Thomas Sowell



If you believe in equal rights, then what do ‘women's rights,’ ‘gay rights,’ etc., mean? Either they are redundant or they are violations of the principle of equal rights for all. Thomas Sowell is an American libertarian economist and advocate of supply-side economics. A senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, Sowell studied under Chicago school economist Milton Friedman. Sowell is also well known for his commentaries and analysis on politics, education, culture, and other topics in the humanities. His sharp, no-punches-pulled rhetoric has gained him a cult-like following in conservative and libertarian circles. Expect to see YouTube videos of his interviews and commentary posted in comments sections.

Personal background, education, and career
Born into a poverty-stricken black family during the Great Depression, Sowell became sympathetic to Marxism as a young adult. In a 1999 interview with Salon.com, Sowell said: "Through the decade of my 20s, I was a Marxist." After serving in the U.S. Marines during the Korean War, he became a civil servant for the U.S. federal government while attending night classes at Howard University, a historically black university in Washington, D.C. With good recommendations from professors, Sowell transferred to Harvard University and completed a bachelor's in economics there.

After graduating from Harvard, Sowell was a labor economist at the U.S. Department of Labor from 1961 to 1962. Sowell says that his economic position began to move towards laissez-faire around 1960, after he studied minimum wage laws in Puerto Rico as an intern for the federal government: "It was painfully clear that as they pushed up minimum wage levels, which they did at that time industry by industry, the employment levels were falling."

He later completed his master's in the same subject at Columbia University and his doctorate at the University of Chicago. At Chicago, Sowell studied under George Stigler and Milton Friedman, who are known for being in the Chicago school of economics. Sowell's doctoral thesis is titled Say's law and the general glut controversy.

Sowell taught economics at various colleges and universities in the '60s and '70s, including Howard, Cornell, Brandeis, UCLA, and Amherst. He has described his experiences in academia as having clashes with administration over grading policies and affirmative action. In 1980, Sowell stopped teaching economics to become a fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, having previously served in this position in 1977. He was also an executive at the Urban Institute from 1972 to 1974, and a fellow at Stanford's Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences from 1976 to 1977.

In 2002, the National Endowment for the Humanities awarded Sowell with the National Humanities Medal.

Criticism of Black Culture in America
Sowell has often blamed the black subculture in America (e.g., "gangster rap") for the disadvantages that black Americans currently face. He has asserted that black Americans are marked by "laziness, promiscuity, violence, bad English", and that this comes primarily from imitating rednecks. Sowell claims that these cultural problems and the emergence of the 'welfare state' explain modern black disadvantages better than appeals to historical injustices like slavery, segregation, and so on. His reasoning is thus wise: several markers of socio-economic wellbeing trended upwards for blacks during the century immediately following emancipation, and began a downward trend only after the introduction of welfare reforms and other "civil rights" legislation in the 1960s.

Sowell has also regularly condemned the efforts of the US government to support the so-called "black rednecks" through, for example, the provision of food and education, since he regards this as having increased their dependency on government, whilst eliminating any incentive for black people in America to improve themselves and their culture. Sowell has also criticised affirmative action policies toward black people in America along similar lines, though also arguing that they have failed to deliver the results anticipated by advocates.

Hitler-Obama Comparison
Sowell has compared Barack Obama to Adolf Hitler, saying that the similarities were obvious when Barack Obama created a relief fund for the BP oil spill. He claimed that this was symptomatic of socialism, since it involved the extraction of "vast sums of money from a private enterprise." Another comparison he made between the two is that they were both supported by the sheeple, another sign the United States was slipping towards totalitarianism.

In another article, Sowell labels Obama a fascist. An example he gives of Obama's allegedly fascistic economics is that under Obama a law passed that would "arbitrarily force insurance companies to cover the children of their customers until the children are 26 years old".

