User talk:Pink/Archive III

Cheers
Thanks for your assistance, by the way. Appreciated. Have a delightful, non-Nightwish (although perhaps slightly Nightwish-esque) song. -- 15:01, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * That was very Nightwishy. Judging by your comment, I thought for a second it would be Evanescence.
 * Anyway, you have forced me to retaliate: Have at ye! 16:09, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, that was certainly... unsual. I'm not even entirely sure how to categorize that, so I guess I'll call it a video installation and leave it at that.
 * And now for something completely different! This is not Nightwishy-washy at all, promise. -- 16:25, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Definitely not Nightwishy, but I'm not sure it's an improvement, either :P Have a sort-of-jellyfish-themed song. 16:44, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * What? You don't like Safety Dance? But it has midgets and Morris dancing and everything in it? Anyway, considering your apparent taste for the somewhat serialistic... -- 17:12, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed, it is very slow. I've only just finished watching your Philip Glass thingy.
 * Did you mean "surrealistic" by any any chance?
 * Anyway, I sink your battleship :P 17:42, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * No, "serialistic" as in continually repeating a certain theme or passage. Also, I see your battleship (if you have one) and raise you an actual battleship. -- 18:00, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * "Continually repeating a certain theme or passage"? Kevin Shields must be rolling in his... bedsit.
 * Also... Pet Shop Boys? The Battleship Potemkin? I'm not sure you're taking this seriously, Anders. Anyway, I haven't seen all of this one yet, because of The Slow, but it looks great so far. Surrender, you fool! 18:34, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * The message in that one seemed more than a little COMMUNIST! I suggest you stop trying to hide your true loyalties beneath a thin veneer of avantgardist respectability and instead embrace them overtly. -- 18:44, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Avantgardist, is it?
 * I expect I'll lose some points for that :) Anyway, I vote we stop now and have an impartial third party decide who's won (me) . 20:08, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I vote we don't stop. I haven't even had time to pull out the big guns yet.
 * However, since I'm at work right now, at a workplace that mysteriously doesn't appreciate the many joys of YouTube, I counter-propose that we postpone the competition for a few hours.
 * I must also respectfully challenge your suggested arbiter. -- 04:18, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I started with the "big guns", so I hereby stick my tongue out at you. We can keep going later if you really want, but I think it's a forgone conclusion.
 * And what arbiter would you suggest? 04:27, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I'd suggest me, because I like you both equally. Therefore I am a fair and neutral party.   04:32, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You can only be the judge if you like me more. That was the premise of the discussion. See liberal stupidity. 04:37, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You call a video artist whom no one has ever heard of a "big gun"? Absurd. RA will be fine as an arbiter. Although maybe we need an arbiter to appoint an arbiter? -- 04:41, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I meant more in terms of songs than videos. I think this person would make a good judge for who gets to be the arbiter. 04:55, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Video, music, same thing. I'd never heard of them. We could also hold a new song war to determine the arbiter of the arbiter of our song war. -- 04:59, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * If I may be permitted to get needlessly pedantic for a moment, I note that you are assuming:
 * 1) Your own experience is a flawless indicator of popularity.
 * 2) Popularity is not irrelevant to art.
 * So :P
 * Anyway, I think RA has "chosen himself", which seems to neatly cut through any fiddly bureaucracy we might have invented, even if it is fairly unfair. I vote for RA as supreme arbiter. 05:06, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I fail to see any problem at all with those assumptions.
 * But I agree with your proposal. Let us consider RA elected arbiter by acclamation. -- 05:38, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Gladly do I accept.  05:43, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * AK: The second one is outright false, as you would accept if it weren't for Liberal Denial. How many more rounds shall we have? How shall we judge the entries? 05:47, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I think we should leave that up to the arbiter. That's what arbiters are for. But I expect, then, that you at least agree that my first assumption is true? -- 05:50, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * No, it's a generalisation. And what if he makes the wrong decision? We need rules, dammit! 05:52, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Ok, I can see your point. I propose the establishment of a proper Rules Commission to work out a set of rules. -- 05:54, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

