User talk:Nutty Roux/Archive1

Dear Nutty
Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 04:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Afrika Bambaataa is a genius. Thanks for the wayback machine.  04:44, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Pfffft that aint way - this is way back....

Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 04:48, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ooh, back when they were Rolf und Florian. Good pick. 04:52, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Gawd, I think I own that record... 05:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I like a bit of this upon occassion also

Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 05:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Liquid McWicked
Have you seen Shogun Assassin? Its the movie that all the dialogue (.."choose the ball and join your mother in death"..etc etc) from Liquid Swords is taken. Ace McWickedi9 02:34, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Choose the sword, and you'll join me.
Ace McWickedi9 02:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I just called the hipster video place and they have it. I'll get it tomorrow and report shortly thereafter. Your mother would be proud. 02:54, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Its a damn fucking good film. I am super hungover but drinking again. While my woman lays on the couch stuffing herself with pizza I am watching this....

Get it if you havent seen it. Its called Ninja Scroll. Ace McWickedi9 02:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Son of a whore. "This video is not available in your country due to copyright restrictions." 02:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I went to the fancy liquor store and bought a case of my favorite cheap bordeaux. How many bottles of wine are you supposed to drink before you go out? 03:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

I usually have about 1 or 2 before leaving the house.

How about this? Ace McWickedi9 03:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sokay. It's anime.  03:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * (EC)I got SO FUCKING SICK of fucking Ninja Scroll. When Teletoon first came on the air here, they bought about five anime movies that they'd play, in order OVER AND OVER AGAIN.  They must have played Ninja Scroll at least 30 times, no lie.  And honestly, most of the character designs aren't even all that appealing, especially male faces.  I didn't mind so much that they'd play Macross Plus ad nauseum, though.  At least that was good. --Kels 03:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I dont like much anime but there are some classics. Like Akira. Everyone has seen Akira right? Ace McWickedi9 03:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * And Miyazaki. Personally, I celebrate the man's entire catalog. 03:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The man speaks truth. If Miyazaki did anything bad, I'm not aware of it.  But a lot of the great stuff out there is in features or direct to video stuff, not in the series work that you hear the fangirls go on about.  Most of it doesn't nearly live up to the comics they're based on. --Kels 03:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Miyazaki's stuff is a little light hearted for me. Not bad, just too soft for my liking. Ace McWickedi9

03:26, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I was making a bad Office Space joke. I hate anime you big eyed fuckers. &mdash; Unsigned, by: Nutty Roux / talk / contribs
 * You, uh, do know the "big eyes" meme comes from Disney, right? Say Ace, what sort of thing you into?  Action, psychological, horror, or what? --Kels 03:38, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Violent hate sex. 03:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Urotsokidoji, then? --Kels 03:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Lemonpeel
In response to your shout-out, I was Lemonpeel. Funny after all that arguing with Andy on the physics pages, I think it was my objection to some quote about eugenics that got me banned by some completely different person.--Mathoreilly 03:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Baguette!
You seem to be back for good. I'm so happy I've farted here. 17:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

What the fuck?
No booze for two fucking days, what the fuck man? Jesus, how do you get out of bed? How can you stand to look at yourself in the mirror? Ace McWickedi9 20:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Been so busy with finishing a project I gotta stay straight. Plus I'm getting fat. I hate it. 20:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

No subject
You go really really well in gravy... -- 03:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I am the basis of many a good sauce, kind Shrink. 03:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not a fan of your brickish cousin though...
 * Do you mean that disgusting Greek slab that gets called a "sauce"? 03:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Skype
We should skype one of these days. I cant really express myself when in the office as I have had complaints leveled against me concerning my foul langauge and the guy behind me is a young earth creationist, funnily enough. Ace McWickedi9 03:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Bet. I will send you a very important email. 03:53, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well I wont have got it, I am at home now. Send to my home address yeah? Ace McWickedi9 04:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Lovage
This one is waaaay better -

I am dowloading Moment of Truth from Gangstarr. Love the album. Ace McWickedi9 01:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

You might like Dan the Automator. Check out Handsome Boy Modeling School. PS that's RZA.
 * RZA kicks ass, nice beats. 07:07, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

