User talk:Tomjones

Lunacy and confirmation bias
"We present regularly updated selections of the finest lunacy the Internet has to offer. Participate in the dialogue." This is written on the MAIN PAGE. Some of the headings under there are chiropractors, acupuncture, alternative medicine, raw foodism and others that are not necessarily mainstream but still would not be called LUNACY by non-biased genuinely scientific rational thinkers interested in true scientific inquiry. My question is how can you be expected to be taken seriously when you present your confirmation bias WIDE OPEN on your main screen? Or is this merely a forum for bullying those with conclusions about data that are different from your own? I honestly and genuinely look forward to learning more through this discussion. Any takers? 😊
 * Also, the fact that you just wrote "non-biased" reveals that your dog must've eaten your homework. Bad dog, indeed. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 01:08, 14 April 2017 (UTC)