Talk:Cosmological principle

delete
WP:Cosmological principle Jimmy boy is just pushing his crap again, this time in mainspace ТyUser_talk:Ty 18:34, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Kill it with fire. ThunderkatzHo! 18:39, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Тy, Which part you consider "crap" pardon my French. JimJast (talk) 18:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * If you cannot answer that question yourself I suggest you compare your article to the link above. ТyUser_talk:Ty 18:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Seriously...what's so wrong with the article? I can't see it either. Occasionaluse (talk) 19:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Jim is trying to push the same stuff he does in essay space here. If you wish to provide non JimJastian evidence of his views, or rewrite the article so it is more in line with the accepted views of the cosmological principle, be my guest. It is not so much crap as poorly written POV pushing. ТyUser_talk:Ty 19:06, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ТyUser_talk:Ty, I've just read the stuff you've recommended and still don't see a good reason for deleting it from RW. Why don't you be more specific and tell me what is it all about. JimJast (talk) 19:46, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sagan, Carl. Comos Ballantine books paperback edition chapter ten, page 200 first paragraph. I suggest you read it.ТyUser_talk:Ty 20:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It needs a considerable rewrite, at least. ADK ...I'll fumble your spoon! 20:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Ty, So now you want me to read Carl Sagan, who is dead, and I've seen him once on TV saying that he doesn't believe in the Big Bang anymore. It might just be that you don't have your own opinion in matter of my stuff being "crap". Is "The Templeton Foundation" having something to do with it and you just don't understand what they want from you? JimJast (talk) 21:11, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Vote
The place where you v...its obvious.

Delete

 * KILL IT WITH FIRE! NDSP 21:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * In its current incantation delete. Maybe someone with actual knowledge of physics could rewrite and deJimJastify it, but as it currently stands its not an RW article.  --DamoHi 06:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - JimJast, I think if you want to add content related to your theories, you should at least admit yours is not the mainstream view, and try to fairly cover the mainstream view as well, and any other major non-mainstream views. You haven't done so. If you were to edit the article in the direction I suggest, then I would reconsider my support for deletion. -- 06:51, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

We can't learn what the whole thing is about, can we?
Ty, why don't you pretend that you are a grownup and start talking like a grownup. Or ask the guy who told you to call my stuff "crap" what did he mean, since you don't know and I keep asking. OK? JimJast (talk) 21:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * *Pulls banhammer from under table* NDSP 21:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Why yes Jim, you are absolutely correct. This entire website was created by the foundation to prevent you from discovering Dr. Emmanual Ray's Cube truth. You have not the fortitude to comprehend nature's 4 simultaneous Sun days Rabbit Jesus taught Karl Marx. God evolved from Santa to prevent Kipling Essene scroll fragments to fall into hands of Phoenician Illuminati to prevent Moral ABC Cube truth from destroying Easter Island Spaceship Earth. ТyUser_talk:Ty 21:28, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know enough physics to evaluate Jim's stuff, but if his knowledge of physics is as poor as his knowledge of psychology... Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 21:34, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Neb, since apparently you know psychology much better than I do, tell me why those guys are patting their keyboards? Is it fun for them? They don't have abything else to do? JimJast (talk) 21:47, 3 May 2011 (UTC)