You might also agree with me that Dr. Octagon, also produced by Dan the Automator, is the kind of absolutely fucking genius lunatic comic book kung fu nerd geek you'd hang out with. That's Qbert on the tables, Dan on the deck, and Kool Keith on the mic. 07:00, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Handsome Boy is one of my old favourites. Ace McWickedi9 07:27, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * We continue to agree on a great many things, sir. Did you know I took a giant crackling shit this morning, all 15 inches of it curling round the bowl, and thought of taking a picture of it to upload to ratemypoo.com with the caption "My TK" ?

Sig
Did you bork it? The talk page link is on a new line on your last two comments at WIGO CP. 00:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Should be ok now. Thanks for pointing that shizzle out, you the rizzle dizzle. 00:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No prizzle, chizzle. 02:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You are leaving twin copies of your sig all over the site. 02:45, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Where is that extra carriage return coming from, Pi? I'm stumped. 02:52, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * In between the choice tags. 02:57, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * New sig: cool. 20:46, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yup, new sig is cool. Ace McWickedi9 20:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Motion passed: Nutty's sig is brill. 12:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

MarcusCicero
Should be made a sysop of people are going to block him during discussions, dontcha think? 21:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, MC is a troublesome bitch who is still clearly unaware of what we are trying to do here. I wouldn't support his sysopship. Ace McWickedi9 22:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No. I only blocked him for 5 minutes so we could the impending revert war. He wasn't frozen out of any discussion. 22:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but first you blocked him for 9 hours. If he tried to edit and saw that, how would he know you shortened the block 5 minutes later?  I'm not being "pro MC" here, I'm trying to help us avoid the Trial of the Century.  22:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You're thinking about sysoping a guy who vandalizes the wiki so he can more freely call us names and berate us when we revert his edits, all to avoid his charge that we (read me) were treating him unfairly? I wouldn't, but you're the bureaucrat, not me. Isn't he supposed to be vandal binned anyway? 22:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * How about you stop being a dick and treating him so unfairly? &mdash; Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 22:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Please tell me you're kidding. It's hard to tell sometimes. 22:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I dunno, is he vandal binned? If forget how to check...  22:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I thought the html comment would tip you off... &mdash; Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 22:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * MC does dish it out quite continuously and hasn't really ever shown himself to be community spirited so....I am just saying. Ace McWickedi9 22:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * @NU I don't always read diffs. But I'm relieved. I was about to set the wiki on fire and split to Mexico. @Human, he's apparently not vandal binned when he's logged in, only his IP (IIRC)  22:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

