Conservapedia talk:Bias in Conservapedia (May 2007)

Homophobia
Please note, I have included a direct external cite to This is a large concession, because although ADL's definition of homophobia probably is outdated as the CP article has documented, this covers the reservations many editors had on that page. This is a major concession, and a recognition of the ADL as a reputable and valid source. RobS 17:50, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
 * Homophobia Online: The Westboro Baptist Church, Anti-Defamation League (2001). Retrieved 05/23/07.


 * I suspect Andrew doesn't see his own bias for the same reason fish don't see water. :( --Gulik 23:04, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
 * You mean that he swims in his own pee? human  15:08, 25 November 2007 (EST)

Wicca
Conservapedia's article on Wicca fails to mention the centuries of persecution they endured at the hands of Christians. Not a word. With some irony, I quote: "Not to be sarcastic but I found this article strangely devoid of bias. I find that nice.--Snotbowst 18:01, 28 February 2008 (EST)" If Wikipedia leaving stuff out is bias, Conservapedia leaving stuff out almost certainly is.

Ngo Dinh Diem
Conservapedia's page on Ngo Dinh Diem is propaganda! There left out anything to do with his prosecution of Buddhist. Conservapedia's page said he was a Dinh Diem was a devout Catholic throughout his life. leaving out his respect toward Hitler. Ghy213 (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)