Conservapedia talk:AddisonDM

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

IMPROVE PLEASE!!!! --<choose> <option>Input The ResistorOutput</option> <option>CoyoteOver 450 pages watched NOT including talk pages</option> <option>The Trickster</option> <option>Acionyx</option> 19:08, 21 April 2009 (EDT)

Improve it yourself, you created it. User:Theemperor/Sig/Sig 19:37, 21 April 2009 (EDT)

CUR we have enough bad articles about sysops and the like, if you are going to create one could you at least have some information worth adding. - User \pi 19:43, 21 April 2009 (EDT)

Should we...[edit]

Should we really have an article on Addison? Don't you think that perhaps we should be slightly more sensitive with the kids on CP? I vote that this is deleted.--Star trooper man 05:14, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Is he one of the kids? If he is, he's very active. An active Hitler Youth is as bad as an SS member, is they not? To draw a parable, if not break Poe's Law, at least. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
I think he's about 15. I'm not sure though. On your second point, I don't entirely agree. I mean of course it's as bad an occurence. but should we judge them the same?--Star trooper man 06:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Since he is a "public editor" he's fair game at some level. The article isn't exactly what I'd call harsh or unfair or anything - it's actually fairly complimentary, isn't it? ħumanUser talk:Human 19:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
It is fairly complimentary, but that's not my qualm. I think he should be exempt from the kind of analysis we subject the likes of Ken as he's (I think) just a kid (he seems to know Bethany in person). I guess it's up to you (I'm not all that active, so I don't feel I have too much right to an opinion).--Star trooper man 21:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Have we even got anything to say about Addison? Most of these sysop articles are old dumping grounds for random crap, funny email exchange, table of their edits, Karajou's is mostly about his navel career that was on some talk page which it was decided was too good to just archive away. - π 23:12, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Not really, as far as I can see. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Well it was created by CUR which is usually a good enough reason to delete. - π 01:03, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Lolol, navel career. Sorry, carry on. Webbtje (talk) 11:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)