He's not in the VB 22:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Right, but since we don't have checkuser I'm relying on my memory for having vandal binned an IP address he came back as to keep fighting after he was blocked. 22:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I thought I was blocked last night... Ah well. Make me a sysop. With immediate effect. MarcusCicero (talk) 17:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sorry about that MC. I should have just blocked you for 5 minutes. I would oppose you being a sysop, ignoring the fact that you're a vandal, simply because you're such a unpleasant and dickless twit. But it's not up to me. 17:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * How the fuck am I a vandal? I can understand the accusation of troll but vandalism is just preposterous.MarcusCicero (talk) 17:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Among other things, you repeatedly make the same boring Anne Coulter edit to historical revisionism and litter pages with personal insults. Surely you jest in protesting being called a vandal so vehemently. 17:52, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I am biased towards reality (something you duds genuinely think you are) but the Ann Coulter thing is indicative of the entire problem here. You don't have a fucking clue about the scholarship behind revisionism so why don't you go fuck yourself? MarcusCicero (talk) 19:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Not sure if this was an invitation to answer or not. Do you know what my scholarly qualifications are? What are yours? Would you flesh out the underlying idea here that one must have some kind of qualifications to be able to address certain topics? I'm not following you and you've so far failed to give any compelling reasoning behind your fascination with the Anne Coulter issue. Only personal insults. 19:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Cockblock!!! hahahahahaha!!! Your so funny!!!! MarcusCicero (talk) 19:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright
RationalWiki has officially transitioned to a CC-BY-SA license. You have several images that you, as the copyright holder, released specifically under the GFDL. Between now and August 1st is your window of opportunity to convert this over to CC-BY-SA. If you are so inclined go ahead and replace the template with a CC-BY-SA or contact me for assistance. Happy fishing. tmtoulouse 17:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Terrence F. Koeckritz
Not really interested in compromising photos or anything like that, but I would be interested to know what he looks like. Maybe something in the public domain. --Kels (talk) 05:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I was asked by someone harmed by TK's slander to find a good address for him in case we needed to take further action, starting with sending a polite letter asking him to remove certain defamatory statements from CP. He's done all that without me having to ask, which I think reflects that he's a bigger guy than we give him credit for in some regards. I'm not looking for any further info on him. Sorry to disappoint. 14:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Just curiosity. I was more interested in stuff that's out there in public anyhow, like maybe video of him pushing Nancy Regan down or something. --Kels (talk) 17:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Email
I sent you an important email concerning a well known english heavy metal band. Ace McWickedNecron99 04:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The touring bass player was a history professor as my university. I sent you an impotent email about a poorly known Conservapedia admin. 04:54, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I have no email? Did you send to Yahoo! or work? I am at home. Ace McWickedNecron99 05:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I just spoke to a bass player for several hours about speakers... 05:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm too drunk to send email. Sorry. Tell Human we can continue with out conspiratorial plotting tomorrow when I sober up. 05:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Hahahahaha you fucking lightweight. And nice, good to see a fellow 'crat! Ace McWickedNecron99 05:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh holy shit I had no idea you guys had this much stuff saved up! The cabal section is fantasic! Thanks Human! 05:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * please to share. Ace McWickedNecron99 05:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Only to special is to please. Don't forget to tip the server on its end. 05:40, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: German Tomatoes
What? 14:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It's an old variety of heirloom tomato that makes a sweet red flesh with small seed pockets - holds up well in salads and sandwiches because it's not 80% juice like crummy hybrid grocery store tomatoes. 17:07, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ahh... sounds lovely. Unfortunately, I'm a poor, poor man and most the food I buy is either Super Noodles or Walkers Crisps. 18:56, 30 July 2009 (UT
 * tomatoes are one those things that don't require more than some dirt, water and time. Go to the fancy grocer and buy 1 expensive tomato that you think you'll like. Save the seeds and dry them. Then learn how to start them indoors before spring so you can have hearty plants in time for warm weather. Voilà. Cheap and easy. And delicious.  19:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Do you want to party?


Hey Ace, I thought you got rid of that white hat? Rad McCool (talk) 02:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No way would I get rid of it! If I did I wouldnt know when it was time to party down. Ace McWickedModel 500 02:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)



Watch it, son. You don't want Conservapederast visiting you now, do you? 04:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Daytona 500
Ace McWickedModel 500 05:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That was great. Thanks for the memories, Ace. I gotta crash so I can wake up for my housekeeper to make me martinis, change my sheets, wash my clothes, and clean my house. I'll be back after that. Check you later. 05:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You forgot "destain my undies". 05:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

The Message
Gotta love the outfits. Ace McWickedModel 500 05:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Saw my doc yesterday....
Though I'm not feeling ill, There's a little yellow pill. I'm running for the shelter, Of Ace's little helper. And it helps me on my way, get's me through my busy day. Doctor please, some more of these I'm out the door And I'll pop four more. Ace McWickedModel 500 22:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

