User talk:Koidevelopment/Archive1

Welcome
Bongolian (talk) 18:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Bill Lumbergh here...
Reverend Black Percy (talk) 12:46, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


 * happiness Inyë (Carfa) 12:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Welcoming users
We only ever welcome users after they've made a couple of edits. Otherwise we don't know if they're a vandal/troll. Just to let you know. (I'm talking about this for anyone who didn't know). Christopher (talk) 15:51, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


 * My apologies. I'll remember in the future. Anim (Carfa) 15:51, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

In case you missed it
Here's a thing. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 13:16, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * One last thing. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 13:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Mop
Christopher (talk) 18:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Huh
My version seemed to work just fine on my end (though I could be mistaken). You have to press the purge button a lot of times before it actually "rolls" a new text strip... Reverend Black Percy (talk) 00:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Aight. I'll roll it back to the last version then Hegel1.jpg Irresistible, aren't I? 00:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh my God, have you added that picture of Hegel to your signature? You know his woo-laden features are like kryptonite to me, right?! I exhale sharply through the nose every time I see his mug, though. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 01:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hehehehehehehe I'll change it back <3 Anim; Carfa 01:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Whenever you want to make me go like this, you know which card to play. Seriously, ask Ikanreed if Percy plans to see Hegel in hell or not. *shudder* In fact, if you ever wish to strike me down with all your hate, just post a 10,000px portrait of Hegel to my talkpage (or somewhere I'd see it). And book me a closed casket funeral, while you're at it. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 01:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

MFW I'm made to lock eyes with Hegel
Reverend Black Percy (talk) 01:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Changing your name.
You could ask to be renamed to Randír and have your old user and user talk pages redirect to your new ones. I also redemoted you. Christopher (talk) 19:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Even if you stick with your new name, you should probably put a note at the top of your user and talk page saying what happened. Christopher (talk) 16:28, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeahhh I'll stick one there right now Edhelrimdil (talk) 16:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Stay a while and listen
When I was new around these parts, back in 2015, I also liked to use italics for quotes. But turns out, doing so was a bad idea. So I quit using italics for quotes, and even pledged to remove italics from quotes where I found them — and you should too, partner! All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. I'll stay away from them then (RIP italics they died too young) Anim (Carfa) 12:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * When it's time to finally break free from italic quotes. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 12:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Bottled LIES!! WAKE UP!!
Ok, parody headline aside... Here's some vital reading, since you care about the topic (bottled water). All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 12:42, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Sexual assault allegation
I don't really think there's a need to make a page for it, it's in the edit history if it can be adequately sourced (it won't be though, it was just a way to link to his blog). For allegations such as this we'd need very good sources because we might get sued if it isn't true, we're accusing someone of sexual assault. Christopher (talk) 18:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I was keeping it for reference only. I agree with you completely. Anim (Carfa) 18:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If anyone needs it for reference they've got the history. It isn't true, just blatant self promotion. I think it should possibly be deleted. Christopher (talk) 18:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I've already taken care of it. Anim (Carfa) 18:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I mean deleted as in the individual diff, I'll do it in a second and you'll see what I mean. &mdash; Unsigned, by: Christopher / talk / contribs

Wow! Great moves, Edhelrimdil!
You're doing more than an OK job at being a sysop Keep it up, proud of ya! All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Re: having friends of different opinions
Allow me to quote philosopher Peter Boghossian: Perhaps the worst social toxin of our age is the belief that you should only form friendships with those who have similar political beliefs. Would it be right of them to disown you for not being Alt-right? Of course not.

So, assuming they are in fact your friends (i.e. people who care about you, who you care about in return, who are friendly), you may wish to think twice before asking yourself if they're still your friends.

People don't have rational reasons for their political positions. That's now how human beings work. People's political outlook is just as much a reflection of their current emotional needs, and they didn't chose those — nor are their emotions "wrong".

The best way to NOT help drive your friends deeper into the Alt-right is by staying friends with them. That will prevent them from insulating themselves into an Alt-right echo chamber of us-and-them.

If they push you away, fine — then it's of their doing. But let no one say that you were as intolerant as they are.

And if they don't feel the need to push you away just yet, it's because they're not "radicalized" enough to do so. Let's hope that day never comes, and don't help bringing it about yourself!

