User talk:Wikinterpreter/archives2

=Hey too==

Hi, Jackobilius (or is it Jackabilius..?)! D'y'all enjoy 'Oedipus'? MagnificentFiend 19:51, 15 November 2008 (EST)

Hey
Hey Jack! Hi-5 to the legend himself, hope you have a great time at Helvetia (and I met Sanath himself last week!) Sanjetti

Thanks
For not biting :) 16:24, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

Team RationalWiki
I love your idea for a team Rational wiki to compliment CP's team contest. We could do 1 point for creating a sock, 5 points for creating a parody article that lasts 24 hours or more, 5 points for being warned about the 90/10 rule, 20 points for mentioning Icewedge or RW in a way that doesn't get deleted right away. Any other ideas? Stile4aly 12:15, 11 July 2007 (CDT)

OWNED
J00 g0t pwnz0r'd by t3h F0x. --Sid 16:05, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Man CP just seems to be full of such angry people...I dont know how you do it sid, I get a viscerally negative reaction every time i see there crappy color scheme. Reminds of the few times I participated in shock conditioning experiments. 16:09, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * My secret ;) --Sid 16:18, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * 0h n035! t3h ויִכִּ נתֶּר ֶפּ רֶ תֵּ ר  שְׁלֹום!
 * And he yelled at you in Yiddish. Putz.--PalMD-Goatspeed! 16:48, 12 July 2007 (CDT)

Blocked
Congratulations, looks like you got blocked from CP again, just for being a member here. So much for difference #15.--Brian 16:07, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Pff. Fox should gay mit sein kop in drerd. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 16:21, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Go fuck yourself, reindeer boy Fox
 * Aren't you "retired" or something? 16:37, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * He left and never came back, don'cha know? --Kels 17:02, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Oy, nebbish! Gai kakhen afenyam, eh? -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 16:42, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Andres, is there any language you don't know??? Nu?--PalMD-Goatspeed! 16:49, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Linear B? --ויִכִּ נתֶּר ֶפּ רֶ תֵּ ר  שְׁלֹום!
 * (He googled for it, the loser.) Nebbish???? Go fuck your mother - I fought for what I believe in on three battlefields, and my eldest 2 children are both in Israel right now doing exactly the same. Next year, I shall be retiring permanently back to Israel, and serving my time as a reservist standing up for what I believe in. You on the other hand are just a cyber warrior. Fuck you and the reindeer you rode in. Cunt. How dare you call me nebbish - its not even your fucking language, you havent earned the right to use that language you nazi arse licker. I'd tear you a new fucking arsehole and make you wear it like a hat if you were here right now.
 * I'll have you know that we have no reindeer in this country, sir. Please get your facts straight. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 16:54, 12 July 2007 (CDT)

Finnish nazi
 * Man CP is just like a magnet for the seriously mentally unstable....wow... 17:05, 12 July 2007 (CDT)


 * Two out of two wrong, good sir. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 16:59, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * The Finn was Aulius. His written English wasn't great, as opposed to our Great Dane.--PalMD-Goatspeed! 17:02, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * His Finnish was probably better, through. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 17:09, 12 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Ooooh, the Christian love just drips off the postings by this one doesn't it! Weird fixation with "nazi arse" too, I'd hate to be subjected to his video collection. liessmoke mirrors 19:45, 12 July 2007 (CDT)

main page
how's about something in koine greek under the rationalwiki. feel free to use la or ta.... ДιЯɖі$ɧ   ɥοםЄʟ βЯƏакĐΩωΝ  11:36, 13 July 2007 (CDT)

Enjoy your away time
See you when you get back! 14:28, 13 July 2007 (CDT)

Check the forums. 14:40, 13 July 2007 (CDT)

He iz back!
And he has a flavour! ... Or something. >_> -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 16:06, 22 July 2007 (CDT)
 * I haven't seen you in a long time. Resident vandal
 * Wikinterpreter never responded to me. I don't think wikinterpreter likes me. Resident vandal
 * Aww. You know that's not true. [[Image:Th hug.gif]] -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 16:42, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Whee, can we have that for the wlcome lovebomb? Keepthe faith 16:53, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
 * I was thinking of making my own version of the welcome template (mostly with my silly "welcome to the dollhouse" line). I see no reason why we couldn't make  for those who prefer its style. human be in 16:59, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Use it all you wish. It's meant to be used. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 18:30, 24 July 2007 (CDT)

Mudkipzzzzz
At least I didn't shoop him... --Kels 17:13, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

Die Juden?!
Jewish eh? Israeli or otherwise?

