Debate:I don't belive in conspiracy theories and sensible (non-religious) sciences but I would rather be completley wrong with my opinions than right... am I a crank?

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Debate.png This is a Debate page.
Feel free to add your own spin on the story. Please keep it civil!
Information icon.svg This debate was created by signed users.

{{Jack the worried crank to be?}


sorry guys I meant to say I do believe in sensible science. I recently read the page about cranks on the rational wiki page and I thought to my self that sounds like me apart from the fact I don't believe in stupid outlandish theories, could I be a crank that uses generally accepted sciences and evidence rather than pseudoscience or conspiracy theories? — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

The definition directly states a crank is someone that believes in stupid outlandish theories that have little or no grounding in reality. However, many think they do believe in real sound science which is why so few listen to anyone else. So your question is kind of hard to answer. -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 15:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)