You're a genius
I run my computer into a 1977 Kenwood receiver and out into two Sony bookshelf speakers. It sounds great, and my downstairs neighbours really seem to love it when I play my music with the receiver turned up over 4 or 5. I can hear them banging on the ceiling in appreciation. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 15:14, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Seriously. Why didn't I think of this before instead of continuing to use some dinky Dell "computer speakers" from the late 90's? I never imagined what it would be like to sit in my office getting rumbled by a subwoofer and being able to turn the volume down on my wireless keyboard to answer the phone. More than several people being ignorant of this boon seems like too much of a coincidence. I suspect conspiracy to keep receivers and speaker sets stockpiled in thrift stores nationwide because that's where they hide the heroin.  15:19, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hehe... my PC is hooked up to roughly 18 speakers (not using surround, or there'd be a few more) ... diagram at the bottom of this page. 20:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Some years back I had 3 turntables and 2 cd mixers all running through a large Vestax mixer. All this was running through a computer which in turn ran through into some massive JBL speakers so we could manipulate the music, add effects and record mixers. Had over a 1000 old school techno records. The neighbours were not happy. But people like them never are. Ace McWickedModel 500 21:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * My neighbor below is chain smoking me out of my house. All I smell when he's home is dank stale cigarette smoke and occasionally the smell of old liquor and cigarette butts when he opens his door. He's worse than a cat lady. I now have no problem playing the Misfits at top volume when I'm at the other end of the house. I'm totally impressed with this setup. Old Onkyo stereo receiver - probably 100 Watts - going through a 15 year old Bose Acoustimass with 4 satellite speakers and the passive sub. Sounds good for an office. 22:03, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I are you sure we arent neighbours? Ace McWickedModel 500 22:20, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * If we were neighbors the whole building would smell like old liquor and cigarette butts, and your fiance would leave, and we'd end up arrested on noise violations and for intimidating the neighbors. 22:22, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you want to hear something embarrassing? 22:23, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. Yes I do. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 22:29, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * A Justin Timberlake song came up on the iTunes shuffle and I liked it. 22:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

If we were neighbours Nutty you'd move in when my fiancee left and we'd cook up many a scheme. Do you want to hear something not so embarrasing? My boss was talking to me and I was nodding and appeared to be hearing her but I was in fact listening to Adam Beyer and my nodding was actually me bopping along to his skills in mixing minimal swedish techno. Ace McWickedModel 500 22:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * RW Fall meeting is in Las Vegas. Pass it on. 23:06, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't it be more fun to go somewhere run by the Mafia/mob? 05:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Nowhere to run to baby....
...Nowhere to hiiide.....

Ace McWickedModel 500 05:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

I could use your help
here &mdash; Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 14:31, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Punk Rock
I was admiring your signature on my usertalk page and then you show up to delete Fall Down's "condoms" article... Good times. 21:01, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks brother. I aims to please. And thanks much for the shoutout in the latest Schlafly Doo episode. Human read it to me while I was driving and it cracked me up. He reads to me when I'm falling asleep too. 01:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks you very much, I loves the complimentering. I'm not ready to exchange numbers with other users though... maybe in a cupla months, if I ever had anything to talk about. So romantic, reading you to sleep. 12:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Calling the legal beagle patrol
The We the People Act popped up on RationalWiki:To_do_list, might be right up your alley... 01:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh for goodness sakes. Not even the far far right think this is a good idea. The statute proposes to limit the jurisdiction of all federal courts from adjudicating any claim involving a state or local law relating to free exercise or establishment of religion, any claim based on right of privacy (remember that this is one of those "penumbra" rights that the far right hates, stemming if IIRC from Griswold v. Conn. = the rubbers case) "including any such claim related to any issue of sexual practices, orientation, or reproduction," and any equal protection claim based on straight or gay marriage. Further, the Supreme Court and all federal courts would be prohibited from relying on any earlier federal decision on the above topics (Ron Paul wants to completely rewrite federal constitutional jurisprudence - I have no words for how appalling I find this idea).

A "violation" of the Act by a judge would be an impeachable offense, and the Act retroactively removes all cases decided on issues that would have been prohibited by the Act from the principle of stare decisis.