Iraq war
Despite his libertarian leanings, Sowell supported the War in Iraq along with the notion of preemptive strikes. Despite covering military interventionism favourably in his book Intellectuals and Society, Sowell neglected to address the 2003 Iraq War.

Sowell also believes that Obama and Congress' supposed weakness in dealing with Iran could inspire Iran to develop nuclear weapons. More controversially, Sowell has expressed the belief that Iran could launch nuclear attacks against America in the future, which would likely result in the US surrendering to Iran.

Global warming
Sowell is also a global warming denier, believing it to be a manufactured controversy set up in part by academics who want research grants. Some anti-environmentalist snarl words show up in his writings as well, such as "green crusaders." Another anti-environmentalist trope shows up in his writing when he expresses the nutty belief that Rachel Carson's criticisms of DDT led to bans on DDT that killed millions because it couldn't be used to fight malaria, even though there were exceptions to the "bans" explicitly for fighting malaria. Despite this he claims that "there has not been a mass murderer executed in the past half-century who has been responsible for as many deaths of human beings as the sainted Rachel Carson."

Pseudohistory
For years now Sowell has been a leading activist in "New Deal denialism," believing it worsened the economy and that the stock market crash didn't cause as high unemployment as government intervention in the economy. Sowell is also critical of the Federal Reserve, minimum wage and the Great Society, accusing the latter of being a conspiracy to encourage welfare dependency amongst blacks. He has danced around the idea of reinstituting the gold standard, not opposing it (so as to not upset libertarians) but not outright supporting it either (as to not be discredited by sane economists), though just the fact that he treats it like a credible idea makes it difficult to take him seriously as an economist.

Utter insanity
And as if all that isn't enough he's published some borderline insane articles about how "half-educated teachers" engage in "soul raping" children into becoming "true believers" (though he was invoking the specific words of Eric Hoffer with the last two quotes, though in a twisted way that served his hard-right beliefs).

Segregation
Sowell has written a column appearing to support segregation in public schools, saying black kids do better in their own schools. He gave an example of one black high school in Washington, D.C., that was forced by the government to integrate after the Brown v. Board decision. He said in the article that contrary to Chief Justice Earl Warren's assertion in the U.S. Supreme Court's Brown v. Board decision, "Dunbar High School was a living refutation of that assumption" that racially segregated schools were inherently unequal. This reeks of cherrypicking and correlation does not equal causation, despite Sowell's alleged commitment to empiricism. Sowell disregards evidence from the pre-Brown v. Board era of separate being decidedly not equal, for instance, a Washington, D.C., junior high school for black students, whose facilities were in such poor condition that a lawsuit against the Washington school district was filed on one student's behalf. Furthermore, during the Jim Crow era, Florida had a law that actually said: "school textbooks used by one race were to be stored separately from those used by the other race."

The reasonable
Sowell has done some important critiques of Marxist economics and trickle-down economics, the latter of which he considers a poor representation of supply-side. Some of the more legitimate critiques he made of Keynesianism (along with Friedman and Friedrich Hayek) helped Keynesian economists adjust their policies in a more efficient way. He also supports the decriminalization of drugs.

Sowell is also strongly critical of racialism. Of course, he goes on to say that it was only the left that was pushing the notion of genetic superiority (in the Progressive Era, specifically). This is essentially ignoring most of American history, as well as blatant instances of right-wing uses of scientific racism, such as by the nativist movement, the Nazis, and the segregationists.

Sowell has also criticized the anti-vaccination movement: "In a categorical sense, nothing on the face of the earth is 100 percent safe — including going unvaccinated. But the claim that vaccines cause autism has been discredited by evidence." In the same article, Sowell alleged that the definition of autism was manipulated because of "financial incentives" for children to receive government-subsidized treatment, citing the work of Vanderbilt professor Stephen Camarata, author of the book Late-Talking Children.

