Talk:Historians

Why do we have this entry, unless there is something unique about the study of history, that makes doing it in plural, significant from doing it in singluar. shouldn't it just be a redirect?
 * It's also dubious dreck. Redirect it is.   17:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, yes. Quite right. The snottiness that was before shall be the offical snottiness and no alternative attempts at snottiness will be permitted.  Sniff sniff.  Thorvelden (talk) June 26, 2011