User talk:67.239.50.209

We don't really do neutral point of view.-- "Shut up, Brx." 05:19, 24 September 2013 (UTC) Why would there be a Wiki with false information then?
 * We don't have false information, not intentionally at least. We have correct information, analysis, and snark.  If you see something you think is false, fix it or bring it up on the talk page.  Don't just replace whole pages.   Wehpudicabok   [話]   [変]  05:43, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Slow down, there, sport, and give it a rest for the next half hour. After that, use the talk pages of articles to discuss changes you'd like to make. Edit warring on your part will not be fruitful. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 08:45, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

You still haven't given an explanation on your deletion. 67.239.50.209 (talk) 08:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * That's unlikely to happen here on the talk page of an anonymous IP. Articles' talk pages is the place for it. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 08:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

This Wiki is just as inaccurate, biased and nonsensical as Conservapedia, as well as the incompetence and favoritism of the administration, I'm done with participating in editing here, bye. 67.239.50.209 (talk) 09:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Aww, shame. BON got upset and went away. Oldusgitus (talk) 10:06, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have a problem with an article you really should take it up on the talk page. People here will certainly be prepared to listen to you and respond to your concerns. Simply editing articles to what you perceive to be correct is unlikely to work - starting debate on the talk page will give you an opportunity to persuade people. In Conservapedia you would be blocked as soon as you started asking questions. That will not happen here.--Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 10:14, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I concur with what the other users have said. You summarized your edits as "adding information," but in fact you removed more than you added, which is why you're not seen favorably so far.  If you want to actually change our minds on this, make your case on the talk page.  I've even gotten it started for you with a new header.  All you have to do is say what you want to change and why, and we'll discuss it there.   Wehpudicabok   [話]   [変]  22:48, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

To Bob, ironic, exactly that happened here, I asked "why did you delete" to Sprocket J Cogswell, then I was blocked. 67.239.50.209 (talk) 02:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * You weren't blocked for asking. You were blocked for edit warring without going to the article's talk page, and the block was for all of 31.41 minutes. I see you're still edit warring, without putting any specifics on those talk pages. Smarten up and start discussing things, if you want your edits to last. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 02:14, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * ... and now you're removing content from your talk page. That's not how things work around here. User talk pages are community property, not yours. Archive if you want, but don't just delete. There is still a possibility that you could find a way to fit in here, but it will take some study on your part. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 02:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

This is the part where we say "scram". Buh bye. Don't hurry back. I'd give you a permanent block but that doesn't really work for IP addresses. EVDebs (talk) 02:43, 25 September 2013 (UTC)