapedia and making it even funnier. TK doesn’t even try to answer the arguments. He deletes everything and reminds them the discussion is closed That’s typical TK stuff. UPDATE PJR hits back, then stops the harassment on another user's talk page. Moar: Naturally, Bugly gives his two cents. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo860 img="on">How many pounds of art can I put you down for? <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo859 img="on">PJR vs. Andy yet again, this time on Phil's turf. Phil reverts Andy, Andy reverts Phil. Phil reverts yet again, and again, Andy reverts Phil. Glove-slap: "Andy's edit comment and reply here are offensive, illogical, and unsubstantiated." Bugler: "Reverting ill-mannered deletion of material without asking Andy. Feel free" Update: Andy takes his displeasure to DEFCON 2 MOAR Phil, I never called you a liberal, you filthy, atheist liberal who denies the existence of hell! <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo858 img="on">Conservapedia, in a startling turn-around, is now criticizing, of all things, "anti-humanist" philosophies. Will they be stumping for atheism next? <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo857 img="on">"Hsmom, you ignoramus. ..." Andy sez: The article means what I want it to mean. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo856 img="on">PJR, when shortening a block: "Parody has it's (sic) place. (the parody in question) <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo855 img="on">Remember the Conservapedia editing contests? Category:Ships A-Bo (198 articles); C-Z (42 articles) <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo854 img="on">The "Tribune Co." files for bankruptcy. Somewhere in the cobweb-festooned reaches of this fellow's head, some statistic about the number of gays editing the New York Times has something to do with this... <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo853 img="on">Andy sez: "The Yale Daily News cites Conservapedia as an example a "user-generated content" that "needs to be taken more seriously...". Yale sez: "[http://www.yaledailynews.com/articles/view/26782 Another problem with user-generated content (and social networking in general) is the tendency toward groupthink. This is easy to see on political Web sites like Huffington Post or Conservapedia that are largely ideologically homogenous.]" Who do we believe? Bonus lulz for Andy cocking up his grammar on the front page for a change. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo852 img="on">PJR: I better change this template as it is being replaced. TK: Keep your hands off my fuckin' pages, you liberal Aussie scum. PJR: Oh, pretty pretty please most exalted and mighty Teacake, let me tidy up your little kitty litter tray sandbox. ( You wanker ) JM: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:TK&diff=next&oldid=581083 There, that's really so much nicer isn't it? Now we're all friends together!]'' TK: Oh fuck off, the pair of you. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo851 img="on">Conservapedia Deceit: Dismiss that which doesn't fit. Conservative adds a paragraph about Teen Challenge to the "Atheism and Mental and Physical Health" article, claiming a high cure rate of religious detoxification. Problem? "The 86 percent success rate . . . is misleading. It does not count the people who dropped out during the program. . . . [M]ost . . . have already been through detoxification programs. . . . In the program's first four-month phase, . . . 25 to 30 percent drop out, and in the next eight months, 10 percent more leave." <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo850 img="on">Go Ed go! Make that chart! It'll be like the list of who the haters hate. Aftersnark Does this mean Jews don't have to acknowledge Christians any more? MOAR Is Ed really using the word "negroes?" <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo849 img="on">Don't mention the FBI! It upsets the Assfly...Burn in Hell you liberal vandalist! <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo848 img="on">Bugler Gone Wild: In a report discussing a British advisor proposing new guidelines for what to teach children in primary school so they will have better skills when they reach secondary school, Bugler believes the intention of eliminating history from primary schooling is "that a knowledge of history will show them what socialism leads to". And Andy wonders why it's difficult to tell parody from reality with CP editors. