Talk:You have two cows

Duplicate Article
Hmmm...wait. Why are there two "Two Cow" articles? That's dumb. Someone should do something about that. Harrumph. DogP Marmite Patrol 12:50, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * You have two articles. Both are lame.  12:59, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough.  Someone want to put them out of their misery, despite my superb contribution to them today?   We could take the cows to the stun gun....   DogP Marmite Patrol 13:03, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I made this one as a more serious treatment of the subject, explaining it and trimming it down to the RW-relevant examples. I figure this is the most sensible approach to it. 13:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * And what about the other one?  DogP Marmite Patrol 17:58, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It's in the funspace where it belongs. 18:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * As long as we keep on top of the content creep on the main article, things should be Just Fine. 18:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * This way lies madness.  DogP Marmite Patrol 17:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Addenda
You have two cows. Ealing Libraries blocks access to one.

Yhtc - Conservapedia: this is proof God exists. They are not l#####n cows.

Yhtc - Wikipedia: Please read a personal message from Jimbo Wales/an editor of XXX articles - follow this link. This is original research. This is unsourced information. (add to taste) 82.198.250.67 (talk) 17:22, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * == Deletion ==

Shouldn't this be redirected to the other article then? Peter with added ‼Science‼ 08:01, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes.  08:07, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * No. I've removed the only mainspace links to it (both of which were completely pointless & irrelevant) and it's unlikely to be a much searched for term.  12:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Point taken.  16:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)