User talk:Smolenskiii

Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 06:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Esther Hicks
I'm not sure what those two edits to the Esther Hicks article were about. If you have questions, they should be asked on the talk page rather than on the article. You shouldn't write in the first person on articles either. Can you look at rephrasing your additions, please? –SuspectedReplicant retire me 06:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

I’m obviously new to this site, I was simply making an addition to the article, is this not what the site encourages? I have removed the article and await your response as to where I should place any further writing in relation to same, 08:03, 3 April 2011

Regarding recent post to existing Esther Abraham Hicks writing. Is it not appropriate to avail of the existing edit example on all articles to make additional comments? This makes perfect sagacity? You quark that you don’t understand the post, possibly you don’t 08:13, 3 April 2011


 * Of course the site encourages people to make additions, but please can you read the links you were given and find out what edits are appropriate. There's a standard to maintain. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 08:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Certainly I will, and follow the criterion I must, was this Esther Abraham Hicks article yours? 08:28, 3 April 2011


 * No, it's nothing to do with me. I was just checking out the latest additions to the site, as I sometimes do. –SuspectedReplicant retire me 08:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Please be very conservative when editing any talk page here. In Talk:Esther Hicks the reorganising you did caused some comments to vanish. We generally don't edit talk pages except when there's a need to archive.   Concernedresident  omg!!! ponies!!! 10:01, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

sorry about that it was an accident ..smolenskiii 10:12, 3 April 2011