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo847 img="on">This post goes a long way to explaining Andy's behavior. First, he thinks an album image of a nude child is "sexual," and second, he thinks that teenagers [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&diff=prev&oldid=581116 looking for porn go straight to... Wikipedia?] <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo846 img="on">Ed's been hittin' the hooch again <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo845 img="on">Ed Poor:Do this!. BRichtigen:Down with this sort of thing. TK:Careful now. BRichtigen:My time is not for thankless pricks! <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo844 img="on">Ed Poor's stubbing: "Racial equality": "Racial equality means equal treatment of people of different 'race's (i.e., white, Asian, red, brown, black). An attempt was made by Japan to add a 'racial equality clause' into the charter (or covenant?) of the League of Nations, but Australia and America opposed it." Besides the lack of history Ed Poor shows in why Japan tried to add such a clause (and why it was important in context of history, racial equality and the dissolution of the League of Nations), who the hell still calls people "red" or "brown" anymore? <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo843 img="on">Oh the stupid part deux! Another awful, grammatically challenged stub added to CP. The author of the page, RickD, pleads, "I really do love this book. I wrote it on wikipedia. I was desparate to make sure it had a chance to stay there. CP Editors, please feel free to remove the offending bits." Instead, the article implies the book does nothing more than try to find God, Christianity or faith in nearly everything and everyone, even when it introduces scientific concepts (such as minerals). UPDATE Ed reads WIGO. Moved to user space. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo842 img="on">Oh the stupid! But then again, why is this only something new on their site? <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo841 img="on">Today, Christmas trees. Tomorrow, the world! <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo840 img="on">"CP is not a dictionary" says Ed. O RLY? Get to work. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo839 img="on">Why bother writing an article when you can just make CP a glorified link farm? <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo838 img="on">Another sample of Law 101 at Conservapedia: means uploading an image found online to put into an article (note: No commentary on the photo itself, nor any fair use apparent on the only article linking it; no copyright or author information, either). As easily found with TinEye, the image was stolen from the cover of "Super-Duty Earthmovers" and cropped so as to remove the title, the author's name, and the words "Copyrighted Material". <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo837 img="on">The adulteress should have been stoned to death. Is that what Aschlafly thinks? Yes. C Palmer added a category, nothing more. Here's a better Christian explanation."Why not in the original gospel texts? The only speculation I have seen suggested is that this text was not included in a final gospel product because it seemed to have been too easy on those who committed sexual sin. However, I think a far more practical reason can be offered. In the process of composing his Gospel, Luke, following standard literary practice for the time, would have compiled notes which he later collected and collated into a full text. The pericope would be well designated as one of Luke's original 'loose leaf' notes that didn't make the cut to the final gospel. Why? The pericope fits quite well in the context where it is sometimes placed in Luke (after 21:38). But it is also immediately before the Passion narrative. Luke's Gospel is just about the right size for a typical ancient scroll, so the omission of this pericope from his Gospel may have been for a no less practical reason than that Luke saw that he was running out of writing room!" <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo836 img="on">Ed's advice to teh gays: Grow up and get married. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo835 img="on">Showing off his liberal style (namely, numbers 7, 12, 22, 37, 38 for conservatives, and 43), Andy mocks those complaining about the Romanian ministry's removal of the Theory of Evolution from high schools, and its replacement with theology class: "Sour grapes by the atheists. There is nothing wrong with requiring students to take religion classes, which would not require anyone to accept a particular religion as their own. But there is something wrong with requiring students to believe in evolution, as public schools do in the U.S." <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo834 img="on">Never one to miss a trick, Andy reminds us all today is Pearl Harbour Day... and that darn mooslum Obama got it wrong. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo833 img="on">Will it come true? A sysop's wet dream: don't complain <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo832 img="on">Ed Poor's new category: Movies with a gay cupid. "These movies feature a homosexual character - usually male - who unselfishly facilitates a heterosexual relationship." More Wikipedia bias shown, as the only movie Ed Poor includes in the category, My Best Friend's Wedding, does not list any homosexual or cupid categories on the liberal wiki. (end sarcasm) <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo831 img="on">Banwatch: RJJensen. Crime? Saying "RShlafly has fallen into liberal ways".

<vote closed="yes" poll=wigo829 img="on">No one believes in evolution. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo828 img="on">Arrogant Andy: "Thanks to a student's opinion, I've been able to capture yet another moment of deceitful liberal bias!" Maybe not?