Siz sver tzu zein a Yid!--PalMD-Goatspeed! 18:12, 26 July 2007 (CDT)

No Yiddish, just Hebrew, Shmendrik.

Merhaba, habibi? User:PalMD

Hey
You are a nice enough guy. I'll teach you if you haven't figured it out by the time I get my sysop powers restored. HeartOfGold 17:24, 31 July 2007 (CDT)

Friendly message from Project whitewash
You are receiving this message because you signed up to participate at project whitewash. If you no longer want to here from me about this then just remove your name or let me know. I want to create a push to get as thorough coverage as possible for two new categories the first is Category:Best of RationalWiki and the second is Category:Almost the best of RationalWiki. Both categories should tell you what belongs in each. If you could take some time to go through the article space and the essay space and label these with the corresponding categories it would be very helpful. Godspeed. 13:39, 10 August 2007 (CDT)

Blockage
Are you still blocked on conservapedia? Bohdan=
 * Have you thought about appealing? Bohdan
 * You should know better than that, Bohdan. As if his blaspheming against Andy wasn't enough to consign him enternally to Liberalism, now that he has posted here, he is forever one of the Unclean, unwelcome within the shining gates of Conservapedia.   --Gulik 21:11, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

Re:Welcome
"Czar Yah" emailed me a link to here when he saw me having a discussion with the guys at Conservapedia, saying I should check it out when I was inevitably banned. When I was banned, I figured it would be worth a look. Rangeley 21:04, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

Welcome!
to Rationalwiki 2.1 -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
 * Why thankyou, Wikinterpreter, I'm very glad to be here. How are you these days?
 * Uh, terrible actually. Feeling really ill. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
 * Sorry to hear that; I'm great - looking forward to Usman Haque on Sunday. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!

Fun:Ã—Â
What did you use to have this as? Fun:Ã—Â ?

VirileSterileblah, blah, blah 13:26, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

What are the haps?
For what it's worth, I don't have any idea what's going on either, and I didn't even go anywhere. ALSO: You need to update your talk page sig link, since we don't use that index.php thingy anymore? -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 14:16, 25 September 2007 (EDT)

Next time
Next time Newton archives his talk page, let him, we'll just link it to the front page. CЯacke ® 20:44, 29 September 2007 (EDT)

Some help, please!
This  article is clearly racist and so far over the top it isn't funny...they need to be embarassed by it. --<font color="#00FFAA" face="Berlin Sans FP">--ИїģḥŤ¤Ṭŗáìṇ <font color="DC143C">♦Τάļќ ǃ 21:26, 30 September 2007 (EDT)

Thanks, fella :)
--Robledo 17:31, 28 November 2007 (EST)


 * Robledo is a troll, do not feed him. Prussian1488 17:32, 28 November 2007 (EST)


 * This is delicious cake; I must feed it to a troll. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!

