User talk:Heyguy

Topic
Breaking protocol, look, talk turns blue. I accept all repercussions but somebody should welcome this human. Edit talk pages, ya dip Gaul Dernitt (talk) 04:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

You have no actionable suggestions
If articles here are hitpieces, then pointing out the flaws (and how to fix them) should be easy. You do not do so. Until you do so, expect to see your complaints fall on deaf ears. 05:43, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * That's been tried many times. It fell on deaf ears anyway. If you are not aware there are hit pieces on this website, or where those abuses easily occur - you would not be honest or at best, you are incompetent. Heyguy (talk) 05:56, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Sock of Rome Viharo
Heyguy is a sock of Rome Viharo. He is in email communication and collaborating with pedophile/racist Emil O. W. Kirkegaard. He has also been impersonating users on this website. 166.88.123.190 (talk) 15:00, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * You're lying. Again. You're impersonating, targeting, and harassing people on the internet, manipulating this forum along with others. I hope someone puts you in jail. Heyguy (talk) 15:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The only person harassing anyone is yourself! And how is it harassment to quote someone by their own words? "For the rest, one is left to masturbate to porn, perhaps child porn (animated or not), and regular porn. That sucks, and there is nothing to do about it. Perhaps a compromise is having sex with a sleeping child without them knowing it (so, using sleeping medicine). If they dont notice it is difficult to see how they cud be harmed, even if it is rape." - The guy Emil O. W. Kirkegaard in his own words. This is the guy you have defended on his Rationalwiki talk-page. So are you defending paedophiles now Rome? You won't get on very well in jail! They would bash people like you. 162.217.27.166 (talk) 16:00, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Impersonations? Is that not what you do? According to the Rome Viharo article you use the names Bubblefish, PillyM, WWHP, Tumbleman, 23canaries, and hoofish. You have a history of socking/impersonation. But good luck proving someone has impersonated someone on this website. You have no evidence, just your word. Wouldn't go anywhere in court! Your word is useless and you are a known liar :) 162.217.27.166 (talk) 16:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but your comment contains so much misinformation and confusion that it makes no sense. Heyguy (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Your favourite word seems to be 'misinformation' but you are misunderstanding what that words means, it is not 'misinformation' to directly quote someone. As I said - Emil says in his own words he finds it "difficult" how a sleeping child can be harmed if an adult rapes them, he also has no problem with legalizing child porn (see the comments on his article). You turned up on Emil's talk-page to defend him. So do you approve of Emil's paedophilic comments. A simple no or yes will do. I am trying to figure out what your agenda in all this is. Why are you defending a known racist/pedo? These are simple questions. Do you reply back with 'misinformation'. 166.88.123.43 (talk) 17:12, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * @Heyguy I'm not the above IPs. For all I know those are you, responding to yourself since you love the drama and have a history of impersonations, if not, I apologize to these people who are also seem to be against you, presumably fed up with your lies. Are you though denying you're a sock of Rome Viharo? This denial is pointless since you use the same phrases as him and you're socks are easily identifiable. Furthermore, only you go around the internet stalking me. I don't you on Wikipedia Review to move on in your life and stop attacking me, within a short space of time you now show up here doing this again. You apparently don't have a life. Once again you've tried to insert yourself into something that doesn't involve you, as a method to attack me. One thing you have exposed though is you're a phony anti-racist/"progressive", you now turn up here defending white nationalists, when on Reddit you claim "suppress the hell out of hate speech and white nationalism." Once again showing you're a troll who doesn't actually stand for anything: you just seem to be in the internet to harass people and will contradict yourself to do so.86.14.2.77 (talk) 16:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * 86, Has Rome now converted to white nationalism? Is that why he is now siding with a racist like Emil? I am trying to pin down what his agenda in all this is. 166.88.123.43 (talk) 17:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * gee....has he? Heyguy (talk) 18:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * He got banned for posting islamophobic comments on a forum., but that was a long while back. To be honest, I don't think he has any real politics, but