User talk:Annanoon

Welcome
—Kazitor, pending 01:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrollbots, roll out!
17:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Sysop
made you Sysop recently, but this is the official announcement. Bongolian (talk) 20:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

grenfell fire
i seeing you are doing something with grenfell tower. you might wish to include something on katie hopkins - from accusing muslims of starting the fire, (they didnt, some even went door to door getting people out) to genreal smears on the survivors. she really is vermin. AMassiveGay (talk) 12:00, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I've only barely touched the surface of angry far-right anti-immigrant people about Grenfell, but I'll try and summon up the courage to delve deeper. --Annanoon (talk) 13:47, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Awesome Award
Thank you! Bongolian (talk) 08:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I've been very not busy at work lately. --Annanoon (talk) 14:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks
I just wanted to say thanks for expanding on stop and frisk, I know its often hard to tell if people notice your work so I thought I'd acknowledge it Vorarchivist (talk) 20:07, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It's something that's been in the news a lot over here so I'll maybe add some more in future. --Annanoon (talk) 09:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Can you contribute to the 'Traditional Korean medicine' document?
I curse and hate oriental medicine very much, but many Koreans don't seem to think TKM so badly. But I don't know much about TKM. Can you contribute if you know any information? sorry..--BluePink (talk) 08:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Genetics of Samaritans
I've added a bit about Samaritan genetics to the page. If you feel this is useful, I will attempt to make similar additions to other such pages you're working on. I find genetic studies are potentially a great way to debunk pseudo-archaeology, pseudo-history, nationalist revisionism, etc. CogitoNotStirred (via telepathy) (talk) 13:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Can you supplement the document?
Joshua Wong. This man is risking his life for the freedom of Hong Kong citizens. If you know anything, I want you to contribute! --BluePink (talk) 12:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Bongolian (talk) 02:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Roger Scruton edits
Really great added material to the Roger Scruton article. Thanks for improving the article! Shabi DOO  19:13, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Official Monster Raving Loonie Party
You removed a web-ref to the Social Democratic Party saying it was a duplicate. Duplicate of what? As far as I can tell, it was the only ref and now there are none.
 * There were 2 identical refs to, one in the middle of the sentence and one at the end. There's still the reference at the end, as well as another to a different source, but I removed the one from the middle (references should normally go at the end of a sentence anyway). Please sign comments so I know I'm talking to. --Annanoon (talk) 09:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Mod nomination
I have nominated you for moderator. Bongolian (talk) 20:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

David Starkey redirect
I'm not sure that this is an appropriate redirect to a stupid comment about riots 10 years ago. He may be "deserving" of his own article, given that he's got rather "interesting" views on things but the redirect is strange. Duncan from Teflpedia (talk) 05:24, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * A proper article would be good, but the redirect represents his general views and approach to controversial topics. It's one of many racist and imperialist things he's said - it's not like this was an isolated incident in an otherwise unblemished career. And if there's no redirect, you'll just get a search page that takes you there. --Annanoon (talk) 12:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Telegram suggestion
In your suggestion to write a Telegram article, you wrote the following: "How does it work, why is it popular with fash, is it genuinely dangerous". What do you mean with genuinely dangerous?. Rabbitseatcarrots (talk) 10:47, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure really. Is there anything about Telegram that threatens the world, or threatens users? There seems to be a certain amount of panic around Telegram, because lots of nasty people are using it. I don't *think* that's because it is very different to other rival apps (or is it?) There are some people who think all encryption is dangerous, especially if it is end-to-end and the government has not access to it. There are also claims that Telegram is not really as secure as you think which I doubt is specific to Telegram. --Annanoon (talk) 15:59, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Tireless work award
Thank you. Bongolian (talk) 19:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)