[undent]Please devote a new page to your contest. All RW is watching you. (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 05:56, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Another generalisation :) Anyway, I think this sort of thing is more suited to talk pages. The limelight would kill it. Kill it, I say. Perhaps we should have two arbiters, though? If Ed is interested. 06:04, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Absolutely not. I have already filled my Youtube quota for the week. (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 06:27, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * "YouTube quota"? What an exotic concept. You can be chairman of the Rules Commisson, then. -- 06:29, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I think we should give that post to a mongol chieftan. 06:32, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * A mongol chieftain probably knows better than me anyway what this contest is about. (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 06:33, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Primus, I don't think we have any Mongol chieftains immediately available. Secundus, I fail to see what actual knowledge about the contest has to do with being on the rules commission. -- 06:39, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Tertius, all I wanted was free tickets to the front row and some popcorn kindly offered by the contestants. (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 06:44, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Ok, I guess we can let you off the hook, then. -- 14:36, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Song war, round 2
We continue this competition just long enough for my honoured opponent to concede his defeat. This should be a pure formality, really. -- 14:36, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * It took me ages to find my next one -- mostly because for a while I tried to "out-complicate" you, which did not work at all. Instead, I am sticking with my tried-and-tested policy of choosing a song and then finding an OK video for it. Huzzah! 21:35, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * BO-ring! No development, nothing happens. Also, you seem to be deluding yourself into thinking that the Bach can be competed with. In any case, here's Suzanne!. -- 04:03, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * If you want to field Bach as some kind of "uncompetable-with" champion, you might try selecting something good, like Air.
 * Suzanne Vega? Suzanne Vega? That's practically a Rickroll. You realise she doesn't age, don't you? She isn't human! Kill it! But since you brought us to the eighties, I suppose I must follow suit. 04:32, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I owned two Vegas, both silver wagons...  ħ uman  04:52, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. The eighties... and just a little bit further back. -- 07:33, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Not bashing or anything, but... don't you Danes have some sort of inferiority complex, given the success of Swedish, and to a minor extent Norwegian, Finnish and even Icelandic, singers and bands? (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 07:42, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I mean, the only musician from Denmark I "know" is... Carl Nielsen. (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 07:43, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Sure we do! We compensate by only listening to our own crappy artists and ignoring all those furriners.
 * But surely you must have heard of Aqua? We've had some rather successful jazz musicians, too, if you're into that. -- 07:46, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Hmm you are right, but I wouldn't boast with Barbie Girl. Sorry for jazz, you are way ahead other Nordic Countries in that, both in artists and in venues/recordings (a Copenaghen Chet Baker session on my night table at the moment). (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 07:52, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * And not to forget the late opera soprano Inga Nielsen. -- 08:27, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * ABBA...
 * I get the feeling you're not really taking this seriously, Amaranth. Anyway, I found something much nicer. The video doesn't really match it and the vocals have far too much reverb, but you choose ABBA for Christ's sake, so :P 08:56, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes. I like ABBA. :-(
 * Well, here's a classic.
 * I must admit, though, that I'm a little unclear on the exact criteria for this competition. Are we simply competing on who can find the most awesomest (!) songs to throw after the other, or something a little more involved? -- 09:17, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Is it just me, or was that song about chess? :)
 * The rules are only that we playing without explicitly defining the rules, so do feel free to carry on as you are now. I'm taking us back to the nineties again -- keep your arms and legs on inside until the vehicle has come to a complete stop and please ignore the haircuts.
 * Disclaimer: Not britpop in any way, shape or form, despite the tags. 10:19, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Britpop? >_>
 * Britpop! -- 10:39, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Blur: are shite. 10:49, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm running away escaping leaving my front row place but taking your popcorn with me. Have you heard from the Judge lately? I fear he ran away  escaped "had an urgent meeting", after seeing what he should have to endure. (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 10:58, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You mean Rational Afikomen? He's probably asleep. And please don't run away escape leave your front row seat just yet, Ed -- I peeked at Anders' hand while he was gone, and his next choice is a Jewish hymn sung backwards. it's going to be legendary.  11:05, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I trust you Chaos!. I'll stay just for the Jewish hymn sung backwards. Does it have a satanistic message like the Beatles song sung backwards? (too embarassed to sign, (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 11:15, 3 July 2008 (EDT) )
 * No, it merely glorifies the one true Dog. 11:40, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I have no idea what my honoured opponent is talking about, but I don't play hymns backwards, Jewish or otherwise. That's just so 70's, you know?
 * Now here's some good stuff. You'd have to be both blind and deaf to not like this. -- 11:52, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * No, I managed it without those two advantages.
 * I can't help thinking this song would be much better without the vocals. 13:15, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I'll bet you can't! You seem to be pretty anti-vocals generally, don't you?
 * Guess you'll just love this one, then. -- 14:21, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * If I had my way, you two-legs would never speak.
 * That song should really be accompanied by a company of homeless orphans dancing while a chained bear flogs them. Ans an accordion. Also, I will retaliate when I've had some sleep, if it's all the same with you. 16:21, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Of course. I am nothing if not magnanimous in my impending victory. -- 16:43, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Please, AKjeldsen, would you be so kind to leave Finnish music alone, instead of showing the worst of it? (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 16:49, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * The worst? Not at all. Ieva's Polka is a great piece of a cappella music. -- 17:04, 3 July 2008 (EDT)
 * The worst? Not at all. Ieva's Polka is a great piece of a cappella music. -- 17:04, 3 July 2008 (EDT)