is just a troll. He changes views a lot in order to attack different people.86.14.2.77 (talk) 17:27, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Show me where Viharo was banned for posting islamophobic comments. Heyguy (talk) 18:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * See specifically what was bolded by the admin that banned Viharo (you) for posting all Muslims are "irrational and erratic". The joke is you have a history of posting islamophobic statements like this that got you banned on forums, but now pose as some massive SJW on twitter against what you call "bigotry". troll personas.86.14.2.77 (talk) 18:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * yeah, way too much confusion, I'm not seeing anything in that link that means what you say it does. I don't think you have a grasp of reality and everything you post is pretty garbled. Heyguy (talk) 19:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I am beginning to see the bigger picture, Viharo has a history of online racism in the past. Emil O. W. Kirkegaard is a proven white racialist, Ben Steigmann is another racist (see below). It seems Viharo will side up with racists to attack you 86. He obviously doesn't care who he is siding with, as long as they are attacking you, he is fine with it. 23.27.244.87 (talk) 19:04, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * you're not making any sense. go away. Heyguy (talk) 19:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * "Perhaps a compromise is having sex with a sleeping child without them knowing it (so, using sleeping medicine). If they dont notice it is difficult to see how they cud be harmed, even if it is rape." - Emil O. W. Kirkegaard. You still haven't spoken out against pedophile Emil or his offensive comments heyguy. Instead you turned up on Wikipedia to defend him. Well, at least you have shown your true side! So glad I am not you. 162.217.31.222 (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Your Talkpage
My apologies about the behavior of several people on this wiki towards you. If someone says something that's pretty obvious trolling you're free to remove it, by the way. If someone says something libelous towards you, however, we will remove it. RoninMacbeth (talk) 17:00, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Keywords
From my previous encounters with Rome Viharo - he's a compulsive liar who denies his own socks. Since there is no check-user tool the best is behavioural evidence such as posting style, i.e. keywords. RV's favourite words he repeats often are "progressive" and "misinformation" and he always talks about "damage to reputations". These specific terms show up in his comments (e.g. here] and [here]). "Heyguy" is a blatantly obvious sock of RV, to those who are familiar with his posting style, and the content of his website. His obsession with saying RationalWiki spreads misinformation and is destroying people's reputations through search-engine traffic is an example of psychological projection because that is what he does to abuse Google searches. Google has de-indexed articles from his website after receiving legal requests about defamation.86.14.2.77 (talk) 17:27, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * So you confirm you are the individual Viharo refers to on his site. Apparently you have a pattern of projecting your insidious and disgusting behaviors on those you are targeting. I see you were involved with Samuel Colllingswood Smith with the Candyce Lynn Potter website, attacking many innocent people on the internet with extreme slander such as calling them pedophiles. Here you are still doing this same activity. Impersonating Ben Stiegmann, then Emil. You've been doing this for quite some time, haven't you? I'm forwarding all of this over to interested parties. I could be mistaken, but I do think what you are doing is highly criminal, so I truly hope you face a judge and will do what ever I can to help make that happen. Heyguy (talk) 17:58, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I have no beef in this fight but I see several problems with what you say. Problem 1 - Emil actually is a pedophile (he thinks if an adult rapes a sleeping child there is no harm) but you keep ignoring this. Problem 2: Who the hell is 'Ben Stiegmann' and how do you know he has been impersonated? How can you impersonate someone when many people have the same name? Problem 3: There is no checkuser tool on this website, so how would you prove in court of law x has impersonated x on this website? Impossible (btw most people use VPN's on this website like you are . Bottom line is: It seems to me 86 has voiced his opinions against online racists and paedophiles. If anything shouldn't a judge be offering him a reward. I see no crimes here. He has done well :) 196.53.59.64 (talk) 18:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

the Candice potter references proves this is a viharo sock
The comment "I see you were involved with Samuel Coll[l]ingswood Smith with the Candyce Lynn Potter website" is the same sort of nonsense Viharo posts on Reddit.