I've been meaning to look at whether Congress would even have the constitutional authority under any empowerment clause in the constitution, particularly in the context of limiting the Court's authority to hear certain habeus corpus cases involving detainees. I'll get to this We the People Act when I can. It's absolutely disgusting. Now I don't feel so bad about Ron Paul humiliating himself in the new Sacha Baron Cohen movie. 01:24, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You're pretty sexy when your anrgy. Ace McWickedModel 500 01:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Turns out only parts of the We the People Act are remarkable. It was a surprise to me to remember that Congress actually does have the authority to limit the jurisdiction of all courts lower than the Supreme Court and to limit all but the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (original means not appellate). What's more remarkable about this statute are the theoretical consequences of prohibiting the Supreme Court from reviewing past authority. To do s owould both admit the authority is correct and freeze it in time. I'll have to think about this a lot more. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Liberal. 01:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * English please? -- 02:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I think it boils down to, "Congress is allowed to decide what kinds of cases the federal courts can and cannot hear." 02:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a little more complicated, but you're basically right for the kinds of cases that matter. Courts in the United States, whether under state or federal law, are created and empowered by statutes or constitutions. In the federal system Article III of the United States Constitution creates the Supreme Court and specifically determines its jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is the power of a court to adjudicate a particular matter. In the context we're talking about here, we're talking about "subject matter" jurisdiction, or the power of a court to adjudicate certain kinds of matters, rather than "personal jurisdiction," which is a court's power over a particular person or entity.  The Supreme Court has what is called "original" subject matter jurisdiction over only a small category of cases, including "all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party." These cases are an insignificant part of the Court's work, both in number and significance. Original jurisdiction means these cases can be filed directly in the Supreme Court with it acting as both finder of fact and law. Without altering the Constitution, no act of Congress could diminish this "original" jurisdiction because such acts are subordinate to the Constitution. The Supreme Court also has "appellate" jurisdiction over narrowly defined categories of cases " with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make." Appellate jurisdiction is the Court's power to sit in review of decisions of lower federal courts and state supreme courts on important issues (it's purely discretionary and in fact the Court hears a smaller and smaller percentage of all appeals filed every year). This means that Congress has the power to define anything but the Court's original jurisdiction. Article III also gives Congress the authority to establish the lower courts, which are the Circuit Courts of Appeal and the District Court (trial courts). The trial courts are where all federal cases start. The We the People Act would end trial court jurisdiction over the above types of cases, as well as preclude the Supreme Court from hearing appeals on these types of cases. It's crooked, would be unlikely to pass, but parts of it are theoretically not unconstitutional.  As Congress has the power to create these courts, Congress also has the power to constrain their jurisdiction and there are several examples of this happening in American history, particularly during the Civil War.  03:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

I see that this subject is interesting to exactly 1 person. I'll get around to the article when I feel like it :) 04:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Can I copy your above explanation to the "draft" version in order to embarrass you into cleaning it up? I find stuff like this fascinating.  04:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Not yet. It's not remotely focused enough. I'll get to it brother. I'll get to it. On the other hand, shame me. 05:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Buddy ol' pal
Thanks for improving that WIGO. I didn't have time to think of a funny as I knew if TK were around it'd be oversighted so wanted to grab it quick. Ace McWickedModel 500 04:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You are a motherfucking badass, brother. I salute you for getting on that in a heartbeat. Why are you so silent today? Don't tell me that thick-ankled supervisor of yours is standing around trying to talk to you through your headphones. 04:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Na, just busy as fuck at the moment - getting ready for a week in Melbourne so heaps to do. Ace McWickedModel 500 04:53, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

They say there is no hope, they say no UFOs
Ace McWickedModel 500 05:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. 05:24, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * LISTEN TO DR. OCTAGON IT'S DOPE. So is this.

05:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I could never get into Dr. Octagon... It always made me think of what Necro and DJ Shadow would sound like if they made a record together. &mdash; Signed, by: Neveruse513 / Talk / Block 20:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Time for the conclusion....
One of my favorites.....listen...listen to it all.. Ace McWickedModel 500 08:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Not with MY ears I won't, thank you. 13:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hahahaha you have stupid ears. Ace McWickedModel 500 20:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Email
Do you have a "public" e-mail address? Could you send me an e-mail (ttoulouse@gmail.com) from an address that I could reply to? tmtoulouse 18:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Sent. Please confirm. 19:04, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Confirmed and replied and all that good stuff. Thanks! tmtoulouse 19:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

I will chop your penis off and throw it out of a moving car
Congratulations sir. That is all. 01:05, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * oh snap. now i'm quoteworthy! thnk you sir. 01:43, 15 August 2009 (UTC)