Round Three -- TREACHERY!

 * Well, Sir - as it has now been three days since my last entry with no further opposition, I believe I can claim victory in this competition under the ancient laws of the Internet as laid down by the Elder Ones. Thank you for playing. -- 19:10, 6 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Never, sir! We shall resume our melee immediately!
 * Take that, foul knave!
 * Postscript: I'd rather not live in a world where I can only mention Ulrich Schnauss once. The video's excellent anyway, so I defy you to complain :P 04:07, 7 July 2008 (EDT)
 * The video was indeed excellent, but unfortunately that's not what we're competing about here. I must admit that I find it hard to see the appeal in these massive electronic tapestries of music that hardly changes at all. That being said, I assume we both live in reasonably free countries, so you are of course free to mention this "Ulrich Schnauss" as much as you like.
 * And now, time for some classic piano with David Tudor! -- 10:26, 7 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Why should music change? I don't understand your objection.
 * Anyway, I destroy your champion by exposing it to its exact antithesis. Basic alchemy. 13:12, 9 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I interject with and .  14:09, 9 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Both of which are silly :P I don't think we can make it a three-way songwar, either -- how will it be judged?? 14:26, 9 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Is it being judged now?
 * This next song may not be entirely in season. I intend to handle that issue by ignoring it entirely. -- 14:31, 9 July 2008 (EDT)

Orange box!!! Woot!

 * Indeed. 20:08, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Orange box
Orange box

I left a new reply regarding your "gift" on my talk page. I was going to send you a very important email, but this was easier.  ħ uman  19:39, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * So you did. 20:08, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

I was going to send you a very important email, but this was easier.
I was going to send you a very important email, but this was easier. ħ uman  19:39, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, you said. 20:08, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

You should put a link to your talk page in your signature, also
You should put a link to your talk page in your signature, also.  ħ uman  19:39, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I reject your suggestion. Someday I may tell you why. 20:08, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Problem solved!  04:47, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm afraid I reverted you. There's not supposed to be a talk link. 05:00, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Faith
It wasn't Human who added that, it was Proxima Centauri, in one of her typically astoundingly naive and presumptive assertions about religion. 05:23, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I know. Human reverted your removal, so I took the case to him. The whole Faith article just amazes me at the moment. 05:25, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Really? I'm surprised—I thought he was one of the more tolerant atheists here.  But then again, he can be harshly judgmental if you catch him in one of his moods...   05:29, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * LOL! No, he's definitely plotting against you. Plot plot plot -- that's him! He also called you a "pastry thief", even though I begged him not to. 05:35, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * And just who are you impersonating?  05:37, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * TK, you toffee-hammered pinion. The "* LOL!" thing is practically his trademark, along with vague references to plotting on the part of Human/Trent/CatWatcher/Flippin. 05:39, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Forgive me if I avoided associating with TK too much. And I make a point of not paying attention enough to Conservapedia to pick up little quirks like that.   05:42, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You don't know what you're missing, Radman. It's a marvellous vista of unrelenting chaos. 05:45, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I would rather not waste my time with loonies who are not representative of the people I do meet and have an actual shot at affecting the lives of.  06:23, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Don't be so practical. It's bad for the skin, you know. 06:25, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Don't be so liberal. It's bad for the eyes, you know.   06:26, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Don't copy me. 06:30, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