I've been secretly devastated from hearing how certain friends drifted closer to the Alt-right... But when they've brought up their new-found convictions, I've always focused on our common ground. In the long run, doing so actually helped defuse their interest in these movements.

And that's no surprise, because they were told that they could be edgy if they were Alt-right. People would gasp when they walked by, like they were badass Sith Lords.

And the only reason they pasted their links and rehashed their propaganda to me, was to test the waters for sweet blowback. They wanted to see my reaction.

But no blowback came. So they grew bored with it all. They were told there would be delicious pushback! Instead, there was nuance and calm. Turn out, Trump was only fun to defend when the election hype was at full blast 24/7.

It's been proven that other people's behavior changes when you change your own first. As such, I made sure to nip the situation in the bud.

I wanted them to be calm, so I showed that I was calm first. I wanted them to have nuance, so I showed I had nuance first. I wanted them to be disarmed, so I showed I was disarmed first.

I like to think that it helped quite a bit. If you want them to move closer to your views, be accepting. It's how biker gangs, cults and religions convert people. By making them feel accepted.

You shouldn't accept their viewpoints. You should show that you accept them as individuals, and you'll make their own political viewpoints less vital to them — they think they need them for emotional reasons.

After all, half the appeal of the Alt-right is really cathartic; that they let people be angry (to the point of trying to stoke anger).

Just show you'll let them be angry just as well, but without all the ideology.

Because anger exinguishes when it's not kept alive by pushback, show that you can handle their emotions, if you can. Because it's really our emotions that matter to us in the end, not specifics of politics.

Consider this.

All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * No no no no I'm not going to disown them away. That's not what I'm saying. It's just.. It's kinda hard. Really hard. That one of my friends in particular (two days ago) called some African-Americans down the street the N word under his breath is so offensive. And it's worse because we're still friends and still friendly with each other but essentially mutually opposed. I guess the world still has a ways to go for equality. Anim (Carfa) 15:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Don't see it terms of equality. See it in terms of emotion. People will feel angry, sometimes for the simple reason that they're not allowed to feel angry.


 * The question is, do you participate in the black-and-white world the angry person sees, or do you quell his fire by being like water — present, loyal, sympathetic, and clearly expressing that you see no need or reason to participate in his hate at all.


 * Anger loves company. So be company that is not angry. And keep talking and listening. You being there actively, and not being Alt-right is an invisible antivenom to his views.


 * Human beings simply have a hard time staying mad in the presence of loyal friends who are themselves not mad. You can't just be the only mad person in the room, among friends. And without his anger, of what relevance is the Alt-right to him? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Mei?
Is this the legendary useful one who comes and goes? Mei Day (talk) 14:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Could it be? Who knows? I certainly don't, as Mei was before my time. Anyway, I'll see you around mate waves Meh (You) 15:20, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, but why edit my talk page? I'm just curious. Seems a bit random to me haha Meh (You) 15:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Talk page deletion.
So - why delete the comment on the feminism talk page. I know it was silly - but why the delete?--Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 13:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * As it came from a vandal I didn't see a reason to keep it, not to mention it was offensive and hateful. Feel free to revert it and put it back, though. #Can'tComeUpWithACleverSignature 13:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I ask because we don't usually delete talk page comments. It was silly but not "obviously vile".--Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 13:43, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I get it. I really do. But in this instance, I felt it was justified. If you think differently, then revert it and we'll go about our normal business. Also, I'm not angry, so if this sounds angry, my apologies. #Can'tComeUpWithACleverSignature 13:46, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It's cool. It's really no big deal, and I'm sure you are acting in the very best interests of the site. Cheers. :-) --Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 15:52, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Re:Revisions
Some user, self-described as a doxxer, posted a bunch of oddly specific names and locations that, to me, have no relevance but I assumed only the worst so I decided to hide the revisions. And apparently, the user got mad about it and is now probably going to attack me in the future and post some crude remarks about some person I don't know. 02:26, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Faaaantastic . Parrrley 02:33, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, c'est la vie when you're dealing with the persistent specimen of wiki wandals, especially those that promote harassment (as it appears to me). Keep on the lookout for suspicious usernames and revert away, ban, and most importantly, don't talk to these people. 02:41, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, if someone with better faith wants to edit under nonproblematic usernames like "Tom Nook", you can always tell the user to request a rename. The blocked account can be renamed to something like "Null1" to make room for the new rename. 03:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Goddamn that username was offensive. Also, I don't think I have the rights to do that, but thanks for the heads up! Parrrley 03:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, those rights are reserved for moderators I believe. It's why I carefully worded "request a rename". Anyhow, for that username, you can also request a rename as well. Renames on nauseating usernames have been done, usually to something like "RationalWiki is awesome" or "Unicorns are sweet" or "Girls are lovely people" or, if you had powers, even "I love Koidevelopment and rainbows". 03:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I missed the 'request' part. MB. Parrrley 03:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

