There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Denial of Soviet occupation
| Join the party!|
|Opiates for the masses|
| Not just a river in Egypt|
|♫ We're not listening ♫|
|—Russian Federation's foreign minister Sergei Ivanov, May 7 2005, in an address to Red Army veterans|
“”It is just another inadequate action of the President. What occupation? This is absurd. [...] Communists will use all influence on the parliamentary majority to prevent opening of such museum.
|—Oleksandr Golub, of the Communist Party of Ukraine, March 2 2007, commenting on president Yushchenko's initiative on opening an occupation museum in Ukraine.[note 1]|
“”There was no occupation. There were agreements at the time with the legitimately elected authorities in the Baltic countries.
|—Kremlin's European affairs chief Sergei Yastrzhembsky|
|—Gerald Ford in a Oct 6 1976 debate with Jimmy Carter|
- However, Yuschenko's version of history wasn't unassailable either as the Ukrainian situation was a bit more complex than in the Baltic states. Ukraine had been claimed by the Soviet Union since 1917 (and had been part of the Tsars' Russian Empire since 1775) and was thus not (first) occupied by the USSR in WWII, but had been a Soviet Republic since 1919. Furthermore, Ukraine had had (at least) 3 separate governments in 1917, one of which (the Ukrainian People's Republic of Soviets) had sided with and wanted to join the Soviet Union. Essentially, Yuschenko's argument rested on the premise that the interim Ukrainian Communist government was illegitimate, though how it was more so than its competitors such as the Ukrainian State or the larger Ukrainian People's Republic is anyone's guess. Further complicating matters of occupation and sovereignty, the UPR had initially constituted itself within the framework of the 1917 Republic of Russia (i.e. after the establishment of the Kerensky-government, but before the Bolsheviks took over) and only declared independence in 1918.
- Warfare and Society in Europe: 1898 to the Present By Michael S. Neiberg; p 160
- AP European History; p. 461
- RIA Novosti: Иванов назвал "абсурдом" заявления об оккупации СССР Прибалтики То, что говорят, что СССР оккупировал прибалтийские государства — это абсурд и чушь. Нельзя оккупировать то, что тебе принадлежит.
- Communists against creation of Occupation Museum in Ukraine, March 2 2007, (archived by the Wayback Machine).
- AFP May 2005: Kremlin denies Soviet 'occupation' of Baltics
- "1976 Presidential Debates". CNN. http://www-cgi.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/debates/history/1976/. Retrieved July 7, 2015.