RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2900Goal: $6000

Thread history

From User talk:Nx
Viewing a history listing
Jump to: navigation, search
Time User Activity Comment
04:23, 14 June 2012 Blue (talk | contribs) New thread created  
07:12, 14 June 2012 Nx (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)
07:17, 14 June 2012 ListenerX (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)
07:23, 14 June 2012 ListenerX (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (Redundant.)
07:25, 14 June 2012 Brxbrx (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)
07:30, 14 June 2012 AD (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)
07:32, 14 June 2012 ListenerX (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)
07:37, 14 June 2012 Brxbrx (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)
07:51, 14 June 2012 ListenerX (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)
08:07, 14 June 2012 Nx (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)
08:38, 14 June 2012 Brxbrx (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)
23:17, 16 June 2012 Blue (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)
05:51, 20 June 2012 Sterile (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)
06:04, 20 June 2012 Blue (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)
14:16, 20 June 2012 Sterile (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Mod nom)

I've nominated you for moderator; please go here to accept or decline.

Seme Blue04:23, 14 June 2012

Why? Frankly, I don't understand why you still bother with this shithole. Let the drunken potheads have their fun, there are more worthwhile things to do.

-- Nx / talk07:12, 14 June 2012

For someone who has ceased to bother with the s***hole, you certainly make a lot of anonymous posts on the s***hole's talk-pages.

Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX07:17, 14 June 2012

ListenerX, you don't like cursing? Is that an asatru thing or a personal preference?


Or... Are you being IRONIC? Like a hipster?

"Shut up, Brx."07:25, 14 June 2012

In my religion, a curse is what you put on someone when you want them to die. Scatological swear words are a different animal entirely: they just have to be used less than three times in each sentence, as is the fashion these days, if you want them to retain any of their shock value.

Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX07:32, 14 June 2012

So you find cussing distasteful, or do you find it blasphemous? Is this less than three times thing a tenet of your religion or a truism of yours?

"Shut up, Brx."07:37, 14 June 2012
 
 
 

I hope you change your mind and come back, Nx.

ADtalkModerator07:30, 14 June 2012
 

Nx if you don't accept the nomination I'll do it for you. Illegitimi non carborundum, man!

Seme Blue23:17, 16 June 2012

Is that like making someone a 'crat when it's "against the rules"?

sterileGoatsforSterile.svgno new information05:51, 20 June 2012

What's a crat? What's the rules?

Seme Blue06:04, 20 June 2012