User talk:Kar rational

Polar Bear In the Jungle Peter Tosh > Bob Marley 14:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to India
I reverted them because they were full of simple errors in syntax (" although has involved in terrorist acts ") and spacing. Please give it a proper proofreading and reinsert as you will. Polar Bear In the Jungle Peter Tosh > Bob Marley 14:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Removing "openly homophobic"
You'll need to bring up a conversation on why a claim like that needs to be removed on the talk page. Thanks. Polar Bear In the Jungle Peter Tosh > Bob Marley 14:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

"Woo in India"
Again, you need to start a conversation before removing material. If you do it again, I will have to lock the article. Please bring up your objections on the talk page. Polar Bear In the Jungle Peter Tosh > Bob Marley 14:47, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Please stop making major changes to the India article, like deleting whole sections, without prior discussion. Please discuss your concerns & suggested changed on the talk page: talk:India.   14:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello
Greetings, sorry for inconvenience. It was my first edit actually. Please respond so we can continue talk. 'Woo in India'- Please explain what that means. Witchcraft blamed on some rural women - no relations with Ayurveda, it is actually called Tantra practiced by infamous Tantrics. 'Openly homophobic'- give reference. --Kar rational (talk) 15:04, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Polar Bear In the Jungle Peter Tosh > Bob Marley 14:58, 9 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I apologize again, but I'm not a vandal.


 * How may I convince you to display my edits. --Kar rational (talk) 15:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)


 * == Woo in India == - First of all,this heading is meaningless. This paragraph is filled with incorrect statements and which obviously have no references.

Openly homophobic
- In the paragraph titled Gay-rights, it was stated that BJP is openly homophobic.This is factually incorrect blatant accusation without any reference.

Politics
- I had improved this section and deleted other incorrect statements which were without references.--Kar rational (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2013 (UTC)