If you're talking about who I think you are, it's the Grawp vandal. His edit to my talk page was a giveaway. Christopher (talk) 15:28, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I suspected it. 18:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Conservapedia
You've probably already raised suspicion by describing yourself as "an avid Christian", it wouldn't surprise me if one of the sysops checks every new account to see if there's one with the same name here. Christopher (talk) 13:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, probably too extra. Meh (You) 13:51, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You may survive a while. There are so few active editors on CP that there might be no-one on there to notice you, I survived until I touched one of Ken's pet articles. Christopher (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Our fabulous lord Karajou the Great found me out :> Meh (You) 16:08, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * My condolences. How'd he do it? RoninMacbeth (talk) 06:04, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * "Y-you're not an avid Christian [tsundere]; you're a liar [indignant]. and you know exactly what I'm talking about [holier-than-thou]." I added what Karajou was feeling when he wrote that statement. Meh (You) 11:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You do realize that Conservapedians, including Rob Smith, frequent this site, right, Fucking idiot. Intake Manifold (talk) 20:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Talk is cheap mate. I wasn't worried about Nobs in the slightest. However, I wasn't sure how often CP peeps come here to read content with liberal bias, so I assumed I was reasonably safe. It makes no difference to me though. #Can'tComeUpWithACleverSignature 20:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Whilst it wasn't the smartest move, there's no need to sound so angry about it. Christopher (talk) 20:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * What was your user name at CP? RoninMacbeth (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Koidevelopment, which makes it pretty obvious how they found out. Christopher (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Not one of my shining moments. Mayhaps I'll try again later. Parrrley 15:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't put it past them to ban you for having a similar IP to a blocked user, or an IP that has a similar location. Christopher (talk) 15:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I think Karajou, in one brilliant move, blocked most of Europe recently. Parrrley 15:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Europe's full of pinko commie atheist liberals anyway, so it isn't much of a loss. Maybe continental Europe but he hasn't blocked my part of the UK yet. Christopher (talk) 15:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Now that you've been unblocked by Karajou, make sure to stay away from articles related to religion and relativity (or just science in general). Those articles are never going to be accurate.

On an unrelated note, you are aren't you? Christopher (talk) 18:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yo ho! Parrrley 18:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll take that as a yes. Christopher (talk) 18:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

You'll be banned for "violating the 90/10 rule" at some point, they don't like people pointing out their bullshit even if you do keep it to the talk pages. Christopher (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Islam...
apparently links to your userpage somwhere. Looking through all of your edits to the article turns up nothing except this which you removed after changing the link to your new username. Any ideas why it's still apparently linked? Christopher (talk) 16:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Fixed it. It was a link I had forgotten to remove while editing. I think awhile back I read on the style guidelines that the use of 'I' should link back to the user who put it there, and that's probably what I was thinking of when I put it there. 16:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * In that case the link probably should be there, I thought you may have accidentally signed or something.


 * I removed the note in question as I didn't really think it added anything to the article, any reason you think it should stay? Christopher (talk) 17:02, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * No reason in particular. It was just a mention that during Ramadhan the day and night kinda flip. 17:03, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Self-Driving Car
Driving forward and killing yourself (if you're the car itself) is the most moral action. Also, I'm not sure that the car would think of its own destruction as a moral dilemma. It's probably not sentient enough to have a sense of self-preservation. RoninMacbeth (talk) 01:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Not that the car would think about self-preservation, but that it would have to decide if it should kill its passenger. Parrrley 01:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Opps. I misread that. RoninMacbeth (talk) 14:07, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * What if the car was programmed to avoid tailgating other automobiles? Surely punctuality can be sacrificed for the driver's continued existence. RoninMacbeth (talk) 14:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * That'd have to be what happens. Honestly, it wouldn't be that hard and probably already exists. Parrrley 15:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Wait, you're in a self-driving car, and you start tailgating? That's a pretty big contradiction. Self-driving cars a) have a far far faster reaction time than humans and b) can easily be programmed to know exactly how long it'll take to stop or slow down to avoid getting into an accident. That's the equivalent of saying real-time GPS navigation won't be a thing because imagine a thought experiment when the paper map you bought is old and doesn't have a key road. The thing you're arguing against renders obsolete the problem you're imposing.