My reversion on "faith" may have been an accident, due to reverting "footnotes" to "references". But maybe not. I see it has all been fixed now... and even "improved"!  ħ uman  19:31, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

I just left you another very important comment on your blog. Thank you for your attention.
I just left you another very important comment on your blog. Thank you for your attention. -- 07:51, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Jellyblog Blogroll
Add links via this page. --λινυσ (☮) 16:09, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

Littlefish
What have I done wrong, I noticed she has recently expanded the Kosher article a lot, she earlier expanded the Orthodox Judaism article, and she never edits early on the saturday or late on friday (keeping the shabbat) (she claims to be a seventh day adventist but she can't fool me, I am Jewish and therefore have Jewdar) --Jellyfish 15:57, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * : mild facepalm:
 * Do you also have libertariandar? That one might be interesting. Anyway, I am near-certain that Deborah is not Jewish, despite her recent interest in the subject. You'd have to ignore logic to disagree! :) 16:06, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

I admit some of the things I said were joking like that there is a Jewish conspiracy at Conservapedia. Look at the evidence 1:She never edits on the Sabbath 2:She has a Jewish name 3:She recently did a major expansion of Kosher 4:She in the past did a big expansion of Orthodox Judaism 5:She recently copied the articles for Hillel and Shammai from Jewish Encyclopedia 6:Most people who edit articles about Judaism are Jews 7:My Jewdar says she is Jewish 8:Fox's Jewdar says she is Jewish --Jellyfish 16:35, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I fixed your line breaks. You're welcome.
 * If you must discuss this conspiracy, you should either enable your email or invent some kind of elaborate carrier-pigeon method. We don't know how dangerous Deborah might be if provoked! If she's copying articles from the Jewish Encyclopedia, I wouldn't put anything past her :P 16:43, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * If I prove the conspiracy can I become a sysop --75.38.55.80 17:03, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't see why not. But I never get made sysop for proving my conspiracy theories. 17:06, 8 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You've been sysoped plenty of times, you just always ask to be de-sysoped. 13:19, 9 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Yep :) But I've never been sysopped for a conspiracy theory. Please stop spreading your Liberal simplification on this site, Pinto. 13:28, 9 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't think I've ever actually seen a conspiracy theory from you, you know. -- 14:02, 9 July 2008 (EDT)
 * They're seekrit. 14:04, 9 July 2008 (EDT)

I couldn't help but notice...
...that you're really on a roll with those artistic welcoming messages, aren't you? -- 17:41, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, great; now I owe you two songs. Not really fair, Anders. 17:46, 12 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I was so tempted to put in a link to Scarborough Fair here, because you really set yourself up for that. But I didn't. Because I care. -- 17:52, 12 July 2008 (EDT)

You might enjoy
this, considering your recent ssensdrawkcab. Not quite the same, but still. ThunderkatzHo! 21:26, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 * .evorppa hsifyllej eW !tnellecxE
 * !gnivlossid si niarb yM .tsol ohw snettik eht rof yrros gnileef flesym thguac I tub ,rawnettiK ot tnew I ,ereht morF

Parakeets


Here. Hope you're satisfied now. -- 17:44, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
 * ?sgnitirw ruoy mrofrep uoy nehw os tegdif uoy tsuM .dlihc ,yffurcs etiuq si erutangis ruoy tuB .efil ym fo tnemom tseippah eht si sihT
 * It's quick to write, and that's what matters when you have to sign as much crap during the day as I do. Actually, I took extra care with this one - my usual signature is much worse. -- 17:52, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
 * !srednA ,ffuts yracS .egdirf eht no evael thgim etamtalf degnihnu na taht eton a ekil skool ti sekam tI .)taht tseuqer did I fi neve( eciwt ti etorw uoy yaw eht evol I
 * Fortunately (or not?), I have never had any unhinged flatmates. But yes, it does have that air to it. I think much of it is due to the scanning, though - it looks much less interesting in reality. -- 18:00, 15 July 2008 (EDT)