<vote closed="yes" poll=wigo826 img="on">Who needs liberal media "experts?" a washed up Hollywood actor is the best source for analysis of the Iraq war. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo825 img="on">The mind of a Schlafly: San Francisco values if we like him, professor values if we don't. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo824 img="on">Hang on Andy. Aren't you always saying freedom is having the option of Jesus birth OR evolution? And not JUST Jesus birth? Update: Aww, it's cute! Kendoll really thinks he is responsible! Apparently, life really does imitate art. UPDATE AGAIN: That explains it, Andy doesn't object to indoctrination, just non-religious indoctrination. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo823 img="on">Roger Schlafly doesn't want you to know how badly the United States army treated Native Americans. The article about the Trail of Tears was like this. Roger emasculated the article to this sad stub. Will there be further developments? UPDATE Killing all the Indians? It was the the liberals' fault. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo822 img="on">How do you make sure that your beliefs (about atheists and charity) stay sound? Delete discussions focused on a major exception. UPDATE Burnt. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo821 img="on">Ed Poor's words to live by: "if you can't explain it to a ten-year old, it's probably wrong anyways." No wonder his writing class only lasted a week... <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo820 img="on">Yet more evidence of admitted insertion of opinion as fact. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo819 img="on">Uh-huh--just like all those bottles at the liquor store are "free samples"--stuff 'em under your shirt and run. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo818 img="on">And today in "How can we piss off all the well-meaning editors?", TK apparently accuses RJJensen of historical revisionism. (Self-correcting note: The category was first added here, but RJJensen re-inserted it) <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo817 img="on">The Axiom of Choice saga continues! Philip unbans AndyJM, Foxtrot complains, Philip playfully bans Foxtrot, BRichtigen chimes in, BRichtigen gets a 3-month block, aaaaand Foxtrot replies to Philip with "You do not know mathematics so leave it to those who do." Just... wow. Mandatory update: Bugler butts in and does his part to portray Philip as the nastiest sysop ever. *sets timer until TK joins in* Update: BRichtigen is back again - his block-log gets impressive <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo816 img="on">And modest - don't forget modest. That little line may speak more to Conservapedia's generally poor quality, than Ed's intelligence...Update: JArneal claims credit for the strokin' <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo815 img="on"> while twisted logic (aka "This is a web resolution image used purely for an educational article about the image subject by a non-commercial site; it is believed its use here does not impede the rights of the licence [sic] holder.") hurts the brain. DeanS should probably have read the licensing terms of LifeNews.com where he stole the image: "Use of LifeNews.com Content by Nonprofit Organizations/Pro-life organizations, churches, or other nonprofit groups that support the pro-life perspective may obtain a news licensing agreement to republish news from LifeNews.com in your newsletter at a lower cost." Educational use is not the same as posting the image freely on a website used by schools, but accessible by all. Isn't Andy a lawyer, and shouldn't he make this very clear to his sysops? <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo814 img="on">Philip J. Rayment, comedian. "Presumptions are not evidence." Uh, Phil? Pal? You're on Conservapedia, where Creation, resurrection and magical arks are considered truths, without any evidence. Such funny lines as, "Scientific evidence may not have been refuted, but evolution is mostly philosophy and story telling, with only a small amount of scientific evidence, most of which is also compatible with creation." <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo813 img="on">Geo Baggins : I fear that the crushing strain of the ring's power is too much for me. Gollum :  ''Oh master, let me help you. I'll take care of teh precious. Sméagol's good. Sméagol's kind. You can trust Sméagol. Geo Baggins:  Thank you Sméagol, it's such a relief.'' <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo812 img="on">Finally a maths article Ed can understand. UPDATE: Moved (for not being notable, despite being quasi-requested by a senior sysop) and burnt - but salvaged here at least. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo811 img="on">"Jumping on someone else's estimates while refusing to provide your own is a sign of bullying rather than open mind." From the same man that brought you "One need not propose an alternative, or a solution, in order to identify a flaw." <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo810 img="on">Ed Poor: a latter-day Jack Bauer ("YOU HAVE THREE WEEKS"). Of course, who promised to fill in the gaps is still banhammered,  who re-inserted the facts that got the first guy banned is blocked, and  is busy filing helpdesk tickets to combat all the abuse that gets article deleted and people banned for trying to help. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo809 img="on">Creating and deleting dozens of shout-outs to Gentlemen At Another Site? Totally fine. Asking who said gentlemen are? Banhammered for "Disingenuous mischief-mongering". One of ours, though. