Forum:The Prescribed Evolutionary Hypothesis

I am curious as to how this forum regards my alternative to the Darwinian hoax. John A. Davison


 * Never heard of it. But judging by the way you've come to this community only to say "LOOK AT ME!! LOOK AT MEEE!!1!!1one!!!11" I'm really not interested. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 15:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


 * As the ramblings of an old man who appears to have had some sort of major neurological failure after a mediocre career as a professor? tmtoulouse 15:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm getting quite high up the scientific ladder now and they still haven't told be about keeping quiet on the faked global warming data and that evolution is a hoax. I'm getting really annoyed now, this must go quite deep. 17:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I looked up the prescribed evolutionary hypothesis. So far, I've got as far as the introduction, haven't bothered reading any further. You say that 'the products of the most intensive selection have not exceeded the species barrier'. That is wrong. --Seantalk 05:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I tried to look at the pdf linked from your blog. All I got was an error message in French.  00:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, found it at Uncommon Stupidity of all places. You're a loony.  00:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)