Difference between revisions of "User talk:Skeptical"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Ad hominems: new section)
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Emil_O._W._Kirkegaard&diff=prev&oldid=1889865 It's fine to insult people, especially those who hold really stupid views, but this feels pretty pithy rather than snarky]. {{User:FuzzyCatPotato/sig|}} 02:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 
[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Emil_O._W._Kirkegaard&diff=prev&oldid=1889865 It's fine to insult people, especially those who hold really stupid views, but this feels pretty pithy rather than snarky]. {{User:FuzzyCatPotato/sig|}} 02:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 +
: I WILL PUNCH YOU IN THE FACE. half-a-pint diaper boy.[[User:Skeptical|Skeptical]] ([[User talk:Skeptical|talk]]) 04:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:06, 3 November 2017

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Skeptical!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Kazitor, pending 02:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, Autopatrolled has been added to your user rights. This lets you bypass most of the abuse filters, bypass the CAPTCHA, and edit more frequently. If you have questions, bleat ask away.

We hope you enjoy your newfound POWER — and these external tools:

  • Google Scholar Button (Chrome, Firefox) searches your highlighted text in Google Scholar. Easily check academic citations!
  • web.archive.org and archive.is can save permanent copies of webpages. Never lose a crank website or racist Tweet ever again!

Kazitor, pending 12:27, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

You've been demoted!

Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, wizard Sysop has been added to your user rights. Feel free to let your newfound POWER course through your veins. Once the high wears off, see RationalWiki:Sysop guide for more information. If you have questions, bleat ask away. —ѕυρяємє ℓєα∂єя вιgѕ σf gσαтιѕтαи (ᴡᴏʀᴅs ᴏғ ᴡɪsᴅᴏᴍ/ᴀᴄʜɪᴇᴠᴇᴍᴇɴᴛs) 00:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

An angry BoN appeared!

Troll

Hey asshole,

Just because I support a stance that those who have reached puberty are at a more mature level doesn't classify me as a pedophile, or a creep. Have you even looked at what the term pedophile even means? I am 18 myself and as a recent teenager I can speak to how miscategorized we are. While an adolescent brain is still growing, it is not a six-year-old brain by any means.

Also, attraction to some post-pubescent teens is natural, due to their mature appearance. I only justify acting on this if they are 16 or older, the common age of consent.

Just because I am arguing a particular stance does not mean you should block me. Doing so is censoring my opinion. Rational people are supposed to rely on science and logic, not whatever the fuck you're doing. (And yes, I know I called you an asshole. This was obviously in retaliation.)

Yours sincerely, 138.247.97.94 (talk) 23:08, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

You posted sexual attraction to pubescent's is natural. This is pedophilia and the only people who try to re-define pedophilia to pre-pubescents (to exclude pubescents) are pedophiles/pedophilia apologists. Also, I'm not interested in debating this with pedophiles: you're clearly a pedophile who comes here expecting to "debate" this subject. There's millions of topics to edit, and you're a creep who comes here to edit pedophilia articles. If I had it my way, this site would just block pedophiles on sight.Skeptical (talk) 15:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Ad hominems

It's fine to insult people, especially those who hold really stupid views, but this feels pretty pithy rather than snarky. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 02:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

I WILL PUNCH YOU IN THE FACE. half-a-pint diaper boy.Skeptical (talk) 04:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)