User talk:84.250.168.242

My mistake, sweary contribution by an IP, I just reverted assuming it was vandalism (I just googled it and assumed I was right without actually checking). Christopher (talk) 17:39, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries. TBH my contriubution is at least semi-vandalistic and purposely non-constructive. It's factually correct in an asshole kind of way. So you shouldn't really be too harsh on yourself. --84.250.168.242 (talk) 17:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I made it (hopefully) correct. Even if you did it in the wrong way it's still a good thing you pointed it out, thanks. Christopher (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Chris's edit looks good to me. Though, aren't Cape Verde, Guinea-Bissau, and Portugal all in the Eastern hemisphere? The Western hemisphere (at least in my mind and from what I've found online) refers to the Americas. Anim (Carfa) 18:06, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Is everyone here a complete dud when it comes to basic goddamn geography? This is very simple. The Prime Meridian. Follow it. Stuff on the West of it - Western Hemisphere. Sheesh. Consult a damn atlas, clowns.--84.250.168.242 (talk) 18:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * After a strenuous 0.81 seconds of rigorous research using this thing called "Google", I was able to find this for you geniuses. I know it may not be much, being Wikipedia and such, but here goes. Or, you could just find the Prime Meridian on any atlas or terrestrial globe, if such advanced technology is available to you. --84.250.168.242 (talk) 18:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * (Edit conflict) Alright but there's no need to get so angry about it. Christopher (talk) 18:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Why do you appear to get so annoyed at ignorance of basic geography/laziness? I suppose it's good to feel superior about something but you could aim higher than basic geography surely? Christopher (talk) 18:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm angry because I don't have Jesus in my life and because general sloppiness and ignorance are exceedingly frustrating to me, especially from those who would present themselves as general purveyors of information. I'm not angry, I'm just an exuberant asshole. I'm sorry if I misinterpreted several of the site's articles to be sarcastic in general tone and thought sarcasm might fly here. I agree there's no need to get angry. It's just that there seems to be this pressing need to type out ignorant and useless queries about completely non-contested basic facts instead of investing a second into finding out for oneself. Stuff like that tends to frustrate me. In all likelihood this stems from my mother's lexical sloppiness in my early childhood. I was a highly articulate baby. But please do elaborate your speculative psychological profile on my evident superiority/inferiority complex. I may have some theories of my own in that department, no original research though. It took quite a bit of effort to get this hemispheric stuff through to you guys. If that's to be the basis of my prognosis, I'm not sure I have the energy to aim much higher at this point. Not today. Not with these phonetically phlegmatic audio-captchas. I've heard more intelligible announcements at a Hungarian airport. Your edit is fine btw, if a bit dry. --84.250.168.242 (talk) 19:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The superiority complex thing was uncalled for, you're right. I didn't actually bother with fact checking it, just googled some of the countries, thought: "they're in Africa, some of Africa is in the eastern hemisphere therefore it might be" with a few exceptions any edits beyond spelling corrections by a BoN is generally assumed to be a vandal (despite the fact that most of them aren't). Christopher (talk) 19:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * C'mon — cut the guy some slack, Christopher. It's not easy being a highly articulate baby. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)