Talk:Modern frauds in science

I'm suggesting a delete - I'm not sure this guy is that well known, but i'm not a science person, so maybe he really needs a full article.Godot   Grow a vagina 19:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * But deleting stuff is bad, remember? The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 19:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Since when? [[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]Godot    Grow a vagina 19:02, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Since everyone yelled at me for my deletionism. The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 19:07, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * What you need to understand HK is that you can't just walk in and delete stuff that has been around here for a while; it may not be very good but people may have affection for it and require some sort of consensus to delete. Even if you get a majority of four or five in a short time you need to wait for others to make their views known, especially as we are a 24-hour wiki with editors from around the world. New stuff which is obscure, not on mission or poorly written does not need the same criteria for deletion. 19:15, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Frauds and hoaxes
I think we might consider a single article on frauds and hoaxes, and have redirects from these guy's names. When I googled Viktor, I got redirects to Schon Incident, and several other scandals. I knwo there's the UK scandal about vaccination (not sure which)... all of these might be one good article. They are right now, bad stubs.Godot   Grow a vagina 19:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You would be thinking of Andrew Wakefield.  19:18, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

This article is a bit of a duplicate
of this. P-Foster Talk " Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing. " 19:48, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Want that we should make this a sub section of the other? Or even just delete it all together?  [[Image:Pink mowse.png|25px]]Godot    Grow a vagina 20:35, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Should this not be List of modern frauds in science? Peter Monomorium antarcticum 22:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit
It is not pseudoscience, HK, it is bad science - there is a difference. Additionally, your heading style looks terrible when there aren't half a dozen things in each year. Better would be "Andrew Wakefield (1998)" and leaving it at that. Peter Monomorium antarcticum 23:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)