Conservapedia talk:Andy Schlafly on Eagle Forum Live

The announcer's comment about needing more content on the PS article doesn't appear in segment 1. 18:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I fixed it. It's at the end of segment 2.  1 & 2 are really two halves of one long bit, so my notes were prior to my chopping it in half...  19:10, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Is it just me, or does it always sound like Phyllis says "welcome to the pogrom"? 02:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Veiled anti-semitism...? Once all the segments are transcribed, will we get rid of the "transcribed" notices next to them as it won't be necessary since all of them will be done? 14:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I still hear it as "program" but I get it like the Alpha program or other mind-bending course. 15:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * SJ, yes, that's what I was planning on doing. For now they just help us figure out what needs doing.  20:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Or pilgrim, since it sound almost exactly the same as that word (allegedly it is pilgrim, but it can be progrom or program) in segment 2.  13:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

And I just did it. Wow, you guys kick ass, I can't believe all the transcribing is done already. 23:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Now what? Should these transcripts be on one page to make reading them easier? What sort of snark are we going to add? 11:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Well done on everyone who transcribing! I dunno about snark. I like teh entries we have describing the segments atm. 12:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Go easy on the congratulations, there are some people who are a bit miffed that they didn't any. 13:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * GK, it's pretty easy to click through them using the prev/next links, they load quickly. As far as snark, I see no reason not to add "Commentary" sections after the transcriptions.  And next comment, what "didn't any" mean huh?  21:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * My bad, it should have been "didn't get any". 05:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Get any to transcribe? Congratulations to them, too, for caring, for reading, for being on the internet, and for being alive. Sorry if I left anyone out!  06:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe someone format it to be like a side-by-side? That may look easier to add comments.  03:57, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I had thought of that, but really, there's no need. Each transcript is only one screen at most (on my awesome monitor anyway).  Just add comments below I think. And don't add a zillion "in line" ref-style jokes, they are really hard to read.  Just add critique in a section below the transcript.  05:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * K, sorry, I didn't mean to say "no". But shall we say, if one has a good idea for side-by-side, edit that one segment to do it and add the commentary? GK, re "Should these transcripts be on one page to make reading them easier?" Yes, I will build that by transcluding them all onto one extra special magic subpage.  Maybe even tonight.  03:11, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[UI] GK I did what you asked, see "the third way" link. 05:29, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Transcripts format
Not to complain about the good work of those who put them together, but does anyone else think it would be better to make use of the quotebox template instead of the normal/bold/italic/PJR formatting currently used. I think the quotebox format works great on things such as Conservapedia:The Zeuglodon Blues. Is there away someone with a bit of geek savvy could make the changes using a bit of regex rather than me doing each edit manually? 18:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)