Also, I've never impersonated "Ben Stiegmann" or "Emil". You only seem to exist to spread lies about me on the internet and stalk me everywhere. I told you to stop doing this 3-4 weeks back on Wikipedia Review. You're back to harassing me yet again. Stop and find something to do with your sad life.86.14.2.77 (talk) 18:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

86, - Ben Steigmann is a known racist (comments straight from his own mouth) :


 * "It is true that, on average, as shown by J. Phillipe Rushton, in “Race, Evolution, and Behavior”, there are different maturation rates with Blacks, Whites, an Asians, different cranial capacities, different testosterone levels, different levels of aggressiveness and impulsiveness, etc"
 * "Although it is politically incorrect to say this, a far larger number of murders, robberies, etc., are committed by Blacks and Latinos than whites"
 * "Judaism is a sociopolitical mental illness that has wreaked immense havoc with Communism, Zionism, and the Rothschild banking system. You have established this quite definitively on your website, I have established this with my work, linked to above. There is no doubt, looking at the Torah, the Talmud, and the Zohar, that these things are the products of cultural diseases."

So I guess heyguy = racist as he is defending white supremacists such as Emil and now Ben. Heyguy obviously hates you because you have spoken out against white supremacy and racism. 23.27.244.145 (talk) 18:42, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Even so, the account that created Emil's article is: Ben Steigmans not Ben Steigmann (these are clearly spelt different, the latter has an additional "n" and no "s"). No one was even impersonated; Viharo is lying yet again. I don't even actually know who Ben Steigmann is, nor care. But from the above comments he sounds like a racist and anti-Semitic lunatic.86.14.2.77 (talk) 18:55, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Ben Steigmann is a friend on Viharo's Facebook account (I won't link to this, but you can easily find it). This confirms the theory that Viharo associates himself with racists. I think we should add these facts to his Rationalwiki article. 23.27.244.87 (talk) 18:59, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * yeah, again - so much confusion in your posts they really don't make any sense. bugger off. Heyguy (talk) 19:19, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't see any confusion in 23's posts. Apparently you have white supremacists added as friends on Facebook. You also showed up here to defend white nationalists, and a pedophile. You aren't politically "progressive" for sure.86.14.2.77 (talk) 19:52, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Heyguy was earlier defending Ben Steigmann a known racist and saying he was going to contact him and other third parties, now he sees all these people are racists he cries 'confusion' and pretends he doesn't know what is happening. Here is Ben Steigmann in his own words "There is no doubt, looking at the Torah, the Talmud, and the Zohar, that these things are the products of cultural diseases." So heyguy you support Ben's vile anti-Semitism? :( Rome, your hidden racist agenda is coming out. I am afraid I do not know of any racist judges, you have no leg to stand on. Looks like 86 wins. :) 136.0.231.43 (talk) 19:58, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I think the big bonus for anyone looking into your shit posts is that you're stupid enough to give anyone who reads this page a perfect example of how your twisted mind operates.Heyguy (talk) 20:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * What is the definition of a twisted mind? Is that not you? You defend a racist pedophile Emil on his talk-page and an anti-Semite Ben Steigmann who calls Judaism a "disease", you then admit you will work with these third parties and report an anti-racist (86) to a judge. But sure I am the twisted one for attacking a pedo and a racist. lol. You are the dumbest person I have encountered on this website. You must be on drugs. 162.217.31.165 (talk) 20:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * @ 162, RV will side with anyone to attack me. He's done this in the past. So the fact he shows up here to defend white nationalists in order to attack me is not unexpected.
 * @ Heyguy - Lay off the drugs. Also anyone clicking here can see you're a compulsive liar: you denied being a sock of Rome Viharo when evidence is clear you are him.86.14.2.77 (talk) 20:30, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * }

Meh
17:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)