Conservapedia talk:Hilarious grammatical errors and misspellings by Jinxmchue

Is this really necessary? Jinx is a dick and he made an idiot of himself on Schlafly's user page, but still I feel like we are taking this too far. Aren't we better than this?--Damo2353 05:30, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Ponder ponder. I'd normally agree that this is going too far, but the guy reverted someone's spelling correction and then resorted to public taunts about these (instantly corrected) mistakes both on RW and CP. I think he is holding people to such a high standard that a brief review of his own work isn't entirely inappropriate. --Sid 05:41, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Well yes and I certainly agree that Jinx's actions were beyond the pale but this is too much like feeding the troll for me. He is deliberately trying to provoke a reaction from us and we are responding.  Don't get me wrong, Jinx is the lowest form of wanker, but I feel we're playing into his hands here.--Damo2353 05:47, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, it is petty. However, like a lot of our mocking of CP it's not the actual mistakes that are the issue, it's to highlight their hypocrisy for their self-righteous criticsm of others. It is Jinxmchue who has made this an issue. If he recants his critcisms then we can applaud his honesty and remove the page. [[Image:jollyfish.gif|25px]]Genghis   05:48, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes Jinx! You MUST apologise you horrible cunt! Ace McWickedInteresting 05:58, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
 * I don't care how petty it is. On a site full of the self righteous Jinxy stands out as one of the biggest pricks there. He gleefully jumped on a minor typo to support his prejudices. The CPers are fond of biblical references - Mathew 7:1-5 springs to mind. Silver Sloth 08:58, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

You fools (Quick! Cite the biblical reference for that!) still don't get it, do you? No, of course you don't. You'll never get it. I never claimed the high ground. I know I'm not perfect and I do not criticize other people's spelling and use it to judge their intelligence. Unless, of course, they open themselves up by criticizing other people's intelligence while making extremely elementary spelling errors. See, the issue isn't, "I, Jinx, am a better at spelling/grammar than you." It's, "You judged someone else's lack of intelligence while making stupid spelling errors of your own." It's sad that you will never understand the difference. 67.135.49.198 18:19, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Ahhh, but you're the one who doesn't understand. You see, you're the one who judges others' intelligence with their spelling as the basis while at the same time you make the same mistakes, therefore a) you are wrong in that misspellings and such can be used to measure other's intelligence b) you are stupid by your own standards or c) you aren't judging yourself by the same standards you judge others, therefore you're being hypocritical. Choose wisely. NightFlareThis is a talk page. 18:28, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Night, you forgot: d)You're a fascist ratbag who's found that the whole world's against him (except the equally fascist ratbag site that is Conservapædia) and fights like a cornered rat. 18:35, 6 August 2008 (EDT) (and Biblical references are generally a load of crap)
 * NF you pretty much took the words right out of my keyboard. And Jinxy still hasn't corrected his blog - of course spelling errors pointed out by RationalWiki are not really spelling errors are they? BTW have you heard from William123 yet Jinx? [[Image:jollyfish.gif|25px]]Genghis   18:40, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
 * Genghis: your edit comment on its own is the most accurate and concise summary of this conversation ^_^
 * Jinx: your special move ("Invent pointless distinction, claim victory") is rapidly losing power. 18:44, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

Jinx, my love, if we are mouth-breaters does that make you a hideous whistley-nose breather? Or does it just make you a prick? Hmmmm. Ace McWickedIn medias res 18:43, 6 August 2008 (EDT)


 * Number one, I think if you guys are going to pick on Jinx's spelling and grammar mistakes, you should at least get your own spelling and grammar right, and not jump on "mistakes" that aren't actually wrong. None of this "He started it, so its cool if we mess up alittle bit where crtizing him" crap. And no, using "you gotta" in a talk page doesn't count as "poor vocabulary". Number two, Ace, now I really want to see some references on CP to "the liberal mousebeaters over at RationalWiki". Can someone get on that &mdash; as soon as the boycott is over, I mean? --Marty 04:40, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
 * (Here I am responding to old comments for the sake of procrastination) It is simply a matter of standards and measurements; If Jinx considers grammar or spelling as something you can determine a person's intelligence with, then it follows that Jinx must not consider himself intelligent just like he did to that other guy on that talk page that one time. This holds true independently of whether it's true that you can measure intelligence that way, and doesn't (at least in isolation) say anything about our honesty in such judgements as we don't have to hold such views to judge. NightFlare   02:00, 28 October 2008 (EDT)