Talk:Anarchopedia

By accident, I've searched for term Anarchopedia and positively surprised that RationalWiki has got an article about it. And negatively surprised that I didn't have account here... --Millosh (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

So, any help in relation to fixing articles about conspiracy theories and pseudoscience at Anarchopedia would be appreciated. Yes, there are left-wing myths, but such things are not anarchist, at least according to myself :) --Millosh (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

I am even thinking about making a bot to mirror some RatioanlWiki articles to Anarchopedia. BTW, Moon Hoax is an article written by person not known to me. I mean, it's a wiki, community is not so big and I don't think that Anarchopedia editors care too much about Apollo landing on Moon. --Millosh (talk)
 * hmm. I googled anarchopedia and Conservapedia's article on it is one page one - ahead of ours! I'm glad you came here instead of there! Totnesmartin (talk) 18:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * David Gerard promotes RationalWiki well among Wikimedians :) So, from time to time I am having fun by reading RW articles. Because of that I surprised that I didn't have account open. I was considering a couple of times to edit RW, too, but I forgot it :) --Millosh (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Although Conservapedia has small and regular article about Anarchopedia (at least, according to Google cache; their server is presently broken), I am not a moron to go there ;) When I started Anarchopedia, I hoped that it will a bit like RW. Free society requires rational thought and debunking myths. But, obviously, anarchists have some other priorities. That's not anything abnormal, those are just different priorities. --Millosh (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And for three years I was very upset with wiki trends: more and more right-wing (religious, fundamentalist, moron, etc.) wikis. So, I was very happy to see RW online. --Millosh (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * These days I am not so active in Anarchopedia community, but if you are willing to contribute there and you find some problems, let me know and I'll talk with other editors. --Millosh (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I have too many internet things going on already, and will soon have less time to do them in, but thanks anyway :) Also, of course, feel free to contribute here! Totnesmartin (talk) 19:21, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Archives?
So it seems that Anarchopedia is dead. Does anyone have any archives? Nevermind, I found some.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 05:24, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Poorly formatted
Need formatting 2604:A880:400:D0:0:0:1E7D:E001 (talk) 13:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Mixed bag
So essentially this article is saying this wiki is a mixed bag? Why is this wiki notable? I've checked several times and there have been almost zero edits every time I checked. It's a dead site. — Oxyaena Harass  04:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)