Talk:An Inconvenient Truth

This is on the the to do list and was originally deleted by one person with out any vote taking place (as far as I can see). 13:58, 5 February 2015‎ (UTC)
 * And if it remains in the current state, it will be deleted again. There's no need for a discussion to delete obviously low-quality content.--ZooGuard (talk) 14:07, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with ZooGuard: While the topic is certainly on mission, the actual content is crap. We don't necessarily keep crap articles just because they're within the scope of RW mission. Either it must be improved, or it'll get removed. ScepticWombat (talk) 14:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Finishing the film article: it can't be just a redirect
The article isn't done, I know, but in here put any suggestions on how this should be finished, since I don't want to waste time writing something that might get erased or end up being labeled as trivial. Dandtiks69♪♫ (talk) 19:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * It's on mission and a well needed article. Somebody just needs to rewatch the whole damn powerpoint presentation and write in a synopsis of its claims. Then we also need a section on the massive amount of denialist "debunkings" of an inconvenient truth, followed lastly by some of the sane and correct mainstream criticism of the particular claims made in the movie that have proven to be false or overstated. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 21:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I just watched the whole documentary today for this purpose. Dandtiks69♪♫ (talk) 21:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Fantastic! Well, God speed buddy :) Reverend Black Percy (talk) 21:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Denialist Bunkings?
Does anyone know people or quotes supposedly "debunking" the movie or vice versa? This article needs a section on it, badly. Dandtiks69♪♫ (talk) 16:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * You could start here:


 * http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2007/oct/11/climatechange