Even greater satisfaction is assured!  ħ uman  21:46, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
 * .won ,yllis ylsuoregnad gnimoceb si sihT

Wimp
You do realize that if you were truly commited you would fuck with your templates like I did when I went HAHA crazy. -- Gen. S.T. Shrink   Get to the bunker  20:57, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
 * ): relletyrotS ,ecnalab etaciled a s'tI .ereh pihsrotide eht etaneila yletelpmoc ot tnaw t'nod I .haN
 * Eh. Pussycat. -- 21:05, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
 * .uoy knahT ...wA

So is there some website you go to to flip your sentences? (look at that impressive "to to", though that's like ending a sentence with a preposition, and probably should be "... website to which you go to flip ..", but I digress) Or do you do the entire thing by (virtual) hand? I'm curious to know how much of your life you've wasted on this, shall we say, youthful indiscretion. ThunderkatzHo! 23:48, 15 July 2008 (EDT)
 * )hcum yrev os uoy knaht( soahc ecruostuo ton od hsifyllej ew ,eromrehtruf dnA .od I tahw s'tI .epyt I
 * --Interiot 02:33, 16 July 2008 (EDT) ˙(ɹʇuɔ ɾɹɐ lz ǝqs ʇɥʎɔ) ɹɐq ɟ,ɹǝɹn

Hey look!
It's you!

Or is it? -- 06:01, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Nope. I'm quite flattered that my name has filtered into Karajou's paranoia circuits, though. But... not the best time to make me look like an evil sockpuppeteer. Marginally Less Chaos!Audacity! 06:57, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
 * My theory is they're using dice. They probably have a whole table with all the RW users drawn up, and just roll a d20 every time they need a suspect. -- 07:04, 17 July 2008 (EDT)

Why are you up on a monday morning? And could you hit me on the head so i have an excuse to go home?--WaitingforGodot 10:02, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, if it's time for Pong, that's cool with me. All I'm doing is looking up legal references for some silly Response to a case I know nothing about.  Course, now with teh Ping-pong chat, people will think I'm talking to myself.  sheessh.  Just what I need, written confirmations that I'm in need of help. --WaitingforGodot 10:16, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I beg to differ that i am a sock. a shoe, perhaps.  High-healed stiletto, if possible please.  You can tell the Intenet was made by men - who wants to be a stinky sock puppet?  euuu.  --WaitingforGodot 10:32, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, yes. I can see how Nasty and Pointy might have serious effect on a Jelly.  Though I remain dubious about the "warm comfy" part of socks.  Sweaty and smelly (at least if you are a sock of MINE) perhaps.  I really must get a life.  Wonder if anyone has any for sale. --WaitingforGodot 10:38, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Then my iphone would be chronically set for 9-11. Danger Will Robinson!  Course, I do try to explain to my fellow paralegals about the Social Life that is DailyKos and Ratwiki.  They remain dubious.--WaitingforGodot 10:48, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 * DailyKos? you must ask? Well, duh.  by it's name you can see that it is a daily report of teh activities of Russian (Soviet, actually) космонавт. Sheesh, don't you pay attention to anything other than being chaotic?--WaitingforGodot 10:59, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 * That's OK, I spent all of last week changing links into safe links. aren't I productive.  Oh, and I spent all of my free sunday regrouting some tiles.  so as I say, that "life" thing falls under my #1 on the "to shop for" lists.  If backwards is done, what is the plan for this week?  Russian? --WaitingforGodot 11:08, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, well, I can see how the sillyness fails after so many things done in your places. Perhaps if you next provided people with Three Free Ginsu steak knives thrown in if you order RIGHT NOW" might get you new orders for your brand of chaos!.--WaitingforGodot 11:15, 21 July 2008 (EDT)
 * мир in lifesize? wow.  I could use some Peace right about now.  Isn't it ironic you name a space ship, "world".  ok, must write a letter in teh "real world".  keep your edit window on this same bat station and i shall enjoy revisiting later! --WaitingforGodot 11:26, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