Hey
We really miss you over at Liberapedia! Ajuk 11:13, 9 December 2007 (EST)

Blogs4Brownback days
Yep! That's me! Oh those were the good ol' days... too bad he couldn't keep the farce up.

hey
Haven't seen you in a while. Bohdan 21:22, 18 December 2007 (EST)
 * So, what are you talking about here: user:Bohdan [[Image:N544023135_90578_6551.jpg|35px|]] 20:38, 19 December 2007 (EST)
 * So is that IP actually you? It claims to be. user:Bohdan [[Image:N544023135_90578_6551.jpg|35px|]] 20:41, 19 December 2007 (EST)

wandalism
That's awesome... it's totally staying that way. Yay for the new world order! --<b style="color:#FF4488">Eira</b> <sup style="color: #FF00FF">yay! 21:25, 18 December 2007 (EST)

Bad news
You bears it.- 20:44, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Biscuit
I have no further interest in this petty altercation, as I have, uh, more important plans to pursue for the moment. You can have the biscuit if you want it so badly. Although I'm afraid it got a bit... singed by that nuclear device you happened to drop over my territory. Here.

-- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 19:46, 20 December 2007 (EST)

RationalBlogs
I may have already added you, but if you're interested, contact me. --<font color="#00FF00">Linus (plot evil tech) 16:53, 21 December 2007 (EST)
 * Cool. If you're not added already, just tell me. --<font color="#00FF00">Linus (plot evil tech) 20:22, 22 December 2007 (EST)
 * Working on it. --20:54, 22 December 2007 (EST)
 * Ah, I see the issue. What was the URL you wanted? --<font color="#00FF00">Linus (plot evil tech) 20:55, 22 December 2007 (EST)
 * Done. Login at http://interpretation.rationalblogs.org/wordpress/wp-login.php. --<font color="#00FF00">Linus (plot evil tech) 21:17, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Γεια!
I remember having a short discussion with you on the Greek language forever ago. I just thought I'd let you know that I've recently tried to picked it up again.  Г <font color="#ffbe00">☭  длесс Либерал  22:22, 21 December 2007 (EST)


 * Use thisfor 10% off on RosettaStone. :P  --TK/MyTalk|undefined 01:09, 22 December 2007 (EST)


 * Haha, it's still $200!  Г <font color="#ffbe00">☭  длесс Либерал  09:49, 22 December 2007 (EST)

No, not "liek". "Can has".
important distinktiun. -- I CAN HAS MUDKIPS? 21:10, 22 December 2007 (EST)
 * cheezburger cat is vastly superiur to longcat. --[[Image:Mudkip.png|16px]] I CAN HAS MUDKIPS? 21:21, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Forum
"Far from the Madding Crowd"? --<font color="#00FF00">Linus (plot evil tech) 21:51, 29 December 2007 (EST)


 * Yes. You leave something there? --TK/MyTalk|undefined 21:59, 29 December 2007 (EST)

Username
Do you mind if I simply change it to "Interpreted" outright? --<font color="#00FF00">Linus (plot evil tech) 23:29, 29 December 2007 (EST)

Petra
You been to Petra? - jealous! 193.113.235.168 11:58, 30 December 2007 (EST)
 * I've been there twice! [[Image:jollyfish.gif|25px]]<font color=Blue>Genghis Marauding 18:41, 3 January 2008 (EST)

pwnage
Can you do that with the picture of GodlessLiberal thats on the wiki somewhere? user talk:Bohdan 17:37, 3 January 2008 (EST)

You are amazing
Thank you very much. Now I will go pwn GL. user talk:Bohdan 17:54, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Metapedia and New Gwenson
All I did was type "New Gwenson" into Google and look at the results... >_> Uchiha KATON! 18:36, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Sensible Web Sites
If you don't advertise other secular web sites on your main page, the others won't advertise you prominently either.Barbara Shack 11:08, 7 January 2008 (EST)

image problem
Image:The-new-godspeed?.jpg is broken - did it ever work? I suspect that question mark is raising hell with the wiki software... <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">human  05:10, 14 January 2008 (EST)

Captain Obvious arguments = ban?
Can I give a thirty-second block to Rational Thinker for being willfully unthoughtful? -- 18:14, 27 January 2008 (EST)
 * Only if you give one to me too for saying yes. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום
 * Can do! :-)  -- 18:16, 27 January 2008 (EST)

lol :)
Good work, fella. --Robledo 14:56, 18 February 2008 (EST)
 * Truly, a work of art. Editor at RWwas rooting for HD DVD 15:03, 18 February 2008 (EST)