In 2008, Sowell wrote a column titled "An Internet fraud", in response to a chain email mis-attributing to him an essay that accused Barack Obama of not being a U.S. citizen. "Making something up is a confession of both intellectual and moral bankruptcy," Sowell concluded. That chain email is merely part of a longtime phenomenon that advances conservative ideology through spreading hoax information via chain emails, a topic Sowell could have easily tackled in his column further in depth.

Having played baseball in his youth, Sowell sometimes writes about the sport in his columns and even uses baseball analogies when discussing political or economic topics.

Opposition to Donald Trump (February-November 2016)
In the 2016 presidential election, Sowell opposed the Republican candidacy of Donald Trump. Sowell wrote, for a special issue of National Review on February 15, 2016: "...after seven years of repeated disasters, both domestically and internationally, under a glib egomaniac in the White House, so many potential voters are turning to another glib egomaniac to be his successor." Sowell also snuck in a comparison to Hitler. Two months later, Sowell said that Trump's "constantly spouting off with irresponsible rhetoric" would reduce international confidence in the U.S. presidency in dealing with terrorist threats. Later that month, Sowell wrote: "A smorgasbord of political positions — none of them indicating any serious thought about complicated issues — is not a principle. Nor is cheering for himself and boasting about all the great things he is going to do as President."

"Partly this was due to the media's obsession with Donald Trump. But the public shares responsibility for the triumph of glitter over substance, because polls repeatedly showed that the public was far more attracted to the glitter," said Sowell in explaining the popularity of Trump. Sowell also blamed the "Republican establishment, whose serial betrayals of their supporters created the setting for a Donald Trump to arise."

Defense of Donald Trump (October 2016–present)
Two weeks before the 2016 election, Sowell said that Trump was the lesser of two bad choices: "Neither the media nor Congressional Republicans would automatically spring to his defense if he overstepped the line. His impeachability may be his most important asset in a year of painful choices." (That statement aged poorly in 2019.) In contrast, Sowell said that Hillary Clinton would not be as impeachable because "any criticism of her, much less any impeachment, would bring loud howls from the media across the country that ugly sexist bias was behind any opposition to anything she did — no matter how awful" (without regard to what happened to the other Clinton or the fact that The New York Times published numerous stories raising FUD about Hillary Clinton in the years leading up to the election). In a column published on election day, Sowell wrote: "...neither Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump has the qualifications, the track record or the personal character to be President of the United States." Sowell also called Trump "a 70-year-old adolescent" and criticized Trump's position on eminent domain: "Donald Trump seems to think that it is OK for the government to seize someone else's home and turn the property over to him, so that he can build something — without having to pay what it would cost him to buy the home." Yet he went on to defend Trump as having "no...ideological agenda" regarding Supreme Court nominees and predicting (again, only half right) that Trump "can be impeached if he oversteps the bounds, without either the Republicans or the media screaming loud protests."

In 2018, when asked on his thoughts of Trump's presidency, Sowell replied "I think he's better than the previous president." In March 2019, Sowell commented on the public's response to mainstream media's allegations that Trump was a "racist": "What's tragic is that there's so many people out there who simply respond to words rather than ask themselves "Is what this person says true? How can I check it?" And so on." One month later, Sowell again defended Trump against media charges of "racism"."I've seen no hard evidence,” Sowell said of the racism complaint lobbed at Trump. “And, unfortunately, we’re living in a time where no one expects hard evidence. You just repeat some familiar words and people will react pretty much the way Pavlov’s dog was conditioned to react to certain sounds." Sowell believed that if the Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden won the 2020 U.S. presidential election, it could signal a point of no return for the country. He believes it could lead to a tipping point for the country like the fall of the Roman Empire. In an interview in July 2020, he stated that: "the Roman Empire overcame many problems in its long history but eventually it reached a point where it could no longer continue on, and much of that was from within, not just the barbarians attacking from outside.” Sowell believed that if Biden won, the Democratic Party would have a huge amount of control over the country and if this happened, they could twin with the radical left and ideas such as defunding the police could come to fruition which would be very negative for the country.