Draft:Debate Bro

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Information icon.svg This is a draft that anyone is free to edit as they would a mainspace page.

Do not add categories to draft pages; put them in comment tags instead.

Contributors should nominate draft articles for deletion only if they believe that the article is not applicable to RationalWiki's mission.

Articles involving living persons must conform to our guidelines on biographies of living people.

Debate Bro is a pejorative term used to describe the debate tactics, behavior, and general attitude of mostly white, cismale YouTubers and podcasters that frequently engage in one-on-one debates, or as panelists/moderators of roundtable debates. The mere act of debating is not enough to qualify as a Debate Bro, but there are a few indicators that one could use to identify a Debate Bro:

— Use of rhetorical arguments

— Agressive argumentation style

— Frequent yelling — Wild vascilation between logically sound arguments and logically unsound arguments — has a Gamer™ chair — Probably into anime (add more later)

Debate Bros are often accused of sophism and having poorly formed logical arguments, if they have any logical arguments at all. They have a natural enemy in Video Essayists, and the two species attack each other mercilessly, but not on the battlefield of ideas; these factions work out their differences fight like petty children on the only forum that truly matters: Twitter.

(article not completed)