24.1.56.87
I'm trusting you to keep an eye on ths troll? <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">human  21:50, 23 February 2008 (EST)
 * I don't see that there's anything wrong with the liberal talk radio stuff, as long as it's cited, but I'm keeping a razorsharp watch for the other stuff. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום
 * I reverted most of the LTR stuff, although I was conflicted about doing so. If the article turns into a "hit piece" on them, it should also have more cites of good stuff. (cf:wp:air america radio, where the whackos want to keep pronouncing it dead, bankrupt, etc.)  I just wanted to make a "safe harbor" place where LTR at least got covered.  And the host I deleted - if bunchanumbers can't bother to alphebetize, I have little sympathy.  If bunchanumbers wants to write an awesome article about Randi Rhodes' "accident", so be it, I suppose.  The host he added, he only added because of the scandal - and at least PBC has come clean over recent releases of info and washed his hands.  Odd how bunchanumbers is not editing articles like Rush Limbaugh, eh?  Anyway, as I said, I'm staying in the wings and trusting you. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">human  21:59, 23 February 2008 (EST)
 * Re: LTR, I can live with your work, thank you. The "balance" may now be in favor of reporting a trivial scandal, but then, it's up to others to add more "positive" meat, if they wish. PS, I gave bunchanumbers a timeout - mostly for making the same edits over and over again while simply attacking RW on talk pages.  I'm sure he/she/it will return, though. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">human  22:23, 23 February 2008 (EST)
 * Yeah, it's harder for him to just revert as 'vandalism' something that he wrote. Also, reverse trolling FTW! --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום
 * Also, re the block, thanks. I'm going sleepy-time now. My mental state is fragile as a result of having to listen to Rick Astley's 'Never Gonna Give You Up' for 3 hours straight (I can't force quit my way out of it because I've got something I'd lose in another window). --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום
 * Putting that link up is an act of cruelty. You were hoping some curious fool would click on it, weren't you?  You evil, evil, fruitcake!  -- 14:11, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 * That video is probably the campiest thing I've seen this month. Almost made me miss the '80s. Good work. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 14:37, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 * True, true. Nice work. It is interesting, that many of our "vandal" hotspots only require undoing an edit to "re-vandalize" - we should do more than just rollback, in some cases, we should "whitewash", or add an edit or two.


 * I just changed my one hour (block) to one day (you're welcome) for his editing PFoster's user page . There's making a case, and there's vandalism and disrespect. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">human  22:30, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Reminders to self

 * Policy stuff. Day Zero of the TK return is nearly upon us.
 * Paul - confused, not bigot.

--מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום 20:16, 2 March 2008 (EST)

Ron Paul
We both frequent the asshole of teh interbutts (I think?). I hate to beg, but... I am certainly not above it! Interpreted, would you support me for demotion? :3 Uchiha KATON! 01:47, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Firefox
Your user page crashes my browser. )-: Brianetta Brian Ronald, UK. Talk here 18:20, 5 March 2008 (EST)

Unblocked from CP
here. &mdash; Unsigned, by: NightFlare / talk / contribs
 * I was just on my way to WIGO with this as well - WOW! Look, you even got an apology! --Sid 06:14, 7 March 2008 (EST)

Debate
There is a debate going down at 9 eastern. Please be there. Dress accordingly. TmtamesP 19:50, 12 March 2008 (EDT)
 * Dress accordingly? Let's see, I'm debating with you so... mismatched socks, loud plaid shirt, fruit-patterned pants and no underwear oughta' do it.  -- 23:17, 12 March 2008 (EDT)

I hate to be the one to have to tell you, but your spirit is a real party pooper, a total killjoy. Not at all like the material Interpreted. TmtamesP 18:15, 13 March 2008 (EDT)

That sounds like a fancy way of saying "my spirit is a spoilsport". TmtamesP 19:28, 13 March 2008 (EDT)

