User talk:FuzzyCatPotato
Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>
Contents
Join the coalition
A grand combination is about to take place- a grand unity between Fat Aardvark and Paravant. Fat Aardvark shall be the military strategist and Paravant shall assume his old role of dictator.
Join us.— Unsigned, by: MLC2 / talk / contribs
So I know we got off to a bad start...
Why not bury the hatchet eh? Also lets be on first name terms, nice to meet you I'm 4ardvark— Unsigned, by: FuzzyCatTomato / talk / contribs
I salute your bravery.
Vale — Unsigned, by: 139.130.16.222 / talk / contribs
On S0H
- This discussion was moved to Talk:Shoe0nHead.
r/AznIdentity
It's obvious that /r/AznIdentity is now vandalizing our edits. Is there any way to block users coming from there? Or to ban users who try and remove the entry and replace it with totally non-offensive ones? — Unsigned, by: 10101 / talk / contribs
- Strange as it is for an IP-addressed user to say, perhaps edit privileges should be limited in some way? Heaven knows /r/Aznidentity is quite the handful, and they've already demonstrated poor behaviour here.— Unsigned, by: 104.207.156.120 / talk / contribs
looking into issue
this user is requesting user FuzzyCatPotato to look into the issue of the most recent vandal-binning imposed upon this user, which this user considers to be a misplaced one. this user noticed that user FuzzyCatPotato possesses administrative powers over other administrators, thus summoning the user.this user might be on a wrong observation. — Unsigned, by: FAMAS / talk / contribs
Passive aggression
- This discussion was moved to RW:BAR.
FYI
- This discussion was moved to RW:BAR.
Plz
Don't miss.
Reverend Black Percy (talk) 00:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
When life gives you influenza
You gotta make influenzade. All the best buddy, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Friday was pizza day, the best day of the week
All the kids would line up super-early just to help me out on the article Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:10, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
User page layout
Hey, if you don't mind me asking amigo, how come the text on your user page is a long column now? Don't get me wrong friend, I don't have anything against it, just curiosity due to the fact that pereviously it was a short paragraph that was in line with other.--WMS (talk) 23:20, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- I put it into a bunch of blockquotes instead of table-formatting it. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 00:47, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Come suffer with me
Like watching Nazi paint dry.
Reverend Black Percy (talk) 03:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Hipocrite isn't interested in improving RW.
Hello,
This is in reference to Laci Green's page.
If the statements are true, they should be mentioned and said that it's true.
If the statements are false, they should be mentioned and said that it's false.
In all the cases, the sentences are to be mentioned.
If the sentences are mentioned, and it's said that they are false, and whatever reasoning Hipocrite has is written down, RW will improve both in terms of quality and quantity.
Sadly, Hipocrite is not interested in that.
As an admin, I would request you to reverse his edits, protect the page, place Hipocrite in vandal bin, remove whatever user rights he has.
Thanks. Rational1 (talk) 16:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- You don't like someone disagreeing with you so you try to censor them? I want you to stop telling lies about people on our pages. When you find a winger criticism of one of your SJW targets, instead of copypasting it on our pages without even doing the remotest due diligence, instead spend the literal minutes it takes to debunk it and do so. You realize I could have blocked you, locked the page so you couldn't edit it, and placed you in the bin at any point in our conversation, yet I did no such thing? Perhaps your intolerance of dissent is the problem here. We don't parrot every dumb thing some nobody winger (or you, in one case) thinks in order to debunk it. Our pages are curated such that they are useful. Spewing garbage all over them so that others will clean it up is not what we do here. If you want to debunk the idiot points you are placing on our pages, do so. Hipocrite (talk) 16:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- This is a crowd-sourced website. I do not need to be 100% correct and write complete sections. I can write half the section (what others have claimed about her) and leave the other half for someone up to fill up.
- What the fuck do you think will happen when people see your version of Laci Green's page? They aren't going to think that they can rely on it, they are going to think that most of the stuff isn't covered. Are they going to think that Laci Green's critics are wrong? No. They are going to think, "God knows if that criticism of her filling a DCMA claim is true of flase, may be it's true, she goofed up that one time, and may be many of the other criticism about her is also true".
- I am making false statements? I don't know the correct context of Laci's tweet? How can I? RW is the website which is supposed to give me that information, and yet, here we are....you are claiming to have access to this "great knowledge" and yet aren't sharing it here? Rational1 (talk) 16:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- If you have crazy statements that you think are bullshit and you think should be refuted, put them on the talk page and ask someone to do the work. Don't shit up our articles with anti-SJW garbage. Hipocrite (talk) 16:54, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- "I don't know the correct context of Laci's tweet? How can I?" - www.twitter.com has a pretty good search function. Or ask on the talk page. Perhaps someone feels like educating you. I don't like you, so I don't want to help you. Hipocrite (talk) 16:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- How am I, or anyone for that matter to believe that your statements of non-cooperation are not results of cognitive dissonance bias? Rational1 (talk) 17:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- I dunno, we could go to the history - you know, the last time you accused me of that but it turned out you were just engaged in quote mining? Hipocrite (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Even if you were correct on that matter, that's irrelevant here. You not being delusional about something, doesn't means that you are never delusional about anything. Even if you have a very impressive record, it doesn't eliminates the possibility of you being a sellout on the topic of Laci Green, who is knowingly removing valid criticism against her. Rational1 (talk) 17:10, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Sure, it's possible I'm a total shill for Laci Green who has been waiting in the wings for 7 years to whitewash the article about her, but it's ALSO possible that I was looking at your history of edits after you were busted quotemining shit about Sarkeesian and saw you did the same thing to another target of the "anti-SJWs" and intervened. I guess the question is which is more likely? Hipocrite (talk) 17:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Even if you were correct on that matter, that's irrelevant here. You not being delusional about something, doesn't means that you are never delusional about anything. Even if you have a very impressive record, it doesn't eliminates the possibility of you being a sellout on the topic of Laci Green, who is knowingly removing valid criticism against her. Rational1 (talk) 17:10, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- I dunno, we could go to the history - you know, the last time you accused me of that but it turned out you were just engaged in quote mining? Hipocrite (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- How am I, or anyone for that matter to believe that your statements of non-cooperation are not results of cognitive dissonance bias? Rational1 (talk) 17:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Have you marked me as "Enemy of the World"? Your statements remind me of Scientology. In Scientology, even if a friend/family member merely mentions having any thoughts in line with disagreeing with anything they are preached, you are to write up a detailed report and submit to officials. Your friend/family member will then be subjected to hours upon hours of tests. Even if you are best member RW has ever seen, and I am the worst member RW has ever seen, debunking those statements is what should be done, instead of just ignoring them. Rational1 (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)