User talk:Aschlafly/Archive2

If you have retired then what are you doing editing? On the unlikely assumption that you are "A Schlafly" then you should know better than to edit the article devoted to you. If you're not "A Schlafly" then you're a deceitful person & your edits mayl be treated with contempt. Susan ... miaow ...  11:28, 20 November 2007 (EST)

Re: deletion of "libel".

The doubtful nature of the content of the article is clearly stated:

This article is possibly the work of a parodist or vandal! It contains suspect information and/or Leftist POV.

Susan ... miaow ...  11:35, 20 November 2007 (EST)

So sue! Susan ... miaow ...  11:53, 20 November 2007 (EST)
 * Please, let's not urge him to do that until I can help :-P - 11:55, 20 November 2007 (EST)
 * By the way, if we were (1) sure that this is the real Andy Schlafly, and (2) presented with real reasons, competently argued here or on the talk page, for removing that material, maybe we would. Mindless blanking doesn't work on this wiki, though, "Andy."- 12:08, 20 November 2007 (EST)
 * so on a scale of 1-10 how much do we care if this is the real aschlafly or not? 12:20, 20 November 2007 (EST)

I don't believe that we are applying Occam's Razor enough here. If this really was Andy, wouldn't he be making a heck of a lot crazier edits and arguing like a wild man on Talk pages? Most of all, there is no way that he would use that picture on his User page here. --Edgerunner  76 12:21, 20 November 2007 (EST)
 * I don't know....depends what the goal was.....his user page is an exact copy of the one at CP. 12:23, 20 November 2007 (EST)
 * I stand corrected. Wow!  Now I can truly except that he is truly mentally ill rather than a simple loon.  --Edgerunner  76 12:25, 20 November 2007 (EST)

Of course, if this were Conservapedia, he'd be banned within minutes for making that sort of edit, and if he tried to discuss it on the talk page he'd be banned for violating the stupid "90/10" rule. If this truly is assfly, it's amusing that what is apparently totally unacceptable on his own wiki he thinks he can do here. --Jeeves 12:36, 20 November 2007 (EST)


 * It's okay because we're all evil liberals with no morals. Haven't you been paying attention? -Master Bra'tacKree! 12:39, 20 November 2007 (EST)

The Question
Mr. Schlafly, what is your position on aglets? Gift from God or work of Satan?  - The Question   ...but what is the answer? 12:33, 20 November 2007 (EST)

Hi
I'm really looking forward to Thanksgiving.  JS  CH  L  A  F  LY   12:50, 20 November 2007 (EST)

Christmas Card
Who's writing it this year? I've got lots of juicy details from the previous year that I have just got to let out.  JS  CH  L  A  F  LY   12:52, 20 November 2007 (EST)