RationalWiki:The Great Conservapedia Cull

The successor to 2012's hit book-burning session, RationalWiki:Do we keep these CP-related articles?. In case you're wondering: yes, I take great joy in censorship and virulently hate 1,000% of Conservapedia-space. 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Articles which were on the 50/50 vote line and were kept are included here, with several new cull-ees stepping up to the chopping block.

Resolved articles at RationalWiki:The Great Conservapedia Cull/Resolved.

=A=

Delete

 * 1) Schlafly-cruft. (Best alternative would be merge into "Schlafly debate tactics" article, but then it'd just be concentrated cruft.) 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) If not keep, then merge. But there's no reason to delete this. Typhoon (talk) 09:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Quite hilarious to see what teh Assfly thinks he knows. --JorisEnter (talk) 10:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Not yet. Hclodge (talk) 11:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 4) --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Merge/Redirect

 * 1) If not keep, merge with Schlafly debate tactics. It's important because it demonstrates Assfly's ability to bullshit. Old guard (talk) 23:59, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Delete

 * 1) Unnecessary. 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Valuable resource for future CP researchers. Hclodge (talk) 11:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Goat

 * 1) I don't know why we have this, quite honestly. Old guard (talk) 00:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe to prove that Conservapedia:Article matrix is true? 00:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * So you're saying it's essential for that page? Typhoon (talk) 09:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) The only reason to delete this is if you have no idea what the Lenski Affair was or its direct relationship to RationalWiki's mission. Old guard (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Shit, meant to vote merge. 00:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) This article is highly informative about what a huge fiasco their attack on Lenski was. Typhoon (talk) 09:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) The Lenski affair attracted wider internet coverage.  Генгис   22:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Hclodge (talk) 11:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 4) --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Merge/Redirect

 * 1) With the main Lenski affair article. 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) --Owlman (talk) 06:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) This is just a page of links. Some of them can go into "See also" and "External links" on the Lenski affair page. Spud (talk) 10:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Goat
=B=

=E=

Keep

 * 1) If CP can have a very long article on "Examples of Bias in WP" then this article is a well-deserved counterpoint. Hclodge (talk) 11:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Merge/Redirect

 * 1) Conservapedia 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Agree, mergeinto Conservapedia proper. Not really stand-alone material. Old guard (talk) 00:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Too short. Typhoon (talk) 09:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 4) This obviously belongs in the CP article itself. --JorisEnter (talk) 10:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 5) Agreed. Doesn't need an article to itself. Some of it must be a bit out of date now too. Spud (talk) 10:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 6) --Owlman (talk) 20:22, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Goat
=J=

Delete

 * 1) Shitty stub. 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Do we need an article on every CP editor?--JorisEnter (talk) 10:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) We most definitely do not need articles on every Conservapedia user. I am reminded of the old Rationalwikiwiki pages with the "Stalk this user" template on them. Yes, he's still active. But, so what? Spud (talk) 10:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Still active there. Old guard (talk) 00:11, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Just go and delete every stub. Typhoon (talk) 09:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Hclodge (talk) 11:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 4) --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Goat
=O=

Keep

 * 1) concise article on key topic. Hclodge (talk) 11:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Merge/Redirect

 * 1) Move to Conservapedia:Ed Poor. 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 2) Don't delete examples of Ed's endless stupidity. Move it or keep it. Typhoon (talk) 09:38, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 3) Hilarious but could go under Ed's own article. --JorisEnter (talk) 10:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 4) Agreed. It doesn't need a page to itself. It goes onto the Uncle Ed page. Spud (talk) 12:40, 28 January 2016 (UTC)