Thread:User talk:Stabby the Misanthrope/Let me try again

Removing nominations is counter to the process. If you don't like that someone has been nominated for an award, simply don't vote for it. Nominations are not de facto community condemnations/acclaims. That's what voting is for. Now, let's say there was an awards category for "most inconsiderate." You nominate Human. Nutty Roux and Ace come along and object, as they don't feel Human is inconsiderate and in fact think of him as a good friend. Do you remove the nomination? No. If Human is not considered the most inconsiderate, then he will not be voted most inconsiderate. That's how it works. This is why I protested the removing of nominations. However, there is an exception to the (implied) nomination removal rule. If someone is nominated for an award that unquestionably doesn't apply to them (like, nominating me for best moderator), then that nomination ought to be removed. Also, you stated that a person cannot be nominated for a category if he's won in that category before. That would be another exception. Finally, you can't just remove nominations just because you don't like them. I mean, that seems evident. What's the point of voting for these awards if you have final control of the list of nominees? The results would effectively be decided by you. I get that you like Godot. According to your award description, though, she qualifies for it. She butts into every. single. discussion. And don't mention anything about French or France, because she's the self-appointed expert on the subject and her American ass no qualms against talking down to native speakers. You might not mind that, or even like it, but that's no reason not to remove her nomination, since you don't have to vote for her. So please, replace the nominations you took out, and unblock me. I feel I have given a reasoned explanation of my position, and that the least you can do is hear me out. Then, if you disagree, I would be pleased if you told me why. Thank you.