RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2900Goal: $6000

Thread history

From User talk:Reckless Noise Symphony/LQT archive
Viewing a history listing
Jump to: navigation, search
Time User Activity Comment
09:39, 1 January 2013 Reckless Noise Symphony (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Why revert this?)
04:21, 1 January 2013 Cracker (talk | contribs) New thread created  

Hey yo, just wondering why you reverted this edit. Since the content in that section only responds to the question posited in the section header by saying "No, because the Supreme Court established this and that" and says nothing in reaction to the ID idiocy in the section to the left, I thought I'd add something that more directly addressed the text in that section. 84.198.53.190 (talk

84.198.53.190 (talk04:21, 1 January 2013

I had no problem with the content of the edit itself, it just seemed a bit too ad hominem for one of our top-rated articles for my liking, which is why I reverted it. However, I am willing to re-consider.

Reckless Noise Symphony (talk)09:39, 1 January 2013