User talk:GreatAtheismo

Hi. Nice of you to join us from Youtube. If you'd like to know a bit more about the site please have a look at our RationalWiki:Newcomers' guide.--BobNot Jim 17:43, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thankyou, I'll be sure to have a flick through the guide to make sure I don't break anything. GreatAtheismo (talk) 17:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Just had a look at a couple of your Youtube videos - hilarious. What took you so long to sign up here? :-) --BobNot Jim 18:28, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments about my videos, they look pretty ordinary but I had to learn about video editing as I went so they took me a while to make. The reason I haven't signed up beforehand is that I'm more of an observer, I prefer to sit back and watch you guys embarrass Andy because you all do such a great job of it - mind, not that he can't embarass himself occasionally constantly. =P GreatAtheismo (talk) 18:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Darn, I could have sworn you were already one of us! But belated welcome anyway. 18:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Who says I'm not? Perhaps this account is just me being deceitful sneaky. Oh dear, now I get to have fun as you try to figure out whether I'm a sock or not! GreatAtheismo (talk) 18:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Could I just encourage you to put something - even (or, perhaps, especially) a link to your of your Youtube videos on your userpage so as to stop it being red on recent changes? Cheers.
 * Edit conflict. Mnnnn and if you were a sock then I wouldn't have needed to ask.  But of course you could have thought of that and ... Life is so difficult.  :-) --BobNot Jim 18:59, 10 July 2009 (UTC)


 * According to certain people atheists are inherently deceitful so it wouldn't be a surprise. Hey, you may even be one of my socks! 19:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I am Offended that my Name was not Included.--Tolerance (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Sorry for not adding you in the original list. Or maybe it's a ploy; maybe I am Tolerance and I didn't add myself to throw everyone off? Bwahahahaaa. GreatAtheismo (talk) 19:38, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Given that you characterize yourself as not being a regular contributor, we can immediately whittle your list of possibles down to just two or three. 19:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

(UI)I like the way you're thinking, would it help if I told you that the time my videos were uploaded provides another hint? GreatAtheismo (talk) 19:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know, but to play along, there is no reason to suppose that a statement that you are not a regular contributor is true, though it might be. We can assume that you've been around long enough to know about both the Lenski incident and the much earlier FBI incident.  Beyond that, you also know that the original CP logo had an error "The trussworthy".  And that goes waaaay back - all of which suggest that you are probably an old hand.--BobNot Jim 20:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Goatdamn you Bob, don't out me too soon! 20:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, this is fun. Too bad only a handful have gotten involved or I'd make use of those slider-voting thingies to see how the general RW community does at detective work. Scratch that, everyone would just vote TK, myself included. GreatAtheismo (talk) 20:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Your identity
After messaging you on Youtube... Damn you, I'm intrigued! 15:51, 7 September 2009 (UTC)