Talk:Benefit of the doubt

Can this be gotten rid of? No offesne to the original authors, but it seems, shall we say, pointless. ThunderkatzHo! 22:57, 15 October 2007 (EDT)
 * I think we should keep it, I wouldn't want to think the worse of those who wrote it, and it may have a purpose in their view. Basically I think we shoulf give it the benefit of the doubt. Be honest now, did you think no-one would do that? Actually I think it should be moved, perhaps the conservative page, rather than losing it totally. The point is a minor one, but, IMO, one worth making.--Remarcsd 00:23, 16 October 2007 (EDT)

This article should be given the benefit of the doubt. ;) ;) ;)

82.44.143.26 (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)