RationalWiki:What is going on at ASK?/December 2009

December 2009
PJR just does not get the difference between discrete and continuous. PJR seems to think that there is some sort of difference between the current states of "evolutionary thinking" and "scientific knowledge." The only appropriate response to this is, "Are you high?" Philip, apparently butthurt about the whole Kitzmiller v. Dover thing, decides to turn the article into an editorial. Can we stop pretending that you're running an encyclopedia now? Sancho WILL NOT BE IGNORED! Bonus jerk points for sticking his big fat nose in derailing a conversation he was asked to stay out of, and largely has to do with the motivations and actions of someone else, then accusing Horace of trolling.  PJR's mini-me Bradley supports PJR by accusing Horace of feigning ignorance in the same sentence as he denies the phrase "hand waving" is nothing more than a cheap trick on Philip's part, despite Philip having just used the term in exactly that way. Apparently "context" is only for non-creationists. PJR is apparently unfamiliar with The Matrix. PJR lambasts Dr. Dino for not subjecting himself to the Wise Counsel of CMI other creationists. His disrespect for the law is not mentioned; neither is Romans 13:1. PJR: "That evolutionists believe in evolution because of the evidence is impossible given that the evidence is not on their side." Fairness is less important than Biblicalness. Hmmm, what would Jesus do about that? So why do Creationists keep asking for transitional forms if it's impossible to produce one? Isn't that a bit dishonest? Bible critics are criticizing a wiki-template. Hence, the criticism of the template is wrong.