Essay talk:Speculation about the evolution of australopithicines

I hope I can get a peer review for this essay, I also hope others can make useful contributions. Proxima Centauri (talk) 05:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * First, Australopithecus => australopithecine.
 * Second, I suggest submitting it to talk.origins or some other forum/newsgroup specializing in paleontology. The feedback would be... invaluable.--ZooGuard (talk) 08:38, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't reckon this should be in mainspace categories or linked from mainspace. 19:13, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Well of course not, since it is so badly written on so many levels. But it can surely exist as a poor essay, right?  ħ uman [[Image:human sig talk.gif|link=User talk:Human|User talk:Human]] 04:20, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

"Perhaps Australopithecus sediba" is smarter than you, PC. You can't even write a species name coherently. Nice try, though. As usual, fried through the pancakes and burnt sausage.  ħ uman  04:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)