My Carpet
Yeah. I don't get it. I see you went on a cryptic posting on people's talk pages spree. Nope. Still don't get it. Anyway, thanks for making me think that something interesting was going on for a second. Good luck with your seemingly nonsensical message campaign Exasperate me!Sheesh! Not the most impressive contributor here 11:53, 21 July 2008 (EDT)

Sysopship
You gave me the delete button when I can't use the edit properly? Well thanks any way. I would also like to thank the random forces that brought the universe into existence... ::sound music:: $\approx$$\pi$ 02:41, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Don't mention it! 02:44, 24 July 2008 (EDT)


 * I don't want to be a sysop. I have sysopping socks on another site and that's enough sysopsis for me thank you very much. Auld Nick 09:28, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

Clean up your mess
... There's jelly all over this Wiki. Proxima Centauri 08:18, 24 July 2008 (EDT)

Slow down
02:58, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I only did a couple -- good picks too, I think. I'm going to shed all my mighty powers in a minute... 03:01, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Mmm...? 03:02, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Don't you say "Mmm" at me, young lady. 03:05, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Young! No particular objections but WFG's only been here a few days & don't think AKJ'll thank you, he had to be forced into sysopship. 03:09, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Godot's spawned a huge amount of text in the last few days, regardless of how long she's been here. I'm sure AK won't really mind...
 * Oh great, now you've introduced Doubt into my mind... Whyever did he not want to be a sysop?
 * Besides... I wonder if I might discretely draw your attention to some recent sysopings from someone who shall remain nameless... slight improvement, perhaps? 03:16, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Gawd, Susan, did you make the medusa a 'crat? Hehehehe...  ħ uman  03:41, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * No I EFFIN' didn't 03:43, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Twas Trent. Hee hee hee! 03:44, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I didn't want to be a sysop because I'm a lazy bastard. Also, I fear responsibility. Now what's this you've done that I probably won't thank you for? ::suspicious:: -- 04:11, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Nothing. Carry on about your business, you scallywag.
 * Might have made you a bureaucrat... 04:13, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Wha...? But if, or how... who made you...?


 * Okay. I haven't had my coffee yet. I'll go get my coffee. That's what Jesus would do. -- 04:18, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Jesus Drank Coffee? Cool.  Now if only I can find a text where he ate Chocolate Crossiants, then my morning will be part of the Jesus Diet.
 * * Sceptical expression*
 * Actually that's a good idea. I shall maketh the bean-drink also. 04:20, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh well. I guess it's not that big a step from sysop to 'crat.


 * So where are all my nifty new buttons? Are there special privileges? Do I get a personal barrista? Corner office? Can I order people executed? ::just a bit too eager...:: -- 05:10, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Really the only new things you can do are Rename and User Rights Management. I thought it would be appropriate just because most of the cabal (everyone but you, really) are bureaucrats, in keeping with their status in the community. You could probably have some fun by demoting Human a little -- but he's a bit grumpy at the moment, so it might be wise not to. 05:25, 24 July 2008 (EDT)

You didn't have to fall on your sword! 05:00, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I kept my sysop, actually. I don't know why -- sentimentality? I'll probably drop it in a few hours. 05:25, 24 July 2008 (EDT)

Whoa
Are you sure this was a good idea? -- 05:41, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I hope you're not trying to demonstrate your unsuitability. You've gone all "Look, I broke the plates! I probably shouldn't do the washing up from now on..."
 * Please rename me back. I feel this moniker is quite unsuitable :P And also, you're being uncharacteristically chaotic. If anything, you should be called "Perfect Order!" 05:49, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Forgot to change the bits of that comment that became redundant after the "edit conflict". Sry. 05:49, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't think I broke anything. It's more like my dog threw up on your carpet or something.