I don't know, is it? TmtamesP 19:41, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
 * And if it is, is he wearing clogs? -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 19:42, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
 * Made of hardened, calcified, goatskin. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום
 * We could use wikinterpreter's opinion in the dutch/dane origin contoversy. TmtamesP 19:45, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
 * We all know that you're one and the same - you, Bohdan, and you, AKjeldsen - it gave it away when you gave your secondary identity the last two letters of your first name. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום
 * Wait, are you a dutch/dane? TmtamesP 19:46, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
 * Nah, I am made of British, although with Romani on one half of the family, by way of WWII. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום


 * Yes, I'm sure you could use his opinion, since you're getting so completely schooled. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 19:48, 13 March 2008 (EDT) Admittedly, that sounded better in my head.
 * Please, keep an open mind. TmtamesP 19:49, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
 * Honestly, it's hard for me not to like the Danes after their actions during the occupation.-- [[Image:Asclepius staff.png|8px]]-PalMD -- 19:50, 13 March 2008 (EDT)

Please come join rwww. We are going to critique rww (especially yesterdays scandal) and perhaps, as an aside, analyze the anti-clog movement. We need you. TmtamesP 11:52, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
 * We are trying to discuss site policy on rwww. A disruptive Danish user disputes the NDPOV decision. What should be done? TmtamesP 16:07, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
 * There was a "decision"? Who made this "decision"? Are there any logs of an open discusison preceding this alleged "decision"? Or is this simply a case of a group of oligarchic god-kings trying to hide the arbitrary introduction of policy behind the vague notion of a "consensus"? -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 16:14, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
 * Can't you at least compliment me for my use of alliteration? TmtamesP 16:17, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
 * Fair enough. Good work there. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 16:24, 16 March 2008 (EDT)

Community Standards
I put some suggestions on RationalWiki talk:Community Standards to help progress the conversation in a new direction. I view it as a community wide discussion, not arbitration for a specific case. Please comment there. Sterilexx 17:47, 25 March 2008 (EDT)

Request
I apparently need your permission to be renamed Wikinterpretererer. What do you say? Please? TmtamesP 01:26, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

Thank you for giving me permission. You are truly a wonderful Brit. TmtamesP 14:33, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Oscar, DoggedamesP, TmtamesP, Wikinterpretererer... you'll always be Bohdan to us. -- 14:40, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

Fascist
Please stop blocking people left and right. Let nature run its course. You know, social Darwinism and all that. SHahB 13:41, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * That's a good point. Care to make the same point to, say, Karajou? -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 14:15, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Stop asking for things. Can't you be grateful for the one good point? SHahB 14:23, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * But I am! In fact, I'm so grateful for it that I want to see it spread even further. See new horizons and all that. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 14:34, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Chauvinist. You give our country a bad name. SHahB 14:41, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, I think it manages that quite well on its own. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 15:35, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Nonsense! Der er et yndigt land! Don't ever speak ill of Denmark, svin! SHahB 15:39, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Tjah, jeg synes nu nok, at glansen er gået en smule af Skt. Gertrud her på det sidste. Sådan cirka de sidste otte-ti år. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 15:47, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * You speak a strange, gutter dialect. SHahB 15:56, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Sorry, I'll try to speak slower: I do think that the shine has gone a bit off Saint Gertrude recently. Such as in the last eight to ten years or so. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 16:01, 10 April 2008 (EDT) Service announcement: The expression "the shine has gone off Saint Gertrude" is a quote from Jørgen-Frantz Jacobsen's novel Barbara: Roman, being quite similar in meaning to "how the mighty have fallen".
 * No, that was not slower. That was in ENGLISH.  Big difference.  The fact that you never finished school explains the less-than-perfect Danish.  But, it's indeed a tough language to grasp.  No need to be ashamed. SHahB 16:04, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * You use the Danish of Malk de Koijn. Embarassing to the rest of us. SHahB 16:06, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Your terminal confusion is growing more and more apparent with each passing day. Malk de Koijn was a brilliant and innovative group that greatly enriched the Danish language. Only a clueless individual hopelessly lost to the obscuring mists of a reactionary Morten Korch-esque nostalgia - such as yourself - would deny this obvious fact. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 16:12, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Tommy Seebach, may he rest in peace, did more for our language that anyone. And we already know your opinion of him. SHahB 16:14, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh! Yes, yes, indeed. Truly! Who can forget such flowers of language as "Disco Tango al a carte/og godt med garniture/flugt og fart." Brilliant! Surpasses Oehlenschläger by a wide margin! -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 16:21, 10 April 2008 (EDT) That was sarcasm, in case your terminal confusion made you miss that.
 * I am fast getting tired of you impertinence, you immature hothead. Stop making such vile attacks against a national hero. SHahB 16:24, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Ja, ja, ja. Æd en kiks, tudefjæs. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 16:26, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * I've gotta say, my online translator translated that as "Eat a biscuit, howl-mugs," which I can only assume is exactly what you meant. ThunderkatzHo! 19:05, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 * A very accurate translation, although I would assume a lot of the cultural baggage of the expression is lost. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 07:04, 11 April 2008 (EDT)

