Talk:Michael Egnor

Kicking ass and taking names. Nice article! 03:48, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Would now be a good time to reveal that I am in fact a sockpuppet of Nebuchadnezzar, and that therefore my article on massage was pristinely perfect and required no intervention by senior editors?-- 03:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No, since it wasn't and needed basic copyediting. And what does that have to do with this article?  04:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * "Senior editors"? 04:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * (ec)Thank you, my good man. I would have gone into Egnor's arguments further since they cross over into psych/neuroscience, but Novella has so thoroughly demolished them in so many ways so many times (and a lot of them are PRATTs anyway) that I couldn't be arsed, as they say. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 03:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I love a new article that I can't find a single damn typo or grammage thing to fix.   04:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

An article by him
I recently found an article by Michael Egnor in the godandscience.org website where he presents a clinical case as evidence for mind-brain dualism. There are some things that I don't understand about the article. --Jagoe (talk) 15:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "For example, both dualism and strict materialism predict that severe brain injury will often severely impair mental function." I don't understand why dualism necessarily implies that mental function will be altered.
 * The difference between "brain function" and "mental function."
 * How an fMRI makes a case for mind-body dualism.