User talk:Progers2

The Greenhouse Effect was concluded to be very real because the atmosphere is about 33 degrees warmer than it should be otherwise according to Science. This is what the current theories of Global warming are dependent upon. There is a problem though; a serious one: with this theory and it is because of a certain fact about gas, and the Atmosphere is nearly all gas. When gas is compressed its temperature increases. You know this from using your bike pump, because after a bit the end gets too hot to hold. According to the robust science of Fluid Dynamics; which will tell you all about your bike pump and all about Star creation at the other end: the pressure at the Earth's surface; around 1 ton per square foot: leads to an enhancement of temperature of 33 degrees due to compression. If you check any and all materials from Climate Scientists you will find no reference to Fluid Dynamics, they appear to be meteorologists, not atmospheric physicists. In fact it is stated in several places that I have seen in IPCC materials, that the heat energy from the earth is transferred to the atmosphere at the same temperature that it leaves it, then the greenhouse does its stuff. The trouble with this is that the heat-energy conducting from Earth to Atmosphere is entering a compressed medium; only gases really compress, not solids or liquids except liquids marginally: and that means the heat-energy occupies a smaller volume than would otherwise be the case thus concentrating it and enhancing the temperature - by 33 degrees according to the formula of The Ideal Gas Law. This means that there is no Greenhouse Effect and that therefore mankind is not responsible for global warming, at least not due to CO2.
 * Can you clarify which sort of degrees - Celsius, Fahrenheit, Kelvin, circle... Anna Livia (talk) 12:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * They won't answer, their little screed here isn't meant to foster discussion but instead to flog their pet hobbyhorse. 12:54, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Will add 'all the other possibilities here for good measure - to show that their argument is wrong from the first statement.
 * Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Hobbyhorses anyone? Anna Livia (talk) 16:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)