Most versions of the Trolly Problem involving self-driving cars I've heard are about brake failures, not tailgating, because that's a thing that can happen to self-driving cars. Thankfully brake failure is very rare, and that's likely to decrease as self-driving cars are implemented (a self-driving car, just as it's far more aware of its surroundings than a human, is far more aware of its own internal systems), but even if it's not, and we go for a max of 5% of current accidents, then we've still cut accidents by 95%. A simple cover-all algorithm like "don't hit anything if you can avoid it; else, go straight" (which is far better than you can say about panicky human drivers, who just might veer, hit a van full of children, roll, and cause 4 cars behind them to also get in the wreck), while not perfect is far more moral than not implementing self-driving cars entirley. Onychoprion (talk) 19:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Very good point. Perhaps I did load the question by saying the car tailgates, and I hadn't thought about it all the way through. Makes me want to revise my userpage now haha. Vive Liberté! 20:49, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

As has been raised variously - what is the legal situation with someone who is a non-driver/drunk/banned from driving and self-driving cars. And what happens when there is a HAL-9000 glitch/deliberate interference/the self-driving car and the sat-nav fall out (whether or not 'a third party being the actual human and/or the computer answer-back-device is involved)? 31.51.113.42 (talk) 21:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't see any reason why someone would be banned from riding in a self driving car. Same goes for drunkenness. I'm not sure what you mean by non-driver, unless you meant someone underage. Well, I think that the car would lock out someone underage from going anywhere unless their guardian had set places the car was allowed to take them (think parental controls). Uh, pardon the question, but what is HAL-9000? I'm decently sure it's from a movie but I'm not sure which and I don't know what HAL-9000 is. Anyway, I'll treat it as if it were a malicious entity that took over the cars (since that's what you probably meant). I think the simplest solution is to prevent HAL from taking over the cars in the first place by either A) creating a near sentient AI but not a fully sentient one or B) limiting what HAL is able to access from the getgo, ensuring that he isn't even capable of hacking cars in the first place, though he's sentient. Vive Liberté! 21:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Not everybody learns to drive. And the computer from 2001 which gets itself in a programming twist. There was also Marvin the Paranoid Android from The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy. So basically 'internally generated computer issues' and 'externally generated computer issues.' Also what happens if these decide to wander across the road in a random manner or this confuses the car's sensors?
 * There are a lot of legalities and practicalities to sort out first. 31.51.113.42 (talk) 22:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * HAL developed problems over time? That's an interesting thought. Well, I think that to avoid that we can't eliminate humans entirely from the process. We'd obviously need techs in place to keep checking over code and hotfix things. As for Marvin (that poor depressed android 😭😭) again, I think techs could take care of most external problems. Unless of course there was a hack, and that'd be a serious problem. Now, the goats I think would have to depend on the car's sensors. How fast it could react to the threat of hitting a goat. And I don't see dazzle camouflage making a comeback in car colour schemes any time soon haha. Vive Liberté! 22:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If you're worried about sentient or semisentient computers driving cars, you needn't. There are a lot of places where such things might become emergent, but cars isn't one of them. Not to say 'internally generated computer issues' won't be a thing, but they absolutely won't be on the order of HAL-9000. As for externally-generated issues, all modern cars have complex computers, and a lot of them can be hacked from without. This issue will probably become more of a problem as such vehicles become more numerous, but we're quickly going in that direction with or without autonomous vehicles.