(undent) hey, Terpetrater, I'm not so sure that blocking people who seem to be having a little spat is a good route to solution. If anything, a neutral third party trying to help them reconcile while still on line would seem more productive. The danger of blocking is someone might have something they want to say (a potentially defusing statement), and they can't. Will they even know that the other party was also blocked? Will they think to research it? Just some random devalued US cents. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">human  21:49, 11 April 2008 (EDT)

I don't need to read this thread to know what's going on. The header told me all I need to know. -- 13:03, 14 April 2008 (EDT)

I believe it's time to roll out a little something I said at another time and another place. "You're all a bunch of fascists. You go home to your fascist little homes, eat fascist food made by your fascist little spouses, raise your fascist children, who grow up and get fascist careers (such as 'wiki sysop'), and you retire to a fascist retirement home, where your fascist grandchildren come and visit you." Thank you. That is all. -- 13:03, 14 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Fascism is the new black! -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 13:41, 14 April 2008 (EDT)

Why did you block me?
Today I took a peek into my block log and noticed that you blocked me for 25 minutes on March 25th. That's not too much of a big deal. I didn't notice it at the time. I looked back at what I'd been doint that day and found that I was editing about Pontius Pilate. I also edited about Richard Carrier's suggestion that Jesus may have survived the crucifixion. I edited constructively that day. There now is a new article Surviving crucifixion. How did I deserve that block? It can be difficult to fight your corner especially when  there's a suspected Christian trying to prevent stuff against Christianity getting into RationalWiki.

Next time  that happens it will be more difficult for me to fight the Christians. Any sysop who suspects me of edit warring will see the entry in the Block Log. Then the sysops will be more likely to put down the bann hammer and for longer  than 25 minutes. I'll have to be more careful how I edit in future. Christians may succeed in stopping me putting constructive material into the Wiki. Can the block log be amended to prevent  that?Barbara Shack 08:59, 24 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Who's that "suspected Christian"?! Tell us soon so we can brainwash him/her. No, really, Barbara: this is not Atheistwiki. We are not here to "fight the Christians". There are other places for that. (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 09:27, 24 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, and I wouldn't take the 25 minute block so seriously. Everybody that I know of has been blocked here. Usually for a few seconds, but still. Only one user that I know of has been "banhammered" (that is, a quite long block): TK. No one will banhammer you, and not for those 25 minutes. (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 09:31, 24 April 2008 (EDT)


 * Barabara, Interepreted and Linus are RW's resident peacemongers. So when they think a discussion is getting to heated they just block everyone for a short cooling off period. Nothing personal against you.  Lily Ta, wack! 10:38, 24 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Barbara, we're not that formal here by any stretch of the imagination, I've never looked @ anyone's block log. Anyhow, as t'scouser says, he blocked about 20 (premusably all who'd been on line around the time) in a fit of peacemaking. chill! 10:47, 24 April 2008 (EDT)


