RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2900Goal: $6000

Thread history

From User talk:Miekal/LQT
Viewing a history listing
Jump to: navigation, search
Time User Activity Comment
05:43, 14 May 2012 PeterL (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (Undo revision 1023808 by ISwagHard (talk) Don't edit comments - try the 'reply' button)
05:32, 14 May 2012 ISwagHard (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
05:30, 14 May 2012 ISwagHard (talk | contribs) Summary changed  
23:18, 9 May 2012 Ace McWicked (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
23:16, 9 May 2012 Tielec01 (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
23:04, 9 May 2012 AD (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
22:43, 9 May 2012 Miekal (talk | contribs) Deleted (get the fuck off my talk page with trolling rob, not in the mood)
22:41, 9 May 2012 RobSmith (talk | contribs) New reply created (since deleted) (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
22:23, 9 May 2012 WaitingforGodot (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
22:12, 9 May 2012 Revolverman (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
22:11, 9 May 2012 CowHammer (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
22:09, 9 May 2012 Ace McWicked (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
22:07, 9 May 2012 WaitingforGodot (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
22:04, 9 May 2012 Ace McWicked (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
22:03, 9 May 2012 WaitingforGodot (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
22:02, 9 May 2012 Ace McWicked (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
22:01, 9 May 2012 WaitingforGodot (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
21:59, 9 May 2012 Miekal (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
21:56, 9 May 2012 Ace McWicked (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
21:54, 9 May 2012 Miekal (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to telling us off for wanting two unequal status's to be equal)
21:52, 9 May 2012 Ace McWicked (talk | contribs) New thread created  

So basically you're saying "stop having an opinion that isn't ours".

AceModerator21:52, 9 May 2012
Edited by 2 users.
Last edit: 05:43, 14 May 2012

did i say that? no. But your acting like there isnt a problem when there is; american civil unions are not viewed as equal to marriages; and they aren't. you telling us "why are you complaining" just makes you look like an ass

il'Dictator Mikal21:54, 9 May 2012

Yeah, except that I conceded quite early on that the US is different and I was talking from a NZ POV, and then asked if you'd make the same argument if you lived in NZ where civil unions are the same as marriage.

AceModerator21:56, 9 May 2012

I think the heat of the arguement was getting to me then :/ sorry , personally i'd only take issue if marriage was still seen as better.

il'Dictator Mikal21:59, 9 May 2012

But here's the thing. is the NZ thing REALLY equal? Can gays marry? That's all I want to know. or are they too different to be allowed to marry?

Green mowse.pngGodot22:01, 9 May 2012

Answered in the saloon bar.

AceModerator22:02, 9 May 2012
 

so I googled. NZ does NOT allow gay marriage. "marriage" is "special" for straights only. how can you not see that this makes gays less, Ace? they dont' get to play with your toys. they are not good enough. why? ONE REASON ONLY.

They are gay. (black, muslim, women, etc.) it's bigotry.

Green mowse.pngGodot22:03, 9 May 2012
 
 
 

I can barely believe it - Mikalos disagreeing with Ace. Not only that but you're on the right side of the argument too. It's like watching a butterfly emerge from a cocoon - a sycophantic cocoon. Well done mate; incidentally I want blacks to have all the advantages of marriage, but they really can't use our word can they? When was the last time you saw a bride walk down the aisle in a black dress? QED.

Tielec01 (talk)23:16, 9 May 2012

"the right side of the argument too" Debatable.

AceModerator23:18, 9 May 2012