 * Wildlife crossing the road is an issue humans deal with, and autonomous vehicles have a much faster reaction time than humans, so accidents and fatalities will still decrease, even if they still occur. (Also, computers don't panic, and so when they do swerve to avoid goats, it'll do so in a rational, not emotional, manner). As for dazzle-camouflage, what's the use-case there? Some asshole pedestrian wearing that to fool car sensors? You can already do that: go walking around at night in all-black. You'll dazzle and conufuse the current car-sensors, aka human eyes. Except autonomous vehicles don't just use visual light to see, they use IR and RADAR as well, and so far as I know there aren't many materials that behave identically across all those spectrums. While dazzle-paint could work on human eyes in human vision, it doesn't do anything against RADAR. While angular shapes works against RADAR, it doesn't do anything against visible light. Onychoprion (talk) 22:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not worried about sentient computer in cars, but I had no idea what HAL was, so I assumed it was sentient. On the whole, I'm not that worried about self driving cars. I can't even think of a concern currently after you resolved my poor version of the trolley problem haha. Vive Liberté! 22:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Haha, alright! Though I was more responding to the BoN than to you. I'm thinking BoN's caught in the thought-process that assumes autos will have to be 100% always-correct and perfect and moral, rather than simply better than humans. And looking at the statistics, that's a pretty low bar. One autos have already arguably surpassed. And at least in the U.S.'s common law system, legal issues will be worked out in time, and needn't be solved straight-out before things are implemented. Onychoprion (talk) 22:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

We don't
Delete talk pages for deleted articles. Here's proof I haven't made this rule up myself. Christopher (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. My bad. It won't happen again. Vive Liberté! 14:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

You sick fuck
I can't believe you wanting to mess with Andy's homeschoolers. If you came anywhere around my kids...
 * *yawn* I'm barely 18 and wanted to argue with someone who's A) already graduated and B) older than I am. Come back with something like, clever as criticism. Vive Liberté! 19:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * And I'm supposed to believe that just because you say so? Go into local a Christian school if you want a debate, anonymous internet bastards wanting to interact with kids is creepy. 71.72.212.246 (talk) 20:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * *yaaawwnn* they're legal adults, you know. I'm still waiting for legitimate criticism. Straw mans, on the whole, make for poor arguments. Vive Liberté! 20:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Christopher (talk) 15:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * }

Feminism
How can you be a feminist?--Kingdamian1 (talk) 20:53, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I beg your pardon? 20:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Because you're not advocating for the death of all men? You're going to have to be more specific Damian. Christopher (talk) 21:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I said how can you be a feminist? You state on your page that you are a feminist!--Kingdamian1 (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I saw what you said but I don't understand the question. 21:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * How can you be a Christian? You say on your userpage you are a Christian! Christopher (talk) 21:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * How can you possibly advocate feminism. I take it you have modern feminism in mind... I don't like atheists, but do you listen to Thunderf00t videos? But then again, probably you advocate child murder "abortion" too, right?--Kingdamian1 (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * How can I advocate equal rights for women? I'm not completely sure on that one myself but I think it has something to do with wanting equality for all people.. No, I don't watch YouTube that much and haven't ever watched this 'Thunderf00t' fellow's videos. 21:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * You don't like atheists? I thought we were friends? Christopher (talk) 21:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I meant feminism in modern sense Koi... Christopher, I don't hate the players I hate the GAME!--Kingdamian1 (talk) 21:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * In the modern sense like a 'down with patriarchy' sense? I'm for that because A) I'm tired of institutions still treating women like second class citizens sometimes and B) because the standards society in general holds for women are ridiculous. The fact that we still 'slut-shame' is perfect evidence of this. Men are allowed to have promiscuous sex lives but if a woman has a sex life she's a slut? 21:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Look, some are treated bad... But abortion, AND DISRESPECT for codes that are honorable, just because someone has certain insecurities about their appearance, is unacceptable to me. I am a millenial too, but I am anti-liberalist (liberalism in modern sense of course). And a staunch Right! We need respect... I mean the millenials are by far the most stupid generation. You can divide them into 2 categories, basically, pseudo "smart" people, who have no respect for ANYONE, or the garbage you meet on the streets who are basically no better than chimpanzees, CARE ABOUT NOTHING, AND call anyone who show any interest gay! Again, I am a millenial, so there is no "get off my lawn" involved.... P.S fornication is a sin for either sex...--Kingdamian1 (talk) 21:23, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Please elaborate on 'disrespect for codes that are honourable'. I'm all for respect. Respect for all people.


