Talk:Power

I'm wondering if we'd be better off discussing "power" in terms of statistics rather than a small stub on politics. 10:41, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Delete?
Kind of innocuous, not a lot of links, and this doesn't really add anything of value, particularly with the lack of citations and some 1.0-style snark that isn't really funny anymore. -- Seth Peck (talk) 22:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Тy JFBAA 22:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No, It could have some potential, without the snark, to back up various other articles64.180.243.158 (talk) 23:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Like the potential a zygote has? As an agile developer, this would be called a "YAGNI"..."You ain't gonna need it." -- Seth Peck (talk) 23:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * This is vacuous fact-free pontificating about one specific interpretation of power as if it's like the only correct one. Get rid of it.  23:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Move to funspace. Add mention of the Kansas album.  Discuss the difference between three phase and single phase, and transmission and distribution.  Rinse and repeat.  Whatever. Secret Squirrel (talk) 23:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, because those things sound like so much fun. [[image:eyebrow.gif]]  23:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Like I said...whatever :" Secret Squirrel (talk) 23:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)