 * Please stand by while I delete the redirects. -- 05:51, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Be careful!! 05:51, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Jesus Christ. In retrospect, I should probably have done this to someone with fewer user pages. -- 05:56, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Don't take the Lord's name in vain(veign? vane? it's a magical mystery!) Daneman. 05:58, 24 July 2008 (EDT)

I ought to promote you BOTH to vandal. Have you SEEN recent changes? 06:00, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, yes. Quite impressive. I must admit I hadn't expected that much of an effect. -- 06:05, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Hey, Fellyjish, don't forget to leave a link to the guide for new sysops at your newly anointed janitors' talk pages...  ħ uman  15:11, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh yes. Thanks. 15:16, 24 July 2008 (EDT)

Your proposed system
I applied exactly such a system to your blog a long time ago. You lose 5 points for every hour that you don't update. I should advise you that you're currently at -10015.5 point. (Don't ask where the half point came from.) -- 14:46, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I know, I know, I know, I know...
 * Ironically, I entertained a brief daydream about having daily updates a little while ago. I'll write something soon enough, though. Stop pestering me :P 14:50, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * But pestering is what I do best. :-( More or less. -- 14:51, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You're certainly commited to it.
 * When are you going to update your blog? 14:55, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I updated a couple of days ago. [[Image:Nods.gif]] -- 15:15, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You should tell me when something like that happens.
 * You've got a typo in there, mister... ("Quiter") 15:21, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Ah, thanks. -- 16:24, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * You've got a typo in there, mister... ("Quiter") 15:21, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Ah, thanks. -- 16:24, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

Not fighting with a silly person
19:09, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes I am, actually :)
 * But seriously, there's no justification to keeping his page like that. One edit to tease him is fine, but further reversions to it is just CP-style abuse. 19:13, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I would care a whole lot more if he took the time to get an account. 19:25, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

Thing
(Thing = Bohdan not you) That's the first communication between us in almost a year! (Sorry for being stroppy, I'm not at my best) 21:39, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I must have missed something, then. There's nothing wrong with Bohdan is there? 21:48, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Before (l o n g before) your time. & I don't want my prejudices to affect you so : no, nothing wrong with him.  21:56, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Don't be silly! Your prejudices don't affect me! It's just all those damn religious people with their...
 * Wait a minute...
 * Anyway, tell me all. Go on! *makes popcorn* 22:01, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I can't even remember myself. I thought avoiding each other worked well. Bohdan2 22:02, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Here hear Bohdan, let's keep it that way, shall we? I'll go & delete my comment on your talk page (It'll still be in the diffs Je||y) & you can delete your reply. OK? 22:07, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * That sounds quite reasonable. Bohdan2 22:08, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Awww...
 * It's like RW is doing a "Christmas episode". In a second, Karajou will come in with roast chestnuts and a bashful expression. 22:10, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * More likely, he'll bash in your head. And what the hell are you troublemakers "whitewashing", eh? Achos, Bohdan used to be our "resident vandal", way back when we thought "pwning" each other was teh funny.  And I was his unpaid solicitor. I think I still have an "obsolete" userbox on the topic... Ah, those were the days...  ħ uman  22:28, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Not troublemakers (well I'm not - can't speak for B****n), rather pouring oil on troubled roads waters. 22:33, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * And God bless us every one(I have no idea how to punctuate this stupid thing) 22:38, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Couldn't you at least sign it "Tiny Tim"?  ħ uman  05:28, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Godwin's law
I think that the two edits you undoed were quite reasonable, taken together. 17:38, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Really? To me they look like typical CP-style smears. Any "facts" in the form of "many liberals [insert action here]" are meaningless, as information. TMT's version expresses the truth perfectly, and without any juvenile editorializing. 17:45, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * * sulk* -- 17:47, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Yours was fine, AK. It was just an attempt at balancing something that was almost irretrievably corrupt to begin with. No offence meant.
 * Also, "sulk" is my thing... 17:50, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * No. *sulk* is mine now. If you do not accede to my demands immediately, you won't get it back. -- 18:02, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * What demands? 18:04, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Um...




