User talk:BlueMoon

15:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * "my favorite snark targets include George W. Bush" - oh it's so hard to let go... I remember a cartoon from the 2000 election: "I want Bush to win." "You're a republican?" "No, I'm a comedian, if he wins I get new material for my act every day." Totnesmartin 17:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, and I bet the same bunch were rooting for Palin. Still, I'd rather have a leader I like. One can always joke about loonies who aren't in power. BlueMoon 17:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm a confirmed Palin 2012er. As long as she never gets anywhere near the button, the lulz will be magnificent. Totnesmartin 18:07, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * A Palin/Cheney (or Cheney/Palin, I'm not fussy) ticket would provide plenty of campaign lulz while not providing much in the way of difficulty for Obama. BlueMoon 21:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Obvious naming problem is obvious
I regret to inform you that your account and IP are unlikely to finish the day unblocked over at the other site. 64.107.0.78 18:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, what? Are you saying my name will get me blocked on CP before my actions can? If that's the case, why did I just spend an hour rewriting their article on Black Holes? Please clarify which other site you mean if it's not CP. Agnostic Jewish Biologist 20:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Just wait and see buddy. Ace McWickedi9 21:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Satan
I reverted your edit:

"Also integral to the plot of the His Dark Materials trilogy by Phillip Pullman. Since reading those and the work of Jack Chick, when I read the word "Satan" I think "Vive la Revolution!" Because obviously the badass anti-servitude rebel angels are French."

The first sentence isn't one. Second sentence uses first person, poor writing style, zero content... third sentence, incomprehensible. In case you were curious. 03:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Looking back, I should say thanks. You're right, and I shouldn't edit late at night when I'm too tired to make sense.