Essay:Why RationalWiki needs more weather articles

RationalWiki needs more weather articles. For example, we have two hurricane articles (one of which, I will admit, I started a failed AFD on. To make it worse, hurricanes do add on to global warming, and some of them might be missional! That page mentions the 1997-98 and 2015-16 El Nino's. While they probably don't deserve an article, El Nino and La Nina probably do. It's sad to know that Uncyclopedia has more, even before I joined, although most of my weather articles have between deleted. (Although some do stand). (I might get around to creating a few at some point).

Outside hurricanes, it gets even worse. No blizzard articles, only one tornado article (and that's a stretch), although I understand the lack of missionality as a matter or fact, it foes not have to do with global warming, as tornadoes are becoming less common! 2020 and 2016, the warmest years on record, were ~200 and ~275 tornadoes below average. We also don't have too much more storm related stuff at global warming.

Why weather articles are missional
Point 4 applies, in the sense that reactions from hurricanes in the media. As an example, take, which the media was criticized for overhypping the storm. Point 1 can also apply, depending on how it relates to global warming.

Maybe it's not missional but it could apply in fun space!
That's true. Maybe not the most missional thing ever, but it doesn't need to be missional to be in fun space! All it needs is to be....not hate speech or whatever. They could use it. Redirects are optional. This would ensure we have a large supply, but not to interfere with missionality.

Bottom line is
We need more weather articles. It isn't clear how, but there are ways, there has to be a way for it to work, somehow. Or maybe just more mentions of weather would be our best.