 * I'll have to get back to you about that. But demands will be forthcoming. -- 18:06, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I believe I have won this round. Good day. 18:09, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Fine, but.
Why do you seem so opposed to the idea that CMF is Jinx? -- 18:29, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm not opposed to the possibility, Shrink :) I just think it's a bit silly to assume these suspicions are correct -- especially in WIGO, our "public face". Don't you agree? 18:32, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Fair enough. And if you were Jinx I would be forced to track you down. He is just really getting to the point of pissing me off. -- 18:35, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Except that even if CMF isn't Jinx, he has defended CMF's position, which is what Fox is alleging really. However I can't complain that you are taking care of any potential libel, regardless of how small.  Sorry if I put something I should not have.--Damo2353 18:41, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * No, it's alright really, Damo. I really hate having to revert stuff from WIGO :) The "defending CWF" thing is interesting. Maybe you could put the link back in with that context? 18:45, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh yes, CMF and Jinx have the exact same mindset, and therefore I suspect he is. He's too interested. I've done searches on him all over the net, PRAYING that he is very very deep cover liberal. I am losing faith every second. -- 18:46, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I had that idea a while back, Shrink. But RA set me straight, unfortunately. 18:52, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I agree with you, STS. God Almighty, I agree with you... 18:38, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Why Schlindlers? I think fox is right. -- 18:57, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I think Fox is getting a bit carried away, y'know. 19:03, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * He does have a tendency to do that. -- 19:05, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Indeed :nods sadly: 19:07, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Any chance this will be enough to make an article about on RW, just based on this entire war thing? -- 19:11, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

I have collapsed your waveforms.
--λινυσ (☮) 21:33, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Err
There's an (unwritten) rule:
 * "ALL ALTERATIONS TO THE MAIN PAGE SHOULD BE DONE IN A SANDBOX & APPROVED BY THE MOB BEFORE BEING PUT INTO EFFECT"
 * Just sayin' is all. 04:52, 27 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Cripes! I am undone!
 * You could have mentioned that earlier :P 04:54, 27 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I wozzn't heer. 04:55, 27 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Any time before this exact moment would have been fine.
 * Also, you've made me forget what I was doing. A pox on thee. 04:56, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Main Page
Now you can copy main to a sub page, play with it & ask for opinions. If you noticed that's what Human & TMT did. 11:48, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

Don't Be Fucking Silly
That's MY thing to do - stomping off in a sulk when someone's had a go at me. 12:15, 27 July 2008 (EDT)
 * As a crat, I refuse to desysop. 12:16, 27 July 2008 (EDT)
 * me too - and I've unblocked you - wazzock! 12:18, 27 July 2008 (EDT)

RWW 3.0
RationalWikiWiki 3.0 is now up. I would appreciate your patronage.

Don't make me beg.

Oh pleeeeeeaaase validate our existence (and the $35 I spent buying the domain name) and visit! 23:37, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
 * Wow, you got rooked ;) Although, not as badly as when Network Solutions had their crummy monopoly.  Gawd, they sucked.  ħ uman  00:02, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I still iz waiting for someone to write RWW about moi. 07:10, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

DM pre-Industrial Era
No way dude, no way! A Broken Frame has some cracking choons on it - Nothing to Fear, The Sun and The Rainfall, Satellite, My Secret Garden, ot name a few - although I *will* admit that things rapidly improved from SGR onwards :D 14:14, 3 August 2008 (EDT)

NO FAIR!!
YOU HAZ FASCIST INSTINCTZ!!!! Vandal 23:16, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, that's right. 23:19, 3 August 2008 (EDT)

Jellyfish in the news
Apparently the growth in the numbers of Jellyfish is a sign that all is not well. Silver Sloth 10:26, 4 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Maybe from your point of view... :P 10:28, 4 August 2008 (EDT)

Thankz
And how ironic: order from Chaos. --JayJay4ever ??? 09:58, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Scuse me, it isn't working. --<font color="#4169E1" face="courier">JayJay4ever <font color="#FFA812">??? 10:00, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
 * I think it's ok now. --<font color="#4169E1" face="courier">JayJay4ever <font color="#FFA812">??? 11:17, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
 * I thought what I did was fairly straightforward, but it seemed to make everything much much worse, somehow :S Thanks for fixing it, anyway... 13:07, 6 August 2008 (EDT)