 * Suspected Christians?! At our Wiki?! By Jove! Where? Where? ... Oh, wait, I'm one. Guess I'd better get back to the nefarious plotting, then. [[Image:Plotting.gif]] -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 10:49, 24 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Burn the witch! Burn the witch! 10:54, 24 April 2008 (EDT)
 * I should inform you that I intend to blow up Parliament shortly - and indeed in a most despicable manner - so you'd better hurry. Cheers! [[Image:Guyfawkes.gif]] -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 11:01, 24 April 2008 (EDT)

I'm even more frightened now. What do you plan to use? Gunpowder? Dinamite?Barbara Shack 11:23, 24 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Gunpowder, I expect. It's sort of traditional. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 12:49, 24 April 2008 (EDT)
 * I'm using something even more explosive than gunpowder; the TRUTH! OK, I'll stop it with the ultra-cheesy soundbitery.


 * SRS BSNS - I'm not just a 'suspected Christian', I'm a full-blown Quisling-scum (not Danish) example of the Christian kind. Anyway, when reading the blocklog, it helps to have a full picture of what was going on, before making accusations.

15:28, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked PFoster (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page; great Scott, I missed a few!) (unblock)

15:28, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Human (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page; great Scott, I missed a few!) (unblock)

15:28, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked NightFlare (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page; great Scott, I missed a few!) (unblock)

15:27, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Editor at CP (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:26, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Radioactive afikomen (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:24, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Jeeves (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page; also, we try to avoid permab& here.) (unblock)

15:23, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked Jeeves (Talk | contribs) ‎ (to reblock)

15:23, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked TmtamesP (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:23, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Interpreted (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:23, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Barbara Shack (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:22, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Edgerunner76 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:22, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Zmidponk (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:22, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Genghis Khant (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:22, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked AmesG (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:22, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked RyanB (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:22, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked PoorEd (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:22, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked MarcusCicero (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:22, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Sterile (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:22, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked DLerner (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

15:22, 25 March 2008 Interpreted (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Cracker (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) ‎ (See Talk:Main Page) (unblock)

When excrement hits the circulators, and we are in a full-scale DRAMA WAR (Dramacon 3, by the way; we've only gone up to 2 on a few TK-based occasions, and Linus has the huge nuclear wiki-wide b&hammer to deal with Dramacon 1), I've found it a generally good idea to ban everyone who was involved at the time - gives people a chance to cool off, etc. I don't recall that you were involved in this particular incident, but, in order to stay fair, and not favour one side, I just ban everyone. It also helps to stop people getting dragged in.


 * No 'fighting the Christians' necessary; anyway, fighting Christians isn't fair, because Jesus tells them not to fight back. ;) --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום
 * Wait, why did you block me? SHahB 13:29, 24 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Because I can. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן שְׁלֹום
 * Fascist. SHahB 13:33, 24 April 2008 (EDT) ps could you take a look at the Kierkegaard page? There is some serious Danish revisionism going on.  Perhaps you could bring some of your excellent sources to the table?  Best regards.
 * Henry: I have reviewed the Kierkegaard article and found it to be immaculate. No one has yet identified any errors with this article. I am looking forward to learning from your valuable contributions. Please open your mind. Goatspeed. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 14:39, 24 April 2008 (EDT)

I think Barbara's issue has been addressed fairly clearly. However, &terpreted: "I've found it a generally good idea to ban everyone who was involved at the time - gives people a chance to cool off, etc." I must say (and have, above?) that I disagree. The 20 minute emptying of the room prevents people from working anything out, and any given person may think they were the only one blocked, which would make things tenfold or thirteenfold worse. Look at poor Barbara - she's concerned that having a block history will stain her character in some hypothetical future administrative kerfluffle (PS, Barbara, it really won't - I'm gonna go block you for a few minutes after saving this, just to prove it!). <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">human  21:10, 24 April 2008 (EDT)


