Talk:War on Drugs/Archive1

Law template
Maybe we ought to just get rid of the Law template on this article...  ħ uman  00:08, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
 * I do agree that there's one navigation template too many. However, I find the law template to still be relevant.  A possible alternative would be to create an horizontal variation of one of the templates, which should look more aesthetically pleasing.   00:28, 11 March 2009 (EDT)

btw source #21 comes from a website that advertises the sandy hook false flag theory as being 'irrefutable' someone may want to get rid of that source or something 99.71.136.103 (talk) 03:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Behold! It's... it's at attempt, at least. 00:40, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Naw, that's ugly. Look, the Law template and the War template only conflict/coincide on this one article.  Let's fix the article, not the templates.  ħ uman  01:05, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
 * Yah, I think it's ugly, too. I know it's just this one article — I was just inspired to see if I could flip a vertical navigation box horizontal.   01:10, 11 March 2009 (EDT)
 * I lean towards dropping the "Law" template—the article doesn't say too much about the legal aspects of the issue anyways.  01:10, 11 March 2009 (EDT)

the section edit links/buttons look screwed.
Anyone want to try fixing it? Thieh 23:15, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It's because of the two templates floating to the right. It's a MW bug and I don't know why they haven't fixed it - a series of images on the right does the same thing, I see it on WP all the time.  Just hover over them to see which section # they are to figure out which one to use if you run into it again.  23:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)