| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Thread history
Viewing a history listing
| Time | User | Activity | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14:47, 6 February 2014 | Nebuchadnezzar (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to If you are in the mood for arguing in blog comments...) |
| 10:03, 6 February 2014 | ZooGuard (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to If you are in the mood for arguing in blog comments...) |
| 18:49, 5 February 2014 | Nebuchadnezzar (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to If you are in the mood for arguing in blog comments...) |
| 18:06, 5 February 2014 | ZooGuard (talk | contribs) | New thread created |
look at the last few posts on Ophelia Benson's blog at Freethought Blogs - the recent re-ignition of controversy around Woody Allen has sparked the expected re-hash of arguments about confabulation.
Maybe I'm missing something here but I don't see anything particularly objectionable in the posts.
That's why I wrote "blog comments" in the thread title - E.Loftus and her involvement in the FMSF got mentioned in at least one of the comment threads.
I've always had some trepidation about the way FMSF has used the term "syndrome." That said, recovered memory proponents repeatedly make the mistake that research on false memory and confabulation precludes the possibility of "recovered" memories. (By recovered, I mean late recall, not the use of quack therapies intended to draw out "repressed" memories.) It is a straw man -- both the literature and the APA only repudiate the notions that a, recovered memory of trauma and sexual abuse is commonplace and b, that it can be done through recovered memory "therapy."