 * Noooo, you can't mean that all millennials are pseudo-smart or garbage? What about me and Christopher? Q.Q I daresay we're at least somewhat smart people. Also, calling people 'garbage you meet on the streets who are basically no better than chimpanzees' is, like, one of the most vicious ad hominems to come out of your mouth. Just saying. 21:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't know about you. Christopher seems to have respect for people and try to be "smart", which is rare... I am sorry, I know the reality scares me too... But look around places, do you see educated people around??? E.g does this look normal? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaHc-aZZBo0 Kingdamian1 (talk) 21:30, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * As funny as that video was, notice at 0:51 that the dumb blonde stereotype is there and somewhere around 2:00 the people interviewed are Brits? In addition, I wouldn't in any way take this as conclusive evidence. They're asking people on the street, which means you have a concoction of biases going on there. 21:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Buddy, trust me I look around... and I don't see much intelligent people around me... that video is no where close... I live in Toronto... And at this place... people are not more different from Chimps... All that matters is playing, getting high on marijuana and "sex"... Not much different from other primates! And I LOVE CHIMPANZEES just to be clear!!!Kingdamian1 (talk) 21:40, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I see plenty of intelligence around me. I know people who'll be engineers and doctors and physicists and scientists and forensics workers for the FBI and I myself plan to major in international politics and become a diplomat. We must live in very different worlds. Also why is sex in quotation marks? XD 21:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * It is my personal belief, and also supported by scripture (which I do not think you care for much)... that human sex should be different than animals mating... --Kingdamian1 (talk) 21:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Would you stop referring to people as animals? Scripture? I don't care for it much one way or the other. Well, biologically sex is the same idea whether it's between humans or dogs or cows or dolphins or whales or whichever mammal you chose...


 * I think you most probably mean that sex should be reserved for the marriage bed and that as it is now it's 'mechanical' and 'dehumanised', and so loses the glory it's supposed to have. We see differently here too, but I agree that having sex for the sake of sex isn't that great and is far from ideal. Better to have sex with someone who matters, like your partner, over a one-night-stand imo. 22:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Again, it is your kind of view that supports the "dehumanization" of sexual intercourse... If there is no objective morality, anyone does what makes them happy... as long as there is "consent"... this is why the millenials age is highlighted with either ignorance or cynicism.  Look at baby boomers... or even Generation X.... we are by far worse... NO RESPECT For anything sacred, anything moral... YOLO (you only live once SATANIC philosophy), etc. Kingdamian1 (talk) 22:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

But don't you worry... There is a generation coming... Which will redeem us.... I have a name for them.... FUCKED generation... Pardon my french!--Kingdamian1 (talk) 22:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Now you have to prove that there can be no objective morality aside from God given command. You also used 'Pardon my French!' wrong xD 22:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not about commands... It's about a foundation for a moral principle... If people regarded adultery as founded on God's law... they would not commit it (more or less)... But now, as long as the other party does not find out... and there is "consent" between 2 primates... Anything goes... And why not? There is nothing in atheistic view that would prohibit adultery... I am 100% confident that you are against adultery... But this is not based on God's law or any objective reason... It is based on your feelings... And somebody else's feelings differ from yours... so as long as no one finds out... -YOLO and do whatever you want... there PROBABLY is "no" God... now stop "worrying" and """"""""""""enjoy""""""""""" your life- Satanic lies!Kingdamian1 (talk) 22:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

What was wrong with pardon my french?Kingdamian1 (talk) 22:22, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * "But now, as long as the other party does not find out... and there is "consent" between 2 primates... Anything goes..."
 * Thaaaaaaat's absolutely not true. Cheating is still considered pretty close to if not explicitly abuse, purely based on fully leftist materialistic/atheistic ethics. It just no longer has anything to do with being considered "stolen" or ideas about "property".KrytenKoro (talk) 23:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The problem with you using 'Pardon my French!' there was that you cursed in English. If you're going to use the idiom, curse in another language and use the idiom right haha. Also, would you get off your high horse? You're the same species as those primates you keep referring to, ergo, you're a primate also. 23:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Buddy, I am afraid you don't understand the meaning of that idiom!!! We are primates by biological classification... It is up to us, as intelligent beings, to rise above biological classification...Kingdamian1 (talk) 00:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * To (unfortunately) quote Wikipedia, '"Pardon my French" or "Excuse my French" is a common English language phrase ostensibly disguising profanity as words from the French language. The phrase is uttered in an attempt to excuse the user of profanity, swearing, or curses in the presence of those offended by it, under the pretense of the words being part of a foreign language'. It'd be like.. "You petit merde (pardon my French)!" or "Bless me, how embonpoint (excuse my French) you are!"


