User talk:Keegscee

Please don't trash articles with accuasational satire similar to what we'd say about CONservapedis. 03:28, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

relativity rollback
Keegscee, excuse the rollback, but the relativity link should remain pointed at Wikipedia. You could add a CP link addition to the WP one, but we need to keep a bit of reality there. -- 03:35, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Sysop stuff
I left a reply on my talk page. I don't have the power to demote you to sysop, but if you keep editing, and prove yourself harmless, some kind person will normally do the honours.-- 12:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

DEmotion
Congratulations, you've been demoted to the rank of janitor here. Here's your broom and dustpan. 02:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome. That was easy. Thanks Keegscee (talk) 02:28, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Well we do have incredibly low stadnards for people to become sysops. 02:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey you!
Yeah, you. Come join our community in the saloon bar if you want to get to know the community better. Hope to see you there. Cheers. 02:41, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I know it was only 3 seconds, but revenge blocks on TK here only serve his ultimate purpose (to end civilization as we know it). 04:49, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Point taken. He just makes me so mad!!! Keegscee (talk) 04:59, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

new
--  = w =  06:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Cp and WP
"maybe this is a vandal reforming site" - nice point.

As far as mucking up your rep on WP to fight anti-CP battles (is that what you were doing?) it's not worth the loss of cred, IMHO. Not to say I haven't slipped over the line once or twice ;). But personally I try to keep my WP presence independent of the RW/CP issues.  Different sites, different rules, different personae, to an extent.  02:43, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I may share a username with my WP persona, but I know these are two different sites.   02:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I usually go out of my way to keep things neutral in regards to CP. What I got blocked for is putting this on my userpage. Granted not the smartest thing, but I was on a Dexter kick and I figured there was nothing they could do without any proof. I was acting on the 'ignore all rules' principle, which basically says you can ignore any of the Wikipedia rules as long as you are doing it for the good of the project (which I was). Oh well. Keegscee (talk) 03:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you link us to the discussion etc. of your being blocked there? Just curious, no big deal.  03:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * AN/I discussion. Sockpuppet investigation. I'm not sure why I'm under a sockpuppet investigation. I've never once socked at WP so a checkuser will find that out in time. I have 2600+ edits at WP and all are good faith edits. I just can't believe that stupid little statement would warrant an indefinite block. Keegscee (talk) 03:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The guy who started the investigation has been out to get me ever since I asked him about abuse reports back in November. He is an editor on CP. For the sake of not outing anyone I won't tell you which editor, but it wouldn't be very hard to figure out. Keegscee (talk) 03:55, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * What on earth did you do to piss off the teenagers who run wikipedia? I went to those links and all I saw was garbage verbiage. Not saying I think you're right, but seriously? 2600 edits? Oh well, the tweens didn't like you. 03:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I figured I'll just unplug my modem tonight, get a new IP, start a new good faith account, and continue helping with WP. Keegscee (talk) 04:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Images
The trick to uploading images is to steal not only the image but the summary stuff off Wikipedia, or Commons were it is all stored these days.

On a side not, are they running one of those bullshit college spread offenses? 06:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Not when this picture was taken. But they are now and it is not working out so well. But alas, you have to stay true to your roots. Thanks for the advice. Keegscee (talk) 06:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Um.
(sees picture on userpage) You're hot. rational ghey (send a message) 01:51, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I think this might be a RW first. 03:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Now I'm blushing....Keegscee (talk) 17:50, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * =) rational ghey (send a message) 20:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm sure you have but did you see this? rational homohey 22:59, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Of course. Let's not talk about it, though. Keegscee (talk) 23:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * sorry. I think it's ridiculous.. someone who should be banned is grawp, and I think that jackass is just pushing a political jehad against you. rational homohey 00:29, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The original block against me was indeed ridiculous, but my behavior since then has probably been worthy of a ban. I was just so frustrated at the block and even more frustrated at the inability of any admin to grow a pair and overturn it. Plus, it's just so funny and entertaining to rile up DMorris that I just can't help myself. Keegscee (talk) 00:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I am also very hot. Acei9 00:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sure you're hotter than I am. There is a reason I posted a picture where most of my body is covered up with paint...Keegscee (talk) 00:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Forgive me for being blatantly homosexual and not knowing what colors those are (I think Mich)... so do you go to U mich? I know they hate OSU :P rational homohey 02:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You are correct. I did go to Michigan but I graduated in 2008. Now I'm just an overworked, underpaid engineer in dire need of a career change. Keegscee (talk) 03:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Long time, no see. You doing okay? 02:46, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * By the way, the Michigan football team is looking good this year. People at my school are mighty afraid of it. 03:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome back!
To the internet. Where have you been? DMorris2 (talk) 02:42, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Surprise, motherfucker!
Hello you creep! -Doakes