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo808 img="on">Koward-jou misspells words while calling us idiots. Karajou also seems to think racists must be Liberals. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo807 img="on">Normally we don't report wandalism here, but this is great. What do George W. Bush & Conservapedia have in common? Easy: they both prove the incompetence of conservatism. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo806 img="on">JessicaT said something like, "I do not like your deceitful linking, so I will simply ignore them and block you." No censorship here is there? If you follow the links they lead to counter arguments, for example, the conservapedia article tries to say that the Giraffe's neck could not have evolved. This was linked to an article explaining how scientists think the Giraffe's neck could have evolved.  <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo805 img="on">The abuse desk has become such an eyesore (450,000 central European users blocked, surely ONE of them is a conservative!), what with all those unanswered reports of abuse, that Geo archives it away. Ed helps with one section by deleting the article in question, so the abuse never happened. Problem(s) solved. Update: Andy is not pleased that somebody deleted the article. Prediction: It'll be restored, AndyJM/AlanS/BRichtigen will be found guilty (of something), Foxtrot will be praised, Ed will get away guilt-free. Yep, restored. Update: Ed realizes that his Crusade Against Knowledge ran into a wall there. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo804 img="on" img="on" img="on" img="on" img="on">Conservapedia is range blocking all over the place. Do they think the devil is at California University and in Central Europe? Yes! The devil must be in Saudi Arabia. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo804>DeanS quotes "Saxby's Win: 08's Most Intellectually Pure Contest" from an American Thinker article by C. Edmund Wright, filled with grammatical errors. Really, guys, "Democrat" is not an adjective. And quoting phrases like "bi-partisanship" with no context? Journalism integrity lacks at both sites. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo803 img="on">When Irish Creationists are smiling ? How far will they go for Google ratings ? apparently Ireland <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo802 img="on">The start of a potentially epic debate: PJR: "TK has no special authority when it comes to categories, his prior authority expired (and had likely been obtained by 'offering to accept the responsibility'), and whatever you do, don't let him drag you into private discussions behind closed doors." Update: Ed's reply to Philip's "No Andy, no private mail, TK isn't the leader" post? "Isn't TK the leader? Maybe you should send Andy a private mail." <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo801 img="on">Classic Ed Poor: A factual and sourced edit is reverted because Ed didn't like the edit summary. Update: Tim reverts Ed and puts back the factual and sourced material.

<vote closed="yes" poll=wigo799 img="on">PJR quietly asks where all the initial posts came from. And because PJR's one of the last okay guys on CP, we're happy to help him out: They came from the Chief Sysop's talk page. ;) Update: After PJR gives us a shout-out, TK wrongly claims that most posts on the page actually came from his old Category Sandbox (even though none of those posts were ever ported into the current discussion) and seems to think that PJR put the note there as an attack of some sort. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo798 img="on" img="on" img="on" img="on" img="off">So a humble user asks teh assfly for upload rights to add to his article. Will he get it? He might earn them, but only after another few hundred contributions! <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo797 img="on" img="on" img="on" img="on" img="off">You know you're in trouble if you're following advice. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo796 img="on" img="on" img="on" img="on" img="off">Wishful thinking: "Conservative Senator Saxby Chambliss won by a stunningly large margin: 57% to 43%. An early sign of the mid-term elections in 23 months?" Andy's meltdown continues. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo795 img="on" img="on" img="on" img="on" img="off">Ed: "Be very careful here, Dinsdale". You're in danger of violating another imaginary policy. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo794 img="on">No need to guess which side Roger chose when playing "Cowboys and Indians" as a child. How will this develop? They found an excuse to revert it but so far Ruby is unblocked? <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo793 img="on">" 09:15, 3 December 2008 Bugler (Talk | contribs) blocked Philip J. Rayment (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 3 days (account creation disabled) ‎ (Insulting Andy)" Rationalwiki has no comment at this time Update: "11:39, 3 December 2008 Learn together (Talk | contribs) unblocked Philip J. Rayment (Talk | contribs) ‎ (No authority to do so; please be mindful of chain of command))" <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo792 img="on">Aschlafly thinks that was a nice block. Note! He hasn’t tried to counter the arguments in the links that CharlesG made. Perhaps he knows he can’t. " <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo792 img="on">Run foul of Hitler? you might get demoted'' <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo791 img="on">Andy: "Ask a reasonable question huh? Well I guess the only way to answer that is with sarcasm. Someone dares to ask me to do something as stupid as be polite? Well take that