RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2900Goal: $6000

The Elliott Argument

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 11 October 2012 at 14:28.
The highlighted comment was created in this revision.

Can you please delete that essay sir? It doesn't belong on Wikipedia and it doesn't belong anywhere. If we let him be by himself, eventually he'll go away and the world will be a better place.

    76.73.41.174 (talk)18:39, 10 October 2012

    Unilaterally deleting the essay would just add more drama. Ignore it and it'll die.

      -- Nx / talk18:50, 10 October 2012

      You've been "owned" mate, apparently.

      https://www.facebook.com/THEATHEISTKILLA || https://www.facebook.com/THEATHEISTKILLA

        Mongoletsi (talk)23:33, 10 October 2012

        Oh well.

          -- Nx / talk23:41, 10 October 2012

          Don't you feel just totally humiliated and owned like a chump, Nx? You sound pretty blasé about the whole thing. lol.

          Next time, let me handle him. My life hasn't had enough fear stabbed into it by the unstoppable Creationist cannons of the mighty Elliot Argument as it crushes atheists under its holy treads! Olé olé olé!

            Ochotonaprincepsnot a pokémon23:48, 10 October 2012
             

            Falldownlaugh.gif

              Scarlet A.pngpatheticModerator09:11, 11 October 2012

              I swear, this is by far the most pathetic attempt at trolling I've ever seen.

                Reckless Noise Symphony (talk)12:52, 11 October 2012

                If it were remotely possible that Ken bred, I'd say this would be Ken Jr. Fortunately, my brain won't let me accept that such a reality would be possible. If he shows up again and immediately goes back to old tricks, I'm thinking I'll just block him for a week or so without further warning and just revert his edits.

                  Ochotonaprincepsnot a pokémon12:56, 11 October 2012

                  With you on that, Ocho. Same goes for all the mini internet warriors wanting to argue with him.

                    SophieWilder13:49, 11 October 2012
                     

                    Nah, I reckon he reproduces by mitosis. If there was breeding, there'd be descent with modification.

                      Scarlet A.pngpostateModerator14:28, 11 October 2012