 * Regardless of our biological classification, you need to stop calling people animals. It's offensive. Thanks. 00:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Ok... as you wish... I wasn't trying to offend anyone!Kingdamian1 (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Are you Asian?
I'm Asian! ClickerClock (talk) 00:01, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Ahh no, I am not. 00:45, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * K ClickerClock (talk) 00:49, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Why? 00:50, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I was just curious. ClickerClock (talk) 00:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh haha 01:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Templates
Is a template? I can't seem to find it. Is it part of the MediaWiki software? Thanks. 03:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Never mind. 11:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Here
join me here http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Essay:Asking_for_it --Kingdamian1 (talk) 04:40, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your opinion
I have been doing these series... here is the latest installment  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUzounw-NQ4&feature=youtu.be   ... Could you give your opinion? --Kingdamian1 (talk) 15:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll look at it when I get a chance. 18:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * it's blocked for copyright violation. 18:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * DAMN!... Can you see other installments please... They are all short... Just follow that link and other videos with the similar title will jump up... thanks--Kingdamian1 (talk) 23:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm at work so I'll look later but yes, I'll check the other ones out. 00:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and I'll be waiting for your assessment.--Kingdamian1 (talk) 16:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Here
plz check out my last installment... and rate it. if you have youtube account subscribe... Thanks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ihj_bjT9Wco&feature=youtu.be --Kingdamian1 (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

WELL.... Kingdamian1 (talk) 20:44, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * haven't had the time to watch it yet. Sorry mate. 00:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


 * You haven't had 3 minutes for me?--Kingdamian1 (talk) 16:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Well?????Kingdamian1 (talk) 18:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * .. still haven't watched it. Frankly, I just kinda don't want to. Sorry bud. 19:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * That's quite alright!--Kingdamian1 (talk) 23:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Test
02:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Who is Intake Manifold?
-Bigljbigl (talk/stalk) 11:43, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * An old troll. His MO was harassing women, LGM, JorisEnter, and I. And sometimes Chris I think. 17:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

hi
join me here http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Essay:Dawkins_Legacy  --Kingdamian1 (talk) 17:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

PLEASE
PLEASE, tell me this is sick even BY YOUR LIBERAL STANDARDS    https://ca.style.yahoo.com/periods-not-just-women-173836331.html    --Kingdamian1 (talk) 17:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * He's transgender and menstruates. I don't really see a problem here. He was biologically female at birth so.. ? 17:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)\
 * Umm holding a sign while menstruating in public.............--Kingdamian1 (talk) 18:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * He has blood on his pants. So what? Should we make laws against public blood stains?? What about mustard or bleach stains? And besides, I doubt he actually wore this in public. It's on Instagram, which means whoever saw it was following him, which means they knew what they were signing up for. Fareeha A (talk) 20:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, leaving a message
Just to say Hi, you said to leave a message. I replied on the talk page of that article just now and then saw your comment on your user page. Sorry just got caught up with stuff and this is first time back - and that person was no longer a little bit scared about what might happen in 2039, I think realized it really was a joke so that conversation ended and I just forgot to come back to check it out here. Robertinventor (talk) 00:10, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey dude. Glad that the person isn't scared anymore. 00:53, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

HEY HEY
Join me here, pls http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Essay_talk:100_signs --Kingdamian1 (talk) 03:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Who is it
Who is it you want to be? As in, your profession?--Kingdamian1 (talk) 16:51, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The answer to that is not in the cards.. no, not for you.. Fareeha A (talk) 21:57, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * ???????--Kingdamian1 (talk) 00:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Roll 1d20 and find out. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 00:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Feminst
You've said that you are a feminist, are you female? I sincerely believe that diversity on the board would be a good thing, so I hope you accept your nomination. Plus you act relatively mature, which is also a good trait. The White Wing Dove (talk) 13:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Koi isn't male or female on this site. Full stop. IRL, sure, they have a gender, but it's irrelavant. Thanks, but Koi's ineligible. Fareeha A (talk) 04:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Feminism
Feminism is a mental disorder... Get treated https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_J0Ng5cUGg --Kingdamian1 (talk) 21:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:37, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ??? 00:38, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The straw-feminism has a problem not the rest of us. Anna Livia (talk) 22:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Coop
&mdash; Unsigned, by: HCM Time / talk / contribs
 * Archiving timestamp. Christopher (talk) 10:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)