 * OK I wasn't singled out. I didn't know that yesterday.Barbara Shack 07:06, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
 * Which makes my point above - it would be quite unusual for a blocked user to check the IPblocklist out of curiosity. All they are likely to see is 1. they were blocked and, perhaps can't tell why, and 2. any comments on their talk page about the block.  Which could lead to a fair amount of confusion, for no good reason. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">human  14:13, 25 April 2008 (EDT)

Jesus Hallelujah Christ, archive your page already
It's getting too long. -- 11:42, 28 April 2008 (EDT)

Deletion and resurrection
When you deleted Angband's talk page then restored it, why did you bury the entire history, rather than just the specific part(s) Angband wanted you to get rid of? Or did he want you to do that? Although I understand that you did resurrect most of the text (minus whatever Angband wanted removed, I assume), eliminating access to the diff links violates an important principle on RationalWiki, as one of the few things that differentiates us from Conservapedia. -- 14:12, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
 * He didn't remove anything actually (unless it was already buried in the now-dead history), but I have to say its still quite tasteless to do that, I'm restoring the page now. NightFlareSpeak, mortal 14:18, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
 * Well, maybe I exaggerated with the tasteless part, but we shouldn't be hiding things like this. Sorry if I was too mean. NightFlareSpeak, mortal 14:37, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh, I see. I thought there was just an attempt that failed to extirpate the page's history, but I'm behind the curve on what's been done. <font color="#DD00DD" face="comic sans ms">human  14:37, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

Thoughts?
As someone who reads the Bible in its original languages, I figure you're more qualified than anyone else here to comment on this; I'd like to know your thoughts on the transliteration article. Any suggestions or improvements you can think of? I'll be the first to admit that I'm woefully unqualified to be one writing this article. -- 12:51, 21 May 2008 (EDT)

unblock
Wikinterpreter, what has happened to you? You haven't made any edits in a few months. If you would like to be unblocked at conservapedia, let me know. I am offering you a high ranking position (General Secretary perhaps) in the Conservapedia Danish Writers Group if you accept. Regards. Bohdan2 23:09, 25 July 2008 (EDT)
 * I was wrong, you are not currently blocked. Please, please come back to conservapedia to join the DWG. Bohdan2 14:22, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

OHHAI!
-- 17:14, 3 November 2008 (EST)

Commiserations
You've been blocked again at Conservapedia. Proxima Centauri 11:11, 9 November 2008 (EST)
 * Meh, it comes, it goes. I'm drafting a grovelling email to him now asking, among other things, whether they want to ban devoted contributors, given that no less than six vandals have registered in the time that it's taken me to write the email out. If that fails, then I do have a truly ancient, clean sock who can be resurrected. --<font color="#111111">מְ<font color="#222222">תֻ<font color="#333333">רְ<font color="#444444">גְּ<font color="#555555">מָ<font color="#666666">ן<font color="#777777"> וִ<font color="#888888">י<font color="#999999">קִ<font color="#aaaaaa">י          שְׁלֹום!

By the way:

Hi Mr Ugler!

I've been blocked twice in one day. One of the nicer sysops did me the first time. I tried to edit his talk page which the ban window said I could do. When I couldn't edit his talk page I made a sockie and [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment#I_don.27t_trust_you. I told him what I thought of him]. Bugler did me for aggression. I've got a dynamic IP. I can make sockies whenever I like. I just don't do it so often that I get range blocked. I can't see much point in editing that rubbish anyway. I improved 2 of their articles. I said that Jesus is mythology and that God doesn't exist. They blocked me, called it vandalism and reverted to the inacurate versions. Proxima Centauri 12:52, 9 November 2008 (EST)

It's "no fewer", Jack!MagnificentFiend 23:42, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

User:Interpreted/women
Are you going to finish this? If my essay's so unreasonable, surely it should be easy to rebut? Oh, and why don't you unfuck your user page; I can't, for example, get to your talk from it. Fall down 17:08, 12 November 2008 (EST)