Talk:Aristophanes

I think there needs to be a template. --Idiot numbre 188 (talk) 19:47, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete

 * Do we do literary criticism? No we don't. Let us delete this. Real first name and last initial (talk) 11:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I would be interested in seeing this expanded just to see where the author was going with this. -  π    12:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nowhere, I guess. It has started as a red link in Fun:Andicles Rex.--ZooGuard (talk) 12:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The RW article based on this - 'ways of annoying promoters of woo'/'promoters of pretentious literary criticism' (by subverting their texts)- would also reference the Invisible Pink Unicorn, Last Thursdayism and suchlike. Any ideas for what the page should be? (Playing 'spot the particular example')82.44.143.26 (talk) 17:41, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I am interested in seeing where this article was headed as well. However, as it stands now, it's an easy delete. 05:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Would 'the game' fit under 'literary criticism' or similar? Or wherever 'If the reverse of a statement is nonsense, you are being insulted' (nobody advertises stale fruit, old-fashioned clothes etc) goes. 212.85.6.26 (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC)