There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
| Fiction over fact|
|How it didn't happen|
Although his claims are less drastic than some revisionists (e.g. Immanuel Velikovsky) they are controversial and not accepted by most historians.
One problem is that he claims to have found archaeological evidence in Egypt for the story of Joseph, with a statue appearing to wear Joseph's coat of many colours. However Joseph's coat of many colours is now regarded as a mistranslation, more recent translations include a richly ornamented coat, a coat with long sleeves, or a long dress. More broadly, the Joseph story is now widely regarded as a relatively late addition, a "beautifully constructed novella" intended to provide a link between the earlier patriarchal narratives and the Exodus, among the less likely earlier biblical narratives to have a historical basis.
- How Myth Became History, Peter Martin, David Rohl official blog, April 8, 2012