Bashar al-Assad

Dear Bashar al-Assad apologists: your hero is a war criminal even if he didn't gas Syrians. Bashar al-Assad (born September 11, 1965) a.k.a. "The Duck Lion of Syria" is the current "president" of the Syrian Arab Republic and (not coincidentally) head of the Syrian Ba'ath Party. Dubya used to outsource torture to him, and his knowledge of torture came from a literal Nazi, assistant to

A little over a decade after he assumed office, the country erupted into civil war. As the war dragged on, both sides got more extreme, and religious fanatics — fresh from years of fighting in — took over the fighting.

Background
He was trained to be an eye surgeon, not a dentist as various media reports have said. When his father died and his brother got in a car accident, Bashar took over the leadership role. The Assads have ruled Syria for years now. The heads of the government and the military are stacked with family members and other Alawites.

He's a native Syrian who attended exclusive French-speaking schools. His First Lady is an investment banker born in London. Under her influence, he tried to modernize the Syrian economy with mixed results. He couldn't manage the water supply as well as his father did, and his attempts at modernization only deepened the stratification of Alawi and non-Alawi.

In a 2003 interview, Assad said " [ Osama bin Laden ] cannot talk on the phone or use the Internet, but he can direct communications to the four corners of the world? This is illogical." Assad also doubted the existence of al-Qaeda:

The players
Bashar is an Alawite, i.e. member of a Shia minority, ruling a 74% Sunni majority country. This alone divides him from Jordan, pre-invasion Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and (of course) his own people. However, he is not alone, as Hezbollah in nearby Lebanon is Shia, which is why they are assisting him in his fight.

Bashar is the son of the former President, Hafez Assad. Hafez was more capable than his son, or at least was able to suppress a Syrian before it became a full-blown civil war (he leveled the city of Hama in 1982, killing some 20,000+ of his own citizens). The event earned the family a bad rep with Islamists who support the Muslim Brotherhood.

Hafez was also, frankly, a dictator who was involved in a lot of Cold War bullshit. As a result, what is playing out in Syria is a lame proxy war with Iran and its allies vs. Saudi Arabia and its allies. Then throw in some U.S. v. Russia dick-waving, with Russia attempting to prop up Assad (their ally) under the guise of "fighting ISIS". The U.S. mostly wants Assad gone but doesn't want groups like Al-Nusra or ISIS to take his place.

2011-2016
The protests against Assad's government began on 26 January 2011; In May, Barack Obama signed an executive order imposing sanctions upon him. Bashar saw what happened to Saddam, and when the Arab Spring heated up, he knew the time had come for the U.S. to change leaders they didn't like. Assad wasn't going to go down without a fight. When munitions and cash poured in from the Saudis, Qatar, and Turkey, he countered by bringing in Hezbollah, Iran, and Russia. Russia and China vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution that would have allowed for international military intervention in Syria.

Obama's "red line", and Assad crossing said line, gave hope to a lot of rebels. Shiites aren't stupid: they knew Assad stood no chance against the U.S. When the said line was not enforced, many interviews showed how disheartened rebels felt by the U.S. and its lackluster support. Instead, the U.S. ordered airstrikes to defend Syrian rebels trained by the U.S. military from any attackers, even if said enemies hail from forces loyal to Assad.

Still, there was increasing pressure coming from Western and Sunni Arab capitals to support an insurgency; the problem is it turned out to be Salafiist, and the situation became so complicated, nobody knows who to support anymore. Assad himself had been described as "Hitler in his bunker" as he didn't seem to know how badly the war was going.

Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes
On April 4, 2017, Assad's government was responsible for a The next day, the newly-minted President Trump decided to get Bashar's attention. It was a surprisingly measured attack: the Pentagon made sure not to put any Syrian (or Russian) air defenses and pilots at risk. This gives Russia an out. Putin doesn't care about Assad, anyway, he wants access to the port of Tartus.

The following day, U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley said that the regime change in Syria "is going to happen." As every observer of the Middle East knows, outside intervention is invariably successful.🇱🇮

Many Trump supporters disliked the action of bombing the Syrian airbase as they wanted Trump to keep his close ties with Russia.

Something good
A secular ideology is a benefit of Putinism.

After a 52-year-old ban, Syrian Kurds were allowed to teach the Kurdish language in schools.

You have a talent for causing things pain
Al Assad, or we set the country on fire.

Saddam murdered more innocent people, but the referee hasn't ended the match yet for Assad; with hard work and determination anything is possible. He oppresses the indigenous minorities of Syria, banning them from speaking their own language, and sends loyal Alawites to settle those areas in order to extract their resources. There are more ways than the neo-colonial method to be "imperialist".