Talk:Skoda's law

Nice. Does the originator know about this article? 07:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Did the originator write this article? 08:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps. In which case I shall be coining my own law shortly. Not sure what it is, perhaps that one about deconvoluting double negatives... 08:41, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I suggest this one goes bye-bye sleepy sleepy into the archive of "who cares?" So says me.  Not so useful, but catching up on Eno Lirpa.  08:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I like it. And it's no more or less valid than any of the others that people have just "made up". Hell "DeMeyer's law" got into the Telegraph article and we know for a fact that it just isn't used anywhere at all. 08:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but this one is simply stupid. 09:22, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It's just a very watered down Godwin's law. I think we should rewrite this so it's a string of Skoda jokes. Totnesmartin (talk) 10:26, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Or delete it... 10:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Contrary to what people have been saying, there should be some notability limit for RW content.  "Laws" that someone on Facebook made up yesterday don't cut it.  If the comment is worth preserving, put it in the chemtrails article, but don't include the real name of some FB user who probably didn't mean for his comment to appear anywhere other than at FB.   11:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * In all fairness, if you make a comment on FB with your real name, you're making the comment under your real name as much as you're making your comment with a handle elsewhere. Secondly, I imagine that same point applies to Nathan Poe just as much, I assume he never meant his comment to get famous. 11:22, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe so, but it did get famous. I can't see the same thing happening with this comment.   11:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

(undent) I'd say delete. Looks more like a snappy remark that belongs as a clever email signature rather than an article, at least until it's possible to do a Google search for "Skoda's law" and find more than one result (unrelated). -- 12:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Done.  18:02, 2 April 2010 (UTC)