RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Polymeric falcighol derivation

Polymeric falcighol derivation | Result: eh

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete

 * 1) Already covered on the deep web page. This page as it is now is hardly missional; it just has quotes ffs.  06:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * A reminder that this still exists. 18:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) - 05:30, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Does the job perfectly Deku-shrub (talk) 12:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * So what? If you are worried about Google rank alone, then you should have put this in the redirect section. Perhaps instead of strawmanning, you discuss the actual points I made about the page being poor in quality. 01:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * We have an article on this fallacy, argumentum ad Google ranking! 02:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Goat
Would we lose the Google search ranking for that term if we just kept it as a redirect? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 18:59, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Did we ever care about google page rankings? 85.234.65.51 (talk) (Sophie) 12:43, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Do we really want people who google this shit to get pointed to another page which lends credence to this myth? Zionist Goy (talk) 01:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)