Template talk:BigTalkHead

This is an excellent idea, Frohlich. 23:28, 5 January 2009 (EST)
 * Thought so myself. (or I wouldn't have done it) Frohlich 23:36, 5 January 2009 (EST)
 * The third line contradicts the first line, though.  ħ uman  23:55, 5 January 2009 (EST)
 * It's intended to mean: "If you're bent on not using the +, then add your thing @ the bottom" I don't see a contradiction. It might be superfluous as Pi said on WIGO. Frohlich 00:03, 6 January 2009 (EST)
 * Well, as I said, it dilutes the message, which is "USE THE FUCKING + TO MAKE NEW SECTIONS!!111!!!". By the way, the "+" thing could be linked as a "click here top make a new section".  ħ uman  00:07, 6 January 2009 (EST)
 * I've vanished it. So it's academic now. Frohlich 00:10, 6 January 2009 (EST)
 * I saw that... it could have been useful with some tweaks. Sorry if I came on strong re: line 3 vs. 1... we can always resurrect it, right?  ħ uman  00:13, 6 January 2009 (EST)
 * How about something about the use of sub-sections if we topic begins to wander? - User   00:16, 6 January 2009 (EST)
 * Do what you want: I'm going to my room. Frohlich 00:17, 6 January 2009 (EST)
 * Hehe, why, is there a better computer in there?  ħ uman  00:52, 6 January 2009 (EST)
 * Rather than Pi's addition (& my amendments to it), I'd rather remove that third line altogether. If someone's in a thread they won't see it anyhow because it'll be at the top & presumably out of screen. Also it's long & makes the box too full so people won't bother with it. Out with it! say I. Frohlich 00:57, 6 January 2009 (EST)
 * That's better, Human, but I still think it's superfluous to an extent. Frohlich 01:00, 6 January 2009 (EST)