| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Difference between revisions of "RationalWiki:Chicken coop"
(→31.4 yr ban w/ IP ban) |
David Gerard (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
===My goat has something to say=== | ===My goat has something to say=== | ||
# | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Block Japanese pedophile account too=== | ||
| + | # I mean really - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 19:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:20, 18 January 2016
The chicken coop is for the avoidance, containment and resolution of cases of Headless Chicken Mode (HCM). Despite the name, this tends to be serious business.
This page can be used for reporting cases of administrative abuse (abuse of sysop or moderator abilities such as blocking, page deletion, or user rights management), general abuse (such as trolling, wandalism, and personal attacks), and conflicts which cannot be solved through normal talk page discussion (such as long-standing edit wars or article content disputes). Please be specific and include links to any relevant discussions, page edits or logs.
All editors are welcome to comment on the cases raised here, and to try to reach a consensus on any action to be taken. If no consensus can be reached, and the HCM seems to be escalating, moderators are expected to take some action. However, any serious or permanent solution, such as removal of rights or lengthy ban, requires a community vote here according to the guidelines laid out in our Community Standards.
Please try to resolve conflicts directly through discussion on other editor's talk pages before reporting them. It's better to just talk to someone rather than try to drag their name through the mud.
If the issue is not conflict resolution, but concerns RationalWiki policies, suggested changes to how things work around here, or similar matters of principle, please post on the Community Standards talk page instead.
Use {{CoopNotice}} to inform the user in question, so that they have a chance to discuss their actions here.
As a final note, if you think this page is a good tactic to apply in gaming the mob into doing your bidding, you may be shocked to see your post archived quite swiftly.
Contents
Michaeldsuarez (JuniusThaddeus)
I'm hereby bringing to the community's attention User:Michaeldsuarez, alias JuniusThaddeus (the name he uses on Encyclopedia Dramatica), and his pattern of concern troll shit-stirring & sealioning on RW while gleefully endorsing attacks on the site & its editors elsewhere.
- 11 December: Michaeldsuarez reveals he is in correspondence with Vordrak, who has asked for personal info on RW editors.
- But he still thinks Vordrak shouldn't have been banned from RW. And he confirms that he is indeed researching Gooniepunk's IRL identity.
- 29 December: Michaeldsuarez posts at the Chicken Coop that "It has come to my attention that an user is using Shouniaisha as their username" etc. etc. (this after several threads on the subject at Gamergate subreddits) and JAQs suspiciously about whether RW has any policy against this.
- Sure enough, he then edits ED's page about RW encouraging readers to troll RW with pedophile-related usernames (NSFW! expect porn pop-ups if you click on anything there).
- 3 January: he's back on RW trying to stir up anger over something that was already resolved (the SecretAgentoftheMods account).
- Over the next few days he then adds a detailed account of these & other recent events (Kiwi Farms, Vordrak's blog posts, etc.) to ED's page on RW, painting himself, Vordrak & Arisboch as heroes/victims and linking to personal info about at least two RW editors.
- Now he is trying to add a similar account (albeit without the doxxing) to our own Timeline of Gamergate article.
If this isn't concern troll behaviour, I don't know what is. I have removed Michaeldsuarez's sysop status (and here he is once again playing the innocent, feigning bewilderment as to why he isn't trusted). But really I don't feel he should be welcome here at all. As doxxing is involved, I don't think a lengthy/indefinite block would be inappropriate as with Arisboch & Vordrak. Щєазєюіδ
Methinks it is a Weasel 08:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- I refuse to click ED links as they do not let you view anything with an Ad-blocker enabled. I can only imagine what level of shite appears if the ad-blocker is disabled. So I will just take your word for the offsite stuff Weaseloid. Yes burn him and burn him long. Concern trolling of the most disruptive nature.--TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 08:36, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed. There's only one way to handle someone like this. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 08:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Ha. Their ED edits don't even meet ED's standards. (no 'do you believe that' after 'legit complaints', repeatedly and awkwardly inserting themself into the article, etc.) Narky Sawtooth
(Nyar~) 08:59, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- ED has standards? - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 09:13, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- The on-RW nuisance would seem to merit sysoprevoke and a ban. If there's off-site shit-stirring, well, whatever. If there's off-site doxxing activity, permaban and salt the earth. I don't think anyone has been buying Michaeldsuarez's concern trolling act for some time now. Queexchthonic murmurings 11:16, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hm, I was figuring Shouniaisha was Vordrak-related, but a Michaeldsuarez sock sounds far more plausible (one thing Vordrak doesn't have is even an ED level of humour). The account was really obviously set up for this sort of concern trolling and to manufacture a claim against RW - David Gerard (talk) 12:07, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, I wish that I were that clever, but no, I'm not responsible for creating the "Shouniaisha" account. I've alerted Shouniaisha (now "Ukuphendukela") to your paranoid accusation. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Kill him with fire, then. --Castaigne2 (talk) 15:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
31.4 yr ban w/ IP ban
- Doxxes users offsite, intentionally and with malice. This, alone, is sufficient for a ban. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 15:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- David Gerard (talk) 16:35, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- --Castaigne2 (talk) 16:38, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- together with torture, very painful torture.--TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 16:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Is a perfect cinnamon roll and personifies wounded innocence
My goat has something to say
Block Japanese pedophile account too
- I mean really - David Gerard (talk) 19:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)