| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Crank linguistics
Ridley is a proponent of vulgar Cornucopianism. The Cornucopian vs. Malthusian debate is really just two competing cultural narratives: The steady march of progress and free enterprise vs. the world's going to hell in an environmental handbasket.
I'm trying to imagine what the compromise between those two ideas would be, but all I can come up with is "the steady march of hell in a free enterprise handbasket."
Let me guess, "With notably rare exceptions..."?
Heh, yes. His critique of agrarian past-worship is rather good, the rest of the book was MEMES/CAPITALISM!
"With notably rare exceptions, Japanese nuclear reactors have been secure from earthquakes."
I saw that one and was wondering if it was a serious or joke point?
Frankly, it actually is a very serious point, and a valid one. Japan has the single highest concentration of earth quakes in the world in an extremely densely populated area. They have 16 nuclear power plants on the main island, and have only had one major accident since the end of US occupation.
isn't that worthy of "with one major exception", which by the way, has not yet caused any lives to be lost, though teh loss of life from the tsunami (which seems so overlooked in the 'hyped' accident) is in the 10s of thousands?
just saying.