Thread:User talk:Nebuchadnezzar/Neurology: belief v knowledge/reply (3)

Yep. Another problem is the broad scope of "belief" -- you're going to have some sort of memory retrieval event, for example, when judging the statements in something like the Harris paper. So obviously, parts of the brain involved in memory will be activated. So you're bound to have at least some overlap in theory, even if it's trivial. ("Look, their visual cortex is showing activation as they read the propositions! Fascinating!")