and that" <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo790 img="on">"Left Hand, Right Hand" again: Ed "Destroyer of Articles" Poor walks into the Sci-Fi article, meets Ieuan and promptly blocks him for an hour. Ieuan is not amused and instantly gets a one-week block. And then cometh Karajou, who replies to the "not amused" post with "Now, why do I like this answer?" <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo789 img="on">Before engaging in a panegyric to his mother, Andy Schlafly discusses the space race. Highlights reel: referring to the moon landing as a "simulated broadcast of American Neil Armstrong stepping foot on the Moon", and calling Sputnik the first manned spaceflight. Epic fail. UPDATE: Andy corrects his own error (does he read the "place that shall not be named?"): "Sputnik unmanned" <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo788 img="on">Andy's new image source: Google Public Domain Image Library - ...wait, what? <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo787 img="on">From now on, December 2 will be known as "Everybody hates Henry" Day. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo786 img="on">Frey: "Why was that user blocked?" - TK: "MYOB." - Alan: "Here is the reason." - Henry: "Wait, what?" - Bugler: "SILENCE!" *blocks Alan* - Will: "Dude..." - Bugler: "I KEEL YOU!" Update: Wheel war in the block logs! Oh snap: TK: "The correct question is: Do any of you want to provoke me into some action I will not regret? " (actual quote) - while Henry requests backup from He Who Won't Listen. Slow learner's edition update: While Bugler suggests that Henry should be retired take a break, Liam steps into the minefield and promptly dies. Update More wheel wars. Tim unblocks. And: Andy speaks! His message? "73.1 million page views!!" Did anyone really think he'd actually focus on his guard dogs going nuts? Surprise, surprise: TK drags Henry into mail-space and retcon-justifies the initial block using information Rod didn't even have. Henry admits he was wrong.

<vote closed="yes" poll=wigo784 img="on">Is Ed making fun of Phil, or does he actually wear a yarmulke just for shits & giggles? <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo783 img="on">Ed has trouble with formatting <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo782 img="on">No more than a few hours after receiving MOAR POWER (Check user), TK immediately [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia_talk:Obama_straw_poll#It_is_time_to_end_this_foolish_endeavor._Now. starts to bully] other administrators. Some great statements in the section already: TK starts off the section with "CP has an owner, it is his absolute right to have whatever viewpoint he wants" and later hints that, as an administrator, means total agreement with Andy or else demotion should follow. Bugler helps by adding that "[Andy] is rightly the arbiter of what constitutes truth." Ed Poor joins in, which again are obvious attempts to protect TK and Bugler without naming/blocking them. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo781 img="on">[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Foxtrot#Blocking_for_username. Blocking oneself] to follow policy of recreating using first name and last initial to avoid hypocrisy, ideology, or abuse, is actually just like asking for equality in tests. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo780 img="on">Joaquin Martinez blocks Phil Rayment. Phil's reaction is the same as mine: "Huh!?" <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo779 img="on">It's spot the difference time!!! According to Ed Poor, closing gaps in elementary subjects in maths isn't good enough. Instead, you have to write articles on elementary subjects in maths. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo778 img="on">So much wrongness in just two posts by Bugler: Foxtrot is now considered to be a sysop, Bugler is in charge of the Abuse Helpdesk, and abuse tickets are handled by means of "Stop complaining and get back to work, scum!" <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo777 img="on">Consider this: the very definition of "insanity" is doing something twice, and expecting it to be different the second time. But, like the mouse taking a second bite at the electrified pellet, Andy welcomed TK back into the brotherhood of the banhammer. How many cheeks does this man have left to turn? Perhaps Aschlafly thinks TK understands now that little boys like TK can't go too far. TK may or may not have learned from those blocks. In any case TK is cleverer than teh Assfly and will win out. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo776 img="on">The Ed Poor method: start an article, then ask yourself to expand it.

<vote closed="yes" poll=wigo774 img="on">Ken fell asleep on the period key. <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo773 img="on">Ed's obsession with censoring information he doesn't like meets CP's great consensus system (a.k.a. "I have the banhammer, so I decide what consensus is."): Ed: "I don't like this movie. Let's merge it into obscurity." - Others: "Mh... maybe? Maybe not?" - Ed: "Nobody merges it, so I shall reduce it to a stub without merging the information anywhere." Which prompts others do some damage control with the result that Ed's merge "suggestion" went through anyway. Tangential update: "Needs moar scarlet letter!" <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo772 img="on">Greed is bad. A pity that they <vote closed="yes" poll=wigo771 img="on">Oh joy: Little by little, TK is working his way towards full power again. (And before anybody asks: Siteadmin = Can lock database) UPDATE: The stupid, it burns! Andy decides to drag in the wooden horse.