User talk:FIGHT THE NEW WORLD ORDER

There is a cat on my bed that has been there since this morning 22:49, 8 December 2007 (EST)


 * What kind of cat is it? I like cats. FIGHT THE NEW WORLD ORDER 22:50, 8 December 2007 (EST)
 * Er ... welcome, I think. Someone will come along to inform you that belief in a 'new world order' is merely an externalisation and creation of an 'other' to help polarise conflicts, but I'll just tell you that CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
 * The new world order is real! I don't want to hear you stupid lies that it is not. That person has no idea what he is talking about. FIGHT THE NEW WORLD ORDER 22:54, 8 December 2007 (EST)
 * WHAT?!? ELASSINT CREATED A WIKI ALL ABOUT IT!!! Really, the NWO is real! There is a cat on my bed that has been there since this morning 22:56, 8 December 2007 (EST) Oh and it's a black cat named Shadow.
 * Where is this wiki that you speak of? FIGHT THE NEW WORLD ORDER 22:57, 8 December 2007 (EST) Oh, how old is Shadow?

Are my lies WORD stupid  and evil oneness lies? -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
 * They are just wrong, making them lies.Citation needed -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!

What does porn have to do with the NEW WORLD ORDER? --SockOfGulik 23:00, 8 December 2007 (EST)
 * Because it enslaves people and forces them to to sexual acts. FIGHT THE NEW WORLD ORDER 23:09, 8 December 2007 (EST)


 * Well, I have an objection to it - not because it's part of the Illuminati/Yalta, but because it's degrading and involves the oppression of men and (more so) women. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!

NWO Wiki. There is a cat on my bed that has been there since this morning 23:00, 8 December 2007 (EST)
 * Oh noes, now we must guard that wiki too. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
 * ? There is a cat on my bed that has been there since this morning 23:09, 8 December 2007 (EST)
 * Sorry, just assumed that it was a good rational thing. I might engage in some petty wandalism there later, if this guy doesn't stop. >:) - מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!

Why do you bother reverting? We'll just wait till you get bored and change it back. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!

Did I read that right? Vandalise the NWO Wiki? Do not take this there.

"Vandalism is a crime."

-Elassint, Illogicopedia, 2007.

There is a cat on my bed that has been there since this morning 23:14, 8 December 2007 (EST)
 * Wandalism would increase the average quality of IP. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!

-_- There is a cat on my bed that has been there since this morning 23:25, 8 December 2007 (EST)

Yea, your crazy Wikinterpreter.

Reverts
Please make edits that will parse correctly. For instance, what, pray might this mean? "The small lack of concrete evidence of plotting..."

Thank yous, CЯacke ® 23:15, 8 December 2007 (EST)

Good morning
As previously advised, I am here to inform you that belief in a 'new world order' is merely an externalisation and creation of an 'Other' to help polarise conflicts. That is all. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 06:14, 9 December 2007 (EST)

Revert War
What's going on? I was having fun. --Edgerunner  76 10:31, 12 December 2007 (EST)

Put up or Shut up
EITHER GIVE SOME DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OR SHUT THE F*** UP Susan  purrrrr ...  12:37, 12 December 2007 (EST)
 * Susan, Susan. Surely you must realize that no such evidence can exist, because the New World Order has suppressed it and are persecuting anyonhe who try to bring their nefarious dealings to light. In fact, the complete lack of evidence is in itself the best documentation for the existence of the New World Order. -- AKjeldsen Godspeed! 13:18, 12 December 2007 (EST)


 * (whines) but he gets on my Nerves! Susan purrrrr ...  13:26, 12 December 2007 (EST)

Head meet desk
No, no, no, no no. No. While, yes, there was a plot by the the neocon movement to increase American hegemony across the world (as laid out in the Project for a New American Century or whatever the hell it was called) it 1) never involved the UN, 2) had nothing to do with the traditional ideas of the NWO (which involved the LOSS of American sovereignty), and 3) has come nowhere near fulfillment, as the neocons have instead destroyed a good chunk of American hegemony. Quit worrying about that which does not exist. Researcher 13:50, 12 December 2007 (EST)
 * Well put. Mr. R. human  21:56, 22 December 2007 (EST)

How it works here
Okay, here's the thing. As things currently stand, we do have looser documentation than Wikipedia, but that's not something that should be encouraged. You're welcome to contribute, yes, but something like this, you're going to have to do a lot of documentation to prove it. Not a big deal, but when you're shouted down and mocked like you've been, the burden on you is to defend yourself. Prove your point, please. EVDebs 16:28, 12 December 2007 (EST)


 * I'm not in the Super-Secret Ruling Cabal here, and I _like_ conspiracy theories. Nonetheless, I think you really should try not to sound like a NUT when the HORRIBLE FACTS should suffice. --SockOfGulik 12:50, 23 December 2007 (EST)