| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Thread history
Viewing a history listing
| Time | User | Activity | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17:03, 14 February 2013 | Armondikov (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Special Pleading reversion) |
| 17:17, 13 February 2013 | JoeOnSunset (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Special Pleading reversion) |
| 20:45, 12 February 2013 | Tyrannis (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Special Pleading reversion) |
| 12:45, 12 February 2013 | Armondikov (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Special Pleading reversion) |
| 02:23, 12 February 2013 | JoeOnSunset (talk | contribs) | New thread created |
Hi! You recently reverted my edit on Special Pleading. The sentence in question alternated between "s/he" and "he" referring to the same person. I changed it to "she" for the whole example, in order to fix the inconsistency and also because "s/he" is ungrammatical. But I'm new here, and "s/he" may be RationalWiki style (though I'm not sure I've seen it in other articles.) Even so, the example sentence should use the same pronoun throughout. Mind discussing on the Special pleading talk page?
Personally, I hate s/he as much as I hate Y/you and W/we notation. English does have non-gendered pronouns in the form of "they" and "their".
What ADK said.