Talk:The Lost Symbol

I'm not giving too much away if I say that Dan B has the CIA being responsible for security in Washington. I thought they were banned from operating in that way on US soil?--BobBring back the hat! 22:09, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Delete Delete Delete
This isn't a book club. Acei9 06:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * But can be merged with The Da Vinci Code. Acei9 06:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The Lost Symbol has a hell of a lot more pseudoscience than than the Da Vinci code. If they were merged it would have to be under "Books by Dan Brown". I'm not sure it would be a big improvement.--BobSpring is sprung! 06:30, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It just seems strange because there are numerous books containing pseudoscience. Should we have articles of them all? Also, Da Vinci Code introduced the character and propelled him to fame so would make sense to have the under Da Vinci Code.....not that I have read or will read any of his books. Acei9 06:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we should have articles on all influential/well known books which contain pseudoscience. It would be more logical than many of the articles on countries, states, musicians and science fiction authors which grace our pages.--BobSpring is sprung! 07:04, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * But wouldn't the smart, and economic, thing to do would be to highlight the author as opposed to each book he/she has written? Acei9 07:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I vote for the one article on Dan Brown with sections on each of the abominations he has written. I mean, there isn't much to say about Digital Fortress beyond 256 bit encryption being cracked in real time. Jack Hughes (talk) 08:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually the subsections could all be: the hero has to race around ... solving strange enigmas while showing how clever he is to a pretty girl. 12:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Not all of them, but certainly the ones that are significant nexuses of the woo, as this is - David Gerard (talk) 14:02, 1 July 2010 (UTC)